general election 2015: what happened and...

38
General Election 2015: What Happened and Why? Roger Scully 15 th June 2015

Upload: doanh

Post on 27-May-2019

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

General Election 2015:

What Happened and Why?

Roger Scully

15th June 2015

Outline of Session

1. Introduction

2. General Election 2015: the UK Results

3. The Results in Wales

4. Why? Explaining the Election Outcome

5. Q & A

2015: Overall UK Result (changes on 2010)

Party % Vote Seats

Conservative 36.9 (+0.8) 331 (+24)

Labour 30.4 (+1.5) 232 (-26)

UKIP 12.6 (+9.5) 1 (+1)

Lib-Dems 7.9 (-15.2) 8 (-49)

SNP 4.7 (+3.1) 56 (+50)

Greens 3.8 (+2.8) 1

Others 3.7 (-2.5) 22

Notable Features of the UK Results, 1

• Slight reversal of long-term decline in two-party vote-share

• But continued fragmentation of the British party system: big rise in support for parties outside traditional three

How People Have Voted (1) 1950-2015

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Labour

Tory

How People Have Voted (2) 1950-2015

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

19

50

19

51

19

55

19

59

19

64

19

66

19

70

19

74

f

19

74

o

19

79

19

83

19

87

19

92

19

97

20

01

20

05

20

10

20

15

Others

LDs

Cons+Lab

Notable Features of the UK Results, 2

Fragmentation not just between parties but also nations: for the first time ever at a UK general election, the four constituent nations had four different parties coming first in terms of Seats & Votes:

• England: Conservatives

• Scotland: SNP

• Wales: Labour

• Northern Ireland: DUP

Notable Features of the UK Results, 3

Fragmentation, under First Past the Post, means continued high dis-proportionality: several parties winning significant vote-share but few seats.

UK elections produce high levels of dis-proportionality by international standards

But this is not a new problem…

Gallagher Index of ‘Dis-Proportionality’, UK General Elections, 1951-2015

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Notable Features of the UK Results, 4: Only small turnout rises outside Scotland

% Turnout Change on 2010

England 66.0% +0.5

Scotland 71.0% +7.2

Wales 65.5% +0.7

Northern Ireland 58.1% +0.5

% Turnout at UKGEs since 1950

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Notable Features of the UK Results, 5: Scotland!

Scotland: an ‘Out-of-Sample Event’ (Nate Silver)

• Labour lost 97.6% of the seats they won in 2010; SNP increased their seat total in Commons by 833%

• SNP increased vote share from 19.9% in 2010 to 50.0% in 2015

• SNP came within 4255 votes of winning EVERY Scottish seat; a close second in all three seats they didn’t win

Outline of Session

1. Introduction

2. General Election 2015: the UK Results

3. The Results in Wales

4. Why? Explaining the Election Outcome

5. Q & A

2015: Result in Wales (changes on 2010)

Party % Vote Seats

Labour 36.9 (+0.7) 25 (-1)

Conservative 27.2 (+1.1) 11 (+3)

Plaid Cymru 12.1 (+0.9) 3

Lib-Dems 6.5 (-13.6) 1 (-2)

UKIP 13.6 (+11.2) 0

Others 3.7 (-0.2) 0

2015 Results: Labour • Labour won the most votes,

and a majority of the seats, in Wales for the 20th successive general election (every one from 1935 onwards)

• But 36.9% was second lowest general election vote share since 1918

• Lost 0 deposits

• Highest Vote Share: Blaenau Gwent: 58.0%

• Lowest Vote Share: Montgomeryshire: 5.6%

Best Vote Share Changes From 2010 • Cardiff Central: +11.2% • Merthyr Tydfil & Rhymney: +10.2% • Swansea West: +7.9% • Blaenau Gwent: +5.6% • Brecon & Radnor: +4.2% Worst Vote Share Changes from 2010 • Cynon Valley: -4.8% • Rhondda: -4.6% • Carm. West & South Pembs: -4.0% • Vale of Clwyd: -3.9% • Aberavon: -3.0%

2015 Results: Conservative • Highest number of

Conservative seats in Wales since the 14 won in 1983

• However, lower vote share than in 1987 or 1992

• Lost 0 deposits

• Highest Vote Share: Monmouth: 49.9%

• Lowest Vote Share: Rhondda: 6.7%

Best Vote Share Changes From 2010 • Wrexham: +6.2% • Aberconwy: +5.7% • Gower: +5.1% • Cardiff North: +4.9% • Brecon & Radnor: +4.5% Worst Vote Share Changes from 2010 • Cardiff Central: -6.9% • Cardiff West: -4.5% • Arfon: -3.8% • Aberavon: -2.4% • Preseli Pembrokeshire: -2.4%

2015 Results: UKIP • UKIP lost deposits in all 41

seats where they stood in Scotland; lost 0 in Wales despite standing in all 40 seats

• Vote share increased more than five-fold in Wales

• Five highest vote-shares in Wales all in South-East Region

• Highest Vote Share: Islwyn: 19.6%

• Lowest Vote Share: Cardiff Central: 6.5%

Best Vote Share Changes From 2010 • Caerphilly: +17.0% • Islwyn: +16.9% • Torfaen: +16.7% • Newport East: +16.5% • Blaenau Gwent: +16.4% Worst Vote Share Changes from 2010 • Cardiff Central: +4.4% • Cardiff North: +5.4% • Arfon: +5.9% • Brecon & Radnor: +6.1% • Vale of Glamorgan: +7.6%

2015 Results: Plaid Cymru • Vote share up in general

election for first time since 2001

• Third highest Plaid vote share ever at a general election

• Lost 7 deposits

• Highest Vote Share: Arfon: 43.9%

• Lowest Vote Share: Newport East: 3.5%

Best Vote Share Changes From 2010 • Rhondda: +8.9% • Arfon: +8.0% • Cardiff West: +6.9% • Blaenau Gwent: +4.9% • Aberavon: +4.5% Worst Vote Share Changes from 2010 • Llanelli: -7.0% • Aberconwy: -6.1% • Cynon Valley: -3.5% • Dwyfor Meirionydd: -3.5% • Clwyd West: -3.2%

2015 Results: Liberal Democrats

• Lowest vote share in Wales since 1966

• Lower vote share in Wales than in either England or Scotland

• Lost 30 deposits

• Highest Vote Share: Ceredigion: 35.9%

• Lowest Vote Share: Rhondda: 1.5%

Best Vote Share Changes From 2010 • Ynys Môn: -5.4% • Islwyn: -7.7% • Blaenau Gwent: -8.2% • Dywfor Meirionydd: -8.3% • Llanelli: -8.5% Worst Vote Share Changes from 2010 • Merthyr Tydfil & Rhymney: -26.9% • Newport East: 25.8% • Swansea West: -24.2% • Wrexham: -20.5% • Bridgend: -18.4%

How Did Parties Perform Locally?

• Can evaluate against pre-election expectations

• In following slides, seat in bold if party won

Party Status of Seat

Uncompetitive Competitive

Held Safe Defence

Non-Held Hopeless Target

Electoral Battleground: Labour Party Status of Seat

Uncompetitive Competitive

Held 22 remaining seats Gower

Vale of Clwyd

Ynys Môn Llanelli (?)

Non-Held Brecon & Radnor Ceredigion Clwyd West

Dwyfor Meirionydd Monmouth

Montgomery

Aberconwy Arfon

Cardiff Central Cardiff North

Carm East & D. Carm W & SP

Vale of Glamorgan Preseli Pembs (?)

Electoral Battleground: Conservatives

Party Status of Seat

Uncompetitive Competitive

Held Monmouth Clwyd West

Aberconwy Cardiff North Carm W & SP Montgomery

Vale of Glamorgan Preseli Pembs (?)

Non-Held 31 remaining seats Gower

Vale of Clwyd

Brecon & Radnor

Electoral Battleground: Lib-Dems

Party Status of Seat

Uncompetitive Competitive

Held Brecon & Radnor Cardiff Central

Ceredigion

Non-Held 36 remaining seats Montgomery

Electoral Battleground: Plaid Cymru

Party Status of Seat

Uncompetitive Competitive

Held Dwyfor Meirionydd Arfon Carm East & D.

Non-Held 34 remaining seats Ynys Môn Ceredigion Llanelli (?)

Outline of Session

1. Introduction

2. General Election 2015: the UK Results

3. The Results in Wales

4. Why? Explaining the Election Outcome

5. Q & A

Election 2015: Why? 1 Votes Seats • ConLab swing in England of c.1.1%; should

have seen net Labour gain from Tories of 15 seats; actual net gain of 4

• LabCon swing in Wales of 0.2%; should have seen no seat changes; actual Con gain of 2

• Conservative local campaigning highly effective: o Perhaps some first-time incumbency effect? o Maybe also squeezing UKIP votes in marginals? (BES) o ‘Black Widow’ strategy in Lib-Dem seats

• ‘Labour Doorstep’ less effective in key seats – contrast with 2010

Campaigns: Contact as of early-March

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Yes No Don't Know

‘Have you been contacted by someone from a political party about the General Election?’

Of Those Contacted (March): Which Party?

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Labour Conservative Lib-Dems Plaid UKIP

Campaigns: Contact (BES Campaign Survey)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Yes No Don't Know

‘Have any of the political parties contacted you during the previous four weeks?’

Of Those Contacted (May): Which Party?

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Labour Conservative Lib-Dems Plaid UKIP

Election 2015: Why? 2 A Valence election

• Substantial Conservative advantage on economic competence

• Substantial Conservative advantage on leadership

No governing party has ever lost a general election when simultanously leading on both factors

Election result therefore really shouldn’t have been so surprising; it was, because of…

Election 2015: Why? 3 The Polls: where did it all go so wrong?

• Polls very close to final outcome in Scotland and in Wales; problems in England

• In England, polls close on UKIP, Lib-Dems and Greens

• Core problem was over-estimate of Labour and under-statement of Conservatives: common to different pollsters, different methods etc

• WHY? o Late Swing?

o Polls were always wrong?

For Wales, See England?

• Election extended much further the divergence of Scottish electoral politics from those in England

• For Wales, trends less clear; has always been influenced by rest of Britain, although also persisting differences

Tory Electoral Support, England, Scotland & Wales, 1945-2015

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Scotland

England

Wales

Labour Electoral Support, England, Scotland & Wales, 1945-2015

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Scotland

England

Wales

Gap Between Electoral Support in England and Wales, Conservatives & Labour, 1945-2015

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

Dissimilarity From England: Election Results Scotland & Wales, 1945-2015

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Any Questions?

www.cf.ac.uk/wgc [email protected]