Mu2e WGM

9/15/2010

R. Ray

Mu2e Project manager

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 2

L2 Systems and Managers

1.2 Accelerator

S. WerkemaFNAL

1.3 Conventional ConstructionT. Lackowski

FNAL

1.4 Solenoids

M. LammFNAL

1.5 Muon Channel

S. FeherFNAL

1.6 Tracker

A. MukherjeeFNAL

1.7 Calorimeter

Stefano MiscettiFrascati

1.8 Cosmic Ray

VetoC. Dukes

UVa.

1.9 Trigger and

DAQM. Bowden

FNAL

1.1 Project

ManagementR. RayFNAL

Stefano Miscetti from Frascati has agreed to serve as the L2 Manager for the Calorimeter. We have some catching up to do…

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 3

ES&H

• Completed draft of Preliminary HA (required for CD-1) based on input from L2 Managers

32 pages of text. 96 pages of Hazard analysis sheets Received a number of useful comments from PPD ES&H. Will send to

ES&H for comment, but I think that for CD-1 this is good enough.

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 4

QA Plan

• Draft Quality Assurance Plan written.• Sent to Keith Schuh, PPD QA Representative. Comments incorporated.• Meeting with Keith and new Lab QA Engineer to talk about how they can help

us.• Document probably good enough for CD-1.

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 5

Acquisition Strategy

First draft completed and sent to FSO.• Performance parameters defined• Alternative and Risk Analysis• Recommended Alternative• Business and Acquisition Approach – FRA acts as the prime contractor

Major contracts Special Acquisition Procedures Performance incentives Small business approach Competition

• Management Structure – IPT• Interdependencies and Interfaces

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 6

AS - Location Alternatives

Fermilab• High duty factor beam (90%)• Least costly of the fully evaluated alternatives• Fermilab staff is the most significant stakeholder

BNL• Lower duty factor (50%) but potentially higher beam power• AGS upgrades more expensive than modifications to Fermilab Accelerator complex• Integration issues with RICH program funded out of NP.

Los Alamos• 800 MeV proton beam ideal for producing low energy muon beam with no

antiproton contamination.• Low duty factor beam (10%)• Detector hall, beam modification costs unknown.

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 7

AS - Life Cycle Costs

• Similar cost to build detector at any US location.• Operating costs similar• Fermilab requires construction of detector hall.• Accelerator modifications at Fermilab less than AGS upgrade.

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 8

AS - Technical Alternatives

Alternatives for providing proton beam• Booster to Recycler to Accumulator to Debuncher to Mu2e• Booster to Accumulator to Debuncher to Mu2e

Requires a new transfer line from Booster to Accumulator

• New dedicated accelerator facility Non starter. Too expensive.

• Wait for Project X Unacceptable delay Inconsistent with Mission Need Statement

Alternatives for Producing a Muon Beam• S-shape vs C-shape Transport Solenoid.

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 9

AS - Technical Alternatives

Detector Alternatives• Tracking detectors and calorimeters• Cosmic ray veto technologies

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 10

Risk Analysis

• Scope and definition of project - Low• Functional performance – Moderate• ES&H – Very low• Cost and Schedule – Moderate• Workforce issues – High• Funding and Budget – Low• Interfaces and Integration – Low• Safeguards and Security – Low• Location and Site Conditions – Very low• Stakeholder Issues – Very low

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 11

CDR

• Format defined. Preliminary chapters being written.• Will meet with L2 mangers next week and provide them with a format and tell

them to get started on their chapters.

X.1 Introduction X.2 Requirements X.3 Recommended Alternative (includes performance of design, shows how

design meets requirements and discusses optimization of design)

X.4 Alternatives Considered X.5 Risks X.6 ES&H X.7 Quality Assurance X.8 Value Management X.9 References

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 12

Accelerator Progress

• S. Werkema now fully in charge• Progress on external beamline design – impacts building location

We think we are now good for CD-1

• Requirement on width of proton pulse (in time) revisited Went from calamity to small problem that we can deal with. Narrower pulse is better. Tradeoff with momentum aperture of Accumulator. Possible technical solutions to make the pulse narrower but we have to

understand the cost. Won’t do this for CD-1.

• Progress on understanding shielding requirements for 25 kW operation. Skyshine Electronic berm Service building floor loading for possible additional shielding. Cost estimates for supplemental shielding, eberm and fences.

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 13

Locations

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 14

Solenoid Progress

• DS in better shape now that we have settled on field requirements.• PS and TS continue on good course.

PS – TS interface completed. PS length increased by 67.5 mm to better match fields.

Working to understand mechanical forces in all on-off power scenarios.

• Working toward magnet CDR that would be sent to vendors as part of an RFI to continue/expand dialogue with industry.

• Meeting with representative of Babcock Noell next week who will be in the area.

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 15

Muon Channel

• Sandor has a large and diverse system that he is managing well.• Weekly meetings• Most L3 managers in place• Recent progress on

external shielding, vacuum system, muon beam stop TS3 collimator …

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 16

Conventional Construction

• Good progress on requirements. Mature draft of requirements document

now available.

• Meetings with stakeholders• Beam line length fixed• Building location fixed.

Requires road diversion that will have to be costed.

• Preparing to bring in A&E firm to help with Conceptual Design.

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 17

Staffing

• L2 Managers are doing a good job of identifying L3 managers.• For CD-1 I still need

Deputyo Increasing need. I can’t keep up with everything.

Project EE – should have someone on board from PPD soon. o Mu2e, LBNE, CMS all need a Project EE and 3 highly qualified candidates

have been identified.o After discussions with the candidates a decision will be made about the best

match for each project. Project Risk Manager

o 25% of an FTE at this point.

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 18

CD-1

Lehman CD-1 Review March 1, 2011

Director’s Review Feb. 1, 2011

CDR complete Jan. 15, 2011

Final cost & schedule and associated documentation.

Jan. 15, 2011

L2 CDR contributions submitted Dec. 1, 2010

Pre CD-1 Cost and Schedule Review Nov 15, 2010

Director’s Design Review Nov. 1, 2010

L2 Design Reviews October, 2010

Time

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 19

Schedule

CD-1 CD-2/3a

CD-3b

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 20

Requirements

R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 21

Action Items

• Get L2 Manager for calorimeter in place – R. Ray Done. Have to play catch up now.

• Get moving on Electronics – Ron Ray Project EE in place soon.

• Complete set of requirements documents – Miller/Bernstein Light at the end of the tunnel, but not there yet.

• Start scheduling L2 design reviews• Develop a plan for Directors Design Review and Pre-CD-1 Review