1

Garware Polyester Ltd. Aurangabad

2

Company Profile

3

Garware Polyester Limited is the pioneer in the field of polyester film. The Company has developed various types of films and is exporting to 57 countries in World. The company has excellent infrastructure and strong commitment to Safety, Quality, Energy Conservation , Environment preservation and R&D.Winner of Highest Export Award-Plex council (Govt. of India, Ministry of Commerce) since last 20 years.Winner of “Energy Efficient Unit- 2010” by CII.Winner of 1st award in 2009 in “Plastic Category” on National Level (NECA)Winner of 2nd award for excellence in Energy Conservation and Management in 5th Maharashtra State Level Award competition in year 2008 in category “Other Industries“. The company has set up cross functional Energy Conservation Cell, which focuses on energy management and improvement. The company recognizes the importance of energy conservation, not only to improve the bottom line but also to help the environment and society at large for sustainable growth.

Unit Profile

4

Process Flow Diagram

5

6

7

ENCON

8

Garware Polyester Limited plays vital role for producing variety of products with high level of quality standard and prioritizes energy value for the final product.Our mission is :

To produce products with minimum use of energy. Use of cleaner technologies wherever possible and ensuring efficient and uninterrupted supply of utilities to plants.

This, we plan by following ways.Efficient energy generation, utilization and distribution. Continuous evaluation of performance of plant equipments and processes to achieve most efficient, high standard quality products. Targeting the under-performance equipments and processes for improvement.Monitoring and targeting the specific energy consumption to achieve best possible as compared to past performance.Use of internal and external expertise to achieve targeted performance. Train employees and implement ideas of energy conservation thorough small ENCON teams.

M S AdsulDirector-Technical

Energy Management Policy

9

ENCON Team Structure

DIRECTOR - TECHNICAL

ENGINEERING HEAD

DY. GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL UTILITY

ENCON TEAMFILM PLANT

ENCON TEAM POLYMERISATION

PLANT

ENCON TEAMCENTRAL UTILITY

ENCON TEAMCHIKALTHANA

PLANT

10

Energy Monitoring

• 1.Daily Energy report is generated by Central Utility on daily basis and

circulated to all concerned.

• 2.Monthly Based on daily energy report, monthly energy report is prepared

and circulated to all concerned. Comparison & analysis of energy consumption is done with previous months and deviations are studied for reduction in Energy Bills.

• 3.Yearly Yearly reports generated from data collected as above. Specific energy consumptions are calculated and targets are set for

future. Major ENCON projects are listed in annual report.

11

ENCON Methodology

1. Identification of high energy consuming equipments/processes through internal & external audits.

2. Elimination of inefficient equipment & substitution with new & efficient technologies.

3. Continuous energy performance monitoring through statistical analysis.

4. Brainstorming in small group activities for innovative ideas.

5. Reduction in Carbon foot print & implementation of green projects.

6. Benchmarking with other competitors.

7. Involvements of employees through suggestion schemes & competitions.

12

Identification of Major losses 1. Failure losses - Breakdown loss 2. Setup / adjustment

losses 3. Cutting blade loss 4. Start up loss 5. Minor stoppage / Idling loss. 6. Speed loss - operating

at low speeds. 7. Defect / rework loss 8. Scheduled downtime

loss 9. Management loss 10. Operating motion loss 11. Line organization loss 12. Logistic loss 13. Measurement and adjustment loss 14. Material Yield loss15. Energy loss 16. Die, jig and tool

breakage loss

13

ENCON IMPLEMENTED PROJECTS

14

Electricity F.Oil Others

(Lakhs (kWh) (KL)

1 Provision of VFD for VAHP Cooling tower Fan.Central Utility, Waluj.

0.52 0 0 1.81 0.20

2 Convertion of VAHP m/c.from single effect to double effect. Central Utility, Waluj. 0 1123.12 0 207.55 60.00

3 Commissioning of 40TR & 100TR VCC Chiller m/c. C.U. Waluj.

-10.58 313.60 0 20.91 4.00

4 Convertion of Boiler from furnace oil to Bio-coal firing. Central utility, Waluj. 0.00 231.52 0 42.78 0.20

5 Provision of cooling water to poly plant cutter instead of chilled water. Poly Plant, Waluj

0 528 0 97.57 0.50

6 Optimisation of ejector cooling tower. Poly Plant, Waluj.

5.04 0 0 17.64 0.50

7 Palletizing return water pump replaced by high efficiency pump. Film Plant, CHK.

0.35 0 0 1.23 0.30

8 K.G.Khosla compressor operation stopped by taking portable compressor in line. Film Plant, CHK.

1.20 0 0 4.20 0.00

Sub Total-3.48 2196.24 0.00 393.70 65.70

Total savings in (Rs. Lakhs)

S. No.

Project description

Achievement of energy savings per year basis Investment incurred on the

project (Rs. Lakhs)

ENCON PROJECTS 2008-09

15

Electricity F.Oil Others

(Lakhs (kWh) (KL)

1 Installation of high efficiency screw chillers -12.60 1130 0 219.09 71.002 Commissioning of H.P.Ejectort 0 580.00 0 138.97 80.00

3 Optimisation of compressed air system. 3.03 0.00 0 12.42 0.00

4 Optimisation of chilled water system. 3.03 0.00 0 12.42 0.00

5 Provision of VFD to boiler F.D. fan 1.34 0 0 5.49 2.00

6 Replacement of 150 H.P. blower motor with 75 H.P. motor

1.00 0 0 4.10 0.00

7 VFD to biopeq feed pump in ETP 0.67 0 0 2.75 2.00

8 Aeropeq blower speed reduction in E.T.P. 0.58 0 0 2.38 0.08

9 VFD to C.W. return sump in Polyplant 0.67 0 0 2.75 2.00

10 EIL heater efficiency improvement. 0.00 70 0 16.77 10.00

Sub Total -2.28 1780.00 0.00 417.14 167.08

ENCON PROJ ECTS 2009-10

Year of Commissioning of

the projects

Project description Achievement of energy savings per year basis Investment incurred on the

project (Rs. Lakhs)

Total savings in (Rs. Lakhs)

S. No.

2009-10

16

ENCON PROJECTS 2010-11

Year of Commissionin

g of the projects

S. No. Project description Achievement of energy savings per year basis

Investment incurred on the project (Rs. Lakhs)

Electricity F.Oil Others Total savings in

(Rs. Lakhs)  (Lakhs

(kWh)(MT)  

2010-2011

1 EIL heater efficiency optimization. Central Utility, Waluj.

0.00 69.3 0 15.43 11.00

2 Polyplant cutter cooling tower. 7.2 0.00 0 29.38 15.00

3 Direct transfer of condensate from Glycol Recovery to De-aerator.

0.00 51.04 0 11.37 0.00

4 Stopping of MDO chilled water system and hook up from Central Utility.

2.38 0.00 0 9.69 0.00

5 Commissioning of Biomass fired Boiler.

0.00 1800.00 0 91.26 332.41

6 p.f. incentive at Waluj. 0.00 0.00 0 169.30 0.00

7 p.f.incentive at Chikalthana 0.00 0.00 0 76.69 0.00

8 Use of emulsified F.O. for Thermic fluid heater in CHK plant

0.55 0.00 0 2.26 1.50

9 Provision of VFD to TDO oven blower.in CHK plant

0.24 0.00 0 0.97 1.50

10 Secondary hot oil pump impeller trimming in CHK plant.

0.10 0 0 0.40 0.10

    Sub Total 10.47 1920.34 0.00 406.76 361.51

17

ENCON PROJECTS 2011-12

Year of Commissioning of the

projects

S. No.

Project description Achievement of energy savings per year basis Investment incurred on the project (Rs. Lakhs)

Electricity F.Oil Others Total savings in

(Rs. Lakhs)(Lakhs (kWh)

(KL)  

2011-2012 1 Thermal Fluid Heater (EIL) efficiency optimization. Central Utility, (Waluj)

0.00 69.3 0 18.04 11.00

2Waste heat recovery from boiler flue gases.(Waluj)

0 0.00 448 21.50 8.00

3 Direct transfer of condensate from Glycol recovery to de-aerator, Waluj.

0.00 0.00 200 9.60 0.00

4 Conversion of Aluminum blade to FRP blade for cooling tower fan (Waluj)

0.25 0.00 0 1.10 1.00

5 Provision of booster compressor for instrument air system (Waluj)

2.52 0.00 0 10.99 1.00

6 p.f. Incentive at waluj 0.00 0.00 0 190.44 0.007 p.f. Incentive at Chikalthana 0.00 0.00 0 84.95 0.00

8 Commissioning of 110 TR chiller & reducing VAHP load (Waluj) -5.91 0.00 1000 22.23 12.00

9 Operation of separate 13TR chiller for Kappa cooler stopped by transferring load to primary chilled water system. (Chikalthana)

1.85 0.00 0 8.06 8.06

10 Pneumatic booster installed & stopped operation of portable compressor. (Chikalthana)

0.34 0 0 1.46 0.50

11 Return water pump for twin screw vacuum system operation stopped by using gravity flow system. (Chikalthana)

0.17 0 0 0.73 0.00

12 Energy Efficient lighting used in L#2 TDO & slitter area. Total – 45 Nos (Chikalthana)

0.08 0 0 0.34 0.34

13 Rotary feeder installed at L#1 instead ventury system. (Chikalthana)

1.01 0 0 4.39 0.50

14 Replacement of 125W HPMV lamps by 23W CFL-60 nos. (Waluj)

0.27 0 0 1.17 0.50

    Sub Total 0.58 69.30 1648.00 375.00 42.90

18

ENCON PROJECTS 2012-13

Year of Commissioni

ng of the projects

S.NO. Project description

Achievement of Annual energy savings in 2012-13 Investment

incurred on the project

Rs. (Lakhs)

Electricity Fuels*

Total savings in (Rs. Lakhs)

(Lakhs kWh)

Coal (tonnes)

F.Oil Gas (lakh Nm3)

Total (fuel) in (MTOE)(kL)

2012-2013 1 Optimisation of Cooling tower pumps (at waluj) 7.35 0 0 0 0 44.06 0.5

2 Optimisation of chilled water pumps. (At waluj) 5.37 0 0 0 0 26.99 0.5

3 Optimisation of Therminol pumps. (at waluj) 3.1 0 0 0 0 19.2 0.75

4 Power factor incentive (at waluj) 0 0 0 0 0 277.66 0

5 Replacement of Cooling tower fan blades with FRP blades (at waluj) 0.15 0 0 0 0 0.76 0.75

6 Complete stoppage of FO Boiler (at waluj) 0 0 38.4 0 36.66 12.83 0

7 Replacement of Condenser water pump by low head. (chikalthana) 1.34 0 0 0 0 6.75 0.45

8 Provision of Rotary feeder for chips conveying instead of ventury system. (chikalthana) 1.01 0 0 0 0 5.07 1.2

9 Water Emulsification of furnace oil. (chikalthana) 0 0 81.66 0 77.96 27.3 9.5

10 Twin screw return water pump stopped by using gravity flow system. (chikalthana) 0.25 0 0 0 0 1.26 0

11 L#2 AHU No-3 water pump replaced by energy efficient pump. (chikalthana) 0.42 0 0 0 0 2.11 0.2

12 Power factor incentive (at chikalthana) 0 0 0 0 0 98.87 0

SUB TOTAL 16.68 0 120.06 0 114.63 500.5 13.85

19

ENCON SUMMARY - LAST 5 YRSYEAR No. of

Measuresimplemented(i)

Investmentmade(Rs.Lakhs)(ii

Savingsachieved(Rs. Lakhs/ year)(iii)

EnergyCost(Rs.Lakhs/year)(iv)

%Savingsof EnergyCost(iii /iv x100)

2008-2009 8 65.70 393.7 4730.70 8.32

2009-2010 10 178.00 417.14 5216.91 10.17

2010-2011 10 360.71 406.76 5025.71 8.28

2011-2012 10 42.9 375.00 5599.59 6.69

2012-2013 12 13.85 530.5 6407.11 8.30

20

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013220

230

240

250

260

270

280

290

300

291.80

271.76262.81

254.29 249.42

Chips - Specific Electrical Energy - kWhr/MT

6.88%

3.29%

3.24%1.92%

Energy Reduction – Chips Plant

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-20130

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.401.29 1.21

1.07 1.01

Chips - Specific Thermal Energy - Mkcal/MT

11.64%

5.61%

6.12%

10.42%

21

Energy Reduction – Film Plant

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013900

950

1000

1050

1100

1150

1200

1180.50

1116.06

1032.60 1030.49 1021.56

Film - Specific Electrical Energy - kWhr/MT

7.5%0.2% 0.87%

5.46%

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-20130

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.401.20

1.00 1.01 0.99

Film - Specific Thermal Energy - MkCal/MT

16.8%-1.1%

1.7%

18.91%

22

INNOVATIVE PROJECTS

23

ENCON Project : 1

Title : Poly Plant Cutter Cooling Tower• Loss no: 15• Background of the project : To reduce chilled water load.• Observation made :o Chilled water is used for Poly plant cutter for cooling of chips from 280°C to 40°C.o Cooling water can also be used for cutter cooling.• Technical and Financial AnalysisInvestment : Rs. 15 Lacs Implemented : Aug. 20091st year cost Saving : Rs. 29.38 Lacs Impact of implementation : Reduction in chilled water load by 200 TR/Hr.

• On annual basis Electricity cons. (Lacs kWh) Energy consumption before : 9.81 Energy consumption after : 2.61

24After

Before

25

Conversion of VAHP Machine Single Effect to Double Effect

26

Process Flow Diagram of Chilled Water System

VAHP MACHINE

Film Plant

Poly Plant

Batch Plant

Chilled water in

Chilled water out

Cooling water in

Cooling water out

Pump

Chilled water return from plants

Single effect Machine

Steam consumption single effect machine = 8.1 Kg/TR 27

28

Double Effect Machine

Condensor High Temp. Generator

Over flow pipe

Cooling Water

Absorber

Evaporator

Purge Pump

Diluted Solution

Inter Solution

Concentrated LiBr

Refrigerant

Chilled Water

Cooling Water

Refrigerant Vapour

Steam/ Flue Gases

Low temp. generator

Steam consumption Double effect machine = 4.1 Kg/TR

29

Single Effect Machine

Double Effect Machine

Steam consumption

8.1 Kg/TR 4.1 Kg/TR

Cost of SteamRs.

737 Lacs /Annum 373 Lacs /Annum

Cost Saving(fluctuates as per

FO Price)364 Lacs / Annum

Cost Saving Table

30

Machine Photographs

Single Effect Machine - Before Double Effect Machine - After

31

ENCON Project : 3

• Title : Commissioning of Biomass Fired Boiler• Loss No- 15• Background of the project : To reduce Furnace oil consumption for Boilers.• Observation made :• Cost of steam on briquette is almost half that of F.O. • Unused IAEC make F.O. fired boiler of 18 MT/Hr capacity is available.• Can be used by installing external furnace for biomass firing.• Existing underutilized go down can be used for boiler operation and briquette storage.• Technical and Financial Analysis :• Investment : Rs. 332 Lacs • Implemented : Jan. 2010• Impact of implementation :Reduction in Furnace Oil consumption.• Thereby reduction in SO2 by 108000 Kg/annum and estimated reduction in

CER by 11000 per annum.

Savings achieved by converting F.O fired Boiler to Biomass fired Boiler

Avg. Furnace oil Reduction = 200 MT/M Average Cost of Furnace Oil = 34500 Rs./MT Yearly Cost savings (Fluctuate as per Price variation in the Fuel) = 183 Lacs/Year

32

33

34

Briquette Fired Boiler

Boiler Photographs before and after conversion

F.O. Fired Boiler Biomass Fired Boiler after conversion35

15, 15%

85, 85%

Percentage Renewable Energy Utilisation For Steam Generation

Furnace Oil Briquettes

36

FURNACE OIL -100%BIO MASS - 0%

Percentage Renewable Energy Uti-lization for Steam Genera-

tion Before KAIZEN Implementation

After KAIZEN Implementation

37

ENCON Project : 4

• Title :Optimization of Cooling water system• Loss no- 15• Background of the project :• To reduce power consumption for Cooling water pumping.• Observation made : 1. Cooling water high head and low head requirement areas were

identified. 2. It was observed that high head heat exchangers were starving due to

low pressure although the flow through pumps was satisfactory. 3. The low head areas were provided with positive isolation wherever

possible to reduce the unnecessary power consumption and other heat exchangers were tuned for appropriate diff temp for optimum flow.

• Technical and Financial Analysis :• Investment : 0.5 Lacs Implemented : Dec. 2012• 1st year cost Saving : Rs. 44.06 Lacs• Impact of implementation : Reduction in power consumption—5.04

LkWh per annum

38

Sample Calculation

Equipment Main process cooling tower pump no 1

DG cooling tower pump no 2

DG cooling tower pump no 3

Main process cooling tower pump no 2

Time 17.45 13.20 13.30 11.5KW 246.2 33.38 41.61 161.6KVA 275.08 37.76 45.97 191.3KVAR   17.65 19.12 102.3PF 0.895 0.883 0.904 0.843VOLTS 404.2 395.2 395.8 414.8AMPS 394 55.87 67.91 264FREQUENCY 50.02 49.77 49.84 49.65

Previous condition : Pumps running : PCT pump no.1 and DGCT pump no. 2 & 3

After optimisation : Pumps running : PCT pump no. 2 only

For saving we have considered the difference in KW of PCT pump no.1 and 2

KW saved = 246 – 161 = 85 KWH

Saving in Rs . = 85 x 24 x 30 x 5. = Rs. 3.67 lacs / Month = Rs. 44.06 Lacs / Annum

39

ENCON Project : 5

• Title :Optimization of chilled water system• Background of the project : To reduce power consumption for Chilled water

pumping.• Observation made : 1. Chilled water high head and low head requirement areas were identified. 2. It was observed that high head heat exchangers were starving due to low

pressure although the flow through pumps was satisfactory. 3. The expansion tank of the system was raised by 8 M of height to improve the suction and discharge head. 4. The low head pumps were put into operation to reduce the power consumption. 5. All heat exchangers were tuned for required chilled water flow.• Technical and Financial Analysis :• Investment : 0.5 Lacs Implemented : Dec. 2012• 1st year cost Saving : Rs. 26.99 Lacs• Impact of implementation : Reduction in power consumption---5.37LkWh per

annum.

40

Sample Calculation

Chilled water system Pump. no.1 pump no.2 Total pump no.3

         

KW 70.05 33.7 103.75 39.13

KVA 76.33 ,--   29.66

KVAR 29.19 ,--   25.15

PF 0.921 ,--   0.754 Lag

VOLTS 407.5 ,--   410.4

AMPS 107.6 ,--   54.72

FREQUENCY 50.09 ,--   49.38

Previous condition : Pumps running : pump no.1 and 2

After optimisation : Pump running : pump no. 3 only ( Pump replaced )

KW saved = 103 – 39

= 64 KWH

Saving in Rs . = 64 x 24 x 30 x 5.85

= Rs. 2.69 lacs / Month = Rs. 26.99 Lacs / Annum (for 300 Days/year)

41

ENCON Project : 6

• Title :Optimization of Hot oil system• Background of the project : To reduce power consumption for Hot oil pumping.• Observation made : 1. Hot oil high head and low head requirement areas were identified. 2. It was observed that high head heat exchangers were starving due to low

pressure although the flow through pumps was satisfactory. 3. Thermic fluid heater coil flow made fine tuning. 4. Before implementation one high head pump was running with full impeller,

after that two pumps impeller trimmed & reduced the head & increased the flow .

Technical and Financial Analysis :• Investment : 0.5 Lacs Implemented : Dec. 2012• 1st year cost Saving : Rs. 19.2 Lacs• Impact of implementation : Reduction in power consumption---3.1 Lac

kWh/annum

42

Sample Calculation

Equipment Primary santotherm

pump no 1

Primary santotherm pump no 3

Total

Primary santotherm pump

no 2

Time 12.45 12   13.40 HrsKVA 105.9 106   254.8KW 98.29 99.02 197.31 235

KVAR 39.3 39.8   56.44PF 0.927 0.928   0.922

VOLTS 409.5 410   408AMPS 149.9 150   353

FREQUENCY 49.85 49.75   49.79

Previously condition : Only pump no. 2 in lineAfter optimisation : Pump no. 1 & 3 in line.

NET KW SAVED = 235 – 198 = 35 KWH

SAVING IN Rs. = 35 x 24 x 30 x 6 = Rs. 1.6 Lacs / Month = Rs. 19.2 Lacs / Annum

43

• Utilization of High efficiency motor for blower.

• Blower old motor efficiency was lower i.e 88%.

• Before implementation blower motor taking 18.18 Kwh & with high efficiency motor 14.92 Kwh .

• Cost Saving : Rs. 1.69 Lacs• Impact of implementation : Reduction in power

consumption---0.3Lac kWh/annum

Efforts on Electrical Energy reduction

44

BALDOR HIGH EFFICIENCY MOTOR TRIAL AND COMPARISION WITH NORMAL MOTOR

ENERGY READINGS WITH THE HELP OF ENERGY MGR.(DATE-09/05/07,TIME- 17.15

TRIM SUCTION BLOWER NO - 01 TRIM SUCTION BLOWER NO - 03Make - BBL 3Ph I.M.     Make - Baldor FR - D160

Type -1LAJO87-

2 FR - 160L   Kw - 18.5 V - 415Hz - 50 Ins cl - B   Amps - 30 RPM - 2915M/C No - K4610292   ENCL - TEFC Hz - 50Duty - S1 V - 415 Delta   Ins. Cl - F SER. F - 1

Amps - 33 Eff. - 88%  Nima Eff - 93% IP - 55

Kw - 18.5 RPM - 2920   Rating - 45 C AMB - CONTP.F. - 0.83   Sr No - Z0605110010            Usable at 208 V

Valve position on - 3   Valve position on - 3MEASUR

E AVG R Y B AVG R Y B

V 402.3 RY-400.7 YB-401.8BR-

404.8 400.7 RY-401.8 YB-401.1RB-399.4,Ln-

231.7A 28.36 28.04 28.77 29.7 22.6 22.34 23.07 21.63, N - 1.83F 50.2       50.18      

Wh 18.18 6088 6131 6280 14.92 5002 5028 4904Vah 20.19 6772 6571 6877 16.03 5426 5416 5252

VARh 7879 2818 2281 2784 5542 1924 1897 1720PF 0.917 0.904 0.932 0.914 0.936 0.926 0.932 0.942

Sample Calculation

45

• Conversion of motor connections from delta to star.

• Methanol recovery cooling tower fan motor connections changed from delta to star reducing power by 0.16 kwh

Calculation: (1.78*24*30*12/100000)*6• Total Cost Saving : Rs. 1.00 Lacs• Impact of implementation : Reduction in power

consumption---0.15Lac kWh/annum

Efforts on Electrical Energy reduction

46

DELTA TO STAR CONVERSION

SR NO

NAME OF EQIPMENT

MOTOR RATING ENERGY PARAMETER

KW SAVING

KVAR SAVING

NET ENER

GY SAVING PER MONT

H

NET DEMAND SAVING

DELTA

          STAR          

VAH WH VARH PF AMP FREQ VAH WH VARH PF AMP FREQ

1

MEOH RECOVERY COOLING TOWER

FAN NO 1

11 KW, 1500 RPM

6758 4497 5029 0.667 9.49 49.68 4768 4339 1962 0.91 6.6 50.3 0.163.07

113 1.95

2

MEOH RECOVERY COOLING TOWER

FAN NO 2

11 KW, 1500 RPM

6976 4849 4971 0.72 9.48 50.05 5055 4633 2086 0.90 7.2 49.7 0.222.47

155 1.6

3

DMT SCRUBBER PUMP

3.7KW, 3000 RPM

1732 929.3 1426 0.537 2.42 49.88 983.8 828 420 0.85 1.6 50.0 0.100.95

72.72 0.756

4

REBOILER PUMP 7.5 KW, 3000RP

M 3984 2812 2715 0.71 5.652 49.51 3011 2782 1131 0.91 4.0 49.7 0.001.59

2.16 0.93

Sample Calculation

47

DELTA TO STAR CONVERSION

SR NO

NAME OF EQIPMENT MOTOR

RATING

ENERGY PARAMETER KW SAVING

KVAR SAVING

NET ENER

GY SAVING PER MONT

H

NET DEMAND SAVING

DELTA

         STA

R         

VAH WHVAR

HPF AMP

FREQ

VAH WHVAR

HPF AMP

FREQ

5

SEC EI PUMP 5.5 KW, 3000 RPM

3017 1191 2729 0.39 4.97 49.8 1255 965.3 742 0.77 1.07 50.1 0.23 1.8 162 1.792

6

MEOH FEED PUMP NO 2 3635 2598 2512 0.71 406 49.5 2551 2403 775 0.94 3.58 49.8 0.20 1.6 140.4 1.087

7

CASTING COOLING TOWER FAN

9.3KW, 1500R

PM 5634 4169 3808 0.73 7.08 49.7 4404 3934 1853 0.90 6.92 49.4 0.24 1.9 169.2 1.313

8

PACKING AHU 11KW, 1500 RPM 8461 6362 5555 0.75 11.51 50.2 6409 5716 2857 0.89 9.75 49.3 0.65 4.4 465.12 2.060

Sample Calculation

48

List of Awards

Sr. No.

Awards Title Organized by

Year Winner Category

1 5th State Level For Excellence in Energy Conservation and Management

MEDA 2008 Second Award in Other Industries.

2 National Energy Conservation Award-2009

BEE 2009 First Award in Plastic Sector.

3 CII – Energy Efficient Unit

CII 2010 Energy Efficient Unit

4 CII – National Award for Excellence in Energy Management

CII 2011 Excellent Energy Efficient Unit

5 6th State Level For Excellence in Energy Conservation and Management

MEDA 2012 Certificate

6 7th State Level For Excellence in Energy Conservation and Management

MEDA 2012 Certificate

49

THANKS