heat transfer predictions for forced convective boiling

Upload: oas217

Post on 02-Apr-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Heat Transfer Predictions for Forced Convective Boiling

    1/7

    Heat Transfer Predictions for

    Forced Convective Boiling

    From Thermal-FluidsPediaJump to:navigation,search

    The different flow regimes have significant effects on the heat transfer

    characteristics of convective boiling in a tube. While heat transfer for

    subcooled liquid and superheated vapor can be easily handled by

    correlations for single-phase heat transfer, the intermediate heat transfer

    mechanism is complicated by phase change from liquid to vapor. After

    boiling is initiated in the tube, vapor bubbles are generated at certain

    nucleate sites while the rest of the inner surface of the tube remains in

    contact with the liquid. Under these conditions, the heat transfer mechanism

    is a combination of two parallel processes: single-phase convection in the

    liquid and nucleate boiling.

    The overall heat transfer coefficient for convective boiling in an upward

    vertical tube can be written as(Chen, 1963)

    where and hb are heat transfer coefficients for single-phase convection of

    the liquid and nucleate boiling, respectively. Fand S in eq. (1) are dynamic

    factors that modify the contributions of single-phase liquid convection andnucleate boiling, respectively

    The single-phase heat transfer coefficient for liquid alone can be obtained by

    using the Dittus-Boelter/McAdams equation:

    The contribution of nucleate boiling is determined by using the correlation

    proposed byForster and Zuber (1955)for pool boiling:

    The convective boiling factor Fcan be obtained by a regression of

    experimental data(Chen, 1963):

    https://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#column-onehttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#column-onehttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#column-onehttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#searchInputhttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#searchInputhttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#searchInputhttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#searchInputhttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#column-one
  • 7/27/2019 Heat Transfer Predictions for Forced Convective Boiling

    2/7

    whereXtt is the Lockhart-Martinelli parameter obtained by (seeHeat

    Transfer Predictions for Forced Convective Condensation)

    The nucleate boiling suppression factor S is

    where

    is the local two-phase Reynolds number.

    Based on more than 10,000 experimental data points for different fluids,

    including water, refrigerants, and cryogents,Kandlikar (1990, 1991)

    proposed the following generalized heat transfer correlation for convectiveboiling in both vertical and horizontal tubes:

    where hNBD and hCBD are the nucleate boiling dominant and convective boiling

    dominant heat transfer coefficients, and they are obtained by

    where Co is the convective number, Bo is the boiling number, and is the

    Froude number.

    https://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Condensationhttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Condensationhttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Condensationhttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Condensationhttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Condensationhttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Condensation
  • 7/27/2019 Heat Transfer Predictions for Forced Convective Boiling

    3/7

    The Froude number multiplier, , is

    For liquids with a Prandtl number between 0.5 and 2000, a range that covers

    most fluids except liquid metal, the single-phase all-liquid heat transfer

    coefficient in eqs. (8) and (9) is

    where the friction factor fin eq. (14) is given by

    Table 1: for copper tube

    Fluid Fluid

    Water 1.00 R-114 1.24

    R-11 1.30 R-134a 1.63

    R-12 1.50 R-152a 1.10

    R-13B1 1.31 Nitrogen 4.70

    R-22 2.20 Neon 3.50

    R-113 1.30

    The fluid-surface parameter depends on the combination of the liquid and

    tube material used. For stainless steel tubing, is taken as 1 regardless of

    the type of fluid. For copper tubing, can be obtained from Table 1

    Kandlikar (1990; 1991). The above correlation is valid for

    Under constant heat flux conditions, the wall temperature will sharply

    increase when the heat transfer mechanism inside the tube suddenly

    https://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#References
  • 7/27/2019 Heat Transfer Predictions for Forced Convective Boiling

    4/7

    changes from two-phase to single vapor phase heat transfer. Since the heat

    transfer inside the tube always begins with the single liquid phase, then

    changes to convective boiling, and finally to single phase vapor, the critical

    heat flux (CHF) phenomenon always occurs at a point near the exit of the

    tube.

    For this reason, CHF for convective boiling inside the tube is a local

    phenomenon. There are numerous empirical correlations available in the

    literature. The most generalized model to predict CHF for forced convective

    boiling is recommended byKatto and Ohno (1984).

    For

    For

    where

    https://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#References
  • 7/27/2019 Heat Transfer Predictions for Forced Convective Boiling

    5/7

  • 7/27/2019 Heat Transfer Predictions for Forced Convective Boiling

    6/7

    The critical heat flux predicted using eq. (16) agreed reasonably well with avariety of fluids, including water, ammonia, benzene, ethanol, helium,

    hydrogen, nitrogen, R-12, R-21, R-22, R-113, and potassium.

    Heat transfer coefficients for boiling in both vertical and horizontal tubes are

    often measured from experiments using electrical heating that result in

    axially and circumferentially uniform heat flux. While this approach can give

    reasonable boundary conditions for boiling in a vertical tube,Thome (2004)

    pointed out that electrical heating for boiling in a horizontal tube is not

    preferred, because circumferential conduction in the tube wall from the hot,

    dry-wall condition at the top to the colder, wet-wall condition at the bottom

    yields unknown boundary conditions. Therefore, countercurrent hot water

    heating that can provide reasonable boundary conditions is preferred.

    References

    Chen, I.C., 1963, A Correlation for Boiling Heat Transfer to Saturated Fluids

    in Convective Flow,ASME preprint 63-HT-34, Presented at 6th National

    Heat Transfer Conference, Boston, MA.

    Forster, H.K., and Zuber, N., 1955, Dynamics of Vapor Bubbles and Boiling

    Heat Transfer,AIChE Journal, Vol. 1, pp. 531-535.

    Kandlikar, S.G., 1990, A General Correlation for Two-Phase Flow Boiling

    Heat Transfer Coefficient Inside Horizontal and Vertical Tubes, ASME

    Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol. 112, pp. 219-228.

    Kandlikar, S.G., 1991, Development of a Flow Boiling Map for Subcooled

    and Saturated Flow Boiling of Different Fluids in Circular Tubes, ASME

    Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol. 113, pp. 190-200.

    Katto, Y., and Ohno, H., 1984, An Improved Version of the GeneralizedCorrelation of Critical Heat Flux for the Forced Convection Boiling in

    Uniformly Heated Vertical Tubes,International Journal of Heat and Mass

    Transfer, Vol. 27, pp. 1641-1648.

    Thome, J.R., 2004, Engineering Data Book III, Wolverine Tube, Inc.,

    Huntsville, AL.

    https://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#Referenceshttps://www.thermalfluidscentral.org/encyclopedia/index.php/Heat_Transfer_Predictions_for_Forced_Convective_Boiling#References
  • 7/27/2019 Heat Transfer Predictions for Forced Convective Boiling

    7/7