global ccs institute - day 1 - panel 2 - ccs in developing countries
DESCRIPTION
Amit Kumar - TERITRANSCRIPT
PANEL 2 CCS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Tone Skogen – Government of Norway Alice Gibson – Global CCS Institute Dr Carlos Serralde – Mario Molina Centre Amit Kumar – TERI
CCS in India
Amit Kumar TERI, India
CCS in India
Amit Kumar TERI, India
Outline
• India’s energy scenario • Challenges • CCS economics • Barriers • Capacity development needs
India's energy scenario
Total primary energy supply mix in India
40%
24%
6%
1% 2%
27%
Coal Oil Natural gas Nuclear Hydro Biomass and waste
Energy supply
Coal – Major energy source, – 81% of total thermal generation
Electricity – Installed generating capacity ~ 207006.04 MW (CEA,
August 2012) – Suffering from huge shortages (2011-12)
• 8.5% energy shortage (likely to increase to 9.3% in 2012-13)
• 10.6% peak shortage Target: 15000 MW annually for next 7 years Captive power generation
– Currently 30,000 MW using fossil fuels
Sector wise energy consumption
48%
15%
13%
8%
9% 7%
Industry Transport Residential and Commercial Other energy users Non-energy users Agriculture
Sectoral break-up of India’s CO2 emissions
66%
27%
7%
Energy Industry LULUCF
Electricity fuel mix (As on August 31,2012)
137,936
4,780
39,291 24,998
207,006
34,444
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
Thermal Nuclear Hydro RES Total Captive
Break-up of emissions from energy sector
72%
14%
7% 7%
Electricity Transport Residental Others
Break-up of emissions from industrial sector
32%
2% 29%
7%
30%
Cement Ammonia Iron and steel
Food processing Others
India’s Projected CO2 emissions in 2031-32
Challenges
Concerns of:
Energy access
– Increasing energy supply for sustained economic growth
– Energizing rural areas
– Socio-economic development
Energy security
– Energy import vulnerabilities
Ensuring long-term sustainability of energy use
Climate change
Challenges
Poor electrification status
Over 289 million people without access to electricity (~ 74 million households)
Over 31,000 villages are yet to be electrified
Electricity supply situation is generally poor even in electrified villages
Over 80% of rural India dependent on traditional fuels for cooking
Challenges
Urban and peri-urban
Rapid pace of urbanisation
Use of commercial energy increasing rapidly in residential and commercial sectors
Electricity supply plagued with black-outs and brown-outs
Challenges
India’s energy demand is growing
Government’s endeavour for “Electricity for all by 2012”
Per capita electricity consumption: ~ 800 kWh/year
– World average: 2596 (2005)
– Target is to increase the availability to 1000 kWh/year by 2012.
Challenges
Total commercial energy consumption is estimated to increases from 284 mtoe in 2001 to 1727 mtoe in 2031
The import dependency in 2031 could reach
– Oil: 88%
– Coal: 72%
Challenges
Community services e.g. health, drinking water, education, and ICTs suffer due to lack of energy services
CCS in India
Levelized cost of electricity
Imported coal Indian Oil
LCOE without capture (Rs/kWh) 3.97 3.50
LCOE with capture (Rs/kWh) 5.52 4.90
LCOE with CCS (Rs/ kWh) 5.58 4.95
LCOE with CCS and monitoring (Rs/kWh) 5.61 4.99
Increase in LCOE due to CCS and monitoring 41% 42%
Barriers
CCS has not yet been proven to be a viable option for large scale GHG mitigation in the power sector.
India to consider it once large-scale deployment is taken place internationally.
One major barrier to CCS deployment in India is the lack of accurate geological storage site data.
The cost of electricity increases in CCS power plants while reducing net power output.
Barriers
CCS deployment is held to run counter to India’s ambitious goals for electrification, especially given the present electricity deficit and energy situation in the country.
As far as enhanced oil recovery (EOR) route of CCS is concerned, India does not have many depleted oil fields.
Requirement of specialised manpower and suitable infrastructure.
Monitoring of the stored CO2 to assure against leakage.
Legal issues related to land acquisition, ground water contamination, CO2 leakage, etc.
Objective
“To create an enabling environment for CCS deployment in India.”
Needs
Knowledge building and capacity development of policy makers and regulators
Capacity development on technical issues
Technology sharing and transfer
Capacity development of Financial Institutions
Public Engagement
Knowledge sharing
Knowledge building of policy makers and regulators
Some knowledge regarding CCS does exist at the decision-making levels.
However, there is a need to go deeper in to the nuances of different elements of CCS and the associated benefits and risks.
Global regulations and policies, along with progress in CCS related activities in other parts of the world, may be highlighted.
Needs
Knowledge building and capacity development of policy makers and regulators
Capacity development on technical issues
Technology sharing and transfer
Capacity development of Financial Institutions
Public Engagement
Knowledge sharing
Capacity development on technical issues
Assessment of potential storage sites is one of the biggest hurdles to CCS deployment in India.
This may be addressed by:
– Training of geologists in the advanced assessment techniques.
– Involvement of Indian agencies in the potential assessment work being carried out elsewhere.
Training in advanced drilling techniques.
Needs
Knowledge building and capacity development of policy makers and regulators
Capacity development on technical issues
Technology sharing and transfer
Capacity development of Financial Institutions
Public Engagement
Knowledge sharing
Technology sharing and transfer
Knowledge sharing is required to understand complete value chain of CCS.
The areas of include:
– Better process integration of different elements of CCS equipment
– Development of new adsorbents
– Conversion of CO2 to useful products
Needs
Knowledge building and capacity development of policy makers and regulators
Capacity development on technical issues
Technology sharing and transfer
Capacity development of Financial Institutions
Public Engagement
Knowledge sharing
Needs
Knowledge building and capacity development of policy makers and regulators
Capacity development on technical issues
Technology sharing and transfer
Capacity development of Financial Institutions
Public Engagement
Knowledge sharing
Capacity development of Financial Institutions
Norms and practices differ in CCS plants from those applied for normal power plants and industries.
Therefore, informing Indian financial institutions about global best practices may be a step forward.
Needs
Knowledge building and capacity development of policy makers and regulators
Capacity development on technical issues
Technology sharing and transfer
Capacity development of Financial Institutions
Public Engagement
Knowledge sharing
Public Engagement
Public acceptance is vital, especially on the storage side.
Inclusion of civil society groups in discussions related to CCS at an early stage may facilitate better acceptability of CCS technologies.
Needs
Knowledge building and capacity development of policy makers and regulators
Capacity development on technical issues
Technology sharing and transfer
Capacity development of Financial Institutions
Public Engagement
Knowledge sharing
Knowledge sharing among different CCS groups
CCS being a cross cutting activity involving several components, it is vital that knowledge sharing between the different CCS groups is done on a regular basis.
Web based `virtual’ platform could be one of the options for this.
Thank You ! www.teriin.org/[email protected]