global standards management process (gsmp) 3rd quarter ...global standards management process (gsmp)...

Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 3rd quarter report 2016

October 2016 © 2016 GS1 AISBL of 17


An update on the previous quarters, key facts and figures.

Release 1.0, July – September 2016 (Q3)



Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 3

2 Standards and guidelines are created through the GSMP 4-Step Process. ..... 3

3 Standards delivered 2016 ............................................................................. 3 3.1 Standards delivered this quarter 1 July – 30 September 2016: ............................................. 3 3.2 Standards delivered in previous quarters of 2016 ................................................................ 4

3.2.1 The following standards were delivered 1 April – 30 June 2016: ................................... 4 3.2.2 The following standards were delivered 1 January – 31 March 2016: ............................. 5

4 Development work in process ...................................................................... 5

5 Work request activity ................................................................................... 5

6 Work request aging report ........................................................................... 7

7 Development work requests in assessment.................................................. 7

8 Standards Development Work Groups .......................................................... 7 8.1 Active Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs) .................................................................... 8 8.2 Active Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG) ..................................................................... 8

8.2.1 Mission-specific Work Groups closed year-to-date ....................................................... 8

9 Participation ................................................................................................. 8 9.1 GSMP membership .......................................................................................................... 9 9.2 Voting.......................................................................................................................... 10 9.3 Work request submitters ................................................................................................ 10 9.4 Event attendance .......................................................................................................... 10

10 Quality ....................................................................................................... 11 10.1 Due process ................................................................................................................. 11 10.2 Consensus .................................................................................................................... 11 10.3 Satisfaction survey results .............................................................................................. 11

10.3.1 GSMP member satisfaction survey .......................................................................... 11 10.3.2 GS1 Industry and Standards Event April 2016 satisfaction survey ............................... 12 10.3.3 GS1 Member Organisation satisfaction survey .......................................................... 12 10.3.4 Work order on-time performance ............................................................................ 13 10.3.5 Maintenance performance ...................................................................................... 13 10.3.6 Development on-time performance, year-to-date...................................................... 15

11 GSMP Governance Groups .......................................................................... 16 11.1 Board Committee for Standards (BCS) members ............................................................... 16 11.2 Industry Engagement Steering Committee (IESC) members ............................................... 16 11.3 Architecture Group (AG) members .................................................................................. 16

More information .............................................................................................. 17



1 Introduction The Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) is a community-based process for creating deliverables that serve the GS1® community.

The deliverables from GSMP are:

■ GS1 standards: documents that trading partners agree to follow in order to achieve interoperability goals. The rules that must be followed are called normative statements.

■ GS1 guidelines: non-normative documents that assist individual organisations in understanding and applying GS1 standards.

■ Collateral materials: other documents that provide an understanding of GS1 standards and GS1 guidelines and how to use them.

This report contains the standards and guideline development activity for the third quarter (Q3) of calendar year 2016.

2 Standards and guidelines are created through the GSMP 4-Step Process Figure 2-1 GSMP process

3 Standards delivered 2016

3.1 Standards delivered this quarter 1 July – 30 September 2016:

EPCIS & Core Business Vocabulary Standard

Updates to include a mechanism to correct errors and accommodate new visibility business scenarios in the EPCIS v1.2 and CBV v1.2 standards

General Specifications Standard:

1. Align Human Readable Interpretation information in sections 4 and 5 of the General Specification standard

2. An update to the GS1 Logistics Label Guideline

3. An update to include loyalty points associated with a coupon in the General Specification standard

4. Clarification in the General Specification standard on why the Serial Shipping Container Code (SSCC) should be used on cartons



5. Corrections to inconsistencies in the books and serial publication sections of the General Specification standard

6. Deprecate the terms VMN, VMN-12, VMN-13, Coupon-12, Coupon-13 in the General Specification standard

7. Improvements to the processing of data for GS1 Symbology in the General Specification

8. Provide a normative definition of the GS1 Company Prefix in the General Specification standard

Global Data Synchronisation (GDS) Package Measurement Rules Standard:

1. Clarify wording in sections 4 and 5 of the GDSN Packaging Measurement Rules standard

2. Clarify how to measure surface calculations of a cylindrical trade item

Global Product Classification Standard:

A bi-annual publication for the GPC standard, dated June 2016

GDSN Trade Item Implementation Guideline, Release 25.1

Implementation guidance on how use the class Trade Item Components and Component Information within GDSN

GS1 Trusted Source of Data (TSD) & TSD Product Data Modules

Align the B2C Trusted Source of Data standard with the current GS1 Data strategy

3.2 Standards delivered in previous quarters of 2016

3.2.1 The following standards were delivered 1 April – 30 June 2016:

Global Data Synchronisation Network (GDSN)® Standard: GDS Maintenance Release 3.1.2 (refer to standard for list of changes) Global Data Synchronisation (GDS) Package Measurement Rules Standard: Clarifications to remove ambiguity in the wording

General Specifications Standard:

1. A new guideline for the updated Global Location Number (GLN) Allocation Rules

2. Updates to prohibit the reassignment (reuse) of all GS1 keys for companies in the healthcare industry

3. Updates to the barcode production and quality assessment sections of the General Specification to reflect current practices

4. Updates to GLN in GS1 DataMatrix to identify wards and store rooms in hospitals

5. Updates to the GS1 DataMatrix Guideline to reflect the latest GS1 General Specification, GS1 branding, and corrected errors

6. A new Application Identifier for paperless coupons

7. The Global Trade Item Number (GTIN) ® Management Standard replaced the GTIN Allocation Rules. The GTIN Management Standard contains a simplified set of 10 rules and associated guiding principles that enable consistent decision-making for GTIN Management. (UniqueID)



Additional publications:

1. GS1 Architecture Principles, Release 3.0

2. 2016 GS1 System Architecture, Release 5.0

3. 2016 GS1 System Landscape, Release 5.0

3.2.2 The following standards were delivered 1 January – 31 March 2016:

Global Product Classification Standard: The biannual publication of the Global Product Classification Standard, Dec-2015

Global Data Synchronisation (GDS) Package Measurement Rules Standard:

1. More specific verbiage for performing conversion

2. Rounding of linear dimension values and clarifications for measuring hanging items in flexible packaging

Additional publications:

1. Gen2v2 Interoperability Test Requirements

2. GS1 General Specifications January Publication

4 Development work in process 1. Tagged Item Performance Protocol (TIPP) Standard (publication target October 2016)

2. Application Standard for Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Objects in Rail (publication target December 2016)

3. Global Product Classification Standard December Publication (publication target December 2016)

4. GS1 XML Maintenance Release 3.3 (publication target December 2016)

5. General Specification V17 (publication target January 2017)

6. Tag Data Standard (publication target March 2017)

7. ECL GPC 3.1.2.1 (publication target May 2017)

8. GDSN 3.1.3 Maintenance Release Suite of Standards (publication target May 2017)

9. GDSN Validation Rules (with GDSN Maintenance Release 3.1.3) (publication target May 2017)

10. EANCOM® 2002 Edition 2016 (publication target June 2017)

11. GS1 EDI XML maintenance release 3.3 (publication target 2017)

12. EPCIS & Core Business Vocabulary Implementation Guideline (being scoped)

13. High-speed Barcode Printing Standard (pending ratification)

Future work planned:

■ GS1 XML Maintenance Release 3.4

■ EANCOM Major Release

5 Work request activity Work requests (WR) are entered for new standards or modifications to existing standards.

■ 142 work requests were entered this quarter. Work request submissions are at an all-time high! With another quarter to go, submissions are already 23% over last year.

■ 89 work requests were closed this quarter

■ The highest volume Standards Maintenance Groups



Figure 5-1 Number of work requests submitted to the highest volume SMG’s year to date

Note, this section only includes the 4 most active SMG’s

Work Requests are classified and reported in several ways below:

Table 5-1 Work requests submitted for each standard Standard 2013 2014 2015 2016 ytd

Automatic Identification Data Capture (AIDC) * 47 26 27 23

EDI (Transactional Data) 39 27 37 115

Electronic Product Code (Tag Data Standard & UHF) 1 1 6 4

EPCIS & Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) 0 5 2 2

GDSN Package Measurement Rules 2 4 5 4

Global Data Synchronisation 80 118 217 197

Global Product Classification 30 28 77 117

Global Traceability Standard 2 0 5 0

GS1 Source (Trusted Source of Data) 1 3 1 1

Product Image Specification 3 9 3 8

Other (Process, SmartSearch, New Standard) 1 3 3 1

Total 206 224 383 472

Table 5-2 Work request submitted by category Category 2013 2014 2015 2016 ytd

In Assessment 4

Maintenance 193 209 368 462

Development 13 15 15 6

Total 206 224 383 472

EDI, 115

GMD, 206

GPC, 117

ID,24

48% Of all WRs are

submitted to GMD SMG



Table 5-3 Work requests submitted by region Region 2013 2014 2015 2016 ytd

Americas 92 89 175 128

Asia Pacific 14 14 10 6

Middle East & Africa 0 0 0 0

Europe 100 121 198 338

Total 206 224 383 472

Table 5-4 Work requests submitted by member type

Member type 2013 2014 2015 2016 ytd

Global Office 25 19 28 18

Member Organisation 121 154 229 324

Users 60 51 126 130

Total 206 224 383 472

6 Work request aging report The implementation of best-in-class improvements has resulted in a significant reduction of work requests in the system over the last 500 days. Work requests not actionable for standards development were either withdrawn, or sent back to the submitter as “not actionable for standards development”. 189 work requests remain open in GSMP as of 30 September 2016

Table 6-1 Overall aging report in days Days open = WR submission to end of quarter Under 100 100-200 200-500 Over 500 Total

GSMP Maintenance 96 48 38 1 183

GSMP Development 3 0 2 1 6

Total 99 48 40 2 189

7 Development work requests in assessment There are no development work requests in assessment at this time.

8 Standards Development Work Groups Standards Development (SD) Groups are responsible for GS1 system development including, developing GS1 standards, GS1 guidelines, and other deliverables that support their deployment. There are two kinds of SD work groups:

■ Standards Maintenance Groups (SMG): SMGs have an indefinite lifetime, are responsible for the on-going maintenance and enhancement of one or more existing GS1 standards or GS1 guidelines.

■ Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG): MSWGs are formed to do a specific piece of work as described in its charter, and which disbands when the work is complete. Mission-specific Work Groups are created for most work efforts of substantial scope.



Standards Development Work Group overview:

■ 5 Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs) are active; Barcodes and Traceability and Event Sharing SMG’s are not active at this time

■ 4 Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWGs) are active

8.1 Active Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs)

Table 8-1 Standards Maintenance Groups operating Group name Call to action date Group status

Barcodes 15 Apr 2010 Inactive

Data Accuracy 15 Apr 2010 Working

EDI 15 Apr 2010 Working

Global Master Data (GMD) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Global Product Classification (GPC) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Identification 15 Apr 2010 Working

Traceability and Event Sharing 26 May 2011 Inactive

8.2 Active Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG)

Table 8-2 Mission-specific Work Groups operating Group name Call to action date Group status

Application Standard for Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Objects in Rail

21 Feb 2016 Working , seeking members

EPC Information Service (EPCIS) 1.1 and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV)

10 Jun 2012 Working, needs end users

High-speed Barcode Printing 10 Mar 2016 Working

Tagged Item Performance Protocol (TIPP) 19 Feb 2015 Working, seeking companies

implementing RFID

8.2.1 Mission-specific Work Groups closed year-to-date

■ GSMP Mobile Scanning & Digital Shelf Identification (MDID) (formerly on hold). A version of this work was transferred to the UniqueID project (Q1)

■ GLN Allocation Rules MSWG, standard work is complete (Q2)

■ UniqueID—GTIN Management Rules, standard work is complete (Q2)

9 Participation Participants in GSMP are organisations (companies or other recognised entities); each organisation is represented by one or more individual persons belonging to that organisation. There is no limit to the number of individuals from a single organisation that may participate. Companies not a member of GS1 are non-voting. There are three types of participating members:

1. GSMP community member (non-voting)

□ Company has signed GS1 Intellectual Property (IP) Policy

□ Individual has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room

http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/community/working_groups/gsmp#BC



2. GSMP community member (voting)

□ Company is a member of GS1

□ Company has signed GS1 Intellectual Property (IP) Policy

□ Individual has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room

3. GSMP Work Group Member

□ Company has signed the GS1 IP Policy

□ Company has signed a group Opt-in Agreement

□ Member has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room

9.1 GSMP membership GSMP has 1440 individual members, a 12% increase this year. 81 members are non-voting. 936 are from user companies and 504 are from GS1 Member Organisations (MOs).

GSMP has 546 member companies, a 10% increase this year. 69 member companies are non-voting.

Table 9-1 Membership Growth 2013 2014 2015 2016 ytd

Individuals 955 1174 1281 1440

Companies 388 444 498 546

Table 9-2 Individual membership by interest Table 9-3 Member companies by interest category Interest category # of participants Interest category # of companies

Distributor/Group Purchasing 28 Distributer/Group

Purchasing 13

GS1 Member Organisation 504 GS1 Member Organisation 56

Manufacturer 313 Manufacturer 142

Other 157 Other 85

Retailer/Hospital 136 Retailer/Hospital 63

Solution Provider 302 Solution Provider 187

Total 1440 Total 546

Table 9-4 Member companies by region Region # of Companies

Asia Pacific 44

Europe 276

Middle East & Africa 11

The Americas 215

Total 546



9.2 Voting Each company/organisation can represent one vote in GSMP, regardless of the number of individuals voting. GSMP requirements and standards are approved by community eBallots. Each eBallot requires approximately 12 votes with additional minimum requirements of supply chain role votes (charter variations may apply).

The average number of votes per ballot (26) this quarter is 21, down from 23 in the second quarter. We expect the voting numbers decreased, due to summer holidays.

9.3 Work request submitters Figure 9-1 Top submitter organisations

9.4 Event attendance GS1 Global Office hosts two events every year for the GS1 community to collaborate face-to-face on industry needs and the development of GS1 standards. These events are:

■ GS1 Standards Event, held in the USA

■ GS1 Industry and Standards Event, held in Europe

The GS1 Industry and Standards Event took place 11-15 April 2016 in Jersey City, New Jersey, USA. Attending the event were 207 individuals representing 85 companies. Individual attendance increased by 6% compared to the previous event held in the United States.

Table 9-5 Event attendance by individual Individual type 2013

Dallas 2013 Lisbon

2014 Atlanta

2014 Rome

2015 Jersey City

2015 Warsaw

2016 Jersey City

Affiliate, Associates, Auto-ID Lab, other

15 19 12 24 5 19 5

Data Pool and Solution Provider 36 46 32 68 21 42 25

Distributor / Group Purchasing and Manufacturer

32 40 38 26 28 24 30

Global Office Staff 53 52 51 54 51 53 49

GS1 MO 95 140 82 136 84 126 82

Hospital / Retailer 12 11 11 21 6 15 16

Total 243 308 226 329 195 279 207

* 80% Of all WRs are

submitted by 10 organisations

Ytd WR Submitter Total

*

* *

*

* Top 5 MO submitters



Table 9-6 Event attendance by organisation By organisation 2013

Dallas 2013 Lisbon

2014 Atlanta

2014 Rome

2015 Jersey City

2015 Warsaw

2016 Jersey City

Affiliate, Associates, Auto-ID Lab, other

13 15 11 20 5 15 5

Data Pool and Solution Provider

30 38 21 46 19 32 18

Distributor / Group Purchasing and Manufacturer

24 26 20 22 19 16 24

Global Office staff 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

GS1 MO 25 31 25 32 22 30 24

Hospital and Retailer

8 7 8 13 5 10 13

Total 101 118 86 134 71 104 85

10 Quality The GSMP defines quality as the entire process employed to ensure that all GS1 standards are user-driven, globally applicable, royalty-free (to the best of our ability) and that ultimately meets the needs and requirements defined by its members.

10.1 Due process All GSMP groups are expected to follow the processes and procedures specified in the GSMP Manual. A community eBallot is used to confirm community consensus to progress a draft standard, or other GSMP deliverable.

10.2 Consensus Decision-making is achieved through consensus, which is defined as approval without sustained opposition. Voting options are yes, no and abstain.

Below are measures of due process and consensus in the GSMP:

1. Zero (0) due process infractions

2. 96% of eBallots approved this quarter were unanimous, consistent with last quarter.

3. 99% of votes cast were affirmative, consistent with last quarter.

10.3 Satisfaction survey results GS1 issues several surveys to measure satisfaction with GSMP. Survey results are structured in three categories:

■ unfavourable = sum of very dissatisfied and fairly dissatisfied

■ neutral

■ favourable = sum of satisfied and very satisfied.

Favourable and unfavourable answers are shown in percent using this structure: fav/unfav. Neutral answers are not used in reporting the survey results, they are viewed as opportunities to move a response to favourable. The results of the three surveys are detailed in the next three sections.

10.3.1 GSMP member satisfaction survey

GSMP favourable results increased across the board. Overall satisfaction with GSMP increased to 64% from 57%, with the largest increase in satisfaction with GSMP staff members to 80% from 66%.



Figure 10-1 GSMP member satisfaction survey results

Table 10-1 GSMP member satisfaction survey results; satisfaction overall, with the staff, and with the process

Questions 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

20122013% FAVS/UNFAVS

Overall satisfaction with GSMP n/a 66/10 57/7 57/13 64/8

Satisfaction with GSMP staff 80/1 84/6 73/4 66/9 81/2

Efficiency of process 49/15 44/19 39/14 43/17 50/8

10.3.2 GS1 Industry and Standards Event April 2016 satisfaction survey

Table 10-2 GS1 Event satisfaction survey results Programme activity 2013

Dallas 2013 Lisbon

2014 Atlanta

2014 Rome

2015 Jersey City

2015 Warsaw

2016 Jersey City

% FAVS/UNFAVS

Overall, how satisfied were you with the GS1 Standards Event?

83/3 94/3 84/9 87/5 93/2 93/1 98/2

How satisfied were you with the event facilities?

94/3 94/2 73/9 60/17 94/2 91/4 99/0

How satisfied were you with the week's agenda?

78/5 83/4 69/16 81/5 75/7 89/11 96/4

How satisfied were you with the Tuesday Plenary?

76/5 70/9 72/9 62/8 76/9 68/16 93/7

Average 83% 85% 75% 73% 85% 85% 96%

10.3.3 GS1 Member Organisation satisfaction survey

Favourable responses from GS1 Member Organisations increased to 73% from 64%; GSMP received no unfavourable responses from GS1 Member Organisation CEOs!

Figure 10-2 GSMP MO satisfaction survey results

5761

75

64

73

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016



Table 10-3 GS1 MO satisfaction survey results table

Questions % FAVS/UNFAVS

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Overall satisfaction with GSMP

57/5 61/1 75/2 64/1 73/0

10.3.4 Work order on-time performance

Work requests are the entry point into the GSMP process to request new standards or modify existing standards per the process and procedures laid out in the GSMP Manual. A Work request becomes a Work Order when it is approved for standards development. The time it takes for a Work Order to be processed in GSMP is measured below.

10.3.5 Maintenance performance

A Work Order is categorised as maintenance if it is a single, or a group of small changes to an existing standard or guideline, that can be developed in a Standards Maintenance Group. Examples: errata, new EDI code values, new symbol placement rules, GDSN Validation Rules.

There are two types of maintenance Work Orders:

■ Maintenance Type 1: Simple changes to a standard, considered on-time if it is completed within 180 days (10 day variance permitted)

■ Maintenance Type 2: Development time is expected to be longer than 180 days. These are considered on-time, if completed within 365 days (10 day variance).

Of the Maintenance Work Orders closing 1 July – 30 September 2016, 99% completed on time, consistent with the previous quarter results. The median days in development for SMG Work Orders opened and closed in 2016 for Q3 is 82 days.



Table 10-4 Maintenance on-time performance for Q3

Note: Maintenance on-time performance is measured from the submission date, to the GSMP complete date, and ready for ratification (if applicable). Maintenance on-time performance is measured from the submission date, to the GSMP complete date, and ready for ratification (if applicable).

Standards Maintenance Group (SMG)

Total WO closed in the SMG

Closed on time

Additional time

needed

% Closed on-time

Not completed: Solution exists/bundle/

withdrawn

EDI SMG (formerly eCom) 3 3 0 100% 0

GMD SMG 21 17 0 100% 4

GPC SMG 54 16 0 100% 38

ID & Barcodes SMG 23 12 2 86% 9

Total 100 47 2 99% 51

Figure 10-3 - EDI and GMD SMG’s performance year-to-date



Figure 10-4 GPC and ID SMG’s performance year-to-date

Legend for year All WR for year are closed WR are still open

for year

10.3.6 Development on-time performance, year-to-date

A Work Order is categorised as development if it involves creation of a new standard/guideline, or significant change to existing standard/guideline. Examples: extension to GDSN, a new EPCglobal High Frequency (HF) Air Interface Standard, enhancement to the EPCIS standard to include aggregation layers, a new barcode symbology, a new Business Message Standard. Development work is on-time, if the work is completed in, or under the estimated time to complete. The estimated completion date is defined in the project plan at the start of the development stage.

Table 10-5 Development on-time performance Number Topic Due date per

project plan Date completed On time

16-112 GTIN Management Rules standard (UniqueID)

June 2016 June 2016 Yes

Figure 10-5 Development projects overview

Legend:

on-target will not meet target

at risk completed

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

Target Date Steering Group Formation

Requirements Standard in Development

Collateral

Application Standard for MRO in Rail Dec 2016

Electronic Product Code Information Services (EPCIS) v1.2 Standard Sept 2016

High-Speed Barcode Printing (HSBP) Oct 2016

Tagged Item Performance Protocol (TIPP) Oct 2016

GSMP Strategic Projects



11 GSMP Governance Groups

11.1 Board Committee for Standards (BCS) members Lori Bigler, J.M. Smucker Co.

Elzbieta Halas, GS1 Poland

Bernie Hogan, GS1 US

Jean-Marc Klopfenstein, Nestlé

Miguel Lopera, GS1

Maria Palazzolo, GS1 Australia - Chairperson

Juan Antonio Sanfeliu, Manufacturas Antonio Gassol

Ulrich Schaefer, GS1 Germany

Art Smith, GS1 Canada

Wim van Herwijnen, METRO AG

Barron Witherspoon, Procter & Gamble Co.

Volker Zeiner, B. Braun

11.2 Industry Engagement Steering Committee (IESC) members Loek Boortman, GS1 Netherlands

Jeff Denton, Amerisource Bergen

Ruediger Hagedorn, Consumer Goods Forum

Cédric Lecolley, GS1 France

Ana Paula Maniero, GS1 Brazil

Steven Pereira, GS1 Australia

Halim Recham, GS1 Algeria

Erin Riggs, Procter & Gamble (CGF)

Mike Sadiwnyk, GS1 Canada

Virginia Vaamonde, GS1 Brazil

Carrie Wilkie, GS1 US

Joachim Wilkins, C&A Europe / RSC Commercial Services

Mike Yorwerth, Tesco Global

11.3 Architecture Group (AG) members Xavier Barras, GS1 France

Henri Barthel, GS1 GO – Co‐Chair

Robert Beideman, GS1 GO

Marc Cox, Philips

Kevin Dean, GS1 Canada

Ray Delnicki, GS1 US

Vera Feuerstein, Nestle – Co‐Chair

Andreas Fuessler, GS1 Germany

Mark Harrison, Milecastle Media

Dave Harty, Adents



Fred Kempkes, Unilever

Jens Kungl, Metro Group

Seán Lightholder, Walmart

Sean Lockhead, GS1 GO

Roberto Matsubayashi, GS1 Brasil

Staffan Olsson, GS1 Sweden

Paul Reid, GS1 UK

Pere Rosell, GS1 Spain

Sylvia Rubio Alegren, ICA

Sue Schmid, GS1 Australia – Co‐Chair

Eugen Sehorz, GS1 Austria

Gina Tomassi, Pepsico

Ken Traub, Ken Traub Consulting

Junyu Wang, Fudan Auto-ID Lab

Tony Zhang, FSEnet

More information Access this document and other GSMP reports at this website: http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/reports

Please contact Eileen Harpell with your questions or suggestions: [email protected]

http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/reports

http://intranet.gs1.org/gsmp/GSMP%20Reporting/Quarterly%20Reports/Q%202%202013/[email protected]

global standards management process (gsmp) 3rd quarter ...global standards management process (gsmp)...

Documents