graduate program in business information systems inventory decisions with certain factors aslı...
TRANSCRIPT
Graduate Program in Business Information Systems
Inventory Decisions with Certain Factors
Aslı Sencer
Aslı Sencer
A Retailer’s Plea
If I order too little, I make no profit. If I order too much, I may go broke. Every product is different. Help me!
Aslı Sencer
Why do we control inventory? Inventories represent a vast segment of total
economic activity. Even minor improvements can create large
savings.
How do we control inventory? Application of optimization techniques Information processing and retrieval
techniques
Aslı Sencer
Decisions of an inventory policy If there is no production, i.e., pure inventory
system How much to order? Order quantity When to order? Reorder quantity
Ex:Order Q=100 units when the inventory level drops to r=15 units.
If there is also production When to start/stop production?
Aslı Sencer
Elements of Inventory Decisions Costs:
Ordering and Procurement costs Inventory holding or carrying costs Inventory shortage costs
Demand structure How does it vary? Certain, uncertain?
Supply structure Any capacity limitations, defectives, number of suppliers?
Lead times: Certain, uncertain?
Aslı Sencer
Ordering and Procurement Costs Represent all expenses incurred in ordering or
manufacturing items related to Acquisition Transportation Collecting, sorting, placing the items in the storage Managerial and clerical costs associated with order
placement. Ordering costs are fixed, independent of the order size. Procurement costs depend on the order size.
Aslı Sencer
Holding or Carrying Costs Expenses incurred during the storage of items.
Physical Costs: Warehouse operation costs, insurence, property taxes.
Pilferage, spoilage, obsolescence Opportunity cost of investing in inventory rather
than investing somewhere else, ex. in a bank. Inventory costs are variable costs that depend
on the order size.
Aslı Sencer
Shortage Costs Occur whenever the demand is not satisfied.
Order is either “backordered” or “lost”. Backordering Costs:
Fixed cost of extra managerial work. Loss of customer goodwill: Variable cost that
depends on duration of backorder. Lost Sales Costs:
Marginal profit that the item would have earned. Loss of customer goodwill.
Aslı Sencer
Demand Structure Continuous versus discrete demand
Ex: Natural gas consumption in housesDetergent consumption in houses
Deterministic (certain) versus stochastic (uncertain) demandEx: Order quantities for the next months are 20,30,10,50.
Order quantities in a month are normally distributed with mean 25 and variance 4.
Constant versus dynamic demandEx: Demand quantities for the next months are 20, 21, 20, 19
Demand quantities for the next months are 20, 50, 10, 2
Aslı Sencer
Supply Structure Any defectives?
If the received lot includes defective items this brings uncertainty
Any capacity limitations?
Do we fully receive what we order? Number of suppliers, fixed or variable?
Aslı Sencer
Lead time Time elapsed between the order delivery and
order receipt. Can be constant or stochastic.
Ex: Lead time is 10 days.
Lead time is between 8-12 days.
Aslı Sencer
The Economic Order QuantityEOQ-Model
Decision variable: Q = Order Quantity Parameters:
k = Fixed cost per order ($/order)
A = Annual number of items demanded (unit/year)
c = Unit cost of procuring an item ($/unit)
h = Annual cost of holding a dollar in inventory ($/$/year) Objective is to “minimize total annual cost”.
Total=
Ordering+
Holding+
ProcurementAnnual cost Cost Cost Cost
Aslı Sencer
Assumptions of Classical EOQ Model Demand rate is constant or stable. There is infinite supply availability. Lead time is constant or zero.
No quantity discounts are made. All demand is met on time, no backordering, no
stockout.
Aslı Sencer
Costs of EOQ Model Total ordering cost is the number of orders times
the cost per order:
Total holding cost is the cost per item held 1 year times the average inventory:
The annual procurement cost is the product of annual demand and unit cost:
Procurement cost = Ac
kQA
cost ordering Annual
2cost holding Annual
Qhc
Aslı Sencer
Annual Cost of EOQ-Model
Here Ac is not a relevant cost and thus dropped.
Minimize Total Annual Inventory Cost:
AcQ
hckQA
2 cost annual Total
2 )(
Qhck
QA
QTC
Aslı Sencer
Optimal Solution of EOQ Optimal solution is the economic order quantity
Optimal Total Cost hc
AkQ
2 *
AkhcTC 2*
Aslı Sencer
Example:The House of Wines and Liquors
Allex Mullen decides that the first task in utilizing inventory models is to determine the value of model parameters:
Annual demand 5200 cases of beer $10 telephone charge for ordering Purchase cost is $1.5/case beer +shipping cost
$0.5/case 10%bank interest, 5%state franchise tax, 5% theft
insurance rateHow many should he order, how often, and at what annual relevant inventory cost?
Aslı Sencer
Solution:The economic order quantity is
The inventory cycle duration is T = Q/A = 510/5200 = 0.098 year or 36 days
The total annual relevant inventory cost is:
510or9.509220.
10520022 *
hc
AkQ
yearTC /96.203$00.10296.101$2
510)2(20.10
510
5200 (510)
Aslı Sencer
Robustness of EOQ Model EOQ is a robust model with respect to the
estimation errors in A, k, c or h. Let Aactual=4 Aestimated
Then EOQactual=2 Aestimated
Since
estimatedestimatedactual
actual EOQhc
kA
hc
kAEOQ 2
22
2
Aslı Sencer
Ex: The House of Wines and Liquors Alex Mullen applies EOQ to another product,
a particular variety of Chilean wine that sells 1000 cases annually. The cost is $20 per case. A telephone call to Chile to place an order costs $100. The holding costs are the same as for Tres Equis Beer.
Aslı Sencer
Ex:
224or 6.2232020.
100100022 *
hc
AkQ
T = Q/A = 24/1000 = .224 year or 82 days
ar$894.43/ye2
224)20(20.100
224
1000 (224)
TC
Aslı Sencer
Optimal Inventory Policywith BackorderingOrders placed during shortages are backordered.
Aslı Sencer
Optimal Inventory Policywith BackorderingS: Quantity on hand when a shipment arrives.P: Cost of being one item short for a year
Optimal order quantity and order level:
Q
SQpQ
hcSk
QA
S,QTC22
)(22
hcpp
hcAk
*Sp
hcphcAk
*Q
2
2
Aslı Sencer
Example:The House of Wines and Liquors-BackordersThe marketing department tells Alex that beer is a convenience product that can not be backordered, so sale is lost! However some wine customers are connoisseurs who are willing to order out-of-stock items. Nevertheless, the store owner will incur some penalty cost if there is a shortage of wine.
Suppose that retailer suffers lost profit on future business equal to $0.01/unit each day that a wine is on backorder. What should be the optimal ordering policy if backordering is allowed?
Solution: The order quantity is computed:
p = $.01×365 = $3.65/unit/year.
324
65.3
2020.65.3
2020.
100100022 *
p
hcp
hc
AkQ
Aslı Sencer
The order level S is
The relevant cost is
smaller than before, why?
154
2020.65.3
65.3
2020.
100100022 *
hcp
p
hc
AkS
82.6173242
17065.3
3242
1542020.100
324
1000 )154,324(
22
TC
Example: Solution
Aslı Sencer
Is backordering better? Fewer orders are placed when there is backordering. Average inventory level is smaller.
Backorders/cycle= Q* – S*=324 – 154 = 170 units/cycle.Proportion of demand not satisfied on time
=(Q*-S*)/Q*=170/324= 52.5%
The results suggest that:Retailers will run short in each cycle. But can they get away with it?
So backordering must make sense!
Aslı Sencer
Imputed Shortage PenaltyAn alternative approach for establishing an inventory policy is based on achieving a desired service level.
Service Level, L is the proportion of demand met on time
Imputed shortage penalty
p =hcL
1 L
S so ,1 ***
**
LQLQ
SQ
Aslı Sencer
As p increases EOQ is more robust
$36imputed shortage penalty
236
212
L=90%
EOQ with no backordering
P
324
154
224
L=47.5%
Q*
S*
$3.65
A=1000 units/yr k=$100/order c=$20/unit h= $0.20/$/year
Aslı Sencer
Economic Production-Quantity Model
The inventory model may be extended to finding the optimal production quantity.
Aslı Sencer
B: Annual production rate K: Production setup cost. c: Variable production cost per unit. Total Annual Cost:
Economic Production Quantity:
B
ABQhck
Q
AQTC
2 )(
BAB
hcAk
*Q 2
Economic Production-Quantity Model
Aslı Sencer
Example:Water Wheelies have annual demand of A =100,000 units and are made at the rate of B = 500,000 units. Production costs are k = $2,000/setup and c = $5/unit variable. It costs h = $.40/year to tie up a dollar.
Economic production quantity is
Total relevant cost is
TC(8,944) 56.516,29$000,500
000,100000,500
2
944,8540.000,2
944,8
000,100
units944,8500
100500
540.
210022 *
B
AB
hc
AkQ
Aslı Sencer
More Elaborate Models Incorporate a second one-time shortage penalty. Add additional products. Incorporate uncertainty regarding:
Demand Lead-time for delivery of order
Incorporate lost sales Extend to single period products
Aslı Sencer
Economic Order Quantity Model(Figure 15-3)
123456789
10111213141516
A B C D E F G H I
PROBLEM: House of Fine Wines and Liquors - Tres Equis Beer
Parameter Values:Fixed Cost per Order: k = 10.00$ Annual Number of Items Demanded: A = 5,200 Unit Cost of Procuring an Item: c = 2.00$ Annual Holding Cost per Dollar Value: h = 0.20$
Decision Variables:Order Quantity: Q = 100
Results:Total Annual Relevant Cost: TC = 540.00$ Time Between Orders (years): T = 0.0192
INVENTORY ANALYSIS - ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY MODEL
1516
F=(F7/F12)*F6+F9*F8*(F12/2)=F12/F7
Aslı Sencer
Sensitivity Analysis(Figure 15-6)
12345678910111213141516
A B C D E F G H I
PROBLEM: Sensitivity Analysis for House of Fine Wines and Liquors - Chilean Wines
Parameter Values:Fixed Cost per Order: k = 50.00$ 100.00$ 150.00$ 200.00$ Annual Number of Items Demanded: A = 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Unit Cost of Procuring an Item: c = 20.00$ 20.00$ 20.00$ 20.00$ Annual Holding Cost per Dollar Value: h = 0.20$ 0.20$ 0.20$ 0.20$
Decision Variables:Order Quantity: Q = 158.1 223.6 273.9 316.2
Results:Total Annual Relevant Cost: TC = 632.46$ 894.43$ 1,095.45$ 1,264.91$ Time Between Orders (years): T = 0.16 0.22 0.27 0.32
INVENTORY ANALYSIS - ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY MODEL
Aslı Sencer
Graphing the Sensitivity Analysis (Figure 15-7)
Sensitivity Analysis
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
$50 $100 $150 $200
Fixed Cost per Order, k
Un
its fo
r Q
* a
nd
D
olla
rs fo
r T
C(Q
*)
Order Quantity, Q*
TC(Q*)
Aslı Sencer
Backordering Model(Figure 15-9)
123456789
101112131415161718
A B C D E F G H I J
PROBLEM: House of Fine Wines and Liquors - Chilean Wine
Parameter Values:Fixed Cost per Order: k = 100.00$ Annual Number of Items Demanded: A = 1,000 Unit Cost of Procuring an Item: c = 20.00$ Annual Holding Cost per Dollar Value: h = 0.20$ Annual Cost of Being Short One Item: p = 3.65$
Decision Variables:Economic Order Quantity: Q = 324Economic Order Level: S = 154
Results:Total Annual Relevant Cost: TC = 617.82$ Time Between Orders (years): T = 0.32
INVENTORY ANALYSIS - ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY MODEL WITH BACKORDERING
13
14
F
=SQRT((2*$F$7*$F$6)/($F$9*$F$8))*SQRT(($F$10+$F$9*$F$8)/$F$10)
=SQRT((2*$F$7*$F$6)/($F$9*$F$8))*SQRT($F$10/($F$10+$F$9*$F$8))
13
14
F
13
14
F
=SQRT((2*$F$7*$F$6)/($F$9*$F$8))*SQRT(($F$10+$F$9*$F$8)/$F$10)
=SQRT((2*$F$7*$F$6)/($F$9*$F$8))*SQRT($F$10/($F$10+$F$9*$F$8))
1718
F=($F$7/$F$13)*$F$6+$F$9*$F$8*(($F$14^2)/(2*F13))+((F10*(F13-F14)^2/(2*F13)))=F13/F7
17
F=($F$7/$F$13)*$F$6+$F$9*$F$8*(($F$14^2)/(2*F13))+((F10*(F13-F14)^2/(2*F13)))
Aslı Sencer
Production Model (Figure 15-13)
123456789
101112131415161718
A B C D E F G H I
PROBLEM: Lambda Optics
Parameter Values:Fixed Set-Up Cost per Run: k = 5,000.00$ Annual Number of Items Demanded: A = 100,000 Annual Production Rate: B = 200,000 Variable Production Cost per Unit: c = 10.00$ Annual Holding Cost per Dollar Value: h = 0.20$
Decision Variables:Economic Production Quantity: Q = 31,623
Results:Time Between Production Runs (year): T = 0.32 Duration of Production Run (year): T1 = 0.16 Total Annual Relevant Cost: TC = 31,623$
INVENTORY ANALYSIS - ECONOMIC PRODUCTION-QUANTITY MODEL
13
F
=SQRT((2*F7*F6)/(F10*F9))*SQRT((F8)/(F8-F7))
1617
18
F=F13/F7=F13/F8
=(F7/F13)*F6+F10*F9*(F13/2)*((F8-F7)/F8)