governança na internet: um estudo de caso do marco civil da internet
TRANSCRIPT
Internet policy framing in emerging economies: a case study of Marco Civil da Internet, a Brazilian Law for
Internet Governance Soraia Herrador Costa Lima de Souza
[email protected]@soraialima
GigaNet 2016Guadalajara, MX
Introduction
Introduction
• April 23, 2014: Law 12,965 - known in Brazil as the Marco Civilof Internet.
• It is a law that establishes the principles, guarantees, rights andduties of Internet users in the country and was builtcollaboratively between the Federal Government and societythrough the use of the digital environment as a platform fordebate.
Introduction
• May, 2015: promulgation of the Law
• September, 2015: regulation of the Law
• January and February, 2016: debate about the regulation
• Last analysis: July, 2016.
The Use of Information and Communication Technologies in
the Establishment of a Democratic Environment
The Marco Civil da Internet:collaborative tools for debate
The Marco Civil da Internet:collaborative tools for debate
• e-Democracia
• Cultura Digital
• Debate Público
The Marco Civil da Internet:collaborative tools for debate• Law 12,965
• Main parameters for Internet use, rights and duties (users, connection service providers and apps).
• Four aspects:
• Net neutrality
• Freedom of speech
• Privacy
• Providers’ obligation
The Marco Civil da Internet:collaborative tools for debate
• February - May 2016:
• 339 schedules
• 1.109 comments
• Netvizz - Facebook
• Gephi
The Marco Civil da Internet:collaborative tools for debate
• Date of the last analysis: July 20, 2016. Date of the last post: May 12, 2016.
2015 2016
Posts 284 70
Links 940 344
Comments 2,645 844
The Marco Civil da Internet:collaborative tools for debate
• Weak links - low diversity in relationships
• Unique interactions (63% - 2015; 53,14% - 2016)
• Kimura et. al (2011): Support or rejection of an idea in a social network needs stimulation.
Figure 1 - Graph obtained from the data collected from Fanpage the Ministry of Justice in 2015. (Source: SOUZA, 2016)
Figure 2 - Graph obtained from the collected data Fanpage the Ministry of Justice from January to July 2016. (Source: SOUZA, 2016)
Final considerations
