general article neuropeptides: the slower neurotransmitters
TRANSCRIPT
GENERAL ARTICLE
Neuropeptides: The Slower Neurotransmitters∗
Umer Saleem Bhat and Kavita Babu
Umer Saleem Bhat received
his MSc in Biotechnology
from the University of
Kashmir and is currently a
graduate student at IISER
Mohali. Umer is studying the
function of neuropeptides in
C. elegans for his PhD thesis
research.
Kavita Babu holds a PhD in
developmental biology from
The National University of
Singapore. She has worked
on C. elegans at
Massachusetts General
Hospital for her postdoctoral
research. Kavita headed her
lab at IISER Mohali for close
to eight years before moving
to the Centre for
Neuroscience, IISc in 2019.
Her lab is largely interested
in understanding the
molecular mechanisms of
synaptic function.
Neuropeptides, as the name suggests, are small peptides re-
leased by neurons that allow them to communicate with each
other. These small peptides modulate the activity of neurons,
in turn, allowing the modulation of multiple behaviors. Here,
we describe how neuropeptides are made and go on to dis-
cuss how these peptides function in an organism. We also
highlight the specific roles of neuropeptides in modulating the
locomotory behavior of the free-living nematode, Caenorhab-
ditis elegans.
Introduction
Cell signaling refers to the process by which cells communicate
with each other and their environment to modulate different cel-
lular functions. Cells in our body secrete a plethora of molecules
known as the signaling molecules. These molecules are required
for the transduction of information from one cell to another. Neu-
ropeptides are small peptides that are secreted by neurons, al-
lowing them to ‘talk’ to each other. These peptides bind to the
surface receptors on the postsynaptic neurons or extra synapti-
cally (in an effector cell not in physical contact with the pep-
tide producing neuron) and allow for neuronal activation or in-
activation. Different populations of our brain cells release mul-
tiple sets of these peptides. Neuropeptides have been found to
be involved in regulating a wide range of functions, including
learning and memory, locomotion, food intake, social behavior,
reproduction, metabolism, reward behavior, analgesia, etc. Fur-
ther, defective neuropeptide signaling is related to various neu-
rological diseases like autism, Alzheimer’s disease, and epilepsy.
∗Vol.25, No.12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-020-1094-8
RESONANCE | December 2020 1741
GENERAL ARTICLE
However, the mechanism of how these peptides function is stillKeywords
Neuropeptides, receptors, and C.
elegans.
largely unknown. In this short review, we first discuss neuropep-
tide biology in general and then provide a mechanistic insight into
neuropeptide control of locomotion behavior of the small free-
living nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans, under normal well-fed
or starvation-induced stress conditions. The C. elegans nervous
system releases more than a hundred neuropeptides, some of which
have mammalian counterparts. More importantly, the mechanism
of function of neuropeptides is conserved, from worms to verte-
brates, including Homo sapiens.
Neuropeptide Processing: From Precursor to Functional Ma-
turity
FunctionallyFunctionally mature
neuropeptides are
derived from large
precursor molecules
after a series of
processing and
modification steps. A
single neuropeptide or
multiple distinct
neuropeptides can be
derived from a single
precursor molecule.
mature neuropeptides are derived from large precur-
sor molecules after a series of processing and modification steps.
A single neuropeptide or multiple distinct neuropeptides can be
derived from a single precursor molecule. However, in mammals,
a single precursor molecule can be subjected to differential cleav-
age to yield a different set of neuropeptides. These neuropeptide
precursors are synthesized on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in-
side the soma of the neuron and are called pre-propeptides. The
peptide signal sequence that indicates to the cell that the protein
must be secreted is first cleaved inside the ER yielding a propep-
tide. The propeptide then traverses the Golgi apparatus where it
is packaged into vesicles. The final processing and modification
of the propeptide to yield the mature neuropeptide takes place in-
side the vesicle (illustrated in Figure 1). The series of events and
enzymes involved in processing and modification of the propep-
tide to yield a mature neuropeptide are shown in Figure 2. The
processing of the propeptide begins with the action of an endopro-
teolytic kex2/subtilisin-like proprotein convertase. The endopro-
teolytic cleavage generally takes place at the C-terminal dibasic
residues like Lys-Arg, Arg-Arg, Lys-Lys, and Arg-Lys, flanking
the peptide sequence. Reports have confirmed that cleavage could
also happen at the monobasic and tribasic residues in specific sce-
narios.
1742 RESONANCE | December 2020
GENERAL ARTICLE
Figure 1. Neuropeptide
biosynthesis, processing,
and storage pathway. Neu-
ropeptide precursors, after
being transcribed, are syn-
thesized as pre-propeptides
on the ribosomes at the
rough endoplasmic reticu-
lum (1) Propeptides along
with the processing en-
zymes from the ER traverse
to the Golgi apparatus (2)
here, the processing of
neuropeptides starts in the
vesicles after which they are
transported along the axon
(3) to the axon terminals
with the help of motor pro-
teins (green lines and (4)).
Neuropeptides are stored
inside large dense-core
vesicles (5) and after being
released they diffuse away
to act on cells that could be
at a distance from the cell
releasing the neuropeptide
(6). Source: Modified from
Basic Neurochemistry, 6th
ed, 1999. Lippincott-Raven.
C.elegans as the model organism for the study of molecular mech-
anisms in the nervous system is ideal as it has just 300 well-
characterized neurons, compared to approximately 86 billion neu-
rons in the human brain. It is also easy to do genetic manipula-
tions to study the effect of mutations on these worms. C. elegans
express four types of propeptide convertases including KPC-1,
EGL-3/KPC-2, AEX-5/ KPC-3, and BLI-4/KPC-4. These en-
zymes have different targets and preferences depending upon their
catalytic domains. The cleavage of propeptides by the action of
propeptide convertase is followed by the removal of the basic
residues from the C-terminus of the intermediate cleaved prod-
ucts. The enzyme that is responsible for the removal of basic
residues is known as carboxypeptidase E (CPE).
Even after the endoproteolytic and exoproteolytic cleavage of the
precursor molecules, they are biologically inactive and suscepti-
ble to degradation. For the peptide to be biologically active, mod-
ifications at the C-terminus and, in some cases, the N-terminus
must take place. ‘Amidation’ is the most common modification of
inactive neuropeptides based on the presence of a glycine residue
at the C-terminus, which donates an amide group during this pro-
cess. The process of amidation is catalyzed by a bifunctional
enzyme known as peptidylglycine α-amidating monooxygenase
(PAM). The structural analysis of PAM has revealed two domains,
which sequentially catalyze the two-step process of amidation,
respectively. The first reaction involves the conversion of pep-
RESONANCE | December 2020 1743
GENERAL ARTICLE
Figure 2. Processing of
pre-propeptide to yield the
mature neuropeptide. Pre-
cursor molecules having sig-
nal peptides are first sub-
jected to the action of signal
peptidase, which cleaves the
signal peptide. The propep-
tide thus formed is acted
upon by the enzyme pro-
tein convertase at mono/di-
basic residues yielding small
peptide sequences. Basic
residues are removed from
these peptide sequences by
carboxypeptidase E. Finally,
post-translational modifica-
tions like amidation occur
at the C-terminal glycine
residue yielding a mature
neuropeptide. Source: Mod-
ified from C Li and K Kim,
Neuropeptides, WormBook,
1–36, 2008.
tidylglycine into peptidyl α-hydroxyglycine, and is catalyzed by
the peptidylglycine α-hydroxylating monooxygenase (PHM) do-
main of PAM. The intermediate product of the first reaction serves
as the substrate for the second reaction, and is acted upon by
peptidyl-α-hydroxyglycine α-amidating lyase (PAL), yielding the
final product in the form of an amidated peptide and glyoxylate
as a by-product (illustrated in Figure 3).
Neuropeptide Release
AsThe processing of
neuropeptides begins in
the secretory vesicles
from the trans-Golgi
network. The bioactive
neuropeptides are then
stored in the same
vesicles known as large
dense-core vesicles.
discussed in the previous section, the processing of neuropep-
tides begins in the secretory vesicles from the trans-Golgi net-
work. The bioactive neuropeptides are then stored in the same
vesicles known as large dense-core vesicles, in contrast to the
small clear-core vesicles that store conventional small neurotrans-
mitters. Unlike small clear-core vesicles that are localized at the
presynaptic specialization, the large dense-core vesicle contain-
1744 RESONANCE | December 2020
GENERAL ARTICLE
Figure 3. Sequential re-
action of bifunctional PAM
catalyzed by PHM and PAL.
Source: Modified from Chu-
fan, et al., 1993.
ing neuropeptides are scattered at the nerve terminus (illustrated
in Figure 1). A variety of neurons have been found to show the
vesicular release of neuropeptides from the cell body and den-
drites as well. Neurotransmitters are secreted in response to the
neural activation, i.e., the arrival of a nerve impulse that causes
an increase in the intracellular levels of calcium due to influx of
calcium ions through the voltage-gated calcium (Ca+2) channels.
Calcium also helps in the exocytosis of the vesicles by docking
it to the plasma membrane, and thereby, leading to the release of
neurotransmitters. The release of small neurotransmitters occurs
in the proximity of transmembrane Ca+2 channels. However, the
calcium that leads to the exocytosis of vesicles containing neu-
ropeptides may also come from the intracellular calcium stores of
the transmembrane calcium influx. Once the neuropeptides Neuropeptides are
involved in diverse
physiological functions.
Several reports have
shown that a single
neuropeptide is
responsible for
regulating more than one
physiological process.
are
released from the neurons, there is no reuptake mechanism for
these peptides, as is the case with small neurotransmitters. En-
dogeneous neuropeptides can, however, be maintained at physio-
logical levels, as these peptides can be degraded by extracellular
proteases.
Mechanism of Action: Slow Neurotransmission
Neuropeptides 1Neuropeptides showing
pleiotropic effects implies that
loss of a single neuropeptide
could give rise to multiple
unrelated phenotypes.
are involved in diverse physiological functions.
Several reports have shown that a single neuropeptide is respon-
sible for regulating more than one physiological process. Hence,
many neuropeptides are thought to have pleiotropic1 effects. Neu-
ropeptides, after being released from their source neurons diffuse
RESONANCE | December 2020 1745
GENERAL ARTICLE
and act at relatively large distances. This process of dispersion
by diffusion is known as ‘volumetric transmission’. UnlikeUnlike conventional
small chemical
neurotransmitters,
neuropeptides perform
their function slowly for
a longer duration. Small
neurotransmitters are
either degraded in the
synaptic cleft (e.g.
acetylcholinesterase
hydrolyzes
acetylcholine) or are
transported back by
endocytosis after they
have performed their
function at the synapse.
However, till date, no
such reuptake machinery
for neuropeptides has
been reported.
con-
ventional small chemical neurotransmitters, neuropeptides per-
form their function slowly for a longer duration. Small neuro-
transmitters are either degraded in the synaptic cleft (e.g. acetyl-
cholinesterase hydrolyzes acetylcholine) or are transported back
by endocytosis after they have performed their function at the
synapse. However, till date, no such reuptake machinery for neu-
ropeptides has been reported. Volumetric transmission and lack
of reuptake machinery contribute to the long-lasting effects of
neuropeptides. Neuropeptides exert their function by binding to
their respective G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and thus al-
ter the levels of second messengers in the effector cells. This sig-
nal cascade leads to several changes in the cells and affects gene
expression to modulate various processes like behavior, synapto-
genesis, cellular morphology, trafficking, etc. Unlike small neu-
rotransmitters, which bind to their receptors in the postsynaptic
cell at the synaptic cleft, neuropeptides can bind to their receptors
extrasynaptically, on effector cells that are not physically con-
nected to the peptide producing neurons through synapses but in-
stead might be spatially separated over a large distance. However,
there are also instances where neuropeptides bind to the recep-
tors on the postsynaptic cell, like in the case of neuropeptide Y
which is released from the arcuate nucleus in the hypothalamus,
binds to its receptor on the postsynaptic pro-opiomelanocortin
(POMC) neuron, and goes on to hyperpolarize this neuron. Due
to the pleiotropic effect of neuropeptides, a single neuropeptide
can bind to more than one kind of GPCR, and one GPCR can also
respond to more than one type of neuropeptide ligand. Therefore,
it is very difficult to discern the exact mechanism of neuropeptide
functioning in a neural circuit.
The Functioning of the FLP-18 Neuropeptide
Our lab is interested in delineating the role of neuropeptides and
the molecular mechanism by which these peptides carry out the
signaling process to regulate behavior in the nematode Caenorhab-
1746 RESONANCE | December 2020
GENERAL ARTICLE
ditis elegans. So far in C. elegans, 113 neuropeptide genes have
been identified which code for over 250 distinct neuropeptides.
Of these genes, 31 genes code for FMRFamide-related peptides
(FLP), 40 genes code for insulin-like peptides (INS), and 42 genes
encode non-insulin, non-FMRFamide-related neuropeptides (NLP).
A recent report from our lab has shown that the FLP-18 neuropep-
tide is involved in regulating the reversal length2 2Reversal length is the distance
that the C. elegans moves back-
wards by before changing di-
rection.
in C. elegans
through its GPCRs, NPR-1 and NPR-4. The locomotory behav-
ior of C. elegans is characterized by forward movement with oc-
casional pauses followed by reversing back in order to change
its direction during the navigation (illustrated in Figure 4). Re-
versal is an important survival strategy for C. elegans, allowing
it to explore its environment in search of food and also to avoid
being the target of predators or any noxious stimulus. In particu-
lar, the worm shows a very interesting behavior while it searches
for food under laboratory conditions. When When the well-fed worm
is put on a plate without
food, it searches for food
in its proximity for
approximately 15
minutes. This behavior,
known as ‘local search’,
is characterized by
frequent reversals and
reorientations as one can
imagine the worm to do
in order to look for food
in its immediate
surroundings.
the well-fed worm
is put on a plate without food, it searches for food in its prox-
imity for approximately 15 minutes. This behavior, known as
‘local search’, is characterized by frequent reversals and reori-
entations as one can imagine the worm to do in order to look
for food in its immediate surroundings. These reversals help the
worm change direction quite frequently, and as a result, there is
very little dispersion from the point on the plate where the worm
was initially placed. If the worm fails to encounter food during
its local search, it shifts gears to go into ‘global search’. During
the global search, the reversal circuitry is suppressed and as a re-
sult, the number of reversals go down significantly. Decreased
reversals help the worm move without changing its direction so
that it can explore more areas as compared to the local search
area. The length of reversals in each exploratory behavior is cru-
cial for C. elegans as the reversal length plays an important role
in determining the angle by which the worm will change its di-
rection. The longer the reversal, the larger will be the angle (il-
lustrated in Figure 4). During a local search, the reversals are
longer, and consequently, the direction change angles would also
be greater as compared to those during the global search. Local
RESONANCE | December 2020 1747
GENERAL ARTICLE
search behavior is characterized by frequent and long reversals,
which enables the worm to reorient itself and look for food in
close vicinity. Hence, it can be speculated that the sum totals
of reversal frequency and the reversal length result in the stereo-
typic exploration during a local search. However, the length of
reversal is a critical and determining factor for the reorientation
angle. A report from our lab has shown that FLP-18 acts like a
switch and negatively regulates the reversal length. FLP-18, af-
ter being released from the AVA33Note that worm neurons are
named based on their position.
neuron, binds to its receptors
on the target neuron ASE and AVA itself to suppress the circuitry
controlling the length of reversals. In worms lacking flp-18, the
reversals during local search behavior are longer as compared to
those seen in wild type worms. Moreover, worms mutant for the
FLP-18 receptors npr-1 and npr-4 show a similar phenotype to
that of flp-18 mutants, which confirms that FLP-18 is the ligand
for NPR-1 and NPR-4. The inhibitory action of FLP-18 was fur-
ther confirmed by calcium imaging of the AVA neuron, which is
responsible for the reversals in C. elegans. Calcium is released
inside the neuron when it receives the impulse signal and is set
to fire. A rise in intracellular calcium indicates that the neuron is
firing and is active to perform its function. CalciumCalcium imaging is a
microscopic technique in
which calcium
dependent fluorescent
protein (GCaMP) is
expressed specifically in
the target neuron using a
neuron-specific
promoter.
imaging is
a microscopic technique in which calcium depending fluorescent
protein (GCaMP) is expressed specifically in the target neuron
using a neuron-specific promoter. A rise in intracellular calcium
is indicated by a change in the fluorescence activity of GCaMP.
In flp-18 mutant worms, increased calcium levels were observed
in the AVA neuron during reversals as compared to the wild type
worms. This indicated that the presence of FLP-18 suppresses
the AVA activity and thus controls the reversal length. Our lab
has also shown that there is a decrease in the expression of FLP-
18 during the local search, as it can be very well correlated with
the fact that the worm needs to perform longer reversals and thus
more reorientations, allowing the worm to perform local search
properly. In contrast, the expression of FLP-18 increases 20 folds
during the global search, and this increased expression attenuates
the reversal length circuitry as already discussed, thus decreasing
the length of reversals and reorientations and allowing the worm
1748 RESONANCE | December 2020
GENERAL ARTICLE
Figure 4. Illustrations of
different movements in C.
elegans. The four images
show forward straight, for-
ward curved, turn and rever-
sals respectively. In the last
illustration of reversal and
turn, the C. elegans moves
from position 1 to 2, then
makes a reversal to point 3
and then turns at an angle (θ)
and moves towards points 4
and 5. If the reversal is
longer, the angle of turn af-
ter the reversal increases.
to transition into global search. This study has shed light on the
importance of neuropeptides in regulating multiple behaviors of
an organism. Hence, we can speculate that any defect in the ex-
pression, synthesis, timing of the release, or binding of these neu-
ropeptides could lead to severe disease conditions in an organism.
Neuropeptides and Diseases: It Is the Balance that Matters
Neuropeptide signaling in our brain has been associated with nu-
merous physiological functions. However, the implication of these
neuropeptides in the pathophysiology of several brain-related dis-
eases is yet to be completely understood. Several reports indicate
that alteration in peptidergic signaling leads to severe pathology
in the brain. For instance, aging-related neurodegeneration has
been linked with the loss or reduction in peptidergic signaling in
the brain. Multiple studies have confirmed the altered concentra-
tion of several neuropeptides in the cerebrospinal fluid and brain
RESONANCE | December 2020 1749
GENERAL ARTICLE
tissues in patients with pathologies like dementia. Here, weMultiple studies have
confirmed the altered
concentration of several
neuropeptides in the
cerebrospinal fluid and
brain tissues in patients
with pathologies like
dementia.
dis-
cuss some of the diseases that are associated with alterations in
the levels of neuropeptides.
One of the most common neurodegenerative diseases is Alzheimer’s
disease (AD). It is a progressive disease associated with the loss
of neurons, which leads to severe conditions like dementia. In
Alzheimer’s disease-related dementia, levels of the neuropeptide
somatostatin are reduced as compared to the normal brain tissues.
Somatostatin plays a critical role in neurotransmission and cell
proliferation. Loss of somatostatin is believed to cause the de-
generation of somatostatin neurons, which leads to the loss of
normal signaling cascade and hence the neurodegenerative dis-
ease. AD has also been linked with ghrelin. Ghrelin is a 28 amino
acid long, orexigenic neuropeptide, involved in numerous physi-
ological functions including neuroprotective functions, neuroen-
docrine secretion, energy homeostasis, and higher brain functions
like mood, reward related behaviors, and learning and memory.
Reduced mRNA levels of ghrelin have been reported in the brain
tissues of patients with AD. Also, one of the single nucleotide
polymorphisms of the ghrelin gene rs4684677 (Leu90Gln) is as-
sociated with the onset of Alzheimer’s disease.
As already discussed, ghrelin is involved in modulating several
higher brain functions. Hence, it is unsurprising that altered levels
of this peptide critically affect the balance of neuronal signaling.
Apart from AD, low levels of ghrelin in the brain have also been
associated with Parkinson’s disease (PD). PD is also one of the
most common neurodegenerative diseases affecting locomotion
due to a drop in dopamine levels in the brain.
Neuropeptides signaling plays a vital role in regulating metabolic
homeostasis. There is a tight regulation of orexigenic and anorex-
igenic neuropeptide signaling with respect to the metabolic status
of the organism. Orexigenic neuropeptides include those that are
involved in appetite stimulation and consequently relay signals
to increase food intake and reduce energy expenditure. Ghrelin,
neuropeptide Y, and orexin are well-studied orexigenic neuropep-
tides. On the other hand, anorexigenic neuropeptides are those
1750 RESONANCE | December 2020
GENERAL ARTICLE
that act as appetite suppressors, inhibiting food intake, and en-
hancing energy expenditure. Leptin is a vital anorexigenic neu-
ropeptide. Any defect in the precise balance of these neuropep-
tides can thus lead to metabolic syndromes. For instance, an in-
crease in neuropeptide Y inhibits POMC neurons in the hypotha-
lamus. POMC neurons sense the metabolic status of the organism
and maintain the glucose and energy homeostasis levels. Thus,
inhibition of POMC neurons due to upregulation of neuropeptide
Y leads to increased appetite stimulation and less expenditure of
energy. This is thought to be one of the major causes of early
onset of obesity.
Conclusion
Neuropeptides are small peptides secreted by neurons or other
cells that act as signaling molecules in the nervous system. These
are slow neurotransmitters that primarily bind extra synaptically
to one or more specific GPCRs and relay signals by changing the
levels of second messengers. These peptides produce sustained
effects as there is no reuptake machinery, which can clear these
molecules from the synapse. Neuropeptide signaling modulates
multiple physiological processes and higher-order brain functions
like cognition, learning, memory, locomotion metabolism, and
the likes. Any alteration in the levels of these peptides could
lead to severe pathologies like Alzheimer’s disease and various
metabolic disorders. It can be concluded that elucidating the elu-
sive mechanism of action of these molecules might be impor-
tant not only for better understanding the physiological states of
organisms but also to identify novel biomarkers for debilitating
pathophysiological states.
Suggested Reading
[1] C Li and K Kim, Neuropeptides, WormBook, pp.1–36, 2008.
[2] Basic Neurochemistry, 6th ed (Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects), 1999;
Lippincott-Raven.
RESONANCE | December 2020 1751
GENERAL ARTICLE
[3] E E Chufan, M De, B A Eipper, R E Mains and L M Amzel, Amidation of
bioactive peptides: The structure of the lyase domain of the amidating enzyme,
Structure, Vol.17, No.7, pp.965–973, 2009.
Address for Correspondence
Umer Saleem Bhat
Department of Biological
Sciences
Indian Institute of Science
Education and Research
IISER Mohali
Knowledge City
Sector 81, SAS Nagar
Manauli PO 140 306, Punjab,
India.
Email: [email protected]
Kavita Babu
Centre for Neuroscience
Indian Institute of Science
C V Raman Road
Bangalore 560 012, India.
Email:
[4] A Bhardwaj, S Thapliyal, Y Dahiya and K Babu, FLP-18 functions through the
G-protein-coupled receptors NPR-1 and NPR-4 to modulate reversal length in
Caenorhabditis elegans, J. Neurosci., Vol.38, No.20, pp.4641–4654, 2018.
[5] M F Beal and J B Martin, Neuropeptides in neurological disease, Ann Neurol.,
Vol.20, No.5, pp.547–565, 1986.
[6] A A van der Klaauw, Neuropeptides in obesity and metabolic disease, Clinical
Chemistry, Vol.64, No.1, pp.173–182, 2018.
[7] N Shibata, T Ohnuma, B Kuerban, M Komatsu and H Arai, Genetic associ-
ation between ghrelin polymorphisms and Alzheimer’s disease in a Japanese
population, Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord., Vol.32, No.3, pp.178–181, 2011.
1752 RESONANCE | December 2020