global life cycle assessment

15
International Copper Association Global Life Cycle Assessment Oct 2011, Chicago Manfred Russ John Jewell

Upload: thinkstep

Post on 29-Mar-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

International Copper Association Global Life Cycle Assessment

TRANSCRIPT

International Copper Association Global Life Cycle Assessment

Oct 2011, Chicago

Manfred Russ John Jewell

2 10.10.2011

Global Copper Cathode LCA Copper association needs and benefits

International Copper Association (ICA) desired outcomes: Respond to market demand for life cycle information Provide robust data to stakeholders making material choices and the LCA community at large Harmonize copper industry’s efforts with other metal industry LCI work

Benefits to the ICA:

Better understanding of the environmental performance Promotion of continuous improvement Response to customer requests for environmental information Foundation to build “cradle-to-grave” profiles of copper-containing products Benchmark for ICA members

3 10.10.2011

LCA methodology for Copper LCA Scope of study

Goals

Creation of recent, high quality LCI for primary copper cathode at refinery gate

Results will be disclosed to the public as aggregated LCIs for public and commercial databases

No comparative assertions are disclosed to the public

Scope

“cradle-to-gate” life cycle inventory

Geographical scope: global

Technological scope: pyrometallurgical route / hydrometallurgical route

Temporal scope: reference period 2005-2009

4 10.10.2011

Summary of Participants Overview

5

10 companies with 35 sites

involved

5 10.10.2011

Summary of Participants Representativeness

5

Global primary cathode production – 15.3 thousand tonnes

Pyro – 12.3 k-tonnes Hydro – 3 k-tonnes

ICA study – 4.3 thousand tonnes Pyro – 3.3 k-tonnes Hydro – 1 k-tonne

Missing countries / regions with significant production:

China Russia India Indonesia Zambia

Missing countries had an accumulated annual production volume in 2007 of 4,650 ktonne, so their share on worldwide primary copper cathode production sums up to 30%

29% of Global production

6 10.10.2011

LCA methodology for Copper LCA Function and functional unit

Function

The system function is the production of primary copper cathode at the factory gate (minimum 99.99% purity level)

Generation of valuable co-products from the copper production system have been eliminated using allocation or avoided burden via system expansion

Functional unit Main functional unit

1000 kg of primary copper cathode at the factory gate

Intermediate functional unit

1000 kg of copper concentrate at the factory gate (29.6% copper content, based on the weighted average of the participants)

7 10.10.2011

LCA methodology for Copper LCA System boundaries

8 10.10.2011

LCA methodology for Copper LCA Treatment of co-products – co-products in the copper production system

9 10.10.2011

Data and Modelling Data limitations

Limitations of the study Topics to be evaluated in more detail as the science is available:

Water footprint

Land use

Biodiversity

Data needs for further elaboration and special focus in the future:

Use/treatment of waste

Tailings

Waste rock / Overburden

Toxicity

Metals in air and water

Related Impact categories (e.g. terrestric ecotoxicity, aquatic ecotoxicity, human toxicity)

10 10.10.2011

LCA results – Copper Cathode Impact assessment (CML 2001) split by scope

11 10.10.2011

LCA results – Copper Cathode Pyro route breakdown

12 10.10.2011

LCA results – Copper Cathode Hydro route breakdown

13 10.10.2011

LCA results – Copper Cathode Sensitivity Analyses

Sensitivity analyses:

Sulphuric acid – Market value vs. System expansion

Treatment of ore, concentrate and metal co-products with different approaches

Sensitivity on the results based on the share of the pyro- and hydro-route

The choice of H2SO4 treatment as co-product has the largest effect on results.

The other sensitivity analyses have no relevant influence on the overall results.

14 10.10.2011

Conclusions

Dominant production stage: Mining and Concentrate production are dominant contributors for PED, GWP, EP Smelting and Refining are dominant for AP, POCP, ODP

Electricity grid mixes:

Grid mix is a significant contributor for all impacts Differences between the applied grid mixes (Chile, Argentina, Mexico, US, Europe, Australia, Japan) are considerable.

Co-product – sulphuric acid:

Credit given to Pyro smelters producing surplus H2SO4 based on avoided virgin acid production. H2SO4 input to the hydro process is environmental burden free. Choice of treatment method (system expansion vs. credit for avoided production) is significant

Copper scrap:

Production of primary copper cathode includes copper scrap (secondary raw material). This results in reduced concentrate consumption is reduced along with those burdens. Secondary copper is useful as cooling scrap but is limited by availability of scrap