gm-prs-0209 - accounting change ppt v1 (final) 062813 overview o… · kpmg international standards...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Insurance contractsOverview of IASB and FASB’s proposals on insurance
28 June 2013
KPMG International Standards Group
Agenda
Presenters/Administrative1
Overview of proposals2
1. Background and overview
2. Scope
3. Separating non-insurance components
4. Recognition
5. Measurement models
6. Reinsurance
7. Business combinations and portfolio transfers
8. Presentation
9. Disclosures
2© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Business Impacts3
Q&A4
10.Transition
2
Presenters
Vice-Chair KPMG Global Insurance Contracts Topic Team
Darryl Briley
Partner US DPP
Jennifer Austin
Canadian Member -KPMG Global Insurance Contracts Topic Team
Neil Parkinson
3© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Partner US DPP Topic Team
Canadian Insurance Sector Leader
Administrative
■ CPE regulations require that online participants take part in online questions
Must respond to a minimum of four questions per 50 minutes – for today’s webcast, you must answer 7 CPE questions to receive credit.
Polling questions will appear on your media player, and will be pushed out silently during today’s presentation
Results will be reviewed in the aggregate; no responses will be tracked back to any individual or organization
Do not view the presentation on slide show mode – polling questions will not appear
To ask a question, use the
4© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
“Ask a Question”icon on your media player.
Help Desk: 1-877-398-1471 or outside the United States at 1-954-969-3342
3
Insurance contracts project milestones
IASB final standard ?
IASB Targeted
Re-Exposure
Draft Effective dates ?
IASB Exposure
Draft
atio
ns
rati
on
s
2010 2011 to 1Q 2013
dates ?
FASB Discussion
Paper
June 2013
FASB Exposure
Draft
late 2014 or early 2015?
Red
elib
era
2H 2013to 2014
FASB final standard ?
2016
Jan 2015
Prepare for transition
Jan 2017
2017
Jan 2018
2015
Join
t d
elib
e
5© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
The effective date of the final IFRS standard will be approximately three years after the standard is issued. The IASB staff currently estimate that the issuance date will be late 2014 to early 2015. The IASB has stated that it expects the earliest possible effective date to be for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017.
The FASB decided not to include a minimum time period between the issuance of the standard and the effective date in its ED, but rather to ask a question about the key drivers affecting the timing of implementation.
Jan 2015 IFRS 9
Effective date
Jan 2017 earliest
effective date
Jan 2018 Potential
effective date
Measurement proposals
■ Treatment of
Background and overviewMajor changes since the 2010 proposals
■ IASB Re-exposure will include full text of proposed standard
■ Limited questions to avoid re-opening of issues
■ IASB does not intend to revisit ■ Treatment of contractual service margin (unlocking-IASB only)
■ Treatment of participating contracts
Approach to transition
■ Retrospective application if practical
Presentation proposals
■ Presentation of premiums, claims and expenses in profit & loss
FASB will have a full exposure draft
FASB intends to undertake fieldwork during the exposure period
■ IASB does not intend to revisit other aspects of proposed standard after re-exposure
■ IASB intends to undertake fieldwork during re-exposure
6© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
p
■ Estimate of margin on transition
p
■ Presentation of changes in discount rate in OCI
The comment period for the exposure drafts will end
25 October 2013.
4
Areas with significant changes Areas with significant clarifications
■ Scope of financial guarantees ■ Future cash flows
Background and overviewKey changes to 2010 proposals
■ Unbundling
■ Recognition
■ Contract boundaries
■ Acquisition costs
■ Premium-allocation approach (PAA)
■ Contractual service margin(IASB)/single margin(FASB)
■ Participating contracts
■ Discount rate
■ Risk adjustment
■ Investment contracts with a discretionary participation feature (DPF)
■ Presentation of statement of financial position
■ Premium-allocation approach (PAA)
■ Disclosures
7© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
■ Reinsurance
■ Use of OCI
■ Presentation of statement of comprehensive income
■ Transition
Background and overviewKey IASB and FASB differences
Scope - Investment contracts with DPF
Scope - Financial guarantee insurance (including mortgage)
Building block approach (BBA) 3 vs 4 building blocksBuilding block approach (BBA) 3 vs. 4 building blocks
Definition of a portfolio, unit of account for releasing margins
Acquisition costs – successful vs. unsuccessful
Mechanics for contract cash flows that vary with underlying items
Unlocking the residual margin vs. Locked – in single margin
8© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Premium allocation approach – permit vs. require
Reinsurance approach BBA vs. PAA– permit vs. require
Transition- practical expedients and re-designation of financial assets
5
Scope
In Scope Out of Scope
Contracts that an entity issues that transfer significant insurance risk, including:
Contracts that an entity issues that do not transfer significant insurance risk, including:
Financial Instruments issued by insurersContaining DPFs #
Financial Guarantee Contracts*
th t tlth t tl
Financial Instruments
Without DPFsService Contracts
Contracts specifically
excluded, e.g. certain fixed fee
service contracts
Financial Guarantee Contracts*
t tlt tl
9© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
*The FASB has decided on specific exceptions to the inclusion of financial guarantee contracts in the insurance contracts standard. #IASB only
…that are currently accounted for as insurance contracts#
…that are currently accounted for as insurance contracts#
…not currently accounted for as insurance contracts#
…not currently accounted for as insurance contracts#
Scope exceptions
■ Product warranties issued directly by a manufacturer, dealer or retailer;
■ Residual value guarantees provided by a manufacturer, dealer or retailer, as well as lessee’s residual value guarantee embedded in a finance lease;
The proposals would apply to all insurance contracts except:
value guarantee embedded in a finance lease;
■ Employers’ assets and liabilities under employee benefit plans and retirement benefit obligations reported by defined benefit retirement plans;
■ Contractual rights or contractual obligations that are contingent on future use of, or right to use, a non-financial item;
■ Contingent consideration payable or receivable in a business combination;
■ Direct insurance contracts that an entity holds, i.e. direct insurance contracts in which an entity is the policyholder. Does not apply to a reinsurance contract that an insurer holds;
■ Fixed-fee service contracts that have as their primary purpose the provision of services and meet
10© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
p y p p pcertain criteria's below;
Contracts are not priced based on an assessment of risk with individual customer
Contracts typically compensate customers by providing a service rather than cash
The type of risk transferred are primarily related the use (or frequency) of services
6
Distinct goods
and services
Embedded
Separating non-insurance components
■ The separation of certain components from an insurance contract (‘unbundling’) would be required. Unbundling prohibited
derivatives (not closely related)
Distinct investment
components
Non-distinct investment component
Insurance component
q g pif not required.
■ Guidance on closely related embedded derivatives, distinct investment components and distinct goods and services is provided
11© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Measured under the insurance standard
Measured under the insurance standard, but excluded from the aggregate premium
Measured under the financial instrument standard
Measured under the revenue recognition standard
Recognition
■ An insurance contract would be recognized from the earliest of:
the beginning of the coverage period;
the date on which the first payment from the policyholder becomes due #; and
if applicable, the date on which facts and circumstances indicate that the portfolio of insurance
Onerous contract
considerationBound by terms of Coverage begins =
Recognize
pp pcontracts to which the contract belongs is onerous.
■ In the absence of a contractual due date, the first payment from the policyholder would be deemed to be due once it has been received.
12© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
1 January1 November
Bound by terms of contract
Coverage begins = premium due
# IASB only
7
Proposed measurement modelsThe building-block model
Four building blocks – IASB preference Three building blocks – FASB preference
Expected future cash flows
Explicit unbiased and probability-weighted estimates of future cash outflows less future cash inflowsExplicit, unbiased and probability-weighted estimates of future cash outflows less future cash inflows
Time value of money
Discounted using current rates to reflect the time value of money
Risk adjustment
To adjust for the effects of uncertainty about the amount and timing of future cash flows
Single margin
To remove any profit at inception. Released over coverage and claims handling period. Interest accreted on the single margin.
Contractual service margin
To remove any profit at inception. Released over coverage period. Interest accreted on the contractual
13© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
service margin.
An insurer would measure the present value of the fulfilment cash flows excluding the risk adjustment at the portfolio level of aggregation for insurance contracts.
Proposed measurement modelsFundamentals
Level of measurement
No level of measurement prescribed for the risk adjustment.
IASB- unit of account used to determine the contractual service margin should be at portfolio l l U it f t d t l t ib d b t i t t ith th bj ti f
IASB - contracts that are subject to similar risks and priced similarly relative to the risk taken on and managed together as a single pool.
FASB - contracts that are subject to similar risks and priced similarly relative to the risk taken on and have a similar duration and similar expected patterns of release of the single margin.
Portfolio
14© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
level. Unit of account used to release not prescribed but consistent with the objective of release.
FASB- unit of account to determine and release the single margin is at portfolio level.
Margins
8
■ Be explicit (i.e. separate from estimates of discount rates that adjust for the time value of money and the risk adjustment)
Proposed measurement modelsBuilding block 1 – Cash flows
Estimates of cash flows would include all cash inflows and outflows related directly to the fulfilment of the portfolio of contracts the contract belongs to and would:
■ Reflect the perspective of the entity (market variables would be consistent with observable market prices)
■ Incorporate, in an unbiased way, all available information that relates to the cash flows of the contract
■ Be current and consistent with market prices, i.e. use of estimates of financial market variables such as interest rates
■ Include only cash flows arising from existing contracts within the contracts’ boundaries
15© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Estimates of cash flows would be updated each reporting period and measured at a portfolio level of aggregation for insurance contracts.
Insurance liability under the building –block approach and the onerous contract liability under premium allocation approach reflects estimates of cash flows at the reporting date.
Proposed measurement modelsBuilding block 1 – Acquisition costs
Acquisition costs to be included in the initial measurement of a portfolio of insurance contracts should be all the direct costs that the insurer will incur in acquiring the contracts in the portfolio.
Acquisition costs incurred before a contract’s coverage period begins should be
Measurement would exclude indirect costs including:
■ rent and occupancy
■ software dedicated to contract acquisition
■ equipment maintenance and depreciation
■ agent and sales staff recruiting and training
■ administration
■ advertising
■ utilities
■ other general overhead
g grecognized as part of the insurance contracts liability for the portfolio of contracts.
16© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
FASB only - limited to those costs related to successful acquisition efforts
IASB only - no distinction between successful and unsuccessful efforts (all
direct costs included)
FASB lines up with current U.S. GAAP other than eliminating direct response advertising and the transition expedient in ASU 2010-26
9
Example bottom-up and top-down approach
Either a top-down or a
Financial instrument yield of 5.25% (based on actual assets held or a reference portfolio)
Proposed measurement modelsBuilding block 2 – Time value of money
Either a top down or a bottom-up approach may be used to determine an appropriate discount rate.
■ In theory, both approaches should result in the same discount rate, however in practice, differences are expected.
■ The top-down approach may result in a higher rate, as illustrated.
Market risk premium expected losses (1%)
Market risk premium for unexpected losses (.5%)
Difference between top-down and bottom up approach (.25%)
Liquidity premium (.5%)
Risk-free rate 3%
Top-down approach:
3.75%
Bottom-up approach:
3.50%
17© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Risk free rate 3%
■ No specific method prescribed.
■ Regardless of the approach used, the discount rate should be consistent with the characteristics of the insurance contract liability, e.g. timing, currency and liquidity.
Proposed measurement modelsBuilding block 2 – Use of OCI to present changes in discount rates
Present in OCI Present in profit or loss
Cumulative OCI
Difference between liability discounted at the current rate and the liability discounted at the (locked-in) rate at Interest expense at ‘locked-in’ rateand the liability discounted at the (locked-in) rate at inception
Current period OCI
Equals interest expense at current rate less interest expense at ‘locked-in’ rate
Changes in interest sensitive cash flow assumptions (e.g. minimum interest guarantees and lapse rates)(a)
Interest expense at locked-in rate
Note: (a)Unless offset against an unlocked contractual service margin
Key attributes
18© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
■ The use of OCI to present the effect of discount rate changes would be required (rather than permitted)
■ No loss recognition test
■ To recognise the effect of changes in cash flow assumptions in profit or loss using the ‘locked-in’ rate
10
Amortized Cost FV-OCI FV-Profit or Loss
Business model assessment
Proposed measurement modelsBuilding block 2 – interaction with the financial instruments proposals
Held and managed within a business model whose objective is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows
Held within a business model whose objective is both to hold the assets to collect contractual cash flows and to sell the assets
Residual category (i.e., all other assets and includes assets that do not meet the SPPI test as well as those that are held for sale)
19© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Proposed measurement modelsBuilding block 3 – Risk adjustment (IASB only)
■ If there are techniques that could represent faithfully the risk inherent in the insurance obligations, then the inclusion of an explicit risk adjustment would provide relevant information to users. Under the IASB’s approach, the measurement of an insurance contract should contain an explicit risk adjustment.
■ IASB has not prescribed a unit of account for measurement of the risk adjustment.
Risk Adjustment: “The compensation the insurer requires for bearing the uncertainty about the amount and timing of the cash flows that arise as the entity fulfils the insurance contract”
■ If there are techniques that could represent faithfully the risk inherent in the insurance obligations, then the inclusion of an explicit risk adjustment would provide relevant information to users. Under the IASB’s approach, the measurement of an insurance contract should contain an explicit risk adjustment.
■ IASB has not prescribed a unit of account for measurement of the risk adjustment.
■ The IASB would not limit the range of available techniques and related inputs to the risk adjustment.
■ However, if a technique other than confidence level is used, that technique and the equivalent confidence level % is to be disclosed.
■ Re-measured each reporting period and changes are recognized in profit or loss.
20© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
p g p g g p
■ Replicating asset approach based on the fair value of the replicating asset may be appropriate.
■ Level of measurement is not prescribed as long as measurement meets objective.
11
Contractual service margin (IASB) Single margin (FASB)
Proposed measurement modelsBuilding block 4 – Contractual service margin (IASB only)
■ Arises when the present value of the fulfilment cash flows * is less than zero (i.e. remove day-one gains)
■ Prospectively adjusted for changes in the estimates of cash flows relating to future coverage or other future services; cannot become negative in subsequent measurement (unlocking)
■ Systematic release over coverage period based on the pattern of transfer of services provided
■ The single margin would not be re-measured subsequently (no unlocking)
■ Recognises profit as the entity satisfies its performance obligation to the policyholder (i.e. released from exposure to risk as evidenced by a reduction in the variability of cash outflows)
■ Separate presentation in statement of financial
■ If the present value of fulfilment cash flows is positive, recognise a loss in profit or loss at inception
21© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
■ Classified as part of the insurance liability
■ Interest accretion using discount rate at inception
■ Separate presentation in statement of financial position
■ Interest accretion using discount rate at inception
* defined as the expected present value of the future cash outflows less cash inflows plus risk adjustment
Contracts that specify a link to underlying items that the entity is required to hold
Proposed measurement modelsThe mirroring exception
The measurement for these contracts can be illustrated as follows:
Cash flows vary directly with underlying items
Cash flows vary indirectlywith underlying items
Cash flows do not vary with underlying items
Measurement:mirrors underlying items, i.e.
Amortized cost, FVTPL, FVOCI
Measurement:risk-adjusted expected present value of cash flows
Contracts that do not specify a link to underlying items that an entity is required to hold (i.e. universal life, index-linked products or other types of contracts in which the participation features are discretionary) would be measured under the
22© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
p yp p p y)building-block approach.
FASB: The mirroring exception would not apply to situations in which 1) the policyholder’s participation is determined on a basis other than that used to measure the underlying item in the GAAP F/S and does not reflect a timing difference or 2) cash flows for which the entity has the discretion on the amounts relating to the policyholder participation. Additionally, when an entity expects changes to the crediting rates, reset rates in a manner that recognises changes in estimated interest crediting and related ultimate cash flows on a level-yield basis over the life of the contract.
12
■ Simplified measurement approach for some short-duration contracts and similar approach to current practices for non-life contracts.
■ Consistent with revenue recognition proposals.
■ Intended to be proxy for building blocks and permitted (IASB only), if:
Proposed measurement modelsThe premium-allocation approach
Liability for incurred claims
measured under the
BBA
Onerous contract liability
measured under BBA, if
applicableBBAPAA
All three components
measured under one
the coverage period at initial recognition is one year or less; or
Produces measurements that are a reasonable approximation to those of the BBA – i.e. at inception, the entity expects no significant variability in the fulfilment cash flows.
23© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Liability for the remaining coverage,
measured by reference to
unearned premium
under one approach
FASB: PAA would be required, if the insurance contract is one year or less; or it is unlikely that there will be significant variability in the expected value of net cash flows required to fulfil a contract before a claim is incurred.
Initial premium
Onerous contract liability
Pre claims liability at inception
Directly attributable acquisition costs- -=
Proposed measurement modelsThe premium-allocation approach
Initial measurement- Liability for remaining coverage
p
■ Similar in many ways to current practice for non-life contracts
■ Discounting required if there is a significant financing component using discount rate at inception
■ Directly attributable acquisition costs can be expensed if coverage period is less than 1 year
■ Released on a systematic basis representing the transfer of services
■ Onerous contract test when facts and circumstances indicate it might be onerous
24© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Interest accretion
Change in onerous
contract liability
Previous carrying amount
Premium received in
period+
+ Revenue recognized for
coverage
--
Subsequent measurement- Liability for remaining coverage
13
Proposed measurement modelsThe premium-allocation approach
Fulfilment cash flows
Liability for claims incurred under the PAA is measured at the fulfilment cash flows
■ When a liability for incurred claims is discounted - use the discount rate at the inception of the contract to determine the amount of the claims and interest expense in profit and loss.
■ Discounting not needed if cash flows are expected to be paid or received in one year less
Unbiased probability-weighted current estimates of future cash
flows1 Discounted at current rates to reflect the time value of money 2
25© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
less
3 Risk adjustment (IASB only)
Evaluate the applicable approach in same manner as a direct contract
ReinsuranceReinsurance assumed
Eligibility Principle *
Contracts eligible if the PAA would produce measurements that are a
reasonable approximation of building-block approach.
Eligibility Criteria *
Apply the BBA rather than the PAA if at contract inception:
IASB -Permit FASB - Require
it is likely that there will be significant ariabilit in the
26© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
* A contract would qualify automatically under both approaches if coverage period is one year of less
significant variability in the expected value of net cash
flows required to fulfil a contract before a claim is
incurred.
14
Direct contract
Premium allocation approach (PAA)
Building block approach (BBA)
ReinsuranceReinsurance ceded
Reinsurance ceded Reinsurance cededFASB requires symmetrical approach
PAA
27© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Reinsurance ceded (BBA)
PAA permitted if proxy for
BBA
IASB allows for either approach regardless of direct contract
Present value of fulfilment cash flows > Zero Present value of fulfilment cash flows < Zero
Input Measurement Input Measurement
Reinsurance premium paid (premium ceded to reinsurer – lump sum paid up-front)
(70)Reinsurance premium paid (premium ceded to reinsurer – lump sum paid up-front)
(100)
Measurement example for BBA at initial recognition
ReinsuranceReinsurance ceded example
p p p ) p p p )
Ceding commission received 7 Ceding commission received 7
Reinsurance recoverable cash inflows (after allowance for expected credit losses)
80Reinsurance recoverable cash inflows (after allowance for expected credit losses)
80
Discounting (15) Discounting (15)
Risk adjustment 10 Risk adjustment 10
Contractual service margin/liability (12)Expense at inception1; or
(Debit) contractual service margin/asset218
28© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
1. Loss at inception when the coverage period is for past events, i.e. retroactive reinsurance.
2. Reinsurance asset, such as prepaid premium, when the reinsurance contract is for future events.
FASB: No risk adjustment would be included; the remaining single margin on reinsurance contracts that provide coverage for future events would be recognized consistently with the margin on underlying contracts covered by the contract
15
Contracts acquired in a business combination or portfolio transfer would be recognized at the date of the business combination or portfolio transfer
Recognition
Business combinations and portfolio transfers
Consideration received > PVFC PVFC > consideration received
Recognize the difference as an
The consideration received for insurance contracts acquired would be treated as a pre-coverage cash flow.
An entity would determine the expected present value of the fulfillment cash flows and compare that amount with the consideration received for those contracts, after adjusting the consideration for any other assets and liabilities acquired in the same transaction
Measurement
29© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Business combinations
Recognize the difference as contractual service margin
Recognize the difference as an adjustment to the initial measurement of a gain or goodwill #
Portfolio transfersRecognize the difference as contractual service margin
Recognize the difference as a loss
FASB: Difference would be recognized as a loss #
■ An entity would present separately:
portfolios of insurance contracts that are in an asset position; and
tf li f i t t th t i li bilit iti
PresentationStatement of financial position
portfolios of insurance contracts that are in a liability position
■ Reinsurance contract assets from insurance contract liabilities
■ General IAS 1 presentation requirements would apply
■ FASB proposals also include separate presentation of:
building-block and premium-allocation approaches
further disaggregation of insurance contract assets and liabilities
30© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
ab es
separate presentation of any unconditional right to premiums
BBA - premium receivable and single margin (includes acquisition costs expected to be paid)
PAA - premium receivable and liability for remaining coverage
16
PresentationPresentation of the statement of profit or loss and OCI
zeroContractual service (or
Initial recognition:
Building block 1 Building block 2 Building block 3 # Building block 4
Expected cash outflows
Discounting Risk adjustment
service (or single) margin
Expected cashinflows
Presentation of changes in profit or loss and OCI (# IASB only):
Changes in cash flows unrelated to
Recognized in profit or loss if no contractual service margin
Release of margin: Unwind of locked-in discount rate:
31© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Changes in cash flows related to past and current services:
profit or loss
Offset changes related to future
services #
gservices: profit or loss Changes in risk
adjustment:profit or loss #
gprofit or loss
in discount rate: profit or loss
Changes in discount rate:
OCI
Changes in cash flows related to future services: Offset against the margin * #
PresentationPresentation of the statement of profit or loss and OCI
■ IAS 1 applies: presentation of revenue, claims incurred, interest based on locked-in discount rate
■ FASB requires disaggregation of PAA and BBA, ceded balances, and interest accretion
Present of profit or loss and OCI
Mirroring exception to presentation of changes
■ “Mirrored” cash flows align with underlying item
■ All changes in value of cash flows that vary indirectly with underlying items presented in profit or loss
■ Discount rate used to measure interest expense in profit or loss is updated when the entity expects
32© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
■ Discount rate used to measure interest expense in profit or loss is updated when the entity expects changes in returns on underlying items to affect the amount of cash flows to the policyholder. That rate is either at contract inception or when the rate is updated (IASB only)
■ When an entity expects changes to the crediting rates, reset in a manner that recognizes changes in estimated interest crediting and related ultimate cash flows on a level-yield basis over the life of the contract. (FASB only)
17
PresentationPresentation of the statement of profit or loss and OCI
Earned premium presentation (an example)
Insurance contract revenue 475
Insurance contract revenue
■ Premiums are allocated to periods in proportion to the value of coverage (and other services) by reference to the
Claims and benefits incurred -320
Expenses incurred -60
Amortisation of acquisition costs -20
Changes in estimates of future cash flows(if not offset against the contractual service margin)
-10
Unwind of previous changes in estimates 5
Underwriting result (Gross margin) 70
Investment income 60
Interest on insurance liability -54
(and other services) by reference to the estimated pattern of expected claims and expenses.
■ Allocated premiums exclude the present value of the amounts to be paid to policyholders regardless of whether an insured event occurs(‘the investment component’)
33© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
y
Profit or loss 76
Other comprehensive income:
Change in insurance contract liability due to changes in discount rate
9
Fair value movements on FVOCI assets -10
Total comprehensive income 75
PresentationPresentation of the statement of profit or loss and OCI
Expected cash flows Year 1 Year 2
Premiums received 420 400
Assumptions
■ Portfolio of 2-year contracts incepted at
Simplified example of insurance contract revenue presentation
Expected claims and benefits -200 -350
Fulfillment cash flows 220 50
Release of risk adjustment (IASB only) 32 30
Release of contractual service margin/single margin
23 19
Presentation Year 1 Year 2
Insurance contract revenue* 255 399
the beginning of period 1
■ Time value of money immaterial
■ No investment component, acquisition costs, expenses, changes in estimates or experience adjustments, losses on initial recognition
■ All claims and benefits paid immediately
■ Expected cash flows, risk adjustment and margin release pattern as presented in
34© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Actual claims and benefits (amounts incurred)
-200 -350
Underwriting margin 55 49
margin release pattern as presented in table to the right
* Insurance contract revenue is the sum of expected claims and benefits, change in risk adjustment and release of contractual service margin/single margins
18
DisclosuresNew disclosures
Amounts recognized in financial statements
Significant judgements Nature and extent of risks
Additional disclosure requirements include:
Additional reconciliations as a result of the new measurement model in tabular format, including components of changes.
Reconciliation from premiums received to revenue.
Inputs used to determine revenue recognized in the period
More detailed disclosures of methods and processes for estimating inputs.
Effect of changes in the methods and inputs, including explanations for the reasons for changes.
Disclosure of confidence level to which the risk adjustment corresponds.
Quantitative information about effect on profit or loss and equity of contracts’ sensitivities to insurance risk.
Reconciliation of disclosures about claims development with the carrying amounts of the insurance liabilities .
For liquidity risk, the
35© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Effect of the insurance contracts initially recognized in the period.
Additional transition disclosures.
Disclosure of the yield curve used to discount cash flows that do not depend on returns from underlying items.
amounts payable on demand, in a way that highlights the relationship between these amounts and the carrying amounts of the related contracts.
Retrospective application Limited ability to redesignatesome financial assets
■ Includes margin for in-force contracts at ■ Re-designations under the fair value
TransitionOverview
date of transition
■ Full retrospective application
■ Practical expedients provided for determination of contractual service/single margins and discount rate if retrospective application is impracticable
■ Additional guidance for determining
option permitted to eliminate or significantly reduce accounting mismatches
■ Election of OCI category for investments in certain equity instruments permitted
■ FASB proposals would allow financial assets that relate to insurance business to be re-designated under
36© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
■ Additional guidance for determining locked-in discount rate to adjust AOCI at date of inception and subsequent interest expense in profit or loss if cant be determined retrospectively
business to be re designated under the relevant financial instruments guidance in effect as if the insurer had adopted that guidance on transition.
Early adoption permitted (IASB only)
19
TransitionEstimating the contractual service margin at transition
Estimate what the margin would have been if the insurer had been able to apply the new standard retrospectively.
When retrospective application is impracticable, an insurer would estimate the contractual service margin by maximizing the use of objective data, i.e. an insurer would not calibrate the residual margin to the insurance liability as it was measured using previous GAAP. (IASB only)
What practical expedient would be used residual margin to the insurance liability as it was measured using previous GAAP. (IASB only)
An insurer would determine the contractual service margin on transition assuming all changes in estimates of cash flows between initial recognition and the beginning of the earliest period presented were known at initial recognition. (IASB only)
If no objective information to retrospectively adopt, estimate margin to zero (FASB only)
Practical expedient to determine the margin based on an insurer’s existing definition of a portfolio and allocate that margin to the “new portfolios” on transition (FASB only).
would be used to determine the contractual service/single margin?
The discount rate used is a key determinant of the margin established at transition and amounts would be recognized in OCI and the interest expense recorded in profit or loss
37© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
amounts would be recognized in OCI and the interest expense recorded in profit or loss.
Insurers may find it difficult to determine the discount rate in the retrospective period using either the top-down or bottom-up approaches.
Practical expedient when determining the discount rate would otherwise be impracticable for contracts written prior to transition.
What discount rate would be used?
Business impactsHow will the proposals affect your organization?
Operational performance
People and processesperformance
Product design and pricing and asset- liability management
processes
Data and systems
38© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Possible volatility in equity and profit or loss
Capital management
20
Business impactsChanges to asset liability management
Increased volatility possible in profit or loss and equity
Impacts on asset-liability management and financial instruments accounting
Volatility may increase because current information and assumptions would be
Effective date of financial instrument proposals may precede effective dateinformation and assumptions would be
used in measuring insurance liabilities.
Applying the new financial instruments proposals may mitigate or increase volatility.
The degree of volatility would depend on how insurance liabilities and financial assets are measured under current and proposed requirements.
Discounting insurance liabilities would be a big change for many property and casualty insurers.
proposals may precede effective date of the insurance proposals.
Interaction with future financial instruments models may impact investment allocations and asset-liability management.
Entities would have limited ability to re-designate some financial assets on initial application.
Accounting mismatches may result if:
changes in conditions have offsetting effects on the economic
39© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
offsetting effects on the economic values of assets and liabilities; but
gains and losses are not recognized symmetrically.
Business impactsChanges to operating performance
Measurement and reporting of operational performance
Broad business impacts
Proposed measurement model changes how insurance liabilities are presented
May change decisions on product profile and features, or product pricing.
Growing businesses may see negative impacthow insurance liabilities are presented and consequently operating performance.
Presentation and disclosure proposals are expected to change the communication of performance because:
performance metrics would be less familiar;
multi-line business may be more complex to explain;
reporting processes may take longer;
GAAP b d t
Growing businesses may see negative impact on results if earnings patterns become more back-ended on long duration contracts.
More volatile products may become less desirable – e.g. long-duration insurance products with guarantees.
New reporting basis may have tax implications in some jurisdictions.
Capital management and interaction with regulatory capital requirements in some
jurisdictions
I d l tilit i t d it
40© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
non-GAAP measures may be used to explain financial performance; and
IFRS vs. US GAAP differences may need to be considered.
Increased volatility in reported equity may impact capital positions.
Insurers would need to incorporate accounting change into planning for solvency and regulatory reporting.
Analysts, investors and shareholders may need time to understand the new reporting.
21
Business impactsPeople impacts
Significant impacts on people
■ Compensation arrangements and performance targets may be changed.
■ Additional resources may be needed to manage transition.
■ Actuarial and accounting resources will be in high demand.
■ IT resources will be needed to address changing actuarial valuations and systems developments.
■ Some resource gaps may be addressed by additional hiring, outsourcing to third parties,
41© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
internal training, and redeploying existing resources within the organization.
Next steps – Insurance Contracts
Accounting, tax and reporting
■ Perform a comprehensive review of insurance contracts to assess how they would be measured under the BBA or PAA.
■ Consider how best to communicate performance, due to less familiar performance metrics and presentation and duration of reporting processes.
■ Evaluate need to supplement disclosures and use non-GAAP measures.
■ Assess possible alignment with solvency and regulatory reporting.
■ Identify magnitude of any impact on regulatory capital requirements.
■ Assess impact on the taxation treatment of insurance contracts.
■ Identify sources contributing to volatility of financial results under new model
42© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
new model.
■ Assess interaction with application of financial instruments proposals and identify possible accounting mismatches.
■ Identify possible impacts arising from the revenue recognition proposals – e.g. for unbundling components of unit-linked contracts.
■ Assess impacts on separate entity reporting.
■ Update accounting and reporting manuals.
22
Next steps – Insurance Contracts
Systems and processes
■ Upgrade accounting systems to ensure that they can handle new requirements.
■ Upgrade actuarial modeling capabilities, and valuation and financial reporting systems.
■ Evaluate data collection needs and co-ordinate significant actuarial and finance involvement.
■ Identify processes affected by the proposals and establish processes for:
evaluating contract classification and unbundling requirements;
calculating insurance contract liabilities, including determining the discount rate, risk adjustment and contractual service margin; and
43© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
disclosures.
■ Evaluate changes needed to key internal controls over financial and regulatory reporting.
■ Consider the need to outsource processes.
■ Consider implementation of revised IT strategy.
■ Develop a transition plan for parallel runs and dual reporting.
Next steps – Insurance Contracts
Business
■ Review product profile and consider changes to product design and pricing.design and pricing.
■ Revisit investment allocations and asset-liability management.
■ Consider entering into reinsurance and outsourcing arrangements.
■ Assess impacts on key performance metrics.
■ Budget for necessary changes to people, processes and systems.
■ Assess impact on general business issues such as contractual terms, treasury practices, and risk management practices.
44© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
23
Next steps – Insurance Contracts
People and change
■ Determine staff needs – in particular, actuarial, IT and finance resources.finance resources.
■ Train finance and actuarial teams, as well as IT, underwriting, risk management and investor relations.
■ Evaluate impact on compensation arrangements and performance targets and measures.
■ Communicate changes for stakeholders to understand new metrics and performance results.
■ Assess how changes to processes may impact how work is performed – in particular, for actuaries and risk managers.
45© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Questions ?
46© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
24
© 2013 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firmsof the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMGInternational provides no client services
kpmg.com/socialmedia
International provides no client services.
The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.