glennon knowles researching the virtual constituency
DESCRIPTION
Researching the virtual constituency: methods for analysing politicians’ use of social mediaTRANSCRIPT
Researching the virtual constituency: methods for analysing politicians’ use of social media
@JoanneKnowlesUK@RussGlennonLiverpool John Moores University
Perspective & context
Rooted in research on social media and public relations theory & practice, and in teaching practices on 2 modules, Public Communication (L5) & Mass Communications: Policy & Practice (L6) on the Media, Culture, Communication degree programme
Social media have been posited as having the capacity to address accelerating public disengagement from politics, by enabling models of two-way symmetrical communication (Grunig & Hunt, 1984)
However, does e-campaigning actually replicate the patterns of offline campaigning (Vergeer, Hermans & Sams, 2011) and thus reinforce existing patterns of political and institutional dominance?
How can a tool feted for its global reach be effectively used for dialogue with local publics?
Likewise, how can they be used effectively at a local level with students?
Teaching & research methodology
Research training for students in both quantitative & qualitative approaches
Given pedagogical emphasis on developing the student as researcher (HEA; Healey & Jenkins, 2009) seeking to build an understanding of, and experience of, the research process into teaching sessions wherever possible
Content analysis forms part of Level 4 study and enables students to see how quantitative & qualitative approaches can be used in combination
Students can also test out the stages of conducting an analysis: selecting material, identifying categories for coding, carrying out coding and analysing the outcomes
Content analysis
‘A research technique based upon measuring (counting) the amount of something (violence, [...] women, professional types, or whatever) in a random sampling of some forms of communication(such as comics, sitcoms, soap operas, news shows)’ (Berger, 1991, p.92)
A research technique for making replicable and valid inferences from data to their context’ (Krippendorff, 1980, p.21)
‘The systematic, objective, quantitative analysis of message characteristics’ (Neuendorf, 2002, p.1)
Methodology for our project Content analysis as offering ability to conduct
qualitative & quantitative analysis and to scope out areas of interest for project in future
Opportunity sample of MPs – 10/15 selected Research questions turned into draft coding
structure, developed out of that used in Graham et al’s 2013 analysis of 2010 General Election
Coded against six main headings: type of tweet; content of tweet; primary topic; level at which the issue resides; level that the tweet focuses upon; hashtag use
Initial collection period January 2014: N=961
Previous research
Most focuses on the USA (Bimber and Copeland, 2013) with some also on EU elections (Lodge and Sarikakis, 2013; (Vergeer, Hermans and Sams, 2011) & national elections within Europe (Plotkowiak and Stanoevska-Slabeva, 2013; Graham et al. 2013) with some transnational work (Hyun, 2013)
Often either quantitative surveys of frequency (Lamarre &Suzuki-Lambrecht, 2013) or studies of public response within very specific period (Anstead and O’Loughlin, 2011)
Has either a national or local focus, but rarely addresses tensions between the two
We chose to examine a period not occupied by an active election campaign, examining how the PR objective of creating, maintaining and enhancing relationships over the long term was addressed (L’Etang, 2004) and how local and national publics were being addressed
RQ1: Are politicians in our sample using Twitter to discuss & present their position on key political issues?
RQ2: How prolific are the tweeters in our sample and how does this relate to their political affiliation?
1/1/
14
1/2/
14
1/3/
14
1/4/
14
1/5/
14
1/6/
14
1/7/
14
1/8/
14
1/9/
14
1/10
/14
1/11
/14
1/12
/14
1/13
/14
1/14
/14
1/15
/14
1/16
/14
1/17
/14
1/18
/14
1/19
/14
1/20
/14
1/21
/14
1/22
/14
1/23
/14
1/24
/14
1/25
/14
1/26
/14
1/27
/14
1/28
/14
1/29
/14
1/30
/14
1/31
/14
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
AEAMBEEMJPLBLEMESRST
RQ3: What proportion of our research subjects’ tweeting is personal tweeting, and what topics are being covered?
RQ4: What local-national balance is present in the tweets?
National issue, national focus
Local issue, local focus
National issue, local focus
International issue, Int focus
International issue, nat focus
International issue, local focus
National issue, regional focus
Regional issue, regional focus
International issue, regional focus
Regional issue, local focus
0
500
1000
RQ5: How interactive are the research subjects in their tweeting?
27%
10%
48%
3%
0%
10%
1%
BroadcastMentionsRetweetRetweet with commentsRetweet with men-tionsReplyPublic reply
Twitter research & learning opportunities
OPPORTUNITIES
Allows students to practice research techniques, and critical evaluation, on material with which they are familiar and engaged
Consequently students are more likely to integrate this into their independent and self-directed learning
Relevance to a wide range of humanities, education and social science fields of study
CHALLENGES
Difficulties of accessing and storing ephemeral material
Referencing! The medium is not
the message Questions of scope:
managing a potentially large amount of data