foodservice operator a&u · • online quantitative study • n=500 foodservice operators...
TRANSCRIPT
Foodservice Operator A&UWith Technomic
October 2017
2MENU TRACKER | 2017
Contents • Objectives & Methodology• Summary & Implications• Topline Foodservice Market Performance• Report Deep Dive
-Sweetener Attributes & Preferences-Honey Formats-Sweetener Usage & Perceptions-Honey Usage
• Appendix
3MENU TRACKER | 2017
Objectives & Methodology
4MENU TRACKER | 2017
• Examine general attitudes, usage, preference, and barriers to using honey (relative to other key competing sweeteners).
• This will be used as a benchmark for future studies to track the change of these attitudes and usage of honey by operators over time.
Objectives
5MENU TRACKER | 2017
Methodology• Online quantitative study• N=500 foodservice operators (commercial and non-commercial)
38%
38%
9%
14%
Operation Type
LSRs
FSRs
Catering
Hotel/Lodging/Casino
55%
45%
Type of LSR
Fast food
Fast casual
53%36%
11%
Type of FSR
Casual dining establishment
Polished/upscale casual dining establishment
Fine dining establishment
6MENU TRACKER | 2017
About Technomic: • For over 50 years, Technomic has been assisting clients with interests in the global food and
beverage industries to obtain a better understanding of the marketplace and potential opportunities.
• Technomic is considered to be the leading research and consulting firm specializing in the foodservice industry
• As part of Winsight, Technomic is positioned as a leader in multiple facets of the global foodservice industry. Winsight provides customers and audiences access to the most credible source of industry market intelligence with top industry print and digital media assets, world class events, and Technomic’s channel-relevant strategic research and insights.
• Beyond Technomic, Winsight provides global reach and insights through its media (including Restaurant Business, CSP, Foodservice Director and others) and Events (including the Global Restaurant Leadership Conference, FARE, Outlook Leadership, FSTEC and others).
7MENU TRACKER | 2017
Summary
8MENU TRACKER | 2017
Sugar leads in all keys measures, including preference, usage, effectiveness and versatility. Honey is a strong second across these measures, with agave syrup coming in at a distant third. Sugar is seen as delivering best on versatility, and interestingly, the second highest attribute for sugar is wholesome and all natural.
Sugar Leads all Sweeteners
9MENU TRACKER | 2017
Honey is most attributed to being natural/unprocessed, having an appealing flavor, and being a nutritious sweetener option. In fact, honey’s all-natural attribute resonates strongest with operators as being the most relevant message about honey.
Honey Wins on All-Natural
10MENU TRACKER | 2017
Price (47%) and consumer demand (42%) are the top reasons operators avoid using honey. Although, among operators reporting increasing usage, consumer demand is the top reason for doing so. LSRs over index on reasons pertaining to lack of knowledge on how to use and source honey.
Price is the Main Barrier
11MENU TRACKER | 2017
Bulk honey usage is being driven by FSR using honey as a cooking ingredient (75%), baking ingredient (59%), sauces (47%) and dressings (45%).
Honey Usage
12MENU TRACKER | 2017
Metrics Dashboard
Key Tracking Metrics YOY
2017 2018
Honey Preference and Delivery
Average Ranking of Honey as Favorite Sweetener 2.0
Effectiveness/Preference (top 3 box: rated 7, 8, or 9) 81%
Versatility (top 3 box: rated 7, 8, or 9) 85%
Front of House Preference (Consumer Demand) 83%
Honey Usage
% Using More Honey vs. YA (Net Positive) 20%
% Anticipating Using More Honey Over Next Year (net positive) 14%
% Currently Using Honey as a Sugar Substitute 77%
Honey Barriers
Consumer Demand 42%
13MENU TRACKER | 2017
Foodservice Market Performance
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
Nominal
Fastest-growing segments
7.5%
6.5%
4.0%
3.0%
6.4%
6.7%
4.2%
3.0%
Fast casual—LSR
Senior living*
Supermarket foodservice
Hospitals*
10.1%
8.1%
6.5%
4.5%
9.1%
8.3%
6.8%
4.6%
2017 (F) 2018 (F)
Real
14
Inflation assumption: 2.4% for 2017; 2.5% for 2018.*Special inflation rate applied: 1.5% for 2017 & 2018.
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
Nominal
Above average growth segments
2.6%
2.5%
2.1%
2.1%
2.3%
2.4%
2.2%
1.9%
Lodging
Caterers
Fine dining—FSR
College/university*
5.1%
5.0%
4.6%
3.6%
4.9%
5.0%
4.8%
3.4%
2017 (F) 2018 (F)
Real
15
Inflation assumption: 2.4% for 2017; 2.5% for 2018.*Special inflation rate applied: 1.5% for 2017 & 2018.
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
Nominal
Average growth segments
1.8%
1.8%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
1.6%
1.6%
1.3%
Recreation
Transportation*
Long-term care*
C-store foodservice
4.2%
3.3%
3.2%
3.7%
4.3%
3.1%
3.2%
3.8%
2017 (F) 2018 (F)
Real
16
Inflation assumption: 2.4% for 2017; 2.5% for 2018.*Special inflation rate applied: 1.5% for 2017 & 2018.
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
Nominal
Below average growth segments
1.0%
0.9%
0.8%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
B&I*
Other retailers
Fast food—LSR
2.5%
3.3%
3.2%
2.0%
3.0%
3.5%
2017 (F) 2018 (F)
Real
17
Inflation assumption: 2.4% for 2017; 2.5% for 2018.*Special inflation rate applied: 1.5% for 2017 & 2018.
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
Nominal
Lagging segments
0.2%
0.1%
0.1%
-0.5%
-2.0%
0.4%
0.2%
0.2%
-0.3%
-2.0%
K-12
Casual dining—FSR
Bars/taverns
Midscale - FSR
Corrections*
1.7%
2.5%
2.5%
1.9%
-0.5%
1.9%
2.7%
2.7%
2.2%
-0.5%
2017 (F) 2018 (F)
Real
18
Inflation assumption: 2.4% for 2017; 2.5% for 2018.*Special inflation rate applied: 1.5% for 2017 & 2018.
19MENU TRACKER | 2017
Sweetener Attributes & Preferences
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 20
All operator segments are largely consistent when it came to ranking Sugar and Honey first and second in terms of sweetener preference.
Top Sweeteners Among Honey Users
Base: Base variesQ:We’d like to know more about the sweeteners you use in your operation and which are your favorite. Please rank from the following list, your first, second, and third favorite sweetener.
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.0
1.4
Non-calorie …
Molasses
Corn syrup
Maple syrup
Agave nectar
Honey
Sugar
Average RankSugar the top choice among operators, followed by honey
Respondent’s Rank of Honey
Honey Rank Overall LSRs FSRs Catering
Hotel/Lodging/Casino
1st 28% 28% 26% 23% 33%
2nd 47% 47% 44% 55% 47%
3rd 26% 24% 29% 23% 21%
Among operators ranking honey in their top three, hotel/lodging/casinos is the most likely group to rank honey first, with a third of respondents in that category doing so.
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 21
Distribution of Rankings
Base: 535 (All respondents); 443 (Sugar); 497 (Honey); 286 (Non-calorie); 156 (Maple syrup); 84 (Agave nectar); 67 (Corn syrup); 43 (Molasses)Q:We’d like to know more about the sweeteners you use in your operation and which are your favorite. Please rank from the following list, your first, second, and third favorite sweetener.
68%
28%
13%
13%
23%
19%
19%
23%
47%
29%
44%
37%
19%
16%
9%
26%
58%
44%
40%
61%
65%
Sugar
Honey
Non-calorie sweeteners
Maple syrup
Agave nectar
Corn syrup
Molasses
1st 2nd 3rd
Sugar and honey consistently rank first and second respectively in terms of preference.
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 22
Notably, honey did not perform strongly in regards to value, familiarity, and convenience. This may hint that operators are deterred by higher prices and lack proper knowledge on how to use honey effectively.
Top Honey Attributes
Base:535Q:Which of the following attributes do you most associate with honey? (please select up to three)
10%
10%
19%
24%
35%
35%
36%
50%
59%
Convenient
Familiar
A good value
Something new
Premium
Versatile
Nutritious sweetener option
Appealing flavor
Natural/unprocessedHoney valued for its lack of processing and appealing flavor.
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 23
LSRs more strongly associate sugar with all-natural than other groups, with 66% of respondents stating that they associate the sweetener with “wholesome and all-natural.”
Top Sugar Attributes
Base:444 (Respondents ranking sugar in top 3)Q:Which of the following attributes do you most associate with the following sweeteners? Select up to three per column
0%
0%
14%
40%
44%
45%
58%
60%
Other
Nutritious sweetener option
Something new
A good value
Premium
Appealing flavor
Wholesome, all natural
VersatileSugar prized for its versatility and all-natural properties.
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 24
Top Agave Nectar Attributes
Base:85 (Respondents ranking agave nectar in top 3)Q:Which of the following attributes do you most associate with the following sweeteners? Select up to three per column
1%
0%
31%
45%
48%
52%
53%
54%
Other
Nutritious sweetener option
A good value
Versatile
Appealing flavor
Wholesome, all natural
Something new
Premium
Agave nectar strongly associated with premium and new.
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 25
Top Maple Syrup Attributes
Base:157 (Respondents ranking maple syrup in top 3)Q:Which of the following attributes do you most associate with the following sweeteners? Select up to three per column
0%
0%
35%
39%
39%
43%
45%
63%
Other
Nutritious sweetener option
Versatile
Something new
A good value
Premium
Wholesome, all natural
Appealing flavorMaple syrup usage driven by its appealing flavor.
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 26
Top Corn Syrup Attributes
Base:68 (Respondents ranking corn syrup in top 3)Q:Which of the following attributes do you most associate with the following sweeteners? Select up to three per column
1%
0%
25%
40%
43%
46%
53%
54%
Other
Nutritious sweetener option
Wholesome, all natural
Something new
Premium
Appealing flavor
Versatile
A good value
Corn syrup is prized for its value and versatility
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 27
Top Molasses Attributes
Base:44 (Respondents ranking molasses in top 3)Q:Which of the following attributes do you most associate with the following sweeteners? Select up to three per column
0%
0%
34%
36%
39%
39%
52%
55%
Other
Nutritious sweetener option
Wholesome, all natural
Premium
Versatile
Something new
A good value
Appealing flavorFlavor and value are key attributes among molasses’ acceptors
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 28
Top Non-Calorie Sweetener Attributes
Base:287 (Respondents ranking non-calorie sweeteners in top 3)Q:Which of the following attributes do you most associate with the following sweeteners? Select up to three per column
2%
0%
18%
25%
32%
54%
55%
55%
Other
Nutritious sweetener option
Wholesome, all natural
Premium
Versatile
Something new
Appealing flavor
A good valueValue, flavor and newness are key attributes for non-calorie acceptors
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 29
Sweetener ComparisonThis summary of all sweeteners highlights strengths of various sweetener options.
Honey Agave Nectar Maple Syrup Sugar Corn Syrup Molasses Non-Calorie
Sweetener Average
Natural, unprocessed 59% 52% 45% 58% 25% 34% 18% 42%
Appealing flavor 50% 48% 63% 45% 46% 55% 55% 52%
Nutritious sweetener option 36% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5%
Premium 35% 54% 43% 44% 43% 36% 25% 40%
Versatile 35% 45% 35% 60% 53% 39% 32% 43%
Something new 24% 53% 39% 14% 40% 39% 54% 38%
A good value 19% 31% 39% 40% 54% 52% 55% 41%
30MENU TRACKER | 2017
Honey Formats
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 31
Although popular in both segments tabletop is more likely to be the format of choice among LSR operators in comparison to FSRs. Conversely, FSRs are more likely to favor honey in a bulk format. Single-serve honey sees a fair amount of usage across all operations, but is most popular among catering and hotel/lodging/casinos. This is likely due to the wider variety of venue styles that these operations must accommodate.
Formats of Honey Purchased
Base: 535 (All respondents); 205 (LSRs); 205 (FSRs); 50 Catering; 75 (Hotel/lodging/casino)Q:You indicated that you purchase honey. What types of honey do you purchase for your operation?
62%
49%
76%
64%
61%
63%
62%
59%
78%
68%
47%
38%
48%
58%
61%
11%
4%
18%
12%
9%
Overall
LSRs
FSRs
Catering
Hotel/Lodging/Casino
Gallons/bulk honey Tabletop honeySingle serve/portion control honey Dehydrated/powder honey
Bulk and individual bottles are the most frequent purchases
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 32
With use as an ingredient in general cooking, baking, sauces and dressings, bulk honey appears to be used mostly in more complex dishes that require some level of preparation.
Top Ten Bulk Uses
Base: 333 (Bulk honey users)Q:In what applications do you use each honey type in your operation? Please select all that apply.
75%
59%
47%
45%
44%
44%
42%
42%
34%
29%
Cooking ingredient
Baking ingredient
Barbecue or wing sauce
Salad dressing
Drizzle topping ingredient
Ingredient for sauces, spreads or glazes
Marinade/brine
Meat or seafood glaze
Ingredient in bakery items
Compound butter / honey butter
Bulk honey widely used in back-of-house applications
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 33
This is likely driven by the ease-of-use of this format, and its suitability towards being used as a self-serve sweetener for beverages.
Top Ten Tabletop Uses
Base: 339 (Tabletop honey users)Q:In what applications do you use each honey type in your operation? Please select all that apply.
50%
32%
31%
30%
25%
24%
24%
23%
22%
22%
Beverage sweeter for non-alcoholic beverages
Drizzle topping ingredient
Beverage sweetener for alcoholic beverages
Baking ingredient
Cooking ingredient
Ingredient for sauces, spreads or glazes
Salad dressing
Single ingredient dipping sauce/spread
Meat or seafood glaze
Barbecue or wing sauce
Tabletop honey primarily used as beverage sweetener or a topping
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 34
As with the tabletop honey, this preference is possibly being driven by this formats ability to be used as a self-serve sweetener in the front-of-house.
Top Ten Single Serve Uses
Base: 250 (Single-serve honey users)Q:In what applications do you use each honey type in your operation? Please select all that apply.
62%
36%
36%
27%
18%
16%
15%
15%
15%
14%
Beverage sweeter for non-alcoholic beverages
Beverage sweetener for alcoholic beverages
Single ingredient dipping sauce/spread
Drizzle topping ingredient
Dessert
Appetizer
Ingredient for sauces, spreads or glazes
Salad dressing
Ingredient in bakery items
Barbecue or wing sauce
Single serve primarily used for non-alcoholic beverages
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 35
Among operators using powdered honey, no single application dominates in terms of usage.
Top Ten Powder Uses
Base: 59 (Dehydrated/powder honey users)Q:In what applications do you use each honey type in your operation? Please select all that apply.
32%
31%
31%
29%
29%
29%
25%
25%
24%
22%
Beverage sweetener for alcoholic beverages
Baking ingredient
Beverage sweeter for non-alcoholic beverages
Cooking ingredient
Ingredient for sauces, spreads or glazes
Barbecue or wing sauce
Single ingredient dipping sauce/spread
Ingredient in pizza dough or flatbreads
Baked good
Meat or seafood glaze
Powder used in a wide variety of settings
36MENU TRACKER | 2017
Sweetener Usage & Perceptions
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
91%
85%
60%
47%
41%
35%
33%
Sugar
Honey
Non-calorie sweetener
Maple syrup
Agave nectar
Corn syrup
Molasses
Versatility(Top Three Box)
92%
81%
60%
46%
39%
35%
35%
Sugar
Honey
Non-calorie sweetener
Maple syrup
Agave nectar
Corn syrup
Molasses
Effectiveness/Preference(Top Three Box)
37
Effectivenessand Versatility
Base: 535 (All respondents)Q:On a scale of 1 (not preferred) to 9 (highly preferred), how do you rate the following sweeteners in terms of effectiveness as a sweetener in recipes? Q:On a scale of 1 (not versatile) to 9 (highly versatile), how do you rate the following sweeteners in terms of versatility for use in recipes?
Sugar and honey highly rated in both attributes
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 38
Suited for Front-of-House Usage
Base: 535 (All respondents)Q:Thinking about your customers, on a scale of 1 (not preferred) to 9 (highly preferred), how do you rate the following sweeteners in terms of sweeteners used front of house by your patrons?
92%
83%
78%
47%
36%
32%
28%
Sugar
Honey
Non-calorie sweetener
Maple syrup
Agave nectar
Molasses
Corn syrup
Usefulness in the Front of House(Top Three Box)
Sugar and honey are the top choices for FOH sweeteners
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 39
Notably LSRs over indexed on reasons pertaining related to a lack of knowledge on honey and how to source it. For example, 35% of LSRs felt that honey is difficult to source, and 35% of LSRs stated they didn’t know how to use honey as an ingredient.
Top Reasons for Honey Rejection
Base:535 (All respondents)Q:Which of the following reasons might you avoid using honey? (please select up to three)
47%
42%
29%
28%
28%
26%
26%
9%
2%
Cost relative to other sweeteners
My patrons don’t demand it
Unsure which products to buy
Difficulty sourcing
Honey is inconvenient to use
Inconsistent flavor
I don’t know how to use honey as an ingredient for baking or cooking
It doesn't occur to me to use honey
Other
Price and consumer demand the top reasons to avoid honey
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 40
Many operators agree that has a presence in both front-of-house and back-of-house.
Most Relevant Sentiment
Base:535 (All respondents)Q:Please select the most relevant message about honey as it relates to your usage…
35%
16%
13%
13%
8%
5%
4%
2%
1%
1%
1%
An all natural option
A good alternative to sweeteners back-of-house
A good alternative to sweeteners front-of-house
Can be used in a variety of menu applications
Customers increasingly prefer it over other sweeteners
Can be used as a binder and thickener for sauces, dressings, marinades and …
Slightly sweeter than sugar, so less can be used to achieve the same sweetness
Keeps baked goods moist and extends shelf life
There are more than 300 unique varietals in the United States
Comes in a variety of forms including comb, liquid, crystallized, and whipped
Easily dissolvable in beverages
Honey’s all-natural attributes resonate strongest with operators
41MENU TRACKER | 2017
Honey Usage
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
Current Usage Vs. Last Year
Base: 535 (All respondents); 205 (LSRs); 205 (FSRs); 50 Catering; 75 (Hotel/lodging/casino)Q:How does your honey volume usage this year compare with last year? Are you using more, about the same, or less than you were a year ago? Note:
24%
17%
34%
18%
24%
4%
4%
2%
12%
5%
71%
79%
64%
70%
71%
Overall
LSRs
FSRs
Catering
Hotel/Lodging/Casino
More Less Same
42
Majority of operators using the same amount of honey as last yearFSRs are the most likely to have used an increase amount of honey over the past year. Conversely, catering operations are the most likely to have decreased their total usage.Among respondents who increased their usage of honey over the past year, the most common reason is an increase in consumer demand. Following that, increasing the number of dishes that use honey and consumers perceptions about the health benefits are top cited reasons for an increase.Although few respondents reported a decrease in their honey consumption, price is by far the most cited reason for a decrease.In addition to price, other reasons for decreased usage include the availability of substitutes, particularly when using back of house.
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
Anticipated Use Over Next Year
Base: 535 (All respondents); 205 (LSRs); 205 (FSRs); 50 Catering; 75 (Hotel/lodging/casino)Q:In the next 12 months, do you expect your usage of honey will… Note:
16%
14%
20%
10%
13%
2%
1%
2%
6%
4%
82%
85%
78%
84%
83%
Overall
LSRs
FSRs
Catering
Hotel/Lodging/Casino
More Less Same
43
Operators expect to be consistent in honey usage over the next year
FSRs are the most likely to believe they will increase their usage, and catering the most likely to expect a decrease.• Top reasons cited for increased usage
include: using honey as a substitute for other sweeteners, to add variety, menu item innovation/expansion • Top reasons cited for decreased usage
include: other sweeteners as an alternative, discontinued menu items or shift in purchasing
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
Current Usage as a Sweetener Substitute
Base: 535 (All respondents); 205 (LSRs); 205 (FSRs); 50 Catering; 75 (Hotel/lodging/casino)Q:Do you currently use honey as a substitute for other sweeteners in your recipes? Note:
77%
81%
72%
78%
80%
23%
19%
28%
22%
20%
Overall
LSRs
FSRs
Catering
Hotel/Lodging/Casino
Yes No
Although all segments are likely to be using honey as a substitute for other sweeteners, FSRs is least likely to be doing so and LSRs the most likely.
44
Honey sees widespread usage as a sweetener substitute in all segments
45MENU TRACKER | 2017
Appendix
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 46
Operation Type
Base:Q:Note:
38%
38%
9%
14%
LSRs FSRs Catering Hotel/Lodging/Casino
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 47
Type of LSR
Base: 205 (LSRs)Q:Which of the following best describes your store? Note:
55%
45%
Fast food/traditional QSR
Fast casual/upscale quick service restaurant
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 48
LSR Menu Type
Base: 205 (LSRs)Q: Which menu type best describes your restaurant? Note:
14%
14%
12%
11% 9%
8%
8%
7%
6%
5% 4% 1%
Family Steak Other SandwichHamburger ChickenCafeteria/Buffet Coffee & Other BeveragePizza Frozen DessertsMexican AsianDonut Other
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 49
Type of FSR
Base: 205 (FSRs)Q:Which of the following best describes your restaurant? Note:
53% 36%
11%
Casual dining establishment
Polished/upscale casual dining establishment
Fine dining establishment
© 2017 Technomic Inc. 50
FSR Menu Type
Base: 205 (LSRs)Q:Which menu type best describes your restaurant?
59%
9%
9%
8%
8%
5% 2% 1%
Varied menu Seafood Steak ItalianMexican Other ethnic Asian Other
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
426
595
During Week
During Weekend
Average Number of Guests Served in Day
26%
74%
Chain vs. Independent
Chain Independent
70%
95%
92%
40%
Breakfast
Lunch
Dinner
Late night
Dayparts Open
20% 18%
36% 13%
6% 7%
1-3 4-10
11-100 101-250
251-500 500+
Number of Units in Chain
Number of Units
51
Operator Characteristics
Base:535 (All respondents); 141 (Chains)Q:About how many people do you serve at this location on a typical day?Q:For which dayparts is your operation open? Select all that apply.
© 2017 Technomic Inc.
Under $50k
$50k - $99k
$100k - $249k
$250k - $499k
$500k - $749k
$750 - $1M
$1M - $2M
$2M - $4M
$4M+
Annual Spend on Food and Non-Alcoholic Beverages
42%
42%
16%
Level of Purchasing Influence
Has sole responsibility for purchasing decisions
Has significant input into the decision
Shares responsibility equally with others
36%
19% 19%
11%
7% 6% 3%
Primary Role
General ManagerOwnerFood and Beverage DirectorFoodservice DirectorPurchasing DirectorChefNutrition Director/Dietician
52
Base:535 (All respondents)Q:Approximately how much do you spend each year on food and non-alcoholic beverages? Q:What is your primary role? Q:What is your level of influence over the food, beverages, disposables and supplies you purchase for your foodservice operation? Select one.
Operator Characteristics