group work 1.should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? why?

32
Group Work 1. Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Upload: joella-west

Post on 28-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Group Work

1. Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Page 2: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Announcements

• Get 3 scraps paper per person in addition to whiteboard and marker

• Standards retakes 23-30 today 11–mn

• Last Exam 3 today–6 PM tomorrow

• Final (makeups) Tuesday 10:15–12:15

Page 3: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Nuclear Implications and Applications

Chapter 34

Page 4: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Nuclear Power

Source: Jim Zimmerlin, http://www.zimfamilycockers.com/DiabloCanyon.html

Diablo Canyon Power Plant, California

Page 5: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Nuclear Power

• Nuclear fission reactions release heat (kinetic energy of products)

• Heat boils water, powers turbine to generate electricity

• No greenhouse gas production

Page 6: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Fission Chain Reaction

Source: Griffith

Page 7: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Criticality

• Reaction self-sustaining if each fission on average induces another

• Critical mass depends on geometry, moderation, reflection, many other factors

Page 8: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Poll Question

Which shape of fission fuel will be the most likely to reach criticality?

A. A sphere.

B. A plate.

C. A long, thin cylinder.

Page 9: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Fissile Nuclei

• Required for reactors and bombs

• Fission started by absorption of thermal neutrons

• Only fissile nuclei are U-233, U-235, and Pu-239

• U-235 is less than 1% of natural uranium (rest is U-238)

Page 10: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Plutonium Breeding

Source: Griffith

Page 11: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Breeder Reactors

• Transmute U-238 to Pu-239 or Th-232 to U-233

• Increase amount of usable fuel

Page 12: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Nuclear Waste

Source: Savannah River Site

Page 13: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Nuclear Fuel Cycle

• Fission chain reaction produces fission products and neutron capture products

• Certain fission products absorb neutrons

• Fuel becomes unusable after ~1% burnup

• Must be reprocessed or discarded

Page 14: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Poll Question

The amount of nuclear waste generated would be reduced if

A. spent fuel were reprocessed and reused.

B. all reactors were shut down.

C. reactors with higher “burn-up” were used.

D. any of these.

Page 15: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?
Page 16: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Spent Fuel Hazards

Source: Cohen, B. L. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1977, 49, 1–20.

Page 17: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Reprocessing

• Recover U, Pu from spent fuel

• Discard fission product waste

• Possibility of U, Pu diversion

Page 18: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Advanced Reactor Designs

• Passive cooling systems

• Melt-proof fuel pellets

• Higher-burnup design

• On-site fast reprocessing

• Fast neutron fission of non-fissile nuclei

• Accelerator-based systems

Page 19: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Group Work

2. What should be done with nuclear waste?

Page 20: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Stellar Fusion

NASA photograph, Skylab, 10 December 1973

Page 21: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Think Question

What sort of nucleus releases energy by fusion?

A. Nuclei lighter than iron.

B. Nuclei about as heavy as iron.

C. Nuclei heavier than iron.

Page 22: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Fusion in the Sun

Source: Seeds, Horizons: Exploring the Universe

Net reaction: 4 p+ 4He + 2 e+ + 2 + 2

Page 23: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Fusion in Hotter Stars

Source: Seeds, Horizons: Exploring the Universe

Net reaction: 4 p+ 4He + 2 e+ + 2 + 3

Page 24: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Fusion Life of Massive Stars

• Massive star’s hot core fuses atoms to ever-higher masses

• Greater nuclear charges require higher temperatures, pressures

• Less energy per nucleon from fusing massive nuclei

• Fusion energy exhausted at iron

Page 25: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Fusion Death by Supernova

• Iron core does not produce energy to resist gravitational collapse of star

• High temperature and pressure in shock wave creates more massive nuclei

• Some products scattered by explosion

All Fe, Cu, W, I, Ag, Au, Pb, U, etc. were released by supernovas!

Page 26: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Nuclear Weapons

Page 27: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Fission Weapons

Grable 15-kT yield artillery shell, Nevada Test Site, 25 May 1953.

U.S. Department of Energy photo.

Page 28: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Gun Device (“Little Boy”)

Source: Griffith

Page 29: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Implosion Device (“Fat Man”)

Source: Griffith

Page 30: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Fusion Weapons

Dakota 1.1 MT shot, Enewetak, 25 June 1956. U.S Department of Energy photo.

Page 31: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Fusion in Weapons

• Require high temperatures to bring nuclei together (thermonuclear)

• Heated by fission bomb “pit”

2H + 3H 4He + n

Page 32: Group Work 1.Should nuclear power capacity be increased or reduced? Why?

Thermonuclear Device