georges d’hollander maj gen, bear director, nhq c3 staff, and also
DESCRIPTION
The NATO HQ need for the Web: How policy requirements are affected by the need to take web development into account. Georges D’hollander Maj Gen, BEAR Director, NHQ C3 Staff, and also Vice-Chairman NC3 Board. Briefing Outline. Background Transformation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
The NATO HQ need for the Web:
How policy requirements are affected by the need to take web development
into account
The NATO HQ need for the Web:
How policy requirements are affected by the need to take web development
into account
Georges D’hollanderMaj Gen, BEAR
Director, NHQ C3 Staff, and also
Vice-Chairman NC3 Board
2
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Briefing Outline
Background Transformation Interoperability
Architectures NATO Maturity Levels NATO Interoperability Standards and Profiles
Information Management Information Assurance Conclusion
3
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Transformation (1)
Dramatic slimming down of NATO command structure Establishment of:
Allied Command for Operations (Mons, BE) Allied Command for Transformation (Norfolk, USA)
Establishment of NATO response force: Small, agile, highly deployable Multinational composed of contributions from many
nations, some contributions small in size
NATO led operations include force contributions from many NATO and non-NATO nations
4
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Transformation (2)
NRF seen as a key catalyst to help transform NATO:
Rotation cycle of 6 months A challenge to interoperability at all levels
NATO commands adopting an Effects Based Approach to Operations and have identified 7 key Transformational Area (ToAs)
Political
Military Economic
SocialInfrastructure
Information
Vulnerabilities
Links
Nodes
Weaknesses
Dependencies
Strengths
Relationships
5
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Development of otherDevelopment of otherTransformation Objective AreasTransformation Objective Areas
NEC National InitiativesNEC National Initiativesand Coordinationand Coordination
• NNEC Foundation Document
• Political Guidance
NNEC Strategic Framework
NNEC Strategic Framework
Vision and Concept
Compendium of NNEC related Architecture
Roadmap
Detailed Plan
• NNEC Feasibility Study
• Commercial world
• Transformation Objective Areas inputs
Business Case
6
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Interoperability
What is interoperability? Human Technical Procurement
Interoperability epochs Yesterday Today Tomorrow
7
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Interoperability - Systems and Standards
Key multinational initiatives: TACOMS (Post 2000) Secure Communications Interoperability Protocol (SCIP) Waveform development Exploitation of Software Defined Radio NATO Friendly Force Indicator (NFFI) Multilateral interoperability Program (MIP) Core enterprise services Many of these had been initiated well before the NNEC Feasibility Study, but
fit well with the recommendations
But also note: The good thing about standards is that we have so many to choose from! So need to focus on idea of net readiness and clear out the old standards
Multiple Commercial Technologies!
Multiple Commercial Technologies!
Web Services XML, OWL .Net, J2EE
Web Services XML, OWL .Net, J2EE
Data Mediation Portals Replication
Data Mediation Portals Replication
IntelligentIntelligent
8
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Briefing Outline
Background Transformation Interoperability
Architectures NATO Maturity Levels NATO Interoperability Standards and Profiles
Information Management Information Assurance Conclusion
9
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
NATO Architecture Development
CP
System CentricService Centric
SoSEService
Orchestration
2007
2008
2009
2010Federation of
SystemsSystem of Services
NM
L E
volu
tion
NIS
P E
volu
tion
2006
Service
Definition
NNEC Convergence
CP CPCP
CP
CPCPCP
CPCP
10
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
NNEC Architecture FrameworkS
ervice Man
agem
ent &
Co
ntro
l
Info
rmatio
n A
ssuran
ce
Users & Missions
Community of Interest
Information Integration
Communications
Governance
Networking & Information Infrastructure(NII)
STANDALONE
STANDALONE
Maritime
ForcesMariti
me
Forces
SOFSOF
Air
ForcesAir
Forces
Land
ForcesLand
ForcesSTANDALONE
STANDALONE
Maritime
ForcesMariti
me
Forces
SOFSOF
Air
ForcesAir
Forces
Land
ForcesLand
Forces
6 Service areas
11
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Architecture Companions: NML & NISP
MissionSpace
MissionSpace InformationInformation ApplicationsApplications Technical
InfrastructureTechnical
Infrastructure
Functionality
Construction
Implementation
Abstraction levelsAbstraction levels
Aspect Areas Aspect Areas
Information Assurance
Service Management & Control
Comm
unity
o
f Int
eres
t
Info
rmat
ion
Inte
grat
ion
Comm
uni
catio
nsUser Missions Operations
Target ArchitecturesTarget Architectures
Overarching ArchitectureOverarching ArchitectureEnterpriseEnterpriseReferenceReference
ArchitecturesArchitectures
NMLService
Categories & Groups
NMLService
Categories & Groups
NISP
Standards &Profiles
NISP
Standards &Profiles
Req
uir
emen
ts
Gu
ide
& a
sse
ss
12
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
NISP Emerging Profiles
Layer 1Vision Policy Architecture Processes
Layer 2Communication Services
Layer 3Information & Integration
Services
Layer 4Functional Area Services
Layer 5Users & Missions
NRFNATION A
Layer 1Vision Policy Architecture Processes
Layer 2Communication Services
Layer 3Information & Integration
Services
Layer 4Functional Area Services
Layer 5Users & Missions
NRFNATION B
Layer 1 Vision Policy Architecture
Processes
Layer 2Communication Services
Layer 3Information & Integration
Services
Layer 4Functional Area Services
Layer 5Users & Missions
NRF LAND
IPV6, TCP, UDP, FIBER OPTIC, ETHERNET,
WEB BROWSING, MESSAGING, DISCOVERY, COLLABORATION
Service Interoperability Point
• Service Oriented• Net-Centric & Integrated Information Services for:
− Information Sharing with various partners− Support across varying mission classification levels − Interconnected by diverse & transitional communications services − Meshed Functional COIs and Enterprise use
• Profiles for Services (e.g. Messaging, Discovery, Collaboration)• Transport Layer Profiles based on IPv6
SECURITY
SECURITY
MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
13
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Briefing Outline
Background Transformation Interoperability
Architectures NATO Maturity Levels NATO Interoperability Standards and Profiles
Information Management Information Assurance Conclusion
14
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Key IM Objectives
Support the achievement of Information Superiority
Optimise the use of information resources Support the identification and preservation of
information of permanent value
15
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Increased Information Flow
Achieving interoperability more data can be transferred and more information will be exchanged and available
Different information needs at different command levels
16
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Information Management
What is IM about? IM aspects:
Industry - Technology Human Doctrine Procedures Organisation (Chief Information Officer) Quality Security
17
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Briefing Outline
Background Transformation Interoperability
Architectures NATO Maturity Levels NATO Interoperability Standards and Profiles
Information Management Information Assurance Conclusion
18
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Information Assurance Challenges
•IA Roadmap and IA Business Case in support of NNEC Strategic Framework documents
Secure and Flexible Transport Services Secure and Dynamic Information Sharing NII Security Management and Cyber-defence NEC Security concepts, Policy and Architecture
•Information Assurance Subcommittee ResponseCross domain IssuesTechnical IA ServicesSecurity Management InfrastructuresCryptographic Services
19
NATO HQ
C3 Staff
Conclusion
Driven by the mission to ensure provision of interoperability allied with transformation
and NNEC…
policy and other regulatory documents, including governance are biased by the
need to take web development into account