green architecture and construction

Upload: phiphie92

Post on 07-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    1/17

    1

    Green Architecture and Construction

    Prof. Dr. Soontorn Boonyatikarn

    Center of Excellence Building and Environmental Technology,

    Department of Architecture, School of Architecture,Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

    [email protected]

    Abstract

    The world today has encountered with global warming and climate change which

    effect directly and indirectly in building design. The design of house with energy concern

    becomes part of solutions that can expand from the small unit to the national scale. One of the

    major design techniques of Bio-solar Home had been developed from Thai traditional wisdom

    in scientific approach that it seems the basic needs for habitation in hot-humid climate. Bio-

    solar Home can produce its own energy and supply left over energy to public. Since the

    successful of Bio-solar home was developed, the idea has distributed through Thailand. Many

    people were interested in and would like to apply the idea in the affordable cost housing.

    Therefore, the Eco-home was introduced to make it possible by managing cost, material,

    construction techniques, and labor and construction time. The Eco-home is the future

    generation that goes beyond Bio-solar home.

    The Eco-home answers all requirements such as, good performance energy reduction

    environmental preservation, affordable cost and truly sustainable living by integrated new

    innovation. The new innovations are new construction techniques, new design integration

    concept, new material that all combination success by working together between material

    researcher, architect, landscape, engineer, and construction.

    KeywordSustainable solution, green architecture, construction technique, design integration, new

    material

    Introduction

    A green architectural concept was continuing developed for a long time. It becomes

    general issue. Most concepts concerned about energy conservation and natural environment

    preservation. Some projects or concepts which only have a little success have claimed these

    were green architecture. After that, there are global warming problem and climate change

    problem. There are many green architectural concepts that try to link them with the global

    warming solution, although there is a slightly correlation between them. In general, they

    believe that energy conservation is a part of the solution because when we reduce energyconsumption CO2 emission will reduce too. Therefore some energy conservation building

    claimed that they can solve the global warming by reducing energy consumption that shown

    in the new paradigm shift in global warming solution (figure 1).

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    2/17

    2

    Architectural Best Practice

    Buildings Codes & Energy Awards

    Research and Development in Energy Integration

    The Paradigm Shift in Architecture

    Figure 1: New paradigm shift in global warming solution. (Buranakarn, 2009)

    Sustainable-architectural concept

    The Bio-solar home which developed since five years ago proofed that the truly

    sustainable can be done, and it also provided a high quality of living. This home is the one of

    successful sustainable solution. This home doesnt need water supply from the municipal

    supply. There is self water production, which comes from different source such as dew, water

    from the air condition system, and rainwater collection. It also uses recycle water. This home

    doesnt need electricity from grid, on the other hands there is self production electricity from

    solar. There is some surplus electricity sold back to the grid. And there is biogas production

    in this home from grass, waste water, and garbage.

    Although the Bio-solar home was successes, the construction cost is still a little bit

    higher than the typical house. And it also needs construction time similar to a typical house.

    The Bio-solar home may not the final solution for general people whose incomes lower than

    the average incomes.

    1

    5 6 7

    2 3 4

    8

    9 10

    Paradigm shift

    in Architecture

    (Sustainable Era)

    3 Periods

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    3/17

    3

    Figure 2: The Bio-solar home.

    Objectives

    The objectives of the Eco-home are to provide good performances with affordable

    cost for middle class income in reasonable construction time. As the next generation in the

    future, this home needs to develop new construction techniques and new design integration

    concepts that can reduce cost and time but able to provide good performances. The good

    performance in this paper is concern about low energy consumption and high quality of

    living. These emerge the usage of new materials that have proper properties to reduce energy

    consumption. These materials are also recycling material that is a part of environmental

    preservation. By understanding the usage of new construction technique, new design

    integration, and new material, Eco-home will developed varies building forms that still

    provide good performances.

    Beyond green architectural concept

    From Bio-solar home concept, it increases demand of true environmental house but

    the construction cost still very high. The global warming issue has also influenced on energyconsumption especially for the building and housing. The operation cost has played the major

    role. The question is how affordable house can be more efficient as good as Bio-solar home.

    Reducing construction cost is very important. Well understanding in each construction

    process is very significant. It has taken over 30 years of development and experiences for

    more than 3,000 houses around the world.

    The construction is developed by copying knowledge from past generation. These

    knowledge are collecting bit by bit and become their habitude which are unchangeable. It is

    difficult to correct their works defects without researches from architectural experts. This

    paper show breakthroughs that are new construction techniques and new design integration

    that provide good performance.

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    4/17

    4

    Temperature at the inside surface ceiling (April)

    77

    79

    81

    83

    85

    87

    89

    91

    93

    1:00

    2:00

    3:00

    4:00

    5:00

    6:00

    7:00

    8:00

    9:00

    10:00

    11:00

    12:00

    13:00

    14:00

    15:00

    16:00

    17:00

    18:00

    19:00

    20:00

    21:00

    22:00

    23:00

    0:00

    1:00

    2:00

    3:00

    4:00

    5:00

    6:00

    7:00

    8:00

    9:00

    10:00

    11:00

    12:00

    Temperature (o

    F)

    Typical house Eco-home

    Temperature (o

    C)

    33

    32

    31

    30

    29

    28

    27

    26

    25

    Temperature at the inside surface ceiling (April)

    Typical house

    Eco-home

    Temperature at the inside surface ceiling (April)

    77

    79

    81

    83

    85

    87

    89

    91

    93

    1:00

    2:00

    3:00

    4:00

    5:00

    6:00

    7:00

    8:00

    9:00

    10:00

    11:00

    12:00

    13:00

    14:00

    15:00

    16:00

    17:00

    18:00

    19:00

    20:00

    21:00

    22:00

    23:00

    0:00

    1:00

    2:00

    3:00

    4:00

    5:00

    6:00

    7:00

    8:00

    9:00

    10:00

    11:00

    12:00

    Temperature (o

    F)

    Typical house Eco-home

    Temperature (o

    C)

    33

    32

    31

    30

    29

    28

    27

    26

    25

    Temperature at the inside surface ceiling (April)

    Typical house

    Eco-home

    Figure 3: A comparison of temperature at the inside surface ceiling between the Eco-home

    and a typical house.

    The temperature at the inside surface ceiling in figure 3 show that temperature at peak

    in typical house is more times higher than in Eco-home. This causes high energy

    consumption cost for air condition system in typical house. While Eco-home use less energyconsumption and also easily build because its simple construction system. This turning point

    in the design integration is the first jump to the new concept beyond green architecture.

    By using new construction and design concept in Eco-home, there is an example of

    good performance shown in figure 4-5. The new construction techniques that show in this

    paper are an example for roof construction, foundation and ground floor construction. It

    shows a comparison of process, time, and labor of Eco-home to a typical house. By using

    these new techniques Eco-home can reduce air conditioning system.

    Figure 4: A comparison of roof construction process of Eco-home to typical house. (A) 6steps of construction (B) 2 steps of construction.

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    5/17

    5

    Table 1: A comparison of roof construction process of Eco-home to typical house.

    Typical house Eco-home

    Items Time (day) Items Time (day)

    1. column

    2. roof beam3. steel member structure

    4. purlins

    5. roof tile

    6. ceiling

    7

    84

    5

    5

    4

    1. wall panel

    2. roof panel

    2

    1

    Total time(day) 33 3

    Labor cost is due to time, man-day, and labor rate. Roof construction of Eco-home

    use 3 days, 10 man-days, and labor rate at 300 Baht per day per person. A roof construction

    labor cost of Eco-home is 9,000 Baht. Roof construction of typical house use 33 days, 12

    man-days, and labor rate at 250 Baht per day per person. A roof construction labor cost of

    typical house is 99,000 Baht.

    Figure 5: A comparison of foundation and ground floor construction process of Eco-home to

    typical house. (A) 5 steps of construction (B) 2 steps of construction.

    Table 2: A comparison of foundation and ground floor construction process of Eco-home to

    typical house.

    Typical house Eco-home

    Items Time (day) Items Time (day)

    1. pile

    2. footing

    3. ground column4. ground beam

    5. ground floor

    5

    6

    59

    5

    1. pile

    2. footing and ground floor

    2

    5

    Total time(day) 30 7

    Foundation and ground floor construction of Eco-home use 7 days, 10 man-days, and

    labor rate at 300 Baht per day per person. A roof construction labor cost of Eco-home is

    21,000 Baht. Foundation and ground floor construction of typical house use 30 days, 12 man-

    days, and labor rate at 250 Baht per day per person. A roof construction labor cost of typical

    house is 21,000 Baht.

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    6/17

    6

    Moreover, new construction techniques and design provide freedom of space usage.

    Eco-home can use 3 stories, while typical house can use only 2 stories at the same high of

    9.50m because a complicated construction in typical house makes waste space (figure 6).

    Moreover, the others advantage of the new construction technique can create 6 meters

    overhang to avoid the middle column at the parking space (figure 6 at B point). There is still

    a middle column at the parking space in a typical house (figure 6 at A point).

    Figure 6: A comparison of Eco-home space concept section to a typical house space concept

    section.

    Because of a simplicity of new construction technique, construction time of Eco-

    home spend only 56 days, while construction time of typical house are estimated about 256

    days.

    Air condition system in the house is necessary for controlling high quality of living.

    Eco-home use only 2 tons, which cost 50,000 Baht and consume electricity energy only 2,000

    Baht per month, while typical house use 10 tons, which cost 250,000 Baht and consume

    electricity energy 10,000 Baht per month.

    Figure 7: An exterior view of Eco-home.

    A BFL. 1

    FL. 2

    FL. 1

    FL. 2

    FL. 3

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    7/17

    7

    Energy reduction design concept

    Cooling load of the building basically calculated by the simple equation as follow:

    q = u * a* t (1)where:q = cooling load (in laboratory condition), Btu/h : heat transfer through

    single material

    u = U-value, coefficient of heat transmission : Material

    a = building surface area, ft2

    : Building form

    t = temperature difference, F : between outside and inside

    Then the said cooling load (q) can calculated to represent the average cooling load

    per square meter such as:

    Q = U * S/A* T (2)where:

    Q = cooling load, Btu/h : Building load

    U = average U-value of building envelop, Btu/hft2F : Building material

    S/A = surface to usable area ratio, ft2

    : Building form ratio

    S = building surface area, ft2

    A = usable area, ft2

    T = temperature difference, F : between the environment

    (surrounding) and in the

    building (condition space)

    From equation (1) and (2), we found out another factor which also influences the

    cooling load. As we know the most of energy consumption in building are from airconditioning system about 70%. The cooling load depends on U-value, surface area, and

    temperature different between inside and outside. The electrical energy usage depends on

    cooling load and energy efficiency ratio (COP). The new found equation:

    E = U * S/A* T * 1/COP (3)where:

    E = electrical supply (watts) : Electrical Supply for

    cooling load to maintain

    internal to comfort

    condition

    U = average U-value of building envelop : Building material

    (coefficient of heat transmission)

    S/A = surface to usable area ratio, m2

    : Building form ratio

    S = building surface area, m2

    A = usable area, m2

    T = temperature difference, C : between the environment

    (surrounding) and in the

    building (condition space)

    This paper shows an example of a comparison of cooling load through wall of Eco-

    home to typical house. Typical houses wall use 4 inch brick. Eco-homes wall use 8 inch

    Cebau or 6 inch wall panel. The U-value of these materials is shown as follows (figure 8).

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    8/17

    8

    Figure 8a: U-value of 4 inch brick wall.

    Figure 8b: U-value of 8 inch Cebau wall.

    Figure 8c: U-value of 6 inch wall panel.

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    9/17

    9

    Beside wall materials, there is another important material as glazing material. People

    need interaction with the environment scene outside, therefore glazing material is essential for

    client demand. Since glazing material has allows more heat into the house, the use of more

    glazing must be design with careful investigation. The designer didnt make the decision on

    the best performance. The use of more glazing material will result the use of more energy

    and may effect in lifestyle as shown in the table 3.

    Table 3: Glazing material properties.

    6mm Clear

    single glass

    Green laminated

    glass

    Green heat stop

    glass

    U-value(summer)

    (Btu/h ft2OF)

    1.06 1.06 0.30

    SC 0.86 0.60 0.45

    L/T 0.96 0.60 1.40

    STC 29 30 34

    Inside surface

    temperature (OC)

    26 45 32

    UV Transmittance 86 0.02 0.005

    Building form and surface area is explained by surface to usable ratio (S/A). Surface

    to usable ratio of typical house is 3, while Surface to usable ratio of eco-home is 2.

    Figure 9: A comparison Surface to usable ratio (S/A).

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    10/17

    10

    Site and Location are impact to temperature different between inside and outside

    (T). For example, an improper landscape such as concrete area exposed to the sun and not

    enough tree shade will increase temperature of 35OC to 39

    OC or higher. When the room

    temperature is 25OC the temperature different is14

    OC (Figure 10).

    Figure 10: An improper landscape in typical house.

    In contrast, Eco-home landscape is improved by growing trees for heat reduction.

    When the wind passes through 35OC, it will decrease the temperature around 3OC. When the

    room temperature is 25OC the temperature different is7

    OC (Figure 11).

    Figure 11: A proper landscape in Eco-home.

    The Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) or the Coefficient of Performance (COP) ofmechanical equipment is another factor. The higher COP of equipment partly air conditioner,

    can produce cooler temperatures with less energy consumption. In this paper is compare

    between Typical house, which 1/COP = 0.28 and Eco-home, which 1/COP = 0.23.

    This paper show example simulation of energy consumption in building that depends

    on wall component (figure 12).

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    11/17

    11

    Figure 12: Energy consumption ratio between typical house and Eco-home which use Cebau

    wall.

    In case of using Cebau wall, Eco-home can reduce energy around 30 times from

    typical house. It can easily improve home performance by change wall material from Cebau

    wall to panel wall. It can reduce energy around 60 times from typical house. Others coolingcomponent (figure 13 and 14).

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    12/17

    12

    Figure 13: The comparison of the cooling load of the Eco-home to a typical house.

    Figure 14: The comparison of cooling load of the Eco-home to a typical house.

    Typical House Eco-Home

    Typical House Eco-Home

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    13/17

    13

    Conclusion

    The Eco-home is one of the answers to the economic, climate change, and energy

    saving today. Its performance close to Bio-solar home with provide all human comfort all

    day and all year round with very low energy consumption. All openings protect UV ray from

    outside. Construction budget is less. For 200 square meters of usable area, Eco-home costs

    only 2 million baht while typical house costs 3 million baht. Construction time reduces to 56

    days compared to 256 days of typical house. It uses most recyclable materials such as EPS

    foam, steel, and glass. The energy consumption rate is very low which about 5 times less

    than typical one (figure 18). For wall materials and construction details, it reduces energy

    consumption as much as 30 times compared to typical wall section as light weight masonry,

    brick, etc. After small amount of energy budget required in Eco-home, then, renewable

    energy sources are feasible. Finally, the idea of carbon neutral is possible. It means that

    renewable energy can support all loads. Furthermore, it would provide energy to the grid or

    neighbor.

    Figure 15: Cumulative energy cost in 30 year.

    Cummulative ennegy consumption cost in 30 years

    -5,000

    0

    5,000

    10,000

    15,000

    20,000

    25,000

    30,000

    year-00 year-10 year-20 year-30

    (Baht/sq.m.)

    Bio-Solar Home Eco-home

    Typical house Millenium Home

    Cummulative ennegy consumption cost in 30 years

    -5,000

    0

    5,000

    10,000

    15,000

    20,000

    25,000

    30,000

    year-00 year-10 year-20 year-30

    (Baht/sq.m.)

    Bio-Solar Home Eco-home

    Typical house Millenium Home

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    14/17

    14

    Since it consumes low energy, it can use renewable energy such as solar power. Eco-

    homes roof area is enough for solar cell area requirement. Typical house requires more 19

    houses roof area. This concept is trended to be Carbon neutral.

    Figure 16: A comparison roof area requirement for solar cell of Eco-home to typical house.

    Discussion

    This sustainable design concept can apply to the conventional (or typical) one-storey

    house. Compare to the typical one-storey house with old design concept, this new Eco-home

    concept will give less complicated problems and get more good performances in many ways.

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    15/17

    15

    Figure 17:Diamond home at DNA resort and spa Khao Yai.

    The form and space of both Diamond-home and Igloo-home are developed from the

    new sustainable Eco-home concept.

    Figure 17: Igloo home at DNA resort and spa Khao Yai.

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    16/17

    16

    Becoming the Bio-sphere by reduce the foot print area of the Igloo-home. The result

    of doing that will minimized the building to surface area ratio (S/A).

    Figure 19: Bio-sphere at DNA resort and spa Khao Yai. (copyright by GG Advantage., Co.Ltd.)

  • 8/4/2019 Green Architecture and Construction

    17/17

    17

    Acknowledgement

    I am heartily thankful to my researcher teams, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Vorasun Buranakarn,

    Jayanin Chitranukroh, Ph.D., Suteewan Lohasuwan, Ph.D., Miss Usanee Mingvimol, and Mr.

    Anusitt Sirirachtaphat of center of excellence building and environmental technology, school

    of architecture, Chulalongkorn University. It is a pleasure to blessings those who made this

    research possible.

    Reference

    American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineering. (2001). 2001

    ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook IP Edition. Atlanta Geogia: (n.p.).

    Boonyatikarn, S. (2004). Bio-solar home: It is powered by the sun. Bangkok:

    Chulalongkorn University Press.

    Boonyatikarn, S. (1999). Energy Conservation House Technique for Better Quality Life.

    Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

    Buranakarn, V. (2009). A New Paradigm Shift Design for Global Warming Solution. World

    Alternative Energy Sciences Expo (WAESE), March 5-8th, 2009, Thailand.Buranakarn, V. (2008). The Paradigm Shift for the Next Generation. PAM Sarawak Chapter

    Design Forum: Green Building The Way to Sustainable World, Malaysia.