grand canyon stratigraphy - weeblychristinatinsley.weebly.com/uploads/7/8/1/2/78125300/… · web...
TRANSCRIPT
Running head: Grand canyon 1
Grand Canyon Stratigraphy
Christina Tinsley
Southern Utah University
Grand canyon 2
Grand Canyon Stratigraphy
The Grand Staircase is a series of five monoclines that form the steps of the staircase.
Stretching from the North Rim of the Grand Canyon in Arizona all the way to central Utah in
Bryce Canyon. From the inner gorge of the Grand Canyon to the majestic spires of Bryce
Canyon, the staircase is truly one of the wonders of the world. Earth’s geologic history is
displayed like a stratigraphic clock, from the Precambrian all the way through the Cenozoic.
The Grand Staircase was not formed in a peaceful, static setting. Some layers of rock
were deposited, only to be eroded away their history never to seen. Others were twisted,
deformed, fractured, buried, metamorphosed, uplifted, in a dynamic series of events that would
form the stratigraphy we see today. http://www.earthscienceeducation.org/Da-
HamblinGurgelEtcAtlasPages/Hamblin2004-p085-GrStaircaseSchematic.jpg
The five steps of the staircase are named primarily for their color. Starting with the oldest
the Chocolate Cliffs, and working up
to the Vermillion cliffs, white Cliffs,
Gray Cliffs, and ending with the Pink
Cliffs. The base of the Chocolate
Cliffs is made up of the Permian age
Kaibab Limestone, the top most layer
of the Grand Canyon.
In order to understand the
formation of the Grand Staircase, you have to go back to the to the formation of the Precambrian
and Paleozoic that form the basement of the last step. The Grand Canyon is one of the greatest
geologic wonders of the world. It is one of those rare places where the geologic of the Colorado
Figure 1. Accretion Terranes in Western North America.http://www.earthscienceeducation.org/Da-HamblinGurgelEtcAtlasPages/Hamblin2004-p085-GrStaircaseSchematic.jpg
Grand canyon 3
Plateau history can be seen in one place. Both the Precambrian and entire Proterozoic can be
seen in the strata of the canyon. Each layer documents both the depositional environment and the
tectonic history in which it was formed. For this reason, it truly is a geologist’s playground.
Precambrian
The oldest rocks in the canyon date back to the late Precambrian Era, in the Proterozoic
Eon. They were formed approximately 1840 to 1710 million years ago. The basement rocks of
the canyon are the remnants of oceanic plates converging on the ancient North American cratons.
The west is made up of the accretion of volcanic arcs and
oceanic terranes, colliding with North America along
convergent plate boundaries. As pressure increased the rock
and sediment was compressed and folded, some to great
depths. A mountain range some five to six miles high is
thought to have formed during this time of orogenesis. The
basement rocks were heated and deformed at extremely high
temperatures, yielding metamorphic gneisses and schists.
Interweaving between the gneiss and schist, magma was
pushed up between the weaknesses in the rock and later
cooled intrusively to become Zoroaster Granite. These
metamorphic and intrusive volcanic rocks are referred to as the Grand Canyon Metamorphic
Suite. Exposed to the elements the mountain range was continuously eroded. As erosion lowered
the elevation and weight of the mountains, isostatic uplift buoyed up the once buried
metamorphic rocks to the surface once again. This period of erosion and lack of new deposition
marks the first unconformity in the stratigraphy of the canyon (Foos, 1999).
Figure 2. Accretionary Terranes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TransHudson_orogeny#/media/File:Wyoming,_Mojave,_Yavapai,_Mazatzal,_Trans-Hudson.gif
Grand canyon 4
The Grenville Province collided with North America at approximately 1.4 to 1.0 Ga. The
Grenville Orogeny (see figure 1) created an intracratonic basin on the back side of the orogeny
and generated east-west extensional normal faults. The Grand Canyon Super Group, starting with
the Unkar Group were deposited in this low lying basin. Limestones; representing an offshore
setting, shale; representing a nearshore setting, and sandstone; representing a continental beach
setting were deposited as sea levels rose and fell. The entire formation is riddled with magmatic
intrusions, yet the Super Group has not been metamorphosed. The Shinumo Quartzite found in
the super group is not in fact a traditional quartzite. The cement that bonded it together has a very
high silica content, making it as hard as a true quartzite without ever being subjected to
metamorphosis.
The Grand Canyon Super Group is widely studied by geologists, because after deposition
there was a vast period of non-deposition and erosion. There are only small pockets where the
formations can still be found today. These portions are highly tilted and backed by fault zones.
There were at least two different periods of rifting and extension within the basin. The first as a
result of the Grenville collision and the second when the supercontinent of Rodinia broke apart.
These periods of extension created normal faults (Timmons, Karlstrom, Dehler, Heizler, &
Geissman, 2001). The remaining pockets of strata escaped erosion because they are located on
the down blocks of these faults, which dropped as much as 5000 feet in some places. In most of
the canyon, the Tapeats Sandstone sits directly on top of the Schist, leaving a gap of geologic
history spanning approximately 1200 million years. This gap in history is known as the Great
Unconformity (Foos, 1999).
Grand canyon 5
Paleozoic
Beginning in the Cambrian,
approximately 570 Ma. the strata began to take
on their more familiar horizontal bedding
structure. The Paleozoic Era on the Colorado
Plateau is defined by transgressional marine
deposition on a passive continental margin. The
different facies of rock formations formed by a
series of transgressions and regressions of sea
level. The Tapeats Sandstone, Bright Angel
Shale, Muav Limestone, and Undivided Dolomite are all examples of marine depositional
environments at different depths. There is a definitive pattern of transgression and deposition and
subsequent regression and erosion displayed throughout the Paleozoic layers of the Colorado
Plateau. Disconformities throughout the rock record display these erosional periods of sea level
regression (Foos, 1999).
The rise in sea levels in the Cambrian may have attributed to the explosion of new life on
Earth. The shallow marine environments created more temperate climates along with the
increased nutrient content of the continental shelf is thought to have been a major contributor to
the increase in species diversity and trophic stability (Brasier, 1982).
Deposition continued uninterrupted in the Cambrian until a period of glaciation began,
approximately 507 Ma. Polar ice caused sea level to drop and a period of erosion began. The
Ordovician, Silurian, and a great deal of the Devonian period is completely missing from the
Figure 3. Early Cambrian 525 Ma. http://cpgeosystems.com/images/SWNA_525Ma-sm.jpg
Grand canyon 6
geologic during this period either caused by erosional forces or due to lack of deposition
(Waggoner, 1994).
Sea levels began to rise again at the beginning of Mississippian, resulting in the Redwall
Limestone formation and the Surprise Canyon formations. At the end of the Mississippian, sea
levels dropped again. Marked by another disconformity.
During the Pennsylvanian sea levels transgressed and the Supai Group was deposited,
before regressing again at the beginning of the Permian. Sea levels rose again during the
Permian, where the last of the Paleozoic strata were deposited.
Causes for the fluctuation in sea level can be caused by many different things or a
combination of events. Buoying of the sea floor at the site of a divergent plate boundary can
cause sea levels to rise. Tectonic activity within the plates as they shift and move creates heat
that will raise the continent, thereby lowering sea levels. At the continents age and cool they will
subside into the mantle allowing sea levels will rise onto the continent. Glaciation will also cause
global sea level regression.
From the Cambrian, there have been 14 periods where
erosion has dominated, creating unconformities in the rock
Figure 3 Mississippian 340 Ma Figure 4. Pennsylvanian 310 Ma. Figure 5. Permian 280 Mahttp://cpgeosystems.com/swnamtectonic.html
Grand canyon 7
record. Either by lack of deposition during the period or because erosion has scoured away any
trace of existence. Transgressive sequences are marked in light gray of Figure 6. These are
periods where sea levels have risen onto the continents. As sea levels rise there will be a series of
facies that can be found. Starting with a beach setting, sandstones will form. As water levels
continue and sea levels deepen, mudstones and shales will form. And finally, limestones will
form in the offshore reef environment. Regressions will have the opposite effect; limestones,
shales, mudstones, sandstones. The facies of the Grand Canyon Strata document these changes in
sea level.
The Laramide Orogeny is responsible for the uplift of the Colorado Plateau as it is today.
The Farallon Plate subducted beneath the North American continent at a very shallow angle, for
reasons that are still being debated. Compressional forces caused the ancient normal faults to
reactivate and reverse. Bringing the former down blocks of the fault as much as three thousand
feet upwards in some places (Timmons, Karlstrom, Dehler, Heizler, & Geissman, 2001).
The same forces that created the strata of the Colorado Plateau are still shaping it today.
Though not as fast moving as they once were, tectonics is still at work on the canyon, just as it
has been for millions of years.
References
Blakey, R. (2012 , February ). Paleogeographic and Tectonic History of Southwestern North
America:. Retrieved from Colorado Plateau Geosystems:
http://cpgeosystems.com/swnamtectonic.html
Grand canyon 8
Brasier, M. (1982). Sea level changes, facies changes and the late Precambrian-early Cambrian
evolutionary explosion. Retrieved from Academia:
http://www.academia.edu/437826/Sea_level_changes_facies_changes_and_the_late_Prec
ambrian-early_Cambrian_evolutionary_explosion
Foos, A. (1999). Geology of Grand Canyon National Park, North Rim. Retrieved from
http://www2.nature.nps.gov/geology/education/foos/grand.pdf
Ranney, W. (2013). Academia. Retrieved from Geology of Grand Canyon National Park:
Sedimentation and erosion on planet Earth's greatest landform :
https://www.academia.edu/8937766/Geology_of_Grand_Canyon_National_Park_Sedime
ntation_and_Erosion_on_Planet_Earths_Greatest_Landform
Rice, R. (2015). Tectonic Origin of The Colorado Mineral Belt. Retrieved from
http://academic.emporia.edu/aberjame/student/rice1/CMB.htm
Timmons, J., Karlstrom, K., Dehler, C., Heizler, M., & Geissman, J. (2001, February).
Proterozoic multistage (ca. 1.1 and 0.8 Ga) extension recorded in the Grand Canyon
Supergroup and establishment of northwest- and north-trending tectonic grains in the
southwestern United States. Retrieved from Research Gate: gsabulletin.gsapubs.org
Waggoner, B. (1994, 11 22). Cambrian: Tectonics and Paleoclimate. Retrieved from
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/cambrian/aucambrian.html