gmc conference workshop: professionalism post francis and berwick
DESCRIPTION
Our first annual conference in Manchester brought together doctors, medical students and patient groups to consider and debate the challenges affecting medical professionalism in the 21st century. This workshop explored different themes around professionalism. It featured a panel consisting of Professor Mike Pringle, President RCGP; Nigel Acheson, Regional Medical Director (South NHS England); Professor Wendy Reid, Medical Director Health Education England; Maureen Edmondson, Chair of the Patient and Client Council for Northern Ireland and Niall Dickson, Chief Executive and Registrar of the GMC,TRANSCRIPT
Medical Professionalism – whose job is it anyway?
Introducing our panel
Professor Mike Pringle – President, Royal College of General Practitioners
Nigel Acheson – Regional Medical Director (South), NHS England
Professor Wendy Reid – Medical Director at Health Education England
Maureen Edmondson – Chair of the Patient and Client Council for Northern Ireland
Niall Dickson – Chief Executive and Registrar, General Medical Council
Setting the scene: who’s in the room?
1. Student
2. Educator
3. Doctor
4. Patient
5. Employer
6. Professional body
7. Other
Place in order of importance these levers to improve/enable professionalism?
Education and training
More regulation / legal powers
Organisational culture and leadership
Greater patient involvement in care and care
design
More resources
Theme 1 – Accountability or Improvement?
Francis
• Fundamental standards
• Legal duty of candour• Criminal sanctions• Regulation• Healthcare
leadership• Authoritative
information
Berwick
• Ethic of learning• Patients and carers
involved at all levels• Quality and patient
safety sciences• Regulation to be
sensitive• Recourse to sanctions
rare
Time to vote: Accountability or Improvement?
1. Francis……..accountability
2. Berwick ……improvement
Theme 2 – Raising Concerns
‘(We)…..should not seem over-anxious to be at work since the spreading abroad of the shortcomings of any erring members of our honourable profession is a proceeding to be carefully restrained within precise limit.’
‘The system for the investigation … has not proved capable of reconciling the diverse objectives that have to be achieved. X not unreasonably felt that he had to take his complaint outside ‘the system’’.
‘A combination of inadequate systems and poor culture meant that staff were not encouraged to … speak openly. Those who tried to raise concerns found it hard to have their voices heard.’
‘Staff witnesses described an atmosphere of fear … and a forceful style of management (perceived by some as bullying). There was also evidence of a worrying acceptance of poor care, of poor behaviour among colleagues being condoned.’
Raising Concerns – a familiar challenge
Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Ely Hospital 1969
Bristol Royal Infirmary Enquiry 2001
Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Inquiry 2010
John Marshall, GMC President, 1887-1891
Raising Concerns – a problem on the wane?
Complaints from all sources to GMC are up - 8,109 in 2012 up 24% since 2011 and 104% since 2007
Complaints from doctors to the GMC have risen by 113% over the last five years
GMC Confidential Helpline - 881 calls from Doctors (66 investigations) in the last 12 months
GMC NTS results: ~16% of doctors in training raised a concern in the last year
Evidence in practice: Julie Bailey Helene Donnelly Colchester ‘whistle-blower’ on Cancer Care Pathway
Place these barriers to raising concerns in order of significance
Systems/routes to complain are not clear
Fear of recrimination from employers,
colleagues or doctor about whom
complaint is made
Feeling nothing will change
Theme 3 – The Good Doctor
Place these characteristics of a doctor in order of importance to you
Knowledge/expertise
Compassion/empathy
Listens and responds in partnership
Communicates well
Confidence they are up to date
Integrity
What patients and the public told us(GMP Consultation 2011)
What doctors told us(Sample of 90 doctors – 2013)
Closing question
Will, in the long run, the last year have been
good or bad for the future of medical
professionalism?
1. Good – from crisis….renewal
2. Bad – its all downhill from here
3. Neither - it won’t make a blind bit of difference
Lunch and exhibitionUpper foyer and Exchange hall