from mind to brain machine the architecture of cognition david davenport computer eng. dept.,...

9
From Mind to Brain Machine The Architecture of Cognition David Davenport Computer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University, 06533 Ankara – Turkey. email: [email protected] http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~david

Upload: grant-davidson

Post on 18-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: From Mind to Brain Machine The Architecture of Cognition David Davenport Computer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University, 06533 Ankara – Turkey. email: david@bilkent.edu.tr

From Mind to Brain Machine

The Architecture of Cognition

David DavenportComputer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University,

06533 Ankara – Turkey.email: [email protected]

http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~david

Page 2: From Mind to Brain Machine The Architecture of Cognition David Davenport Computer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University, 06533 Ankara – Turkey. email: david@bilkent.edu.tr

Introduction Mind

conscious, aware, feeling, understanding, emotional, intelligent…

& Brain blob of gray matter, chemicals…

How do they work? Ask, Why Minds? Map solution space Look at plausible alternatives

Page 3: From Mind to Brain Machine The Architecture of Cognition David Davenport Computer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University, 06533 Ankara – Turkey. email: david@bilkent.edu.tr

What Purpose Do Minds Serve?

Physical basis Evolution produced brains Why? homeostasis

Maintain mental model of environment Simulation, multi-level, decoupled Include other agents & itself!

External representations Label model “I” or “me” Talking to ourselves

Greater capacity, longer term, … more successful?

Page 4: From Mind to Brain Machine The Architecture of Cognition David Davenport Computer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University, 06533 Ankara – Turkey. email: david@bilkent.edu.tr

Implementing Minds Represent, store, & manipulate info. Computationalism Physical Symbol System

Intensionality? Symbol Grounding

“If, in principle, syntactic relations can be made to parallel semantic relations, and if, in principle, you could have mechanisms whose operations on formulas are sensitive to their syntax, then it may be possible to construct a syntactically driven machine whose state transitions satisfy semantical criteria of coherence.” {Fodor & Pylyshyn}

Page 5: From Mind to Brain Machine The Architecture of Cognition David Davenport Computer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University, 06533 Ankara – Turkey. email: david@bilkent.edu.tr

Implementing Minds (2) Alternatives

ANN’s, Hybrid, Recurrent ANN’s & Dynamical systems?

Computation (modeling) “Abstract spec. of causal structure…”

Representation Observer-relative Prediction - meaning for the agent

Page 6: From Mind to Brain Machine The Architecture of Cognition David Davenport Computer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University, 06533 Ankara – Turkey. email: david@bilkent.edu.tr

Implementing Brains Symbolic vs. ANN

Both computational & use same technology

Difference? Copy vs. link storage Conjunction vs. disjunction

Require Active/inactive, in/out of construction

Page 7: From Mind to Brain Machine The Architecture of Cognition David Davenport Computer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University, 06533 Ankara – Turkey. email: david@bilkent.edu.tr

Recognition, expectations, anticipation decision, record cycle interaction

Possibilities Combining computations

Feedback loops or activation states Sequences

Feedback, delays or inhibition View-based or generative models Generating expectations Decoupling

Alternatives

Page 8: From Mind to Brain Machine The Architecture of Cognition David Davenport Computer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University, 06533 Ankara – Turkey. email: david@bilkent.edu.tr

Alternatives (2) Language understanding

Word – object Sentence pattern - situation

Page 9: From Mind to Brain Machine The Architecture of Cognition David Davenport Computer Eng. Dept., Bilkent University, 06533 Ankara – Turkey. email: david@bilkent.edu.tr

Concluding Remarks Brain too complex without “blueprint” Ask function, Enumerate solutions,

(Re)-Examine evidence Too much information! Need Theory – (thinner textbooks) More Interdisciplinary? Brain is “dirty” (multiple solutions)

the mystery of cognition remains