gaza©jordan_part ii

83
Gaza©Jordan Reshaping the border as a central space for encounters and interchange

Upload: tom-lanclus

Post on 02-Apr-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Masterthesis_part II: Reshaping of the border as a central place for encounters and interchange.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Gaza©JordanReshaping the border as a central space for encounters and interchange

Page 2: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 3: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Gaza©Jordan Reshaping the border as a central space for encounters and interchange.

Jasper Aerts Tom Lanclus

!esis submitted toobtain the degree of

Master of Engineering: Architecture

Promotor:

Lieven De Cauter Co-promotor:Guido Geenen

Local promotor:Ismae’l Sheikh Hassan

Academic Year 2013- 2014

Page 4: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 5: Gaza©Jordan_part II

KU Leuven Faculty of Engineering Science

Master’s thesis "le

Students: Jasper Aerts Tom Lanclus

Title: Gaza©Jordan: Reshaping the border as a central space for encounters and interchange.

Abstract:A lack of vision for Gaza camp can be met through the recognition of four spatial frames that serve as an underlying synthesis of the camp’s operational logics and moreover hold the potential to be deployed as a guidance for the camp’s future development. !is thesis seeks to explore the potentialities of this conceptual, though spatial framework by means of a physical translation into an architectural intervention that endeavors to constitute a tool for discussion between several actors and stakeholders involved. !rough the embracement of a collection of hiatuses within the growing stain of urban fabric that Gaza camp and its annexes constitute, a new space of centrality is introduced, establishing a counterweight that aims to respond to the camp’s altering needs. An enriched civil technical intervention of retaining walls emanates from the ambition to reshape the landscape at the camp’s border in order to activate the emptiness and to avoid a possible deprivation of this distinct armature of open spaces. Elaborated as an excessive dimensioned (infra)structure, it provides a permanent and durable carrier within which the camp can continue to thrive by means of temporal appropriations, allowing to anticipate the camp’s unknown prospective developments.

!esis submitted to obtain the degree of Master in Engineering: Architecture

Promotor: Lieven De CauterCo-promotor: Guido GeenenLocal promotor: Ismae’l Sheikh Hassan

2013-2014

Page 6: Gaza©Jordan_part II

© Copyright by KU Leuven

Zonder voorafgaande schri#elijke toestemming van zowel de promoter(en) als de auteur(s) is overnemen, kopiëren, gebruiken of realiseren van deze uitgave of gedeelten ervan verboden. Voor aanvragen tot of informatie i.v.m. het overnemen en/of gebruik en/of realisatie van gedeelten uit deze publicatie, wend u tot de KU Leuven, Faculteit Ingenieurswetenschappen - Kasteelpark Arenberg 1, B-3001 Heverlee (België). Telefoon +32-16-32 13 50 & Fax. +32-16-32 19 88.

Voorafgaande schri#elijke toestemming van de promoter(en) is eveneens vereist voor het aanwenden van de in dit afstudeerwerk beschreven (originele) methoden, producten, schakelingen en programma’s voor industrieel of commercieel nut en voor de inzending van deze publicatie ter deelname aan wetenschappelijke prijzen of wedstrijden.

© Copyright by KU Leuven

Without written permission of the supervisor(s) and the authors it is forbidden to reproduce or adapt in any form or by any means any part of this publication. Requests for obtaining the right to reproduce or utilize parts of this publication should be addressed to KU Leuven, Faculty of Engineering Science - Kasteelpark Arenberg 1, B-3001 Heverlee (Belgium). Telephone +32-16-32 13 50 & Fax. +32-16-32 19 88.

A written permission of the supervisor(s) is also required to use the methods, products, schematics and programs described in this work for industrial or commercial use, and for submitting this publication in scienti"c contests. All images used in this book are, unless otherwise credited, made or drawn by the authors.

Page 7: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 8: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 9: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Prologue

I. Space for encounters and interchange Plea for a counterweight

II. Border as a central space

Frames; revised and broadened Border as a sequence of spacesChambers of emptiness

III. Reshaping the border

Retaining walls: quoin versus stitch Overlap of atmospheresA variety of contrasting spaces Permanent temporarinessTangible border

Epilogue

Bibliography

10

12

20

40

80

14

22 28

30

42 60 627478

82

Page 10: Gaza©Jordan_part II

10Pr

olog

ue

PROLOGUE

!is thesis constitutes the conjunction of a profound reading, interpretation and understanding of the logics of the camp with the urge to both tackle a set of issues and exploit some potentialities that are latently present within the current appearance of the camp. During the Gaza©Workshop, the preliminary collective research has been supplemented, re"ned and subsequently distillated into four strategical spatial frames, which serve as a synopsis of today’s operation of Gaza camp and simultaneously constitute strong preconditions for future growth. !is sequel seeks to explore and exploit the signi"cances and potentialities of these rather conceptual frames by means of an architectural translation, which - besides providing a thoughtful solution to a range of matters – serves as a strategic project with a substantial impact on the camp’s future developments. !roughout three major chapters, this book attempts to clarify this spatial translation by addressing a set of essential questions.Starting o$ with the why, we endeavour to formulate a kind of problem statement; a reasoning why an intervention should be necessary, both programmatically as spatially, based on the experiences we had during our "eldwork and the subsequent readings and analysis that has been made. Next, an attempt is made to specify where an intervention would be at place. !rough revising and broadening the essence of the frames, we aim to re"ne and rede"ne their signi"cances, especially with regard to the driving forces behind each of them; the who so to speak. Subsequently, an emphasis is put on what we eventually want to do. !e proposed intervention serves as a programmatic and spatial solution to the problem statement, which is inextricably related with the how; the physical translation into architecture. !rough the application of the existing logics of the camp - and these of the site in particular - into the design, the site’s current conditions can be reinforced into strongly de"ned preconditions, imposing a set of ground rules that have to be met in order to direct the camp’s future growth. !e imposition of these new preconditions are achieved through the introduction of an almost civic technical intervention of a pair dilated retaining walls, elaborated as a merely overdimensioned, infrastructural reshaping of the landscape. Although "tting di$erently into the topography, they both constitute a sustainable carrier within which the temporal life of the camp can continue to thrive at its own pace.

However, it is important to note that this proposition is not intended to ‘be taken or le#’, but rather serves as a mediating plan, a platform for discussion addressed to several stakeholders involved in the management, policy and even inhabitation of the camp.

Proposed intervention within the spatial frames.

Page 11: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 12: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 13: Gaza©Jordan_part II

I

SPACE FOR ENCOUNTERS AND INTERCHANGE

Page 14: Gaza©Jordan_part II

14I

Spa

ce for

Enc

ount

ers

and

Inte

rcha

nge

PLEA FOR A COUNTERWEIGHT

Due to the camp’s prolonged existence in combination with the state of legal limbo its inhabitants are forced to live in and together with the numerous legal restrictions that come along with their lack of citizenship, an extreme process of densi"cation has occurred within the camp’s o%cial boundaries, leaving not a singular square meter un-appropriated, apart from the street network. !is replacement of the initial openness by a severe extent of fullness has transformed the camp into a homogenous maze of compression within which only little space has been safeguarded for encounters to take place. Nonetheless, a process of internal migration has been happening throughout the past two decades and is gaining momentum. It is due to the outward movement of those who are "nancially capable that Gaza camp’s footprint is dilating as we speak, increasingly occupying a greater area than the initial three-quarter square kilometre. Hence, dealing with Gaza camp cannot be con"ned to the refugees and the space they inhabit within the o%cial boundaries, but one has to take into account the bigger Palestinian urbanization. Since they retain their access to UNRWA’s health, education and relief services, residing in the overspill does not imply being independent from the camp and its facilities, but instead generates a problematic relationship with it. !e increased walking distance due to the eccentric location of these amenities fosters a car-based relation with the camp, charging the centre with an overload it cannot absorb. Since a possible adaption of the existing infrastructure of the camp’s centre does not respond to the issue of the centre’s increasing eccentric location, a better option might be to discharge the centre by implementing a complementary subcentre as a counterbalance to the existing one. A counterweight that acts as a place for interchange on a context-scale, an interface between the camp and its surroundings which attempts to keep the redundant tra%c out of the centre, reducing the latter to be mainly operational on a camp-scale. !is counterweight could also be deployed to serve on a community-scale; providing a place for encounters to take place; new activities that might reinforce the collective feelings, which characterize the Palestinian community in exile. !roughout time, the high density of the camp’s fabric has enhanced the emergence of strong relationships within the camp. !e phenomena of the urban overspill however re&ects a lifestyle that contrasts with the one from inside the camp’s tissue and represents a shi# in thinking from we to me [Campus In Camps, Common2], from thinking collectively as one community to a high extent of individualism, embodied by the enclosed typologies of ‘gated communities’ or walled-in villas.

Page 15: Gaza©Jordan_part II

15Plea for a C

ounterweight

Men gathering in the camp’s streets.

“People don’t think as a community anymore” - Mahmoud Riyad Kromp

Gated communities within the urban overspill.

Page 16: Gaza©Jordan_part II

16

Tekst

Boo

k 2

I

Grid unit 100m

Page 17: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Informatie bij foto, plan of schema. Mag verplaats wor-den, bijvoorbeeld onder een foto, maar deze breedte aan-houden.

Tekst

Subtitle

17

1968-1978

1978-1992

1992-2013

Walking distance: 5min

Page 18: Gaza©Jordan_part II

18

Tekst

Boo

k 2

I

TITEL (ALTIJD UITLIJNEN MET ONDERSTE REGEL)

Page 19: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Informatie bij foto, plan of schema. Mag verplaats wor-den, bijvoorbeeld onder een foto, maar deze breedte aan-houden.

Tekst

Subtitle

19

Page 20: Gaza©Jordan_part II

zwart wit foto over onderwerp hoofdstuk

Page 21: Gaza©Jordan_part II

I I

BORDER AS A CENTRAL SPACE

Page 22: Gaza©Jordan_part II

22Bor

der

as a

Cen

tral

Spa

ceII

FRAMES; REVISED AND BROADENED

!e set of strategic spatial frames that constituted the outcome of the Gaza©Workshop revealed their potentials through a multiplicity of conceptual projects. Although most of them were feasible projects within UNRWA’s possibilities, it has been proved that the capacity of the frames transcends these limits. !ey constitute strong preconditions for the camp’s further evolution and can develop each in their own way, according to their driving forces and location within the camp’s tissue. It is within the aim of this thesis to reveal these particular driving forces, to investigate how they can be deployed and to exploit their possibilities through an explorative design proposal.

!ree of the four spatial frames - ridge, main road and edge conditions - are characterized by a certain otherness - both in grain size as in function - and constitute "gures along or within which other things can happen in contrast to the uniform sameness of the imposed grid structure of the camp’s tissue; the fourth frame. !erefore, they play an important role in complementing the saturated residential grid and accommodating both formal and informal activities which are unimaginable inside the camp’s grid. By re"ning the meanings of these three frames, they serve as both a spatial and conceptual framework for the proposed intervention.

Spatial frames indicated on a scale model.

Page 23: Gaza©Jordan_part II

23Spatial Fram

es: Revised and B

roadened

Page 24: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Spaces within institutional control.

RIDGE

-acropolis- A citadel or forti"ed part of an ancient Greek city, typically one built on a hill. [Oxford Dictionary]

Along the ridge of the wadi, a linear "gure of spaces within institutional control de"nes the western border of the camp. Implemented on the camp’s highest axis, this armature of both authorities (UNRWA, DPA, Jordanian police) and amenities (education, health care, food distribution, etc.) constitute a citadel of relief and control, initially overlooking the camp’s fabric. As a result of the camp’s increased densi"cation, this concentration of predominantly enclosed spaces with a de"ned humanitarian either facilitating program, present the last open spaces within the o%cial camp borders.

It is the combination of the topographic conditions, the attractiveness due to the presence of the camp’s authorities, their power and "nances, and the slow north-south connector that makes the ridge a sustainable "gure, which constitutes a strong precondition for the camp’s future development whose existence will not easily be endangered and therefore is capable to develop itself.

24Bor

der

as a

Cen

tral

Spa

ceII

Page 25: Gaza©Jordan_part II

25Spatial Fram

es: Revised and B

roadened

MAIN ROAD

-artery -!e circulatory system that is vital for sustaining life. Its normal functioning is responsible for the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to all cells, as well as the removal of carbon dioxide and waste products. [Wikipedia]

!e low-lying main road is embedded in the central wadi, which deeply carves through the middle of the camp. Flanked by an abundance of shops, workshops and concrete buildings, it operates as the vital artery of the camp. !e road as a natural line of gravity literally functions as the main collector and divider, both for the supply of goods and the drain of waste products. It constitutes the interface between the camp and its surroundings, a distinct world of exchange, tra%c, commerce and labour.

!e vibrant main road is a vigorous armature which strings numerous private enterprises together. !e fact that the artery attracts many private stakeholders makes it the dominant economic and income generating body of the camp. !ereby, it de"nes an exceptionally strong precondition for the camp’s development. Its central position in the camp and strong economic driving force assures the further development of this spatial frame.

Spaces produced by private enterprises.

Page 26: Gaza©Jordan_part II

26II

Bor

der

as a

Cen

tral

Spa

ce

EDGE CONDITIONS

-archipelago-Something resembling an archipelago; especially: a group or scattering of similar things <an archipelago of small parks within the city> [Merriam-Webster]

Unlike the acropolis and artery, the camp’s edge conditions constitute a third frame that hasn’t been present right from the outset, but came into existence as the camp developed over time according to an ensemble of the two logics of growth. As a result, the fabric at the edges has loosened from the rigid grid structure and evolved into a morphology that constitutes a distinctive frame of otherness in contrast to the sameness of the grid. An assemblage of hiatuses, interstices of a di$erent grain size, trapped in-between the bulk of the developing fabric compose an armature of deviant bodies that create a belt of openness and form a precious and generous chain of decompression zones along the camp’s o%cial border. Due to their location, they act as disturbing chunks of open land that collect but simultaneously impede the movement perpendicular to the border. It are these distortions that de"ne the border as a sequence of spaces, which collect the radial movements from in- to outside the camp and the other way around. Nonetheless, this archipelago of deviations lacks a "nancial, economical or institutional driving force that assures the permanency of this frame, as is the case for the artery and acropolis. As being everybody’s and nobody’s at the same time, neither interest nor responsibility is being borne towards these spaces, which results in their neglect. Although they contain a high extent of contamination, albeit through solid

waste or sewage, their openness constitutes a latent asset for the camp that is likely to be jeopardized by means of urbanization, since most of these lacunas are private property of Jordanian owners. In order to prevent the saturation - and further contamination - of these spaces, and thus the loss of its openness and otherness, these chambers need to be protected, safeguarded and therefore activated. Due to their location, these enclosures – by means of a wall either built fabric – de"ne the border as a collection of spaces that hold the potential to adjust the physical appearance of the camp to the shi#ing attitude of its dwellers with regard to the landscape that is at stake at the moment. For many years an aversive stance has been adopted by the refugees towards the spaces outside the border and the surrounding landscape in general. However, the emergence of the overspill represents an alteration of the environment, which re&ects a sort of a%liation with the land by means of private appropriation and emphasizes the voids as exterior chambers in-between the camp and its overspill. !erefore, their central location within the bigger Palestinian urbanization makes these ‘spaces of otherness’ – in terms of morphology - suitable as ‘spaces for otherness’; giving room for activities and programs that are impossible and unimaginable inside the camp. At the same time, they can be used to establish a relationship between the camp and its surroundings.

Page 27: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Tekst

27Spatial Fram

es: Revised and B

roadened

Highly contaminated wadi in the north-east.

Neglected void in the east.

Page 28: Gaza©Jordan_part II

28Bor

der

as a

Cen

tral

Spa

ceII

It is within this frame of the varying though similar edge conditions that we feel the urge for an intervention, since these spaces allow mediation between the intra and extra muros, between the o%cial camp and both its overspill and the surroundings landscape. However, due to the lack of interest in and awareness of these spaces, a catalyst is needed in order to activate these neglected backsides by means of a collective interest and avoid the threat of future private appropriation. !e sequence of open spaces at the camp’s eastern border constitute an anomaly in the continuation of both its fabric as well as the linearity of the main road; a deviation that gives room for the implementation of a new space of centrality, a counterweight to the existing eccentric centre of the camp. Two empty plots covering both sides of the main road hold the potential to become a counter "gure capable to discharge the camp both programmatically and with regard to its infrastructure. Moreover, it is exactly the presence of this economical artery of the camp that can potentially be deployed as the necessary catalyst through which a bigger belt of emptiness along the border can be activated.

Dissected by this line of gravity, the voids at the camp’s entrance together with the main road could constitute a new hub at the intersection of the two frames, a versatile interface between many things: the camp’s part A and B, the camp and its overspill and even between the camp and its host country. Due to its location, the site embodies a place of ambiguities and contrasts. Characterized by multiple faces and a variety of boundary conditions, this sequence of spaces constitutes an overlap of di$erent spheres. It serves as a morphological interface between the low-rise high-density fabric of the camp and the thinly spread tissue that determines the overspill. Besides, the site bridges the contrast between the fast, commercial and masculine characteristics of the downcamp along the main road and the so#, residential and rather feminine sphere on the hilltops.

It is the coexistence of these kinds of contrasts that contribute to the assets of the site and constitute a certain tension "eld we would like to exploit.

BORDER AS A SEQUENCE OF SPACES

Sequence of open spaces at the camp’s eastern border.

Grid unit 100m

Page 29: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 30: Gaza©Jordan_part II

30II

Bor

der

as a

Cen

tral

Spa

ce

While these vulnerable deviant bodies on the eastern edge of the camp have a similar neglect in common, they signi"cantly di$er in grain size and boundary conditions; plot demarcations, vegetation, built fabric and retaining walls. Yet, topography still remains the main determinant in the emergence, evolution and current appearance of these voids. !ey are located at the con&uence of the two wadis, each of which have strongly in&uenced the urban morphology and the empty spaces they surround.

!is in mind, we can clearly distinguish the two chambers of emptiness which are located on either side of the main road. !e northern void is trapped in-between the bifurcation of the two wadis and the camp’s fabric. It bridges the height di$erence between the residential fabric of the inner camp and the edges of the lower wadis, resulting in a plane inclined in two directions. Situated at the margin of the o%cial camp, this chamber morpholigically constitutes the corner of the northern residential hilltop.

!e southern void on the other hand, constitutes a &ank of the wadi in which the main road is embedded. Trapped in-between the residential fabric of the southern hilltop, which consists of the camp’s part B and its natural continuation towards the east, this void bridges a height di$erence of approximately 30 meters. Despite its "rm inclination, the openness is frequently used by youngsters as a shortcut to move from the main road to the residences on the hilltops or the other way around.

CHAMBERS OF EMPTINESS

Site of intervention; current situation.

Grid unit 100m

Page 31: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 32: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 33: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 34: Gaza©Jordan_part II

34II

Bor

der

as a

Cen

tral

Spa

ce

Page 35: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Informatie bij foto, plan of schema. Mag verplaats wor-den, bijvoorbeeld onder een foto, maar deze breedte aan-houden.

Normale tekst1 kolomBuiten uitgelijnd 35

Cham

bers of EmptinessView from southern to northern void.

View over southern void.

Page 36: Gaza©Jordan_part II

36Bor

der

as a

Cen

tral

Spa

ce

Side entrance southern void.

II

Informal path southern void.

Page 37: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Normale tekst1 kolomBuiten uitgelijnd 37

Cham

bers of Emptiness

Road along southern void.

View from top of southern void.

Page 38: Gaza©Jordan_part II

38Bor

der

as a

Cen

tral

Spa

ce

View on northern void from top of southern void.

II

Northern void along the camp’s border.

Page 39: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Normale tekst1 kolomBuiten uitgelijnd 39

Cham

bers of Emptiness

Elevated road along the camp’s border, view on northern void.

Northern void from main road.

Page 40: Gaza©Jordan_part II

40II

Bor

der

as a

Cen

tral

Spa

ce

Approaching the camp through the main road.

Empty voids on both sides of the road main at the camp’s entrance.

Page 41: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Informatie bij foto, plan of schema. Mag verplaats wor-den, bijvoorbeeld onder een foto, maar deze breedte aan-houden.

Normale tekst1 kolomBuiten uitgelijnd

Subtitle

41

Page 42: Gaza©Jordan_part II

zwart wit foto over onderwerp hoofdstuk

Page 43: Gaza©Jordan_part II

I I I

RESHAPING THE BORDER

Page 44: Gaza©Jordan_part II

44II

IRes

hapi

ng t

he B

orde

r

RETAINING WALLS: QUOIN VERSUS STITCH

In order to structure the unstructured sequence of emptiness, a basic principle of cut and add is applied. A merely civic technical intervention of adding two retaining walls allows a reshaping of the landscape through which the set of chambers will be reinforced, re"ned and de"ned as spaces that vary greatly with regard to their atmosphere, extent of exposure, usage, etc. !e appearance of this pair of minimalistic - in terms of providing the uttermost essential (infra)structure - though very robust interventions results from the logics imposed by the underlying landscape. It is by re-scaping the land that we can endow a certain sustainability to this site, since landscape possesses a high extent of perpetuity. It is the landscape and its topography that serves as the major determinant for all what occurs on top of it, as is also the case at our site of focus. !e dissimilarity of the topographic conditions within both voids gives rise to a di$erent morphological approach of the two retaining walls; the quoin versus the stitch, respectively as the northern and southern wall.

Due to the bidirectional inclination of the northern void, the necessity of a twofold retaining structure results in the appearance of a quoin; a cornerstone that acts as a hook pro"le for the camp’s part A, connecting the two membranes constituted by the main road and the northern wadi, which keep the fabric within its o%cial boundaries. It is the northward oriented branch of this quoin that o$ers the opportunity to re-establish the connection between the main road and the northern wadi that has become silted due to urbanization activities along the main road at the junction of the bifurcation.

In contrast to the retaining function of the northern wall, both with regard to topography as well as built fabric, the southern one merely retains the &ank, while it simultaneously acts as a stitch. Implemented along the topographic lines of the &ank, this retaining wall establishes a new connection between the camp and its immediate overspill and thereby fosters the process of ‘internal migration’ in southeastward direction, whereas the quoin emphasizes the enclosed condition of part A.

Quoin (north) versus stitch (south).

Grid unit 100m

Page 45: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 46: Gaza©Jordan_part II

0 5 10 25Roof plan

Page 47: Gaza©Jordan_part II

0 5 10 25

Page 48: Gaza©Jordan_part II

0 5 10 25Level +0

Page 49: Gaza©Jordan_part II

0 5 10 25

Page 50: Gaza©Jordan_part II

0 5 10 25Level +1

Page 51: Gaza©Jordan_part II

0 5 10 25

Page 52: Gaza©Jordan_part II

0 5 10 25Level +2

Page 53: Gaza©Jordan_part II

0 5 10 25

Page 54: Gaza©Jordan_part II

0 5 10 25Level +3

Page 55: Gaza©Jordan_part II

0 5 10 25

Page 56: Gaza©Jordan_part II

!e Quoin

Page 57: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 58: Gaza©Jordan_part II

!e Stitch

Page 59: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 60: Gaza©Jordan_part II

60I

OVERLAP OF ATMOSPHERES

Despite the fact that both walls operate di$erently in plan, they exhibit a high extent of a%nity in section. !e supplementation by two retaining walls to the above mentioned existing demarcations of the site reinforces the existing spatial conditions of these spaces into a set of clearly demarcated chambers, with each their own characteristics; an exposed urban plaza, an intimate multi-leveled garden and a terraced grove. Due to the topographic conditions, it is within the thickness of the retaining walls where these contrasting atmospheres overlap resulting into several interesting typologies that can serve as a carrier for new innovative programs and activities, providing a &exible platform that allows to respond to the camp’s varying needs throughout the course of time. !e retaining walls moreover constitute the thresholds that have to be bridged in order to move from one chamber into another. !ese shortcuts are however concentrated within the armpits of each buckled retaining wall, serving as a collecting and dividing mechanism for people, goods, water, etc. Due to this concentration, both branches of both retaining walls are elaborated minimalisticly according to the uttermost necessary infrastructure, allowing a maximum &exibility.

Res

hapi

ng t

he B

orde

rII

I

Section stitch - urban plaza - quoin

Page 61: Gaza©Jordan_part II

61O

verlap of Atm

ospheres

Page 62: Gaza©Jordan_part II

62Res

hapi

ng t

he B

orde

rII

I

A VARIETY OF CONTRASTING SPACES

Section quoin - intimate garden

!e quoin can be considered as a central hinge between a multipliticity of urban structures; the camp’s tissue versus the overspill, the wadi versus the main road, openness of the chambres versus fullness of the dense fabric. !is variety of adjacent conditions results in diverse types of spaces, stacked within the retaining structure. Each of them activates its contiguous outdoor space - the urban plaza, the intimate garden, the northern green wadi - in its own way. !ey don’t necessarily attempt to be democratic or totally accessible for everyone, at every moment. In contrast, the quoin fosters communal events which have the possibility to be limited to a certain group, age or gender.

Page 63: Gaza©Jordan_part II

A Variety of C

ontrasting Spaces

63

!e mutually perpendicularly oriented branches of these bidirectional retaining walls are connected by a corner piece, which acts as an outdoor, functional tube that provides all vertical circulation within the quoin. !e branch facing the main road and framing the urban plaza holds the opportunity to set a new standard with regard to future verticalisation along the main road through the stacking of varying typologies, which are capable to absorb a variety of possible "ll-in scenarios: a vocational school, a wedding hall, a camp restaurant, classrooms, etc. In contrast, the northward oriented branch makes the transition from a building into a landscape, through the integration of an auditorium within the existing topography of the site. Moreover, this wing initiates the alley that re-establishes the silted connection between the wadi and the main road; a linear empty space trapped in-between the obtained height di$erences. Here, the gradient between the intimate camp’s tissue and the exposed main road or the green wadi could be manipulated by means of shi#ing height di$erences, resulting in a sequence of disparate, multi-levelled outdoor spaces, which can simultaneously operate separately. In this particular proposal, the intimate garden consists of a paved terrace as a continuous extension of the grand hall, supplemented by a lower, intimate green patio enclosed by two galleries that can serve as storage rooms; and a more exposed playground next to the wadi.

Page 64: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Subtitle

Page 65: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Boo

k 2

Quoin level +0, southern branch [vocational course].

Page 66: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Tekst

TITEL (ALTIJD UITLIJNEN MET ONDERSTE REGEL)

Page 67: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Informatie bij foto, plan of schema. Mag verplaats wor-den, bijvoorbeeld onder een foto, maar deze breedte aan-houden.

Normale tekst1 kolomBuiten uitgelijnd

Alley connecting main road with wadi, passing the auditorium, the intimate garden and the playground.

Page 68: Gaza©Jordan_part II

68II

IRes

hapi

ng t

he B

orde

r

!e stitch constitutes the preferred so# connection between the camp and its overspill and at the same time exploits the interesting overlap between the southern residential hilltop and the arterial main road. !is results in an attractive commercial place, which can act as a counterweight to the camp’s eccentric centre and its adjacent souq. Goods, food and animals can be supplied from the bigger context of Jerash governorate through the artery, while women can easily reach the stitch due to its integration in the camp’s residential network. !e elongated shape of the retaining wall within the undulating landscape produces two di$erent typologies, adapted to its surrounding conditions. !e western branch of the stitch anticipates the overlap between the artery and the residential tissue, constituting a sequence of commercial units within two di$erent atmospheres. Both levels could also function together by providing internal shortcuts - by means of stairs or hoists - to combine the arterial production, labour and storage with selling activities on the upper &oor. !e eastern branch of the retaining wall on the other hand, is more deeply carved into the landscape. !is part of the stitch o$ers place for cool storage rooms underground and an open concrete structure on top. Right in between both branches, the armpit of the stitch operates as a collector and divider for either people, goods, water and waste products. !erefore, its surrounding outdoor spaces collect rainwater, each on its own way according to the logics of its shape, and lead it to the central armpit where it scan be stored and deployed as a supplementation to the water provision used for several activities within the stitch.

Section terraced grove - stitch - urban plaza

Page 69: Gaza©Jordan_part II

69A Variety of C

ontrasting Spaces

In contrast to the de"ned, intimate garden, the exposed urban plaza can be considered as an unde"ned plain which can be &ooded by an endless amount of activities, whether related to its adjacent buildings or as an entity on its own. It constitutes a decompression zone which has the possibility to catch the ‘fast’ of the main road and absorb cars, trucks and goods from the artery. Besides it can host communal activities related to the quoin or a serve as a commercial spur of the stitch. Since it is - in its untouched bare form - mostly exposed to the sun, the urban plaza will trans"gure throughout the day and hence will operate time-related. !e chilly morning will attract vendors and suppliers, the hot a#ernoon pushes each and everyone to the square’s shaded margins while its a#erglow magnetizes communal activities a#er dusk.

!e unstructured southernmost void &anks this belt of openness along the camp’s eastern border. Retained by the elongated stitch and in stark contrast with the emptiness of the urban plaza, the &ank presents itself as a Palestinian greenscape in-between the camp’s southern tissue. A terraced grove, connected with the stitch provides a collection of shaded spaces of stillness and slow passageways, elevated above the fuss of the plaza. !e terraced slope, elaborated with a network of channels o$ers the opportunity to collect an enormous amount of stormwater, leading it to the water reservoir provided within the armpit of the stitch.

Page 70: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 71: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Stitch level +0, western branch [shops along urban plaza].

Page 72: Gaza©Jordan_part II
Page 73: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Stitch level +1, eastern branch [open bazaar].

Page 74: Gaza©Jordan_part II

74II

IRes

hapi

ng t

he B

orde

r

!e shape of the adapted landscape can be considered as a result of distilling and exploiting the logics of which it consists, both site-speci"c and with regard to the existing spatial frames. By deploying these logics, the derived built form of the civil technical intervention can acquire a high degree of durability. !e excessively designed concrete retaining structures - made by on-site recuperated granulates - form part and parcel of the landscape and provide space for temporal "ll-in activities which can change through time. It is a landscape of open, &exible structures in which the camp can develop at its own pace and with its own means. It constitutes a platform for changeable programs that can activate its surrounding openness. Hereby, the intervention anticipates the unknown future of the camp and its growing overspill.

To intervene within the existing landscape, there has been appealed to local techniques, materials and know-how to deal with the camp’s speci"c habitats, culture and climate. Inground retaining structures ensure cool spaces for storage and workshops along the main road, while upper &oors consist of open structures which can be covered by local and temporal materials, depending on the use and available resources. !is allows a continuation of the camp’s roofscape, hence integrating the retaining walls in the landscape as well as in the camp’s fabric.

PERMANENTTEMPORARINESS

Page 75: Gaza©Jordan_part II

75

Flexible ground "oor of quoin.

Permanent Tem

porariness

Applying local agriculture techniques.

Page 76: Gaza©Jordan_part II

4,75m W x 12m D x 3,5m H 7 unitsopen gallerychangeable roo!ngadditional storeys possible

retaining structure24m W x 12m D x 3,5m Hchangeable roo!ngadditional storeys possible

retaining structure24m W x 12m D x 3,5m Hunderground storage roomwith freight elevator connected to upper storey(s)

retaining structure4,75m W x 12m D x 3,5m H 7 units

retaining structure24m W x 14m D x 7,3m H additional internal "oor possible by means of concrete brackets

retaining structure10m W x 20m D x 7,3-4m H auditorium

[inverted beams]4,75m W x 12m D x 3,4m H5 units open gallerychangeable roo!ngadditional storeys possible

24m W x 14m D x 4,75m H open hall

Page 77: Gaza©Jordan_part II

4,75m W x 12m D x 3,5m H 7 unitsopen gallerychangeable roo!ngadditional storeys possible

retaining structure24m W x 12m D x 3,5m Hchangeable roo!ngadditional storeys possible

retaining structure24m W x 12m D x 3,5m Hunderground storage roomwith freight elevator connected to upper storey(s)

retaining structure4,75m W x 12m D x 3,5m H 7 units

retaining structure24m W x 14m D x 7,3m H additional internal "oor possible by means of concrete brackets

retaining structure10m W x 20m D x 7,3-4m H auditorium

[inverted beams]4,75m W x 12m D x 3,4m H5 units open gallerychangeable roo!ngadditional storeys possible

24m W x 14m D x 4,75m H open hall

Page 78: Gaza©Jordan_part II

78Boo

k 2

I

Page 79: Gaza©Jordan_part II

79Tangible B

order

!rough the reinforcement of the border as sequence of open spaces, an accessory layer with regard to the refugees’ identity can be added to the project. !e safeguarding of the emptiness contrasts with the fullness of the fabric within the border and hence emphasizes the camp’s boundary, through which importance can be given to the armature of open spaces that de"ne the act of crossing the border, not merely as a linear element, but rather as a tangible space; a special moment one has to traverse before entering the o%cial camp. !e experience of crossing these open spaces stresses the importance of the camp as the symbolic and legal representation of the ‘Palestinianess’, since it constitutes the closest connection between the refugee and his pre-exilic origin.[Woroniecka, 2013]

!erefore, these spaces themselves serve as a collection of places where the physical appearance of the initial camp is manifested and thus serve as the mirror of the camp [Campus In Camps, Common1]; places where the collective feelings of this community in exile can be fostered, which are gradually being jeopardized by the growing individualism emerging in the overspill. !rough the activation of these places as a new space of centrality for the bigger Palestinian urbanization, the relation between the camp and its overspill can be advanced and collective feelings can be reinforced or re-established. Moreover, it o$ers the opportunity to improve the relation with the surrounding landscape and spatially integrate the concrete stain that the camp constitutes within its surroundings; "tting the alien without derogating the initial camp as a site of commemoration.

TANGIBLE BORDER

Page 80: Gaza©Jordan_part II

EPILOGUE

Page 81: Gaza©Jordan_part II

Due to its coordinates, the site of intervention "nds itself on the hinge between several stakeholders; various actors involved though indi$erent with regard to the site’s current disregard and future prospects. First of all, UNRWA adapts a reticent stance towards the site of focus, adducing their impotence to intervene spatially due to its location outside the o%cial perimeter of the camp that demarcates their "eld of action. In the meantime, the augmenting refugee population and its dilating spatial impact are converting this neglected backside into the point of gravity of the bigger Palestinian urbanisation; a land"ll in the making amidst a greater territory inhabited by a population to which UNRWA provides assistance and relief in order to foster their human development. Nevertheless, the recent accomplishment of the high school for boys stands proof for the fact that UNRWA does have the capability to intervene outside their ‘legal’ zone, albeit by means of a collaboration with another party. !e site’s central location within the spreading ex-Gazan community makes the voids physically part of what is spatially considered as camp. It therefore causes a non-interest on account of the municipality of Jerash, complementary to the general exclusion of Palestinian camps from Jordanian urban development plans and policies.[Al-Husseini, 2012] In contrast however, it are precisely the site’s coordinates that potentially o$er the opportunity to attract (external) private investors. !e voids’ dual connection with the economical artery of the main road constitutes an asset, waiting to be exploited. It is the deployment of this commercially and infrastructurally advantageous location through which the emptiness can be activated in a feasible way. By using the arterial characteristics of the main road as the indispensable catalyst to upgrade these neglected backsides, one can prevent their subjection to the greedy spatial impact of the camp’s dilating growth. Instead, the deviations can be safeguarded as generous open spaces for interchanges and encounters to take place; introducing a complementary pole of attraction within the magnet which the camp constitutes. Notwithstanding the urge for this new counterweight, we feel that we are not in the position to be imposing a speci"c, de"ned program, as we consider this as something that has to grow bottom-up or in a participatory way. What we think we can do to achieve our ambitions and visions for Gaza camp, is to design the uttermost essential (infra)structure that has the necessary spatial impact on its immediate surroundings and serves as a &exible carrier that that can be appropriated by the camp’s community, UNRWA, DPA, private enterprises, NGO’s, etc. !e spatial translation of this idea is however done with a set of scenarios in our mind as a design tool, which are based on the experiences we had during our "eldwork and the analysis we’ve conducted and that seek to tackle a number of issues that call for a solution. However, what it comes down to is to make an attempt for gathering a mixture of di$erent actors and stakeholders around the table for discussion and raise the awareness of the latent possibilities of the site and the frames in general, what is exactly the aim of this thesis.

Page 82: Gaza©Jordan_part II

82Bib

liogr

aphy

WORONIECKA, Dorota, “Identity and Place in Extended Exile: !e Case of a Palestinian Refugee City-Camp”, in: Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai - Socio-logia, issue 1, 2013, p. 21-37. AL HUSSEINI, Jalal, !e Evolution of the Palestinian Refugee Camps in Jor-dan. Between Logics of Exclusion and Integration, Cities, Urban Practices and Nation Building in Jordan, Beirut, Presses de l’Ifpo, 2012, p. 181-204.

CAMPUS IN CAMPS, Common2, (Collective Dictionary), published on web-site: http://www. campusincamps.ps/en/projects/common-1/, last consulted on 30th May 2014.

CAMPUS IN CAMPS, Common1, (Collective Dictionary), published on web-site: http://www. campusincamps.ps/en/projects/common-1/, last consulted on 30th May 2014.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Page 83: Gaza©Jordan_part II