forecasting technological change (2)

74
06/20/22 1 Forecasting Technological Forecasting Technological Change Change Session 2. Trend Analysis Session 2. Trend Analysis Paul A. Schumann, Jr. Paul A. Schumann, Jr. Glocal Vantage, Inc. Glocal Vantage, Inc.

Upload: paul-schumann

Post on 29-Apr-2015

2.892 views

Category:

Technology


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Part two of a five part seminar on technology forecasting, tools, techniques and processes. Part four covers the trend analysis techniques.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 1

Forecasting Technological ChangeForecasting Technological Change

Session 2. Trend AnalysisSession 2. Trend AnalysisPaul A. Schumann, Jr.Paul A. Schumann, Jr.

Glocal Vantage, Inc.Glocal Vantage, Inc.

Page 2: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 2

SessionsSessions

• IntroductionIntroduction

• Trend Analysis TechniquesTrend Analysis Techniques

• Expert Opinion TechniquesExpert Opinion Techniques

• Integrative TechniquesIntegrative Techniques

• ClosingClosing

Page 3: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 3

SessionsSessions

• IntroductionIntroduction

• Trend Analysis TechniquesTrend Analysis Techniques

• Expert Opinion TechniquesExpert Opinion Techniques

• Integrative TechniquesIntegrative Techniques

• ClosingClosing

Page 4: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 4

2. Trend Analysis Techniques2. Trend Analysis Techniques

• Shape of S-CurveShape of S-Curve• Dependent on utility functionDependent on utility function• Based on historical data Based on historical data

(time or experience)(time or experience)• Not causalNot causal• ReproducibleReproducible• Requires analysis of driving Requires analysis of driving

forcesforces

If you don’t know where you If you don’t know where you are, and how you got there, are, and how you got there,

how can you possibly how can you possibly know where you are going?know where you are going?

Abe LincolnAbe Lincoln

Page 5: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 5

TechniquesTechniques

• AnalogyAnalogy

• Precursor DevelopmentsPrecursor Developments

• Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation

• Limit CurveLimit Curve

• Learning CurveLearning Curve

• Substitution AnalysisSubstitution Analysis

• Multiple Substitution AnalysisMultiple Substitution Analysis

Page 6: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 6

TechniquesTechniques

• AnalogyAnalogy

• Precursor DevelopmentsPrecursor Developments

• Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation

• Limit CurveLimit Curve

• Learning CurveLearning Curve

• Substitution AnalysisSubstitution Analysis

• Multiple Substitution AnalysisMultiple Substitution Analysis

Page 7: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 7

Economic Maturation of TechnologyEconomic Maturation of Technology

• Nonproductive (25 years)Nonproductive (25 years)

• Counter Productive (25 years)Counter Productive (25 years)

• Hyperproductive and Transformational Hyperproductive and Transformational (25 years)(25 years)

Page 8: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 8

Future ForecastFuture Forecast

• First Industrial Revolution (1760 - 1860)First Industrial Revolution (1760 - 1860)

• Second Industrial Revolution (1860 - Second Industrial Revolution (1860 - 1950)1950)

• Third Industrial Revolution (1950 - Third Industrial Revolution (1950 - 2020)2020)

Page 9: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 9

Nature of WorkNature of Work

Source: Snyder, et al, “The Strategic Context of Educationin America 2000 - 2020

Page 10: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 10

Information TechnologyInformation Technology

Source: Jeremy Greenwood, The Third Industrial Revolution

Page 11: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 11

Third IR TechnologiesThird IR Technologies

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Telephone

TV

Transistor

Electronic Computer

Programming

Fiber Optics

IC

Sattelite Communications

Internet

PC

Cell Phones

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Age (years)

195019752000

NPCPHP

2025

DP

Page 12: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 12

TechniquesTechniques

• AnalogyAnalogy

• Precursor DevelopmentsPrecursor Developments

• Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation

• Limit CurveLimit Curve

• Learning CurveLearning Curve

• Substitution AnalysisSubstitution Analysis

• Multiple Substitution AnalysisMultiple Substitution Analysis

Page 13: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 13

PrecursorPrecursor

Time (Effort, Experience)

Util

ityF

unct

ion

Page 14: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 14

Precursor ExamplePrecursor Example

Source: Ralph Lenz,TFI

Page 15: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 15

Precursor AnalysisPrecursor Analysis

• Identify lead-lag relationshipIdentify lead-lag relationship

• Obtain lead-lag dataObtain lead-lag data

• Decide whether lead-lag relationship will Decide whether lead-lag relationship will continuecontinue

• Causal connections are bestCausal connections are best

• Similar control factors are next bestSimilar control factors are next best

• Accidental relationships are misleadingAccidental relationships are misleading

Page 16: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 16

TechniquesTechniques

• AnalogyAnalogy

• Precursor DevelopmentsPrecursor Developments

• Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation

• Limit CurveLimit Curve

• Learning CurveLearning Curve

• Substitution AnalysisSubstitution Analysis

• Multiple Substitution AnalysisMultiple Substitution Analysis

Page 17: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 17

Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation• IfIf

– Technical parameter has utilityTechnical parameter has utility– Market continues to value utilityMarket continues to value utility– Driving forces remain sameDriving forces remain same– Not approaching limitNot approaching limit

• ThenThen– Most technologies follow a pattern of constant Most technologies follow a pattern of constant

percentage increasepercentage increase

– y = yy = y00eemt mt i.ei.e..(log y = log y(log y = log y00 + m t+ m t ) (natural log)) (natural log)

Page 18: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 18

Trend AnalysisTrend Analysis

Source: Ralph Lenz, TFI

Page 19: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 19

First Technology Trend ForecastFirst Technology Trend Forecast

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965

Year

Nu

mb

er o

f E

lect

ron

ic C

om

po

ne

nt

Par

ts

(Th

ou

san

ds

)

B-58

B-52

B-47

B-50B-29B-17 Glocal Vantage, Inc.

Page 20: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 20

Internet UsersInternet Users

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Year

Inte

rne

t U

se

rs (

WW

, M

illi

on

s)

eTForecasts(2000)

ComputerIndustryAlmanac(2000)

ComputerIndustryAlmanac(1998)

Tapscott(1996)

USDOC(1999)

Page 21: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 21

Internet UsersInternet Users

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

Year

Inte

rne

t U

ser

s W

orl

dw

ide

(M

illio

ns)

eTForecasts (2000)

Computer Industry Almanac(2000)

Computer Industry Almanac(1999)

Tapscott (1996)

US DOC (1999)

Trend Analysis (2001)

World's Population

World's Population

Glocal Vantage, Inc.

Page 22: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 22

Internet Users AnalysisInternet Users Analysis

• GrowthGrowth– 114% increase per year114% increase per year– doubling time = 11 monthsdoubling time = 11 months

• Surpass world’s population in 2005Surpass world’s population in 2005

• Is it a utility function?Is it a utility function?

• Limits to growth?Limits to growth?

• What’s a user? What’s a user?

Page 23: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 23

IC ExampleIC Example

www. intel.com/research/silicon/mooreslaw.htm

Page 24: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 24

Microprocessor SpeedMicroprocessor Speed

Source: TFI (1990)

Page 25: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 25

Evolution of Computer PowerEvolution of Computer Power

Source: Hans Moravec

Page 26: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 26

Information Revolution?Information Revolution?

Source: Schumann (1982)

Page 27: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 27

Genetic SequencingGenetic Sequencing

Source:www.ncbi.nih.gov/Genbank/genbankstats.html

Page 28: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 28

Genetic SequencesGenetic Sequences

100

1,000

10,000

100,000

1,000,000

10,000,000

100,000,000

1982 1987 1992 1997 2002

Year

Nu

mb

er o

f S

equ

ence

s (m

illio

ns)

Doubling every 17 monthsSource: Enriquez

Page 29: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 29

Chromosome MappingChromosome Mapping

Source: www.ornl.gov/hgmis/posters/chromosome

Page 30: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 30

Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation• Specify assumptionsSpecify assumptions• Include quantitative evidenceInclude quantitative evidence• Follow logical approachFollow logical approach• Use prior rates of improvement unlessUse prior rates of improvement unless

– There is a limitThere is a limit– Utility is changingUtility is changing– Approach is changingApproach is changing– Driving forces are changingDriving forces are changing

• Document reasonsDocument reasons• Useful to develop alternative projectionsUseful to develop alternative projections• Provide a basis for rational discussionProvide a basis for rational discussion

Page 31: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 31

TechniquesTechniques

• AnalogyAnalogy

• Precursor DevelopmentsPrecursor Developments

• Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation

• Limit CurveLimit Curve

• Learning CurveLearning Curve

• Substitution AnalysisSubstitution Analysis

• Multiple Substitution AnalysisMultiple Substitution Analysis

Page 32: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 32

Limit CurveLimit Curve

• Organic growth modelOrganic growth model• Often used when technology approaches a Often used when technology approaches a

natural limitnatural limit• Limit may not be realLimit may not be real• Use limit and make forecastUse limit and make forecast• Review limit - real?Review limit - real?• Shifts usually occur as limit is approached if Shifts usually occur as limit is approached if

utility still existsutility still exists

Page 33: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 33

Growth CurveGrowth Curve

Source: Alan Porter

Page 34: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 34

Limit CurveLimit Curve

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Year

Eg

gs/

Ch

icke

n Y

ear

Page 35: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 35

Limit CurveLimit Curve

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Year

Eg

gs/

Ch

icke

n Y

ear

Page 36: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 36

Limit CurveLimit Curve

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Year

Eg

gs/

Ch

icke

n Y

ear

Page 37: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 37

Limit CurveLimit Curve

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Year

Eg

gs/

Ch

icke

n Y

ear

Page 38: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 38

Limit CurveLimit Curve

• Pearl curvePearl curve

• y = L / (1+a e y = L / (1+a e -bt-bt))

• L = 350L = 350

• a = 1.71a = 1.71

• b = .038b = .038

• t = 0 in 1937t = 0 in 1937

Page 39: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 39

Internet UsersInternet Users

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Year

Nu

mb

er (

mill

ion

s)

Data

Forecast

Page 40: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 40

Limit CurvesLimit Curves

• PearlPearl

• Fisher-PryFisher-Pry

• GompertzGompertz

• BertalanffyBertalanffy

Page 41: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 41

Limit CurvesLimit Curves

• PearlPearl

• Fisher-PryFisher-Pry

• GompertzGompertz

• BertalanffyBertalanffy

y = L / (1 + a exp (- b t))y = L / (1 + 10(A - B t))

L = limita = controls locationb = controls shape

Page 42: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 42

Limit CurvesLimit Curves

• PearlPearl

• Fisher-PryFisher-Pry

• GompertzGompertz

• BertalanffyBertalanffy

f = 1/2 (1 + tanh a (t - t0))

f = fraction of applications in which the new technology has been substituted for the oldt0 = time for 50% substitutiona = controls shape

Page 43: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 43

Limit CurvesLimit Curves

• PearlPearl

• Fisher-PryFisher-Pry

• GompertzGompertz

• BertalanffyBertalanffy

Y = L exp (- b exp ( - k t))

Non symmetrical

Page 44: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 44

Limit CurvesLimit Curves

• PearlPearl

• Fisher-PryFisher-Pry

• GompertzGompertz

• BertalanffyBertalanffy

y = L + (y0 - L) exp (- b t)

L = limity0 = initial valueb = controls shape of curve

Page 45: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 45

Envelope CurveEnvelope Curve

Source: Ralph Lenz, TFI

Page 46: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 46

ScanningScanning

Page 47: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 47

Envelope CurveEnvelope Curve

Source: TFI 1983

Page 48: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 48

TechniquesTechniques

• AnalogyAnalogy

• Precursor DevelopmentsPrecursor Developments

• Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation

• Limit CurveLimit Curve

• Learning CurveLearning Curve

• Substitution AnalysisSubstitution Analysis

• Multiple Substitution AnalysisMultiple Substitution Analysis

Page 49: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 49

Learning CurveLearning Curve

• Some improvements can be forecast Some improvements can be forecast better based on experience rather than better based on experience rather than time.time.

• Frequently production costs follow this Frequently production costs follow this type of relationshiptype of relationship

• y = a xy = a x- b- b

• log y = log a - b log xlog y = log a - b log x

Page 50: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 50

Learning CurveLearning Curve

• Frequently experience is equivalent to Frequently experience is equivalent to cumulative production quantity cumulative production quantity

• Usually expressed as percent Usually expressed as percent improvement for each doubling of improvement for each doubling of experienceexperience– 5% cost reduction in 2x5% cost reduction in 2x– 95% learning curve95% learning curve

Page 51: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 51

Learning Curve ExampleLearning Curve Example

Source: Porter

Page 52: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 52

Residential Electric Power Learning CurveResidential Electric Power Learning Curve

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 4.000

Log (cumulative residential consumption in terawatt hours)

Lo

g (

cen

ts p

er k

ilo

wat

t h

ou

r in

196

7 d

oll

ars

)

Data

1915

1920

1925

1930

1935

19401945

19501955

19601965

1970

Page 53: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 53

Residential Electric Power Learning CurveResidential Electric Power Learning Curve

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.500

Log (cumulative residential consumption in terawatt hours)

Lo

g (

cen

ts p

er k

ilo

wat

t h

ou

r in

196

7 d

oll

ars

)

Data

Forecast

1915

1920

1925

1930

1935

1940

1945

1950

1955

1960

1965

19701975

1980

1985

66% Learning Curve

Page 54: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 54

Residential Electric Power Learning CurveResidential Electric Power Learning Curve

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.500

Log (cumulative residential consumption in terawatt hours)

Lo

g (

cen

ts p

er k

ilo

wat

t h

ou

r in

196

7 d

oll

ars

)

Data

Forecast

1915

1920

1925

1930

1935

1940

1945

1950

1955

1960

1965

19701975

1980

1985

Page 55: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 55

TechniquesTechniques

• AnalogyAnalogy

• Precursor DevelopmentsPrecursor Developments

• Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation

• Limit CurveLimit Curve

• Learning CurveLearning Curve

• Substitution AnalysisSubstitution Analysis

• Multiple Substitution AnalysisMultiple Substitution Analysis

Page 56: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 56

Fisher-Pry Substitution AnalysisFisher-Pry Substitution Analysis

• f = 1/2 (1 + tanh a (t - tf = 1/2 (1 + tanh a (t - t00))))

• f = fraction of applications in which f = fraction of applications in which the new technology has been the new technology has been substituted for the oldsubstituted for the old

• tt00 = time for 50% substitution = time for 50% substitution

• a = controls shapea = controls shape

Page 57: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 57

Shape of Fisher-Pry CurvesShape of Fisher-Pry Curves

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Time Units

Rat

io (

new

/ o

ld)

t0 = 3

a = 0.5

a = 1

a = 1.5

Page 58: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 58

Substitution of Steam for SailSubstitution of Steam for Sail

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980

Year

Ste

am

Gro

ss

To

nn

ag

e

Steam

Sail

Page 59: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 59

Steam/Sail Fisher-Pry SubstitutionSteam/Sail Fisher-Pry Substitution

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

Year

Ste

am

/Sa

il

Data

Fisher-Pry Model

Page 60: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 60

CATV Substitution in USCATV Substitution in US

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Year

Ho

me

s w

ith

CA

TV

/Ho

me

s w

ith

ou

t C

AT

V (

US

)

Data

Forecast

Source: Martino, 1983

Page 61: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 61

CATV Substitution (US)CATV Substitution (US)

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Year

Ho

mes

wit

h C

AT

V/H

om

es w

ith

ou

t C

AT

V (

US

)

Data (1994, 1996)

Forecast

Data (1980)

Page 62: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 62

Telecommunication Technology SubstitutionTelecommunication Technology Substitution

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

Year

Sto

red

Pro

gra

m/E

ctr

om

ech

an

ica

l

Data

Forecast

Source: Lenz & Vanston, TFI 1986

Page 63: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 63

Telecommunications Substitution AnalysisTelecommunications Substitution Analysis

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Stored Program % of Total Market

Ele

ctro

me

chan

ica

l Sys

tem

s (

mill

ion

s o

f su

bsc

rib

ers

)

ElectromechanicalMarket

Total MarketGrowth Rate

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

Total Market Annual Growth Rate

Page 64: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 64

TechniquesTechniques

• AnalogyAnalogy

• Precursor DevelopmentsPrecursor Developments

• Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation

• Limit CurveLimit Curve

• Learning CurveLearning Curve

• Substitution AnalysisSubstitution Analysis

• Multiple Substitution AnalysisMultiple Substitution Analysis

Page 65: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 65

Multiple Substitution AnalysisMultiple Substitution Analysis

• Requires a more generalized Requires a more generalized substitution modelsubstitution model

• Lotka-Volterra equationLotka-Volterra equation– dXdXn n / dt = X/ dt = Xnn M Mnn(X(Xnn) = growth in technology) = growth in technology

– X = existing levels of technologyX = existing levels of technology– M(X) = market potentialM(X) = market potential

= a= an n - b- bnn X - c X - cnn Y Y

Page 66: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 66

Multiple Substitution ExampleMultiple Substitution Example

Source: Porter

Page 67: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 67

Comparison of ModelsComparison of ModelsModel Equation Growth Conditions

Linear X = A t + B dX/dt = A Slow growth, shorttime periods

Exponential X = exp(A t) dX/dt = A X Constantpercentage growth

Pearl X = A / (1+B exp(-C t)) dX/dt = X (-A - C X) Modeltechnologies thathave similargrowth rates

Gompertz X = A exp(-C exp(-D t)) dX/dt = C X exp(-A t) Models oldertechnologygrowing obsolete

Source: Porter

Page 68: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 68

SummarySummary

• Trend analysis has strong historical Trend analysis has strong historical validationvalidation

• Models have been accepted but not Models have been accepted but not explainedexplained

• QuantitativeQuantitative

• Does not explain how change will occurDoes not explain how change will occur

• Often misused and misunderstoodOften misused and misunderstood

Page 69: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 69

Summary (cont.)Summary (cont.)

• First noticed by Henry Adams in 1918First noticed by Henry Adams in 1918

• ““Knowledge begets knowledge as Knowledge begets knowledge as money begets interest.” - Arthur Conan money begets interest.” - Arthur Conan DoyleDoyle

Page 70: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 70

IC Line WidthIC Line Width

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Year

Ine

Wid

th (

mic

rom

ete

rs)

Data

Forecast

Page 71: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

04/11/23 71

Trend AnalysisTrend Analysis

• AnalogyAnalogy• Precursor Precursor

DevelopmentsDevelopments• Trend ExtrapolationTrend Extrapolation• Limit CurveLimit Curve• Learning CurveLearning Curve• Substitution AnalysisSubstitution Analysis• Multiple Substitution Multiple Substitution

AnalysisAnalysis

Data, InsightData, InsightSurveillance Material

ChangeChangeTrend Analysis

Formal

Page 72: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

72

Glocal Vantage, Inc.Glocal Vantage, Inc.

• PO Box 161475PO Box 161475

• Austin, TX 78716Austin, TX 78716

• (512) 632-6586(512) 632-6586

[email protected]@glocalvantage.com

• www.glocalvantage.com

• http://incollaboration.com

• Twitter: innovant2003Twitter: innovant200304/11/23

Page 73: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

Paul SchumannPaul Schumann

• Futurist and innovation consultantFuturist and innovation consultant• Application of web 2.0 to market & strategic Application of web 2.0 to market & strategic

intelligence systemsintelligence systems• Web 2.0 tools & technologiesWeb 2.0 tools & technologies• Application of web 2.0 to democratic processesApplication of web 2.0 to democratic processes• Broad perspectives on the futureBroad perspectives on the future• ServicesServices

– Strategic market research & technology forecastingStrategic market research & technology forecasting– Intelligence systems consultingIntelligence systems consulting– Seminars, webinars & presentationsSeminars, webinars & presentations

7304/11/23

Page 74: Forecasting Technological Change (2)

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution

license. You may distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon this work,

even commercially, as long as you credit me for the original creation as Paul Schumann, Glocal Vantage

Inc, www.glocalvantage.com.

04/11/23 74