fs con. katitisan-cabpangi rd..doc

LIBUNGAN, NORTH COTABATOLIBUNGAN, NORTH COTABATO

FEASIBILITY STUDY FEASIBILITY STUDY

I.I. PROJECT IDENTIFYING INFORMATION:PROJECT IDENTIFYING INFORMATION:

A. Project Title : Concreting Portion of Cabpangi-Katitisan Road.

B. Project Location : Barangay Cabpangi & Gumaga, Libungan, Cotabato

C. Type of Project : All Weather Road

D. Project Scale/Dimension Net Length = 1.0 km, Roadbed width= 6.0 mPavement width = 4.0 m

E. Project Proponent : Local Government Unit of Libungan

F. Implementing Unit : Office of the Municipal Engineer

G. Income Classification : 2nd Class Municipality

H. Total Number of Barangays : 20 Barangays

I. Mode of Implementation : By Contract

J Direct Road Influence Area : 170 hectares

Barangay No. of Hectares Major CropsCabpangi 225.70 Corn, Coconut, Rice, Banana & Mango

Gumaga 642.00 Corn, Coconut, Rice, Banana & Mango

Source: MAO,Libungan

K. Project Beneficiaries : 3,993 total population; Male=2,135, Female=1,858 861 households

L. Total Project Cost and Cost Sharing : PhP 6,152.006.32LP (80%) : PhP 4,921,605.05LGU Equity (10%) : PhP 615,200.63GOP (10%) : PhP 615,200.63

M. Based on the study, the project is feasible from marketing, technical, economic and operational viewpoint.

NPV =Php 3,745@15%B/C Ratio =1.67EIRR =32.4%

Concreting Portion of Cabpangi-Katitisan Road


II. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

A. Name of Municipality

The proposed project as identified herein is located in the Municipality of Libungan, Province of Cotabato.

B. Location

1. Geographical Boundaries

The municipality of Libungan is located on the North-Western portion of the province of Cotabato. It is bounded on the North by the Municipality of Alamada; on the South by the Municipalities of Midsayap and Kabuntalan; on the East of Municipality of Carmen and by the Municipality of Pigcawayn on the West.

It is by the 124 degrees, 31 minutes latitude and 7 degrees 15 minutes’ longitude. It is approximately 40 kilometers from Cotabato City and about 70 kilometers from the capital town of Kidapawan. The Poblacion is 7 kilometers from the Municipality of Midsayap, the mother Municipality.

The Quezon Mac Arthur Highway (Cotabato-Davao-Road) and Libungan-Alamada-Bukidnon Road made Libungan accessible from Davao and Cotabato City and Bukidnon. Libungan is also at the heart of the PALMA Alliance.

2. Relative Distance to Growth and Commercial Centers

The Municipality is accessible through land transportation. The presence of a world-class National Highway that traverses the three (3) coastal barangays, and the well-maintained provincial/ municipal/barangay roads provide comfort and convenience to commuters, riders and motorist.

The Municipality of Libungan is strategically located along the crossroads of major thoroughfares, namely the Cotabato-Davao Highway and the Cotabato- Cagayan Dee Oro City via Bukidnon Highway. The Cotabato-Davao Highway is already a concrete pavement, while only a potion of the Bukidnon- Cotabato Highway is concrete, especially Libungan section. Thus highways traversing the municipality is already concreted making travels smooth and safe.

3. Existing Road Transport Network and Physical Condition

The existing barangay roads 111.04 kms. And 32,672 kms of which are earth roads, 43.30 kms. Are gravel road and 1.07 kms. were concrete. With regards to bridges along barangay roads, 180 LM are hanging bridges,48 LM are concrete 39 LM are bailey, 42 LM are RCBC and 24 LM are timber. Along municipal road/streets, there are 8 bridges composed of Siphon (NIA) and RCBC with a total of 8 LM. Municipal roads have a total length of 12.255 kms, majority of which are gravel.

4. Availability of Public Transport

The most common public transformation facility in the municipality is the motorized trisikad and tricycles. Operators of these transport facilities secures permits from the LGU, thus are registered in the LGU rosted (Table 48). Other public transportation facilities plying from and to other barangays within the municipality and adjacent municipalities are the skylab, (motorcycle for ride), the multi-cab PUV’s, PUL’s, L300 Vans and bushes like the WEENA/NCTC. Aside from this, there are



numerous private motorcycles, automobiles (cars & jeeps), cargo trucks, farm trailers and bicycles in the municipality. Table 49 shows the respective distances of component barangays from the town center and corresponding travel time. The farthest barangay is Kitubod and Poblacion is the town center.

D. Total Land Area

1. General Land Use Classification

The total land area of the municipality is 19,157 hectares based on the cadastral survey report of DENR XII in year 2000. This is smaller by 2,203 hectares from the previous planning period (2000) of 21,360 hectares. In year 2000. Poblacion had only 170 hectares, however the 420.62 hectares. Which was used in the previous planning period for urban land use, plan will be retained comprising Poblacion portion of Gumaga, portion of Cabpangi, portion of Cabaruyan.

LAND USE CATEGORY AREA IN (Has) TOTAL

Agricultural Land 10,649.75 55,5919

Forest Land 6,020.4645 31,42.69

Agro- Forest Land 1,182.68 6,1736

Agro- Industrial 11.81 .06164

Built-up Areas 764 3.9880

Swampland 65 .3393

River Easement 120 .6264

River/ Creeks 200 1.0440

Road/ Streets 118,2955 .6175

River Quarrying 11 574

Birds Sanctuary 4 .0208

Tourism Sites 10 .0522

TOTAL 19,157.02 100.00%

Source: MPDO-Libungan

LAND CLASSIFICATION Area in Has. TOTAL

Residential 60 14.26

Commercial 13 .3.09

Institutional 11 2.61

Industrial 4.45 1.06

Park & Open Space & Other Recreational Facilities 4.09 .97

Road/ Sheets 10.92 2.60

Libungan River 25 5.94

NIA Canals 2 .48

Agricultural Lands 290.16 68.98

TOTAL 420.62 100.00%

Source: MPDO-Libungan

2. Agricultural Land Use Classification



CROP PRODUCTION-Libungan is predominantly an agricultural area. Seventy- five percent (75%) of its total population depends on agriculture or farming as their means/source of livelihood. Based on the records of the Office of the Municipal Agriculturist, the total agricultural area is 10,649.75 hectares and of these total, about 30.35% is planted to corn, 19.70 % is planted to palay. Other crops planted are mango, coconut, rubber and others. Average per hectare per cropping for corn is 3.5 MT while for palay is 4.5 MT for irrigated and 3.5 MT for rainfed areas per cropping respectively. For the support facilities in the agriculture sector, there are about 50 warehouses, 101- grain drying pavements, 59 palay threshers, 93 hand tillers, 36 corn shellers, 12 4 wheel tractors, 21 cono mills, 24 baby cono, and 3 rubbers rollers.

AGRARIAN REFORM- As of 2006 the Municipal Agrarian ReformOffice recorded an area of 2,903.8876 hectares as working scope covered under CARP. 59.52% had been accomplished or a total area of 2,212 hectares has been already distributed to a number of 1,776 actual tillers or beneficiaries. Hopefully, the implementation of CARP in this municipality will help in one way or another in elevating the economic status of the landless beneficiaries for through CARP the poor & landless individuals can own a piece of land to till/ Aside from the Land Tenure Improvement (LTI) being implemented by the MARO, it also implements the Program Beneficiaries Development (PDB). PDB has two components, the Physical Infrastructure project in Ulamian ARC and the training Programs at the Ulamian ARC and Batiocan ARC. Table 21A shows the status of CLOA by the programs at the Ulamian ARC and VLT, GFI and OLT in the CARP covered barangays.

LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY- There are two poultry farms in the Municipality located at barangay Baguer and Nueva fuerza, Cabaruyan. Some backyard poulty, cattle raising and hog raising is also prominent in the rural areas. To ensure the health of the animals raised as well as the working animals like carabao, the Office of the Municipal Agriculturist (OMA) conducts regular vaccination and disease prevention activities. To improve the quality of the animals raised, artificial insemination activities were also conducted by the OMA.

FISHERY- The Municipality has numerous rivers and creeks; however, fresh water fishes that thrive in them could not sufficiently supply the needs of the people. Primart source of fresh water fishes in the municipality is barangay Gumaga, especially its marshy areas. Additional fresh water fish supply comes from the nearby Municipality of Pigcawayan. Salt water fishes are coming from the Municipality of Parang, Maguindanao and General Santos City. There were backyard indland fishpond that had been established in some barangays hopefully, these indland fishponds would help in subsidizing the scarcity of the supply of fresh water in the locality. Fingerlings of the said inland fishpond were supplied by the BFAR (Bureau of Fish & Aquatic Resources) Kabacan, through the office of the Municipal Agriculturist.

FORESTRY- There were six projects managed by the LGU namely, Adopt A Place, I Care, I Care, Ilog Ko Irog KO, Sagip Refo, ARC Refo and SALT through the MENRO, MARO & MAO. Species planted were mango and mahogany. Primary covered barangays are those within the watershed and River Bank of Libungan River. Just recently, planted species have shifted to rubber and Jathropa and other trees of economic value.

Table 3. AGRICULTURAL CROP PRODUCTION IN METRIC TONS



CROPSAREA PLANTED Annual Production 2006

(M.T)(in hectares)

Palay

Irrigated 2,614.25 3-5

Rainfed 574.75 2-5

Corn 3,232.00 3.0-4.0

OPV White 1,261.0 3

Hybrid Yellow 1,971.0 4

Coconut 1,500.00 2.4

Mango (orchard) 332.5 1.5-2.5

Banana (Cardava) 414.5 12-18

Rubber 157.25 3.6-5.4

Others (Vegetables) 91.45 5-12

TOTAL 12,148.7 67

SOURCE: MAO 2009, Libungan

3. Land Area Relative to Province

Based on the DILG-RBI survey conducted last 2005, the total land area of the Municipality of Libungan is 19,157 hectares. The Municipality is composed of twenty (20) barangays namely: Abaga, Baguer, Barongis, Batiocan, Cabaruyan, Cabpangi, Demapaco, Grebona, Gumaga, Kapayawi, Kiloyao, Kitubod, Malengen, Montay, Nicaan, Palao, Poblacion, Sinapangan, Sinawingan and Ulamian.

Table 4: LAND AREA BY BARANGAY AND PERCENT SHARE

BARANGAYNo. of LAND AREA PERCENT SHARE

Household (ha) %

1. Abaga 427 254

2. Baguer 570 1,118

3. Barongis 561 1,264

4. Batiocan 354 398

5. Cabaruyan 844 1,442

6. Cabpangi 507 615

7. Demapaco 274 1,440

8. Grebona 297 470

9. Gumaga 944 889

10. Kapayawi 392 702

11. Kiloyao 173 95212. Kitubod 358 1,38913. Malengen 275 944

14. Montay 542 752

15. Nicaan 433 761

16. Palao 276 1,622

17. Poblacion 1,211 170

18. Sinapangan 367 2,271

19.Sinawingan 474 594

20. Ulamian 392 1,110



TOTAL 9,851 19,157 Source:CBMS RESULT 2007-2010

E. Topography

The municipality is characterized by varied landscape of flat to scattered hills and mountain ranges such as the Kitubod ranges and Mt. Akir-Akir of Demapaco.

SOIL TYPEBasing on the reconnaissance soil survey, there are five types of soil in the municipality of namely:

1. Tamontaka series with clay loam.2. Kabacan series with clay loam.3. Kudarangan series with clay loam4. Unidentified area. This soil type is recommended for production of rice, coconut, fruit trees and

other crops.

Table 5: SOIL , SLOPE INFORMATION

Soil Slope Surface Texture Area

Series Range (Ha.) (%)

1. Tamontaka Series 0.1% Clay loam 1,184 5.71

2. Kabacan Series 0.1% Clay Loam 656 3.17

3. Kudarangan Series 2-5% Clay Loam 7,302 34.21

4. Unclassified Series 8-15% - 2,618 11.60

15-25% - 3,695 17.84

40-60% - 2,955 14.25 Source: Bureau of Soils Regional Office XII

Table 5: SLOPE RANGES, AREA COVERED, LOCATION 2006

Slope Area % to total area Barangay covered

(has)

0-1 % 4,790 22.42

Gumaga, Abaga, Barongis, Poblacion, Sinawingan, Portion of Baguer, Ulamian, Batiocan, Cabpangi,Cabaruyan, Montay, Malengen

2-5% 7,302 34.19

Baguer, Ulamian,Demapaco,Cabaruyan, Montay, Malengen, Sinapangan, Grebona, Nicaan, Portion of Batiocan, Cabpangi, Poblacion, Barongis, Kapayawi and Kiloyao

8-15 % 2,618 12.26Palao and a portion of Nicaan, Kapayawi and Kitubod

15-25% 3,695 17.30A part of Cabpangi, Montay, Sinapangan, Kiloyao and Kitubod

40-60% 2,955 13.83 Forestal areas

Total 21,360 100.00

Source: Bureau of Soils, Region XII

F. Meteorology:

a. Climate



The municipality falls under the fourth (4th) type of climate, which is characterized by more or less even distribution of rainfall throughout the year. Basing on the rainfall records of the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) obtained through LIBRIS, for the year 2000-2007, 2000 has the highest rainfall with the average of 86.82 mm/day while the year 2007 has the lowest rainfall with 39.52 mm/month. The year 1998 was the peak of the El Nina Phenomenon in the Municipality, wherein there was no recorded rainfall in the Month of February, March, April & June while the highest average rainfall occurred in the Month of November.

Average Effective Rainfall By Year in mm/dayYEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC ANNUAL2002 21.30 42.90 18.40 25.80 60.90 0.00 43.60 67.00 47.50 51.40 57.80 13.80 37.502003 165.00 7.10 67.30 39.90 109.50 0.00 119.50 26.60 52.30 75.50 25.20 31.40 59.942004 30.40 18.10 7.20 52.50 55.10 0.00 69.20 16.40 59.50 56.10 28.30 73.10 38.832005 41.6 21.8 28.9 35.2 67.7 77.8 106.4 71.60 57.2 53.3 41.1 58.00 54.882006 21.40 60.30 68.70 54.80 84.80 87.50 38.00 63.70 160.40 99.20 41.30 25.00 62.592007 36.30 18.40 21.20 44.50 35.80 126.30 64.50 48.20 72.50 38.50 54.30 58.30 51.572008 28.10 74.50 58.40 61.50 41.70 108.30 30.20 39.70 53.00 54.80 56.30 35.30 53.482009 55.70 28.10 30.20 72.00 71.60 41.20 125.60 72.90 110.50 58.40 28.60 23.50 59.86

Source: LIBRIS 2009

b. Temperature

Temperature data were also gathered from General Santos City Station considering the proximity of Alabel which is about 23 kilometer distance. The average temperature of the area ranged from 27.10 to 28.64 C (not to mention the average temperature of the highland area which has lower temperature). The temperature range favors the optimum requirements for the growth of most annual and perennial crops commonly grown in the area.

Table 6: Average Monthly Temperature

Month Ave. Temperature oCMaximum Minimum Average Dry Bulb Wet Dew



Bulb Point JanuaryFebruary March April May June JulyAugust September OctoberNovemberDecemberTotal Mean

32.9833.3334.1134.2133.2932.0733.5531.7132.1832.6232.8831.91394.8432.90

22.2222.2422.6223.0823.2922.8822.5722.4922.4622.8422.6922.29271.6722.64

27.6027.7826.3628.6428.2927.4827.0627.1027.3227.7327.7827.10

332.2427.69

27.4327.6228.1228.5128.2827.5627.1927.1827.4127.4627.7227.59332.0727.67

24.2324.3424.5825.1225.3325.0224.7224.7224.8225.0225.0024.68

297.5824.80

23.0523.1523.3123.9724.3424.1423.9623.9424.0224.1324.1023.68

285.7923.82

Source:

c. Relative Humidity

Relative humidity is the ratio of the most amount of water vapor in the air to the maximum amount that the air can hold at that temperature. It is inversely related to the temperature. If the temperature is high, humidity is low, meaning the air is dry and vice versa. High temperature and low relative humidity cause the plant to wilt and low temperature and high humidity cause the formation of fog. This condition favors reproduction of fungus and occurrence of pest and diseases.

d. Cloudiness

Cloudiness refers to the amount of cloud accumulated on the sky that reduces the sunlight penetration into the earth surface. Cloudiness is one of the factors that affect the crop growth and development. Long duration of cloud cover during daytime lessen the exposure of crop to sunlight which is necessary for photosynthetic activities and crop maturity.

e. Wind Speed

The average wind speed in meter per second (mps) is the arithmetic average of the observed wind speed. It is the average wind velocity passing to the locality over a certain time. The average wind speed in this area is 1 and 2 mps which is favorable for crop production. Gentle wind is said to be beneficial for raising crops where the carbon dioxide in the air is immediately replenished. It also favors plant activities for better production. On the other hand, strong wind velocity affects physically and physiologically. It may cause plant damages and spread of pest and diseases.

f. Number of Rainy Days

PAGASA defines rainy days as the period of 24 hours beginning from 8:00 AM up to 8:00 AM of the next day during which 0.1 mm of rain is recorded. Based on 33 years record as shown on Table 4, the



project area has average rainy days of about 10.42 days in a month. The number of rainy day is somewhat correlated with the average monthly rainfall. June, July and October produce an average of 13 rainy days correlating with the maximum rainfall being recorded in those months with rainfall mean of 95.5 mm for June, 100.5 mm for July and 92.0 mm for October.

Table 7: Summary of Climatological Data

Month Relative Humidity (%)

Number of Rainy Days

Cloudiness (OKTAS)

Wind Speed (mps)

Wind Direction

JanuaryFebruary March April May June JulyAugust September OctoberNovemberDecemberTotal Mean

777674767882828282828079950

79.17

9877

1013131311131110125

10.42

554456665555

615.08

222222222112

221.83

NNNSSSSSSSSS

N/SS

g. Water Resources

During the time of the past local administration, water and sanitation (WATSAN) projects were implemented in at least 10 priority barangays. Water facilities were Level 1, 2 & 3. The new administration continued and vigorously implemented the WATSAN program started by the previous administrative thru the distribution of Jetmatic hand pumps and the rehabilitation of spring development projects: covering all barangays of the LGU. Privately owned water facilities is the dominant water system while public owned facilities are dominant water system. However, the RHU listed 207 facilities with doubtful water resources.

Level I POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMBarangay Total Household Level I

Projected Actual Public PrivateNo. HHs Served % No. HHs Served %

Abaga 1,672 278 25 83 90 145 178 64Baguer 3,089 514 57 276 54 210 230 45Barongis 2,807 468 34 154 33 102 122 26Batiocan 1,510 252 39 148 59 73 100 40Cabaruyan 4.175 696 45 292 42 39 110 16Cabpangi 2,232 372 28 125 34 120 134 36Demapaco 1.572 262 6 129 49 32 61 23Grebona 1.478 246 33 134 54 72 96 39Gumaga 3,357 560 56 246 44 117 166 30Kapayawi 1,834 307 27 154 50 18 24 9Kiloyao 979 163 6 22 13 10 13 8Kitubod 1,946 324 3 21 6 6 10 3Malengen 1,421 237 5 75 32 2 7 3Montay 2,815 469 32 212 45 47 68 14Nicaan 1,701 284 21 122 43 54 68 24Palao 1,377 230 1 12 5 1 4 2



Poblacion 5,609 934 120 319 42 78 154 16Sinapangan 1,866 311 32 98 32 12 39 13Sinawingan 2,232 372 39 185 50 164 176 48Ulamian 1,718 286 29 126 44 142 130 45

TOTAL 45,388 7,565 638 3,005 40% 1,444 1,890 25%Source: MHO files, 2006

Barangay Total Household Level 2Projected Actual Public Private

No. HHs Served % No. HHs Served %Abaga 297 283 - - - - - -Baguer 550 511 - - - - - -Barongis 499 373 1 101 22 - - -Batiocan 269 260 - - - - - -Cabaruyan 743 725 1 194 28 - - -Cabpangi 397 388 - - - - - -Demapaco 280 352 1 24 9 - - -Grebona 263 263 - - - - - -Gumaga 598 536 - - - - - -Kapayawi 326 261 1 102 33 - - -Kiloyao 174 148 1 36 22 - -- -Kitubod 346 304 1 242 75 - - -Malengen 253 258 1 114 48 - - -Montay 501 390 1 96 20 - - -Nicaan 303 306 1 62 22 - - -Palao 245 216 1 139 60 - - -Poblacion 998 882 - - - - -Sinapangan 332 266 1 104 33 - - -Sinawingan 397 333 1 1 0.3 - - -Ulamian 306 272 - - -

TOTAL 8,077 7,327 12 1,215 16% - - -MHO (RSI Files 2006

Barangay Total Household Level 3Projected Actual Public Private

No. HHs Served

% No. HHs Served %

Abaga 297 283 1 17 6 - - -Baguer 550 511 - - - - - -Barongis 499 373 BAWASA 31 7 - - -Batiocan 269 260 - - - - - -Cabaruyan 743 725 1 19 3 - - -Cabpangi 397 388 1 48 13 - - -Demapaco 280 352 - - - - - -Grebona 263 263 - - - - - -Gumaga 598 536 Abaga Source 138 2 - - -Kapayawi 326 261 - - - - - -Kiloyao 174 148 - - - - -- -Kitubod 346 304 - - - - - -Malengen 253 258 - - - - - -Montay 501 390 - - - - - -Nicaan 303 306 - - - - - -



Palao 245 216 - - - - - -Poblacion 998 882 1 371 - -Sinapangan 332 266 - - - - -Sinawingan 397 333 - - - - -Ulamian 306 272 - - - - -

TOTAL 8,077 7,327 4 624 - - -

Barangay Total Household DOUBTFUL SOURCESProjected Actual Public Private

No. HHs Served % No. HHs Served %Abaga 297 283 - - - - - -Baguer 550 511 3 14 2.54 2 4 0.72Barongis 499 373 - - - - - -Batiocan 269 260 1 4 1.49 4 5 1.86Cabaruyan 743 725 20 81 10.9

0- - -

Cabpangi 397 388 3 20 5.03 - - -Demapaco 280 352 5 40 14.2

83 6 2.14

Grebona 263 263 3 9 3.42 2 3 1.14Gumaga 598 536 4 20 3.34 - - -Kapayawi 326 261 4 16 4.90 2 4 1.22Kiloyao 174 148 8 30 17.2

42 4 2.29

Kitubod 346 304 4 46 13.29

2 3 0.86

Malengen 253 258 3 17 6.74 3 6 2.38Montay 501 390 10 32 6.38 12 13 2.59Nicaan 303 306 8 5 13 4.29 2 0.66Palao 245 216 8 35 14.2

89 13 5.30

Poblacion 998 882 - - - - - -Sinapangan 332 266 4 18 5.42 6 8 2.40Sinawingan 397 333 5 24 6.04 5 20 5.03Ulamian 306 272 4 18 5.88 30 33 10.78

TOTAL 8,077 98 457 5.65 109 154 1.90

WATERSHED

The DENR thru the CENRO Midsayap have existing watershed/reforestation projects in the Municipality located at Barangay Montay, Sinapangan, Cabpangi and Demapaco in close coordination with the LGU thru its “Adopt a place reforestation project”. In addition, the LGU of Pigcawayan, Alamada, Libungan, Midsayap and Aleosan (PALMA) is the process of preparing a comprehensive and multi-sectoral Libungan-Alamada Watershed Development Plan thru its PALMA Project Management Office (PMO). The DENR thru the CENRO Midsayap on the other hand facilitated the formation of the Libungan- Alamada Natural Biotis Area-Protected Area Management Board (LANBA-PAMB) in compliance to the NIPAS ct and have already completed its initial Protected Area Plan or IPAP and Watershed Characterization. It has also been linking with the PALMA for the Watershed Development Plan formulation.

LAND AREA BY WATERSHED



Name of Land Area PercentageWatershed (Hectares) Share (%)

1 Montay 7522 Sinapangan 2,2713 Cabpangi 6154 Demapaco 1,440 TOTAL 5,078 100.00%

Source: GIS-PPDO, Sarangani Province

I. Municipal Population

1. Total Population

Based on the 2005 DILG Record of Barangay Inhabitants (RBI), Libungan has a total population of 43,410 dominated by the male population. For a period of five (5) years, There was an increase of 2,821. As can be gleaned over, the Libunganons are predominantly composed of a younger population specifically of age grouping 1-19. Young dependency ratio is 81.83 % while old dependency ratio is 7.01 %. Of the total population, Poblacion and Cabaruyan has the highest with 5,374 and 4,042, respectively, while Kiloyao and Demapaco has the lowest with 087 and 1,272, respectively. The scenario with regards to the number of households is interesting to note that Grebona, Palao, and Kiloyao have the least number household which means Demapaco has lesser number of family members per household compared to Grebona and Palao.

However, in terms of population density, Abaga and Poblacion are more populated than the other Barangays with 7 persons per hectare for Abaga and 32 for Poblacion while the average for the Municipality is 2 person per hectare.The urban and rural population increase is more or less even from 2000-2005.

As to Marital Status, most of the Libunganon are legally married followed by those with single civil status, which is primarily under the 10-19 age group. In terms of Mother tongue origins, Libunganon, are dominantly Cebuano-speaking people followed by Hiligaynon/Illonggo’s and Ilocano’s. With regards to religious affiliations, Libunganon’s are dominantly Catholic adherents comprising about 83.71 % of the total household population in 1990, followed by UCCP.

Generally, economic dependency ratio is 2:1, meaning there is one (1) employed person to support two (2) dependents.

In terms of disability, the MSWDO recorded at least 287 cases dominated by male population and the primary case is the physical deformity ( polio), which totaled to 57 persons.

HISTORICAL GROWTH OF POPULATIONYEAR POPULATION INCREASE/DECREASE



2005 43,4102006 45,388 19782007 46,241 8532008 47,111 8702009 49,834 2,723

Source: RHU and NSO Record 2009

POPULATION BY AGE GROUP, SEX, 2008-2009

AGE GROUP MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Children 0-5 y.o 298 286 5846-12 y.o 3,764 3,449 7,213

13-16 y.o 2,211 2,040 4,2516-16 y.o 5,975 5,489 11,464

10 y.o. Above 17,704 16,275 33,979Source: CBMS 2008-2009

POPULATION DENSITY BY BARANGAYBARANGAY Number of

Households(2008-2009)

POPULATION(2008-2009)

LAND AREA(HAS)

POP. DENSITY

1. Abaga 427 1,892 254 72. Baguer 750 3,277 1,118 33. Barongis 561 2,542 1,264 24. Batiocan 354 1,550 398 45. Cabaruyan 844 3,645 1,442 36. Cabpangi 507 2,443 615 47. Demapaco 274 1,217 1,440 .848. Grebona 297 1,345 470 39. Gumaga 944 4,024 889 510. Kapayawi 392 1,721 702 211. Kiloyao 173 832 952 .8712. Kitubod 358 1,783 1,389 113. Malengen 275 1,239 944 114. Montay 542 2,744 752 415. Nicaan 433 2,018 761 316. Palao 276 1,324 1,622 .8117. Poblacion 1,211 5,059 170 3018. Sinapangan 367 1,617 2,271 .7319. Sinawingan 474 2,059 594 .9120. Ulamian 392 1,603 1,110 1

Total 9,851 P 43,970 19,157 2.2 Source: CBMS 2008-2009

URBAN - RURAL POPULATION DISTRIBUTION

CATEGORY 1995 2000 2005

POPULATION % POPULATION % POPULATION %



Urban 4,838 14.95

5,122 12.62

5,374 12.38

Rural 32,364 85.05

35,467 87.38

38,036 87.62

TOTAL 37,202 100

40,589 100 43,410 100

Source: NSO 2000, RBI 2005 Marital Status 10 Years Old and Over, By Sex, 2005

MARITAL STATUS TOTALSingle 26,794Legally Married 15,170Widowed 1,209Separated 171Common-Law/Live-in 116Unknown 210TOTAL 43,410

Source: DILG-Record of Barangay Inhabitants Survey (RBI)-2005

HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION 5 YEARS OLD & OVER BY HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED, 1995

HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED TOTAL MALE FEMALENo Grade Completed 1,661 862 799Pre-School 1,452 737 715Elementary 15,709 8,324 7,385 1st-4th Grade 7,879 4,180 3,699 5th-7th Grade 7,830 4,144 3,686High School 8,597 4,289 4,308 Undergrad 5,085 2,505 2,580 Graduate 3,512 1,784 1,728Post-Secondary 256 127 129 Undergrad 47 24 23 Graduate 209 103 106College Undergrad 1,606 763 843Academic Degree Holder 1,156 453 703Post-Baccalaureate 21 7 14Not Stated 1,211 637 574 TOTAL 31,669 16,199 15,470

Source: NSO

Household Population by Mother Tongue, 1995MOTHER TONGUE TOTAL MALE FEMALE

Cebuano 22,577 11,616 10,961Hiligaynon/Ilonggo 9,328 4,693 4,635Ilocano 2,338 1,195 1,143Manobo 1,606 797 809Maranao 408 205 203Tagalog 322 164 158Maguindanao 228 126 102Ilonggo 107 54 53Boholano 40 18 22Waray 30 18 12Zamboangeño/Chabacano

14 7 7

Not Stated 116 56 60Others 85 47 38 TOTAL 37,119 18,996 18,203



Source: NSO

Household Population by Religious Affiliations, 1995RELIGION POPULATION PERCENT

Roman Catholic 26,832 83.71UCCP 1,662 5.18Southern Baptist 906 2.83Other Protestants 663 2.07Iglesia Ni Kristo 542 1.697th Day Adventist 375 1.17Others 1,075 3.35 TOTAL 32,055 100

Source: NSO

Population By Type of DisabilityDISABILITY MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Ortho 36 25 61Deformity (polio) 57 24 81Speech Impairment 23 17 40Visual Impairment 16 21 37Bone Impairment 4 2 6Mental Impairment 11 12 23Illness 18 7 25Deaf 10 4 14 TOTAL 175 112 287

Source: MSWDO, Libungan, Cotabato 2006

PROJECTED POPULATION BY BARANGAY

BARANGAY 2005 2008 `2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Abaga 1,763 1,928 1,986 2,046 2,108 2,171 2.237 2,305 2,374 2,446 2,520 2,596

Baguer 3,366 3.681 3,792 3,906 4,024 4,145 4.271 4,400 4,533 4,669 4,810 4,956

Barongis 3,066 3.352 3,453 3,557 3,664 3,775 3.889 4,007 4,127 4,252 4,381 4,513

Batiocan 1,658 1.813 1,868 1,924 1,982 2,042 2.104 2,167 2,233 2,300 2,369 2,441

Cabaruyan 4,694 5,132 5,287 5,447 5,611 5,781 5.956 6,135 6,321 6,512 6,708 6,911

Cabpangi 2,440 2,667 2,748 2,831 2,916 3,005 3,095 3,189 3,285 3,384 3,487 3,592

Demapaco 1,728 1,890 1,947 2,005 2,066 2,128 2,192 2,258 2,327 2,397 2,469 2,544

Grebona 1,623 1,775 1,828 1,883 1,940 1,998 2,059 2,121 2,185 2,251 2,319 2,389

Gumaga 3,647 3,987 4,108 4,423 4,360 4,491 4,627 4,767 4,911 5,059 5,212 5,369

Kapayawi 2,009 2,196 2,263 2,331 2,401 2.474 2,549 2,626 2,705 2,787 2,871 2,957

Kiloyao 1,082 1,183 1,219 1,256 1,294 1.333 1,373 1,415 1,457 1,501 1,547 1,594

Kitubod 2,129 2,328 2.398 2,470 2,545 2,621 2,701 2,782 2,866 2,953 3,042 3,134

Malengen 1,563 1,709 1,760 1,814 1,869 1,925 1,983 2,043 2,105 2,169 2,234 2,301

Montay 3,071 3,357 3,459 3,563 3,671 3,781 3,896 4,013 4,135 4,259 4,388 4,521

Nicaan 1,863 2,037 2,009 2,162 2,227 2,295 2,364 2,435 2,509 2,585 2,663 2,743

Palao 1,513 1,654 1,704 1,755 1,808 1,863 1,919 1,977 2,037 2,098 2,161 2,227

Poblacion 6,512 7,120 7,335 7,557 7,785 8,020 8,263 8,512 8,769 9,034 9,307 9,588

Sinapangan 2,044 2,235 2,302 2,372 2,444 2,517 2,593 2,671 2,752 2,836 2,921 3,009



Sinawingan 2,440 2,667 2,748 2,831 2,916 3,005 3,095 3,189 3,285 3,384 3,487 3,592

Ulamian 1,884 2,059 2,122 2,186 2,252 2,330 2,390 2,462 2,537 2,613 2,692 2,773

TOTAL 50,094 54,770 56,425 58,129 59,883 61,690 63,556 65,474 67,453 69,489 71,588 73,750

Source: MPDO computation based on NSO recordsPROJECTED POPULATION BY AGE GROUPING

AGE GROUP 2005 2008 `2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Under 1 1,358 1,484 1,529 1,575 1,623 1,671 1,722 1,774 1,828 1,882 1,940 1,998

1-4 6,091 6,660 6,861 7,068 7,281 7,501 7,728 7,961 8,202 8,449 8,705 8,967

5-9 7,384 8,073 8,317 8,568 8,827 9,093 9,368 9,651 9,942 10,243 10,552 10,871

10-14 6,622 7,241 7,459 7,685 7,917 8,156 8,402 8,656 8,918 9,187 9,464 9,750

15-19 5,485 5,997 6,179 6,365 6,557 6,755 6,959 7,169 7,386 7,609 7,839 8,076

20-24 4,078 4,458 4,593 4,732 4,875 5,022 5,174 5,330 5,491 9,657 9,828 6,004

25-29 3,882 4,245 4,373 4,505 4,641 4,781 4,926 5,074 5,228 5,385 5,548 5,716

30-34 3.376 3,691 3,803 3,918 4,036 4,158 4,284 4,413 4,546 4,684 4,825 7,971

35-39 2,890 3,160 3,256 3,354 3,455 3,559 3,667 3,778 3,892 4,010 4,131 4,255

40-44 2,214 2,421 2,494 2,569 2,646 2,726 2,809 2,894 2,981 3,071 3,164 3,259

45-49 1,708 1,451 1,495 1,982 2,042 1,104 2,167 2,232 2,300 2,369 2,441 2,515

50-54 1,327 1,265 1,303 1,540 1,587 1,634 1,684 1,735 1,787 1,841 1,896 1,154

55-59 1,157 1,008 1,038 1,343 1,384 1,425 1,468 1,513 1,558 1,605 1,654 1,704

60-6422 696 717 1,070 1,102 1,136 1,170 1,205 1,242 1,279 1,317 1,358

65-69 636 696 717 738 760 783 807 831 856 882 909 936

70-74 452 495 510 525 541 557 574 591 609 628 646 665

75-79 277 303 312 321 330 341 351 361 372 384 395 408

80-84 155 169 174 180 185 191 197 203 209 215 222 228

85-over 78 85 88 91 94 97 99 103 106 109 112 115

TOTAL 50,094 54,770 56,425 58,129 59,883 61,690 63,556 65,474 67,453 69,489 71,588 73,750

Table 16. PROJECTED LABOR FORCE PROFILE 15 YRS. OLD & ABOVE (2008-2010)

2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018Total

Population50,09

454,77

056,42

558,12

959,88

461,69

363,55

665,47

667,45

369,49

071,509

73,751

Total Labor Force

28,639

31,312

32,259

33,233

34,237

35,271

36,336

37,433

38,564

39,728

40,928

42,164

Employed LF 16,505

18,045

18,591

19,152

19,730

20,326

20,940

21,572

22,224

22,895

23,587

24,299

Unemployed LF 1,495 1,634 1,684 1,735 1,787 1,841 1,897 1,954 2,013 2,074 2,137

2,201

Not in the LF 10,639

11,632

11,984

12,346

12,719

13,103

13,499

13,906

14,326

14,759

15,205

15,664

Source: MPDO computation based on NSO records

Table 17. DEPENDENCY RATIO 15 YRS. OLD & OVER2008 2009 2010

Total Employed 18045 18591

19152

Total Dependents 36725 37834

38977

Dependency Ratio 2:1 2:1 2:1 Source: MPDC computation based on NS0 records.



J. Economic Activity and Sources of Income

AGRICULTURE

CROP PRODUCTION - Libungan is predominantly an agricultural area. Seventy-five percent (75%) of its total population depends on agriculture or farming as their means/source of livelihood. Based on the records of the Office of the Municipal Agriculturist, the total agricultural area is 15,482.1 hectares and of these total, about 20.88% is planted to corn, 13.5% is planted to palay. Other crops planted are mango, coconut, banana, rubber and others. Average yield per hectare per cropping for corn is 16.87 MT while for palay is 8.8 MT for irrigated and 2.0 MT for rain fed areas, respectively. For the support facilities in the agriculture sector, there are about 50 warehouses, 101-grain drying pavements, 59 palay threshers, 93 hand tillers, 36 corn shellers, 12 4-wheel tractors, 21 cono mills, 24-baby cono, and 3 rubber rollers.

AGRARIAN REFORM – As of 2006 the Municipal Agrarian Reform Office recorded an area of 2,903.8876 hectares as working scope covered under CARP. Fifty-nine percent (59 %) had been accomplished or a total area of 2,212 hectares has been already distributed to a number of 1,776 actual tillers or beneficiaries. Hopefully, the implementation of CARP in this municipality will help in one way or another in elevating the economic status of the landless beneficiaries for through CARP the poor & landless individuals can own a piece of land to till. Aside from the Land Tenure Improvement (LTI) being implemented by the MARO, it also implements the Program Beneficiaries Development (PBD). PBD has two components, the Physical Infrastructure and the Training Programs. As of 2006, the MARO have implemented the Physical Infrastructure projects in Ulamian ARC and the Training Programs at the Ulamian ARC and Batiocan ARC. Table 21A shows the status of CLOA by program type namely; VOS, CA, Settlement, VLT, GFI and OLT in the CARP covered barangays.

LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY – There are two poultry farms in the Municipality located at barangays Baguer and Nueva Fuerza, Cabaruyan. Some backyard poultry, cattle raising and hog raising is also prominent in the rural areas. To ensure the health of the animals raised as well as the working animals like carabao, the Office of the Municipal Agriculturist (OMA) conducts regular vaccination and disease prevention activities. To improve the quality of the animals raised, artificial insemination activities were also conducted by the OMA.

FISHERY - The Municipality has numerous rivers and creeks; however, fresh water fishes that thrive in them could not sufficiently supply the needs of the people. Primary source of fresh water fishes in the municipality is barangay Gumaga, especially its marshy areas. Additional fresh water fish supply comes from the nearby Municipality of Pigcawayan. Salt-water fishes are coming from the Municipality of Parang, Maguindanao and Gen. Santos City. There were backyard inland fishponds that had been established in some barangays hopefully, these inland fishponds would help in subsidizing the scarcity of the supply of fresh water fish in the locality. Fingerlings of the said inland fishpond were supplied by the BFAR (Bureau of Fish & Aquatic Resources) Kabacan, through the office of the Municipal Agriculturist.



FORESTRY - There were six projects managed by the LGU namely, Adopt A Place, I Care, I Care, Ilog Ko Irog KO, Sagip Refo., ARC Refo and SALT through the MENRO, MARO & MAO. Species planted were mango and mahogany. Primary covered barangays are those within the watershed and River Bank of Libungan River. Just recently, planted species have shifted to Rubber and Jathropa and other trees of economic value.

Table 18. Agricultural Crops, Area Planted and Average Yield per Hectare per CroppingCROPS PLANTED AREA PLANTED (Has) AVE. YIELD/HA. (MT)

Palay Irrigated 2,614.25 3.5 Rainfed 574.75 2.5Corn 3,232.00 3.0-4.0 OPV White 1,261.00 6.5 Hybrid Yellow 1,971.00 10.2Coconut 1,500.00 2.4Mango 332.5 1.5-2.5Banana (Cardava) 414.50 12-18Rubber 157.25 3.6-5.4Others (Vegetables) 91.45 5.12 TOTAL 12,148.70 67

Source: OMAG, 2009 Table 19. FARM FACILITIES PROFILE

FARM FACILITIES NUMBER CAPACITYWarehouse 18 500-2,000 sacksGrain Drying Pavement 114 50-100 sacksBaby Cono 24 100-1,000 sacks/dayCorn Mill 17 10 sacks/hr4 Wheels tractor 12 5.0 has./dayHand tillers 93 2.0 has./dayPalay threshers 72 120bags/dayCorn shellers 38 100bags/dayCono Mills 21 150-1,000 sacks/dayRubber Roller 3 50-100 sacks/day

Source: OMAG 2009

Table 20. LIVESTOCK AND POULTRYKIND HEADS

Cattle 7,365Horse 800Carabao 5,615Goat 7,580Swine 15,995Chicken 214,922 TOTAL 252,277

Source: OMAG, 2009

Table 21. Fishery and Aquatic ResourcesLOCATION AREA (sq.m) AVE. YIELD (Kls)

Kitubod River 2,500.00 5,000.00Sitio Matibong 150,000.00 300,000.00Demapaco 7,500.00 15,000.00



Cabaruyan 1,250.00 2,500.00Cabpangi 1,250.00 2,500.00Nicaan 2,500.00 5,000.00Ulamian 2,500.00 5,000.00Sinawingan 7,500.00 15,000.00Montay 5,000.00 10,000.00

TOTAL 180,000.00 360,000.00

Source: OMA 2009

Table 22. CARP PROFILE, 2006Municipality WORKING SCOPE ACCOMPLISHMENTS

as of 07-30-05BALANCE LTIMON PROBLI-

MATICWORKABLE BALANCE (LTIMON)

1

AREA (has)

2

# of FBS

3

AREA (has)

6

# of FBS

7

AREA (has)8=2-6

# of FBS

9

LHs

12

AREA (has) # of FBS

# of Los

# of LHS

LIBUNGAN 4,778.5772

2435 1,695.6877 1202 3,082.8895 1233 174.7046 2,908.1849 1163 215 215

4,778.5772

2435 1,695.6877 1202 3,082.8895 1233 174.7046 2,908.1849 1163 215 215

Source: MARO, Libungan

Table 22-A

REGISTERED EP/CLOA by Program TypeVoluntary Offer to Sell Voluntary Land Transfer

AREA 447.4310 AREA 917.3569# of FBS 378 # of FBS 746# of CLOAs 291 # of CLOAs 591

Compulsory Acquisition Government Financing

AREA 69.0145 AREA 208.2754# of FBS 74 # of FBS 161# of CLOAs 74 # of CLOAs 86

Settlement Operation Land TransferAREA 6.9390 AREA 407.447# of FBS 2 # of FBS 539# of CLOAs 1 # of CLOAs 539

Source: MARO, 2005

Table 22-BPROGRAM/PROJECT

/ACTIVITIES

LOCATION

INCLUSIVE

DATES

FUND SOURC

E

AMOUNT EXPENDE

D

PHYSICAL

TARGET

ACTUAL ACCOMPLIS

H-MENT

REMARKS

Health StationSubproject

Batiocan ARC 2006

DAR-STARC

MLGU

P 1,126,616.

34

1 Unit HS

100% On-going

Duck Raising Subproject

BatiocanARC 2006

DAR-STARC

MLGU

P 525,795.0

0

675 total heads

muscovy ducks,

fishnets, feeds,

biologics

100% Completed

Draft animals with farm implements

UlamianARC 2006

DAR-STARC

MLGU

P568,704.00

20 total heads of carabaos

100% Completed



Goat Raising Subproject

Ulamian2006

DAR-STARC

MLGU

P 569,468.0

0

22 total heads of

goats (does)

100% -Complet

ed

Source: MARO, 2006

Table 23. WATERSHED REHABILITATION PROJECTCONDUCTING

AGENCY/GROUP

PROJECT NAME

YEAR STARTED

PROJECT LOCATION

PROJECT AREA (HAS)

AREA PLANTED

(HAS)

SPECIES PLANTED

FUND SOURCE

REMARKS

MENRO-LGU “Adopt A Place”

2004 Demapaco 30 15 Mango LGU/PALMA

Inadequate Fund

Sinapangan 70 20 Mango LGU/PALMA

MENRO-LGU “I Care, I Care Project”

2003 Sinapangan 100 100 Mahogany LGU/DENR Watershed Landmarks

MENRO-LGU “ILOG KO, IROG KO”

2004 Brgys. Nicaan,

10,000sq.m 10,000sq.m Mahogany LGU-PALMA Riverbanks Rehab.

Kapayawi,GrebonaMontay,CabaruyanPoblacion, GumagaAbaga, BarongisAnd Kiloyao

Source: MENRO, Libungan, Cotabato, 2006

Table 24. REFORESTATION PROJECTS, LibunganCONDUCTI

NGAGENCY/ GROUP

PROJECT NAME

YEAR START

ED

PROJECT LOCATION

PROJECT

AREA(Has)

AREAPLANTED(HAS)

SPECIES PLANTE

D

FUNDING SOURCE

REMARKS

MENRO SAGIPReforestation

2004 Sinapangan - 50 Mahogany

LGU/PALMA/DENR/NGO/POACADEME/BRGY

DAR Ulamian - 30 Mahogany

LGU/PALMA/DENR/BRGY

Source: MENRO, Libungan, 2006SAGIP-Strategic Approach of Groups with Inter-functional Perspective

Table 25. SALT AREAS, Libungan

BARANGAY # of HH Beneficiaries AREA (Has)1. Montay 8 10.02. Kitubod - -3. Cabaruyan 5 8.04. Palao 20 10.05. Malengen 10 2.06Cabpangi 8 2.07. Kapayawi - -8. Ulamian 20 20.09. Barongis 20 8.010. Demapaco 23 15.011. Sinapangan 12 10.012. Kiloyao 6 2.0* Sitio Kibudacan



Total 132 87.0 Source: OMA, Libungan, 2006

2.1.2 COMMERCE

Based on the records of the Office of the Mayor as of 2006, there are about 171 business permits issued. Most of these are engaged in the retail trade and personal/social/community services/business. Aside from retail trading, there are 12 entities engaged in buy and sell, and most of the business establishments are concentrated in the Public Market Area. However, there are also business establishments in the rural barangays catering to the needs of its people. Considering the number of commercial establishments in 2006, there was a decline of 44.

The Public market revenue generation/collection have been performing dismally due to various factors hence vigorous come-in strategies and activities were undertaken to promote the Libungan Public Market, like the Oplan Angat Palengke. Aside from the Municipal Public Market, there are also barangay markets at barangay Montay, Nicaan and Baguer. Barangay Montay and Nicaan have a one day scheduled market day unlike the one at Baguer, which is open all day of the week, especially in the late afternoon.

Table 26. Type and Number of Commercial Establishments, 2006

TYPE NO.Retail -Peedling -Gasoline -Agri/Vet Supply -Dry Goods -Sari-Sari -Dried Fish Vending -Fish Vending -Meat Vending -Rice & Corn -Drugstore -School Supply -Gen. Merchandise

644212

16176

13435

Transportation/Communication/Storage - Trucking - Warehousing - Telephone

65-1

Part/Hardware/Const./CHB/Sand & Gravel - Hardware - Construction - CHB/Sand & Gravel - Lumberyard

123423

Manufacturing/Fabrication - Banana Chips - Iron Works

211



Milling/Shelling - Rice Mill - Corn Mill

321

Financial Institution- Banks- Pawnshop- Coco Grate/Coffee Mill

- Corn Shelling

71312

Specialty Store - Native Products - Cooperative

422

Agri/Fishery/Forestry - Nursery - Poultry

312

Personal/Social/Community Services - Video/Beta Tapes for rent - Bakery - Repair Shop - Videoke/Refreshment/Carenderias - Billiard hall - Resort - Beauty Parlor - Space for Rent - Cemetery - Vulcanizing - Tailoring - Boutique

58392

2631431141

Wholesale/ Buy and Sell 12 Total 171

2.1.3 INDUSTRY

Industrial activities in the municipality are primarily agriculture-based. Dominant among these are the rice and corn mills. There is also one (1) Rock/Stone Crusher located at barangay Grebona, (1) Poultry farm at Barangay Baguer and one is Barangay Cabaruyan. There is also a banana chips factory located at the Poblacion. Raw materials of these industries are sourced from the barangays they are located except the banana chips factory where raw materials are bought from the adjacent barangays. In addition, bakeries are also thriving in the municipality.

2.1.4 TOURISM

Tourism activities/projects for the last five years have not been vigorously pursued/implemented due to various reasons. Local tourist destinations that need to be developed are the Sapangbato River at Barangay Grebona, the waterfall at Barangay Sinapangan and the Boy & Girl Scout Camp at Barangay Demapaco. Sapangbato is ideal for swimming and picnicking; the waterfall is suited for mountaineering, swimming and picnic while the BGS Camp is ideal for camping and other outdoor activities.

The waterfall at Sinapangan is now considered to be the only existing waterfall in the municipality and its development will surely encourage progress in the area, while the BGS Camp at Demapaco has been set aside for the purpose long time ago, but its development is yet to be seen. Aside from the natural tourism sites that need to be tapped, there are also various cultural festivities held by the Manobo tribe at Barangays Barongis,



Demapaco, Grebona and Sinapangan. Patronal fiestas are also observed in the municipality. Presently, there is one swimming resort at Barangay Ulamian owned and operated by the private sector. Underground water was tapped for the swimming pool. Other part of the area was built with shades/cottages. Their captive markets are the adjacent municipalities and even Cotabato City.

III. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

A. Statement of the Problem and Opportunities

Road inaccessibility is one of the problems of Sitio Katitisan and Barangay Cabpangi.Existing road sections are already dilapidated which is very difficult to traverse especially during rainy days. Delivery of socio - economic services is also hampered for the same reason. High cost of transporting farm inputs and outputs undermined agricultural productivity. It is expected that the implementation of the project will encourage the farmers to invest more capital to enhance their productivity. The road influence area has still vast tract of idle land which can be converted as an additional productive agricultural land when this project is realized.

B. Project Objectives:

a. To increase agricultural productivity;b. To create or induce employment;c. To open-up agro-industrial complementary activities;d. To promote social development; e. Improved access to market; f. Improved access to social services; g. Reduce transport cost of farm inputs & products.

C. Brief Presentation of Socio-Economic Indicators of Influence Area

1. Population

Based on the 2005 DILG Record of Barangay Inhabitants (RBI), Libungan has a total population of 43,410 dominated by the male population. For a period of 5 years, there was an increase of 2,821. As can be gleaned over, the Libunganons are predominantly composed of a younger population specifically of age grouping 1-19. Young dependency ratio is 81.83% while old dependency ratio is 7.01%. Of the total population, Poblacion and Cabaruyan has the highest with 5,374 & 4,042, respectively, while Kiloyao & Demapaco has the lowest with 807 and 1,272, respectively. The scenario with regards to the number of households is interesting to note that Grebona, Palao, and Kiloyao have the least number of household which means Demapaco has lesser number of family members per household compared to Grebona and Palao.

2. Education

There are two (2) elementary school districts in the Municipality, the East and West Districts. In the West District, there are already 12 elementary schools and in the East District there are 11 schools - 1 primary and



10 elementary. The combined enrollment for SY 2005-2006 totaled 7,312, which is slightly dominated by the female population. Of the five (5) high schools, there are 3 public and 2 private schools with a combined enrollment for SY 2005-2006 of 2,980, which is interestingly dominated by the female population.

As of SY 2006-2007, there are 4,436 enrollees in the West District, slightly dominated by boy’s enrollees. Of the number of dropouts of fifty seven percent (57 %) came from the ranks of boys. In the other District, there are 2,850 enrollees, dominated again by male pupils. District record also showed that there are 142-drop outs dominated also by boy pupils. Comparatively, the West District has higher enrollment than the East District due to the fact that the West District, comprising the lower portion of the municipality is more populated. With regards to teacher strength, the West District vested the East District with its 128 teachers. The West District also has more school buildings and number of classrooms. Student-Teacher ratio in the West District is 35:1 while it is 38:1 in the East District. Municipal-wide, the elementary school student-teacher ratio is 36:1 the classroom-student ratio in the West District is 37:1 and 38:1 in the East District. Municipal-wide, elementary student-classroom ratio is 1:37. In the public high school, classroom-student ratio is 1:45 and the male students dominate the number of dropouts. Student-Teacher ratio is 36:1. Like any other schools, the female teachers dominated the school campuses. Though there are enough school buildings in the schools, it is sad to note that majority of the public elementary and high schools have no library. There are also two (2) private elementary schools in the Poblacion Area. The main reason pointed out in the dominance of the male population in the dropout case is poverty. The parents would require them to help out in the farm work and similar undertaking for “ Food in the Table”. Although the dropout rate in the East District is slightly higher than in the West District, the municipal wide rate was only 3%. Further, pupils from Sitio Katitisan are attending classes at Batiocan Elementary school and high school pupils are attending classes at Libungan National High School at Poblacion .

3. Health and Sanitation

Health and sanitation services in this area is fairly delivered and it can be improved if the road going to the sitio is upgraded. While, most of the residents use community water system and shallow well pumps as source of potable water, some are still using dug wells as the primary source of drinking water which is considered not safe for drinking.

4. Livelihood

Farming is the primary source of livelihood in the project area. Major crops are rice, corn, banana, coconut, mango, rice, and other root crops. Approximately, 867.62 hectares of land suitable for agriculture within the influence area .

5. Relation of the Project to the Development Plan of the Project Influence Area

The priority project clamored by constituents of the area is rural access and transportation facilities. These also emerged as priority projects in the development framework of the municipality’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and in the Barangay Development Plan, CY 2007-2009, which includes maintenance, opening and rehabilitation of farm-to-market roads.

The Local Government of Libungan through the Municipal Planning and Development Office, Municipal Engineer’s Office and the Municipal Agriculture Office in coordination with the Barangay Local Government of Cabpangi jointly identified the Project: Upgrading of Cabpangi-katitisan road, a farm to market road project in partnership with the Mindanao Rural Development Program – Adaptable Program Loan 2 (MRDP-APL2) and the Provincial Government of Cotabato.

It is envisioned that the proposed project could establish developmental interventions to uplift the lives of the people within the area of influence of the sub-project . The sub-project will be packaged



to achieve balance between the physical economics and social services. With the LGU’s thrust of excellence and progress, the sub-project will be an essential tool to facilitate mobility and continuous flow of goods and services. All of these combined are believed to contribute towards meeting the basic needs of the increasing population and the dynamic market.


ROAD INFLUENCE AREA

LAND USE Cabpangi Gumaga Total

1. CROP AREA (Hectares) A. Rice 20.00 30.00 50.00

B. Corn 25.00 35.00 60.00

C. Banana 5.00 15.00 20.00

D. Coconut 10.00 30.00 40.00

TOTAL 60.00 110.00 170.00

Source: OMAG2009, Libungan


IV. - PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS

A. Demand-Supply Situation

1. Existing Roads, Bridges and Transport System in the Area

Table 19. Existing Roads and Transport System in the Subproject Area.

Road Type

Road Classification (in kilometers)TOTAL

Gravel Earth Concrete

Passable Not Passable

PassableNot

PassablePassable

Not Passable

PassableNot

Passable

Brgy FMR 1.994 0 2 0 .006 0 4 0

Source: Office of the Municipal Engineer,

Although the existing 4-kilometer farm-to market road is passable but the deteriorated road condition makes it difficult to pass during rainy days.

a. Analysis of Road and Transport System

Present Road Network Condition in the Project Area vis-à-vis Accessibility of Road to Market Centers/Trading Points

The newly completed mega market at Barangay Poblacion where the central business district is located is approximately 4 kilometers from the influence area. Once road upgrading are in placed it will reduce the travel time as well as the transportation cost.

Availability of Public Transport Vehicles in the Project Area (origin to destination)

So far, the only available public transport in the project area are habal-habal PUJ and hauling trucks plying from Poblacion to Barangay Cabpangi and Sitio Katitisan. Fare and hauling cost vary depending on the condition of the road ranging from P25 to P30 per person and P25to P30 per sack of rice, corn and copra.

Seasonal Impassability of Road Site

The road site is basically passable only by habal-habal and hauler trucks during dry seasons but during rainy days, the road become impassable because of high gradient of some road sections.

Alternate Diversion Routes Used within the Sub-Project Area and their Conditions

This is the best route being utilized within the project area leading to the market site. Alternate route has problems in distance and passing through mountain sides which is



hazardous for individuals especially during rainy days where landslide may occur. Once this project is materialized, transporting of goods will be improved by 80%.

Existing Modes of Transport and Hauling Passenger and Cargo

People in the sub-project area usually travel by habal-habal motorcycles, by foot or to some extent on horsebacks riding. Products or cargoes are either hauled through by horse or hauler trucks.

.

b. Analysis on how the Proposed road Facility will Close in the gap in the Infrastructure Development within the Area in Terms of generated, Induced and Diverted Traffic.

Poor condition of the existing road has been a problem in the sub-project influence area. When bad weather occurs, access to transportation worsens the situation because the road is no longer passable even by motorcycle. Upgrading the road would certainly address this priority concern of the constituents. It will reduce travel time from their area to nearby markets up to an hour from their usual time and therefore increase mobility of stakeholders. Other transportation vehicles would become available and accessible and this will definitely increase traffic counts. More families then would be enticed to pursue agricultural undertaking and more economic activities would be brought up. With this condition, more opportunities and investments will hopefully pour in. Parents could also afford to send their children to high school since there is no secondary school at the area.



B. Technical Analysis

1. Existing Roads Alignment

The road upgrading will start at sta. 0+000 up to sta. 1+000. then. It will be made of PCCP, 4 m width, 0.15m thick ,6 m carriageway with 1.0 kilometer length which will cross the Davao-Cotabato Highway at Sta 0+600.

2. Description and Location/Site of Existing Structures and Their Current Physical Conditions There are no existing structures in the area.

3. Design Analysis of Proposed Works.

a. Description of Proposed Road Upgrading

b. The road upgrading will be made of Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP) with a length of 1.0 kilometers, 4m width and 0.15m thick. Road side canal sections were designed sufficient enough to accumulate run-off water during heavy rain.

c. Design Analysis of the Structures

The design for the upgrading of Cabpangi-Katitisan road is in accordance with the standard specifications of roads and bridges of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). Works to be done are as follows:

103(6) - Structure Excavation104(1) - Embankment 105 - Subgrade Preparation200 - Aggregate Sub-Base Course201 - Aggregate Base Course311(1) - PCCP, Plain500(1) - RCCP (0.90 M ø)506 - Stone Masonry

4. Proposed Location of Quarries, Borrow Pits and Construction Materials

a. Relative Distance Quarry and Construction Materials to Project Site

Filling materials will be sourced out from a quarry site Sitio Waterfalls at Barangay Cabpangi which is 4 kilometers away from the project site, while construction materials will be procured from the Poblacion about 15-minutes travel to project site.

Handling Materials

Materials will be transported to the project site via national highway, municipal road and by an all-weather barangay road.

b. Dependability and Availability of Required Quantities



The required quantity and quality of necessary materials can be supplied by known sources.C. Operational Aspects

1. Organization to Implement the Project

In order to ascertain proper implementation, effective management and close supervision of various activities in the sub-project area, Executive Orders have been created stipulating the following structures and functions of the sub-project management:

a. MUNICIPAL MAYOR (The Chief Implementing Officer)

Approves/enters into contract for sub project implementation. Approves payment of progress billing, materials, labor services, tools and equipment rental

duly recommended by the Project Planning Officer. Ensures compliance to the provision stipulated in the Sub-Project Agreement. Over-all project implementor and supervisor of the project.

b. Sangguniang Bayan (Municipal Council)

Legislate ordinance/resolutions needed to support MRDP sub-projects FS and Detailed Engineering design preparation and other requisites in the realization of the project.

Appropriate LGU equity and other administrative and logistic support requirements.

c. The Municipal Engineer (Project Engineer)

Oversee the implementation of the project and monitor the various activity involved and its accomplishment at the sub-project level.

Consult the problem arising from the implementation of the sub-project. Coordinate to the MRDP project office the development and status of the Project. Conduct constant project site visitation/inspection at the sub-project to monitor the

construction activities. Submits Periodic report to the Regional Project Officer.

To support the management unit, other support units shall be created, to wit:

d. The construction and Operation Unit

This unit shall ensure that the sub-project is completed according to approved engineering design and program of work. This is headed by the project engineer and office of the municipal engineer staff.

The Project Engineer shall have the following functions:

Undertake and/or supervise sub-project implementation. Be directly responsible for the timely completion of the sub-projects. Conduct project site visitation to monitor field activities and personnel. Prepares the necessary documents for the acquisition of tools and materials. Prepares and submits daily report logbooks monthly, quarterly and annual consolidated

physical progress report of the Farm to Market Road project. Acts as the signatory of the payroll and other construction related reports.



Conduct regular meeting as scheduled with the supervisor to thresh-out problems during project implementation.

Ensures monitoring for the quality and project standards are observe and meet the whole project implementation process.

Over-all in charge of technical and engineering aspect of sub-project implementation. Formulates daily, weekly and monthly plans targets. In charge also of the maintenance and operation of the sub-project after its completion in

coordination with the barangay local government unit.

e. The Monitoring and Evaluation Unit

This unit shall ensure the compliance of the prescribe procedures and guidelines for monitoring and reporting. This shall be spearheaded by the Municipal Planning and Development Coordinator and his/her staff with the following roles and responsibility.

Heads the over-all planning, evaluation, assessment and monitoring of the sub-project. Consolidates the physical progress report submitted by the field engineer/supervisor. Analyzes and submits a consolidated monthly, quarterly and annual report to the project

officer. Formulates and recommend measures as may be necessary for the efficient and effective

implementation with outmost concern on cost efficiency and austerity. Provide the sub-project management office with technical inputs on the over-all project

management and supervision. Do other related task as may be necessary for the attainment of project goals and objectives.

f. The Project Finance In-Charge (The Municipal Treasurer)

Ensures that the required equity for the sub-project is deposited before the grants funds are release by the MRDP-2.

Take charge of the disbursement of the sub-project funds. Acts fund custodian and efficiently manages the sub-project funds. Keep track of all financial transaction of the LGU relative to the MRDP sub-project. Maintain bank accounts, cash book and other financial report of the sub-project and monitor

fund balances. See to it that disbursements are in accordance with the approval sub-project work and

financial plan. Ensures the timely flow of funds for the sub-project.

g. The Project Accounts In-Charge (The Municipal Accountant)

Ensures that the disbursement for the sub-project is in accordance with the World Bank guidelines and the government auditing rules and regulations

Review the supporting documents before the preparation of checks to ascertain its veracity, authenticity and completeness.

Certifies the availability of funds as to which expenditures may be properly charged Ensures that expenditures are in accordance with the sub-project and the approved work and

financial plan Prepare journals, maintain and keeps all records, reports of the sub-project for submission to

management and other institution Certifies the correctness of the certificate of status of funds report and the statement of

receipts and disbursement submitted monthly to Project Office



Apprise the MRDP sub-project Management Organization, the members of the Monitoring Board and the LCE on the financial condition and operation of the sub-project

Ensures the submission of all financial report to the project office Ensures compliance to the audit requirements and timely submission of the annual Maintains records and control of the disbursement for the MRDP sub-project per type of

infrastructure and per funding source

h. The Technical Support Staff Members

In-Charge of writing and packaging the Feasibility Study Take charge of the gathering of primary and secondary data needed in technical writing of

the sub-project being proposed Undertake engineering technical services for the project Assist the Project Engineer in the performance of his duty Undertakes admin and support services for the project including but not limited to personnel,

records, supply management and other auxiliary services Serve as project data processor and packaging reports for submission to the MRDP Project

Office Provide admin services all throughout the duration of the sub-project

i. The Bids and Awards Committee

It shall undertake the procurement activities of the project in accordance with the World Bank policies and guidelines and ensures transparency and good governance in the conduct of its functions

j. The Sub-Project Monitoring Board

Ensures transparency and accountability of all matters relative to the project implementation of the sub-project level with the participation of the non-government organization or civil society

Monitors project implementation activities and updates based on the approved plans and designs

Monitors the implementation of the operation and maintenance of the completed infrastructure facilities

D. Social Assessment

1. Local Community Participation During Planning and Preparatory Activities

This project was conceptualized out of the pressing demand of the local communities within the area during the conduct of various consultations with the affected constituents. Consultative meetings were also conducted, opinions and recommendations were considered, surveys made and commitments solicited among local leaders as well as the community.

2. Right of Way Allocation for Existing Roadway and Canal Routes and their brief History

The proposed project in the sub-project area will be implemented along the cadastral road. No private lands shall be encroached; hence securing right of way is no longer necessary.

3. Project Affected Persons (PAP) and their characteristics



No persons or residents shall be directly affected.

4. Defining the Geographical Limits of Lands or Properties

Cabpangi-Katitisan road traverses cadastral road. No private lands will be affected in the course of project implementation nor agricultural cultivated fields shall be affected.

5. Existing Land Use of Proposed Site

The existing agricultural land use of the sub-project area is more or less 867.62 hectares. The major crops in the influence area are rice, coconut, corn, mango and banana.

6. Status of Right of Way Acquisition for Lands to be Used by Road Project (DoD, quit claims, Permit to Enter/Construct/Operate, compensation if any)

Right of Way acquisition is no longer necessary on account of the fact that the existing Cabpangi-Katitisan Farm-to-Market road is along the cadastral road.

7. Social Impact to Project Beneficiaries and Others

The proposed project shall directly benefit constituents of Barangay Cabpangi and Sitio Katitisan. In particular, there will be 1,451 households (6,467 people) who shall benefit from this facility. First, this facility shall reduce the travel time of transporting their farm products to nearby market center of Poblacion. Second, by reducing the traveling time, it could also reduce the cost of doing business such as expenses to be incurred for fuel and fare. Moreover, the people would become more productive for they are able to perform several other transactions and economic activities. Third, the presence of accessible road that links the nearest central market area in Poblacion, more investors, traders, entrepreneurs will be encouraged to engage in commerce and trading with the people in the sub-project area.

With the presence of economic enterprise undertakings in the area, it would imply employment generation and livelihood opportunities for the people. With an improved economic life, there will be less crimes, reduced poverty, improved health, increased literacy and elevated human dignity on the community. Therefore, in general, this project could spur socio-economic development in the sub-project area and the adjacent barangays. Eventually, it could also of great benefits to the entire Municipality of Libungan.

9. Presence of Indigenous Persons/Communities

No inhabitants in the influence area of indigenous tribe.

10. Establishment of IP’s/IC’s are within Ancestral Domain

The sub-project area is not within the ancestral domain.

11. Status of NCIP Application

NCIP Application is not applicable.

E. Environmental Considerations: (Environmental Management Plan for the Proposed Sub-Project)

1. Impacts



The following are the most possible adverse effects of the sub-project in the whole duration of the construction and operation phase.

Noise – the impact of noise is mainly due to heavy equipment in operation. However, only a few residents will experience this noise since the sub-project is relatively far from the project site.

Siltation – earthwork will generate volume of disturbed soil and rocks that could be eroded during the rains.

Water inferior quality – the organic pollutants derived from the use of fuel, oil and grease from heavy equipment to be used in the operation may percolate and find their way to streams and rivers.

Dust – while in operation and maintenance, dust will certainly be produced.

Risk of Life – accidents could happen at anytime, as workers will be exposed to, namely: slipping, tripping, falling and unlikely contact with heavy equipment which may lead to death. Health condition may be aggravated by the actual operational activities.

Interference with the movement of livestock and local residences

Flooding

Stream and Lake sedimentation

Trash and garbage

Presence of non-residents labor force

2. Mitigating/Enhancement Measures

To avoid any company damage to the environment, here are some mitigating measures that can be undertaken using the basic design considerations:

Provide noise barriers Do earth-moving activities during day time Conduct proper silting, avoid sensitive environments Install sediment basin Recycle lubricants Set-up dust control by application of water Rerouting of vehicular traffic and putting up of proper signage

3. Cost of Mitigation

The cost of mitigation is actually integrated in the program of work.

4. Responsible Units

All stakeholders of the projects have their respective responsibility in making sure that the mitigating measures are installed and implemented.



5. Analysis of More Critical Environment Impacts and How These were Addressed in the Technical Design.

All of the critical implications brought about by these sub-projects are carefully considered in the technical design.

1.0 Pre-construction Phase (Site Selection, Planning/Design, Procurement, Hiring)1.1 Site

Selection and Planning/ Design

Encroachment in Protected Areas/ natural/critical habitats (e.g. mangrove/forest ecosystems, coral reefs, & other aquatic ecosystems)

Inconsistent with protected area zoning

Consider alternative site or design to be compatible with the PA zoning

Secure PAMB Resolution for PA

LGU________________________

PO/NGO________________________

Integrated in Pre-construction Cost: P50/person * # pax * # meetingsPhP_________

Damage to flora and disturbance to fauna in forest areas/other critical habitats

Consider alternative site or design to reduce effects on flora and fauna

Secure Special Land Use Permit, Tree Cutting Permit and/or Right-of-Way Permit from DENR-FMB and permits from PAWB for affected wildlife

LGU________________________

PO/NGO________________________

Integrated in Pre-construction Cost: Permit fees for SLUP, TCP, ROW PhP________________

Land acquisition, ROW conflict, resettlement, structure and crops damage, business loss

Consider alternative site with less or no involuntary resettlement issues

Secure Deed of Donation or Quit Claim on land

Prepare compensation package, e.g. Land Acquisition, Resettlement & Rehabilitation Plan (LARRP) or Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) thru prior consultation with Project Affected Persons (PAPs)

Identify resettlement site (if selected as option) and subject the RAP to consultation with host community

Implement the LARR/RAP, including payments of compensation, at least a month prior to start of Construction Works

LGU________________________

PO/NGO_______________________

Integrated in Pre-construction Cost:Compensation Package (Refer to LARR): PhP_________

Purchase of Resettlement site (integrate in Project Cost & make available before Construction Phase)

Encroachment in areas with IPs/lands with Ancestral Domain Claim

Reroute FMR if possible to lessen impacts, unless the IPs are among the beneficiaries of the FMR

Apply for FBI and secure FPIC from the IPs thru the NCIP

LGU________________________

PO/NGO______________________

Integrated in Pre-construction Cost:P5,000/Survey; P50/person * # pax * # meetingsPhP________

Damage or cause disturbance to adjacent or nearby sites of Cultural Heritage

Change the FMR location or design to avoid or lessen probability of damage

Secure NHI clearance & coordinate on design/ construction works

LGU________________________ PO/NGO________________________

Integrated in Pre-construction Cost:Clearance Fees PhP________

Unstable or disturbed slopes/ banks may cause damage to FMR

Include in the design appropriate erosion control, slope stabilization and protection measures

LGU___________ PO/NGO____________

Included in the Design & Construction Cost : PhP_________

Negative reactions from the public due to lack of information and coordination

Hold consultative meetings with project beneficiaries and affected persons on the project components and mgt plan

LGU________________________

Integrated in Pre-construction Cost: P50/person * # pax * #



PO/NGO________________________

meetingsPhP________

1.2Procurement

Possible illegal or unauthorized sourcing of raw/construction materials

Procure construction materials from licensed sources, i.e. for sand and gravel, from those with valid MGB/EMB permits; for timber resources, from those with valid FMB/EMB permits

LGU________________________ PO/NGO________________________

Cost of Purchases from licensed sources -- Integrated in Pre- & Construction Costs: PhP___________

1.3 Hiring of labor and other manpower services

Increased employment opportunity and community income

Entry of external workforce

Give hiring preference to qualified local community residents, particularly those who will be displaced

LGU________________________

PO/NGO________________________

Local Hiring cost integrated in Pre- & Construction Costs: PhP_______

2.0 Construction Phase 2.1 Mobilization/Temfacil /Bridge Construction/Demob

Soil erosion and landslides due to clearing/ excavation operations

Provide slope protection through bank compaction, rip-rapping on critical sections, or vegetative stabilization Designate a Spoils Storage Area, with topsoil set aside for later use and allow maximum re-use of spoils

Presence of eroded areas near the site

Occurrence of landslide

Contractor: _________________________

Slope/Erosion Control Measures integrated in Construction Cost: PhP________

Removal of vegetation and disturbance to wildlife

Secure prior DENR Tree Cutting Permit (TCP)

Do replacement planting with double purpose of serving as vegetation buffers for disturbed wildlife

In forest roads, put up wildlife conservation signs, and set guidelines with corresponding IEC for workers to prohibit wildlife collection, hunting, poaching, with meaningful consequences for violation such as employment termination

Presence of FMB TCP

Area replanted

Presence of signages

# of violations to set guidelines

Contractor: __________________________

Integrate in Construction Cost: -Replacement planting cost depends on area opened up;PhP________ - P5,000 for signages/posters-IEC meetings at P50/pax:PhP________

Dust suspension from spoils stockpiles, vehicle movement in unpaved roads & construction works

Compact spoils storage areas Wet areas of dust sources to minimize

discomfort to nearby residents Control of vehicle speed to lessen

suspension of road dust

# public complaints received by Proponent/ Contractor

Contractor: __________________________

Water spraying cost integrated in Construction Cost: PhP_______

Obnoxious gas & particulate emissions from vehicles, heavy equipment & genset

Regular equipment M&R Contractor to present proof of compliance

with emission standards as part of the annual vehicle registration process

Presence of black smoke from construction sources

Contractor: __________________________

Equipment M&R integrated in Construction Cost : PhP________

Noise generation from heavy equipment & genset operations

Schedule equipment movement during non-peak hours of daytime vehicular traffic

Minimize night-time construction activities Provide housing for gensets, if near

residences Provide silencers/mufflers for heavy

equipment


Contractor: __________________________

Genset housing integrated in Construction Cost: PhP_______

Increased river turbidity & siltation, causing inconvenience in community use of the affected river water

Set up sediment traps along rivers and/or gabions along banks to filter out eroded sediments

Same measures above for erosion control and slope stabilization


Contractor: __________________________

Silt trap/stilling ponds integrated in Construction Cost: PhP_______

Oil & grease contamination of water bodies due to poor equipment M&R & refuelling

Provide oil & grease traps in stilling ponds Provide ring canals around fuelling tanks/

motorpool/ maintenance areas Collect used oils in containers

Presence of oil film on water surface;

# public complaints received by Proponent/

Contractor: __________________________

O&G traps & ring canals integrated in Construction Cost: PhP________



Contractor Decreased public

access through the construction area

Designate an alternate route for pedestrian and vehicles in coordination with the LGU or provide safe passageway thru the construction site


Contractor: __________________________

Alternative access & its M&R integrated in Construction Cost: PhP_______

Increased traffic due to frequent heavy equipment/ vehicle movement

Schedule vehicle movement during lean daytime traffic hours or at night.

Provide traffic aides/flagmen (e.g. thru barangay) , traffic signs to help ensure the free and safe flow of traffic

Maintain & Repair temporary alternative route of vehicles & pedestrians

Presence of traffic signs

# of public complaints received by Proponent/ Contractor

Occurrence of traffic build-up

Contractor: __________________________

Integrated in Construction Cost: - P5,000 for signage, safety nets and lighting);- LGU Traffic Aides : PhP_______- Allocate equipment for repair

Increased community hazards of vehicular accidents and construction works

Provide appropriate warning signs, lighting and barricades, whenever practicable

Observe traffic rules, e.g. vehicle speed. Observe proper housekeeping during

construction and demobilization to clear site of construction debris

Provide on-site medical services and supplies for any emergency, thru institutional and administrative arrangements with the barangay health unit.


# of accidents Presence of

scattered construction debris

Contractor: __________________________

Signages & LGU traffic aides cost earlier integrated in Construction Cost;

Housekeeping/Clean-up integrated in Construction Cost: PhP_______

Occupational health hazards to workers

Require all workers to strictly observe safety standards

Put up safety signs along the road construction route

Provide potable water & sanitary facilities for construction workers


Quality of water source

Presence of adequate sanitaty facilities

# of medical complaints or cases

Contractor: __________________________

Potable water supply & sanitary facilities integrated in Construction Cost: PhP_______

Increased micro-economic activity within the area

Coordinate with the LGU on management of traffic & handling of solid waste

Comply with city/town ordinances

# businesses Presence of

clean commercial area

Low traffic

Contractor: __________________________

Coordination at minimal cost (Integrated in construction cost ):PhP________

Damage to cultural property which may be traversed or encountered during construction

If not possible to reroute, observe reporting and conservation protocols based on prior coordination with the NHI/NM

Presence of clearance

# of public complaints received by Proponent & Contractor

Contractor: __________________________

Minimal cost (letter or meeting):PhP________

Impact to IPs, women & other vulnerable groups who may be affected by the road construction, including those who may be inconvenienced in their use of the river downstream for domestic works.

Addressed by measures to prevent water quality impacts

Prior consultation & coordination to minimize disruption on daily domestic activities & avoid violation of human rights

# of public complaints received by Proponent & Contractor

Contractor: __________________________

Coordination integrated in Construction Cost :P50/person * # pax * # meetings: PhP________

Over-flooding of the roadway due to excessive accumulation of rainwater and un-diverted waterways

Provision of adequate drainage system and proper road grading so that roadway will not be prone to flooding & erosion

Pools of water on the road after rains

Contractor: Project Engineer

Bridge drainage & grading integrated in Construction Cost: PhP________



2.2Monitoring of quality of construction works

Poor M&E or lack of it can result to sub-standard construction or use of sub-standard materials, potentially resulting to structural damages which can unnecessarily expose FMR users to hazards and accidents

Good Maintenance result to Quality Assurance for sustainability of FMR

Regular Project M&E integrates environmental M&E on conformance to original design/specs

Allocation of sufficient budget for project M&E

Designate, deputize or enter into an agreement with the barangay LGU or local community for transparent M&E of construction works

Provision for Contractor’s performance bond or withholding final payment until repairs are done before turn-over by the Contractor to the LGU/PO/NGO

Occurrence of damages during construction

Visual presence of sub-standard materials

% completion per schedule and budget

Contractor: QC/QA Engineer

LGU:MPMIU/SPMU/MEO, Brgy. Govt.

Local Community Rep:Tribal/Purok Leaders

Cost of measures integrated in Project M&E: LGU operations PhP ________

3.0 Operation and Maintenance Un-sustained FMR

operations at optimum capacity due to structural damages

Prepare and implement an acceptable O & M Plan

Sustained and regular monitoring and maintenance & repair of FMR structure

Allocate sufficient budget for M&E and maintenance and repair

Designate, deputize or enter into an agreement with the barangay LGU or local community for M&E of the FMR status

Provide appropriate load limit sign at FMR approach to lessen/prevent passing of overloaded vehicles

No. of accurate reports on O&M status

No. of back-jobs

% repaired cracks

LGU:MPMIU/SPMU, MEO, Brgy. Govt.

Local Community Rep:

Tribal/Purok Leaders

Cost of measures integrated in Project M&E: LGU operations PhP________ (Note: Signages earlier integrated in Construction Cost)

Obstruction of water flow and aggregation of garbage

Regular removal of debris and other materials clogging the road culverts upstream of the FMR that may obstruct water flow

Occurrence of accumulated garbage upstream of the FMR

Occurrence of damming

LGU:Municipal & Brgt. Gov’t.

Local Community/ Road users

Debris Collection is LGU cost

Exposure of FMR users to vehicular hazards

Provide appropriate vehicular safety warning signs at FMR approach

# of accidents LGU:MPMIU/SPMU/MEO

Cost of signages was earlier integrated in Construction Cost

F. Financial Cost

1 Total Sub-Project Cost by Financing Source and cost Sharing

The Sub-Project is estimated to cost a total sum of Php 6,152,006.32 until its completion, 80% of the total cost is a grant by LP thru the MRDP,10% of GOP while the 10% shall be the LGU counterpart from both the provincial and municipal government.

2 Total Sub-Project Cost Breakdown (Direct and Indirect Costs)

The Sub-Project Cost Breakdown requires a total amount of Php 6,152,006.32 with Php 4,502,346.54 as the direct cost and Php 1,649,659.77 as the indirect cost. The details of the project cost in the technical Program of Work. Refer to table 21.

BREAKDOWN OF ESTIMATED COST

SOURCES OF FUNDS TOTAL AMOUT

LP (80%) LGU Equity



3. Capital Cost and Operation and Maintenance Cost Breakdown

a. Capital Cost

Table 22: SUB-PROJECT ESTIMATED COST

Project Description : Implementation Mode: By Contract

Project Duration: 180 C.D.

CONCRETING PORTION OF FMR Equipment Needed:Concrete Mixer, Grader, Road RollerConcrete vibrator, loader, Dumptrucks

Technical Personnels : Proj. Engineer, Mat’l Engineer Construction Foreman

Item no.

Item Description % Wt. Qty Unit Unit Cost Amount

103(6) EXCAVATION 0.21% 12.60 cu.m 761.90 9,600.00104(1) EMBANKMENT 10.48% 829.00 cu.m 568.97 471,677.81

105 SUBGRADE PREPARATION 2.44% 6,000.00 Sq.m 18.29 109,750.00200 AGGREGATE SUB-BASE COURSE 7.83% 750.00 cu.m 470.26 352,692.78201 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE 6.71% 600.00 cu.m 503.33 302,000.95

311(1) PCCP,Plain 71.35% 4,000.00 Sq.m 803.16 3,212,625.00500(1) RCCP (0.90 Mø) 0.70% 7.00 l.m 4,514.29 31,600.00



506 STONE MASONRY 0.28% 4.00 Cu.m 3,100.00 12,400.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST 100.00% 4,502,346.54

The municipal government had put up an initial equity for the maintenance of the sub-project. Respective barangays had also expressed commitment to sustain the maintenance of the project. Hence, a five (5) year operation and maintenance of the sub-project will be managed by the Municipal Engineering Office.

b. Maintenance Cost

Routine maintenance is done annually for rural roads based on DPWH policy and normally is not affected by traffic. For this particular project, the following estimates are the cost of maintenance.

A. FIXED COST P96,401.30

1. Vegetable Control 35,901.702. Cleaning Repair of Culvert 25,331.803. Cleaning Side Ditches 35,167.80

B. CLIMATE LOSS OF GRAVEL 125,043.75

TOTAL P221,445.00

4. Status of LGU Equity Availability and LFC Certification

The local government has already appropriated funds for its counterpart for this project and any time the Local Finance Committee can issue certification to this effect.

G. Financial and Economic Analysis

1. Valuation of Project Benefits

While the sub-project is being implemented for one hundred Eighty (180) calendar days, it is expected to benefit income as a result of direct labor both for skilled and unskilled laborers. Based on the program of work, the cost of skilled labor amounts to Php 104,214.46 while the unskilled labor is Php 352,545.32 or a total of Php 456,759.78

a. The Projected Influence Area

The existing agricultural land use of the sub-project (as shown in Table 23) is placed at 867.62 has. more or less. Major crops in the influence area are rice, coconut, corn, mango and banana. Rice constitutes 50 has., corn has a total area of 60 has., banana with 20 has. while coconut and other crops has a total area of 40 has.



ROAD INFLUENCE AREA

a. Population within the Direct Influence Area and Other Areas to Benefit from the Road Facility

There are 1,451 households that would directly benefit from the sub-project translating 6,467 persons (as shown in Table 24). This is based on the actual survey conducted by Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) staff and validated by LGU staff.

TABLE No. 24. Population within the Direct Influence Area of Beneficiaries

BARANGAYPOPULATION HOUSEHOLDS

Annual Population

Growth Rate

Ave. Annual Real Income Growth Rate per Capita

Cabpangi 2,443 507 2.88 1.9Gumaga 4,024 944 2.78 2.1Total 6,467 1,451 2.83 (Ave) 2.00 (Ave)

Source : CBMS 2008

b. Existing Vehicular Traffic Based on Traffic Survey Results and Indicating Representative Vehicles, Passenger Occupancy/Average Daily Trips and Traveled Daily Distance .


LAND USE Cabpangi Gumaga Total

1. CROP AREA (Hectares) A. Rice 20.00 30.00 50.00

B. Corn 25.00 35.00 60.00

C. Banana 5.00 15.00 20.00

D. Coconut/Others 10.00 30.00 40.00

TOTAL 60.00 110.00 170.00

Source: OMAG2009, Libungan


Based on the Motor Vehicle survey conducted by the sub-project influence area there are about 12 units of motor vehicles operating as per 2010 records. Refer on table 25.

Table 25: Existing Vehicular Traffic Based on Traffic Survey ResultsBarangay Existing mode

of Transportation

in the Area

Number of

Vehicles (units)

Average Operating Days per

Year

Ave. Loading capacity

AverageNumber of Daily

Trips

Observed Transport fares for

Passenger/ Cargo

AverageTraveled Distance

(km)

Origin to Destination

Cabpangi Jeepneys

Weapon Truck

Tricycle

3

2

4

120

120

120

18 persons

8 tons

7 persons

2

2

3

P25

P30

P25

4

4

4

Poblacion to project site

Batiocan Habal-habal Motorcycle

10 120 4 person 3 35 4 Poblacion to project site

Total 12 8

c. Direct Jobs from Construction

The sub-project will be implemented in one hundred eighty (180) calendar days. Several direct jobs will result from this project both for the skilled and unskilled laborers with corresponding labor cost amounting to Php 104,214.46 and Php 352,545.32 respectively.

d. Adjustment of Financial Values to Economic

e. EIRR, NPV, BCR Results (See Economic Analysis)

EIRR = 32.4%BCR = 1.67NPV = 3,745 @15%


LIBUNGAN, NORTH COTABTOLIBUNGAN, NORTH COTABTO

Feasibility Study for the Construction of Three(3) units RCBC at Sinapangan-Kiloyao RoadFeasibility Study for the Construction of Three(3) units RCBC at Sinapangan-Kiloyao Road

fs con. katitisan-cabpangi rd..doc

Documents