grantwriting for health councils ron hale, coordinator new mexico alliance of health councils ...
TRANSCRIPT
Grantwriting forHealth Councils
Ron Hale, Coordinator
New Mexico Alliance of Health Councils
www.nmhealthcouncils.org
(This presentation completed with support from the New Mexico Department of Health)
I. Introduction & General Tips
Basic Rules of grantwriting:
1. Demonstrate that your interests are the same as those of the funder
2. Follow the instructions
3. Make it easy for the reviewer
4. Only apply if it’s appropriate
General recommendations
• Follow the guidelines exactly
• Answer every question or section
• Include everything that is requested, nothing more
• Use logical format
• No B.S.
• Make it easy for the reviewers
Deciding to apply
• Is it appropriate?• Is the program feasible?• Is there time to do a good proposal?• Is this the appropriate organization?• What is the likely competition?• What are the chances of success?• Are all the appropriate stakeholders at the
table?
When is a grant appropriate?
• Non-profit, 5019(c)(3) organization
• Alignment with organizational mission & plans
• Applying is feasible• Success is likely• The organization is capable of
administering the grant
When is a grant not appropriate?
• When it’s the sole source of funding
• When it could divert the organization from it’s mission
• When it won’t cover the real program costs
• Political activities, lobbying
• Religious purposes
When is a grant more difficult?
• Government-run programs: schools, libraries, etc.
• Faith-based organizations
• Advocacy programs
II. Health Councils & Grant Funding
Health Councils & Grant Funding: Options
• Applying for direct funding
• Facilitating community processes: coalitions, collaborative projects
• Endorsing funding proposals
• Using of Health Profile information
• Providing assistance with research, writing proposals
Funds leveraged by MCH Councils
• During a three year period, County MCH Councils received approximately $8.5 million from the NMDOH. With this core funding, they were able to leverage an additional $37.8 million.
• County MCH Councils attracted over $4 for every $1 provided by DOH in core funding.
--Ann Hayes Egan & Ron Hale, March 2003
Leveraged Funding by Source, All Sources
28%
34%
34%
4%
State
Fed
Fdn
Other
MCH Funds leveraged, 2000-2003• State: $10,313,517• Federal: $12,877,334• Foundation: $12,602,915• Other: $1,627,220• Total: $37,420,986
Grants to health councils: Advantages
• Collaborative
• Can leverage funding
• Community-wide impact
• Stable
Grants to health councils:Disadvantages
• Jeopardizes perceived neutrality
• Competition with community organizations
• Fiscal agent
• Role as facilitator of community processes
III. Funding Sources
Charitable giving in the U.S.:
• Individuals: 75%
• Foundations: 12%
• Corporations: 5%
• Bequests 8%
Types of Grants:
• Programs & projects
• Contracts to implement specific programs
• General operating funds
• Capital grants
• Research grants
• Grants to individuals
The Closer-to-Home Rule:
1. Personal contacts
2. Local foundations or businesses
3. Regional funders
4. State-level funders
5. National funders
Types of Funding Sources:
• Private/family foundations• Community foundations• Health foundations• Corporations, businesses• United Way• Local government• State agencies• Federal grant programs
New Mexico: Family Foundations
• McCune Foundation, www.mccune.org
• Frost Foundation, www.frostfound.or
• Maddox Foundation, www.jfmaddox.org
• Daniels Fund, www.danielsfund.org
• Mabee Foundation, www.mabeefoundation.com
• Messengers of the Healing Winds Foundation (no website)
New Mexico: Community Foundations
• New Mexico Community Foundation
• Albuquerque Community Foundation
• Santa Fe Community Foundation
• Taos Community Foundation
• El Paso Community Foundation
• Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico
New Mexico: Health Foundations
• Con Alma Health Foundation
• Northern NM Health Grant Group
• Paso del Norte Health Foundation
• Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation (primarily education)
New Mexico: United Ways
• Central NM, Albuquerque
• Eastern NM, Clovis
• Northern NM, Los Alamos
• Southwest NM, Las Cruces
• Others in Alamogordo, Artesia, Carlsbad, Farmington, Hobbs, Roswell, Santa Fe, Tucumcari
New Mexico: National Foundations
• W.K. Kellogg Foundation
• Kresge Foundation
• Burnett Foundation
• Brown Foundation
• Ford Foundation
• Intel Foundation
• Robert Wood Johnson
Federal Funding Sources
• Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA)
• Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
• Administration on Children & Families (ACF)
• Others: Dept. of Education, Dept. of Labor, Dept. of Agriculture
IV. Prospect Research
Information Sources:
• Personal contacts
• Community history
• Foundation Center Collections
• Internet data bases
• Foundation websites
• Federal Government: Grants.gov
• State agency websites
Search Criteria:
• Accept unsolicited proposals?
• Geographic areas covered
• Areas of interest
• Funding history
• Deadlines
• Limitations/prohibitions
Foundation Center Materials:
ELECTRONIC RESOURCES • The Foundation Directory Online• Foundation Grants to Individuals
Online
PRINT RESOURCES • Board Member's Book (2003) • The Foundation Center's Guide to
Proposal Writing (2007) • The Grantseeker's Guide to Winning
Proposals (2008) • The Foundation Directory (2008) • The Foundation Directo5ry
Supplement (2008) • Foundation Fundamentals (2008) • Foundation Grants to Individuals
(2008)
• Foundations Today Series – Foundation Giving Trends (2008) – Foundation Growth and Giving
Estimates (2008) – Foundation Yearbook (2008)
• Guia para Escribir Propuestas (2008) • Guide to Funding for International and
Foreign Programs (2008) • International Grantmaking IV (2008) • National Directory of Corporate Giving
(2008) • Philanthropy Annual (2008) • Securing Your Organization's Future
(2001) • Social Justice Grantmaking II (2008)
Useful Resources:• Foundation Center: foundationcenter.org/findfunders/ • Foundations on Line: www.foundations.org• NM Grantmakers: http://nmgrantmakers.org/• NM Assn. of Grantmakers: http://www.nmag.org/grantseek.php• Center for Nonprofit Excellence:
http://www.centerfornonprofitexcellence.org/home/• Grantsmanship Center: http://www.tgci.com/funding.shtml• Guidestar: http://www.guidestar.org/• NM Funding Directory (UNM):
http://research.unm.edu/publications/nmfd_book• Chronicle of Philanthropy: http://philanthropy.com/grants/• Rural Information Center, National Agricultural Library:
http://www.nal.usda.gov/ric/ricpubs/fundguide.html
V. Creating a Successful Grant Proposal
Group Planning
• Convene the stakeholders
• Develop the program
• Sketch out a rough budget
• Assign tasks
• Do an application work plan & timeline
Proposal Timeline & Work PlanTasks/
Activities
Primary
Responsibility
Completion
Dates
Partners Involved
Planning & research
Writing :
First Draft
Writing:
Final Draft
Gathering support letters
Budget development
Forms
Packaging & mailing
Writing Style
• Use clear, concise language
• Avoid jargon
• Don’t assume the reviewers know you, your program, or New Mexico
• Write the way you talk
• Support assertions with data and/or anecdotal evidence
Basic Elements of a Proposal:
• Introduction/Abstract• Needs• Goals• Objectives• Outcomes• Activities/Work Plan• Evaluation Plan/Logic Model• Organizational Capability• Budget• Appendices/attachments
Introduction/Abstract
• Hook the reader
• Clear idea of the proposal in first paragraph
• Demonstrate that the proposal addresses the funder’s interests
Community Needs
• Community Description• Urgent needs: health, social,
economic, cultural, artistic• Data: National, state, local• Organizational experience• Community strengths,
resources
Goals
• Broad statements of intent
• Measurable or verifiable
• Overall outcomes of the project or mission of the organization
• Example: The goal of this program is to reduce child abuse & neglect in Sierra Co. by 10%.
Objectives
• Strategies: sets of activities, processes• Specific, measurable, verifiable• Concrete accomplishments• Time-framed• Example: By June 2008, the X
program will enhance parenting skills by providing parenting education classes to 150 teen parents.
Outcomes
• Program outcomes: Changes in behavior, knowledge, or conditions of target population
• System outcomes: Community-level changes in organizational relationships, policies, funding patterns, networks, coalitions, community infrastructure
• Health status changes: improvements in population health indicators
Examples of Outcomes:
• Population outcome: Program participants will demonstrate improved parenting skills, as measured by the Parenting Stress Index
• System outcome: The schools will develop policies that support teen parents in completing high school.
• Health status outcome: The rate of substantiated child abuse and neglect cases in X County will be reduced by 5% by 2012.
Time Frames for Outcomes:
• Short-term: Up to one year• Intermediate: 1 – 5 years• Long-term: 5 years or more
Activities/Action Steps
• Organized by objectives
• Tasks to be accomplished
• Who will be responsible
• Partners involved
• Completion dates
Outputs
Quantifying activities:• Products developed
• Services provided
• Numbers of people served
• Events produced (e.g., classes, town meetings, health screenings)
Project Work PlanTasks/
Activities
Completion Dates
Primary Responsibility
Resources needed
Collaborating entities
Objective #1
Objective #2
Objective #3
Objective #4
Objective #5
Project TimelineTasks/
Activities
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Objective #1
Objective #2
Objective #3
Objective #4
Objective #5
Project Logic ModelObjectives Activities Outputs Outcomes Indicators/
Measures
Objective 1
Objective 2
Objective 3
Objective 4
Objective 5
Budget: Expenses
Expenses:• Personnel: Salaries,
Benefits• Space rental• Supplies• Telephone• Internet • Postage• Equipment• Supplies• Travel• Administrative Overhead
Income:• Grants• Program revenue• Private contributions• Organizational resources
In-kind:• Space• Utilities• Administrative
supervision• Administrative support
Budget: Income
Income:• Grants• Program revenue• Private contributions• Organizational resources• Matching funds
In-kind:• Space• Utilities• Administrative supervision• Administrative support
Project Sustainability
Support following termination of the grant:• Program-generated revenues: fees for
services, tuition, sales of products• Third-party reimbursements: Medicaid,
Medicare, private insurance, etc.• Leveraging of additional grant funding (seed
funding)• Spin-off of program activities
Appendices/Attachments:
• Required forms
• Budget detail
• IRS determination letter
• By-laws
• Letters of commitment
• Letters of endorsement
• MOU’s