futures volume 9 issue 3 1977 [doi 10.1016%2f0016-3287%2877%2990040-4] andré van dam -- defining...

Upload: manticora-venerabilis

Post on 03-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 9 Issue 3 1977 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2877%2990040-4] Andr Van Dam -- Defining Water

    1/3

    25 Ssience Fiction Survey/Conferences

    The book is of interest as further

    development of the series, but in the

    end I was disappointed. It is not well-

    integrated; the philosophical quotes

    that begin each chapter on the nature

    of religion and time, are never re-

    flected in the actual plot. How Pauls

    religion has affected the social struc-

    tures of Dune or the empire is not

    clear, nor was I ever able to grasp what

    the childrens ability to foresee/alter

    the future enables them to do in the

    present and why. New terms and

    concepts are introduced that are not

    foreshadowed in the earlier books,

    causing some confusion, and the ending

    (archetypal Superman) is sexist to

    boot. So, if youve started the trilogy,

    finish it with this book; otherwise,

    read Briton

    ONFEREN ES

    Defining water management for the 1980s

    The United Nations Water Con-

    ference, Mar de1 Plats, Argentina,

    March 1977

    W TERmanagement will assume a new

    role in the 198Os, if only to avoid an

    impending water crisis. But how will

    this crisis manifest itself? The water

    conference greatly contributed to a

    definition of the crisis. Very briefly,

    there are four basic problems which

    have been ignored for too long, if only

    because water seemed abundant for

    ever and was very cheap:

    he worlds water is highly unevenly

    distributed between areas, seasons

    and years,

    common ownership of river basins

    and lakes foments political and other

    conflicts,

    0 water contamination remains largely

    unchecked, and, last but not least,

    only a small portion of the worlds

    water resources can be used at

    present.

    The water supply

    The worlds total water stock is guessti-

    mated at 1.4 billion km3. More than

    97 of this is seawater which cannot

    yet be desalted on a large scale, eco-

    nomically. This leaves about 40 million

    km3 of surface water (mainly ice caps

    and glaciers) and groundwater.

    That limits the water supply to 8

    million km3 of groundwater and 0.2

    million km3 of surface water, mostly

    rivers, and lakes. However, much of the

    groundwater is beyond mans present

    exploitation as it lies at a depth of more

    than 800 metres. The usable stock is

    thus limited to 0.3 million km3 of

    groundwater and 0.2 million km3 of

    surface water. [One km3 equals 1

    trillion ( 10i2) litre.]

    The limit of withdrawal is the rain

    and snow, the precipitation-the cru-

    cial stage of the cycle which starts with

    evaporation of the oceans, rivers, lakes

    and the land. This is a never ending

    cycle, natures one great desalination

    plant. The daily water cycle averages

    1100 km3, of which 250 km3 fall on the

    land where man may use it. Except that

    about 70 of that precipitation never

    enters the streamflow. Before man can

    use it, it evaporates or is absorbed by

    plants and transpired through their

    leaves.

    The water cycle is more complex

    than pictured here, but it does imply

    that we face a limited water supply.

    The demand for water

    All the economic sectors need water:

    in most industrialised nations, energy

    FUTURES June 977

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 9 Issue 3 1977 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2877%2990040-4] Andr Van Dam -- Defining Water

    2/3

    onferences

    251

    and manufacturing industry now make

    the heaviest claim on water eg mining,

    building, primary metal plants, re-

    fineries, pulp and paper industry,

    chemical industry, and the food and

    beverage industries.

    One must distinguish between water

    consumption and water use. Industry

    uses generally the same water twice or

    even more frequently.

    The crux of the matter is not how

    much water industry uses, but rather

    what it uses the water for, how much

    it pays for it, and to what extent it

    contam~ates the water which it returns

    to the streamflow.

    At present,

    water is not an eco-

    nomic factor in industry. The average

    cost of water in the total plant cost

    varies from 0.1 o/0 to 1 loo/&--and occa-

    sionally reaches 2.5 . Given the inevi-

    tably high cost of water management,

    one can expect fresh water to become

    more expensive.

    Taken as a whole, North American

    industry recycles water once, but some

    industries recycle water twice. The

    degree of recycling and reuse is

    rising every year (a ton of steel requires

    about 200 000 litre of water, a ton of

    paper 300 000 litre and a ton of syn-

    thetic rubber 2 000 000 litre).

    Currently, industrys most important

    competitors for water are energy and

    agriculture (it takes an average 10 litre

    of water to produce one kWh).

    Worldwide, agriculture uses three-

    quarters of all the water consumed.

    Irrigated land requires a million gallons

    of water per acre on an average (10

    million Iitre per hectare)-but the

    high-yield miracle rice and corn use

    quite a lot more. In many countries it

    takes 10 litre of water for a kilo of

    springbeans, 10 000 litre for a dozen

    Iarge eggs, and 30 000 Iitre for a kiIo of

    prime beef. These quantities depend of

    course on a variety of factors, such as

    humidity, light, soil moisture, tempera-

    ture and wind. However, the water

    intake can average one hundred times

    the dry weight of a plant during one

    growing season. Vegetables use much

    more water than men or animaIs,

    because their throughput of water is

    tremendous. (One hectare of potatoes

    demands 4 million litre of water.)

    If, as is expected, the need for irriga-

    tion rises more sharply than the

    demand for energy and industrial goods

    then competition for water will be

    fierce in many parts of the world.

    Cooperation

    The heart of the matter at the con-

    ference was, obviously, the need to

    manage water judiciously by a com-

    prehensive cooperative system between

    nations as well as between users. While

    the technicians will be called upon to

    expand the available amount of surface

    water and groundwater, the private

    sector will be invited to cooperate with

    the public sector in water management.

    The cure-all for the water crisis is

    called water management, but it

    means different things to different

    people. At the water conference, the

    fo~owing facets of rational management

    were mostly discussed

    o

    Improve the distribution of water, by

    constructing surface reservoirs, carry-

    ing water from surplus to deficit

    territories, and protecting the soil of

    natural watersheds.

    Expand, in the same vein, the use of

    underground storage.

    a Enhance the efficiency in the use of

    water by recycling, and by reducing

    waste.

    Ameliorate the quality of water by

    purifying sewage and keeping waste-

    waters away from river basins ancl

    lakes.

    Expand the yield of water by desdlt-

    ing seawater, reduce losses in eva-

    poration, and modify the weather.

    Rational water management would

    require a global information system

    using communications satellites. The

    latter are to measure rain, and river

    gauges all over the world, computerise

    the results and provide the nations with

    FUTURES June 977

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 9 Issue 3 1977 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2877%2990040-4] Andr Van Dam -- Defining Water

    3/3

    5

    Conferences

    up to date information on the hydro-

    logical cycle. The system would chart

    river flows and levels by latitude and

    longitude. Eventually it would be used

    to measure groundwater levels, soil

    moisture,

    snow cover, atmospheric

    water vapour, lake levels, and salinity in

    estuaries. In the industrial sphere, it

    would imply the creation of closed

    circuit systems, whereby water circu-

    lates without risking contamination of

    lakes, streams and river basins. This

    would in addition reduce the absolute

    withdrawal of water from the hydro-

    logical cycle.

    Rational water management assumes

    a high degree of cooperation between

    countries and professions. Last but not

    least, it assumes that in view of the ever

    rising demand for water (6 per year,

    so far) and the constant volume of

    supply, the price of water will have to

    be commensurate with the usefulness of

    Western Europe in transition

    its application and the contamination

    of the process, end-, and by-products.

    Hitherto, water management has

    been the bailiwick of the public sector.

    The role of industry in water manage-

    ment has been almost nil. This may well

    explain why so little new technology has

    been developed in the area of water

    supply and distribution.

    Since industry was all but absent at

    the water conference, its future role in

    water management and cooperation

    remains to be defined. It could well be

    that a steep rise in the cost of water,

    advocated inter alia by the World Bank,

    will render industry sensitive to the

    challenge of water management, and

    will render the public authorities

    sensitive to a valuable contribution by

    industry.

    Andre van Darn

    Argentina

    International Symposium on

    Europes future: new initiatives

    and methods in managing

    change London 30-3 1 March

    1977

    This symposium, a follow-up to an

    earlier one,l brought together partici-

    pants whose governments were all

    under threat:

    eg being forced into

    coalitions by new political, social and

    economic conditions, or into devaluing

    the currency. The commonality of

    conditions, particularly the paradoxes,

    in European countries was readily

    established. For example there is in

    many

    countries

    an incompatibility

    between individuals desire to take

    initiatives and government unwilling-

    ness to reward resourcefulness and offer

    security to such individuals.

    Throughout the meeting a constant

    underlying theme was that Western

    Europe is however on the eve of major

    change. Participants endeavoured to

    characterise the changes and to suggest

    action points where change could also

    be catalysed.

    Most felt that initiatives would have

    to be taken at a nongovernmental,

    individual, and corporate level. As

    Terence Price (UK) pointed out, a

    basic problem in peacetime, where a

    major objective is the preservation of a

    pluralistic society, is that of establishing

    a consensus, of providing a vision.

    He suggested that the vision would

    come from the political and social

    institutions, especially if these were

    modelled along US lines. It was

    replied, first that US practices are

    inappropriate to the European con-

    text, and second that there is an initial

    need for thinkers and philosophers to

    point out the fundamental problems,

    ask the right questions, and provide

    the vision, before establishing the

    institutions.

    FUTURES June 977