health 2020 and health system strengthening
TRANSCRIPT
Health 2020 and
health systems
strengthening
Dr Zsuzsanna JakabRegional Director
WHO Regional Office for Europe
Ljubljana, Slovenia, 30 October 2015
Contents
From the Ljubljana Charter to Health 2020
Health situation in Slovenia
Investing in health
Slovenia health system review
Refugee and migrant health
Preparedness and response (Ebola)
Content
Ljubljana charter
Driven by values
Targeted on health
Oriented towards primary care
Based on sound financing
Centred on people
Alma-Ata Declaration;
Ljubljana Conference on
Reforming Health Care
1978-96
Introduced core health system functions:
governance; services delivery; financing;
resource generation
2000
Tallinn Charter:
health systems
for health and wealth
2008 and 2013
Oslo conference:
Impact of crisis
2009 & 2013
2012
Health 2020 priority area:
strengthening people-centred
health systems and public health
From the Ljubljana Charter to Health 2020
Two important measures for
universal health care
Unmet
need
Financial protection
against the costs of ill health
Slovenia is a top performer in
universal health careUnmet need for a medical examination for financial or other reasons by
income group in the European Union, EU-SILC data for 2012
Financial protection is excellent: out-of-pocket
payment <15%Out-of=pocket payment as a share (%) of total expenditure on health
ranked from low to high by income (high, upper-middle, lower-middle, low)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Ne
therl
and
sM
onaco
Fra
nce
UK
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
Slo
ven
iaG
erm
any
San M
arin
oD
enm
ark
No
rwa
yC
roa
tia
Czech R
epu
blic
Irela
nd
Austr
iaS
wede
nA
ndo
rra
Icela
nd
Esto
nia
Fin
land
Belg
ium
Ita
lyS
pain
Pola
nd
Slo
vakia
Isra
el
Hu
nga
ryS
witzerl
and
Lithu
ania
Gre
ece
Port
ug
al
Ma
lta
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tion
La
tvia
Bulg
aria
Cypru
s
Turk
ey
Bela
rus
Ro
man
iaB
osnia
an
d H
erz
eg
ovin
aT
FY
RM
Mo
nte
ne
gro
Turk
men
ista
nS
erb
iaK
azakhsta
nA
lba
nia
Aze
rbaija
n
Kyrg
yzsta
nU
kra
ine
Uzbe
kis
tan
Re
pub
lic o
f M
old
ova
Arm
enia
Geo
rgia
Tajik
ista
n
Source: WHO Global Health Expenditure Database for 2011
Alarming zone
The share of public expenditure for health spending is
lower in Slovenia than in many comparable countries
IE
NL
HU
AT
HR
SK
EE
CZ
FIDE
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
1995 2000 2005 2010
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
% of all health expenditure
Total health expenditure (as % of GDP) is
lower in Slovenia than the EU15 average
IE
NL
HU
AT
HR
SK
EE
CZ
FI
DE
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1995 2000 2005 2010
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
% GDP
60
65
70
75
80
85
Life expectancy is increasing and the gap
between Slovenia and EU15 is closing!
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
DE
1980 1990 2000 2010
60
65
70
75
80
85
IENL
HU
AT
HR
SK
EE
FI
CZ
1980 1990 2000 2010
years years
males females
NL
FI
EE
HUATCZ
IEHR
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
Maximum value
Regional average
Minimum value
Inequality in life expectancy: declining, but gap persists
Maximum value
Regional average
Minimum value
Inequality in life expectancy is decreasing, but the gap
persists
East–west: gap in mortality
Mortality due to circulatorysystem diseases
Source: National Institute of Public Health
High impact of mother‘s level of education
on stillbirths and perinatal mortality
So
urc
e: N
atio
na
lIn
stitu
te o
fP
ub
licH
ea
lth
Premature mortality in Slovenia is
decreasing
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
1980 1990 2000 2010
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
IE
NL
HU
AT
HR
SK
EE
CZ
FIDE
age-standardized death rate - all causes, 0-64, per 100000
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
litres of pure alcohol are
drunk per person per year
of the population is
overweight or obese
of the population
uses tobacco
Alcohol consumption remains a problem.
IE
NL
HUATHR
SK
EECZ
FI
1980 1990 2000 2010
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19 EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
DE
Pure alcohol consumption, litres per capita, age 15+
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
čisto spodnji indelavski sloj
srednji sloj višji srednji inzgornji sloj
Del
ež (%
)
TRENUTNI KADILCI
2001
2004
2008
2012
Comprehensive legislation on tobacco
control is needed.Current smokers
Source: National Institute of Public Health
Lower social
class
Middle social
class
Higher/highest
social class
Noncommunicable diseases – by far the first cause of
mortality – are the key challenge in Slovenia
Source: WHO mortality database
With continued good
work in monitoring
communicable
diseases, work must
be strengthened in
all sectors working in
noncommunicable
diseases, especially
cancer, suicide and
injuries.
Acute respiratory infections, pneumonia and
influenza in children <5y
Traffic accidents
Suicide
Cervical cancer
Breast cancer
Lung cancer
Cerebrovascular disease
Heart disease
0 10 20 30 40
Standardized death rate per 100,000 population
EU13
EU15
European Region
Slovenia
Diseases that represent the highest burden
of premature mortality in Slovenia
Source: WHO Europe: Mortality indicator database.
Standardized premature
mortality (age 0–64 years)
due to selected diseases,
2010
The mortality rate from cancer is high,
and lung cancer is in the lead
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
1980 1990 2000 2010
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
IENL
HU
AT
HR
SKEE
CZ
FI
DE
130
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290age-standardized death rate – number of deaths per 100.000
Mortality from diseases of the circulatory system
has been effectively reduced in Slovenia
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
1980 1990 2000 2010
IE
NL
HU
ATHR
SK
EE
CZ
FIDE
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800age-standardized death rate – number of deaths per 100.000
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
Slovenia has some of the best results in
reducing infant deaths
IE
NLHU
AT
HR
SK
EE
CZFI
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
1980 1990 2000 2010
Infant deaths per 1000 live births
0
5
10
15
20
25
DE
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
The percentage of the population ≥ 65 years
in Slovenia is rising rapidly.
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
SK
IE
HU
AT
EE
FINL
CZ
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
DE
HR
1980 1990 2000 2010
% of population aged 65+ years
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
European countries are strengthening their health
policies
.all answers (n=31 and 36 for 2010 and 2013, respectively)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
No and not planned for the future
No, but planned for the future
Yes, another strategy
Yes, comprehensive health policy
National health policy is aligned with H2020All answers (n=31 and 36 for 2010 and 2013, respectively)
2013
2010
Yes, comprehensive health
policy
Yes, another strategy
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
No and not planned for the future
No, but planned for the future
Yes, another strategy
Yes, comprehensive health policy
National health policy is aligned with H2020All answers (n=31 and 36 for 2010 and 2013, respectively)
2013
2010
2013
2010
Health 2020: the right political choices for health
Increase
healthy life
expectancy
.
Enhance
well-
being
Reduce
inequity
Reduce
premature
mortality
Support
upstream
approaches to
governance
and
determinants
of health and
universal
health
coverage
Establish
national
targets in
health
policies, and
monitor
Slovenia’s health system – a collaborative
effort
Five technical assistance
work packages
Generating evidence to
support process in Slovenia
Collaboration between WHO, the European
Observatory and more than 50
Slovene experts
Generating evidence
Five work packages covering a range of health system areas:
1. New, fully updated “Health systems in transition” profile
for Slovenia
2. Health system expenditure
3. Health system funding
4. Purchasing and payment
5. Optimizing service delivery
Benefits of a health system review
• Focus on the performance of the health system
• Provide detailed evidence on key challenges
• Identify areas amenable to reform
• Ensure consistency with Slovenia’s health
system values: sustainability, efficiency, equity
and quality
Health financing policy objectives and
performance
Financial protection
• Does use of health services cause financial hardship?
Equity in financing
• Who bears the financial burden of health services?
Adequate funding levels
Stable revenue flows
Administrative efficiency
Health financing policy objectives and
performance
Enhancing health system efficiency
• More efficient use of health resources is a pillar of
successful health system reform.
• Purchasing and payment functions must be well
designed and implemented.
• Health system review provides evidence on:
- the benefits of a health technology assessment
- strategic purchasing of goods and services
- equitable payment systems for health providers
Some indicators already show excellent
efficiency
IE
NL
HU
AT
HR
SK
EE
CZ
FI
DE
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
Average length of stay in hospital – number of days
6
10
14
18
1980 1990 2000 2010
Admissions for inpatient care could be
reduced
IE
NL
HU
AT
HR
SKEE
CZFI
DE
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
In-patient care admissions per 100
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
1980 1990 2000 2010
Outpatient contacts
NL
HU
AT
HR
SK
EE
CZ
FI
DE
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
Outpatient contacts per person per year
WHO Europe: European Health for All database
1980 1990 2000 2010
Density of doctors
IE
NLHU
AT
HR
SK EE
CZ
FI
1980 1990 2000 2010
Source: European database on human and technical resources for health.
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
DE
Physicians per 100000
Density of nurses
IE
NL
HU
AT
HR
SKEE
CZ
FI
DE
1990 2000 2010
EU15
SI
EU13
WHO/Europe
Nurses (PP) per 100000
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
European database on human and technical resources for health.
Ensuring effective service delivery
The health system review explores opportunities to
optimize the delivery of health services, including:
- building on model family medical practices to meet the
needs of people with chronic and multiple conditions
- supporting coordination and decision-making between
levels of care
- moving care out of hospitals when appropriate
- strengthening information technology
- model practices = referenčne ambulante
Evidence-based policy-making
The health system review highlights Slovenia’s commitment to evidence-based policy-making.
A basis for further discussion and consensus-building on priorities for health system reform
Continued support from WHO
Refugee and migrant health, a challenge
for the WHO European Region
1 out of 12 residents is a migrant
77 million migrants are living in the WHO European Region, which
represent 8% of its population.
Ensuring adequate standards of care for
refugees and migrants is essential:
For population health.
For the protection and promotion of
human rights of refugees, migrants and
the resident population.
This is aligned with the fundamental
values of Health 2020, such as health
as a human right, solidarity and
protection of the vulnerable.
Almost 600,000 refugees and migrants have crossed the
Mediterranean in 2015 so far.
Increase of arrivals in Slovenia, with peaks of over
10,000 migrants entering on daily basis.
Demystifying refugee and migrant health
There is no systematic
association between
migration and the
importation of infectious
diseases.
The public health aspects of migration are influenced by policies and interventions run by stakeholders outside the health sector, which do not always take into account the health implications of
their actions.
Ministry
of Interior
Ministry
of Labour
Ministry of
Social
Affairs
Ministry of
Foreign
Affairs
Ministry of
EducationMinistry of
Health
Refugee and migrant health,
a multisectoral agenda
Adapting to diversity: towards migrant-
sensitive health systems
Refugees/migrants = heterogeneous group
need to respond to diverse health
needs:
Sexual reproductive health and
rights
Mother and child health
Diabetes
Cardiovascular diseases
Mental health
Emergency care and protection
Protection against vaccine-
preventable diseases
2015 Goal: achieve zero human-to-human Ebola transmission
• The outbreak is not over: sporadic cases still reported in Guinea:
3 new confirmed cases reported in the week of 18 October.
• Robust surveillance remains essential..
• Vaccination trial continuing in Guinea; positive outcome, may play
a key role in ending the outbreak.
2016 Goal: sustain a resilient zero by rapidly detecting & stopping
new emergences
Ebola situation as of 21 October 2015
A unified WHO programme for outbreaks and emergencies
Priority to core capacities of the International Health Regulations
A global health emergency workforce
Improved functioning, transparency, effectiveness and efficiency of International Health Regulations
Accelerated research and development in epidemics or health emergencies
WHO Contingency Fund for Emergencies
Reform of WHO’s Work in Outbreaks and Emergencies
with Health and Humanitarian Consequences
Overseen by WHO Director General, supported by:
– An Advisory Group on Reform of WHO’s Work in Outbreaks and
Emergencies with Health and Humanitarian consequences
• 19 high-level experts in large-scale emergency response, disaster preparedness, disease
outbreak control and crisis coordination. Chaired by UNSG SE on Ebola, David Nabarro. .
– A Project Team at WHO
Fed by other processes such as:
– An IHR Review Committee on the Role of the IHR(2005) in the Ebola
Outbreak and Response
• 16 experts from the IHR Roster of Experts. Chaired by Pr. Didier Houssin
Reform of WHO’s Work in Outbreaks and Emergencies
with Health and Humanitarian Consequences