gas-condensed phase interactions
DESCRIPTION
Gas-Condensed Phase Interactions. Flame-Surface Heat Exchange. John E. Adams Department of Chemistry University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, MO 65211-7600. Context. Early deflagration models gasification + single reaction no explicit chemical mechanisms Refined models - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Gas-Condensed Phase Gas-Condensed Phase InteractionsInteractions
Flame-Surface Heat ExchangeFlame-Surface Heat Exchange
John E. AdamsDepartment of Chemistry
University of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbia, MO 65211-7600
ContextContext
Early deflagration modelsEarly deflagration models– gasification + single reactiongasification + single reaction– no explicit chemical mechanismsno explicit chemical mechanisms
Refined modelsRefined models– inclusion of one or more condensed-phase inclusion of one or more condensed-phase
reactionsreactions– detailed gas-phase combustion chemistrydetailed gas-phase combustion chemistry– gas-phase transportgas-phase transport– phenomenological treatment of the phenomenological treatment of the
dependence of burning rate on dependence of burning rate on TTss
Goal of Our WorkGoal of Our Work
Predict the burning ratePredict the burning rate(depends on surface temperature)(depends on surface temperature)– EvaporationEvaporation– Gas-phase combustionGas-phase combustion– Liquid surface heating by hot combustion productsLiquid surface heating by hot combustion products– Condensed-phase reactionsCondensed-phase reactions
Previous WorkPrevious Work
Energy transfer at a solid surfaceEnergy transfer at a solid surface– Many workers since the late 1960’s (polycrystalline Many workers since the late 1960’s (polycrystalline
surfaces, since 1930’s)surfaces, since 1930’s)
– Adsorbate coverage, collision geometry and Adsorbate coverage, collision geometry and TTss dependences (Zhao and Adams, 1985 and 1986)dependences (Zhao and Adams, 1985 and 1986)
Previous Work Previous Work (continued)(continued)
Gas-liquid scattering—early workGas-liquid scattering—early work– Sinha and Fenn (1975)Sinha and Fenn (1975)– Balooch, Siekhaus, and Olander (1986, 1988)Balooch, Siekhaus, and Olander (1986, 1988)
Nathanson groupNathanson group– Scattering of inert gases and smallScattering of inert gases and small
molecules (CHmolecules (CH44, NH, NH33, D, D22O, SFO, SF66) from) fromliquids and solutions having low vaporliquids and solutions having low vaporpressures (glycerol, squalane, conc.pressures (glycerol, squalane, conc.HH22SOSO44, perfluorinated polyethers,, perfluorinated polyethers,metals, alloys)metals, alloys)
– TOF spectra, in-plane scattering fluxTOF spectra, in-plane scattering fluxas a function of incident and observationas a function of incident and observationanglesangles
General FeaturesGeneral Features
Initial conditionsInitial conditions– Solid layersSolid layers
– Liquid “layers” (periodic Liquid “layers” (periodic boundary conditions)boundary conditions)
Gas-phase combustion Gas-phase combustion products impinge on products impinge on liquid surface, uniform liquid surface, uniform distribution of incident distribution of incident anglesangles Kinetic energy analysis Kinetic energy analysis of scattered speciesof scattered species
Input/OutputInput/Output
I:I: Potential energy functionsPotential energy functions– Analytical forms Analytical forms (Brenner group)(Brenner group)
– ““On-the-fly”On-the-fly”
I:I: Combustion product analysisCombustion product analysis (Thompson group)(Thompson group)
O:O: Energy transfer as a function of Energy transfer as a function of TTss (Rice; Miller (Rice; Miller
and Anderson)and Anderson)
– Angle-averaged energy loss to the surfaceAngle-averaged energy loss to the surface
– Identification of scattering componentsIdentification of scattering components Direct scatteringDirect scattering Trapping-desorptionTrapping-desorption Reactive scatteringReactive scattering
Initial EffortsInitial Efforts
Method development and calibrationMethod development and calibration– Simple Lennard-Jones fluidSimple Lennard-Jones fluid
test casetest case
Ar/InAr/In(6.4 and 92 kJ/mol,(6.4 and 92 kJ/mol,ii=55°; 436 K)=55°; 436 K)
experiments byexperiments byNathanson, Nathanson, et al.et al. At Atselected incidentselected incidentenergies and anglesenergies and angles
ExtensionsExtensions
Energy transfer to a solutionEnergy transfer to a solution– Ar/Bi:Ga (0.02% Bi), 313-673 KAr/Bi:Ga (0.02% Bi), 313-673 K– Segregation of the solute to the surface at low TSegregation of the solute to the surface at low T
Simple molecular caseSimple molecular case– Self-sustained frozen OSelf-sustained frozen O33 deflagration deflagration
Good models for the burning rate existGood models for the burning rate exist Relatively simple mechanism (3 combustion reactions), Relatively simple mechanism (3 combustion reactions),
reaction productsreaction products Possibility of reaction of incident species with the Possibility of reaction of incident species with the
surfacesurface