heavy ions collisions (results and questions)
DESCRIPTION
Heavy Ions Collisions (results and questions). Anatoly Litvinenko Elena Litvinenko. [email protected] [email protected]. 1. Outline. Ядерная материя при большой плотности энергии Новое фазовое состояние – легко верится. Workshop on Heavy Ions , New York, Nov. 29 - Dec 1, 1974. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
11
Heavy Ions CollisionsHeavy Ions Collisions(results and questions)(results and questions)
Anatoly LitvinenkoElena Litvinenko
[email protected]@nf.jinr.ru
22
Outline.Outline.
Ядерная материя при большой плотности энергии Новое фазовое состояние – легко верится
Workshop on Heavy Ions, New York, Nov. 29 - Dec 1, 1974.
The name ”Quark Gluon Plasma” was coined by Eduard Shuryak in 1978.
66
Lattice QCD
GeVTc 0.17=
Frithjof Karsch, arXiv:hep-lat/0106019v2 (2001)
F. Karsch, Lecture Notes in Physics 583 (2002) 209.
7
space-time structure of heavy ions collisions
kinetic freeze-out(no collisions)
Chemical freeze-out(no particles production)
Parton-parton interaction
Initial inelastic collisions
99
2 rings, 3.8 km circumference.2 rings, 3.8 km circumference.Polarized p and Nucleus up to Au.Polarized p and Nucleus up to Au.
Top energies (each beam):Top energies (each beam):100 GeV/nucleon Au-Au. 250 GeV polarized p-p.100 GeV/nucleon Au-Au. 250 GeV polarized p-p.
NIM, v.499, p. 235-880, (2003)
GeV200SNN
The PHENIX Detector Детектор PHENIX регистрирует различные частицы после столкновения:фотоны, электроны, мюоны и адроны (пионы и протоны).
The PHOBOS Detector
137000 Silicon Pad Channels
1m
12m Be Beampipe
Spectrometer
Octagon
Vertex
Ring Counters
Paddle Trigger Counter
Cerenkov Counter
DX magnet DX MagnetZDC ZDC
PHOBOS
1616
questions have to be answered
1.Can we achieve high energy density in nuclei-nuclei collisions ?
2.What is the barion density of prodused hadronic matter?
3.Is established thermodynamic equilibrium ?
Connected question
Can we make conclusion about from experiment?
1919
QUESTION I(a)QUESTION I(a)
How much energy lost the primary hadrons?What is barion density of prodused
hadronic matter?
Can we make some conclusion from experiment?
2222
QUESTION I(b)QUESTION I(b)
Can we have high energy densityin nuclei-nuclei collisions ?
Can we make some conclusion from experiment?
24
Dependence on centrality of charged hadron density
S.S. Adler et al. , Phys. Rev. C 71, 034908 (2005)
Dependence on pseudorapidity of charged hadron
Do not confuse it is the other distribution
B. Alver et al.Phys. Rev. C 83, 024913 (2011) PHOBOS Coll.
26
Dependence on pseudorapidity of charged hadron
The CMS collaboration, J.High Energy Phys 08, p.141 (2011)
27
Dependence on pseudorapidity of charged hadron
The CMS collaboration, J.High Energy Phys 08, p.141 (2011)
«LHC multiplicity is two times greater than at RHIC»
3232
Can we have high energy densityin nuclei-nuclei collisions ?
Can we make some conclusion from experiment?
Yes! For RHIC and LHC energy
QUESTION I(b)QUESTION I(b)
3333
QUESTION IIQUESTION II
Is equilibrium state of hot and dense hadronic matter achieved?
What is conclusions from experiment?
3434
QUESTION IIQUESTION II
Is equilibrium state of hot and dense hadronic matter achieved?
The possible observableParticle ratios Particle spectra Collective flows
… ?
3535
Particle ratio and sParticle ratio and statistical modelstatistical models
These models reproduce the ratios of particle yields with only two (or three ) parameters
One assumes that particles are produced by a thermalized system with temperature T and baryon chemical potential
The number of particles of mass m per unit volume is :
3636
Particle ratios and statistical model(s)
Peter Braun-Munzinger, Krzysztof Redlich, Johanna StachelarXiv:nucl-th/0304013v1, (2003)«Of particular interest is the extent to which the measured particle yields are showing equilibration.»
Estimation of equlibration time for RHIC and LHC (have to be studied)R. Baier, A.H. Mueller, D. Schiff, and D.T. Son, Phys. Lett. B 502 (2001)51; Nucl. Phys. A698 (2002) 217.
A. Tawfik ; arXiv:hep-ph/0508244v3 22 Mar 2006
Statistical methods have become an important tool to study the propertiesof the fireball created in high energy heavy ion collisions, where theysucceed admirably in reproducing measured yield ratios.1. Can this success be taken as evidence that the matter produced in these
collisions has reached thermal and chemical equilibrium?2. Can the temperature and chemical potential values extracted from such
statistical model fits be interpreted as the equilibrium properties of the collision matter?
STAR Coll., Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 102
3939
Particle ratios and sParticle ratios and statistical modelstatistical models
chemical freez-out
Nucl. Phys. A758, No.1-2, p.184, (2005)
4444
Particle (hadrons) Particle (hadrons) spectraspectra
R. Stock; «Quark Matter 99 Summary: Hadronic Signals»arXiv:hep-ph/9911408v1 19 Nov 1999
45
BorisTomasic, arXiv:nucl-th/0304079 v1 25 Apr 2003
blast-wave model
1. Pions, nucleons and also kaons decouple all quite suddenly from the whole transverse profile of the fireball. For all of them the freeze-out happens at the same proper time, measured in a frame that co-moves longitudinally with the fluid element of the expanding firebal
2. The radial density distribution at the freeze-out is uniform.3. Longitudinal expansion is boost-invariant. 4. In this study, the transverse expansion is parametrized through
rapidity, which depends linearly on the radial coordinate.
4747
Particle (hadrons) Particle (hadrons) spectraspectra
A Iordanova (for the STAR Collaboration);J. Phys. G35, p.044008, (2008
4949
Elliptic flowElliptic flow
For big value of elliptic flow you need save space anisotropy for a long enough timeThe value of elliptic flow is sensitive to the Equation of State (EoS)
Importance of elliptic flowImportance of elliptic flow
1.Give information about equilibration time2.Give information about EoS
On the next slides shown how ensemble of free streaming particles lost space eccentricity
Evidence for the short thermailzation time
Good description of elliptic flow by hydrodynamics with initiation conditionjust from geometry of collision
Constant ratio of elliptic lowto the space eccentricity
Fast decreasing of space anisotropy for the free streaming particle
QUESTION IIQUESTION II
Is equilibrium state of hot and dense hadronic matter achieved?
What is the conclusion about it from experiment?
The strong indication that YES.
Some designations
sQGP for strongly-interacting Quark-Gluon Plasma
Commonly accepted:QGP, pQGP,wQGP
for weakly-interacting Quark-Gluon Plasma
Observables and hadronic matter properties
59
KEKETT – CQN Scaling – CQN ScalingKEKETT – CQN Scaling – CQN Scaling
Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 162301 (2007)
Mesons
Baryons
Quark-Like Degrees of Freedom EvidentQuark-Like Degrees of Freedom Evident
Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook; Quark Matter 09, Knoxville, TN March 30 - April 4, 2009
60
K. Aamodt et al.(ALICE Collaboration), PRL 105, 252302 (2010)
elliptic flow – energy elliptic flow – energy dependancedependance
6161
JET Quenching
Modification of Jet property in AA collisions because partons propagating in colored matter lose energy.
One of the possible observableTp
Was predicted in a lot of works. Some of them (not all) are:
1
0)(Pd
J.D.Bjorken (1982), Fermilab – PUB – 82 – 059 - THY.M.Gyulassy and M.Palmer, Phys.Lett.,B243,432,1990.X.-N.Wang, M.Gyulassy and M.Palmer, Phys.Rev.,D51,3436,1995.R.Baier et al., Phys.Lett.,B243,432,1997.R.Baier et al., Nucl.Phys.,A661,205,1999
The suppression of the high- hadrons In AA collisions
Jet: A localized collection of
hadrons which come from a fragmenting parton
High pT (> ~2.0 GeV/c) hadrons in NN
h
h
h
abc
dParton distribution functions
Hard-scattering cross-section
Fragmentation Function
h
)Q,x(f 2aaa/A )Q,x(f 2
bbb/B cdabd )Q,z(D 2ddd/h
d,c,b,ahXABd
h
High pT (> ~2.0 GeV/c) hadrons in AA
A
B
h Hard-scattering cross-section
Fragmentation Function
Parton distribution functions
+Numbers of binary collisionsPartonic Energy
Loss
(...)f b/B(...)f a/A cdabd
)Q,z(D 2d
*dd/h
1
0 d
*d
z
z)(Pd
∑→dcba
hXABd,,,
=σ CollN
6464
Nuclear modification factor
is what we get divided by what we expect.is what we get divided by what we expect.
NN
collAAAA d
NdR
σ><σ
=/
From naive picture
AAR
Suppression of high-pt hadrons. Qualitatively.
6666
Nuclear modifications to hard scattering
Large Cronineffect at SPSand ISRSuppression at RHIC
Is the suppression due to the medium?(initial or final state effect?)
RAA (pT ) d2N AA /dpTdTAAd
2 NN /dpTd
6767
Au+Au @ sNN
= 200 GeV d+Au @ sNN
= 200 GeV
preliminary
Au+Au @ sNN
= 200 GeV d+Au @ sNN
= 200 GeV
preliminary
Au+Au @ sNN
= 200 GeV d+Au @ sNN
= 200 GeV
preliminary
Au+Au @ sNN
= 200 GeV d+Au @ sNN
= 200 GeV
preliminary
• Nice picture! Isn’t it?
Again Au+Au and d+Au
6868
The matter is so opaque that even The matter is so opaque that even
a 20 GeV a 20 GeV 00 is stopped is stopped..
• Suppression is very strong (RAA=0.2!) and flat up to 20 GeV/c• Common suppression for 0 and it is at partonic level• > 15 GeV/fm3; dNg/dy > 1100
7171
The matter is so dense that even heavy quarks are stopped
Even heavy quark (charm) suffers substantial energy loss in the matter
The data provides a strong constraint on the energy loss models.
The data suggest large c-quark-medium cross section; evidence for strongly coupled QGP?(3) q_hat = 14 GeV2/fm
(2) q_hat = 4 GeV2/fm
(1) q_hat = 0 GeV2/fm
(4) dNg / dy = 1000
7272
If there are any other observables for Jet Quenching?
Correlation of trigger particles 4<pT<6.5 GeV withassociated particles 2<pT<pT,trig
Associated particles
Near side jetTrigger particle
Away side jet
Yes! Back to Back Jets correlation.
7373
In-plane In-plane
Out-of-plane
Out-of-plane
Back to Back Jets correlation.Back to Back Jets correlation.Dependence from reaction plane.Dependence from reaction plane.
7474
Jet tomography
20-60%
STAR Preliminry
20-60%
Back-to-back suppression depends on the reaction plane orientation
In-plane
Out-plane
energy loss dependence energy loss dependence on the path length!on the path length!
7575
The matter is so dense that it The matter is so dense that it modifies the shape of jetsmodifies the shape of jets
• The shapes of jets are modified by the matter.– Mach cone?– Cerenkov?
• Can the properties of the matter be measured from the shape?– Sound velocity– Di-electric
constant• Di-jet tomography is
a powerful tool to probe the matter
7777
One more results from lattice QCD
heavy-quark screening mass
r/)rexp(~)r(
In EM plasma it is well known Debye screening
T/1~r/1 D
/J -- suppression
7878
The matter is so dense that it melts(?) J/ (and regenerates it ?)
CuCu
200 GeV/c
AuAu
200 GeV/c
dAu
200 GeV/c
AuAuee
200 GeV/c
CuCuee
200 GeV/c
J/’s are clearly suppressed beyond the cold nuclear matter effect
The preliminary data are consistent with the predicted suppression + re-generation at the energy density of RHIC collisions.
Can be tested by v2(J/)?
8181
SummarySummary
o RHIC has produced a strongly interacting,RHIC has produced a strongly interacting, partonic state of dense matterpartonic state of dense matter
/ 15 3fmGeVBj
8282
SummarySummary
o The matter is so dense that even heavy quarks are stopped
(3) q_hat = 14 GeV2/fm
(2) q_hat = 4 GeV2/fm
(1) q_hat = 0 GeV2/fm
(4) dNg / dy = 1000
The matter is hot 8787
The matter may melt but regenerate J/’s
Put the results together
The matter is denseThe matter is strongly coupled
The matter modifies jets
> 15 GeV/fm3
dNg/dy > 1100
Tave = 300 - 400 MeV (?)PHENIX preliminary
January 6, 2002 RHIC/INT Winter Workshop 2002 89
Modeling the Source• Interaction region
Assembly of classical boson emitting sources in space-time region
• The source S(x,p) is the probability boson with p is emitted from xDetermines single-particle momentum spectrum
E d3N/dp3 = d4x S(x,p)
Determines the HBT two-particle correlation function C(K,q) C(K,q) ~ 1 + | d4x S(x,K) exp(iq·x) | 2/| d4x S(x,K) |2
where K = ½(p1 + p2) = (KT, KL), q = p1 – p2
The LCMS frame is used (KL = 0)
• In the hydrodynamics-based parameterizations: assume something about the source S(x,p)Gaussian particle density distribution
Linear flow (rapidity or velocity) profile
Instantaneous freeze-out at constant proper time (“sharp”)
CollN(...)/ aAf (...)/ bBf cdabd
1
0 d
*d
z
z)(Pd )Q,z(D 2
d*dd/h∑
dcba ,,,
(...)/ aAf (...)/ bBf cdabd ),(/2dddh QzD∑
dcba ,,,
9393
Why the collisons of heavy nuclei is interesting?
Let us see on the space – time picture of collision
pre-collision QGP (?) and parton production
hadron production
hadron reinteraction
QCD phase diagram
96
Dependence on pseudorapidity of charged hadron
S.S. Adler et al. , Phys. Rev. C 71, 034908 (2005)
9797
Theoretical explanation
Comparison to model calculations with and without parton energy loss:
Numerical values range from ~ 0.1 GeV / fm (Bjorken, elastic scattering of partons)~several GeV / fm (BDMPS, non-linear interactions of gluons)
Too many approaches.We need additional data!
2.0~Rand,p~d AuAu8
T
2.0~p/p
Estimation from data
9898
Initial state effects (test experiment d+Au)
Suppression in central Au+Au due to final-state effects
/h
100100
How about suppression for protons?
pcollccollCP )N/dN/()N/dN(R New
Close to nuclear mod. factor, because no suppression for peripheral coll.
103103
[w/ the real suppression]
( pQCD x Ncoll) / background Vogelsang/CTEQ6
[if there were no suppression]
( pQCD x Ncoll) / ( background x Ncoll)
Au+Au 200 GeV/A: 10% most central collisions
[]measured / []background = measured/background
Preliminary
pT (GeV/c)
Binary scaling. Is it work?
104104
Theoretical explanation
Comparison to model calculations with and without parton energy loss:
Numerical values range from ~ 0.1 GeV / fm (Bjorken, elastic scattering of partons)~several GeV / fm (BDMPS, non-linear interactions of gluons)
Too many approaches.We need additional data!
105105
If is there space for Color Glass Condensate or only Cronin Effect?
May be. Look at the BRAMS DATA
107107
Observables and space time structureObservables and space time structure of of Heavy ion collisionsHeavy ion collisions
108108
Observables and space time structureObservables and space time structure of of Heavy ion collisionsHeavy ion collisions
Production of hard particles: jets heavy quarks direct photonsCalculable with the tools of perturbative QCD
109109
Observables and space time structureObservables and space time structure of of Heavy ion collisionsHeavy ion collisions
Production of semi-hard particles: gluons, light quarks relatively small momentum: make up for most of the multilplicity
cGeVpT / 21
110110
Observables and space time structureObservables and space time structure of of Heavy ion collisionsHeavy ion collisions
Thermalizationexperiment suggest a fast thermalization (remember elliptic flow)but this is still not undestood from QCD
111111
Observables and space time structureObservables and space time structure of of Heavy ion collisionsHeavy ion collisions
Quark gluon plasma
112112
Observables and space time structureObservables and space time structure of of Heavy ion collisionsHeavy ion collisions
Hot hadron gas
113113
Particle ratio and sParticle ratio and statistical modelstatistical models
These models reproduce the ratios of particle yields with only two parameters
One assumes that particles are produced by a thermalized system with temperature T and baryon chemical potential
The number of particles of mass m per unit volume is :