getting beam to mu2e *

13
f Getting Beam to mu2e Getting Beam to mu2e * * Eric Prebys, AD/Proton Source *This is essentially a dramatically shortened version of Dave McGinnis’ wine and cheese talk on 9/15 (http://theory.fnal.gov/jetp/talks/mcginnis.pdf)

Upload: justine-noel

Post on 01-Jan-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Getting Beam to mu2e *. Eric Prebys, AD/Proton Source. *This is essentially a dramatically shortened version of Dave McGinnis’ wine and cheese talk on 9/15 ( http://theory.fnal.gov/jetp/talks/mcginnis.pdf ). Location of Mu2E target and Detector. Detector. Booster Ring. Giese Road. Target. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

f

Getting Beam to mu2eGetting Beam to mu2e**

Eric Prebys, AD/Proton Source

*This is essentially a dramatically shortened version of Dave McGinnis’ wine and cheese talk on 9/15 (http://theory.fnal.gov/jetp/talks/mcginnis.pdf)

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 2

f Location of Mu2E target and DetectorLocation of Mu2E target and Detector

Target

Detector

ExtractedBeam LineFrom Debuncher

AP-10

AP-30

AP-50

MI-8

Giese Road

Booster Ring

Debuncher/Accumulator Ring

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 3

f Present Operation of Debuncher/AccumulatorPresent Operation of Debuncher/Accumulator

Protons are accelerated to 120 GeV in Main Injector and extracted to pBar target

pBars are collected and phase rotated in the “Debuncher”

Transferred to the “Accumulator”, where they are cooled and stacked

Antiproton capabilities not needed after collider program

Not used in SNuMI I

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 4

f SNuMI II Operation (“McGinnis scheme”)SNuMI II Operation (“McGinnis scheme”)

New AP4 line built to inject 8 GeV protons directly from Booster to accumulator, where they are momentum stacked.

New AP5 line used to extract protons to Recycler, where they are boxcar stacked while the Main Injector is ramping.

Recycler load transferred to Main Injector, where it is accelerated to 120 GeV for neutrino program.

Debuncher NOT used.

AP4 Line

A-D Line

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 5

f Momentum StackingMomentum Stacking

Inject in a newly accelerated Booster batch every 67 mS onto the low momentum orbit of the Accumulator

The freshly injected batch is accelerated towards the core orbit where it is merged and debunched into the core orbit

Momentum stack 3-4 Booster batches

T<133ms

T=134ms

T=0

Energy

1st batch is injected onto the injection orbit

1st batch is accelerated to the core orbit

T<66ms

2nd Batch is injected

T=67ms

2nd Batch is accelerated

3rd Batch is injected

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 6

f

AP4 Line

AP5 LineA-D Line

Mu2e ModificationMu2e Modification

Momentum stacked beam is transferred from the Accumulator to the Debuncher in a new transfer line (A-D line)

Beams is rebunched in Debuncher into a single, short (~200 ns) bunch.

Beam is slow extracted to experiment

Result: a train of short pulses separated by one Accumulator revolution (~1.6 usec) – perfect for mu2e

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 7

f Mu2e and SNUMIMu2e and SNUMI

22 batches = 1. 467s MI cycle

Booster Batches

Accumulator

Recycler

Debuncher

4.61012 p/batch

44.61012 p/1467ms = 12.5 1012 p/sec

56 1012 p/sec

0.1s 1.367s

NEUTRINO PROGRAM MUONS

(NuMI +Muons)

(NuMI)

(Muons)

(Alternative: 24 batches=1.6s MI cycle 11.5 1012 p/s)

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 8

f Beam Bunching for mu2eBeam Bunching for mu2e

Bunch beam to a fraction of the Debuncher circumference < ~200ns of 1700ns

Keep beam leakage outside that bunch length to a minimum

Debuncher timings are similarto MECO/BNL

Develop most effective/efficient bunching scheme barrier bucket Multi-harmonic

Will need a fast kicker in the Debuncher ring to further clean gap.

Multi-harmonic example rf multi-harmonic

buncher• Example: h=1,

Vrf=30kV; h=2, Vrf = 15kV, h=3, Vrf =10kV

• h=4: 7.5 50kV (to hold compressed beam)

0.055s for bunching

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 9

f Resonant Slow ExtractionResonant Slow Extraction

Extraction scheme appears workable Studying details of resonance generation

Also comparing 2nd integer vs. 3rd integer Extraction loss a worry

~ 500W loss with typical (2-3%) resonant extraction inefficiencies Must be considered from the beginning in the design

D4Q3 D4Q2 D50Q D5Q2

options:

MI/TeV style septum - 80kV/1cm field region - 3 m long

Short version of MI style Lambertson - ~ .8T field region - +- 5” extraction aperture - 1 m long

Wide aperture C magnet - ~.8 T - 2 m

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 10

f Booster Throughput ScenariosBooster Throughput Scenarios

All the proton upgrades rely on increased Booster throughput

Parameter Sept. 2005 Prot. Plan SNUMI 1 SNUMI 2a SNUMI 2b

Booster Flux 6.4 13.5 13.1 22.6 25.1 x1016/Hr

Collider Flux 1.1 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 x1016/Hr

NUMI Flux 3.2 7.5 13.1 22.6 20.5 x1016/HrNUMI Beam Power 162 372 648 1181 1073 kW

8 GeV Flux 2.1 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.6 x1016/Hr

Parameter Sept. 2005 Prot. Plan SNUMI 1 SNUMI 2a SNUMI 2b

Collider Final Intensity 6.9 8 0 0 0 x1012

NUMI Final Intensity 22 40 45 82 82 x1012

MI Cycle Time 2.60 2.07 1.33 1.33 1.47 SecCollider Batches 2 2 0 0 0NUMI Batches 5 9 12 18 18

Four years running 5 1020 protons 1.3 1018 stopped muons

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 11

f ExtinctionExtinction

The desired extinction factor of 109 is challenging

Still in the brainstorming phase Probably several stages

Bunch formation Gap cleaning kicker (once?, multiple?) Resonant extraction manipulation

• AC quads?• Electron lens?

Beamline elements• RF cavities?• AC dipoles?

Needs a lot more thought

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 12

f Shielding IssuesShielding Issues

Present anti-proton rate in pBar tunnel ~15e10 pbar/hr

Proton rate for SNuMI II ~2.3-2.5e17 protons/hr

Mu2e protons Additional 15% Total protons 15Hz*5e12*3600 = 2.7e17 pph =96 kW

Bad news This is almost 2 million times the current antiproton rate in

this enclosure! An uncontrolled beam loss of 1W/m => 99.5% efficiency!

Good news Mu2e represents a fairly small perturbation on SNuMI Would definitely implement solution for full 15 Hz Booster

output anyway as part of SNuMI II There “appears to be a solution” for SNuMI II

• Interlocked radiation detectors• Area reclassification (fence?)

mu2e Meeting with Pier , November 10,2006 – Prebys 13

f ConclusionsConclusions

We have a conceptual scheme to produce an 8 GeV proton beam appropriate for a m to e conversion experiment in the style of MECO.

This scheme assumes that the lab pursues the proposed “SNuMI II” option for the neutrino program.

There is a lot of work to be done!