great books shared inquiry results
DESCRIPTION
Great Books Shared Inquiry increased student achievement on standardized texts in the Washington, D.C., Public Schools and at CS 134 in the Bronx, New York.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Case Studies: Measuring Results of JGB Program
• Washington DC Public Schools (1)
• PS 134 George F Bristow School, Bronx, NY(2)
Notes: (1) Research Project: “The Junior Great Books Program: Differential Effects on Student Achievement Across Ability Levels” draft document October 2003 (2) Measurement of effects of the implementation of the JGB 2003-204
![Page 2: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
SAT9 Writing Skill Categories(incorporated in DCPS project)
• Ideas and development*
• Organization, unity, and coherence*
• Word choice*
• Sentences and paragraphs
• Grammar and usage
• Writing mechanics
![Page 3: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Research Program’s School Profiles
Source: DCPS 2003 School database
00298084ControlG
(3,4 & 5)
67032735ControlG
(3,4 & 5)
291194388ResearchH
(3,4 & 5)
59
69
36
45
77
99
Free
Lunch(%)
000991ControlF
(3,4 & 5)
009865ControlE
(3,4 & 5)
1202860ResearchD
(5)
1301842ResearchC
(3 & 4)
4169188ResearchB
(3,4 & 5)
0018820ResearchA
(3,4 & 5)
White
(%)
Native
(%)
Hispanic
(%)
Black
(%)
Asian
(%)TypeSchool
(grades Tested)
![Page 4: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Research Group’s Positive Change Over Control Group Research Group’s Positive Change Over Control Group Highlights ImprovementHighlights Improvement (First to last writing sample)
Source: Individual student scores from referenced DCPS research project
![Page 5: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Source: Individual student scores from referenced DCPS research project
Average Score % Improvement (Average of Six SAT9 Categories): Impact More Pronounced in Earlier Grades
![Page 6: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Does skill enhancement derived through the JGB program translate into
improved performance on standardized tests (i.e., SAT9)?
![Page 7: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Source: Individual student SAT 9 scores from referenced DCPS research project.
Lower Performing Students Reap Significant Gains In SAT 9 Improvement as a Result of the JGB Program
![Page 8: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Source: DCPS SAT 9 scores 2003 & 2004 for students in research and control groups
SAT9 Reading—% Students Improving (Same SAT9 Reading—% Students Improving (Same Child 2003–2004)Child 2003–2004)
51%51%46%46%18%18%ControlControl
49%49%54%54%82%82%ResearchResearch
55thth44thth33rdrdGroupGroup
GradeGrade
Note: District wide, about 40% of the students improve year to year
![Page 9: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Source: DCPS SAT 9 scores 2003 & 2004 for students in research and control groups
SAT9 Mathematics—% Students Improving SAT9 Mathematics—% Students Improving (Same Child 2003–2004)(Same Child 2003–2004)
Note: District wide, about 40% of the students improve year to year
52%52%43%43%18%18%ControlControl
47%47%56%56%82%82%ResearchResearch
55thth44thth33rdrdGroupGroup
GradeGrade
![Page 10: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
NCE NCE (from SAT9) Research and Control Groups Start Out the Same Research and Control Groups Start Out the Same (2003) followed by Major Improvement by Research Group (2004). Same Child followed by Major Improvement by Research Group (2004). Same Child
2003–2004 2003–2004 (from schools(from schools with over 50% eligible for free lunch) with over 50% eligible for free lunch)
2004200420032003
4848
3737
4444
6363
MathMath
4141
3535
3232
5656
ReadRead
ControlControl
5050
4444
4141
6666
MathMath
4141
3838
3232
5252
ReadRead
ResearchResearch
545450505757525255thth
5656464664645555AverageAverage
53534242545451514th4th
60604747818163633rd3rd
MathMathReadReadMathMathReadRead
ControlControlResearchResearch
![Page 11: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
New York Department of Education
PS 134 George F. Bristow School
![Page 12: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
PS 134 George F. Bristow School
• Grades: PK–6• Students: 725• Ethnicity:
Black 47% Hispanic 52%
• Eligible for free lunch: 92%• Spending per student: $12,700• Location: New York City
Region 2 District 12
• Testing: English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics
• JGB introduced Fall 2002
![Page 13: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Student Levels of PerformanceStudent Levels of Performance
Level Description
1 Do not meet standards
2 Show partial achievement of the standards
3 Meet learning standards
4 Exceed the learning standards
Source: New York City Department of Education Bristow School 2002-2003 Report Card.
![Page 14: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
High Proportion of Students atHigh Proportion of Students at Level 1 (Not Meeting Standards) Level 1 (Not Meeting Standards)
(1999-2002 pre JGB)
Source: New York City Department of Education data files from web site.Calculations: Chaos Group, Inc.
![Page 15: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Fewer than 25% of Students at Levels 3 and 4 Meet or Fewer than 25% of Students at Levels 3 and 4 Meet or Exceed Standards Exceed Standards (1999-2002 pre JGB)
Source: New York City Department of Education data files from web site.Calculations: Chaos Group, Inc.
![Page 16: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
English Language ArtsEnglish Language ArtsMajor Improvement at Levels 1, 3, and 4 with JGBMajor Improvement at Levels 1, 3, and 4 with JGB
Source: New York City Department of Education data files from web site.Calculations: Chaos Group, Inc.
![Page 17: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Bristow’s ELA Improvement Ranks Among Top Four Bristow’s ELA Improvement Ranks Among Top Four Elementary Schools Between 2003–2004Elementary Schools Between 2003–2004
Bristow 2002-2003 improvement top .5% (4th)
Bristow 2001-2002: previously ranked 236th
![Page 18: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
MathematicsMathematicsMajor Improvement at Levels 1, 3, and 4 with JGBMajor Improvement at Levels 1, 3, and 4 with JGB
Source: New York City Department of Education data files from web site.Calculations: Chaos Group, Inc.
![Page 19: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Bristow’s Math Improvement Ranks Among Top Bristow’s Math Improvement Ranks Among Top Fifty Elementary Schools 2003–2004Fifty Elementary Schools 2003–2004
Bristow 2003-2004 Average Improvement top 8% (48th)
Bristow 1999-2001 Average Improvement (95th)
![Page 20: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Benefits—Students
1.Enhancing critical thinking skills
2.Scoring better on standardized tests
3.Integrating skills that carry over to other subjects
4.Structuring a foundation for further learning
5.Developing pride of accomplishment
![Page 21: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
1.Benefits—Teachers
1.Strengthening professional development
2.Identifying a basis for accountability
3.Building and enhancing teaching skills and strategies
4.Exciting students about learning
5.Improving standardized test scores
![Page 22: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Benefits—School/ District
1.Measuring results Student Teacher accountability
2.Achieving measurable results in months
3.Improving student performance across curriculum
4.Accomplishing success under economic constraints
![Page 23: Great Books Shared Inquiry Results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062303/555df224d8b42a3f618b4817/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
www.greatbooks.orgwww.greatbooks.org(800) 222-5870(800) 222-5870