gis and evaluating ecosystem services jim quinn information center for the environment ucdavis...

18
GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis [email protected]

Upload: angelina-hart

Post on 12-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

GIS and evaluating ecosystem services

Jim QuinnInformation Center for the Environment

[email protected]

Page 2: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Economic Outputs of Sustainably Managed Ecosystems

• Marketed goods– Food and fiber– Recreational opportunities– Water– Coming – Carbon Sequestration

Page 3: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Economic Outputs of Sustainably Managed Ecosystems

• Costs avoided– Health impacts of air and water pollution– Fire– Flooding

• Non-market values– Wildlife– Stewardship values, etc.

Page 4: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Big money

• New York City– $4.5 billion in water treatment avoided

• Millennium Assessment – Hundreds of billions of savings to cities in

water supply and water quality alone

• Just because large amounts of money are hard to measure doesn’t mean they should be ignored

Page 5: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Charge to land use agencies, planners, and NGOs

• A land use plan that provides an effective portfolio of production and ecosystem values

• Institutional framework so beneficiaries reimburse providers

Page 6: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

What do we know pretty well?

• Land use and land cover

• Drinking water quality

• Watershed management projects

Page 7: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Habitat TypesElkhorn Slough Watershed

Page 8: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Drinking Water Sources for Public Water Systems* in California

Page 9: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Statewide Assessment ResultsGroundwater Sources

Page 10: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Watershed Protection Natural Resources Project Inventory

Page 11: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu
Page 12: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Where do we need better information?

• Non-point-source threats– (e.g. nutrients and pathogens from septic

systems)

• Groundwater recharge zones

• Water delivery and pricing

Page 13: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

What can we model?

• Future land use

• Watershed exports

• Economic performance of competing land use scenarios (as in the Blueprint process)?

Page 14: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Future Land UseSJ Valley Growth Scenarios (UPlan)

• Many Different types:– Compact– Species Protection– Ag. Protection– Urban Cores– Economic

Development

Page 15: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

Digital Elevation Model10 meter resolution

Riparian Corridor Delineation200 meter radius from streams1996 Aerial Photographs

Hourly Solar Incidence for Critical Date: July 22

Vegetation DistributionConverted to Height by DBH Class& Percent Hardwood / Conifer

Reach Averaged Values attributed to linear hydrographic network for Current Conditions & Potential Conditions

Restoring Impaired WaterwaysRiparian-Topographic Shading Model

Page 16: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

RipTopo & Aquatic Conservation

Page 17: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

RipTopo Riparian Corridor

Page 18: GIS and evaluating ecosystem services Jim Quinn Information Center for the Environment UCDavis jfquinn@ucdavis.edu

CurrentShadingConditions

PotentialShadingConditions

RipTopo Model Results