gong-gong eco-cultural and historical tourism … eco-cultural and historical... · basic...
TRANSCRIPT
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
1
GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM
DESTINATION, NEAR BARKLY WEST, NORTHERN CAPE
DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
DENC Reference: NC/BA/21/FB/DIK/GON1/2016
Prepared for:
Tshani Consulting
On behalf of:
Frances Baard District Municipality
Prepared by:
EOH Coastal & Environmental Services
EAST LONDON 25 Tecoma Street
East London, 5201 043 726 7809
Also in Grahamstown, Cape Town, Johannesburg, Port Elizabeth and Maputo
www.cesnet.co.za | www.eoh.co.za
August 2016
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
2
Project applicant: Frances Baard District Municipality
Business reg. no. /ID. no.:
Contact person: Mamikie Bogatsu
Postal address: Private Bag X6088, Kimberly, 8300
Telephone: 053 838 0911 Cell:
Fax:
E-mail: [email protected] 053 861 1538
Prepared by:
Environmental Assessment
Practitioner/Firm: EOH Coastal and Environmental Services
Business reg. no. /ID. no.: 2012/151672/07
Contact person: Nande Suka
Postal address: P.O Box 8145, Nahoon, 5210
Telephone: (043) 726 7809 Cell: Fax:
E-mail: [email protected] (043) 726 8352
(For official use only)
File Reference Number:
Application Number:
Date Received:
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
3
Basic Assessment Report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014,
promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended.
Kindly note that: 1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority
in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2014 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being applied for.
2. This report format is current as of 08 December 2014. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ascertain whether subsequent versions of the form have been published or produced by the competent authority
3. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing.
4. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable in the report.
5. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision.
6. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations.
7. This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority.
8. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted.
9. The signature of the EAP on the report must be an original signature.
10. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner.
11. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competent authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request, during any stage of the application process.
12. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need to be completed.
13. Should a specialist report or report on a specialised process be submitted at any stage for any part of this application, the terms of reference for such report must also be submitted.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
4
SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION
Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO
If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest” for the specialist appointed and attach in Appendix I. 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION a) Describe the project associated with the listed activities applied for
The Frances Baard District Municipality (FBDM) proposes the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-Cultural and Historical Tourism Destination, on the banks of the Vaal River near Barkley West, in the Dikgatlong Local Municipality of the Northern Cape Province (Figure1.1).
Figure 1: District locality plan from a regional perspective.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
5
Figure 2: Development area in relation to Local Municipalities of the Northern Cape province.
Figure 3: The Gong-Gong Eco-Cultural and Historical Tourism Village development perimeter.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
6
The area has a rich cultural and historical heritage coupled with the areas natural beauty and features such as the Vaal River, dancers cave and Gong-Gong falls. The proposed development is located on farms RE/281 (PNIEL), RE/371, Farm 372 (BAD HOPE), Farm 283 (GONG-GONG), Farm 284 and 1/284 and Farm 282. The project is divided into three phases of development (See Appendix C for site layout): Phase 1 activities:
Swing Bridge
Boardwalk along the river front
Multi-purpose Facility
Amphitheatre
Erection of information boards
Braai areas
Cart rides
Heritage sites
Water activities
Figure 4: Indication of the layout of activities relating to phase one developments. Phase 2 activities:
60 bed lodge
Conference facility
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
7
Restaurant
Additional accommodation units (compact package infrastructure)
Extend the protected area
Figure 5: Indication of the layout of activities relating to phase two developments. Phase 3 activities:
Trail development (represented by the blue dotted line on map 6)
Adventure/teambuilding facility
Backpackers facility
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
8
Figure 6: Indication of the layout of activities relating to phase three developments.
b) Provide a detailed description of the listed activities associated with the project as
applied for
Listed activity as described in GN 734, 735 and 736
Description of project activity
GN R 983 12(iii): The development of bridges
exceeding 100m2 within 32meters of a
watercourse.
A swing bridge of 300m2 spanning across the Vaal River is proposed.
GN R 983 12(x): The development of buildings
exceeding 100m2 within 32 meters of a
watercourse.
A number of structures are proposed for the first phase of development, including a multi-purpose centre of 200m².
GN R 983 12(xi): The development of structures
exceeding 100m2 within 32 meters of a
watercourse.
Braai areas and other structures are proposed.
GN R 983 12(xii): The development of
boardwalks exceeding 100m2 within 32 meters
of a watercourse.
A boardwalk of 920m² along the river is proposed.
GN R 983 19(i): The infilling or depositing of any Construction of the proposed swing bridge and
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
9
material of more than 5m³ into a watercourse. boardwalk may cause removal or deposition of material within the watercourse area.
GN R 983 27: The clearance of 1 ha or more of
indigenous vegetation.
The total combined clearance of indigenous vegetation could exceed 1 hectare.
GN R 983 67(i): Regarding phased
developments.
The development will take place in a phased manner.
2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES “alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general purpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to— (a) the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity; (b) the type of activity to be undertaken; (c) the design or layout of the activity; (d) the technology to be used in the activity; (e) the operational aspects of the activity; and (f) the option of not implementing the activity. Describe alternatives that are considered in this application as required by Appendix 1 (3) (h), Regulation 2014.Alternatives should include a consideration of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity (NOT PROJECT) could be accomplished in the specific instance taking account of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the other alternatives are assessed. The determination of whether site or activity (including different processes, etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt of this report the, competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent. Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees, minutes and seconds. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection. a) Site alternatives
Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)
Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)
The area proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-Cultural and Historical Tourism Destination is rich in natural beauty and heritage features, boasting the Gong-Gong waterfalls, dancers cave and San rock paintings to name a few. The site is located on land previously degraded by historical alluvial mining activities in the area, and later use for farming of
28°30'45.67"S 24°23'36.11"E
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
10
grazing animals. The development of the proposed site thus provides the perfect platform from which visitors can enjoy the many attractions of the area, while posing little threat to intact natural areas. The completion of the development will also help to conserve these intact natural areas from possible future degradation by informal mining activities. No other suitable site has been identified, therefore, no site alternatives have been assessed.
Alternative 2
Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)
Alternative 3
Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)
In the case of linear activities: Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E): Alternative S1 (preferred)
Starting point of the activity
Middle/Additional point of the activity
End point of the activity
Alternative S2 (if any)
Starting point of the activity
Middle/Additional point of the activity
End point of the activity
Alternative S3 (if any)
Starting point of the activity
Middle/Additional point of the activity
End point of the activity
For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with co-ordinates taken every 250 meters along the route for each alternative alignment. In the case of an area being under application, please provide the co-ordinates of the corners of the site as indicated on the lay-out map provided in Appendix A of this form. b) Lay-out alternatives
Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)
Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)
The proposed layout of the facility will occur in areas already degraded through historic alluvial mining activities and use as grazing land. No other layout alternatives have been proposed, as the current layout has been informed by environmental factors and constraints.
28°30'45.67"S 24°23'36.11"E
Alternative 2
Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
11
Alternative 3
Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)
c) Sanitation technology alternatives
Alternative 1 (preferred alternative) – Biodigester Biogas
Bio-digester: This is the preferred sewage treatment facility. The domestic digester is designed as waste to energy solution that turns organic waste (toilet effluent, kitchen waste etc.) into methane gas. Methane gas can be used to cook, heat water in a gas geyser etc. The facility can be operated with gravity and it is a simple system to operate and maintain, with very low skills required.
Alternative 2 – Reed Beds
This is a proven, environmentally friendly sewage treatment method which uses only natural sustainable ecological processes. Gravity driven systems do not require any energy input and maintenance requirements are low. They are highly effective when properly designed and can be used in combination with ponds and wetlands to produce near river quality water. Vertical flow reed-beds are more effective at nitrifying effluents, converting ammonia into nitrates and nitrites, than most package sewage treatment plants. Operational and maintenance costs are low.
Alternative 3
d) Other alternatives (e.g. scheduling, demand, input, scale and design alternatives)
Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
e) No-go alternative
The No-Go alternative assessed the possible impacts which will result if the development does not take place.
Paragraphs 3 – 13 below should be completed for each alternative.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
12
3. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY a) Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternative
activities/technologies (footprints): Alternative: Size of the activity:
Alternative A11 (preferred activity alternative) 980 000 m2
Alternative A2 (if any) m2
Alternative A3 (if any) m2
or, for linear activities: Alternative: Length of the activity:
Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) m
Alternative A2 (if any) m
Alternative A3 (if any) m
b) Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints
will occur): Alternative: Size of the site/servitude:
Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) 18 000 000 m2
Alternative A2 (if any) m2
Alternative A3 (if any) m2
1 “Alternative A..” refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
13
4. SITE ACCESS
Does ready access to the site exist? YES NO
If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built m
Describe the type of access road planned:
Currently there are two existing gravel roads accessing the proposed site of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination. Access Road 1: A surfaced and well maintained 5.4km long double lane gravel road accessing the
proposed site for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village. The road is sign posted
from the turnoff on the R31.
Access Road 2: A poorly maintained 7.65km long gravel road accessing the site from the R31.
Figure 7: Map illistrating the positions of the two existing gravel access roads from the R31 to the proposed site of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village.
Include the position of the access road on the site plan and required map, as well as an indication of the road in relation to the site.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
14
5. LOCALITY MAP
An A3 locality map must be attached to the back of this document, as Appendix A. The scale of the locality map must be relevant to the size of the development (at least 1:50 000. For linear activities of more than 25 kilometres, a smaller scale e.g. 1:250 000 can be used. The scale must be indicated on the map.). The map must indicate the following:
an accurate indication of the project site position as well as the positions of the alternative sites, if any;
indication of all the alternatives identified;
closest town(s;)
road access from all major roads in the area;
road names or numbers of all major roads as well as the roads that provide access to the site(s);
all roads within a 1km radius of the site or alternative sites; and
a north arrow;
a legend; and
locality GPS co-ordinates (Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should have at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection).
6. LAYOUT/ROUTE PLAN A detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. It must be attached as Appendix A to this document. The site or route plans must indicate the following:
the property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50 metres of the site;
the current land use as well as the land use zoning of the site;
the current land use as well as the land use zoning each of the properties adjoining the site or sites;
the exact position of each listed activity applied for (including alternatives);
servitude(s) indicating the purpose of the servitude;
a legend; and
a north arrow. 7. SENSITIVITY MAP The layout/route plan as indicated above must be overlain with a sensitivity map that indicates all the sensitive areas associated with the site, including, but not limited to:
watercourses;
the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWS);
ridges;
cultural and historical features;
areas with indigenous vegetation (even if it is degraded or infested with alien species); and
critical biodiversity areas.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
15
The sensitivity map must also cover areas within 100m of the site and must be attached in Appendix A. 8. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Colour photographs from the centre of the site must be taken in at least the eight major compass directions with a description of each photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix B to this report. It must be supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site, if applicable. 9. FACILITY ILLUSTRATION A detailed illustration of the activity must be provided at a scale of at least 1:200 as Appendix C for activities that include structures. The illustrations must be to scale and must represent a realistic image of the planned activity. The illustration must give a representative view of the activity. 10. ACTIVITY MOTIVATION Motivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity):
1. Is the activity permitted in terms of the property’s existing land use rights?
YES NO Please explain
Currently the area proposed for the resorts development is used as grazing land, with small scale illegal mining occurring along the Vaal River. As such, the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural village agrees with the current land used of the site, and may even have a positive impact as it will protect the area from further degradation.
2. Will the activity be in line with the following?
(a) Provincial Spatial Development Framework (PSDF) YES NO Please explain
The development of this site into an Eco-cultural and Historical tourism facility is in line with the Northern Cape SDF. The SDF calls for the promotion of tourism along the Treasure Route and the development of tourism related facilities along the Barkly West-ULCO development corridor.
(b) Urban edge / Edge of Built environment for the area YES NO Please explain
The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural village is situated outside of any built environment and in no way restricts the future growth of urban areas in the vicinity.
(c) Integrated Development Plan (IDP) and Spatial Development Framework (SDF) of the Local Municipality (e.g. would the approval of this application compromise the integrity of the existing approved and credible municipal IDP and SDF?).
YES NO Please explain
The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination is in line with the aims of both the IDP and the SDF of the Dikgatlong Local Municipality, as it has been proposed by the Frances Baard District Municipality (the client) which is bound by the same framework.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
16
(d) Approved Structure Plan of the Municipality YES NO Please explain
As per the SDF of Dikgatlong Local Municipality, Gong-Gong is positioned along a primary corridor which is the R31 and runs parallel to the identified activity spine. The notable feature in close proximity to Gong-Gong is that of licensed Diamond Mining.
Although the proposed Eco Hub and Day Visitor development for Gong-Gong holds a strategic position, no specific accommodation or mention thereof has been referred to in the guiding policy frameworks.
(e) An Environmental Management Framework (EMF) adopted by the Department (e.g. Would the approval of this application compromise the integrity of the existing environmental management priorities for the area and if so, can it be justified in terms of sustainability considerations?)
YES NO Please explain
We are not aware of any other existing Environmental Management Plans adopted by the Department for the area. However, this development application will not compromise the integrity of the existing environmental management priorities. It is believed that the development will promote the environmental integrity of the area.
(f) Any other Plans (e.g. Guide Plan) YES NO Please explain
There are currently no other plans pertaining to the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development.
3. Is the land use (associated with the activity being applied for) considered within the timeframe intended by the existing approved SDF agreed to by the relevant environmental authority (i.e. is the proposed development in line with the projects and programmes identified as priorities within the credible IDP)?
YES NO Please explain
The proposed development is not identified as a priority project in both the SDF and IDP.
4. Does the community/area need the activity and the associated land use concerned (is it a societal priority)? (This refers to the strategic as well as local level (e.g. development is a national priority, but within a specific local context it could be inappropriate.)
YES NO Please explain
The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination will benefit the Frances Baard District as a whole, as well as the local community. With the realignment of the Treasure Route to include Gong-Gong, the Frances Baard District may benefit from the increase in the number of tourists visiting the area. The local community will also benefit as developers aim to employ local people for the construction and operation of the resort.
5. Are the necessary services with adequate capacity currently available (at the time of application), or must additional capacity be created to cater for the development? (Confirmation by the relevant Municipality in this regard must be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report as Appendix I.)
YES NO Please explain
Currently the site is not serviced by the municipal water or electricity supply systems.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
17
6. Is this development provided for in the infrastructure planning of the municipality, and if not what will the implication be on the infrastructure planning of the municipality (priority and placement of services and opportunity costs)? (Comment by the relevant Municipality in this regard must be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report as Appendix I.)
YES NO Please explain
Water and sanitation services to the Gong-Gong area are highlighted in the Frances Baard DM SDF.
However, there are no dedicated services to the proposed development area.
7. Is this project part of a national programme to address an issue of national concern or importance?
YES NO Please explain
The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination does not form
part of any national programme.
8. Do location factors favour this land use (associated with the activity applied for) at this place? (This relates to the contextualisation of the proposed land use on this site within its broader context.)
YES NO Please explain
The current location proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical
Tourism Destination is centrally situated between a number of natural, cultural and historical heritage
features making it the perfect platform from which tourists can access these sites.
9. Is the development the best practicable environmental option for this land/site?
YES NO Please explain
The site proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism
Destination has been degraded by historical mining activities and use as grazing land. The Gong-
Gong development is the best practicable environmental option for the area, as it will protect the site
from further degradation while preserving all heritage sites.
10. Will the benefits of the proposed land use/development outweigh the negative impacts of it?
YES NO Please explain
The potential socio-economic benefits associated with the project outweigh any negative impacts, as
the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development has been previously degraded by
historical mining activities, decreasing the potential significance of impacts on natural areas.The
development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural village has the potential to improve the current state of
the environment.
11. Will the proposed land use/development set a precedent for similar activities in the area (local municipality)?
YES NO Please explain
The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village is not intended to set
a precedent for similar activities in the area, although the success of the project will stimulate the local
economy and increase tourism in the area, which may promote the development of similar projects
indirectly.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
18
12. Will any person’s rights be negatively affected by the proposed activity/ies?
YES NO Please explain
The proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development will not negatively affect any person’s rights.
13. Will the proposed activity/ies compromise the “urban edge” as defined by the local municipality?
YES NO Please explain
The site proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism facility
is found outside the boundaries of the urban edge, and the nature of the activity will not compromise
the urban edge.
14. Will the proposed activity/ies contribute to any of the 17 Strategic Integrated Projects (SIPS)?
YES NO Please explain
The proposed development does not directly contribute to any of the 17 listed SIPS.
15. What will the benefits be to society in general and to the local communities?
Please explain
The development will stimulate the local economy both directly and indirectly by attracting visitors and
tourists. It will provide a platform from which people can access the natural, cultural and historical
features of the area. The development will also benefit local communities directly by providing much
needed jobs and skills development.
16. Any other need and desirability considerations related to the proposed activity?
Please explain
The Northern Cape desperately needs the development of tourist attracting developments to
stimulate the economy and create employment opportunities for local peoples.
17. How does the project fit into the National Development Plan for 2030? Please explain
The project fits into the NDP as it has the potential to raise employment opportunities in the area as well as kick-starting economic growth. The project will employ local peoples and provide them with skills development.
18. Please describe how the general objectives of Integrated Environmental Management as set out in section 23 of NEMA have been taken into account.
The following provides an analysis of how the objectives of integrated environmental management (IEM) have been considered in the current Gong-Gong Eco-cultural Development. The general objective of IEM is to:
(a) promote the integration of the principles of environmental management set out in section 2 into the making of all decisions which may have a significant effect on the environment;
Alignment with NEMA principles described below (see Section 19 assessment below).
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
19
(b) identify, predict and evaluate the actual and potential impacts on the environment, socio-economic conditions and cultural heritage, the risks and consequences and alternatives and options for mitigation of activities, with a view to minimizing negative impacts, maximizing benefits and promoting compliance with the principles of environmental management set out in section 2;
Implicit in the current EIA process.
(c) ensure that the effects of activities on the environment receive adequate consideration before actions are taken in connection with them;
Implicit in the current EIA process.
(d) ensure adequate and appropriate opportunity for public participation in decisions that may affect the environment;
The current EIA process has included a
comprehensive PP process, including:
Publicised the project through visible signage, local press adverts, and identification of local stakeholders through engagement with Dikgatlong Local Municipality, Ward Councillors and other government officials and parastatals.
Engagement with public during public consultation and telephonic, postal and email correspondence.
(e) ensure the consideration of environmental attributes in management and decision-making which may have a significant effect on the environment; and
A comprehensive assessment of the significance of impacts has been conducted as part of the BAR.
(f) identify and employ the modes of environmental management best suited to ensuring that a particular activity is pursued in accordance with the principles of environmental management set out in section 23.
A comprehensive feasibility study, including consideration of environmental issues, was conducted prior to selecting alternatives for inclusion in this EIA assessment.
19. Please describe how the principles of environmental management as set out in section 2 of NEMA have been taken into account.
2. (1) The principles set out in this section apply throughout the Republic to the actions of all organs of state that may significantly affect the environment and;
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
20
(a) shall apply alongside all other appropriate and relevant considerations, including the State’s responsibility to respect, protect, promote and fulfil the social and economic rights in Chapter 2 of the Constitution and in particular the basic needs of categories of persons disadvantaged by unfair discrimination;
The onus is on the proponent to demonstrate to the authorising agency (DENC) that the State will not be abrogating its responsibility by authorising the proposed development
Complies
The EIA process has been
undertaken in order to provide
the relevant decision-makers
with the required information.
The required EIA should provide sufficient information for the relevant authority to make a defendable and informed decision.
(b) serve as the general framework within which environmental management and implementation plans must be formulated;
The onus is on the proponent to demonstrate to DENC that the NEMA principles will not compromised.
Complies
It is the opinion of this review
that the proposed development
does not conflict with NEMA
principles in such a manner
that it places undue risks on the
natural or socio-economic
environment.
Mitigation measures that have been identified for possible impacts must be effectively implemented.
(c) serve as guidelines by reference to which any organ of state must exercise any function when taking any decision in terms of this Act or any statutory provision concerning the protection of the environment;
The onus is on the proponent to demonstrate to the authorising agency (DENC) that in providing environmental authorisation the principles of NEMA are duly addressed.
Complies
The EIA process has been
undertaken in order to provide
the relevant decision-makers
with the required information.
The required EIA should
provide sufficient information
for the relevant authority to
make a defendable and
informed decision.
(d) serve as principles by reference to which a conciliator appointed under this Act must make recommendations; and
Not Applicable Not Applicable
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
21
(e) guide the interpretation, administration and implementation of this Act, and any other law concerned with the protection or management of the environment.
Not Applicable Not Applicable
(2) Environmental management must place people and their needs at the forefront of its concern, and serve their physical, psychological, developmental, cultural and social interests equitably
The EIA process must demonstrate that the needs of local people will be adequately addressed and that the development will serve the interests of the public equitably.
Complies
The proposed development will
not result in any undue or
unacceptable impacts on the
local socio-economic
environment. Nor will any
impacts be unfairly distributed.
Recommendations made in the
BAR must be adopted.
(3) Development must be socially, environmentally and economically sustainable.
The EIA process must demonstrate that the development is socially, environmentally and economically sustainable.
Complies
There is currently no indication
that the proposed project would
result in undue or
environmental, social and
economic impacts that would
place the sustainability of local
natural systems or the project at
risk.
Recommendations made in the
BAR must be adopted.
(4) (a) Sustainable development requires the consideration of all relevant factors including the following:
(i) that the disturbance of
ecosystems and loss of
biological diversity are avoided,
or, where they cannot be
altogether avoided, are
minimised and
remedied;
The development should not result in a significant loss of biodiversity. Should any loss occur then the development should seek to minimise or remedy the impact or provide suitable off-sets.
Complies
Disturbance of local
ecosystems must be avoided or
impacts must be mitigated.
A rehabilitation plan will assist
in reducing the impact and
providing benefits in terms of
the re-establishment of natural
vegetation.
The recommendations made in
the Environmental Management
Programme must be adopted.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
22
(ii) that pollution and
degradation of the environment
are avoided, or, where they
cannot be altogether avoided,
are minimised and remedied;
Certain activities associated
with the project carry risks in
terms of pollution and
environmental degradation.
This includes: Storm water run-
off.
Complies
The BAR notes that impacts
with regard to pollution and
degradation of the environment
can be managed and will not
result in an unacceptable
impact on the local
environment.
The recommendations made in
the BAR must be adopted.
Particular focus must be given
to the Environmental
Management Programme with
regard to:
Monitoring of stormwater;
Alien Vegetation Management; and
Erosion Management.
(iii) that the disturbance of
landscapes and sites that
constitute the nation’s cultural
heritage is avoided, or where it
cannot be altogether avoided,
is minimised and remedied;
The proponent would need to
demonstrate that it would not
impact on sites of valuable
cultural and historical heritage.
Complies
A Heritage Impact Assessment
must be conducted, and
recommendations of the
Heritage Specialist must be
adopted.
(iv) that waste is avoided, or
where it cannot be altogether
avoided, minimised and re-
used or recycled where
possible and otherwise
disposed of in a responsible
manner;
Certain activities associated
with the project carry risks in
terms of pollution and
environmental degradation.
Complies
The BAR notes that impacts
with regard to pollution and
degradation of the environment
can be managed and will not
result in unacceptable impact
on the local environment.
The recommendations made in
the BAR must be adopted.
Particular focus must be given
to the Environmental
Management Programme.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
23
(v) that the use and exploitation
of non-renewable natural
resources is responsible and
equitable, and takes into
account the consequences of
the depletion of the resource;
Not Applicable - the project
does not involve the exploitation
of non-renewable resources.
Not Applicable
(vi) that the development, use
and exploitation of renewable
resources and the ecosystems
of which they are part do not
exceed the level beyond which
their integrity is jeopardised.
The project should not involve
the unsustainable use of
renewable resources and
ecosystems, nor should any
related secondary impacts
result in increased resource
use.
Complies
The proponent does not intend
to and neither will they support
the over-use of groundwater as
a renewable resource.
Mitigation measures must be
effectively implemented,
especially on-going monitoring.
11. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES List all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are applicable to the application as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable:
Title of legislation, policy or guideline
Applicability to the project Administering authority
Date
National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) (No. 107 of 1998)
The proposed activities relating to the development trigger a BAR in terms on NEMA listed activities.
DEA, DENC 1998
National Environment Management: Biodiversity Act (No.10 of 2004)
The proposed development will require the clearing of vegetation as well as construction related activities which may potentially pose a threat to the environment.
DEA, DENC 2004
National Heritage Resources Act (No. 25 of 1999)
The proposed location of the development is found near known memorial and grave sites as well as SAN rock paintings.
SAHRA 1999
National Water Act (No. 36 of 1998)
The proposed development will take place on the banks of the Vaal River and may require the abstraction of water.
Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS)
1998
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
24
12. WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT a) Solid waste management
Will the activity produce solid construction waste during the construction/initiation phase?
YES NO
If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? 50 m3
How will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?
Solid waste must be stored in a central, secured location as far as possible from the watercourse and will be stored temporarily until removed to the nearest licensed landfill site.
Where will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?
All solid waste will be collected at a central location and will be stored temporarily until removed to the nearest licensed landfill site which is in either Delportshoop or Barkly West.
Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase? YES NO
If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? 50 m3
How will the solid waste be disposed of (describe)?
All solid waste will be collected at a central location and will be stored temporarily until removed to the nearest licensed landfill site which is in either Delportshoop or Barkly West.
If the solid waste will be disposed of into a municipal waste stream, indicate which registered landfill site will be used.
Solid waste will be disposed of into either the Delportshoop or Barkly West licensed municipal landfills.
Where will the solid waste be disposed of if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream (describe)?
N/A
If the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registered landfill site or be taken up in a municipal waste stream, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.
Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of the NEM:WA? YES NO
If YES, inform the competent authority and request a change to an application for scoping and EIA. An application for a waste permit in terms of the NEM:WA must also be submitted with this application.
Is the activity that is being applied for a solid waste handling or treatment facility? YES NO
If YES, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. An application for a waste permit in terms of the NEM:WA must also be submitted with this application. b) Liquid effluent
Will the activity produce effluent, other than normal sewage, that will be disposed of in a municipal sewage system?
YES NO
If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? m3
Will the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of on site? YES NO
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
25
If YES, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.
Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at another facility?
YES NO
If YES, provide the particulars of the facility:
Facility name:
Contact person:
Postal address:
Postal code:
Telephone: Cell:
E-mail: Fax:
Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste water, if any:
A natural reed bed soak away system will be implemented to treat the sewage produced by the development, returning near river quality water. Grey water will be pumped from the septic tank to the 250m2 reed bed that will be situated a great distance away from the river. The sludge will be approximately 0.1m3/person/year, and the septic tank will have to be desludged yearly. The water from the reed beds can be used for gardening, while for other requirements, rain water harvesting is recommended.
c) Emissions into the atmosphere
Will the activity release emissions into the atmosphere other that exhaust emissions and dust associated with construction phase activities?
YES NO
If YES, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO
If YES, the applicant must consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. If NO, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration:
Small amounts of dust will be generated during the construction phase. This however, will be
mitigated.
d) Waste permit
Will any aspect of the activity produce waste that will require a waste permit in terms of the NEM:WA?
YES NO
If YES, please submit evidence that an application for a waste permit has been submitted to the competent authority e) Generation of noise
Will the activity generate noise? YES NO
If YES, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
26
Describe the noise in terms of type and level:
Noise relating to general construction activities will occur during the construction phase when heavy
equipment and machinery will be used. These noise issues will be mitigated. During the operational
phase, noise may arise from resort users and their vehicles, but these are expected to be of a low
intensity and require no mitigation action.
13. WATER USE Please indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by ticking the appropriate box(es):
Municipal Water board Groundwater River, stream, dam or lake
Other (rain water harvesting)
The activity will not use water
If water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural feature, please indicate the volume that will be extracted per month:
651 kilolitres
Does the activity require a water use authorisation (general authorisation or water use license) from the Department of Water Affairs?
YES NO
If YES, please provide proof that the application has been submitted to the Department of Water Affairs. (application not lodged yet)
14. ENERGY EFFICIENCY Describe the design measures, if any, which have been taken to ensure that the activity is energy efficient:
The use of technologies such as solar PV and solar hot water heaters, energy efficient lights, heaters and air
conditioners etc. for Gong-Gong Eco Cultural Village should be promoted.
Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the design of the activity, if any:
The use of technologies such as solar PV and solar hot water heaters, energy efficient lights, heaters and air
conditioners etc. for the Gong-Gong Eco Cultural Village should be promoted.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
27
SECTION B: SITE/AREA/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Important notes: 1. For linear activities (pipelines, etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be
necessary to complete this section for each part of the site that has a significantly different environment. In such cases please complete copies of Section B and indicate the area, which is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan.
Section B Copy No. (e.g. A):
2. Paragraphs 1 - 6 below must be completed for each alternative.
3. Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO
If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest” for each specialist thus appointed and attach it in Appendix I. All specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D. Property description/physical address:
Province Northern Province
District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality
Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality
Ward Number(s) Ward 5
Farm name and number
Farm 281 (PNIEL)
Portion number 0-Remaining Extent
SG Code C00700000000028100000
Province Northern Province
District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality
Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality
Ward Number(s) Ward 5
Farm name and number
Farm 282,
Portion number 0
SG Code C00700000000028200000
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
28
Province Northern Province
District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality
Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality
Ward Number(s) Ward 5
Farm name and number
Farm 283 (Gong-Gong)
Portion number 2
SG Code C00700000000028300002
Province Northern Province
District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality
Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality
Ward Number(s) Ward 5
Farm name and number
Farm 284
Portion number 0-Remaining Extent
SG Code C00700000000028400000
Province Northern Province
District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality
Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality
Ward Number(s) Ward 5
Farm name and number
Farm 284
Portion number 1
SG Code C00700000000028400001
Province Northern Province
District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality
Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality
Ward Number(s) Ward 5
Farm name and number
Farm 371
Portion number 0-Remaining Extent
SG Code C00700000000037100000
Province Northern Province
District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality
Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality
Ward Number(s) Ward 5
Farm name and number
Farm 372 (BAD HOPE)
Portion number 0
SG Code C00700000000037200000
Where a large number of properties are involved (e.g. linear activities), please attach a full list to this application including the same information as indicated above.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
29
Current land-use zoning as per local municipality IDP/records:
Current land uses identified in the area are: low density residential use, alluvial mining and the Good Hope Nature Reserve.
In instances where there is more than one current land-use zoning, please attach a list of current land use zonings that also indicate which portions each use pertains to, to this application.
Is a change of land-use or a consent use application required? YES NO
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
30
1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE Indicate the general gradient of the site.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
31
Figure 8 indicating the gradient of the proposed site. Alternative S1:
Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5
Alternative S2 (if any):
Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5
Alternative S3 (if any):
Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5
2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE
Figure 9 illustrating the location of the proposed Gong-Gong development (indicated by the red square) in relation to landform features. Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site:
2.1 Ridgeline 2.4 Closed valley 2.7 Undulating plain / low hills X
2.2 Plateau 2.5 Open valley X 2.8 Dune
2.3 Side slope of hill/mountain 2.6 Plain X 2.9 Seafront
2.10 At sea
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
32
3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE
GEOLOGY Kimberlite pipes surface in the eastern part of the District, particularly around Kimberley and Windsorton, in combinations of shale and tilite. In some instances deposits from these pipes have washed down the rivers creating opportunities for alluvial diamond mining. Large deposits of lime stone are found in the junction between the dolomite and sedimentary systems along the Ghaap Escarpment in the Ulco area (FBDM Spatial Development Framework: October 2007).
Figure 10: Map indicating the underlying geology of the Gong-Gong development area and surroundings. SOILS The study area is covered by recent colluvial and alluvial sandy, gravelly, silty and clayey soils overlying residual soils and bedrock belonging to the Karoo, Transvaal and Ventersdorp Supergroups, numerous younger Post-Karoo dolerite dykes and sills are intruded into these formations. The major portion (some 65% of the surface area) of the FBDM is underlain by dolomite and chert bedrock belonging to the Campbell Rand Formation, Ghaap Group, Transvaal Supergroup
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
33
Figure 11: Map indicating the soil associations in the Gong-Gong Eco-village development area. GROUND WATER
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
34
Figure 12 indicating the positions of boreholes in the area.
Is the site(s) located on any of the following? Alternative S1: Alternative S2
(if any): Alternative S3
(if any):
Shallow water table (less than 1.5m deep) YES NO YES NO YES NO
Dolomite, sinkhole or doline areas YES NO YES NO YES NO
Seasonally wet soils (often close to water bodies)
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
Unstable rocky slopes or steep slopes with loose soil
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
Dispersive soils (soils that dissolve in water) YES NO YES NO YES NO
Soils with high clay content (clay fraction more than 40%)
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
Any other unstable soil or geological feature YES NO YES NO YES NO
An area sensitive to erosion YES NO YES NO YES NO
If you are unsure about any of the above or if you are concerned that any of the above aspects may be an issue of concern in the application, an appropriate specialist should be appointed to assist in the completion of this section. Information in respect of the above will often be available as part of the project information or at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scale Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by the Council for Geo Science may also be consulted.
4. GROUNDCOVER Indicate the types of groundcover present on the site. The location of all identified rare or endangered species or other elements should be accurately indicated on the site plan(s).
Natural veld - good conditionE
Natural veld with scattered aliensE
Natural veld with heavy alien infestationE
Veld dominated by alien speciesE
Gardens
Sport field Cultivated land Paved surface Building or other structure
Bare soil
If any of the boxes marked with an “E “is ticked, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in the completion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’t have the necessary expertise.
NOTE: EOH CES has the necessary expertise and specialist knowledge to complete this section.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
35
5. SURFACE WATER Indicate the surface water present on and or adjacent to the site and alternative sites?
Perennial River YES NO UNSURE
Non-Perennial River YES NO UNSURE
Permanent Wetland YES NO UNSURE
Seasonal Wetland YES NO UNSURE
Artificial Wetland YES NO UNSURE
Estuarine / Lagoonal wetland YES NO UNSURE
If any of the boxes marked YES or UNSURE is ticked, please provide a description of the relevant watercourse.
The development occurs along the banks of the Vaal River: the largest tributary of the Orange River in South Africa. The river has its source near Breyten in Mpumalanga provinve, wherefrom it flows westward towards its conjunction with the Orange River southwest of Kimberley.
6. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA Indicate land uses and/or prominent features that currently occur within a 500m radius of the site and give description of how this influences the application or may be impacted upon by the application:
Natural area Dam or reservoir Polo fields
Low density residential Hospital/medical centre Filling station H
Medium density residential School Landfill or waste treatment site
High density residential Tertiary education facility Plantation
Informal residentialA Church Agriculture
Retail commercial & warehousing Old age home River, stream or wetland
Light industrial Sewage treatment plantA Nature conservation area
Medium industrial AN Train station or shunting yard N Mountain, koppie or ridge
Heavy industrial AN Railway line N Museum
Power station Major road (4 lanes or more) N Historical building
Office/consulting room Airport N Protected Area
Military or police base/station/compound
Harbour Graveyard
Spoil heap or slimes damA Sport facilities Archaeological site
Quarry, sand or borrow pit Golf course Other land uses (describe)
If any of the boxes marked with an “N “are ticked, how this impact will / be impacted upon by the proposed activity? Specify and explain:
N/A
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
36
If any of the boxes marked with an "An" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the proposed activity? Specify and explain:
N/A
If any of the boxes marked with an "H" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the proposed activity? Specify and explain:
N/A
Does the proposed site (including any alternative sites) fall within any of the following:
Critical Biodiversity Area (as per provincial conservation plan) YES NO
Core area of a protected area? YES NO
Buffer area of a protected area? YES NO
Planned expansion area of an existing protected area? YES NO
Existing offset area associated with a previous Environmental Authorisation? YES NO
Buffer area of the SKA? YES NO
If the answer to any of these questions was YES, a map indicating the affected area must be included in Appendix A.
7. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES
Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as defined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act No. 25 of 1999), including Archaeological or paleontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the site? If YES, explain:
YES NO
Uncertain
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
37
There are a number of significant cultural and historical heritage elements found on the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination, as the developments concept is based on attracting tourism to the area by making these elements more accessible to the public while protecting them for future generations. These heritage elements include:
Historical building: old miner’s house.
Graveyard found in the proposed development area.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
38
Rock paintings believed to be of San origin are found onsite.
Stone packed graves believed to be a memorial site.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
39
If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field (archaeology or palaeontology) to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site. Briefly explain the findings of the specialist:
A Heritage Impact Assessment is recommended.
Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO
Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?
YES NO
If YES, please provide proof that this permit application has been submitted to SAHRA or the relevant provincial authority. 8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTER a) Local Municipality Please provide details on the socio-economic character of the local municipality in which the proposed site(s) are situated. Level of unemployment:
The unemployment rate in Dikgatlong is 40%, with the youth unemployment rate standing at 49,0%(StatsSA).
Figure 13: The unemployment rate in local municipalities.
Economic profile of local municipality: The Dikgatlong Local Municipalities economy is driven primarily by livestock, irrigation farming and commercial mining.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
40
Figure 14: Economic sector distrobution of the DLM population(from DLM SDF).
Figure 15a & 15b: Income statistics for local municipalities.
Level of education:
The main contributing factor to the low levels of employment in Dikgatlong is the high percentage (86,2%) of the labour force that has not obtained a Grade 12 Senior Certificate or higher qualification, resulting in a primarily unskilled labour force(StatsSA).
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
41
Figure 16: indicating the education level of the Dikgatlong Local Municipalities population (from DLM SDF).
b) Socio-economic value of the activity
What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? Unknown
What is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result of the activity?
Unknown
Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? YES NO
Is the activity a public amenity? YES NO
How many new employment opportunities will be created in the development and construction phase of the activity/ies?
Unknown
What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the development and construction phase?
Unknown
What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? Unknown
How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during the operational phase of the activity?
Unknown
What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during the first 10 years?
Unknown
What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? Unknown
9. BIODIVERSITY Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the biodiversity occurring on the site and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies. To assist with the identification of the biodiversity occurring on site and the ecosystem status consult http://bgis.sanbi.org or [email protected]. Information is also available on compact disc (cd) from the Biodiversity-GIS Unit, Ph (021) 799 8698. This information may be updated from time to time and it is the applicant/ EAP’s responsibility to ensure that the latest version is used. A map of the relevant biodiversity information (including an indication of the habitat conditions as per (b) below) and must be provided as an overlay map to the property/site plan as Appendix D to this report.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
42
a) Indicate the applicable biodiversity planning categories of all areas on site and indicate
the reason(s) provided in the biodiversity plan for the selection of the specific area as part of the specific category)
Systematic Biodiversity Planning Category If CBA or ESA, indicate the reason(s) for its selection in biodiversity plan
Critical Biodiversity Area (CBA)
Ecological Support
Area (ESA)
Other Natural Area
(ONA)
No Natural Area
Remaining (NNR)
b) Indicate and describe the habitat condition on site
Habitat Condition
Percentage of habitat
condition class (adding up to 100%)
Description and additional Comments and Observations
(Including additional insight into condition, e.g. poor land management practises, presence of quarries,
grazing, harvesting regimes etc).
Natural <10%
Only a very small portion of the proposed area is in its natural state due to historical alluvial mining activities in the area and later use as grazing land. This consists of small patches or clumps of natural vegetation.
Near Natural (includes areas with
low to moderate level of alien invasive
plants)
<15%
Only a very small portion of the proposed area remains in a near natural state as a result of historical alluvial mining activities in the area and later use as grazing land.
Degraded (includes areas
heavily invaded by alien plants)
>65%
A large proportion of the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural village has been degraded in the past through historical alluvial mining practices and use as grazing pasture.
Transformed (includes cultivation,
dams, urban, plantation, roads, etc)
10%
A portion of the proposed area is classified as transformed land, being used as low density residential properties and well as a graveyard in the vicinity.
c) Complete the table to indicate:
(i) the type of vegetation, including its ecosystem status, present on the site; and (ii) whether an aquatic ecosystem is present on site.
Terrestrial Ecosystems Aquatic Ecosystems
Ecosystem threat status as per the
National
Critical Wetland (including rivers, depressions, channelled and unchanneled wetlands, flats,
Estuary Coastline Endangered
Vulnerable
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
43
Terrestrial Ecosystems Aquatic Ecosystems
Environmental Management:
Biodiversity Act (Act No. 10 of 2004)
Least Threatened
seeps pans, and artificial wetlands)
YES NO UNSURE YES NO YES NO
d) Please provide a description of the vegetation type and/or aquatic ecosystem present on
site, including any important biodiversity features/information identified on site (e.g. threatened species and special habitats)
The site identified for the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village falls within
the extensive Kimberly Thornveld vegitation type. Kimberly Thornveld is classified as least
threatened and dominated by tree species such as Acacia mellifera, Boscia foetida and Acacia tortillis
and shrub species such as Grewia flava and Aptosimum albomarginatum. There is a moderate
presence of alien vegitation species dominated by Argemone ochroleuca, Laggera decurrens and
Lactuca serriola.
The protected tree species Boscia foetida occurs in this area and special care must be taken not to
desturb these individuals. Special habitat areas inculde the Vaal river and buffer zone where small
amounts of Highveld Alluvial Vegitation may occur.
Figure 17: SANBI vegetation map for the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical
Tourism Village site and surrounds.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
44
SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 1. ADVERTISEMENT AND NOTICE
Publication name Volksblad
Date published 29th August 2016
Site notice position Latitude Longitude
28°28'28.61"S 24°25'9.62"E
28°30'20.91"S 24°27'23.15"E
Date placed 31st May 2016
Include proof of the placement of the relevant advertisements and notices in Appendix E1. 2. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES Provide details of the measures taken to include all potential I&APs as required by Regulation 41(2)(e) and 41(6) of GN 733. Key stakeholders (other than organs of state) identified in terms of Regulation 41(2)(b) of GN 733
Title, Name and Surname Affiliation/ key stakeholder status Contact details (tel number or e-mail address)
Jabu Hayes Dikgatlong Tourism Association [email protected]
Corrie Solomans Gong-Gong CPA Chairman [email protected]
G.J Phashe PNIEL CPA Chairman [email protected]
Ms Valerie Drift The Griqua Peoples Heritage NPC [email protected]
Include proof that the key stakeholder received written notification of the proposed activities as Appendix E2. This proof may include any of the following:
e-mail delivery reports;
registered mail receipts;
courier waybills;
signed acknowledgements of receipt; and/or
or any other proof as agreed upon by the competent authority. 3. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES
Summary of main issues raised by I&APs Summary of response from EAP
Illegal mining currently happening opposite the proposed facility
Noted
Proposed mining by the CPA Noted
The lack of impartiality by the Dikgatlong Noted
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
45
Municipality
Land ownership Noted
4. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT The practitioner must record all comments received from I&APs and respond to each comment before the Draft BAR is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a comments and response report as prescribed in the EIA regulations and be attached to the Final BAR as Appendix E3. 5. AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION Authorities and organs of state identified as key stakeholders:
Authority/Organ of State
Contact person (Title, Name and Surname)
Tel No Fax No
e-mail Postal address
Northern Cape
Department of
Environment
and Nature
Conservation
(DENC)
Dineo
Moleko
0538077430
N/A
Northern Cape
DWS
Buyisile
July
0538367600 N/A [email protected]
N/A
COGHSTA Joey Botes
0605467557
N/A
Frances Baard
District
Municipality
Mr Lebogang Molefi
0538380911 N/A [email protected]
N/A
Dikgatlong Local
Municipality
Eddie
Manuel
0535316500 N/A [email protected]
N/A
Include proof that the Authorities and Organs of State received written notification of the proposed activities as appendix E4. In the case of renewable energy projects, Eskom and the SKA Project Office must be included in the list of Organs of State.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
46
6. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Note that, for any activities (linear or other) where deviation from the public participation requirements may be appropriate, the person conducting the public participation process may deviate from the requirements of that sub-regulation to the extent and in the manner as may be agreed to by the competent authority. Proof of any such agreement must be provided, where applicable. Application for any deviation from the regulations relating to the public participation process must be submitted prior to the commencement of the public participation process. A list of registered I&APs must be included as appendix E5. Copies of any correspondence and minutes of any meetings held must be included in Appendix E6.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
47
SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT The assessment of impacts must adhere to the minimum requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2014 and should take applicable official guidelines into account. The issues raised by interested and affected parties should also be addressed in the assessment of impacts. 1. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,
OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSED MANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
Provide a summary and anticipated significance of the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts that are likely to occur as a result of the planning and design phase, construction phase, operational phase, decommissioning and closure phase, including impacts relating to the choice of site/activity/technology alternatives as well as the mitigation measures that may eliminate or reduce the potential impacts listed. This impact assessment must be applied to all the identified alternatives to the activities identified in Section A(2) of this report.
Theme APPLICABILITY TO PHASE
PLANNING & DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION AND POLICY COMPLIANCE
YES Failure to adhere to existing policies and obligations.
YES Failure of the contractor to implement mitigation measures included in EA and EMPr.
N/A
ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS
YES Inappropriate layout planning and structural design leading to soil erosion, damage of riparian vegetation, and contamination of surface water.
YES Loss of natural vegetation and erosion of disturbed sites.
YES Loss of natural vegetation and fauna by removal by resort users.
SANITATION
YES Failure to investigate suitable sites for the proposed treatment facility. YES Inadequate planning with regards to storage capacity requirements
YES Inadequate and inappropriate ablution facilities provided for construction workers
YES Failure of the monitoring system and inadequate maintenance.
SURFACE WATER RUNOFF
YES Inadequate planning and provision for storm water.
YES Uncontrolled management of storm water.
YES Failure to maintain storm water drainage system
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
48
Theme APPLICABILITY TO PHASE
PLANNING & DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION
and monitor the effectiveness of storm water management measures.
RIVER CROSSING YES Inappropriate placement of the proposed swing bridge leading to unnecessary damage to the sensitive riverine environment.
YES Inappropriate construction methods used in the riverine area.
N/A
WASTE MANANGEMENT
YES Failure to plan for the storage and disposal of waste.
YES Building construction rubble. Litter management. Storage of hazardous waste.
YES Implementation of waste storage and disposal practices.
SITING OF STRUCTURES YES Inappropriate layout planning for the siting of buildings and sanitation system infrastructure.
N/A N/A
LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL YES Inappropriate architectural design
N/A N/A
STORAGE of HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
YES Inadequate planning for storage of hazardous substances.
YES Site contamination due to inappropriate storage, usage and spillage of hazardous substances
N/A
CONCRETE BATCHING N/A YES Inappropriate concrete batching methods leading to contamination of surface water.
TRAFFIC AND ACCESS ROUTES
YES Inadequate planning for increased traffic.
YES Increased use of servitude road by construction vehicles.
N/A
TECHNOLOGIES EMPLOYED
YES Inadequate consideration of water
N/A
YES Inadequate monitoring of the
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
49
Theme APPLICABILITY TO PHASE
PLANNING & DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION
and energy consumption reducing technologies.
effectiveness of water and energy consumption reducing technologies.
NOISE POLLUTION N/A N/A N/A
AIR POLLUTION (Dust) N/A N/A N/A
ON STE FIRE RISK N/A YES Fires onsite could pose a threat to the environment and adjacent landowners.
YES
SOCIO-ECONOMIC
YES Planning to maximise local job opportunities.
YES Job creation
YES Job creation, Local economic development
Planning and Design Phase
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)
Failure to adhere to relevant environmental regulations and legislation.
Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, failure to adhere to relevant environmental regulations and legislation could lead to the project conflicting with local, provincial and national policies, legislation etc. This could result in lack of institutional support for the project, overall project failure and undue disturbance to the natural environment.
HIGH NEGATIVE
The planning and design of the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must take into account, and comply with all relevant environmental legislation and policy.
In addition, planning for the construction and operation of the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must take into account and consider any available best practice guidelines.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Impacting Ecology
Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, poor planning and placement of all development and infrastructure may result in unnecessary damage and disturbance to natural
MODERATE NEGATIVE
An Environmental Control Officer must be consulted in the detailed planning and design of infrastructure in order to minimise the disturbance of natural
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
50
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
vegetation (Kimberly Thornveld).
vegetation for the development.
All species of special concern, protected or vulnerable must be avoided or transplanted.
Rehabilitation with grasses found on site, in addition to local shade-loving grasses, must be undertaken.
Indirect impacts: During the planning and design phase, poor layout design (i.e. inappropriate utilisation of sensitive systems such as the Vaal River and riparian vegetation) increases the risk of erosion and degradation of watercourses and associated habitats.
HIGH NEGATIVE
The Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development project layout must be designed to ensure that the minimum disturbance of sensitive areas such as the watercourse is achieved as far as is reasonable and practical.
The Lodge and conference venue must not be located within flood prone areas.
A buffer of at least 50m must be maintained around the river and any indigenous riparian vegetation.
Any activity (building of bridges and boardwalks etc.) within 32m of the Vaal River will require a Water Use License.
Cumulative impacts:
Sewage treatment facility
Direct impacts: During the planning and design, poor planning with regards to the resorts’ sanitation requirements may result in a breakdown of the system or overflows of sewage causing contamination of the surrounding environment and water resource.
HIGH NEGATIVE
The sewage treatment system must be situated at least 100m away from the 100 year flood line.
The sewage treatment system must have the capacity to contain overflows.
The system design must be able to easily deal with the facility’s sanitation requirements even during peak season.
Sanitation designs must be
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
51
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
submitted to the DWS for approval, and a Water Use Authorisation must be obtained if required.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Managing surface water runoff
Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, failure to plan properly for storm water (e.g. inadequate planning for storm water drainage and routing of storm water flow, resulting from increased hard surface area and subsequent increase in quantity and velocity of runoff) could result in uncontrolled storm water runoff which can cause flooding and erosion and also result in contamination of surface water and groundwater resources.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
The proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must be located at least 50m away from the river and any other watercourses.
A Storm water Management Plan must be designed and implemented to ensure maximum water seepage at the source of water flow. The plan must also include management mitigation measures for water pollution, waste water management and the management of surface erosion e.g. by considering the applicability of contouring, etc.
The Storm water Management Plan must be designed by a qualified engineer.
Indirect impacts: During the planning and design phase, failure to plan properly for storm water (e.g. inadequate planning for storm water drainage and routing of storm water flow, resulting from increased hard surface area and subsequent increase in quantity and velocity of runoff) could result in uncontrolled storm water runoff which can cause flooding and erosion and also result in contamination of surface water and groundwater resources.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Same as above.
Cumulative impacts:
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
52
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
Planning the hang bridge river crossing
Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, the inappropriate design of the proposed hang bridge across the Vaal River could lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.
HIGH NEGATIVE
The planning and design of the river crossing must be located in an area least prone to erosion, and take into account the ability for bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization.
The bridge design should minimize the anchor point area as much as is safely possible.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Waste management
Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate planning for management and disposal of waste could result in surface and ground water contamination.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
A waste management plan for handling onsite waste must be developed and implemented.
An appropriate area where waste can be stored before disposal must be designated.
Indirect impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate planning for management and disposal of waste could result in surface and ground water contamination.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Same as above.
Cumulative impacts:
Planning for the siting of structures
Direct impacts: During the
planning and design phase, poor
planning for the siting of the
sewage treatment infrastructure
could result in inadvertent spillage
or run-off of effluent into the river.
MODERATE
NEGATIVE
The sewage treatment infrastructure must be situated at least 50m away from the 100 year flood line.
The system must have adequate capacity to contain overflows.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Landscape and visual
Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase,
LOW NEGATIVE
Sighting and scale of
structures:
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
53
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
considerations inappropriate architectural design or lack of aesthetic considerations may result in aesthetic impacts on the currently open landscape.
An independent Environmental Control Office (ECO) must assist in the sighting of development.
An appropriate environmentally and visually sensitive architectural and aesthetics code must be developed to limit visual intrusion of the built form.
Building heights should preferably be restricted to single storey, and tucked into the landscape.
Architectural guidelines must be formulated with a view to blending buildings into the landscape through selection of specific materials and colours. Natural materials should be adopted if possible (e.g. stone, wood, etc.) and roof and wall colours must be natural (greens, browns and greys).
Screening measures: Appropriate indigenous tree species must be planted to create visual screen for all structures.
Indirect impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate architectural design or lack of aesthetic considerations may result in aesthetic impacts on the currently open landscape.
LOW NEGATIVE
Same as above.
Cumulative impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate architectural design or lack of aesthetic considerations may result in aesthetic impacts on the currently open landscape.
LOW NEGATIVE
Same as above.
Planning for the storage of
Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase,
LOW NEGATIVE
All hazardous substances such as paints, diesel and
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
54
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
hazardous substances
inappropriate planning for the storage of hazardous substances such as diesel, paint, pesticides etc., used onsite could lead to surface and ground water pollution (e.g. due to oil leaks, spillage of diesel etc.). In addition, these hazardous substances could be washed off into the nearby watercourse.
cement must be stored in a bunded area with an impermeable surface beneath them.
The developer must designate appropriate areas for the storage of hazardous substances.
Indirect impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate planning for the storage of hazardous substances such as diesel, paint, pesticides etc., used onsite could lead to surface and ground water pollution (e.g. due to oil leaks, spillage of diesel etc.). In addition, these hazardous substances could be washed off into the nearby watercourse.
LOW NEGATIVE
Same as above.
Cumulative impacts:
Traffic and transport consideration
Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate routing of internal roads through or close to watercourses could lead to unnecessary impacts on riparian vegetation.
HIGH NEGATIVE
All internal roads should be located at least 50m away from any watercourse. Where unavoidable, roads must avoid sensitive areas.
If located within 32m of a watercourse, the construction of such a road will require a Water Use License (WUL).
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Failure to employ green technology
Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, failure to consider technologies that reduce consumption of natural resources (particularly water and electricity) will result in lost opportunity to conserve resources.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Water:
Rainwater tanks should be considered in the design and planning phase. Tanks will reduce the runoff created by the housing footprint and reduce municipal water usage.
Water piping material and infrastructure must comply with SABS to insure as far
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
55
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
as possible pipeline failures and future indirect impacts resulting from burst pipes do not result in water loss.
Energy:
Insulation of houses and use of solar water heaters should be considered.
Use of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power (PV) should be considered in the design and layout. However, if renewable energy technology is not implemented initially, provisions should be made in design to allow for easier post-construction retrofitting.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Construction Phase
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)
Failure to comply with the EMPr
Direct impacts:
Indirect impacts: During the construction phase the failure of the contractor to implement mitigation measures can result in non-compliance with the EA and EMPr.
HIGH NEGATIVE
The developer must employ an independent Environmental Control Officer (ECO) for the construction phase to ensure that construction is implemented according to specifications in the EA and EMPr.
Cumulative impacts:
Impacting ecology
Direct impacts: During the construction phase, unnecessary damage and loss of natural and vulnerable vegetation (Kimberly
HIGH NEGATIVE
The final design and layout must reviewed by the appointed ECO to ensure compliance with the
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
56
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
Thornveld and riparian vegetation) as well as heritage sites beyond the development footprint my result due to uncontrolled construction activities.
approved layout.
Construction activities and vegetation removal must be limited to the developmental footprint to avoid unnecessary loss of vegetation and soil erosion.
Where vegetation has been cleared, site rehabilitation in terms of soil stabilisation and re-vegetation must be undertaken.
Prior to construction, all sensitive areas (including heritage sites) located near areas where development is planned must be demarcated, and signs erected to ensure these areas are maintained. This must be done with the assistance of the ECO.
Indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metre (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation.
Direct impacts: During the construction phase, land disturbance can lead to increased spreading of noxious weeds and invasive alien plants.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Alien plants must be removed from the site through appropriate methods e.g. hand pulling, chemical, cutting, etc., and under the supervision of the ECO.
After construction, exposed areas must be rehabilitated with indigenous vegetation.
Post-construction monitoring of rehabilitation must be implemented.
Direct impacts: During the construction phase, there is the potential risk of poaching of indigenous wild animals by staff employed by the contractor
MODERATE NEGATIVE
All staff employed during construction must undergo environmental induction training.
No construction workers should reside onsite.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
57
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
Direct impacts: During the construction phase, soil exposure due to clearing of land may result in erosion, which in turn may cause sedimentation of the watercourses
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Wind screening and storm water control should be undertaken to prevent soil erosion during construction.
All erosion control mechanisms must be regularly maintained.
Vegetation must be retained where possible to avoid soil erosion.
Construction must be phased in order to minimize the area of exposed soil at any one time.
Re-vegetation of disturbed surfaces must occur immediately after the construction activities are completed with indigenous vegetation.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Sanitation Direct impacts: During the construction phase, the lack of appropriate sanitation facilities for construction workers could lead to the contamination of ground and ground water.
MODERATE Adequate sanitary and ablutions facilities must be provided for construction workers
The facilities must be regularly serviced to reduce the risk of surface or groundwater pollution.
Portable toilets must not be located within 50 meters of any watercourse.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Managing surface water runoff
Direct impacts: During the construction phase, runoff of storm water containing contaminants, silt and litter may contaminate the surrounding environment.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
During construction the site must be managed in a manner that prevents pollution of drains, downstream watercourses or groundwater, due to suspended solids, silt or
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
58
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
chemical pollutants.
Litter must be controlled on site.
Temporary cut-off drains and berms may be required to capture storm water and promote infiltration.
Hazardous substances must be stored at least 100m away from any water bodies on site to avoid pollution.
Indirect impacts: During the construction phase, runoff of storm water containing contaminants, silt and litter may contaminate the surrounding environment.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Same as above.
Cumulative impacts:
Construction of hang-bridge water crossing
Direct impacts: During the construction phase the building of a bridge across the watercourse could lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.
HIGH NEGATIVE
The construction of the bridge must take place in the shortest possible time period and during the low rainfall season.
Bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization must be implemented once construction is complete and must include the use of gabions for bank stabilization.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Management of waste
Direct impacts: Construction rubble left onsite may attract vermin and encourage the growth of opportunistic alien vegetation. Pollution potential if construction waste is not adequately disposed of (i.e. left on site).
MODERATE NEGATIVE
An environmental management programme incorporating waste management issues during the construction phase of the project must be developed and implemented.
Refuse from the construction site must be collected on a regular basis and deposited at an
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
59
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
appropriate landfill site.
All construction materials must be stored in a central and secure location with controlled access with an appropriate impermeable surface.
Direct impacts: During construction there is the potential risk of littering on and around the site by the contractor, which can become unsightly and in some cases lead to health risks.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Construction personnel must be educated in appropriate waste management practices.
Collected waste must be separated and stored by type when feasible.
Litter and construction waste must be removed on a regular basis and disposed of in an approved registered landfill.
Potentially hazardous materials must be handled and stored onsite in secure containers and disposed of at an appropriately permitted hazardous waste disposal site
The Contractor should maintain a register of the hazardous materials and should document the use, storage, final destination and method of disposal.
Indirect impacts: Construction rubble left onsite may attract vermin and encourage the growth of opportunistic alien vegetation. Pollution potential if construction waste is not adequately disposed of (i.e. left on site).
MODERATE NEGATIVE
An environmental management programme incorporating waste management issues during the construction phase of the project must be developed and implemented.
Refuse from the construction site must be collected on a regular basis and deposited at an appropriate landfill site.
All construction materials
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
60
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
must be stored in a central and secure location with controlled access with an appropriate impermeable surface.
Indirect impacts: During the construction phase there is the potential for the inappropriate disposal of construction material off-site and subsequently polluting the environment.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Construction material must be removed to an approved, licenced off-site disposal site by the appointment of a reputable waste services provider.
Cumulative impacts:
Management of hazardous substances
Direct impacts: During the construction phase inappropriate storage and disposal of hazardous building material may pollute the soil and ground water.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
The storage of potentially hazardous material must be controlled to reduce the risk of environmental contamination.
Drip trays must be placed under all machinery to avoid soil contamination.
All vehicles and machinery must be regularly maintained and in good working order to reduce the risk of contamination of soil and ground water.
All areas that have been contaminated during the construction phase must be rehabilitated.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Concrete batching
Direct impacts: During the construction phase inappropriate cement mixing techniques can lead to ground and ground water pollution.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Cement and concrete must not be mixed directly on the ground, or during rainfall events when the potential for transport of pollutants to watercourses is the greatest. Cement and concrete must only be mixed in the area demarcated for this purpose and on an impermeable substratum.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
61
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
All construction water and contaminated runoff must be directed away from the drainage line.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Traffic and access routes
Direct impacts: During the construction phase, increased use of access roads by heavy machinery will cause further degradation to the gravel tracks.
MODERATE
NEGATIVE Road maintenance should
take place regularly, especially after heavy rains.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
On-site fires Direct impacts: During the construction phase, fires started at construction camps could result in uncontrolled fires, posing a threat to wild animals, indigenous vegetation and the surrounding landowners.
HIGH NEGATIVE
All onsite fires must be controlled.
The construction personnel must be educated regarding fire and fire management.
Fire extinguishers must be available onsite.
In order to reduce the risk of fires:
o All flammable substances must be stored in dry areas which do not pose an ignition risk to the said substances.
o Smoking must not be permitted near flammable substances.
o All cooking must be done in demarcated areas that are safe in terms of runaway or uncontrolled fires.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
62
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
Socio-economic stimulation
Direct impacts:
Indirect impacts: During the construction phase, there may be temporary job-creation for members of the community.
MODERATE POSITIVE
No mitigation.
Indirect impacts: During the construction phase increased number of labourers could lead to an increase in security risks in the community.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Access control to the site must ensure no unauthorised person shall enter.
The site must be secured in order to reduce the opportunity for the criminal activity in the locality of the construction site.
Cumulative impacts:
Operational Phase
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)
Ecological disturbance
Direct impacts: During the operational phase, the inappropriate disturbance of land may increase spreading of noxious weeds, invasive and alien plants in the development open space area and surrounds.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
The facility operator must monitor disturbed sites for erosion and the spread of alien vegetation etc. and implement remedial actions.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Sewage treatment facility
Direct impacts: During the operational phase, if the sewage treatment facility is not adequately maintained, effluent of poor quality may be released into the environment, contaminating water sources with nutrient and faecal coliforms.
HIGH NEGATIVE
No treated effluent may be discharged into any watercourse.
Ground water monitoring boreholes must be regularly tested for possible contamination of groundwater.
Effluent quality must, as a minimum, be analysed quarterly to confirm the
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
63
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
effectiveness of the treatment technology, and effluent samples and results submitted to FBDM Sanitation Department.
Appropriate corrective actions must be taken if contamination is detected or effluent quality does not meet discharge standards.
The approved maintenance plan must be implemented.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Management of surface water runoff
Direct impacts: During the operational phase the failure to maintain storm water management measures may result in soil erosion and stream sedimentation.
HIGH NEGATIVE
The effectiveness of the flood attenuation and storm water management measures must be monitored.
The effectiveness of attenuation berms that are situated 32 m above the watercourse must be monitored.
If the storm water management measures put in place are deemed insufficient, alternative measures should be drawn up by a qualified engineer and approved by DENC and DWS before being implemented.
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Management of waste
Direct impacts: During the operational phase inappropriate waste storage and disposal practices may lead to litter, pollution, general nuisances and health hazards.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Waste must be properly managed by separating compostable waste, and providing storage for recyclable waste materials and wastes which must be disposed of into a licensed landfill.
Indirect impacts:
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
64
Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation
Cumulative impacts:
Employing resource saving technologies
Direct impacts: During the operational phase, increased water and energy consumption may lead to a loss in natural resources such as water and energy.
HIGH Measures must be taken to reduce the consumption of natural resources.
Measures should include, but not be limited to, the installation of rainwater tanks to reduce stormwater runoff and the pressure on the municipal water supply, as well as alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar (PV) power
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
Socio-economic consideration
Direct impacts:
Indirect impacts: During the operational phase there may be increased employment opportunities and stimulation of the local economy.
MODERATE POSITIVE
No mitigation.
Indirect impacts: During the operational phase, there may be potential long-term increases of neighbouring land value.
MODERATE POSITIVE
No mitigation.
Cumulative impacts:
No-go option
Cancelling the proposed development.
Direct impacts: Degradation and misuse of site due to possible mining and poor land use management.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
No mitigation.
Direct impacts: All negative activities from the proposed development will be avoided
MODERATE POSITIVE
No mitigation.
Direct impacts: Construction job losses
MODERATE NEGATIVE
No mitigation.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
65
Indirect impacts:
Cumulative impacts:
A complete impact assessment in terms of Regulation 19(3) of GN 733 must be included as Appendix F. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Taking the assessment of potential impacts into account, please provide an environmental impact statement that summarises the impact that the proposed activity and its alternatives may have on the environment after the management and mitigation of impacts have been taken into account, with specific reference to types of impact, duration of impacts, likelihood of potential impacts actually occurring and the significance of impacts. Alternative A (preferred alternative)
It is the opinion of EOH CES that this Basic Assessment Report contains sufficient information to allow DENC to make an informed decision. EOH CES therefore recommends that the application for Authorisation should be approved on condition that the recommended mitigation measures stated herein are effectively implemented.
Alternative B
Alternative C
No-go alternative (compulsory)
The no-go option for development entails that the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village development will not go ahead. This would be accompanied by the following impacts:
Loss of employment opportunities associated with the project.
Loss of potential economic opportunities and economic growth.
Eco-tourism opportunities associated with the project would be lost.
Without the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village, the local
community will not benefit from the direct job opportunities associated with its construction and
operation, while the district will miss out on the economic benefits of increased tourism opportunities
associated with the development. Finally, if the development does not take place, the site will
continue to be mined illegally and used for grazing land, leading to further degradation and ultimate
loss of tourism opportunities associated with the areas natural beauty.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
66
SECTION E. RECOMMENDATION OF PRACTITIONER
Is the information contained in this report and the documentation attached hereto sufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for (in the view of the environmental assessment practitioner)?
YES NO
If “NO”, indicate the aspects that should be assessed further as part of a Scoping and EIA process before a decision can be made (list the aspects that require further assessment).
N/A
If “YES”, please list any recommended conditions, including mitigation measures that should be considered for inclusion in any authorisation that may be granted by the competent authority in respect of the application.
All mitigation measures recommended in the document should be considered and included.
Is an EMPr attached? YES NO
The EMPr must be attached as Appendix G. The details of the EAP who compiled the BAR and the expertise of the EAP to perform the Basic Assessment process must be included as Appendix H. If any specialist reports were used during the compilation of this BAR, please attach the declaration of interest for each specialist in Appendix I. Any other information relevant to this application and not previously included must be attached in Appendix J. ________________________________________ NAME OF EAP ________________________________________ _________________ SIGNATURE OF EAP DATE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
67
SECTION F: APPENDIXES The following appendixes must be attached:
Cadastral map illustrating the position of the proposed Gong-Gong development.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
68
Appendix A: Maps
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
69
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
70
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
71
Appendix B: Photographs As the development is spread out over a large area, the usual method of taking eight pictures in the main compass directions is unsuitable. Below are pictures illustrating the areas proposed for each activity on site. Boardwalk Location
Braai Area Location
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
72
Hang Bridge
Panoramic Views
Panoramic view 1: Proposed location of the Lodge.
28°30'32.26"S 24°23'40.93"E
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
73
Panoramic view 1: Proposed location of the conference centre.
28°30'52.12"S 24°23'27.05"E
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
74
Appendix C: Facility illustration(s)
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
75
Appendix D: Specialist reports (including terms of reference) None
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
76
Appendix E 1: Advertisements and Notices
Sign places at the entrance of Access Road 1 Sign places at the entrance of Access Road 2
Figure illustrating the Notice signs places at the entrance to the access roads leading to the proposed site for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
77
Appendix E 2: Stakeholder Notification
Figure illustrating the email together with attached Background Information Document and Notification letter sent to all I&AP’s.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
78
I&AP database
Organisation Name Email Tel Cell Postal Address
Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation (DENC) Ms Dineo Moleko [email protected] 0538077430
Northern Cape DWS Mr Buyisile July [email protected] 053 836 7600 0828975114 Private Bag X 6101 / KIMBERLEY / 8300
Dikgatlong Tourism Association Mr Jabu Hayes [email protected] 0820551818
COGHSTA Ms Joey Botes [email protected] 0605467557
Frances Baard District Municipality Ms Joh-ne Jansen [email protected] 0538380911
Frances Baard District Municipality Mr Lebogang Molefi [email protected] 0538380911
Frances Baard District Municipality Mr N. Thompson [email protected] 0538380911
Frances Baard District Municipality Mr Mc Donald Booysen [email protected] 0723703716
Frances Baard District Municipality Mr Basil Louw [email protected] 0538380939
Frances Baard District Municipality Ms Samantha Alfonse [email protected] 0538380911
McGregor Museum Mr David Morris [email protected] 0538311761 0822224777
Dikgatlong Ward 5 Councelor Mr Martin Hendricks [email protected] 0828229272
Dikgatlong Ward Committee Ms Maureen Mgoma [email protected] 0727892838
Dikgatlong Ward Committee Ms Mary Scheepers 0737308654
Dikgatlong Local Municipality Ms Claudia Letsie [email protected] 0535310671 0827161085
Dikgatlong Local Municipality Mr Eddie Manuel [email protected] 0535316500 0825213149
Gong-Gong CPA Chairman Mr Corrie Solomans [email protected] 053-8731885 0823150215
PNIEL CPA Chairman Mr G.J Phashe [email protected] 0823315297
Gong-Gong Community Ms Wendy Carvel NO EMAIL ADDRESS 0795813171 PO Box 183, Gong-Gong, Barkly West, 8376
Gong-Gong Community Mr John Carvel NO EMAIL ADDRESS 0795813171 PO Box 183, Gong-Gong, Barkly West, 8376
Gong-Gong Community Ms Elizabeth Malan [email protected] 0783135607
Gong-Gong Community Mr Derek Oliphant NO EMAIL ADDRESS 0768883760 PO Box 183, Gong-Gong, Barkly West, 8375
Gong-Gong Community Mr Xavier Jood [email protected] 0848508536
Gong-Gong Community Mr Willian Chabalala 0844444473
Gong-Gong CDC Mr H.U Drift 0720481810
Gong-Gong Community Ms Val Drift [email protected] 0726684117
One Fountain B&B Ms Telana van Zyl [email protected] 0827943126
Gong-Gong Community Mr Edward Snyders 0723422587
Farm Number Farm Name/Nr Name Email Tel Cell Postal Address Title Deed
Landowners
Farm 282 KIESER, JACOBUS FRANCOIS P O BOX 1416, SABIE, 1260 T1084/1967
Farm 282 Roos, Mabel T1084/1967
Farm 282 H.J Kock [email protected] 0722891955
283 portion 2 Gong-Gong DIKGATLONG [email protected] 0726040009 Private Bag X5, Barkly West, 8375 T909/2003
PLAAS 284 DIKGATLONG [email protected] 0726040009 Private Bag X5, Barkly West, 8375 T909/2003
PLAAS 284 Portion 1 BERLIN MISSION SOC ORANGE SYNOD [email protected] 0538731885 0823150215 T11512/1910
Farm 372 Bad Hope GONG GONG COMMUNAL PROP [email protected] 0823315297 T1952/2012
Farm 1/281 PNIEL (Portion 1) COMMITTEE OF BERLIN MISSION [email protected] 0538731885 0823150215 T1118/1970
Farm 371 Gong-Gong (portion 0-remaining extent) DIKGATLONG [email protected] 0726040009 Private Bag X5, Barkly West, 8375 T909/2003
Farm Number Name Email Tel Cell Postal Address
Surrounding Landowners
Farm 280 THAN (Portion 0-remaining extent) COSGROVE, DAVID DAWSON P O BOX 72020, PARKVIEW,2122 T1360/1997
Farm 280 THAN (Portion 0-remaining extent) HOLMES, ALISTAIR GORDON DEAN P O BOX 121, DELPORTSHOOP, 8377 T1360/1997
Farm 280 THAN (portion 1) REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA T2079/1989
Farm 281 PNIEL (portion 0-remaining extent) NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA T432/2008
Farm 371 Gong-Gong (portion 1) TRANSNET LTD [email protected]/[email protected] PO Box 876, Keimoes, 8860 T3817/1992
I &APS
Stakeholders
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
79
Appendix E 3: Comments and Response DRAFT BAR not yet released for public comment.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
80
Appendix E 4: Authority Participation
Completed as part of Appendix E2.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
81
Appendix E 5: Registered I&AP’s DRAFT BAR not yet released for public comment.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
82
Appendix E 6: Meetings A feasibility study focus group meeting was held at Barkly West library on 17th March 2016
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
83
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
84
Appendix F: Impact Assessment ISSUES AND IMPACTS DURING THE PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE OF THE PROPOSED GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT.
PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance
Pre-mitigation
Mitigation Significance
Post-
mitigation
Environmental Legal and Policy compliance
During the planning and design phase,
failure to adhere to relevant
environmental regulations and
legislation could lead to the project
conflicting with local, provincial and
national policies, legislation etc. This
could result in lack of institutional
support for the project, overall project
failure and undue disturbance to the
natural environment
Direct Long term Localised Probable Severe HIGH
NEGATIVE
The planning and design of the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must take into account, and comply with all relevant environmental legislation and policy.
In addition, planning for the construction and operation of the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must take into account and consider any available best practice guidelines.
LOW
NEGATIVE
Ecological Impacts
Permanent loss of indigenous
vegetation
During the planning and design phase,
poor planning and placement of all
development and infrastructure may
result in unnecessary damage and
disturbance to natural vegetation
Direct Permanen
t
Localised Definite Moderatel
y severe
MODERATE
NEGATIVE
An Environmental Control Officer must be consulted in the detailed planning and design of infrastructure in order to minimise the disturbance of natural vegetation for the development.
All species of special concern, protected or vulnerable must be avoided or transplanted.
Rehabilitation with grasses found on site, in addition to local shade-loving
LOW
NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
85
PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance
Pre-mitigation
Mitigation Significance
Post-
mitigation
(Kimberly Thornveld) grasses, must be undertaken.
Disturbance of sensitive areas
During the planning and design phase,
poor layout design (i.e. inappropriate
utilisation of sensitive systems such as
the Vaal River and riparian vegetation)
increases the risk of erosion and
degradation of watercourses and
associated habitats.
Direct/Indire
ct
Long term Study area Possible Moderatel
y severe
HIGH
NEGATIVE
The Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development project layout must be designed to ensure that the minimum disturbance of sensitive areas such as the watercourse is achieved as far as is reasonable and practical.
The Lodge and concerence venue must not be located within flood prone areas.
A buffer of at least 50m must be maintained around the river and any indigenous riparian vegetation.
Any activity (building of bridges and boardwalks etc) within 32m of the Vaal River will require a Water Use License.
LOW
NEGATIVE
Sanitation
During the planning and design, poor
planning with regards to the resorts’
sanitation requirements may result in a
breakdown of the system or overflows
of sewage causing contamination of the
surrounding environment and water
resource.
Direct Long term Localised Possible Severe HIGH
NEGATIVE
The sewage treatment system must be situated at least 100m away from the 100 year flood line.
The sewage treatment system must have the capacity to contain overflows.
The system design must be able to easily deal with the facility’s sanitation requirements even during peak season.
Sanitation designs must be submitted to the DWS for approval, and a Water Use Authorisation must be obtained if required.
LOW
NEGATIVE
Surface water runoff
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
86
PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance
Pre-mitigation
Mitigation Significance
Post-
mitigation
Storm water management
During the planning and design phase,
failure to plan properly for storm water
(e.g. inadequate planning for storm
water drainage and routing of storm
water flow, resulting from increased
hard surface area and subsequent
increase in quantity and velocity of
runoff) could result in uncontrolled
storm water runoff which can cause
flooding and erosion and also result in
contamination of surface water and
groundwater resources.
Direct/Indire
ct
Long term Localised/
nearby
watercourse
Possible Slightly
severe
MODERATE
NEGATIVE
The proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must be located at least 50m away from the river and any other watercourses.
A Storm water Management Plan must be designed and implemented to ensure maximum water seepage at the source of water flow. The plan must also include management mitigation measures for water pollution, waste water management and the management of surface erosion e.g. by considering the applicability of contouring, etc.
The Storm water Management Plan must be designed by a qualified engineer.
LOW
NEGATIVE
River crossing
During the planning and design phase, the inappropriate design of the proposed hang bridge across the Vaal River could lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.
Direct Medium-Term
Water catchment
Probable Moderately Severe
HIGH NEGATIVE
The planning and design of the river crossing must be located in an area least prone to erosion, and take into account the ability for bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization.
The bridge design should minimize the anchor point area as much as is safely possible.
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Management of waste
During the planning and design phase,
inappropriate planning for management
and disposal of waste could result in
Direct/
Indirect
Short
term
Localised Possible Moderatel
y severe
MODERATE
NEGATIVE A waste management plan for handling
onsite waste must be developed and implemented.
LOW
NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
87
PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance
Pre-mitigation
Mitigation Significance
Post-
mitigation
surface and ground water
contamination. An appropriate area where waste can be
stored before disposal must be designated.
Siting of structures
During the planning and design phase,
poor planning for the siting of the
sewage treatment infrastructure could
result in inadvertent spillage or run-off
of effluent into the river.
Direct Long term Localised Possible Severe HIGH
NEGATIVE The sewage treatment infrastructure
must be situated at least 50m away from the 100 year flood line.
The system must have adequate capacity to contain overflows.
LOW
NEGATIVE
Landscape and visual
During the planning and design phase,
inappropriate architectural design or
lack of aesthetic considerations may
result in aesthetic impacts on the
currently open landscape.
Direct/
Indirect/
Cumulative
Long term Localised Probable Moderate
to slight
LOW
NEGATIVE
Sighting and scale of structures:
An independent Environmental Control Office (ECO) must assist in the sighting of development.
An appropriate environmentally and visually sensitive architectural and aesthetics code must be developed to limit visual intrusion of the built form.
Building heights should preferably be restricted to single storey, and tucked into the landscape.
Architectural guidelines must be formulated with a view to blending buildings into the landscape through selection of specific materials and colours. Natural materials should be adopted if possible (e.g. stone, wood, etc.) and roof and wall colours must be natural (greens, browns and greys).
LOW
NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
88
PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance
Pre-mitigation
Mitigation Significance
Post-
mitigation
Screening measures: Appropriate indigenous tree species must be planted to create visual screen for all structures.
Storage of hazardous substances
During the planning and design phase,
inappropriate planning for the storage
of hazardous substances such as
diesel, paint, pesticides etc., used
onsite could lead to surface and ground
water pollution (e.g. due to oil leaks,
spillage of diesel etc.). In addition,
these hazardous substances could be
washed off into the nearby
watercourse.
Direct/Indire
ct
Short
term
Localised/
nearby
watercourse
Possible Slight LOW
NEGATIVE All hazardous substances such as
paints, diesel and cement must be stored in a bunded area with an impermeable surface beneath them.
The developer must designate appropriate areas for the storage of hazardous substances.
LOW
NEGATIVE
Traffic and Transport
During the planning and design phase, inappropriate routing of internal roads through or close to watercourses could lead to unnecessary impacts on riparian vegetation.
Direct Long-Term
Localised Probable Moderately Severe
MODERATE NEGATIVE
All internal roads should be located at least 50m away from any watercourse. Where unavoidable, roads must avoid sensitive areas.
If located within 32m of a watercourse, the construction of such a road will require a Water Use License (WUL).
LOW NEGATIVE
Technology employed
During the planning and design phase, failure to consider technologies that reduce consumption of natural
Direct Long-term Surrounding areas and
downstream
Possible Moderate MODERATE NEGATIVE
Water:
Rainwater tanks should be considered in the design and planning phase. Tanks
LOW NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
89
PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance
Pre-mitigation
Mitigation Significance
Post-
mitigation
resources (particularly water and electricity) will result in lost opportunity to conserve resources.
will reduce the runoff created by the housing footprint and reduce municipal water usage.
Water piping material and infrastructure must comply with SABS to insure as far as possible pipeline failures and future indirect impacts resulting from burst pipes do not result in water loss.
Energy:
Insulation of houses and use of solar water heaters should be considered.
Use of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power (PV) should be considered in the design and layout. However, if renewable energy technology is not implemented initially, provisions should be made in design to allow for easier post-construction retrofitting.
ISSUES AND IMPACTS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROPOSED GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT.
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-
mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
90
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-
mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
Environmental Legal and Policy compliance
During the construction phase the failure of the contractor to implement mitigation measures can result in non-compliance with the EA and EMPr.
Indirect Short-Term Provincial Possible Severe HIGH NEGATIVE The developer must employ an independent Environmental Control Officer (ECO) for the construction phase to ensure that construction is implemented according to specifications in the EA and EMPr.
MODERATE
NEGATIVE
Ecological Impacts
Loss of indigenous vegetation during
construction
During the construction phase,
unnecessary damage and loss of
natural and vulnerable vegetation
(Kimberly Thornveld and riparian
vegetation) as well as heritage sites
beyond the development footprint my
result due to uncontrolled construction
activities.
Direct Short term Localised Probable Severe HIGH NEGATIVE The final design and layout must reviewed by the appointed ECO to ensure compliance with the approved layout.
Construction activities and vegetation removal must be limited to the developmental footprint to avoid unnecessary loss of vegetation and soil erosion.
Where vegetation has been cleared, site rehabilitation in terms of soil stabilisation and re-vegetation must be undertaken.
Prior to construction, all sensitive areas (including heritage sites) located near areas where development is planned must be demarcated, and signs erected to ensure these areas are maintained. This must be done with the assistance of the ECO.
Indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metre (10 m) buffer zone must be
LOW
NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
91
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-
mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
maintained from the forest vegetation.
During the construction phase, land disturbance can lead to increased spreading of noxious weeds and invasive alien plants.
Direct Medium-Term
Localised Possible Moderately severe
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Alien plants must be removed from the site through appropriate methods e.g. hand pulling, chemical, cutting, etc., and under the supervision of the ECO.
After construction, exposed areas must be rehabilitated with indigenous vegetation.
Post-construction monitoring of rehabilitation must be implemented.
LOW NEGATIVE
During the construction phase, there is the potential risk of poaching of indigenous wild animals by staff employed by the contractor
Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderately severe
MODERATE NEGATIVE
All staff employed during construction must undergo environmental induction training.
No construction workers should reside onsite.
LOW NEGATIVE
During the construction phase, soil exposure due to clearing of land may result in erosion, which in turn may cause sedimentation of the watercourses
Direct Medium-Term
Localised and water catchment
Possible Moderate MODERATE NEGATIVE
Wind screening and storm water control should be undertaken to prevent soil erosion during construction.
All erosion control mechanisms must be regularly maintained.
Vegetation must be retained where possible to avoid soil erosion.
Construction must be phased in order to minimize the area of exposed soil at any one time.
Re-vegetation of disturbed surfaces must occur immediately after the construction activities are completed with indigenous vegetation.
LOW NEGATIVE
Sanitation
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
92
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-
mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
During the construction phase, the lack of appropriate sanitation facilities for construction workers could lead to the contamination of ground and ground water.
Direct Short-Term Localised and water catchment
Possible Moderate MODERATE NEGATIVE
Adequate sanitary and ablutions facilities must be provided for construction workers
The facilities must be regularly serviced to reduce the risk of surface or groundwater pollution.
Portable toilets must not be located within 50 meters of any watercourse.
LOW NEGATIVE
Surface water runoff
During the construction phase, runoff of
storm water containing contaminants,
silt and litter may contaminate the
surrounding environment.
Direct/Indi
rect
Short term Watercourse Possible Moderately
severe
MODERATE
NEGATIVE During construction the site must be
managed in a manner that prevents pollution of drains, downstream watercourses or groundwater, due to suspended solids, silt or chemical pollutants.
Litter must be controlled on site.
Temporary cut-off drains and berms may be required to capture storm water and promote infiltration.
Hazardous substances must be stored at least 100m away from any water bodies on site to avoid pollution.
LOW
NEGATIVE
Stream crossing
During the construction phase, the building of a bridge across the watercourse could lead to soil erosion and downstream sedimentation of the watercourse.
Direct Medium-Term
Localised and water catchment
Probable Moderately Severe
HIGH NEGATIVE The construction of the bridge must take place in the shortest possible time period and during the low rainfall season.
Bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization must be implemented once construction is complete and must
MODERATE
NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
93
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-
mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
include the use of gabions for bank stabilization.
Management of waste
Construction rubble left onsite may
attract vermin and encourage the
growth of opportunistic alien vegetation.
Pollution potential if construction waste
is not adequately disposed of (i.e. left
on site).
Direct/Indi
rect
Short term Localised Possible Moderately
severe
MODERATE
NEGATIVE An environmental management
programme incorporating waste management issues during the construction phase of the project must be developed and implemented.
Refuse from the construction site must be collected on a regular basis and deposited at an appropriate landfill site.
All construction materials must be stored in a central and secure location with controlled access with an appropriate impermeable surface.
LOW
NEGATIVE
During construction there is the potential risk of littering on and around the site by the contractor, which can become unsightly and in some cases lead to health risks.
Direct Short-Term Localised and water catchment
Probable Moderately severe
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Construction personnel must be educated in appropriate waste management practices.
Collected waste must be separated and stored by type when feasible.
Litter and construction waste must be removed on a regular basis and disposed of in an approved registered landfill.
Potentially hazardous materials must be handled and stored onsite in secure containers and disposed of at an appropriately permitted hazardous waste disposal site
The Contractor should maintain a register of the hazardous materials and
LOW NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
94
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-
mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
should document the use, storage, final destination and method of disposal.
During the construction phase there is the potential for the inappropriate disposal of construction material off-site and subsequently polluting the environment.
Indirect Medium-Term
Community Probable Moderate MODERATE NEGATIVE
Construction material must be removed to an approved, licenced off-site disposal site by the appointment of a reputable waste services provider.
LOW NEGATIVE
Management of hazardous substances
During the construction phase inappropriate storage and disposal of hazardous building material may pollute the soil and ground water.
Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderately severe
MODERATE NEGATIVE
The storage of potentially hazardous material must be controlled to reduce the risk of environmental contamination.
Drip trays must be placed under all machinery to avoid soil contamination.
All vehicles and machinery must be regularly maintained and in good working order to reduce the risk of contamination of soil and ground water.
All areas that have been contaminated during the construction phase must be rehabilitated.
LOW NEGATIVE
Concrete Batching
During the construction phase inappropriate cement mixing techniques can lead to ground and ground water pollution
Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderately severe
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Cement and concrete must not be mixed directly on the ground, or during rainfall events when the potential for transport of pollutants to watercourses is the greatest. Cement and concrete must only be mixed in the area demarcated for this purpose and on an impermeable substratum.
LOW NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
95
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-
mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
All construction water and contaminated runoff must be directed away from the drainage line.
Traffic and Access Routes
During the construction phase, increased use of access roads by heavy machinery will cause further degradation to the gravel tracks.
Direct Medium-Term
Along road Probable Moderately severe
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Road maintenance should take place regularly, especially after heavy rains.
LOW NEGATIVE
On-site Fires
During the construction phase, fires started at construction camps could result in uncontrolled fires, posing a threat to wild animals, indigenous vegetation and the surrounding landowners.
Direct Short-Term Community Possible Severe HIGH NEGATIVE All onsite fires must be controlled.
The construction personnel must be educated regarding fire and fire management.
Fire extinguishers must be available onsite.
In order to reduce the risk of fires: o All flammable substances must
be stored in dry areas which do not pose an ignition risk to the said substances.
o Smoking must not be permitted near flammable substances.
o All cooking must be done in demarcated areas that are safe in terms of runaway or uncontrolled fires.
LOW NEGATIVE
Socio-economic impacts
During the construction phase, there may be temporary job-creation for members of the community.
Indirect Short-Term
Localised Probable Beneficial MODERATE POSITIVE
No mitigation provided MODERATE POSITIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
96
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-
mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
During the construction phase increased number of labourers could lead to an increase in security risks in the community.
Indirect Short-Term
Community Possible Moderately severe
MODERATE NEGATIVE
Access control to the site must ensure no unauthorised person shall enter.
The site must be secured in order to reduce the opportunity for the criminal activity in the locality of the construction site.
LOW NEGATIVE
ISSUES AND IMPACTS DURING THE OPERATIONAL PHASE OF THE PROPOSED GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT.
OPERATIONAL PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance
Pre-mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
Ecological Impacts
During the operational phase, the inappropriate disturbance of land may increase spreading of noxious weeds, invasive and alien plants in the development open space area and surrounds.
Direct Medium-Term
Localised Possible Moderately severe
MODERATE NEGATIVE
The facility operator must monitor disturbed sites for erosion and the spread of alien vegetation etc. and implement remedial actions.
LOW NEGATIVE
Sanitation
During the operational phase, if the
sewage treatment facility is not
adequately maintained, effluent of poor
quality may be released into the
Direct Medium-
Term
Localised Possible Severe HIGH
NEGATIVE
No treated effluent may be discharged into any watercourse.
Ground water monitoring boreholes must be regularly tested for possible contamination of groundwater.
LOW
NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
97
OPERATIONAL PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance
Pre-mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
environment, contaminating water
sources with nutrient and faecal
coliforms.
Effluent quality must, as a minimum, be analysed quarterly to confirm the effectiveness of the treatment technology, and effluent samples and results submitted to FBDM Sanitation Department.
Appropriate corrective actions must be taken if contamination is detected or effluent quality does not meet discharge standards.
The approved maintenance plan must be implemented.
Surface water runoff
During the operational phase the failure to maintain storm water management measures may result in soil erosion and stream sedimentation.
Direct Long-Term Localised and water catchment
Probable Severe HIGH NEGATIVE
The effectiveness of the flood attenuation and storm water management measures must be monitored.
The effectiveness of attenuation berms that are situated 32 m above the watercourse must be monitored.
If the storm water management measures put in place are deemed insufficient, alternative measures should be drawn up by a qualified engineer and approved by DENC and DWS before being implemented.
MODERATE
NEGATIVE
Management of waste
During the operational phase inappropriate waste storage and disposal practices may lead to litter,
Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Severe MODERATE NEGATIVE
Waste must be properly managed by separating compostable waste, and providing storage for recyclable waste
LOW NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
98
OPERATIONAL PHASE
Impact Description Nature of
impact
Duration Spatial
extent
Likelihood Severity Significance
Pre-mitigation
Mitigation Significan
ce Post-
mitigation
pollution, general nuisances and health hazards.
materials and wastes which must be disposed of into a licensed landfill.
Technology employed
During the operational phase, increased water and energy consumption may lead to a loss in natural resources such as water and energy.
Direct Long-Term Provincial Definite Severe HIGH NEGATIVE
Measures must be taken to reduce the consumption of natural resources.
These measures should include, but not be limited to, the installation of rainwater tanks to reduce storm water runoff and the pressure on the municipal water supply, as well as alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar (PV) power.
MODERATE
NEGATIVE
Socio-economic impacts
During the operational phase there may be increased employment opportunities and stimulation of the local economy.
Indirect Long-Term Community Probable Beneficial MODERATE POSITIVE
No mitigation provided. MODERATE POSITIVE
During the operational phase, there may be potential long-term increases of neighbouring land value.
Indirect Medium-Term
Community Possible UNKNOWN
MODERATE POSITIVE
No mitigation provided. MODERATE POSITIVE
ISSUES AND IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE “NO-GO” ALTERNATIVE
“NO-GO” ALTERNATIVE
Impact Description Nature of Impact
Duration Spatial extent
Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-mitigation
Mitigation Significance
Post-mitigation
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
99
Degradation and misuse of site due to possible mining and poor land use management.
Direct Medium-Term Community Probable Moderate MODERATE NEGATIVE
No mitigation provided. MODERATE
NEGATIVE
All negative activities from the proposed development will be avoided
Direct Long-Term Community Probable Moderate MODERATE POSITIVE
No mitigation provided. MODERATE POSITIVE
Construction job losses Direct Short-Term Localised Definite Moderate MODERATE NEGATIVE
No mitigation provided. MODERATE
NEGATIVE
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
100
Appendix G: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
101
Appendix H: Details of EAP and expertise 1.1 Details of the EAP
Dr Alan Carter
Alan is the executive of the EOH East London Office. He holds a PhD in Marine Biology and is a
certified Public Accountant, with extensive training and experience in both financial accounting and
environmental science disciplines with international accounting firms in South Africa and the USA. He
has 25 years’ experience in environmental management and has specialist skills in sanitation, coastal
environments and industrial waste. Dr Carter is registered as a Professional Natural Scientist under the
South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP). He is also registered as an EAP
by the Environmental Assessment Practitioners of South Africa (EAPSA).
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
102
1.2 Expertise of the study team
EOH Coastal and Environmental Services (EOH) was established in 1990 as a specialist environmental
consulting company and has considerable experience in terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecology, the
Social Impact Assessment (SIA) process, State of Environment Reporting (SOER), Integrated Waste
Management Plans (IWMP), Environmental Management Programme (EMPr), Spatial Development
Frameworks (SDF), public participation, as well as the management and co-ordination of all aspects of
the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
processes. EOH has been active in all of the above fields, and in so doing have made a positive
contribution towards environmental management and sustainable development in the Eastern Cape,
South Africa and many other African countries. We believe that a balance between development and
environmental protection can be achieved by skilful, considerate and careful planning.
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
103
Appendix I: Specialist’s declaration of interest No specialist studies were conducted
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
104
Appendix J: Additional Information
N/A