ground systems for hf verticals some experimental comparisons to nec. rudy severns n6lf...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Ground Systems for
HF Verticals
some experimental comparisons to NEC.
Rudy Severns N6LFantennasbyn6lf.com
![Page 2: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Some typical questions on verticals
• How much of ground system is it worth putting down?
• What will I “gain” (in dB!) by adding more radials?
• Does it matter if I lay the radials on the ground surface?
• Are a few long radials useful?• Are four elevated radials really as good
as lots of buried radials? • How well do “gullwing” elevated radials
work?
![Page 3: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• We can use modeling or calculations to answer these questions but most people don’t have a lot confidence in mathematical exercises.
• High quality field measurements on real antennas are more likely to be believed.
• Over the past year I have done a series of experiments on HF verticals with different ground systems.
• That is the subject of today’s talk.
![Page 4: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Comment
• Today’s talk is a snapshot of experimental work.
• The talk will only cover the highlights.
• A detailed summary of the test range and instrumentation along with reports on each experiment can be found on my web page: antennasbyn6lf.com .
• A copy of this PowerPoint presentation will also be on the web site.
• You may also see other interesting information on the web page.
![Page 5: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• What’s the purpose of the ground system?
– It’s there to reduce the power absorbed by the soil close to the antenna (within a ¼-wave or so).
– The ground system increases your signal by reducing the power dissipated in the soil and maximizing the radiated power.
–Any practical ground system will not affect the radiation angle or far-field pattern!
![Page 6: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Power transmission
21Rr
RgRX
power
RgRr
RrPiS21antenna equivalent
circuit
antenna 1
antenna 2
![Page 7: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Measurement schemes
• The classical technique is to excite the test antenna with a known power and measure the resulting signal strength at some point in the far field (>2.5 wavelengths for 1/4-wave vertical).
• This approach takes great care and good equipment to make accurate measurements.
![Page 8: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• The modern alternative is to use a vector network analyzer (VNA) in the transmission mode.
• This approach is capable of reliable measurements to <0.1 dB.
• The VNA will also give you the input impedance of the antenna at the feed-point.
S21
rx antennatest antenna
![Page 9: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Some experimental results
![Page 10: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• The first experiment was a 160 m, ¼-wave wire vertical with two ground stakes and 4 to 64 radials.
• Measurements were made with a spectrum analyzer as the receiver.
![Page 11: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Test Results
-30.5
-30
-29.5
-29
-28.5
-28
-27.5
-27
4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64
number of radials
Mea
sure
d a
mp
litu
de
(d
Bm
)
160 m test verticalAugust 2006
run 2
delta gain = 2.4 dB
![Page 12: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
A new antenna test range on 40 m
![Page 13: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Antenna under test
![Page 14: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Test antenna with sliding height base
![Page 15: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Adding radials to the base
![Page 16: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Elevated radials
![Page 17: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Elevated radials close-up
![Page 18: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Loop receiving antenna
![Page 19: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Receiving antenna at 40’
N7MQ holdingup the mast!
![Page 20: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Network analyzers
HP3577A with S-boxHomebrew N2PK
note, automatic, organic, heating system
![Page 21: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Inside the N2PK VNA
![Page 22: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Test antennas
• A 1/4-wave 40m tubing vertical.
• An 1/8-wave 40m tubing vertical with top loading.
• An 1/8-wave 40m tubing vertical resonated with a base inductor.
• A 40 m Hamstick mobile whip.
• 40m SteppIR vertical
![Page 23: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
1/8-wave, top-loaded, 40 m vertical
![Page 24: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
What about a few elevated radials versus a large number
of surface radials?
![Page 25: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
NEC modeling prediction
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
height above ground [m]
pea
k g
ain
[d
B]
resonant radials
non-resonant radials
40m gp 4rad A and C
22 April 08
![Page 26: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
NEC predictions
• There will be a very rapid change in peak gain as we raise the base of the antenna and the radials above ground.
• Lifting the radials only a few inches makes a substantial difference.
• When the base of the antenna and the radials have been elevated several feet, the peak signal will be very close to that for a large number of buried radials.
![Page 27: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Experiment 3
• I began with sixty four 33’ wire radials lying on the ground surface.
• The length of the vertical was adjusted to be resonant at 7.2 MHz.
• I removed the radials in the sequence 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, measuring S21 as I went.
• With only 4 radials left I then raised the radials and the base of the antenna above ground incrementally measuring S21 at each height.
• There were no ground stakes and the feedline was isolated with a choke.
![Page 28: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
4-64 radials lying on ground surface
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
radial number
Gai
n i
mp
rove
men
t [d
B]
17 April 08, h=33.5', radial length = 33'
no ground stakes,choke isolated
5.8 dB
![Page 29: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
4 radials raised above ground
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
height of radials above ground [ft]
Gai
n i
mp
rove
men
t [d
B]
17 April 08, h=33.5', radial length = 33'
no ground stakes,choke isolated
5.9 dB
![Page 30: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
• NEC modeling predicts that four elevated radials will perform as well as 64 radials lying on the ground.
• In this example, measurements show no significant difference in signal strength between 64 radials lying on the ground and 4 radials at 4’!
![Page 31: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Some more elevated radial experiments
![Page 32: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Gullwing radials a la N6BV
![Page 33: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Variations in elevated radials
configuration
number|S21|
[dB]
Zi
[Ohms]
configuration
h=33.5’
1 0 39+j6.3 base & 4 radials
elevated 48”
2 -0.47 36+j6.2 base at ground level
radial ends at 48”
3 -0.65 29-j11 gullwing, base at ground level
ends at 48”
4 -0.36 39+j0.9 base & radials at 48”
four 17.5’ radials, 2.2 uH L
![Page 34: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
comment on four elevated radials
• From these experiments and NEC predictions it would seem that four elevated radials are all you need.
• That’s deceiving! Antennas with only a few elevated radials suffer from a number of problems:– hi-Q, radials tune the vertical– asymmetric currents in the radials leading to
pattern asymmetry. – tuning and current symmetry are very sensitive
to ground and mechanical variations as well as nearby conductors.
![Page 35: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
More on elevated radials
• Use more than 4 elevated radials :
– the Q and radial current asymmetries decrease.
– tuning is less sensitive
– the reactive part of the feed-point impedance changes more slowly as you add radials so you have a better SWR bandwidth.
– however, the ground loss does not improve much.
![Page 36: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Some experiments with radials lying on the ground surface
![Page 37: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Measured improvement over a single ground stake
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Number of radials
Sig
nal
imp
rove
men
t (d
B)
7.5' mobile whip
1/8-wave base loaded
1/8-wave top-loaded
1/4-wave
12 Sept 07
1/4-wavecalculated
f=7.2 MHz
![Page 38: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Caution!• Your mileage may vary!
• My soil is pretty good but for poorer soils expect more improvement with more radials.
• The degree of improvement will also depend on the frequency:
– soil characteristics change with frequency,
– at a given distance in wavelengths the field intensity increases with frequency.
![Page 39: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Measured base impedances
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Number of radials
Rs
(Oh
ms)
7.5' mobile whip
1/8-wave base loaded
1/8-wave top-loaded
1/4-wave
12 Sept 07
![Page 40: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Antenna resonance versus radial number
6.85
6.9
6.95
7
7.05
7.1
7.15
7.2
7.25
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Number of radials
Res
on
an
t fr
eq
ue
nc
y (M
Hz)
15 June 07
![Page 41: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Radial current for different heights
![Page 42: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
A current sensor
![Page 43: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Radial current measurements
![Page 44: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Measured current distribution on a radial
0.000
0.200
0.400
0.600
0.800
1.000
1.200
1.400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance from base (feet)
Rel
ativ
e cu
rre
nt
am
plit
ud
e
Sinewave trendline
1/4-wave vertical7.2 MHz4 radials
23 Sept 07
![Page 45: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Radial current distribution
Radial number Relative radial current normalized to 1 A total
1 0.239
2 0.239
3 0.252
4 0.269
![Page 46: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
NEC modeling prediction
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
height above ground [m]
pea
k g
ain
[d
B]
resonant radials
non-resonant radials
40m gp 4rad A and C
22 April 08
![Page 47: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
• Lets do an experiment:– isolate the base of the antenna with a
common mode choke (a balun).– lay out sixty four 33’ radials and adjust
the vertical height to resonance (reference height).
– remove all but four of the radials– Measure S21 with the reference height.– Measure S21 with the vertical shortened
to re-resonate. – Measure S21 with the reference height
as we shorten the radials.
![Page 48: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Effect of shorting radials, constant height
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
radial length [ft]
Gai
n in
crea
se f
rom
33'
rad
ials
[d
B]
4 radialsno ground
stake
4 radials1 ground
stake
experiment 46 May 08
radials lying on groundf= 7.2 MHz
8 radialsno ground
stake
vertical height = 34'
constant
![Page 49: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Radial current distribution
0.000
0.200
0.400
0.600
0.800
1.000
1.200
1.400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance from base (feet)
Rel
ativ
e cu
rre
nt
am
plit
ud
e
Sinewave trendline
1/4-wave vertical7.2 MHz4 radials
23 Sept 07
![Page 50: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
The lesson here!
• When you have only a few radials lying on the ground you can have much higher losses than expected!
• These losses can be reduced by shortening the radial lengths, i.e. less copper = less loss.
![Page 51: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Practical example: Field day scenario
• You want a 40 m vertical for field day. • ¼-wave = 33’. So you start with about 33’ of
aluminum tubing for the radiator and four 33’ wire radials.
• You erect this, with the radials lying on the ground and it’s resonant well below the band!
• What to do?– Nothing, use a tuner and move on,– Shorten vertical until it’s resonant,– add more radials– or, shorten the radials until the antenna is
resonant.• Which is best?
![Page 52: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Direct measurement of several options
• Do nothing: G= 0 dB
• Shorten height: G=-0.8 dB
• Shorten radials: G=+3.5 dB
• Use 16 radials: G=+4 dB
• Use 64 radials: G=+5.9 dB
![Page 53: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Another experiment
33' radials 21' radials 33' radials
21' radials
number of
radials
feed-point impedance
[ohm]
feed-point impedance
[Ohm]
|S21| relative to 4, 33' radials
[dB]
|S21| relative to 4, 33' radials
[dB]
delta gain
change [dB]
4 89.8 52.5 0 3.08 +3.1 8 51.8 45.6 2.26 3.68 +1.42
16 40.5 42.8 3.76 3.95 +0.19 32 37.7 41.6 4.16 4.04 -0.12
![Page 54: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
An observation
• When you have only four radials the test results are always a bit squirrelly:– small variations in radial layout,– coupling to other conductors, – like the feed-line,– all effect the measurements making close
repeatability difficult between experiments.– The whole system is very sensitive!
• This nonsense goes away as the number of radials increases!
![Page 55: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Summary
• Sparse radial screens (less than 16 radials) can have a number of problems:– increased loss with longer radials– unequal current distributions between radials.– system resonance shifts.– A few long radials can be worse than shorter
ones.– screen resonances can alter the radiation
pattern as the radials begin to radiate substantially.
![Page 56: Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062511/5518a391550346881f8b49a2/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Summary continued
• Try to use at least 8 radials but 16 is better.• The more radials you use, the longer they can be.• A number of 1/8-wave radials will be better than
half that number of ¼-wave radials. At least until you have 32 or more radials.
• In elevated systems:– try to use at least 8 radials– you can use radials shorter than ¼-wave and
either re-resonate with a small L or make the vertical taller or add some top loading.
– the “gullwing” geometry can work.