gexcon ddt scotts presentation

Upload: mochamad-safarudin

Post on 02-Jun-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    1/33

    GexCon US

    Deflagration to Detonation Transitions: Is my

    Facility at Risk of a DDT

    by

    Scott G. Davis, Camilo Rosas, Derek Engel, Prankul

    Middha, and Kees van Wingerden,

    GexCon

    October 24, 2012

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    2/33

    GexCon US

    Outline

    Facility Siting

    DDT

    Recent DDT incidents

    CFD - FLACS to predict onset DDT

    Expand validation

    Previous work - H2, ethylene, propane and other HCs

    Future work small, medium, large scale

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    3/33

    GexCon US 3

    Experiments 45 m long array of cross flow obstructions - no confinement

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    4/33

    GexCon US 4

    Experiments obstructed vs. non-obstructed

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    5/33

    GexCon US 5

    Experiments obstructed vs. non-obstructed

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    6/33

    GexCon US

    Region 2

    Region 1

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    7/33

    GexCon US7

    Experiments DDT and Detonation

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    8/33

    GexCon US8

    Experiments DDT and Detonation

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    9/33

    GexCon US9

    Experiments in congested area

    DDT and Detonation

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    10/33

    GexCon US

    Region 2

    Region 1

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    11/33

    GexCon US

    Recent Incidents potential DDT

    Buncefield Fuel Depot

    2005

    Sunrise Propane - 2008

    Jaipur Oil Depot - 2009

    Puerto Rico Fuel Storage - 2009

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    12/33

    GexCon US

    FLACS CFD for Explosions and Dispersion

    FLACS has been validated on hundreds of large-scale experiments

    FLACS simulates the three-dimensional development of explosionsthrough clouds of vapor mixtures in complex geometries

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    13/33

    GexCon US

    Buncefield fuel depot UK

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    14/33

    GexCon US

    Damage from 11thDecember 2005 explosion

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    15/33

    GexCon US

    Buncefield Lane vegetation consistent with

    pipework in densely congested process area

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    16/33

    GexCon US

    Photograph of coppiced tree on Cherry Tree Lane

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    17/33

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    18/33

    GexCon US

    Estimated overpressure based on damage (left)

    compared with FLACS simulation pressures

    G C US

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    19/33

    GexCon US

    Estimated likelihood of DDT

    G C US

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    20/33

    GexCon US

    FLACS simulation with traditional trees with

    large trunks (little undergrowth)

    Flame propagation Overpressure [bar]

    G C US

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    21/33

    GexCon US

    Simulated overpressures without trees (left) and

    with trees with large trunks (little underbrush)

    No trees Trees with large trunks

    G C US

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    22/33

    GexCon US

    FLACS Predictions onset of DDT

    Likelihood of DDT Spatial pressure gradient across the flame front

    Extensively tested against hydrogen DDT experiments

    DPDX < 0.5: No DDT

    0.5 < DPDX< 1.0: DDT is possible

    5 < DPDX< 10: DDT is likely

    G C US

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    23/33

    GexCon US

    FLACS Predictions onset of DDT

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    24/33

    G C USH2 & Eth l t t

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    25/33

    GexCon USH2 & Ethylene testsShell/HSL pipe-racks 3m x 3m x 2m (with 4 or 7 rows of pipes)

    (results not available)

    GexCon USH2 & Eth l t t

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    26/33

    GexCon USH2 & Ethylene testsH2phi=0.8

    GexCon USEth l lid ti t t MERGE

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    27/33

    GexCon USEthylene validation tests MERGEBritish Gas pipe-racks 4m x 4m x 2m, 4 different configurations

    Notice:

    Pressure sensors along ground 0.0m, 0.4m, 0.8m, 1.2m, 1.6m and 2.0m (1-6)

    Flame sensors at same distances, but at unknown height (0.5m?)

    GexCon USEth l lid ti t t MERGE B

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    28/33

    GexCon USEthylene validation tests MERGE B

    DPDX max = 7

    GexCon USEth l lid ti t t MERGE D

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    29/33

    GexCon USEthylene validation tests MERGE D

    DPDX max = 4

    GexCon US

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    30/33

    GexCon US

    Future Work Joint Industry Project

    Small to Very large Experimental Tests Texas A&M small/medium scale

    GexCon medium/large scale

    Stanford Research Inst. (SRI) large/very large

    3,000 to 5,000 m3

    Various Fuels

    Methane, propane, ethylene, acetylene, etc.

    Safety Gap Analysis DDT onset

    GexCon US

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    31/33

    GexCon US

    SRI Hydrogen Tests 300m3dome

    GexCon US

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    32/33

    GexCon US

    SRI Hydrogen Tests

    GexCon US

  • 8/10/2019 Gexcon DDT Scotts Presentation

    33/33

    GexCon US

    Summary

    Importance of considering DDT in facility siting

    FLACS tool to help predict onset of DDT

    Research Collaboration Texas A&M, GexCon, SRI

    Expand the prediction to various HCs

    Further small, medium and large scale tests