fna diagnosis of hutchison pepper syndrome and metastatic neuroblastoma: a report of two cases
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: FNA diagnosis of Hutchison Pepper syndrome and metastatic neuroblastoma: A report of two cases](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022080306/575004381a28ab11489d8546/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
FNA Diagnosis of HutchisonPepper Syndrome andMetastatic Neuroblastoma:A Report of Two Cases
Dear Dr. Bedrossian:
Neuroblastoma is one of the most common extracranial
tumors of childhood.1 It usually occurs before 4 years of
age and affects both sexes.2 These neoplasms are known
to have origin from primordial neural crest and commonly
occur in the adrenal gland and retroperitoneal sympathetic
ganglia.3,4 The role of fine-needle aspiration cytology
(FNAC) in diagnosing neuroblastic tumors has been fairly
well document.5 The authors here take this opportunity to
report two cases of neuroblastoma diagnosed with the
help of FNAC, and further confirmed by immunostaining.
However, a differential diagnosis with other round cell
tumors has to be kept in mind.
Case 1
A 2-years-old male child presented with complaints of
increasing pallor, frontal swelling and proptosis for 3
months with cervical lymphadenopathy for the past 1
month. Computed Tomography (CT) brain showed ero-
sion of left temporal bone with a surrounding heterogene-
ously enhancing soft tissue mass (Fig. 1). On X-ray lytic
lesions were seen involving humerus, ribs and scapula.
Ultrasonography (USG) abdomen showed hepatomegaly
and mesenteric lymphadenopathy. No other abdominal
mass was visualized.
FNAC of cervical lymph nodes and liver (under USG
guidance) revealed groups of small round cells arranged
in rosettes around a fine fibrillar material (Homer Wright
rosettes) (Fig. 2). The entire lymph node on biopsy was
found to be replaced by a monotonous population of
small round cells (Fig. 3). Immunostaining for synapto-
physin was positive in these neoplastic cells as well as in
the fibrillar extracellular material (Fig. 4). Bone marrow
smears appeared hypercellular, and showed groups of
small round cells having scant ill-defined cytoplasm
and stippled chromatin (Fig. 5). Myelopoiesis and erythro-
poiesis were unremarkable. Thus, a final diagnosis of met-
astatic neuroblastoma was rendered, presenting as Hutchi-
son and Pepper syndrome.
Case 2
A 6-year-old boy presented with right sided abdominal
lump and right supraclavicular lymphadenopathy for 1
month. The abdominal lump was globular, firm and meas-
ured around 10 3 10 cm. USG abdomen showed a right
suprarenal mass invading into liver and retroperitoneum
with enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes. FNAC from ab-
dominal lump (USG guided) and right supraclavicular
lymph node showed similar morphology. The smears
were highly cellular, comprising of small round cells with
scant cytoplasm and nuclear moulding; forming rosettes
with central pink fibrillar material and stromal fragments,
suggestive of a small-round-cell tumor. Urinary catechol-
amines were raised (homovanillic acid [HVA]-431 mg/g
creatinine and vanillylmandelic acid [VMA]-397 mg/g
creatinine).
An excisional biopsy of the lymph node was per-
formed. Sections showed sheets of small round cells with
high nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio and stippled nuclear chro-
matin replacing the entire lymph node. Biopsy along with
the clinical and laboratory findings confirmed the diagno-
sis of neuroblastoma.
Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid
tumor of childhood, accounting for 8–10% of paediatric
cancer. Over 80% are detected under the age of 4 years
and the median age at diagnosis is 21 months, with no
sex predilection.2 It arises from the primordial neural
crest and therefore can be found at any site which har-
bours sympathetic neural crest.3 These are most com-
monly known to occur in the adrenal gland and retroperi-
toneal sympathetic ganglia.4 However, they also occur at
other neural crest sites like thoraco-pulmonary, mediasti-
*Correspondence to: Siddiqui, Farhan, M.D., Department of Pathol-ogy, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Ali-garh, Uttar Pradesh 202002, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Received 15 May 2008; Accepted 3 July 2008DOI 10.1002/dc.20935Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).
' 2008 WILEY-LISS, INC. Diagnostic Cytopathology, Vol 36, No 11 843
![Page 2: FNA diagnosis of Hutchison Pepper syndrome and metastatic neuroblastoma: A report of two cases](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022080306/575004381a28ab11489d8546/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
nal, cervical and pelvic regions.6 In one of our cases, the
primary was found in adrenal glands and he had raised
urinary catecholamines, while in the other 2-years-old
child, primary could not be detected and he presented with
widespread metastasis as Hutchison-Pepper syndrome.
On FNAC, smears appear to be hypercellular with pre-
dominantly individual scattered malignant cells having a
high nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio, stippled chromatin and
scant cytoplasm. Cohesive groups of these tumor cells
with prominent nuclear moulding may also be seen, as
was seen in one of our cases. The presence of Homer-
Wright rosettes is diagnostic but they may not be present
in all the cases.6 These rosettes of neuroblastoma do not
have a central lumen.2 However, the presence of neuropil
is the most helpful feature for rendering a definitive cyto-
logic diagnosis of neuroblastoma.7
These tumors are positive for neuron specific enolase
(NSE), synaptophysin, S-100 and glial fibrillary acidic
protein (GFAP).8 Ultrastructurally, these tumor cells have
dense core neurosecretory type granules and abundant
processes containing microtubules.8
The differential diagnosis of neuroblastoma includes
Wilms’ tumor, Ewing’s sarcoma, intra-abdominal desmo-
plastic small-round-cell tumor of childhood and lympho-
blastic lymphoma. Immunostaining plays a very important
role in differentiating among these tumors. Wilms’ tumor
Fig. 1. CT scan showing erosion of left temporal bone with surroundingheterogeneously enhancing soft tissue mass with intracranial extensionextraaxially.
Fig. 2. FNA smears showing small round cells with stippled chromatinand scant cytoplasm, arranged in rosettes around fine fibrillar material(arrow) (H & E 3500).
Fig. 3. Section showing effacement of lymph node architecture andreplacement by monotonous population of small round cells, with twoHomer Wright rosettes (>) (H & E 3500).
Fig. 4. Section showing positivity to synaptophysin (3500).
ALAM ET AL.
844 Diagnostic Cytopathology, Vol 36, No 11
Diagnostic Cytopathology DOI 10.1002/dc
![Page 3: FNA diagnosis of Hutchison Pepper syndrome and metastatic neuroblastoma: A report of two cases](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022080306/575004381a28ab11489d8546/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
classically shows a triphasic pattern consisting of epithe-
lial, mesenchymal and a primitive blastemal component.
Blastemal cells show positivity to vimentin, low molecu-
lar weight cytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen
(EMA). Ewing’s sarcoma-cells stain positively with
CD99. Intra-abdominal desmoplastic small-round-cell
tumor of childhood expresses both epithelial as well as
mesenchymal markers and therefore shows positivity to
cytokeratin, desmin and NSE. Lymphoblastic lymphoma
shows the presence of a large number of lymphoglandular
bodies in the background which are rarely seen in neuro-
blastoma, and are positive for leukocyte common antigen
(LCA) and terminal deoxy-nucleotidyl transferase (tdT).6
These commonly metastasize to liver (called as Pep-
per’s syndrome), skeletal system specially skull and orbit
(called as Hutchison’s syndrome), lymph nodes, ovary,
testis, paratesticular region, central nervous system and
bone.2 Most of the patients usually present in late stage9;
as was seen in our cases; one presented with Hutchison-
Pepper syndrome, while the other presented with metasta-
sis to supraclavicular lymph node. The prognosis of neu-
roblastoma depends on age, site of involvement and
stage.6
Hereby, we suggest that FNAC is a rapid, safe and
non-expensive diagnostic technique that yields sufficient
material and aids in the diagnosis of neuroblastoma.
Kiran Alam, M.D.
Farhan Siddiqui, M.D.*
Nazima Haider, M.D.
Veena Maheshwari, M.D.
Anshu Jain, M.D.
Arshad Khan, M.B.B.S.
Department of Pathology
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College
Aligarh Muslim University
Aligarh, India
References1. Shaw DG. Oncology and hematology. In: Gordon I, editor. Diag-
nostic imaging in pediatrics. London: Chapman and Hall; 1987. p112–114.
2. Rosai J. Rosai and Ackerman’s surgical pathology. 9th ed. NewDelhi: Elsevier; 2004. p 1127–1132.
3. Kushner BH, Cheung NKV. Neuroblastoma-from genetic profile toclinical challenge. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2215–2217.
4. Geisinger KR, Silverman JF, Wakely PE, Jr. Pediatric cytopathology.Chicago: American Society of Clinical Pathologists; 1994.
5. Rekhi B, Gorad BD, Kakade AC, Chinoy RF. Scope of FNAC in thediagnosis of soft tissue tumors—A study from a tertiary cancer refer-ral center in India. CytoJournal 2007;4:20.
6. Singh HK, Silverman JF. Paediatric tumours. In: Orell SR, SterettGF, Whitaker D, editors. Fine-needle aspiration cytology. 4th ed.New Delhi: Elsevier; 2005. p 447–452.
7. Layfield LJ, Liu K, Dodge RK. Logistic regression analysis of smallround-cell neoplasms: A cytologic study. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;20:271–277.
8. Silverman JF, Dabbs DJ, Ganick DH, et al. Fine-needle aspirationcytology of neuroblastoma, including peripheral neuroectodermaltumor, with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural confirmation.Acta Cytol 1988;32:367–376.
9. Triche TJ, Askin FB, Kissane JM. Neuroblastoma, Ewing’s sarcoma,and the differential diagnosis of small-, round-, blue-cell tumors. In:Finegold M, editor. Pathology of neoplasms in children and adoles-cents. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1986. p 145–195.
Fig. 5. Bone marrow smears showing small round cells with stippledchromatin and ill-defined cytoplasm (MGG 3500).
FNA DIAGNOSIS OF NEUROBLASTOMA
Diagnostic Cytopathology, Vol 36, No 11 845
Diagnostic Cytopathology DOI 10.1002/dc