[email protected] +32 (0) 32 65 35 32 · university of antwerp, department of biology,...

1
- 6 Flemish field locations with known metal contamination background and physicochemical characteristics -> 3 x fresh, 3x brackish - Caged organisms will be exposed for 28d - Passive samplers will e installed for 24h at 3 time points - Bioaccumulation within the organisms after 28d will be compared to the metal concentrations measured by DGTs - These measurements will be performed in the field (sediment-water interface & water) as well as in the lab (sediment-water interface) Assessing the bioavailability of metals in natural sediments by DGT passive sampling and bioaccumulation Hanne Hetjens, Kristine de Schamphelaere, Marjolein Vervaert, Elvio Amato, Johnny Teuchies & Lieven Bervoets , University of Antwerp, Department of Biology, Systemic Physiological and Ecotoxicological Research, Groenenborgerlaan 171/U7, 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium [email protected] +32 (0) 32 65 35 32 Sediment related metals can be present in a range of different physicochemical forms, some of which may be unavailable, non-toxic and therefore not-harmful to organisms what means that the interplay between the chemical speciation and biological effects of metals can be very site specific and hard to predict total sediment concentrations poor predictors of the actual risk measure of bioavailability should be considered in risk assessment procedures Recently, passive samplers have been tested to estimate the bioavailable contaminant fraction as well as the contaminant flux over the sediment-water interface over time, what provides several advantages over established monitoring techniques (such as grab- or spot sampling) in combination with being less destructive than conventional methods for which animal or plant tissue is needed. “Diffusive Gradient in Thin film samplers” (DGTs) have been indicated to provide reliable predictions of metal bioavailability and toxic potential for single (benthic) invertebrate species under (semi-) controlled conditions. Research objectives: Evaluation of the use of DGT passive samplers as indicators for the bioavailability of metals for (benthic) macroinvertebrates as well as of the robustness of the results from laboratory studies under field conditions. Introduction Materials and Methods Pilot study Preliminary results pilot study ©Fenwick - A pilot study has been performed for one location in November/ December 2017 - 4 different species (2 fresh - & 2 brackish water species) were deployed in the field and in the laboratory for 28d and 2 rounds of passive sampling were performed Aim Evaluation of the choice of test organisms as well as the general set up and procedures a b c a: caged organisms & passive samplers in the water; b: sediment probes & organisms in the laboratory and c: processing the sediment probes after a 24h deployment Hediste diversicolor Scrobicularia plana Corbicula fluminea Anodonta cygnea - 100% mortality of H. diversicolor and S. plana -> brackish species will only be used for brackish locations - Concentrations of several metals measured by the passive samplers below the limit of quantification Bioaccumulation in C. fluminea higher than in A. cygnea under field and laboratory conditions Metal flux and bio- accumulation in the field tend to be (slightly) higher than in the lab Lower DGT metal concentrations in the 2cond measurement within the lab sediment -> depletion ? possible underestimation of the actual biological risk if measurements are only performed under laboratory conditions ? Sediment A. cygnea C. fluminea Al (µg/g) 0 6000 8000 10000 250 Cu 0 50 100 150 200 Sediment A. cygnea C. fluminea Zn 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Sediment A. cygnea C. fluminea Field Figure 1: Flux of Al, Cu and Zn in μg/h/m 2 after 24h in the field. Figure 2: Background concentrations of Al, Cu and Zn in the sediment & metal concentrations measured in A. cygnea and C. fluminea after a 28d field exposure. Cu 0 200 600 800 Sediment A.cygnea C. fluminea Zn 0 200 400 600 800 Sediment A.cygnea C. fluminea Al (µg/g) 0 8000 10000 100 Sediment A.cygnea C. fluminea Laboratory Figure 3: Flux of Al, Cu and Zn in μg/h/m 2 after 24h in the laboratory. Figure 4: Background concentrations of Al, Cu and Zn in the sediment & metal concentrations measured in A. cygnea and C. fluminea after a 28d lab exposure.

Upload: others

Post on 22-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hanne.Hetjens@uantwerpen.be +32 (0) 32 65 35 32 · University of Antwerp, Department of Biology, Systemic Physiological and Ecotoxicological Research, Groenenborgerlaan 171/U7, 2020

- 6 Flemish field locations with known metal contamination background and physicochemical characteristics

-> 3 x fresh, 3x brackish

- Caged organisms will be exposed for 28d

- Passive samplers will e installed for 24h at 3 time points

- Bioaccumulation within the organisms after 28d willbe compared to the metal concentrations measured by DGTs

- These measurements will be performed in the field(sediment-water interface & water) as well as in the lab (sediment-water interface)

Assessing the bioavailability of metals in natural sedimentsby DGT passive sampling and bioaccumulation

Hanne Hetjens, Kristine de Schamphelaere, Marjolein Vervaert, Elvio Amato, Johnny Teuchies & Lieven Bervoets,

University of Antwerp, Department of Biology, Systemic Physiological and Ecotoxicological Research, Groenenborgerlaan 171/U7, 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium

[email protected] +32 (0) 32 65 35 32

• Sediment related metals can be present in a range of different physicochemical forms, some of which may be unavailable, non-toxic andtherefore not-harmful to organisms what means that the interplay between the chemical speciation and biological effects of metalscan be very site specific and hard to predict total sediment concentrations poor predictors of the actual risk

measure of bioavailability should be considered in risk assessment procedures

• Recently, passive samplers have been tested to estimate the bioavailable contaminant fraction as well as the contaminant flux over thesediment-water interface over time, what provides several advantages over established monitoring techniques (such as grab- or spotsampling) in combination with being less destructive than conventional methods for which animal or plant tissue is needed.

• “Diffusive Gradient in Thin film samplers” (DGTs) have been indicated to provide reliable predictions of metal bioavailability and toxicpotential for single (benthic) invertebrate species under (semi-) controlled conditions.

Research objectives: Evaluation of the use of DGT passive samplers as indicators for the bioavailability of metals for (benthic)macroinvertebrates as well as of the robustness of the results from laboratory studies under field conditions.

Introduction

Materials and Methods Pilot study

Preliminary results pilot study

©Fe

nw

ick

- A pilot study has been performed for one location in November/ December 2017

- 4 different species (2 fresh - & 2 brackish water species)were deployed in the field and in the laboratory for 28d

and 2 rounds of passive sampling were performed

AimEvaluation of the choice of test organisms as well asthe general set up and procedures

a b

c

a: caged organisms & passive samplers in the water; b: sediment probes& organisms in the laboratory and c: processing the sediment probesafter a 24h deployment

Hediste diversicolor Scrobicularia plana Corbicula flumineaAnodonta cygnea

- 100% mortality of H. diversicolor and S. plana -> brackish species will only be used for brackish locations- Concentrations of several metals measured by the passive samplers below the limit of quantification

• Bioaccumulation in C. fluminea higher than in A. cygnea under field and laboratory conditions

• Metal flux and bio-accumulation in thefield tend to be (slightly)higher than in the lab

• Lower DGT metal concentrations in the 2cond measurement within the lab sediment-> depletion ?

possible underestimationof the actual biologicalrisk if measurements are only performed underlaboratory conditions ?

Sediment A. cygnea C. fluminea

Al

(µg/g)

0

6000

8000

10000

250

Cu

0

50

100

150

200

Sediment A. cygnea C. fluminea

Zn

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Sediment A. cygnea C. fluminea

Fie

ld

Figure 1: Flux of Al, Cu and Zn in µg/h/m2 after 24h in the field. Figure 2: Background concentrations of Al, Cu and Zn in the sediment & metal concentrations measured in A. cygnea and C. fluminea after a 28d field exposure.

Cu

0

200600

800

Sediment A.cygnea C. fluminea

Zn

0

200

400

600

800

Sediment A.cygnea C. fluminea

Al

(µg/g)

0

8000

10000

100

Sediment A.cygnea C. fluminea

Lab

ora

tory

Figure 3: Flux of Al, Cu and Zn in µg/h/m2 after 24h in the laboratory. Figure 4: Background concentrations of Al, Cu and Zn in the sediment & metal concentrations measured in A. cygnea and C. fluminea after a 28d lab exposure.