fy2019 q1 report - dhs · 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
TRANSCRIPT
Q1 FY 2019
Division of Youth Services QUARTERLY STATISTICAL
REPORT 1st Quarter FY 2019
(July 2018-September 2018)
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 1 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Arkansas Division of Youth Services FY 2019 1st Quarter Statistical Report
Table of Contents
DYS FY 2019 Statistics-Highlights for First Quarter ......................................................2 DYS Vision and Mission Statements ................................................................................4 Figure 1: Commitments by Offense ..............................................................................5 Figure 2: First Commitments vs. Recommits ...............................................................6 Figure 3: Violent vs. Non-Violent Offenses ................................................................6 Figure 4: Commitments by Age, Gender and Race ....................................................7 Figure 5: Commitments by Age and Gender ...............................................................8 Figure 6: Commitments by Race ....................................................................................9 Figure 7: Commitments by Race by County ................................................................10 Figure 8: Commitments by District ...............................................................................12 Figure 9: Commitments by District by Year ................................................................13 Figure 10: Total Commitments for Quarter with Reference to Previous Years ......15 Figure 11: Youth Served by Community-Based Provider (CBP) Services ...............16 Appendix I: Map of AR DYS Treatment Centers, Programs, and Providers ..................17 Appendix II: Map of AR Juvenile Detention Centers .........................................................18
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 2 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
DYS FY 2019 First Quarter Statistics – Highlights
Total Commitments for First Quarter FY 2017-2019
2019 = 83 2018 = 115 2017 = 111
Commitments by Offense (Figure 1)
Felony = 67% Misdemeanor = 28%
First Commitments vs. Recommits (Figure 2)
First Commits = 77% Recommits = 23%
Violent vs. Non-Violent Offenses (Figure 3)
Violent offenses = 83% Non-violent offenses = 17%
Commitments by Age, Gender, Race (Figure 4, 5, 6)
Total commitments, gender: 84% male, 16% female AR youth population, gender: 51% male, 49% female Total commitments, race: 51% African American, 42% white, 7% other AR youth population, race: 20% African American, 77% white, 3% other Ages of committed youth: 11-18 years Over half of total commitments were between 16-17 years old
Commitments by County (Figure 7)
Top committing counties this quarter 1) Jefferson, Saline (7) 2) Miller (6) 3) Pulaski, White, Washington (5)
Commitments by District (Figure 8)
Top committing districts this quarter 1) 13th – Calhoun, Cleveland, Columbia, Dallas, Ouachita, and Union Counties (8) 2) 11th West – Jefferson and Lincoln Counties; 22nd – Saline County (7) 3) 7th – Grant and Hot Spring Counties; 8th South – Lafayette and Miller Counties (6)
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 3 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Commitments by District by Year (Figure 9)
Largest Reduction in commitments 1) 6th – Perry and Pulaski Counties (-6) 2) 12th – Sebastian County (-5)
Largest Increase in Commitments
1) 17th – Prairie and White Counties; 16th – Cleburne, Fulton, Independence, Izard, and Stone Counties (2)
2) 1st – Cross, Lee, Monroe, Phillips, Saint Francis, and Woodruff Counties; 8th South – Lafayette and Miller Counties; 9th West – Howard, Little River, Pike, and Sevier Counties; 20th – Faulkner, Searcy, and Van Buren Counties; 23rd – Lonoke County (1)
Youth Served by Community Based Providers (CBP) Services (Figure 11)
Top Districts with youth and families served 1) 2nd – Clay, Craighead, Crittenden, Greene, Mississippi, and Poinsett Counties (244) 2) 4th – Madison and Washington Counties (200) 3) 11th West – Jefferson and Lincoln Counties (198)
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 4 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
DYS Vision Statement Arkansas’s juvenile justice system is a leader in reform and
collaboration across the state, working to prevent most youth from ever needing legal intervention and providing those that do with effective rehabilitation and reintegration; youth that become
involved with the juvenile justice system are treated, educated, and equipped with the tools they need to find success as
productive and responsible members of collective society.
DYS Mission Statement The Division of Youth Services’ mission is to provide effective
community-based prevention, diversion, appropriate correction and rehabilitation, improved education and thorough aftercare in
order to enhance the comprehensive well-being of the youth of Arkansas involved in the juvenile justice system.
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 5 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Figure 1: Commitments by Offense July–September 2018
46
21
4
10
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Probation revocations and violations are delineated by original charge: felony
or misdemeanor.
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 6 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Figure 2: First Commitments vs. Recommits July–September 2018
WHAT ARE RECOMMITS?
Recommit(ment)s represent youth who have been previously committed to DYS and received a new order of commitment this quarter; in short, this is not their first time in DYS custody.
19
64
Recommit
First Commit
Figure 3: Violent vs. Non-Violent Offenses July–September 2018
83%
17%
Non Violent
Violent
VIOLENT OFFENSES:
1st & 2nd degree Murder Kidnapping Aggravated Robbery Rape 1st degree Battery Terroristic Act 1st & 2nd degree Sexual
Assault 1st degree Domestic Battery Residential Burglary Aggravated Residential
Burglary Unlawful Discharge of a
Firearm from a Vehicle Criminal Use of a Firearm
from a Vehicle (FB) Capital Murder
Violent Offenses are defined by Arkansas § 5-73-104 (d)(2) including attempts, solicitation or conspiracy to commit.
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 7 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Age (yrs.)
African- American
White Other TOTAL
male female male female male female
11 2 1 3
12 0
13 1 1 1 3
14 4 1 4 9
15 7 3 6 3 1 20
16 9 2 10 2 1 24
17 10 2 9 1 22
18 2 2
TOTAL 33 9 32 3 5 1 83
Figure 4: Commitments by Age, Sex, and Race July–September 2018
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 8 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
0
2
4
6
8
10
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
FemaleCommitments: 13
Figure 5: Commitments by Age and Gender July–September 2018
11 yrs
12 yrs
13 yrs
14 yrs
15 yrs
16 yrs
17 yrs
18 yrs
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Total Commitments: 83
0
5
10
15
20
25
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
MaleCommitments: 70
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 9 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Figure 6: Commitments by Race July–September 2018
Statewide, African-American youth make up 20 percent of the adolescent population, while white youth account for 77 percent.
Data Source: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/asp/comparison_display.asp
51%42%
7%
black
white
other
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 10 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Committing County African-
American White Other TOTAL
Arkansas 1 1 Ashley Baxter
Benton Boone
Bradley Calhoun
Carroll 1 2 Chicot Clark Clay
Cleburne 1 2 Cleveland
Columbia 1 1 Conway
Craighead 1 1 Crawford
Crittenden 3 3 Cross
Dallas Desha 1 3 7 Drew 1 2
Faulkner 3 3 Franklin
Fulton 1 2 Garland 2 2
Grant 4 8 Greene 1 2
Hempstead 1 1 Hot Spring 2 4
Howard 1 2 5 Independence
Izard 1 2 Jackson
Jefferson 6 1 8 Johnson
Lafayette Lawrence
Lee Lincoln
Figure 7: Commitments by Race by County July–September 2018
* NOTE
Zeros have been omitted from this chart
for visual clarity
*
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 11 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Committing County African-
American White Other TOTAL
Little River Logan Lonoke 1 1
Madison Marion
Miller 5 1 6 Mississippi
Monroe 1 1 Montgomery
Nevada Newton
Ouachita 3 3 Perry
Phillips 1 1 Pike
Poinsett Polk 1 1 Pope
Prairie Pulaski 5 5
Randolph Saint Francis
Saline 2 4 1 7 Scott
Searcy Sebastian 1 1 2
Sevier 1 1 2 Sharp 1 1 Stone
Union 4 4 Van Buren
Washington 4 1 5 White 4 1 5
Woodruff Yell 1 1
TOTAL 42 35 6 83
Figure 7: Commitments by Race by County (continued) July–September 2018
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 12 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
2
5
1
5
5
6
1
6
5
5
1
7
2
8
1
3
5
2
1
1
3
7
1
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th North
8th South
9th East
9th West
10th
11th East
11th West
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th East
18th West
19th East
19th West
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
Figure 8: Commitments by District July–September 2018
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 13 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Figure 9: Commitments by District by Year July–September 2018
5
10
2
1
3
7
6
3
5
0
1
12
1
10
1
7
4
5
1
11
6
2
5
1
4
7
1
11
2
5
1
5
0
5
6
1
6
0
5
5
1
7
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th North
8th South
9th East
9th West
10th
11th East
11th West
Q1-FY2017
Q1-FY2018
Q1-FY2019
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 14 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Figure 9: Commitments by District by Year (cont.) July–September 2018
1
20
0
4
2
3
3
1
0
2
2
2
5
0
7
12
1
1
1
3
3
2
1
4
2
1
11
0
2
8
0
1
3
5
2
1
1
0
3
0
7
1
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th East
18th West
19th East
19th West
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
Q1-FY2017
Q1-FY2018
Q1-FY2019
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 15 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Commitments for Q1 of this year (83) are down from last year (115) and down from FY 2016 (111).
Figure 10: Total Commitments for Quarter with Reference to Previous Years
July–September 2018
July August SeptemberFY2017 29 42 40FY2018 30 33 52FY2019 27 22 34
2017
2018
2019
-5
5
15
25
35
45
55
# o
f Co
mm
itme
nts
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 16 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
Figure 11: Youth Served by Community-Based Provider (CBP) Services by Judicial District
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th North
8th South
9th East
9th West
10th
11th East
11th West
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th East
18th West
19th East
19th West
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
Custody
Non-Custody
Custody Case: committed youth in community receiving aftercare services, or in residential care and preparing for transition while CBP works with facility and family to develop aftercare plan.
Non-Custody Case: A. youth receiving services in the community as referred/ diverted by court recommendation, B. youth who has been Adjudicated Delinquent or Adjudicated FINS, C. youth from another state who is being served under the Interstate Compact for Juveniles.
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 17 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
DYS ProgramsJuly 30, 2018
Residential Beds (Max)
1 120
2 28
3 32
4 16/G & 24/B
5 40
6 32
7 32
324
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
3 Vera Lloyd Therapeutic Group Home
4 Youth Bridge Therapeutic Group Home (Male)
5 Youth Bridge Substance Abuse Treatment
6 Arkansas State Hospital
Outpatient Assessment/Treatment Statewide Assessments
Substance Abuse
CCS Assessment
UAMS Adolescent Sexual Adjustment Program
Little Rock
Therapeutic GH
Therapeutic GHMonticello
Total Beds
Lewisville
9E, 18E
Fayetteville
Morrilton
1, 17
7, 22
Hot Springs
Sex Offender Tx
Lewisville Juvenile Treatment Center
Comprehensive Juvenile Services
Consolidated Youth Services
Alexander Arkansas Juvenile Assessment & Treatment Center
Harrisburg
Mansfield
12, 18W, 21
Judicial Districts
Professional Counseling Associates
Phoenix Youth & Family Services Crossett
Lonoke
Dermott
2, 3Jonesboro
Dermott Juvenile Treatment Center
Counseling Clinic, Inc.
5, 15, 16, 20
Regional Treatment Centers and Correctional Facility
Dermott Juvenile Correctional Facility Dermott
Harrisburg Juvenile Treatment Center
Colt Colt Juvenile Treatment Center
Mansfield Juvenile Treatment Center
Location
Community Services, Inc.
LocationCommunity Based Youth Serivce
Providers
Marion East Arkansas Youth Services
Ft. Smith
Benton
Ouachita Children's Center
10
23
13, 8N, 8S, 9W
6,11E, 11WPine Bluff/Little Rock
4, 14, 19E, 19W
Texarkana
Youth Bridge, Inc.
Consolidated Youth Services ASAP
Specialized Residential Programs
Sex Offender Tx
Service Type Location
United Family Services
Fayetteville
SW AR Counseling & Mental Health Center
Jonesboro
Fayetteville
Fayetteville
Piney Ridge Psychiatric Center
Little Rock Mental Health
Little Rock
1
2
3
4
7
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
51
3
5
6
6
7
8
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
11
11 1111
1
3
2,4,5
5,6
6
Map of AR DYS Treatment Centers, Specialized Residential Programs, and Community-Based Providers
Appendix I
DHS | DYS Quarterly Report, Q1 FY 2019 (Jul–Sep 2018) 18 Data Source: Rite Track, DYS Information Management System
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
1. *Arkansas County JDC, DeWitt
2. Benton County JDC, Bentonville
3. Craighead County JDC, Jonesboro
4. Crittenden County JDC, West Memphis
5. Faulkner County JDC, Conway
6. *Garland County JDC, Hot Springs
7. *Independence County JDC, Batesville (White River JDC )
8. *Jefferson County JDC, Pine Bluff
9. *Miller County JDC, Texarkana
10. Mississippi County JDC, Luxora
11. Pulaski County JDC, Little Rock
12. Sebastian County JDC, Fort Smith
13. Washington County JDC, Fayetteville
14. *Yell County JDC, Danville
Arkansas Juvenile Detention Centers
* Indicates Division of Youth Services (DYS) six (6) Intergovernmental Agreement counties.
11
Map of AR Juvenile Detention Centers Appendix II