ftk studies: h hh bbbb ftk physics case meeting 11/03/05 erik brubaker university of chicago
Post on 19-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
FTK Studies: Hhhbbbb
FTK Physics Case Meeting
11/03/05
Erik Brubaker
University of Chicago
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 2
Organization• Web page here: http
://hep.uchicago.edu/~brubaker/ftk/– Links to previous meetings– Mailing list– Information about tools, e.g. L1 response
parameterizations– Analysis code snippets, e.g. jet trigger combinatorics– Collect useful plots, results
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 3
Topics• Hhhbbbb process, signal sample
• SHERPA multijet background sample
• Some event rates
• Next steps
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 4
Reminder: Strategy• Making the physics case for FTK means studying
signal and background trigger rates for several processes.
• For now, quantify improvements as a function of increase in L1 rate.– In parallel, studies of FTK speed and efficiency will tell
us the magnitude of that increase.
• Use fully simulated events to parameterize the L1 jet and tau trigger response vs ATLFAST jet pT. Then various processes for physics studies can be studied using ATLFAST.
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 5
Response parameterization• Functional form:
tried & true double Gaussian.– No pathological
behaviors– Second Gaussian
can take care of high tails (?)
• Can be modified & improved as needed.
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 6
Double Higgs—Process• Resonant production of
lightest MSSM neutral scalar Higgs h0 through the heavier H0.
• Previous study (ATL-PHYS-97-104)– For MH=300 GeV and tan(=3, S/sqrt(B) of 5.7 can
be reached using 300 fb-1; this requires 4 jets with ET>40 GeV and ||<2.5.
– For lower integrated luminosity, more tricks are needed and jets down to 20 GeV are preferred.
– They concluded trigger rates probably prohibitive.
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 7
Signal Sample• Contrary to last time’s claim, one can use Pythia
for resonant Hhh production.– mH = 300 GeV
– mh = 130 GeV
– Pythia reports = 2 fb• Not sure I’m working in a consistent MSSM world.
• Earlier studies used low tan (so lower mh), and ≈ 2 pb.
• Generated 10M events, so far only fast simulation.
• Should check sensitivity to mH, mh.
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 8
Signal sample• Quite low jet pT,
especially for j4.
• Probably want multiple trigger thresholds.
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 9
SHERPA event generator• Many of our processes have backgrounds with
four jets in the final state.– Want accurate ME description of kinematics.
• SHERPA: developed by Dresden group.– http://www.physik.tu-dresden.de/~krauss/hep/
• Generator of generators, like CompHEP etc.• Handles consistently boundary between matrix
element and parton shower emissions.• Produces unweighted events.• Not widely used, tested in ATLAS.
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 10
SHERPA multijet sample• Unexpected distributions
of njet, jet pT.
• Expected higher <njet> for higher-order ME—opposite is true.
• PS/ME boundary is set to 50 GeV.
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 11
SHERPA multijet sample• No obvious “turn-on” of add’l jets from ME.
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 12
Signal & Background L1 rates• Use fast simulated signal & SHERPA samples.
– Want Pythia dijets too, but these are more complicated.
• Require at least 4 ATLFAST jets inside ||<2.8.• Find the probability for the event to have four jets
passing a 40 (60, 80, 100) GeV trigger.– Want multiple trigger thresholds as well, but that is more
complicated.
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 13
Beginnings of an L1 rate tableSample Signal Pyth dijet SHERPA
x-section 2 pb 24.6 ub
N Events 110k 10k
Eff,#/fb-1
40 5.8%,116 0.17%, 42M
60 1.7%, 34 0.049%, 12M
80 0.64%, 13 0.022%, 5.4M
100 0.29%, 6 0.012%, 3M
Nov 3, 2005 FTK Physics Case Meeting 14
Next steps• Get full simulation of Hhh4b.
– Check that L1 response param. matches observed rate– Work out analysis more thoroughly—need to
determine improvement from FTK relative to some “state of the art”.
• Generate large SHERPA multijet sample.
• What other background samples are needed?
• Revisit L1 response—improve as needed.