greenhouse geoengineering

17
ReflectivePlanet November 2009 1 / 17 South Spain success story REFLECTIVE PLANET (Climatic Geo-engineering Solutions S.L.) Greenhouse Geo-engineering:

Upload: anna-genis

Post on 29-Mar-2016

230 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Greenhouse geoengineering

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 1 / 17

South Spain success story

REFLECTIVE PLANET(Climatic Geo-engineering Solutions S.L.)

Greenhouse Geo-engineering:

Page 2: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 2 / 17

Climate facts

It is likely that global warming will exceed 2°C this century, up to6ºC in worst scenarios…

… unless global greenhouse gas emissions are cut by at least …

… 50% of 1990 levels by 2050, and by more thereafter.

PLAN B MIGHT BE UNAVOIDABLE:

CLIMATE GEO-ENGINEERING

Page 3: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 3 / 17

MAKING THE EARTH MORE REFLECTIVE

They address the root cause of climate change by

removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere

CDR - Carbon dioxide removal techniques

Techniques attempt to offset the effects of

increased GHGs concentrations by reducing the net solar radiation absorbed by the Earth

SRM - Solar radiation management

Climate Geo-engineering: 2 main strategies

Page 4: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 4 / 17

15%

Albedo

30%

Planetary albedo

198

+2,3

W/m2

Net Incoming Radiation

235 Wm2

EARTH’S GLOBAL ENERGY BUDGET and THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT

Climate Geo-engineering: overview

SRM CDR

Page 5: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 5 / 17

Climate Geo-engineering: overview

Current geoengineering proposals

Page 6: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 6 / 17

GREENHOUSE GEO-ENGINEERING = SRM + CDR

Almería pilot-scale trial: empiric observations of a unique

30yr geoengineering experiment in the widest

greehouses land cover in the world

Main 2 advantages over other SRM:

All other SRM do nothing to capture CO2:

Greenhouses Geo-engineering: feasible strategy

Page 7: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 7 / 17

Small scale intervention: local and regional climate effects

Suitable for extra protection of highly vulnerable farmland

Technology is fully formed: feasible and ready to be put into operation

Minor uncertainties regarding its effectiveness, costs, and environmental impacts

(compared to other SRM)

Ecological and sustainability issues well know: OPTIMIZATION of the South Spain

model

Quickly deployed over existing farmland: no land use conflict

Fairly quick and easy deployment (1 yr) and rapidly effective: short term targeted

cooling on sensitive human settlements (few years)

Easy and profitable implementation, maintenance through agricultural income: ZERO

EXTRA COST PER YEAR AND UNIT OF CO2 OFFSET

Other advantages: easier acceptability determined by social, legal and political issues as well as by scientific and technical factors.

Greenhouses Geo-engineering: feasible strategy

Page 8: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 8 / 17

South Spain miracle: the success of a model

Greenhouses Geo-engineering: profitable strategy

Prior to 70s: the poorest province in Spain

30,000 has of newly irrigated crops in semi-desert land

3 millions tons of horticultural products

>2 € billion worth of crops for EU markets

30,000 local farmers

30 million wages attract inmigrants

from 200 nationalities

Development of innovative

auxiliary agroindustry

Page 9: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 9 / 17

Carbon capture by biomass growth: 10TCO2/ha yr

Potential for Biomass Energy Plants

Important contribution to mitigating global climate change

Farmland maintained: no conflict with land use, food

production or local income

No reduction of crop yield compared to conventional

mitigation

Advantages over CDR:

Greenhouses Geo-engineering

Page 10: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 10 / 17

“Surface air temperature cooling trend and negative radiative forcing due to land use change towards greenhouse farming in southeastern Spain”

Campra et al.UNIVERSITY OF ALMERIA (SPAIN)

Journal of Geophysical Research, 113. 2008

Peer reviewed by the AGU (American

Geophysical Union)

NASA Terra Satellite

Greenhouses Geo-engineering – tested efficacy

Page 11: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 11 / 17

INM Control stations in SE Spain

MALAGA (MA)

GRANADA (GR)

MURCIA (MU)

ALMERIA (AL)

Agroclimatic stations in Campo de Dalias

Almeria

LAS PALMERILLAS (PAL)

MOJONERA (MOJ)

PAL

MOJ200 Km

5 Km

Greenhouses Geo-engineering – proved effects

Page 12: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 12 / 17

Surface Temperature series

Average in control stations (SE Spain): +0.5 ºC/ decade warming trend

Average in GH stations: -0.3 ºC/ decade cooling trend

BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

Greenhouses Geo-engineering – proved effects

Page 13: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 13 / 17

Annual evolution of albedo Terra Satelite MODIS data

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

30/1

2

09/0

119/0

1

29/0

1

08/0

218/0

2

28/0

2

10/0

320/0

3

30/0

3

09/0

419/0

4

29/0

4

09/0

519/0

5

29/0

5

08/0

618/0

6

28/0

6

08/0

718/0

7

28/0

7

07/0

817/0

8

27/0

8

06/0

916/0

9

26/0

9

06/1

0

16/1

026/1

0

05/1

1

15/1

125/1

1

05/1

2

15/1

225/1

2

04/0

1

day

Alb

ed

o

Greenhouse (GH)

Pasture (P)

diffeence GH-P

+10 % difference in reflectivity

Greenhouses Geo-engineering – proved effects

Page 14: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 14 / 17

SURFACE ENERGY BUDGET

Mean annual incoming and reflected solar UV-visible radiation (in watts/ hectare)

GREENHOUSE SURFACE WITHOUT GH SURFACE

580.000 380.0001,9 millions 1,9 millions

NET REDUCTION IN -200,000 Watts/ ha yr OF SOLAR INCOMING ENERGY IN GREENHOUSES AREA

Greenhouses Geo-engineering – proved effects

Page 15: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 15 / 17

Greenhouses Geo-engineering: Summary

A feasible, cost effective technology for delaying warming

impact in human settlements: urban and farmland

Supported by 30 years of the unique experimental

evidence of greenhouse farming in southeastern Spain

Effective cooling at local or regional scales

Carbon dioxide removal by biomass growth

With limited, affordable and well known impacts on the

environment

Page 16: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 16 / 17

Global surface albedo Geo-engineering could delay expected climate change damage for 60 years,

KEY ISSUE:

Long enough for:

CO2 emissions abatement through mitigation measures

local adaptative countermeasures to be developed

Post-Kyoto agreements to allow for THERMAL CREDITS based on CO2 offset equivalence of surface albedo

enhancement can then be proposed along with financing mechanisms

Main goal: save time to achieve carbon removal

Page 17: Greenhouse geoengineering

ReflectivePlanetNovember 2009 17 / 17

Greenhouses Geo-engineering media impact