heliops issue 102

154
D E L I V E R I N G G L O B A L C O V E R A G E O F T H E H E L I C O P T E R I N D U S T R Y 2 0 1 6 100 A N N IV E R S A R Y Y E A R ISSUES 2016 I ISSUE 102

Upload: heliops-magazine

Post on 05-Aug-2016

233 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Geisinger LifeFlight, Russian Industry Update, KA62 - The New Kid.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HeliOps Issue 102

DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

2 0 1 6 I I S S U E 1 0 2

Page 2: HeliOps Issue 102

THINKMEDICAL ASSISTANCE

Our helicopters are a fl ying life support system for paramedics and rescue services. Always on call to reach casualties of accidents and disasters or evacuate critical care patients.Prescribe an H135

Important to you. Essential to us.

10736-AH-EMS-H135-Master-EN.indd 1 05/05/2015 13:21

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

Page 3: HeliOps Issue 102

DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

CONTENTS2 0 1 6 I I S S U E 1 0 2

118

66

80

92

36

FEATURES

GEISINGER LIFE FLIGHT TODAY & TOMORROWGeisinger Life Flight has been in existence for 35 years, growing from a single-helicopter operation into a major patient transport and EMS provider, servicing 42 counties in Pennsylvania. Unlike many EMS or medevac providers, Life Flight is a regional non-profit organization and on a recent visit, HeliOps learned how they got where they are today.

PILOTLESS AIRCRAFTFriend or Foe to Civilian Helicopters?

The increasing use of unmanned aerial vehicles (aka drones) is among the hottest aviation trends today. Should the helicopter industry be worried?

NEW RUSSIAN IN THE GAMEThe Kamov Ka-62 is the latest Russian medium twin, designed from the outset to meet the needs of demanding civil and parapublic customers at home and abroad. Alexander Mladenov reports on this new Russian entrant to the helicopter industry.

RUSSIAN MARKET UPDATEThe Russian market of helicopters is on the verge of big changes, due to recovering domestic production and increasing interests by foreign investors in local production. Eugene Gerden provides an update into the Russian recovery.

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT – ADMISSIBILITY IN COURT, AND OUR AVIATION SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

‘JUST CULTURE’ IS JUST GOOD BUSINESSIn ‘getting it right’ with safety, one of the important aspects of any organization is its culture. An experienced EMS operator, Mike Biasatti delves into what a ‘just culture’ means and how it can be applied to the EMS fraternity.

AUTOMATION THREAT & ERROR MANAGEMENT IN HELICOPTER OPERATIONPART TWO

40

70

84

96

110

122

136

REGULARS COLUMNS

FROM THE PUBLISHER 6

INDUSTRY NEWS 9

THE AMERICAS 28

A GREATER VIEW 32

EMS VIEWPOINT 34

FLIGHT TRAINING 36

Page 4: HeliOps Issue 102

4 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

We Fly

We Maintain

TTTTThe Phe Phe Phe Phe Pooooowwwwwerful Diferful Diferful Diferful Diferful Difffffferererererenceenceenceenceence

www.colheli.com503-678-1222

Columbia Helicopters is the only commercial operator of the Model234 Chinook and Vertol 107-II, the civilian models of the CH-47Chinook and H-46 Sea Knight. The company’s aircraft operate globallyin extreme weather conditions, and are supported by one of the mostexceptional maintenance facilities anywhere in the industry.

Columbia’s fully functional maintenance facility is a one-stop shop,able to meet all depot level maintenance requirements for internal andexternal customers.

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

Page 5: HeliOps Issue 102

THE TEAM

KIA KAHA MEDIA GROUP

PO Box 37 978, Parnell, Auckland 1001, New Zealand

T +64 21 757 747

EMAIL [email protected]

NEWS DESK

[email protected]

www.heliopsforum.com

PUBLISHERNeville ‘Ned’ Dawson

EDITOR Mark Ogden

DEPUTY EDITOR Alan Norris

SUB EDITORLeigh Neil

THE AMERICAS EDITOR John Persinos

EUROPEAN EDITOR Alexander Mladenov

EAST COAST USABuzz Covington

CONTRIBUTING EDITORSGlen White

Sarah BowenNick Mayhew

Nick HendersonThomas Humann Chris Smallhorn

PROOFREADERBarbara McIntosh

www.heliopsmag.com

ISSN 1179-710X

We Fly

We Maintain

TTTTThe Phe Phe Phe Phe Pooooowwwwwerful Diferful Diferful Diferful Diferful Difffffferererererenceenceenceenceence

www.colheli.com503-678-1222

Columbia Helicopters is the only commercial operator of the Model234 Chinook and Vertol 107-II, the civilian models of the CH-47Chinook and H-46 Sea Knight. The company’s aircraft operate globallyin extreme weather conditions, and are supported by one of the mostexceptional maintenance facilities anywhere in the industry.

Columbia’s fully functional maintenance facility is a one-stop shop,able to meet all depot level maintenance requirements for internal andexternal customers.

Page 6: HeliOps Issue 102

6 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

Quite often the auto and aviation industries share technologies and concepts. One concept I have just experienced in the auto industry is one I hope does not translate directly to the aviation

industry and that is the concept of repair by replacement. Six months ago, an engine warning light came on and the car intermittently lost power. Over the ensuing months, following the fault three diagnosis published by the OEM which reflected the codes being issued by the computer, the ignition coils were changed twice. Okay, that didn’t work because soon after each change, the problem would reappear. Well, the next step in the diagnosis was ‘replace the fuel pump’.

Ah, fixed the issue – great! Except it took $4000 and 6 months to fix the problem. At no point did anyone actually ‘check the coil output’, or ‘check the fuel pump pressure’ because the fault three diagnosis did not call for it and was purely a repair by replacement and it would seem the so-called ‘mechanics’ did not have the background knowledge to actually diagnose a problem before figuring out which components to change. Who wears the cost? The customer of course.

I noticed some time ago in the military that the training system was veering away from teaching the tradesmen the very basics and the OEM fault three diagnosis was very much repair by replacement. I remember a problem being chased for quite some time with radios being replaced when in the end, an old salt thought he would check the earthing throughout the aircraft. Sure it took a couple of days but the problem was found and fixed. By then, about 3 sets of fully serviceable radios had been returned for repair. Regardless of the technology, it seems that nothing replaces basic skills and knowledge.

In the last issue, I noted that there was a potential market shake-up with the release of UH-60s to the civil market and Sikorsky’s reluctance to civil certify the aircraft. Well with the US Army drastically pulling back on UH-60 production, maybe it’s time for Sikorsky to look at civil certification of the Black Hawk to generate a new market for itself. I still think that the success Columbia and now other operators are having with the Chinook proves there

FROM THE EDITOR

Skills & Knowledge

Page 7: HeliOps Issue 102

is a significant market for capable ex-mil machines although the OEMs have been pretty slow to fully exploit the possibilities of that market.

On 29 April, the energy and aviation industry suffered the tragic loss of an Airbus H225 off the west coast of Norway. Eleven passengers and two crew on board the helicopter, were lost. Although the H225 and its predecessor AS332s have been significant players in the offshore market, nearly if not all the IOGP companies have, at the time of writing, grounded the H225 with some saying they have ‘permanently’ moved to other types. Airbus have said that it was allied with the decision taken to put all commercial EC225LP passenger flights on hold but after several accidents involving the 225 main transmission, Airbus is going to have be very proactive in encouraging the energy companies, their advisors and the unions of the inherent future safety of the type.

FROM THE EDITOR

Page 8: HeliOps Issue 102

Ratings:

• Type

• Instrument

• Type Rating Instructor

• Instrument Rating Instructor

Professional Pilot Development

T R A I N I N G

“expert tuition, very knowledgable. I would recommend Starspeed to anyone looking for pilot training”

+44 (0) 1285 611000 • [email protected] • WWW.STARSPEED.CO.UK

pilot development ad 3.indd 1 01/05/2015 14:32

Page 9: HeliOps Issue 102

9DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

FRENCH SÉCURITÉ CIVILE RETROFIT EC145s The French Defense Procurement Agency is to retrofit the avionics suite of their 35 EC145s operated by the Sécurité Civile over seven years by Airbus Helicopters at the Sécurité Civile base in Nîmes.

300 KG PAYLOAD INCREASE FOR ANSATKazan Helicopters has received approval to increase the take-off weight of the ANSAT from 3300 to 3600 kg.

ENSTROM FLY 2ND TH180 PROTOTYPEEnstrom has resumed flight testing of their TH180 with the second prototype following the recent crash of prototype number one. Flown by test pilot William Taylor the aircraft was taken through a standard production-type acceptance flight including hover and forward flight checks. The third TH180 flight test aircraft is in production with completion expected by mid-2016.

FINAL H130 DELIVERED TO MONACAIRMonacair has received the last H130 of a contract for six signed in September 2015 and will be operated on the regular shuttle service between Monaco Heliport and Nice International airport that started in 2016 following the delivery of their first H130.

INDUSTRY NEWS

Page 10: HeliOps Issue 102

10 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

SWEDISH NATIONAL POLICE RECEIVE BELL 429sThe Swedish National Police has taken delivery of seven 429s to be used for law enforcement and SAR, including mountain rescue, across Sweden and is the largest 429 fleet in operation in the European Union.

REACH AND CALSTAR TO MERGETwo air medical ambulance providers in Northern and Central California are entering into a merger agreement that will place CALSTAR within the same corporate holding company as REACH. Officials from both organizations foresee no base closures but see the goal being to focus on integration, support and maintaining the services.

RESCUE AND RECOVERY SERVICES FOR NIGERIABristow Helicopters has started a dedicated rescue and recovery service for Nigeria’s oil and gas industry and will deliver the new service from its base at Port Harcourt operating an AW139.

INDUSTRY NEWS

AW169 DELIVERED TO FALCON AVIATIONFalcon Aviation of Abu Dhabi has taken delivery of an AW169 light and is the first operator in UAE to use the new type and the first customer worldwide to use the aircraft for offshore oil and gas transportation.

Page 12: HeliOps Issue 102

12 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

NEW LONDON CABRI G2 TRAINING SCHOOLCotswold Helicopter Centre has entered into a training school joint venture with Gama Aviation to create a new base at Fairoaks Airport on the south-west of London. This will be the eleventh flight training school in the UK operating the Guimbal Cabri G2.

FIRST AW139 TO WESTPACLease Corporation International has delivered the first of four AW139s to Westpac Rescue

Helicopter Service based in Australia, following fit-out for EMS operations and crew training, the first aircraft will enter service in 2017.

NHV RECEIVES RUSSIAN MRO APPROVALBelgium company NHV and its Russian commercialization partner HELIATICA have obtained approval from the Russian Federal Aviation Agency for NHV’s maintenance facility in Ostend, allowing access the Russian market for maintenance and inspections of the H155.

INDUSTRY NEWS

Page 13: HeliOps Issue 102

13DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

H160 VIP VERSION UNVEILEDPegasus Design style intention has been selected to design the H160 VIP version and includes an exclusive cabin interior, electrical footstep and hinged doors all aimed the private and business aviation market.

INDUSTRY NEWS

Page 14: HeliOps Issue 102

14 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

D E L I V E R I N G G L O B A L C O V E R A G E O F T H E H E L I C O P T E R I N D U S T R Y

WHERE EVERYTHING IS HAPPENING!

Page 15: HeliOps Issue 102

15DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

H145 FOR WIKING HELIKOPTER SERVICE WIKING Helikopter Service GmbH signed a contract for two H145s in offshore configuration to be used for the transfer of harbor pilots to ships and service technicians to offshore wind farms as well as for air rescue missions over the North Sea, delivery of the first aircraft is scheduled for the end of 2016.

BELL 505 FOR AUSTRALIA Australia’s longest running continually owned helicopter company Professional Helicopter Services has ordered three Bell 505s and will be the first helicopter training school in Australia to operate the type.

INDUSTRY NEWS

Page 16: HeliOps Issue 102

16 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

H130 FOR INDIAN EMS U.S. air medical service provider Air Medical Group has ordered three H130s to launch the first HEMS operation in India joining forces with an Indian firm, Aviators Air Rescue.

VIP H160 FOR FALCON AVIATIONUAE based Falcon Aviation have signed a letter of intent for the first VIP version of the H160 and will be operated from Al Bateen Executive Airport.

GRANDNEW FOR JAPANKagoshima International Aviation has placed an order for a second AW109 GrandNew to perform HEMS missions in Kagoshima Prefecture as part of the Doctor Heli system program. The aircraft is expected to enter service by the end of 2016.

AW109 TREKKERS FOR TOKYO POLICEThe Tokyo Metropolitan Police has ordered two AW109 Trekkers which are scheduled for delivery in 2017, this will be the first Asian law enforcement operator of the type.

HNZ RENEW OFFSHORE CONTRACTHNZ New Zealand Limited has renewed a five year offshore oil and gas support contract with a consortium of customers and has commenced flying crew changes from New Plymouth to petroleum platforms in New Zealand using two AW139s.

INDUSTRY NEWS

Page 17: HeliOps Issue 102

17DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

heliSUPPORTN E W Z E A L A N D L I M I T E D

Helisupport New Zealand offers International sales for all helicopter types, specialising in Eurocopter products.

We can manage or support any part of a sale, purchase or logistical movement of complete helicopters or helicopter parts.

We carry out post or pre-sale specialised configurations of helicopters. Paint, Interior, Avionics, STC fitment, Weight reductions, Packing and Shipping can be done either in NZ or at other international locations.

We also perform major airframe inspections with capability for full refurbishment.

www.helisupportnz.com ph: 64 3 443 2903

AIRCRAFT SALESENGINE SALESMAINTENANCE PART SUPPORT

CUSTOM INTERIOR DESIGN & COMPLETION

Take a look at our website picture gallery to see some of the work scope we carry out or call any time to inquire more.

Custom Completions

Our Recent Successes

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

Page 18: HeliOps Issue 102

18 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

AZERBAIJAN STARTS S92 LONG-LINE OPERATIONSAzerbaijan based Silk Way Helicopter Services has started long line operations which includes flare tip change outs on offshore and onshore oil and gas platforms throughout the Caspian Sea area.

SULTAN OF JOHOR S-76B UPGRADEUniversal Avionics is providing advanced avionics for two Sikorsky S-76Bs operated by His Majesty the Sultan of Johor’s Royal Flight. The upgrade to a glass cockpit includes the installation of three EFI-890H Advanced Flight Displays.

AS332 L1 BACK WITH LOS ANGELES SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENTThe Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department has received its AS332 L1 Super Puma back following a 7,500 hour major inspection and 12-year major inspection by Vector Aerospace.

INDUSTRY NEWS

NETJETS EUROPE AND THE LONDON HELIPORT PARTNERSHIPNetJets Europe has entered into a partnership with The London Heliport, the only heliport in the city of London, and will be known as NetJets London Heliport and will feature extensive branding for the company.

Page 19: HeliOps Issue 102

19DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

Page 20: HeliOps Issue 102

20 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

Page 21: HeliOps Issue 102

21DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

AW609 THIRD PROTOTYPE READY TO FLYThe third AW609 TiltRotor prototype has under gone restrained ground run testing with all engines and flight tests are scheduled for mid-2016 in Philadelphia and certification is expected in 2018.

GLOBAL S92 PASSES 1 MILLION FLIGHT HOURSThe global fleet of Sikorsky S-92 helicopters has surpassed one million flight hours within less than 12 years. The S-92 was the first aircraft certified to FAA/EASA Part 29 requirements and has an availability rate that averages more than 95% each month.

EC135 FOR WALES AAWales is set to have the biggest air ambulance operation in the UK, as the Wales Air Ambulance Charity starts operations of its fourth aircraft, an EC135 T2e, from a new base at Cardiff Heliport.

UK AIR AMBULANCE UNVEILS NEW H145The UK Yorkshire Air Ambulance has taken delivery of its first H145 and will be fully operational following a full medical fit and crew training. A second H145 is on order and will be in service by spring 2017.

INDUSTRY NEWS

Page 22: HeliOps Issue 102

22 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

ERICKSON TO SUPPORT USCGThe U.S. Coast Guard in Alaska has chosen Erickson to provide transportation services and will use a Bell 212 to transport Research and Development Center staff and equipment to various locations in the Nome, Alaska.

CHINA ORDERS 100 H135sA Chinese consortium has signed a firm order for one hundred H135s to be assembled in China over the next 10 years at a new assembly line in Qingdao, Shandong Province and is valued at €700 million. The relaxation of China’s low-altitude airspace regulations has allowed for growth in the civil and parapublic services segments.

INDUSTRY NEWS

Page 23: HeliOps Issue 102

23DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

Page 24: HeliOps Issue 102

24 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

IRISH SAR REACHES 10,000 HOURSThe Irish Coastguard has achieved 10,000 S92 flight hours; CHC has provided the SAR service on behalf of the Irish Coastguard operating the S92 since 2012.

SAN BERNARDINO ASTAR BACK HOMEFollowing a 12-year inspection the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department has received its AS350 B3 from Vector Aerospace who completed the work.

INDUSTRY NEWS

NORWEGIAN SAR AW101 UNVEILEDAnders Anundsen, Norway’s Minister of Justice and Public Security, has officially unveiled the Norwegian All-Weather SAR AW101, with deliveries to Norway starting in 2017 and the final 16th completed by 2020.

Page 25: HeliOps Issue 102

LEADING THE INDUSTRY IN INTEGRATED AVIONICS

© 2014 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.

INNOVATIVE AIRCRAFT FOR ALL YOUR MISSION NEEDSBy offering exceptional fl ight performance with a fully integrated avionics console across our product classes, Bell Helicopter continues to change the way the world fl ies. Advanced tools like the Garmin G1000H™ enhance situational awareness by delivering easy-to-read information at-a-glance, improving operator safety. With ergonomically designed seating, a fully integrated autopilot option, mission-specifi c kits and accessories, Bell Helicopter is committed to providing aircraft that lead the industry in technology and safety.

INFORMATION AT-A-GLANCE AIRPORT MAPPING FOR SAFE APPROACH/DEPARTURE

SATELLITE WEATHER FOR SAFE NAVIGATION

© 2

015

BE

LL H

ELIC

OP

TE

R T

EX

TR

ON

IN

C.

BELLHELICOPTER.COM

Page 26: HeliOps Issue 102

26 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

EC-145Tel-Tail Floodlights

Tail Floodlight / Clam Shell Door Floodlights

Tail Floodlight / FFRL / Main Rotor Floodlights

www.devoreaviation.com

AW-139

D E L I V E R I N G G L O B A L C O V E R A G E O F T H E H E L I C O P T E R I N D U S T R Y

Focus... & Click!

The world’s most dynamic helo industry mag featuring the best helicopter photos on Instagram...

Page 27: HeliOps Issue 102

27DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

EC-145Tel-Tail Floodlights

Tail Floodlight / Clam Shell Door Floodlights

Tail Floodlight / FFRL / Main Rotor Floodlights

www.devoreaviation.com

AW-139TAP

FOR MORE INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

INDUSTRY NEWS

USCG AWARDED CONTRACT FOR MH-60S.A.F.E. Structure Designs has been awarded the contract to design and manufacture custom hangar equipment for the USCG MH-60 Jayhawk located at the Clearwater, Florida Air Station facility.

AW189s FOR RUSSIARussian Oil Company Rosneft have ordered twenty AW189s with deliveries to start in 2018 with three units to be assembled in Italy and seventeen at the HeliVert joint venture’s plant headquar-tered in Tomilino, Moscow.

Page 28: HeliOps Issue 102

28 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

Despite lower energy costs overall, one of the biggest expenditures for

helicopter operators is fuel. For these profit-starved operators, the

equation is simple: the lighter the helicopter, the less fuel it burns.

The persistently high cost of fuel makes it all the more important to shave

pounds off a helicopter — especially in the cockpit, which is crammed with

increasingly complex electronics.

At the same time, new-generation helicopters are placing greater demands

on pilots, requiring avionics manufacturers to squeeze more capabilities into

fewer and smaller components. The answer is to digitize all functions that are

performed with conventional gauges or paper.

These economic imperatives are boosting sales of the ultra-light,

miniaturized avionics provided by companies such as Honeywell, Rockwell

Collins, Garmin, Esterline Technologies, Jeppesen, navAero, and Astronautics.

These avionics providers are devoting considerable research and

development toward new, super-light and durable avionics, which is making

helicopters more efficient and flexible. It’s a technological trend that’s gaining

momentum and deserves to be applauded.

The aforementioned avionics companies design, manufacture and market

engineered aerospace products that lighten the already overburdened

helicopter pilot’s load. These products also boost the bottom lines of

helicopter operators and allow their fleets to expand their mission profiles.

Advanced avionics is allowing helicopters to fly faster, farther and higher, in

a multitude of roles ranging from emergency medical services to offshore oil

and gas transport to forestry and logging…you name it.

Among these products are electronic flight bags (EFBs); global positioning

systems; head-up pilot displays; temperature, pressure and speed sensors;

electrical power switching; and control and data communication devices.

THE AMERICAS

THE “PAPERLESS COCKPIT” REVOLUTION

BY JOHN P ERSINOS

EDI TOR TH E AMER ICAS

The push to reduce aircraft weight is changing the way helicopter pilots approach their flying routines, all for the better.

Page 29: HeliOps Issue 102

29DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

THE RISE OF THE EFBEmblematic of the movement toward lightweight electronics is the growing

popularity of EFBs, which are increasingly replacing anything made of paper in the

cockpit.

The FAA has ruled that EFBs may serve as substitutes for the paperwork that

pilots are required to carry with them into the cockpit.

The EFB derives its name from the pilot’s old-fashioned flight bag, which is a

cumbersome and heavy (up to 40 lbs. or more) documents pouch that pilots carry

into the cockpit. The EFB, which typically weighs only 1-5 pounds, replaces all of

those “dead tree” documents with digital media.

The EFB is a flexible computing platform designed to reduce or completely

replace paper-based reference material, charts and check lists typically found in the

pilot’s carry-on flight bag, including the aircrew operating manual and navigational

charts.

The EFB also can host software that automates other functions conventionally

performed by hand, such as performance take off calculations. In particular, for

EMS operations, the new hazard awareness features of EFBs make it easier to

comply with Part 135 obstacle height regulation.

According to the latest projections from the research firm Lucintel, the global

commercial aerospace avionics market will reach $8.3 billion in revenue by 2020,

for a compound annual growth rate of nearly 4% between now and 2020.

If embedded with the right applications software, EFBs can expedite a variety of

communication, navigation and surveillance functions.

A growing source of EFB demand is the VIP/executive helicopter market, where

weight and space are big concerns. For high-end corporate helicopter transport,

EFB data presentations such as approach charts and uplinked weather can be

integrated into the main front panel displays.

As the economy and corporate profits grow, leading corporate helicopter

models such as the S-76 are getting upgraded with the latest — and lightest —

avionics technologies.

New technologies such as real-time satellite weather and icing data, with GPS

integration, have further pushed the envelope of what EFBs can accomplish.

EFBs also offer software compatibility with the FAA’s Next Generation Air

Transportation System (NextGen), the sweeping transformation of U.S. airspace

procedures that will provide long-term demand for EFBs.

Officially called the Next Generation Air Transportation System, or “NextGen,”

the FAA’s multi-billion-dollar NAS overhaul utilizes GPS technology akin to what’s

now available in cars and on smartphones. NextGen is designed replace the existing

THE AMERICAS

Page 30: HeliOps Issue 102

30 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S Serving Papua New Guinea since 1975

and increasingly antiquated radar-based national air traffic control system developed

after World War II.

NextGen remains a top federal priority and its ultimate completion is not in doubt,

which in turn assures lasting demand for the complex avionics that are in synch with the

new grid.

Through its NextGen initiative, the FAA is developing an integrated grid of new

technologies and procedures to support greater capacity and less congestion.

Performance Based Navigation (PBN) is helping the FAA create a mechanism for

reaching NextGen’s goals.

PBN enhances safety, particularly in marginal weather, by minimizing diversions to

alternate airports. But PBN will convey other benefits as well.

According to the Air Transport Association, updating the nation’s outmoded Air

Traffic Control system will improve aircraft fuel efficiency and reduce the air transport

industry’s emissions by 10%-15%.

TOWARD A “GREENER” HELICOPTERIt’s in the area of air traffic management that two ostensibly unrelated disciplines —

environmentalism and avionics — find their nexus.

A campaign is now underway in nations around the world to reduce air transport’s carbon

footprint and to make the aviation industry a better world citizen. New “green” aviation

technologies are under development and implementation, many involving better avionics.

Helicopters face an image problem in many communities, as citizens continue view

them with suspicion. Greener helicopters will help counteract the NIMBY (Not in My Back

Yard) syndrome that stymies the full expansion of rotorcraft use in civilian life.

Meanwhile, the increasing use of Apple’s iPad and other tablet devices in cockpits is

spawning the development of a host of aviation “apps” that can be integrated into the EFB.

United Continental Holdings has rolled out thousands of Apple iPads to its United

Airlines and Continental pilots, as part of its continuing campaign to digitize the cockpits

of its two subsidiary airlines. EFBs are available to UAL’s pilots on their iPads via

dedicated application.

The parent company estimates that the change from paper to EFB-enabled iPads will

save both airlines a combined 326,000 gallons of jet fuel a year, by reducing cockpit

weight. For its part, AMR Corp.’s American Airlines has equipped the majority of its fleet

with EFB-enabled iPads.

The growing clamor for these technologies is good news for the helicopter

industry, especially hard-pressed offshore operators that are grappling with depressed

energy prices and are looking for any means to save money and make their aircraft

more efficient.

It’s further proof that beneficial technological change doesn’t just emanate from

Silicon Valley. Helicopters have been around for a long time, but they’re still in the

vanguard of innovation. HO

PERSONAL VOICE

Page 31: HeliOps Issue 102

Serving Papua New Guinea since 1975

SAFE, RELIABLE RESOURCES FOR ALL YOUR OIL, GAS & MINING REQUIREMENTS

Goroka Main Base +(675) 532-1833PO Box 342, EHP, Papua New Guineaenquiries@pacifichelicopters.aerowww.pacifichelicopters.aero

GEOLOGICAL EXPLORATIONAIRBORNE GEOPHYSICALHELI-RIG OFFSHORE & AERIAL SURVEY

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

Page 32: HeliOps Issue 102

32 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

Seems that a first flight in a helicopter has the knack of significantly

changing the direction of some people’s lives. Certainly this was the

case for Sarah Bowen who had a career in the music industry at the

time of her first passenger flight in a helicopter. She followed up that first

flight with an introductory lesson and was immediately sold on the idea of

becoming a professional helicopter pilot. Bowen translated the idea into

a PPL(H) in 2005 and went on to complete her CPL(H) in 2007, all while

continuing a six day working week as the manager of a recording studio.

“It was challenging, but I was determined to see it

through”. From very early on she discovered her

passion within helicoptering was for flight training,

deciding “[she] wanted to be an instructor from

day one”. Bowen enhanced her CPL(H) with an

Instructor Rating in 2008, at which time she was

able to “give up the day job” having been offered

a full time position with Helicentre Aviation. As

her flying and instructional experience grew,

Bowen added Flight Examiner to her qualifications

in 2011 and was subsequently appointed not only

Chief Flying Instructor but also Chief Pilot. The

determination and hard work continued to pay off

when shortly after, Bowen seized the opportunity

to become part owner of Helicentre Aviation and

took on the role of Managing Director.

As a Managing Director Bowen has overseen

the company’s significant expansion and guided

it from strength to strength. With around 30 staff,

including 12 fulltime flight instructors, she finds

a good deal of her efforts are spent on problem

solving the everyday business and personnel

challenges that constantly present themselves, yet

A GREATER VIEW

WOMEN IN THE HELICOPTER INDUSTRY

BY I VANA GORL IN

CAPTAIN SARAH BOWEN

Page 33: HeliOps Issue 102

33DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

she still makes the time to fulfil her additional role as Head of Training.

In 2015 after working for almost twelve months to develop an EASA

compliant Flight Instructor Course (FIC), Bowen became the UK’s first EASA

FIC Instructor on helicopters. It is in this role, where she is responsible for

flight instructor training and standardisation, that she gains her greatest

fulfilment. “Seeing the pilots I have trained teaching others to fly and

then testing their students gives me a great deal of satisfaction. I feel very

privileged to be playing such an important role in maintaining standards

amongst instructors, who are then fundamentally involved in training

our future helicopter pilots. The positive effect on industry standards is

noticeable and I find this very rewarding”.

Bowen has been instrumental in the development of an innovative new

professional helicopter pilot development program, the only one of its kind

in the UK. Resulting in an Honors level Bachelor degree from Middlesex

University in addition to a CPL(H), the whole program is facilitated through

Bowen’s training team at Helicentre Aviation. She is hoping that her

promotion of this course, as well as the more traditional paths to becoming a

helicopter pilot, may go some way towards encouraging more female school

leavers into the profession. “Regardless of gender we have found there

seems to be a general lack of awareness about the career opportunities

available in the helicopter industry, particularly within schools where

many young people make their initial career choices. If helicopter careers

were promoted better to the younger generation, where there tend to be

fairly equal numbers of male and female students, I think it would make a

difference …”

While Bowen has noticed a gradual increase in the number of women

showing an interest in flying helicopters, over the past 15 years only, in her

words, a small handful of have taken their piloting all the way trough to a

CPL(H) with her company.

In discussing gender bias, she says “I haven’t particularly found gender

to be an advantage or a disadvantage in any of the roles I perform”. Bowen

believes that gender equity within the industry will increase naturally as the

gender imbalance decreases.

As a Managing Director she is in a position to set the tone for the staff

and student under her charge to ensure the equity she’s enjoyed continues

within the industry. But it is not just within her own company that Bowen

attempt to influence the future of the industry as she enjoys sharing her

insights at career expositions and seminars, hoping her presentations might

be the tipping point, “that gets [people] started on a journey to a lifelong

career flying helicopters”.

Despite her own significant shift in careers, Bowen’s background in music

has not entirely fallen by the wayside – she now uses it as a way to wind

down after a challenging day in the helicopter industry. HO

A GREATER VIEW

Page 34: HeliOps Issue 102

34 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

As an air medical pilot in the United States for the last 15 years, I have

been witness to industry changes which have seen improvements in

safety. Improvements included equipment, technology, advances in

the airway structure, Night Vision Goggles on civilian aircraft and a continually

improving Risk Assessment Protocol that quantifies risk by shift, aircraft, flight

conditions and crew. Now with all of these incredible advances, why on earth

are stupid people allowed to purchase hand-held laser pointers capable of

temporarily distracting a flight crew at best or possibly cause injury to crews

vision with potentially more severe consequences.

In the last two years, I have been struck five times. The results varied with the

point of impact and length of exposure. On one occasion I was repeatedly struck

during a departure from a confined hospital helipad that required navigating

between parallel sets of high tension powerlines in a modestly powered

helicopter. For several minutes following the strike I saw white starbursts in my

entire focal region. On one occasion the local police helicopter was in the area,

and we were able to direct them over the common air-to-air frequency to the

general location of the event. They dispatched ground units to the area and

affected an arrest. The next morning when I saw the incident on the local news I

found myself very pleased.

While I get the novelty of harassing the neighbors cat with a laser and getting

him to chase it around a room, I fail to see the attraction to blinding the crew

of any aircraft. Available online or at any corner convenience store for as little

as $9.99 USD, I find that the uniqueness of this handheld, highly focused beam

of light may be too attractive to the idle user. Having acquired the device and

then on any given night shine that light in all of its glory into the night sky – all

without an ounce of forethought, imagining themselves inside a video game

tasked to target and strike anything moving through the sky.

Among their many lawful and productive applications, it was in 1974 that the

grocery store barcode scanners were where lasers first appeared in the general

population as a part of their daily lives. The first commercially available consumer

product to include a laser was the laser disc players that appeared in 1978. Laser

printers appeared in 1978.

Lasers now appear in optical disk drives, surgery, skin treatments; cutting

and welding materials; military and law enforcement devices for marking

targets as well as measuring range and speed, and fiber optic communications.

Laser lighting displays form part of the entertainment industry. The positive

applications are prolific, but with every great advance, some knucklehead will

EMS VIEWPOINT

LASER DANGER

BY M I K E

B I ASAT T I

Page 35: HeliOps Issue 102

35DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

find a way to bastardize the technology for their entertainment and in this case, with

dire consequences.

In 2015, the annual number of FAA-reported laser incidents nearly doubled to

7,703. This figure was a significant increase over the 2010-2014 period, which had

hovered around 3,500-4,000 occurrences per year. From January 1 through February

13, 2016, pilots filed 971 reports of laser illuminations with the U.S. Federal Aviation

Administration. This reporting is a 64% increase over the 591 reports filed during the

same period in 2015.

Interestingly while the total number of strikes is much higher in the United

States, the trajectory of new reports is on a similar path in Canada, with the UK not

far behind.

Interfering with the operation of an aircraft has long been a federal crime, but

Public Law 112-95, the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 signed by the

United States President, specifically made it a federal felony to knowingly point the

beam of a laser at an aircraft.

Pointing a laser at a police helicopter got a California man a 14-year prison

sentence. That result raised hopes by federal officials and pilots that the penalties

will discourage the threat to airline safety.

Some U.S. cities, such as Ocean City MD, Ocean City NJ, and Myrtle Beach SC

have severely restricted or banned laser pointer sales and possession. New Jersey’s

legislature passed a bill to ban laser pointer sales above 1mW; the bill was vetoed by

the Governor. New Zealand in 2013 restricted laser pointer sales above 1mW. Countries

such as Canada and the U.K. also are considering bans on laser pointer sales.

The Australian State of New South Wales officials got fed up after lasers hit

airplanes landing at Sydney’s airport and in March 2008 banned laser pointers and put

them in the same “dangerous weapon” category as guns and crossbows. Possession

and/or misuse of laser pointers can get you a fine or even up to 14 years in prison.

I think that has to be the direction to proceed. Impose a substantial fee to each

unit sold, mandate large signage next to the product where sold, require a registration

card to be filled out acknowledging comprehension of the dangers and consequences

including both the civil and criminal of errant use of the laser device. Then use the

money generated to fund a television and radio campaign educating the general

population of the severe hazards of pointing a laser at aircraft similar to the Public

Service Announcements (PSA’s) similar to those related to the use of tobacco

products, drinking and driving, and of course texting while driving.

Flying as part of an air medical helicopter crew is an amazing way to make a living

and an enormous source of pride for me and while there are risks in everything we do

in life, we and the companies we serve go to great lengths to manage, mitigate and

minimize known risks. With continued education, tightening of restrictions and some

healthy news coverage of additional offenders receiving some much-deserved prison

time and hefty fines, I’m very optimistic that we can begin to reduce this unnecessary

risk element to out flight planning.

Fly Safe. Land Safe. Go Home. Repeat. HO

EMS VIEWPOINT

Page 36: HeliOps Issue 102

36 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

In the last decade there has been a steady decline in the pass rate for pilot

rating knowledge tests. These tests in the past were commonly referred

to as “the written exam” and each specific rating had its own exam.

Today the FAA tests are administered in formal testing centers on dedicated

computers with software specific to this purpose. Although some of the

material has been updated, the test models haven’t changed. All tests are

multiple choice providing one correct answer and at least one deceptively

close answer. The FAA has a database showing the increase in knowledge

test failures for both first time applicants and repeat testers.

So why are we finding a higher failure rate? My first thought was perhaps

the candidates were not attending a ground school in preparation for both

the knowledge and practical exams. As I investigated a little closer, I found

that many candidates are attending ground school. I started discussions with

instructors across the US and found several common elements. One element

is poor study habits and another is a lack of interest in things that the pilot

candidate did not deem important. Let’s look at both of these problems.

Preparing for a private pilot exam should not be too overwhelming. In

addition to ground school, there are many resources available. Students can

use test guides that have actual questions and answers used in the exam.

These guides are quite thorough. They provide an outline of the material,

the actual questions, the answer list and an explanation on why a specific

answer is correct. There are also online practice tests that can be used for

the student to get ready for the real test. One of critical elements that seem

to be missing is “knowing how to study”. There are two big challenges when

developing a study technique. The first is simply setting aside the time to

study. The second is removing distractions from the study session. Effective

study must have dedicated time without cell phones and other devices that

constantly provide distraction. As we get more dependent on our personal

technology devices, taking a break to study becomes more difficult.

The other challenge is the lack of interest in items that the students

do not think is important or does not appear to apply to them. There are

many questions on the pilot knowledge tests that can be debated as

relevant, however that should not be a deciding factor when learning material

FLIGHT TRAINING

PASSING THE PILOT KNOWLEDGE EXAMS

BY T E RRY

PALMER

Page 37: HeliOps Issue 102

37DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

Year: 1985S/N: 1873TTAF: 12059.9Location: PNGEquipped with Onboard Cargo HookENGINE: Arriel 1B TSN: 8640.2AVIONICS:VHF COM KING KY196AVHF COM KING KY196AHF COM CODAN 2000TPX KING KT79AUDIO PANEL KING KMA24H-71ELT ARTEX C406 1HMFM COM TAIT 2000SATELLITE TRACKING SKY CONNECTGPS GARMIN GPSMAP 196INSPECTION: Next maintenance action: 50 h – Inspection at TT A/C 12109.9

ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT AND FEATURES:Whelen SirenDart External Cargo Basket LHAKV Cycle CounterPilot Floor WindowDual Seat ProvisionDart External MirrorPilot Windshield WiperDart Rear Baggage Compartment ExtenderINTERIOR: White and GreyPILOT(S)/ PASSENGERS: 1 / 5 or 1 / 6EXTERIOR: WhiteREMARKS / MISCELLANEOUS: The aircraft is operating, why the condition and component times will be subject to changes depending upon such operations.

FOR MORE INFOPacific Helicopters LimitedAirport RoadP.O Box 342, GorokaEastern Highlands ProvincePapua New Guineat: (675) 5321833f: (675) 5321503e: [email protected]

Page 38: HeliOps Issue 102

38 DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

for the exam. Some of the instructors found that they were required to

spend more time explaining why something is important than actually

teaching the material.

If you are preparing for a knowledge exam, you should find the following

advice helpful.

If possible, attend a formal ground school. Whether or not you attend

ground school, there are books specific to each pilot rating which should be

required reading such as the Private Pilot Manual or the Instrument Flying

Handbook. It is important to have a good base knowledge of the material. It

makes both the knowledge and practical test much easier and less stressful.

Study the material using all the resources available. Use good study

techniques with dedicated undisturbed time each day. Just putting a cell

phone in airplane mode is helpful if you can’t bring yourself to shut it off. Use

a study guide with actual questions and answers. Read through the book and

highlight the correct answers. Many students will find the visual technique

with the highlighted answers helpful. Reading through the questions and

highlighted answers at least seven times will provide a trigger for your brain,

even under the stress of taking an exam.

Only after thoroughly studying the material should you take practice tests.

Practice tests will show you what areas need additional study. They are not

very helpful without the study phase. Ten or more practice tests should bring

a variety of questions that will predict the outcome of the actual exam. If the

scores of the practice exams are consistent and high, you are ready for the

actual exam.

This method of study should ease the stress of the exams and prepare

you for the oral exam before the check ride. Most examiners will review the

candidate’s knowledge test to determine what subjects to ask in the oral

review. The higher the score on the knowledge test, the fewer questions the

examiner will be required to ask.

For each advanced rating, the information is more in depth and requires

a solid base knowledge and effective study techniques. The goal of all these

exams is to prepare pilots to make correct decisions in any situation, normal

or emergency. When facing a challenging situation we tend to revert to what

we learned and what we remember. Good study techniques helps build the

knowledge base, reducing stress and makes us safer pilots. So put down the

cell phone and open the book, then tweet about it later. HO

FLIGHT TRAINING

Page 39: HeliOps Issue 102

39DEL

IVER

ING

GLO

BAL COVERAGE OF THE HELIC

OPTER

IND

USTRY

2016

100ANNIVERSARY YEAR

I S S U E S

Page 40: HeliOps Issue 102

Geisinger Life Flight has been in existence for 35 years, growing from a single-helicopter operation into a major patient transport and EMS provider, servicing 42 counties in Pennsylvania. Unlike many EMS or medevac providers, Life Flight is a regional non-profit organization and on a recent visit, HeliOps learned how they got where they are today.

STORY BY LE IGH NE IL I PHOTOS BY NED DAWSON

Page 41: HeliOps Issue 102

41

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 42: HeliOps Issue 102

Geisinger Life Flight began

operations in 1981 as the second

hospital-based air-medical

program in Pennsylvania, with an

Alouette III of Evergreen Airways, based

in Danville, Pa. The switch to a twin-

engine BK117-A1 in 1983 made Geisinger

the first hospital-based program in the

world to use the type and since then

the organization has always been a

twin-engine helicopter EMS provider.

In 1988 a second helicopter was added

to the Danville base and in 1993 Life

Flight 2 was added and stationed at

State College as a 12-hour service. In

1998 a short-lived partnership with Penn

State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

began, with Geisinger becoming a part

of Hershey’s ‘Life Lion’ program for two

years, running a Dauphin. That merger

was un-wound in 2000, at which

time Keystone Helicopters became

the provider and the Dauphin was

eventually marketed. Life Flight 2 then

became a 24-hour ship. In July 2001 Life

Flight 3 was established as a 24-hour

base to cover the eastern areas. Life

Flight 4 was added in 2005 to cover

northern counties, LF 5 in 2006 for the

southern markets. Geisinger also

has an insurance product, Geisinger

Health Plan which insures 100’s of

thousands In Pennsylvania and some

surrounding states.

Post Hershey demerger Life Flight

was looking for something with longer

legs and that’s when they added the

S76A++ to the fleet. A second S76A++

was subsequently added, with one

BK117 remaining on strength.

Although the program progressed

to single-pilot IFR operations with the

BK117, experience showed the platform

to be somewhat range-limited in IFR

operations so, in about 2006, a desire

to develop a long-term strategic plan

that involved standardization of the

fleet with a suitably capable instrument

platform resulted in the selection of the

EC145, after consideration of every type

available on the market at that time. An

immediate order was placed for two

examples and Air Methods was chosen

to carry out the completions after a

competitive process. A major deciding

factor in the decision to go with Air

Methods was their willingness to

customize the medical and avionics fit-

out to the specific needs of Geisinger’s

operation and the preferences of

Page 43: HeliOps Issue 102
Page 44: HeliOps Issue 102

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 45: HeliOps Issue 102

45

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 46: HeliOps Issue 102

46

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

small – albeit high profile – string to

their bow. As one of the Life Flight team

pointed out, for the price of one EC145

(almost US$8 million) the organization

could build a complete community

medical clinic. A couple of BK117s also

remain on the fleet’s strength, with one

of them purchased only recently, having

been on lease for about six years prior.

The primary navigation system in

Geisinger pilots, crew and medical

personnel. The current EC145 fleet

of five machines was acquired over

a period of about six years, and the

timeframe was very dependent on

available funding. The economic

downturn in 2008 had an inevitable

impact on the plans for the fleet, as

Geisinger is a complete healthcare

provider and Life Flight is merely one

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

full page ad_Helishow 2016.pdf 1 12/9/15 10:08 AM

A major deciding factor in the decision to go with Air Methods was their willingness to customize the

medical and avionics fit-out to the specific needs of Geisinger’s operation and the preferences of

Geisinger pilots, crew and medical personnel.

Page 47: HeliOps Issue 102

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

full page ad_Helishow 2016.pdf 1 12/9/15 10:08 AM

Page 48: HeliOps Issue 102

48

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

the Geisinger EC145s is a Garmin 530,

with a Garmin 430 as the backup. Either

GPS can be read from the GNS200

screen and weather radar and dual

transponders are also fitted. Other

equipment includes a 12-inch super-

scanner light, an SX5 Nightsun and

a movable searchlight that includes

an IR light for use with night vision

goggles, as all Geisinger’s 145s are set

up for NVG operations. Pilots and crews

like the 145, considering it to be the

optimum platform for the current needs

of their services. Nothing, however, is

perfect and the one common less-than-

complimentary observation about the

type is that the 145’s rigid rotor system

does provide a harsher ride than most

competitors, but it is the least expensive

system to fit and to maintain. The

pilots say the 145 is excellent as an IFR

platform; particularly the dual autopilots

that provide genuine redundancy. In

the extremely unlikely event of a dual

engine failure, the autopilot will even

carry out an assisted autorotation right

to the ground, provided the pilot does

not fight against the system. Flight

following is provided by the Canadian

Skytrac system.

Every flight carries a pilot, nurse and

paramedic, and the medical staff are

trained to be crewmembers; capable

of operating the radios, map reading

and carrying out small tasks in the

aircraft to aid the pilot and minimize

the workload. The value of this training

and the degree of standardization in

the operation has been demonstrated

on at least two occasions of in-flight

oil pressure failure, with crewmembers

able to grab the emergency procedures

guide (one carried in both front and

rear of every machine) and immediately

Page 49: HeliOps Issue 102

CRITICAL VISION TECHNOLOGY To see, to save and protect

WORLD LEADING SEARCHLIGHTS• Superior beam quality

& efficiency• Selectable internal

multi-mission filters• Optional dual TI/TV

sensors• Industry-best reliability

NEW GEN GYROSTABILISED CAMERAS• Family of 200, 300 &

400mm systems• Single & multi LRU

configurations• Leading multi-spectral

sensors• Fully exportable

trakkasystems.com

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

Page 50: HeliOps Issue 102

Every flight carries a pilot, nurse and paramedic, and the medical staff are trained to be

crewmembers; capable of operating the radios, map reading and carrying out small tasks in the aircraft

to aid the pilot and minimize the workload.

begin reading through the correct

checklist while the pilot is able to focus

on priority one – flying the aircraft. All

of the current Life Flight pilots have an

initial military background but that is

not a requirement for employment, with

many highly regarded previous pilots

having been from a civilian background.

Emergency physicians undergoing

their residency also participate in the

Life Flight program as part of their

residency, each spending about a

month with Life Flight during their first

year as they learn the program. Then,

during their second and third years they

will fly with the program, gaining first-

hand experience in actual helicopter

EMS duty. This ties in perfectly with

Geisinger’s motto: “Caring.”

There is a trend in the US healthcare

system whereby the larger hospitals

and medical providers are taking over

or assimilating smaller satellite hospitals

and Geisinger is a good example of

this. Geisinger is constantly expanding

and evolving as a system and by the

time the fleet is due for a complete

upgrade in around ten years it is

Page 51: HeliOps Issue 102

51

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Presenting Heliops DownloadsClick on the covers to have access to a whole new world

of possibilities at your fingertips. Save it to iBooks, Kindle or any PDF reader – your magazine, your choice.

www.heliopsmag.com/magazine-downloads

Page 52: HeliOps Issue 102

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 53: HeliOps Issue 102

53

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 54: HeliOps Issue 102

54

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

foreseen that a move to fast pusher-

type machines – if they are available

on the market by then – is a very real

possibility. As Geisinger’s coverage area

grows dramatically with the ongoing

expansion, it is also possible that a

fixed-wing component will be added

to the fleet for long-distance, higher

speed transfers. Inter-facility transfers

currently make up about 65 percent

of Life Flight’s total mission load. Life

Flight program manager Jerry Splitt

reports that around 70 percent of

patients flown by Life Flight are brought

to the Geisinger medical center at the

Danville facility, despite it being one of

eight trauma centers in the program’s

area of operation and an inviolable

state requirement to transport patients

requiring trauma care to the nearest

available trauma facility. This is

one reason that he would like to

see the substantial in-house

maintenance operation moved to its

own separate facility at some point in

the future, funding permitting, reducing

disruption to both aspects of the

program’s operations.

Geisinger Health System’s associate

chief administrative officer, Tom Weir,

considers that moves made during the

last few years have all been strategically

planned to ensure that Life Flight

and the entire Geisinger organization

are best placed to move forward in

a rapidly evolving environment. As

far as Life Flight is concerned, the

upgrading of the fleet with EC145s,

Page 55: HeliOps Issue 102

• Tip-to-tail maintenance support

• Inventory and tooling support

• Pilot and AMT training

• Technical and reliability support

• Flight crews

• Flexible financing options

Let our experience guide you to a partnered solution from a diverse fleet featuring some of the most advanced helicopters in the industry. Era provides helicopters and related services to third-party helicopter operators and customers in the United States, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, India, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom.

Operating or Leasing solutions can be custom tailored for any mission anywhere in the world to include:

Safe, Efficient, Reliable

www.erahelicopters.com

Partnered Solutions

Page 56: HeliOps Issue 102

the establishment of several new

bases and obtaining their own Part 135

certification are major components in

the development of an organizational

structure that is able to cope with

expansion and mission evolution over

the coming years. He voiced concern

about an oversupply of EMS and

medical transport helicopters by a

number of service providers, stating,

“There are close to 40 helicopters just

in our market here in Pennsylvania. Over

time, the insurance squeeze and market

forces will sort some of that out, but it’s

a big reason why we have to position

ourselves to be highly flexible, safe

and efficient.”

The robust safety systems and

culture within Life Flight have also been

established with a view to coping with

expansion. Peter Carros, the director

of safety, does not answer to anyone

A substantial investment of Life Flight resources is utilized on PR, community service and public

education. Visits to county fairs and events with EMS and 911 centers are fairly commonplace.

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

Page 57: HeliOps Issue 102

57

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 58: HeliOps Issue 102

58

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

within program operations, but directly

to Tom Weir. He is a full-time employee

and occasional line pilot himself so is

always on hand to oversee all safety

aspects of the operation. As good

as it is, the program has not been

without incident. In February of 2013,

a Life Flight helicopter on approach

struck a crane that was operating in

close proximity to the rooftop helipad.

Fortunately there were no injuries,

although the machine received damage.

What is relevant though, is that after

a thorough investigation and analysis

of the incident, numerous minor

contributing factors were identified.

As is usually the case, variations in

any or each factor could have avoided

the incident. Life Flight’s response

was to immediately take remedial

action on every possible factor to

eliminate or minimize the possibility of

re-occurrence. As Splitt said, “God gave

us this chance to fix what was wrong

without losing anyone.”

While Geisinger Health System is

expanding consistently throughout

Pennsylvania, there are no immediate

and definite plans for the expansion of

Life Flight’s aviation fleet. The current

fleet size of seven machines will remain

for some time, with the only likely

change being the replacement of older

BKs with EC145s as funding permits.

From the first days with two pilots and

a couple of medical personnel, the

staffing level of Life Flight has grown

to more than 20 pilots and a total of

around 100 people involved in the

running and conduct of the operation.

With five bases, its own communication

and dispatch center, dedicated

maintenance facility with substantial

spares holding and full administrative

support, Geisinger Life Flight is an

impressive example of carefully

planned and structured growth.

Geisinger’s continuous expansion,

with new acquisitions of hospitals

and health facilities throughout

Page 60: HeliOps Issue 102

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 61: HeliOps Issue 102

61

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 62: HeliOps Issue 102

62

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 63: HeliOps Issue 102

63

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Pennsylvania and into other states,

means that the Life Flight program

will, however, inevitably be required

to respond to new service demands

and potential expansion. Part of this

future planning is the establishment of

further infrastructure to incorporate

a ground transport system (Ground

service went into service January 2016)

This will be vital to the efficiency and

cost management of Geisinger’s EMS

and medical transport system and

will undoubtedly involve substantial

evolution of Life Flight’s organizational

and operational structure. The first

ground transport ambulance will likely

be stationed at the Danville base,

but not all bases will include ground-

based capability. As Splitt pointed out,

many areas and facilities already have

excellent relationships with existing

ground-based medical transport

operators and retention of those service

agreements or arrangements makes

good economic and operational sense.

Splitt is appreciative of the high level

of administrative support the program

gets from Geisinger leadership and

works very closely with Weir, whom

he describes as fully aware of the

benefits and totally committed to

supporting the program.

Standardization is already a hallmark

of Life Flight’s operation and the

expansion into a ground-based role

will benefit from this philosophy, with

the ground ambulances being fitted

with the same equipment package as

the helicopters, so crews and medical

professionals will have total familiarity

with what is available to them as they

complete their tasks, be they on an

airborne or ground-based mission.

It also means that the patients are

guaranteed the same standard of

care, regardless of the type of asset

Page 64: HeliOps Issue 102

64

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

dispatched to their aid. The first

ground unit is on order and will even

bear the same distinctive paint scheme

as the helicopters, ensuring the

maximum public identification of the

ambulances as part of the Geisinger

and Life Flight ‘brand’.

Weir does have some concerns over

what he sees looming in the future

of emergency healthcare programs

such as Life Flight. “I foresee much

more competitive supply and demand

issues in the surgical specialties that

I represent in emergency medicine.

There are simply not enough people

within the residency programs to

fill those voids and I think that the

reduced availability of a broad range

of specialist medical services will drive

how patients are going to flow. Another

thing that goes alongside that is the

state of Pennsylvania’s significant

administrative overhead involved with

being a designated trauma center.” He

cites both the foregoing issues as good

reasons for designing the healthcare

network with triage and patient flow as

major considerations. Geisinger’s own

system is evolving very much as a ‘hub

and spoke’ structure to make the best,

most efficient use of all the assets and

facilities at their disposal. Geisinger’s

hospital at Danville is a level-1 trauma

center (the highest level), as well as

a training hospital and includes every

type of specialty care, apart from a

burns unit. For this reason, it receives

a large number of patients from a wide

variety of other facilities.

A substantial investment of

Life Flight resources is utilized on

PR, community service and public

education. Visits to county fairs and

events with EMS and 911 centers are

fairly commonplace. As a result of

these efforts and the day-to-day duties

of Life Flight, despite the growing

number of competitors, the majority

of Pennsylvania residents immediately

recognize the distinctive machines as

being Life Flight and being Geisinger.

This public profile is an important

Page 65: HeliOps Issue 102

65

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 66: HeliOps Issue 102

66

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 67: HeliOps Issue 102

67

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

benefit to the organization as a whole.

Equally important in the competitive

American healthcare system are

regular visits to other hospitals and

medical facilities to ensure that medical

professionals throughout the state are

familiar with the medical and transport

services that Geisinger is able to offer.

With a joint venture company operating

throughout the US and globally, lessons

learned by Geisinger in Pennsylvania are

now being made available for export

elsewhere to other organizations but

that system does not include the Life

Flight concept and operating model. As

Tom Weir pointed out, there are very

few medical service providers

that function at the level of Geisinger

and therefore little opportunity to

recreate something on the scale of the

Life Flight program.

Splitt related a good example of

the way in which Life Flight interacts

with other community hospitals; one

that has received recent, national

news coverage. A 22-month old was

involved in an ice-water drowning

incident and found with no pulse.

On-scene attendees initially treated

the child and commenced CPR. He

was subsequently taken to a

community hospital in Lewisburg but

it was then realized that he needed to

be taken to a level-1 trauma center and

Life Flight was called to transfer him

to Danville.

CPR had been continuous since

the child was found and continued in

the helicopter; no easy task. CPR did

not cease until the warming treatment

bypass was commenced, by which

time 101 minutes had elapsed. Almost

unbelievably, the child was revived

and recovered fully, with no apparent

ill effects. Splitt’s obvious pleasure

and pride in the outcome is clear, and

helps illustrate the difference between

Life Flight and many other EMS

operators. He is at pains to point out

that, as part of the hospital, the medical

Page 68: HeliOps Issue 102

68

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

professionals and crews see Life Flight

very much as a medical tool rather than

an aviation business. That ethos is also

evidenced in the standard direction

given to all Life Flight personnel – at all

times they are to take the action that

is in the best interests of the patient. If

circumstances dictate, for example, that

upon arrival at a scene it is determined

that ground transport is a medically

preferred option, then the patient will

be moved by an available ambulance

and the cost of the helicopter mission

is not a consideration in any way. There

are even agreements in place with other

community hospitals and 911 centers

that in the event of a requirement for

an on-scene helicopter EMS service,

they call Life Flight, who will act on

their behalf and dispatch the nearest

EMS helicopter, regardless of which

operator’s it is.

Life Flight has what is described as

an extremely good, transparent working

relationship with their local FAA FSDOs

and considers them to be partners

in the operation – definitely not a

sentiment universally expressed with in

the fraternity of aviation operators. This

does, however give a clear insight into

just how professionally and successfully

Geisinger Life Flight has built itself into

what should be seen as an industry

standard. HO

Page 69: HeliOps Issue 102

69

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 70: HeliOps Issue 102

FRIEND OR FOE TO CIVILIAN HELICOPTERS?

The increasing use of unmanned aerial vehicles (aka drones) is

among the hottest aviation trends today. Should the helicopter

industry be worried?

STORY BY JOHN PERS INOS

PHOTO SOURCES – THE RESPECTIVE OEMS

Page 71: HeliOps Issue 102

71

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

One of its most popular UAVs is

the camera-carrying Phantom,

manufactured by China-based DJI.

Page 72: HeliOps Issue 102

72

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Commercial drones are evolving

from science fiction to big

business. These unmanned

aerial vehicles (UAV) are increasingly

adopting not just military roles once

reserved for helicopters but important

civilian ones as well.

The rise of the UAV appears to be an

unstoppable trend. The question is, will it

help or hurt the helicopter business?

In the public safety sector, officials

increasingly using drones include police

officers and professional firefighters,

as well as a variety of professional and

volunteer emergency medical service

providers who respond to natural

disasters, human-made disasters and

crimes.

Indeed, the uses of UAVs for roles

once reserved for ground vehicles,

rotorcraft or fixed-wing aircraft are

virtually limitless, from topographical

mapping to utility line repairs to oil

pipeline inspections.

There’s no disputing the fact that

sales of UAVs for commercial and

consumer uses have been soaring.

According to a report in January from

the Consumer Technology Association,

U.S. consumers bought 1.1 million new

drones in 2015, compared with 450,000

in 2014 and a meager 128,000 in 2013.

60 Minutes correspondent Morley

Safer, who died in May after serving as a

huge presence on television journalism

for nearly 50 years, aptly summed up

the UAV industry’s growing importance

in a prescient episode of the CBS news

magazine that aired in March 2014:

“It may surprise you to learn that

drones are flying across America,”

Safer’s well-modulated voice intoned.

“Not the impersonal killing machines

that patrol the badlands overseas, but

drones nonetheless. Used by the FBI,

by university researchers, by amateur

photographers, even by your nosy

neighbors. Domestic drones are

poised to become a multibillion-dollar

industry, revolutionizing everything

from crop management down on the

farm to, possibly, package delivery to

your doorstep.”

The booming popularity of

Jeff Bezos, CEO of

e-commerce giant

Amazon, has put

forth the bold “game

changing” vision of

delivering packages

door-to-door via drones.

rise to new heights.

the efficiency you expect.the speed you demand.

for more info, visit us atwww.analarcorp.com

analar corporation • 41 airpark road • princeton, nj 08540 office phone: (609) 921-7681 • after hours phone: (908) 794-7632

Page 73: HeliOps Issue 102

rise to new heights.

the efficiency you expect.the speed you demand.

for more info, visit us atwww.analarcorp.com

analar corporation • 41 airpark road • princeton, nj 08540 office phone: (609) 921-7681 • after hours phone: (908) 794-7632

Page 74: HeliOps Issue 102

74

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

“UAVs shaped as airplanes or

helicopters can do many things,”

Carey observes. “Package delivery and

atmospheric satellites are only among

the edgier concepts.”

In a significant move forward for the

every-day, mainstream deployment of

commercial drones, Wal-Mart Stores

announced in June that it was six to nine

months from beginning to use drones to

check warehouse inventories in the U.S.

Aerospace consultancy Teal Group

estimates that the civil/commercial

market for UAVs will reach a value of $1

billion annually in 2023. That’s still less

than 10% of the overall UAV market,

but then again, the commercial drone

industry is still in its infancy and it’s

starting at a low base.

Para-public deployment of UAVs

by government agencies such as the

U.S. Coast Guard, Customs, and Border

Patrol constitute the biggest single

segment of the market, because of the

federal government’s easier access to

regulated airspace. The commercial

side constitutes miniature and small

UAVs, which are greater in numbers but

lesser in value.

In the military sector, the UAV is

revolutionizing the use of power in

regions around the world, especially

commercial UAVs prompted the U.S.

Federal Aviation Administration this year

to release long-anticipated new rules

governing the use of these futuristic

flying machines. Among the major

provisions is the mandated registration

of drones with the FAA.

Attesting to the maturation of drones

into a full-fledged commercial industry,

an army of lobbyists from K Street’s

“Gucci Gulch” succeeded in softening

the FAA’s safety and privacy rules, to

create more flexibility for the testing

and deployment of drones. Leading the

charge was e-commerce giant Amazon,

which intends to use drones for delivery.

“Small multi-rotor drones have

shown utility for filmmaking, flare stack

inspection, real estate photography,

agricultural monitoring, law enforcement

and many other applications,” says long-

time aerospace journalist Bill Carey,

a former contributor to Rotor & Wing

magazine and now senior editor with

Aviation International News. “They can

be deployed at a fraction of the cost and

less of the risk associated with manned

helicopters.”

An expert on UAVs, Carey is the

author of Enter the Drones: The FAA

and UAVs in America, a new book

released in 2016.

There’s no disputing the fact that sales of UAVs for commercial and consumer uses have been soaring.

According to a report in January from the Consumer Technology Association, U.S. consumers bought

1.1 million new drones in 2015, compared with 450,000 in 2014 and a meager 128,000 in 2013.

Page 75: HeliOps Issue 102

75

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

For proof, look no further than the annual International Consumer Electronics Show (CES) show in Las Vegas, an influential venue for a parade of gee-whiz gadgets right out of science fiction. Stealing the show in 2016 was the UAV. More than 20 companies at CES displayed dozens of drone types. One popular gadget follows and films players in extreme sports, to create exciting aerial movies of their exploits.

in “hot spots” in Afghanistan and Iraq,

where Pentagon and CIA planners are

increasingly deploying UAVs in the fight

against terrorism. This much has been

known for years, as epitomized in the

popular imagination by the Predator

hunter-killer drone, which gets plenty

of press for its killings of terrorists

overseas. More than any other pilotless

device, the Predator has brought the

UAV to widespread public awareness.

But the big story now is commercial

UAVs and their inexorable spread into

workaday roles — including those once

reserved for helicopters.

GEE-WHIZ GADGETSFor proof, look no further than

the annual International Consumer

Electronics Show (CES) show in Las

Vegas, an influential venue for a parade

of gee-whiz gadgets right out of science

fiction. Stealing the show in 2016 was the

UAV. More than 20 companies at CES

displayed dozens of drone types. One

popular gadget follows and films players

in extreme sports, to create exciting

aerial movies of their exploits.

An up-and-coming commercial drone

maker is DJI, a China-based technology

company that manufactures commercial

and recreational UAVs for aerial

photography and videography. One of

its most popular models is the camera-

carrying Phantom. Camera-carrying

drones already are poplar newsgathering

devices for television stations.

The commercial industry leader is

California-based AeroVironment, The

company provides a wide variety of

drones that’s prized by the military, but

it also makes a host of smaller UAVs

that can be used for everything from

package delivery to police surveillance.

As drones increasingly pervade civilian

society, AeroVironment will reap

increasing profits.

AeroVironment is a major military

contractor but it would benefit the

most from the mainstreaming of small-

scale civilian drones, because these

miniaturized UAVs are its specialty. The

company boasts a 30% share of the UAV

market, making it the leader by far.

AeroVironment’s forte is making small

and nimble UAVs that have the ability to

Page 76: HeliOps Issue 102

76

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

carry payloads and are fitted with GPS

systems and contact avoidance systems.

These are the types of units that would

help Amazon’s CEO Jeff Bezos realize

his bold vision of delivering packages

door-to-door via drones.

Amazon recently made headlines

with its announcement that it intended

to develop a program whereby its

packages could be delivered to

customers’ door via drones. It seems far-

fetched, but considering advancements

in drone technology not all that

improbable. The biggest hurdle, of

course, is reconciling growing drone use

with FAA regulation of civilian airspace,

a thorny issue that was finally (but not

permanently) reconciled this year.

In the meantime, though, increasing

numbers of federal organizations as

well as local police departments are

adopting UAVs for airborne surveillance

and monitoring.

According to a recent report from

the Association for Unmanned Vehicle

Systems International (AUVSI), the

integration of UAVs into commercial

roles will by 2025 create 100,000

jobs and generate revenue of $82 billion.

The report states that while there are

multiple uses for UAVs in the national

airspace, precision agriculture

and public safety are the most

promising commercial and civil uses,

comprising about 90% of the known

potential markets.

POLICE EYES IN THE SKIESPolice departments are embracing

drones to such a degree, it prompted the

Airborne Law Enforcement Association

(ALEA) at its most recent annual expo

(in 2015) to offer a three-day course

on how to procure and operate drones,

within regulatory and legal boundaries.

So far, the limited application of

UAVs in police work has focused on

information gathering over a variety of

police situations, not the least of which

has involved crowd control, traffic

accident/crime scene photography

and surveillance over static police

incidents. Police also use drones for

search and rescue and to monitor civil

unrest as it unfolds.

Jim Di Giovanna, CEO of the

Public Safety Aviation Accreditation

Commission, says UAVs will continue into

the foreseeable future to assist police

departments in two major areas:

t Provide aerial surveillance similar to

that of helicopters, i.e., the ability

to hover and/or fly over a static

situation and transmit real time video

to an incident command post.

t Provide valuable command

and control and/or intelligence

information over potential hostile

environments where the use of a

manned helicopter would expose

the crew and aircraft to potentially

hazardous conditions.

A career law enforcement and

military helicopter pilot, Di Giovanna

is recognized as an expert in aviation

law enforcement by the ALEA and the

National Transportation and Safety

Board. He says UAVs play a valuable

supplemental role with helicopters, but

can’t replace the unique attributes of

manned rotorcraft.

“UAVs can certainly enhance

crime fighting by supplementing

Page 77: HeliOps Issue 102

77

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

manned aircraft,” Di Giovanna says.

“Unfortunately, many law enforcement

executives and municipal politicians view

UAVs as a less expensive alternative

to manned aircraft and believe that

UAVs can successfully replace their

manned fleet. Many of us in airborne law

enforcement believe that this opinion is

misguided and simply being used as a

cost cutting measure.”

Case in point is the police

department of Toledo, Ohio, which is

considering grounding its R44 helicopter

and replacing it with a small UAV to save

the cost of overhauling the aircraft.

Fact is, manned aircraft continue to

prove their value by providing critical,

real time information that assists the

tactical response of ground units to an

active police incident. This information

can be used by ground units to make

sound tactical and safe decisions about

how to respond to crime in progress.

The greatest value associated with

this type of information is the knowledge

and expertise of the tactical flight officer

and how this information is conveyed to

ground units to gain an instantaneous

advantage and provide a greater margin

of safety for those on the ground the

officer is supporting. These are split-

second human judgment calls that only a

pilot on the scene can make.

Di Giovanna asserts: “For those

of us who have been involved in this

business for many years, this application

of airborne law enforcement cannot be

replaced by a UAV.”

DOWN ON THE FARM

UAVs deployed for precision

agriculture include remote sensing

and precision application. Farmers

are increasingly using remote sensors

The Elbit-made

Hermes 450 is a

versatile drone

suitable for a host

of uses, particularly

agriculture.

Page 78: HeliOps Issue 102

78

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

to scan plants for disease and pest

destruction, as well as to record growth

rates and hydration needs. These

sensors are attached to UAVs, when in

the past the job was done by ground

vehicles or helicopters.

Precision application via UAVs, a

method particularly beneficial for crop

farmers and horticulturists, implements

targeted spray techniques to more

selectively and efficiently cover plants

and fields. This allows farmers to apply

only the necessary pesticide or nutrient

to each plant, reducing the total amount

sprayed and thereby saving money as

well as helping the environment.

In May, a drone to test precision

agriculture tactics made its inaugural

flight in North Dakota. The Hermes 450,

manufactured by Israel-based Elbit

Systems, took off from the Hillsboro, ND

airport to initiate a summer-long project

that will snap photos of farmland in the

state’s fertile Red River Valley.

The Elbit-made Hermes 450 is a

versatile drone suitable for a host of

uses in addition to agriculture, including

Border Patrol. The Hermes test in

North Dakota this summer is designed

to demonstrate whether the UAV is

more efficient to capture imagery of

agricultural land than satellites, airplanes

or helicopters.

UNANSWERED QUESTIONSIt all begs the question: Will UAVs put

helicopter pilots of out business?

As UAVs are increasingly introduced,

some uses will replace existing

capabilities because of the greater

More than any other

pilotless device,

the Predator has

brought the UAV to

widespread public

awareness.

Page 79: HeliOps Issue 102

79

Year: 1981S/N: 51400TTAF: 10863.7Location: PNGGreat looking Bell 206L-3 refurbished late 2012. Equipped with cargo hook.ENGINE 250-C30P TSN: 5825.7AVIONICS:VHF COM King KY 196AVHF COM King KY 196AAUDIO King KMA 24HHF COM Icom IC F7000FM COM Tait 2000 11TPX KT76AGPS Garmin 196ELT Artex 110-406Satellite tracking SpidertracksINSPECTION: Next maintenance action: 50 h- Inspection at TT A/C 10874.9ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT AND FEATURES:Onboard Cargo HookDart Baggage Compartment ExtenderDart Mirror KitWhelen SirenDart PAX Access Steps LH and RHDart Access Steps LH and RHDart Maintenance Steps LH Fwd and Rear, RH Fwd and RearINTERIOR: Beige and GreyPILOT(S)/ PASSENGERS: 1/6EXTERIOR: Red with white Landing GearREMARKS / MISCELLANEOUS: The helicopter was refurbished internally and externally November 2012 as well as a new Wiring Loom fitted. The aircraft is operating, why the condition and component times will be subject to changes depending upon such operations.

FOR MORE INFOPacific Helicopters LimitedAirport RoadP.O Box 342, GorokaEastern Highlands ProvincePapua New Guineat: (675) 5321833f: (675) 5321503e: [email protected]

Page 80: HeliOps Issue 102

80

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

efficiencies to be realized by using a

UAV compared to, say, a fixed-wing

plane or helicopter. But helicopter

pilots shouldn’t send out their resumes,

just yet. So far, it appears that UAVs

are for the most part complementing,

not completely replacing helicopters.

Consider Connecticut-based Kaman

Aerospace, which has been developing

an unmanned version of its utility

helicopter the K-MAX as far back

as 1998. Known for its emphasis on

engineering, Kaman is typically in the

vanguard of rotorcraft innovation. The

unmanned K-MAX is now widely used

for firefighting, logging and heavy lift,

in concert with manned helicopters. It’s

a prime example of commercial UAVs

and helicopters forging a symbiotic

relationship.

One possible headwind for the

spread of UAVs into the commercial

sphere is the problem of liability

insurance. Suppose a UAV flown by

a public safety agency malfunctions

and crashes into a building and injures

bystanders. Presumably, this accident

is covered by the local government’s

umbrella insurance policy. But in our

litigious society, anything is possible.

The spread of UAVs could usher in

an era of civil lawsuits. In the meantime,

more cautious and risk-averse agencies

will be prone to stick with the use of

conventional helicopters, for which the

legal terrain is well explored.

Concerns over civil liberties pose

another obstacle. U.S. citizens possess

scant legal privacy protections from

aerial surveillance performed by drones.

The United States Supreme Court has

ruled that individuals don’t enjoy the

right to privacy from police observation

from public airspace.

The American Civil Liberties Union

has called for more legal privacy

protections from these “eyes in the

skies,” as well as more transparency

from airborne police departments as to

how drones are deployed. Until these

policy and legal questions are ironed

out, the use of pilotless machines for

police work will face limitations. It’s

likely that more police departments will

follow the footsteps of the Seattle Police

Department, which recently scuttled

plans to use drones after residents

vehemently objected.

Considering the fact that it took

the FAA several years to finally issue

new regulations governing commercial

drones in public airspace, the country’s

Every Second Counts

Helicopters | Aeronautics | Electronics, Defence & Security Systems | Space

leonardocompany.com

Finmeccanica is now Leonardo - inspired by the vision, curiosity and creativity of the great master inventor - designing the technology of tomorrow.

Leonardo Helicopter Division provides unique, integrated and affordable products to the global healthcare delivery system.

Together, bringing care to the patient with the best aero-medical solution.

HeliOps-Every Second Counts.indd 1 29/04/16 13:18

Fact is, manned aircraft continue to prove their value by providing critical, real time information that

assists the tactical response of ground units to an active police incident. This information can be used

by ground units to make sound tactical and safe decisions about how to respond to crime in progress.

Page 81: HeliOps Issue 102

Every Second Counts

Helicopters | Aeronautics | Electronics, Defence & Security Systems | Space

leonardocompany.com

Finmeccanica is now Leonardo - inspired by the vision, curiosity and creativity of the great master inventor - designing the technology of tomorrow.

Leonardo Helicopter Division provides unique, integrated and affordable products to the global healthcare delivery system.

Together, bringing care to the patient with the best aero-medical solution.

HeliOps-Every Second Counts.indd 1 29/04/16 13:18

Page 82: HeliOps Issue 102

82

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

regulatory structure is likely to

lag behind the technology’s rapid

development.

“For the most part, most of us in law

enforcement still view small UAVs as

an enhancement to our crime fighting

tool box and another resource that can

be useful in gathering information or

evidence,” Di Giovanna says. “That

being said, there is a big difference

between gathering information and

obtaining evidence.”

Tom Scarlett, an attorney and

aviation expert based in Washington,

DC, points out that Information

obtained from above is made available

to immediately assist ground units in

responding to a call and in most cases, is

not regulated if not used as evidence.

However, when information is used

as evidence, it must meet the same rules

of evidence regulated by the Fourth

Amendment and case law for it to be

used by a prosecutor. “These legal rules

apply to both manned and unmanned

aircraft,” Scarlett explains.

The biggest difference is the size of

the small UAV compared to a manned

aircraft and the ability of a small device

to gather information undetected.

Hence the privacy concerns,

which Di Giovanna says should be

focused on the private, unregulated use

of drones as opposed to use by

law enforcement.

The upshot is that, for now, UAVs

and helicopters will peacefully co-exist

in the commercial sector, akin to the

way that UAVs and helicopters are

partnered on the battlefield for greater

war-fighting synergies. UAVs constitute

a disruptive technology, for sure, but

their capabilities should be embraced

and not feared by the commercial

helicopter community.

Besides, UAVs are here to stay. To

quote “The Borg” in the Star Trek series:

“Resistance is futile.” HO

The American Civil Liberties Union has called for more legal privacy protections from these “eyes in the skies,” as well as more transparency from

airborne police departments as to how drones are deployed. Until these policy and legal questions are ironed out, the use of pilotless machines for police

work will face limitations. It’s likely that more police departments will follow the footsteps of the Seattle Police Department, which recently scuttled plans to

use drones after residents vehemently objected.

Page 83: HeliOps Issue 102

83

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

The Unmanned

K-MAX is now

widely used for

firefighting, logging

and heavy lift. It’s

a prime example of

commercial UAVs

and helicopters

forging a symbiotic

relationship.

Page 84: HeliOps Issue 102

The Kamov Ka-62 is the latest Russian medium twin, designed from the outset to meet the needs of demanding civil and parapublic customers at home and abroad. ALEXANDER MLADENOV reports on this new Russian entrant to the helicopter industry.

Page 85: HeliOps Issue 102

85

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 86: HeliOps Issue 102

86

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

The Kamov Ka-62 made its long-delayed maiden flight on 28 April

2016 at the AAC (Arsenyev Aviation Company) Progress aviation

plant’s factory airfield located in the city of Arsenyev, in Russia’s

Far East region. Kamov Design Bureau’s Chief Test Pilot, Vitaly Lebedev

and co-pilot Nail Azin, another Kamov test pilot, were at the controls of

the first prototype of the Ka-62 known as the OP-1. The maiden flight

took about ten minutes and included a hover with numerous banking,

yawing and turning movements intended to assess the controllability and

stability of the helicopter.

The Ka-62’s development was launched by the Moscow-based Kamov

Design Bureau in 2011, with original plans for its initial flight to take

place in 2013. The development effort however, was a slow undertaking

due to the high proportion of new systems (such as the all-new digital

flight/navigation suite and the digital general systems management

and monitoring system), the Western powerplant. This is coupled with

a variety of organisational problems inside Russian Helicopters (as the

company still has difficulties to define a commercially-viable product line

of civil models) as well some other more or less serious issues stemming

from the cooperation with some of the foreign partners, such as the

transmission supplier.

Page 87: HeliOps Issue 102

87

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

After completing a series of 122 or more development test flights and an

ambitious program of up to 450 certification flights, Russian civil certification is now

not expected before 2018. Certification will be to the Russian AP-29 airworthiness

requirements. Kamov is also targeting certification of the type by the European

Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) but this is not expected until 2020 at the earliest.

Three prototypes (OP-1, OP-2 and OP-3) were built at the AAC Progress plant

for the intense flight test and certification effort, as well as an “iron bird” used for

system testing and verification, and a fuselage for static tests. Another test rig,

featuring a Ka-62 fuselage complete with engines and a full-scale transmission

system, had been built at KumAPE plant in Kumertau and before the Ka-62’s

maiden flight it was required to complete no less than 250 hours of testing. The

Kumerau rig made its first engine run in late August 2015.

The lead designer, Alexander Vagin, says the Ka-62 will be certified in offshore

and passenger transport configurations with 12 and 15 seats before later developing

configurations for VIP, utility, SAR and law enforcement.

BREAKING FROM TRADITION Unlike all other models developed by Kamov that use the co-axial rotor scheme,

the Ka-62 features a conventional design with a five-bladed main rotor and a

shrouded tail rotor (the so-called fantail type). This particular layout is intended

to provide higher speed, low levels of vibration and a large useful volume within

the fuselage. Utilising experience from the development of the military Ka-60, the

new Kamov machine is loosely based on the design of its military predecessor. Yet

it also features an impressive range of all-new features in an effort to turn it into a

commercially attractive option in what is a very crowded world market for medium

twin turbine helicopters.

Page 88: HeliOps Issue 102

88

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

The Ka-62 weight and size is just on the limit where the fantail can be regarded

as an effective design solution. This specific feature, as Vagin says, was selected

because of its extra safety benefits when operating in urban environment where

it is required to land in confined locations, surrounded by people, tall trees and

buildings. Vagin also point out that in case of tail rotor or intermediate gearbox

failure, the large fin has also been designed to provide enough directional stability

to allow a rolling landing at a speed of 42kt (80km/h). The undercarriage design

using a tail wheel has also been designed to provide a high degree of stability after

a high-speed touchdown.

HIGH WESTERN CONTENT A worthy advantage backing this effort is the fact that the helicopter features

a wide range of components and systems manufactured by Western European

companies such as the Turbomeca Ardiden 3G engine, a fuel system supplied

by Aerazur of France and transmission (including the main and intermediate

gearboxes) developed and produced by Zoerkler of Austria. “The Ka-62 is an

entirely civil helicopter model and we have had a lot of freedom to select the best

systems available on the market while applying the price/performance selection

criteria. Of course, we would like to provide a sort of advantage to the Russian-

made systems, but the Ka-62 is being offered for export worldwide, and that is why

no compromises on quality are allowed. Our task is to bring to the market a high-

quality helicopter at a competitive price, with performance equal to that of the best

members of the medium class today”, Vagin explained.

Page 90: HeliOps Issue 102

90

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

The design team at Kamov utilised experience gained during the development

and testing of the military–standard Ka-60 Kasatka. This project was terminated in

2011, chiefly due to irresolvable problems with its Russian-made RD-600 engines,

which remained in prototype form only. The most important lesson learned

during the design and testing of the Ka-60 concerned the crashworthy fuselage

featuring improved structural integrity and an energy-absorbing undercarriage. It

is noteworthy that all these features were proved during the crash of the second

Kasatka prototype near Moscow on 23 June 2010. The helicopter was destroyed

by the impact forces but the two test pilots managed to survive without suffering

from any serious injury. The Ka-62 also features a bird strike-resistant windshield

and redundant main systems. The main and intermediate gearboxes feature

30-minute run-dry capabilities. The helicopter features a partially altered fuselage

layout optimised for safety. For example, the passenger cabin windows are made

larger than normal in order to be used as emergency pop-out exits. Around 60 per

cent of the fuselage (by weight) is made by polymeric composites. All the load-

carrying main structure members are manufactured from aluminium alloys and

titanium, while composites are used in all the non-critical areas of the fuselage. The

passenger cabin will be equipped with up to 15 crashworthy seats. Vagin claims that

the cabin volume of 9.5 m3 is unbeatable in its class.

Engine selection proved to be among the most important considerations,

in order to deliver fuel-efficient operations and low maintenance costs. All the

possible options were evaluated according to Vagin and in the end the Ardiden

3G, rated at 1,750 shp and featuring a dual-channel FADEC, was seen as the best

choice. It provides a one engine inoperable (OEI) capability at altitudes of up to

9,500ft (2,900m) in international standard atmosphere (ISA) conditions or 6,500ft

(2,000m) in ISA+20 conditions. A new-technology engine with 5,000 hours of time

between overhauls (TBO), the Ardiden 3G has good performance in hot-and-high

conditions.

SYSTEMS

Unlike its military predecessor Ka-60, the Ka-62 boasts an all-new main rotor

system with five composite blades, featuring a much-improved blade profile for

increased lift.

Maintainability was among the principal design considerations and the Ka-62

has a high level of built-in test functionality, health and usage monitoring system

(HUMS), quick access to main systems and controls as well as reduced maintenance

workload and increased use of line-replaceable units (LRU) for maximum aircraft

availability.

The Ka-62 will be optimised for operating in Russia’s extreme climatic conditions

temperature range and so is aimed to be certified for operating in temperatures

The Ka-62 is an entirely civil helicopter model and we have had a lot of freedom to select the best systems available on the market while applying the price/performance selection criteria.

Page 92: HeliOps Issue 102

92

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Located in North Brisbane, Australian Heliponents

is a new & dynamic business providing the most trusted and experienced

workmanship in component overhaul.

[email protected] +61402332309 I +61414738539www.heliponents.com.au

Rotor Drive Systems CR&OMechanical Flight Controls CR&O

Cargo Hook Repair & O/HNon-Destructive TestingBrush Cadmium Plating

between -50 to +45 0C. The systems and engines are designed to be capable of

operating without pre-start oil heating at temperatures as low as -35 0C. The design

allows for autonomous operations without hangar storage in wintertime and for use

at unpaved airfields and pads while requiring minimum maintenance.

The Ka-62 features an integrated avionics system supplied by the local company

Transas of St Petersburg, the KBO-62. It is designed for single-pilot VFR operations

for cargo transport missions, while for IFR and passenger/VIP transport, the Ka-62

will require a two-pilot crew.

MARKET PROSPECTS The Ka-62 is a commercial project, receiving developmental funding from several

streams. Russian Helicopters provides majority of the developmental funding,

and there is also additional finance by the Russian government through a federal

program that supports the civil aviation developments. It is targeted primarily

on the existing Mi-8T/P operators in Russia offering passenger/VIP transport to

country’s vast and still-booming oil & gas market. The new type is seen as a well-

suited option to replace at least partially, the bigger and fuel-thirsty Mi-8, especially

the older-generation Mi-8 versions that are powered by the TV2-117 turboshaft. The

Ka-62 has a broadly comparable passenger capability and payload, but offers much

higher passenger safety standards.

Page 93: HeliOps Issue 102

93

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Sergey Mikheev, Kamov’s long-serving designer general

commented that among the most rigorous requirements,

often outside the intention of the Western designs, is

that the Ka-62 shall be operated in Russia’s Far North

territories where outside temperatures are as low as

-50o C. The Ka-62, Mikheev believes, would be a worthy

successor of the long-retired Mil Mi-4, an unsung piston-

engined workhorse that created the Soviet helicopter

transport industry in the 1950s and 1960s.

The program is expected to have success in the

medium-to-far future chiefly thanks to the attention being

received from big government customers in Russia, such

as the ministries of defence, interior and emergency

situations; all of who operate significant fleets of worn-out

Mi-8s that will need replacement over the next decade.

The Ka-62 would be a prime candidate to fill a niche and as a result, a proportion

of the new helicopters to be bought by these ministries. There were already

announcements in 2014 that after receiving its Russian civil certification,

the Ka-62 is expected to be ordered by the Russian military for the utility transport

and passenger missions, and for operations from Russian Navy ships but in a

Located in North Brisbane, Australian Heliponents

is a new & dynamic business providing the most trusted and experienced

workmanship in component overhaul.

[email protected] +61402332309 I +61414738539www.heliponents.com.au

Rotor Drive Systems CR&OMechanical Flight Controls CR&O

Cargo Hook Repair & O/HNon-Destructive TestingBrush Cadmium Plating

Sergey Mikheev

Page 94: HeliOps Issue 102

maritime form including the installation of various missions suites and folding

rotors and tail boom.

At the beginning of the program, the Ka-62 attracted two export orders

from civilian customers, but their current status is unknown due to the significant

program delay. Seven units were ordered in December 2012 by Brazil’s Atlas

Taxi Aereo, which were originally slated for delivery between the first quarter of

2015 and first quarter of 2016. This contract also includes an option for another

seven machines. Colombian operator Vertical de Aviacion placed an order for

five Ka-62s in August 2013. HO

KA-62 – FACTS & FIGURES

Maximum take-off weight: 6,500kg (14,326lb)

Maximum load on external sling: 2,500kg (5,510lb)

Maximum useful load in the cabin: 2,000kg (4,400lb)

Size of the passenger cabin: - Height: 1.3m (4.2ft)- Length: 4.1m long (13.4ft)- Width: 1.75m (5.7ft)

Range with 15 passengers: 600km (324nm)

Cruise speed: 155kts (287km/h)

Maximum speed: 170kts (315km/h)

Range on a standard fuel tank: 405nm (750km)

Page 95: HeliOps Issue 102

95

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 96: HeliOps Issue 102
Page 97: HeliOps Issue 102

97

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

The Russian market of helicopters is on the verge of

big changes, due to recovering domestic production and

increasing interests by foreign investors in local production. EUGENE GERDEN provides an

update into the Russian recovery.

Page 98: HeliOps Issue 102

98

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

SEEDS OF RECOVERYThe Russian Ministry of Industry and

Trade, the state agency responsible

for the development of the Russian

helicopter industry, says that this year

will see the helicopter market there

actively recovering from the crisis of

2014-2015. The crisis was caused by

the introduction of Western sanctions

against Russia and the devaluation

of the national currency. According

to Denis Manturov, Russia’s Minister

of Industry and Trade, the growth

continues to be observed in both

military and civilian segments.

In the case of civilian helicopters, the

Russian government hopes rest with

the expansion of helicopter production

including work that was recently

commissioned by Bell Helicopters and

the potential launch of production by

other Western producers.

FOREIGNERS WELCOMEUnlike military helicopters, the

production of civilian helicopters has

never been a strong point for the

Russian helicopter industry however,

there is a possibility that the ongoing

expansion of global majors in the local

market will change such a situation in

the coming years.

As an example, Bell Helicopters

recently announced its plans to

significantly increase the volume

of supplies and production of its

helicopters in the Russian market during

the next several years. This will be

Denis Manturov, Russia’s Minister of Industry and Trade, who is responsible for the development of helicopters industry in the Russian government.

Page 99: HeliOps Issue 102

achieved by achieving the projected

capacity of its recently commissioned

production facility in Ekaterinburg.

Several weeks ago Bell officially started

the production of its helicopters in

Russia at Ural Works of Civil Aviation

plant, believing that the establishment

of local production capability will

allow it to start regular supplies of its

helicopters to Russian customers.

The project involves 100% local

production. Initial investments

amounted to RUB 2 billion rubles

(US$40 million). Production volumes

are not disclosed however, according

to some sources close to the project,

the plan is to be in the range of 100-

150 units per year. Among the major

customers of new Bell helicopters

in Russia are the Russian Ministry

of Internal Affairs, as well as private

business and local flying schools. Bell

Helicopters is not the only major that

hopes to gain a significant share in

the Russian helicopter market over the

coming years.

Similar plans have recently been

announced by AgustaWestland. The

company already produces its AW139s

at the HeliVert enterprise, (which is a

joint venture of Russian Helicopters and

AgustaWestland, located in the Tomilino

of the Moscow region.

Intended for the operations in the

Russian offshore market, the company

plans to launch the production of its

heavy-lift AW189 helicopter at the

same plant. The agreement on the

establishment of the venture was signed

between the governments of Russia and

Italy at the end of 2015, however, due to

the Western sanctions, implementation

of the project was suspended. Still, it

is planned that the project resume by

the end of the current year. The deal

is worth some EUR 1 billion and under

the terms of the deal, the partners will

produce up to 160 helicopters per year

and according to an AgustaWestland

spokesman, plans have the local

production reaching 90%-95% capacity

by 2025.

The expansion of AgustaWestland

and Bell in the promising Russian

Presentation of AW 139 model, produced at Helivert enteprise in the Tomilino.

Page 100: HeliOps Issue 102

100

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

market has not gone unnoticed by their

major rival, Airbus.

COMPLETING THE LISTAccording to an official spokesman

of Yevgeny Roizman, a mayor of

Yekaterinburg, Airbus has recently

signed a contract with the Ural Works

of Civil Aviation (same company that

is working with Bell) on licensing

production of the H135 helicopter in

Ekaterinburg. It is reported that, in

addition to the helicopters’ production,

the contract involves cooperation with

Turbomeca for the production of Arrius

B2BPlus engines for the H135, including

repairing powertrains. According to the

partners’ plans, the production volume

this year is expected to reach 20-30

units; comparable to the production of

Bell-407GXP.

Vadim Badejo, General Director

of Ural Works of Civil Aviation, said

that the volume of investments in the

project at the initial stage will exceed

US$10 million with a possibility of

further significant increases during the

next several years.

To date, only 11 H135s have seen

commercial service in Russia, however

local Russian production will allow

significantly increased the availability

of their to the Russian market during

the next several years. It is reported

that the new helicopters will be mainly

supplied for the needs of Russian air

ambulance.

In addition to production, Airbus

Helicopters has also plans to increase

imports of its helicopters to the

Russian market.

Several months ago the company

received authorization to conduct sales

of its EC175 into the Russian market

and is expected to receive similar

permission for the sales of its ‘heavy’

EC225 soon. According to the company,

the demand for its new helicopters in

Russia is great and there is a possibility

of signing new contracts during the

MAKS air show this year.

Interest in the EC175 has already

Yevgeny Roizman, a mayor of Yekaterinburg and a person, which personally controls implementation of projects for the building of Airbus and Bell helicopters in Ekaterinburg.

Page 101: HeliOps Issue 102

101

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Waypoint is the world’s largest independent

helicopter leasing company, with leasing

expertise in more than 20 countries, and a fleet of

more than 100 aircraft on lease, coupled with a

large selection of multi-year forward deliveries,

representing a combined value of $3 billion.

Waypoint forges lasting relationships with leading

helicopter operators worldwide, who value the

integrity, experience and long-term commitment

of Waypoint’s leadership team and financial

sponsors. As former helicopter operators, we

understand the difficult fleet management and

market challenges operators face and structure

flexible leasing solutions to solve them.

We put operators first — always.

Flexible. Independent. Long-term.The Waypoint Advantage

Copy

right

© 2

015

Way

poin

t Lea

sing

Ser

vice

s LLC

. All

right

s res

erve

d.

w a y p o i n t l e a s i n g . c om

Page 102: HeliOps Issue 102

102

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

been expressed by some Russian

state corporations and businessman,

who plan to use it mostly for private

needs. Airbus plans for the EC 225 are

expected to address for the needs of

local oil and gas companies, looking for

offshore development.

According to Artem Fetisov,

commercial director of Airbus

Helicopters Vostok, a Russian subsidiary

of Airbus Helicopters, the company

has big hopes for the Russian market

over the next several years. As well

as being involved in local production,

the company hopes to continue selling

more helicopters to its Russian partners.

Currently Airbus Helicopters already has

a contract with Utair, one of Russia’s

leading airlines, involving the supply of

15 EC175s with an option for the sale of

15 more units.

The company hopes to expand its

Russian sales expecting to sign new

contracts with the Russian customers

during the forthcoming Russian aviation

expositions, probably the biggest of

which will be the MAKS 2016. MAKS is

an annual International Air Show, held in

the city of Zhukovskiy (Moscow region)

during August, 25-30.

Operating in the Russian market

for several years now, Robinson has

announced plans to increase sales of

its light helicopters into the country.

The company’s biggest hopes are on its

R66 model, which remains extremely

popular in Russia with ever increasing

sales. Although Robinson remains one

of the leading suppliers of helicopters

to the Russian market, it’s market share

is under pressure. In 2009, the company

had 69% of the imports whereas in 2015

the company it had 59%.

The ever growing expansion of

overseas majors has already resulted

in about 700 units presently in the

fleet, which is almost by 2.5 times

more than in 2009; and demand

continues to grow.

At the same time, according to

analysts of the Russian Ministry of

Transport, the biggest demand in the

Russian civil market is in the medium

helicopter, which is contrary to previous

Robinson R44, one of the most demanded helicopter models among the top-managers of Russian state corporations and companies in the sky of Russia’s St. Petersburg.

Page 103: HeliOps Issue 102

103

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

D E L I V E R I N G G L O B A L C O V E R A G E O F T H E H E L I C O P T E R I N D U S T R Y

The HeliOps 2015 Global HEMS poster is a “Must Have” for everyone involved in or who has an interest in the worldwide Helicopter EMS industry. Looks great on your office, the ops room, at home or as a gift for a friend.

ARHT (New Zealand)

ProMedica Air (USA)

999 Beijing (China)

Kuban Avia (Russia)

Midlands Air Ambulance (UK)

Hawaii Life Flight (USA)

ADAC (Germany)

Dorset & Somerset Air Ambulance (UK)

Bayflite (USA) AEROCARE

(USA)

Airlift Northwest (USA)

SkyHealth (USA)

CareFlight Sydney (Australia)

MedFlight Ohio (USA)

UT Lifestar (USA)

CALSTAR (USA)

MONOC 1 (USA)

Ochsner Flight Care (USA)

LVHN MedEvac (USA)

Air Evac Lifeteam (USA)

Mercy Flight (USA)

Air George (USA)

MedForce 2 (USA)

OSAKIDETZA Bilbao (Spain)

REACT (USA)

Alpine Air Ambulance (Switzerland)

Air Zermatt (Switzerland)

Haynes Life Flight (USA)

Okavango Air Rescue (Botswana)

Scandinavian Air Ambulance (Sweden)

Mercy Flight Western NY (USA)

SAMU (France)

NorthWest MedStar (USA)

Saudi Red Crescent (Saudi Arabia)

PennSTAR (USA)

Haiti Air Ambulance (Haiti)

ShandsCair (USA)

Life Air Rescue (USA)

Trauma One (USA)

Kuwait Air Ambulance (Kuwait)

San Antonio Air Life (USA)

Careflite (USA)

North Colorado Med Evac (USA)

Wiltshire Air Ambulance (UK)

MAC Rescue (Australia)

AIRCARE 5 (USA)

AirBear (USA)

DRF (Germany)

Boston Med Flight (USA)

STAT MedEvac (USA)

Lotnicze Pogotowie Ratunkowe (Poland)

Flight For Life (USA)

EMERCOM (Russia)

Kazakhstan Air Medical

(Kazakhstan)

Acadian Air Med (USA)

Nightingale Regional Air (USA)

Memorial Medflight (USA)

Tampa General Aeromed (USA)

Sky Bear (USA)

Memorial Hermann Life Flight (USA)

Life Flight (USA)

Miami Valley Careflight (USA)

Lufttransport (Norway)

Saudi EMS (Saudi Arabia)

Children’s Health (USA)

ORNGE (Canada)

Lifeflight (Qatar)

NSW Air Ambulance (Australia)

Queensland Govt Air Rescue (Australia)

AirGreen Torino (Italy)

Abu Dhabi Police (UAE)

Ambulance Victoria (Australia)

Govt Flying Service (Hong Kong)

REGA (Switzerland)

TriState CareFlight (USA)

Dubai Police (UAE)

STARS (Canada)

AirMed of Utah (USA)

SESCAM (Spain)

Nationwide Children’s Monarch 1 (USA)

Baptist Health MedFlight (USA)

GTA-PE (Brasil)

Martin 2 (Austria)

Essex Herts Air Ambulance (UK)

London’s Air Ambulance (UK)

Helimed 76 (Scotland)

Kent, Surrey & Sussex Air Ambulance (UK)

Staff for Life (USA)

Angel One (USA)

St Mary’s Life Flight (USA)

LifeFlight Eagle (USA)

Duke Life Flight (USA)

AIR LINK (USA)

Eastern Cape EMS (South Africa)

Illustrations by Ugo CrisponiAviationgraphic.com

www.heliopsmag.com

Measuring 96.5cm wide by 70cm deep the poster is printed on 200 gsm satin stock and features 92 immaculate illustrations showcasing HEMS programs around the world by master illustrator Ugo Crisponi.

This is a limited edition print run so order yours today, and order some for your friends and colleagues – the perfect gift.

Page 104: HeliOps Issue 102

104

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

years when the majority of sales were

light helicopters.

RUSSIAN PRODUCTIONIn addition to global majors,

Helicopters of Russia (Russia’s state-

owned company) has announced plans

to increase the production of Russian

helicopters. According to recent

statements of Alexander Mikheyev,

head of the company, this year the

volume of production should reach

200 helicopters.

This is however, significantly

lower the earlier announced figures

of production up to 300 units per

year. According to the initial plans of

the company, the annual growth of

production should have been in the

range of 10%-12%, however the current

economic stagnation in Russia and the

devaluation of the national currency,

will prevent the rapid implementation

of these plans.

Igor Czeczikov, deputy general

director of the company says that

hopes are put on Mi-38 and The Kamov

Ka-226 (Ka-226T), which enjoy great

demand among the foreign customers

of the company.

Meanwhile, the company will

participate in the filling a state defense

order that involves the replacement of

the entire fleet of military helicopters of

the Russian Air Forces by 2020.

Last year the volume of supplies of

military helicopters for the needs of the

Russian army amounted to 90 models,

while among the most demanded

models in the Russian air forces were

the Ka-52 “Alligator”, the Mi-28N “Night

Hunter”, Mi-8AMTSh (MTV-5-1), Mi-35M,

Mi-26T2, Ka-226, “Ansat-U” as well as

some others.

Although the current range

of company helicopters is mostly

Alexander Mikheyev, CEO of Helicopters of Russia.

Ka-52 Alligator, one of the most demanded helicopters in the

Russian Air Forces.

Sergey Chemezov, head of Rostec corporation and Helicopters of Russia discusses the current situation in Russian helicopters industry with Russia’s President.

Page 105: HeliOps Issue 102

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

Pro Pilot Ad_01.27.16.pdf 1 1/28/2016 6:51:04 PM

Page 106: HeliOps Issue 102

106

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

comprised of military models, according

to state plans, there is a significant

expansion and diversification planned

for the next several years. The plans are

expected to be achieved through the

attraction of strategic foreign investors

to acquire key stakes in the company.

This will also allow the allocation

of additional funds to the domestic

helicopter industry.

According to Sergei Chemezov, head

of Rostec, (Russia’s state corporation

and the largest holders of state assets

in the field of military and defence)

Russia’s Mi-38 helicopter, which is considered as one of the most promising for exports by the Russian government.

Russia’s President Putin inspects Rostov Helicopter Plant, one of Russia’s largest producers

of helicopters, which is part of Helicopters of Russia.

Page 107: HeliOps Issue 102

107

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and Mateo Renzi, prime-minister of Italy during signing of an agreement of establishment of production of AugustaWestland helicopters in Russia.

Mi-35M, one of the major military helicopters in Russia.

Mi-26T2

Page 108: HeliOps Issue 102

108

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

and the parent company of Helicopters

of Russia, to date, several Western

companies have expressed their

interest in the acquisition of the stake in

Helicopters of Russia.

He said, “There are several foreign

companies, which have already

expressed an interest in the acquisition

of a stake in the company. To date, we

have already started negotiations with

potential buyers. It is planned that at

the initial stage we will sell no more

than 25% in the company and there is

a possibility of selling additional stake

during the next several years.”

The potential bidders for Helicopters

of Russia have not been disclosed,

however, according to some sources

close to Rostec, among them are

expected to be some leading Western

holdings such as Finmeccanica, Airbus

and others. Representatives of the

companies declined to comment and

the amount of the deal is not disclosed,

however, according to estimates of

analysts of the Russian Ministry of

Defense, it may be in the range of

US$400-500 million.

It is hoped that the deal may be

closed by fall of 2016.

In addition to Helicopters of

Russia, Concern of Radio-Electronic

Technologies (KRET), one of Russia’s

largest enterprises in the field of radio-

electronics for the helicopters’ industry,

may also become a subject

of privatization.

WRAP UPThe Russian helicopter industry

has big potential for further growth,

which is reflected by the ever-growing

interest of foreign majors to invest

in local production, as well as the

expansion of production by local

producers. Much will depend however,

on the lifting of Western trade sanctions

from the country. This is expected

to occur by the end of the year.

According to Russian Ministry of

Industry and Trade analysis, domestic

production will continue to focus on

the building of military helicopters due

to the ongoing militarization of the

country. At the same time development

of the industry will be complicated by

the lack of competition in the market

(due to the domination of the state

monopoly) and the sanctions that had

closed Russian helicopters industry

access to some modern Western

technologies. HO

Inside Ural Works of Civil Aviation Plant.

Page 109: HeliOps Issue 102

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

The HeliOps 100th Issue Anniversary Poster is a must have collectable for anyone who is involved in the helicopter industry – civil or military. Its a collection of some amazing paint schemes of some operators we have worked with over the years. There is a limited print run on our 100th Anniversary Issue Poster so grab yours while you can. They make a great addition to your office, hangar, home or as a gift for friends and colleagues.

Page 110: HeliOps Issue 102
Page 111: HeliOps Issue 102

111

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 112: HeliOps Issue 102

I have flown the greater majority of

my career in the knowledge that

should I be involved in an accident or

incident the ensuing safety investigation

will be conducted with the intent not

to apportion blame, but to find the

causes in the interests preventing

future occurrences. This is not to say

that should negligence be a factor

that there will not be fair, reasonable,

and just consequences. However any

punitive response to negligent or

intentionally unprofessional behavior

would be subject to a separate line

of investigation or enquiry. This is

to say, the safety investigation and

its subsequent report, would not

be discoverable as evidence in an

administrative disciplinary investigation

or hearing. It is on this basis that we

may give freely and willingly to safety

investigations, and we are not read into

evidence when being interviewed by a

safety officers or safety representatives.

I would offer that is the very freedom

of maneuver of the safety investigator,

and the comfort and assurance that an

aviator or engineer may give freely of

their experience, and admit fulsomely to

their mistakes, that is the power of the

Accident/Incident Safety Investigation

– it is the cornerstone of our Aviation

Safety Management System (SMS).

Perhaps in essence here we are

really expressing the fundamentals

of trust, that is the trust that our

Safety Management System exist for

that which the name intends – safety.

Where error or unintentional violation

has occurred, we mentor, educate and

Page 113: HeliOps Issue 102

HELIOPSFRONTLINE 17

Page 114: HeliOps Issue 102

114

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

pilot, although seriously injured,

survived. This resulted in a landmark

case in the UK, Rogers vs Hoyle. The Air

Accident Investigations Branch (AAIB)

of the UK’s Department of Transport

investigated the accident and published

its report openly on 14 April 2012. The

report noted that the aircraft ‘was seen

by observers to pull up into a loop

and during the maneuver it ended in a

spin from which it did not recover. The

maneuver started at 1500 feet AGL and

there was insufficient height for the

pilot to recover from the subsequent

spin.’ The Roger’s family, whose son

was lost in the accident, claimed in

the High Court that they wish to rely

on the facts and evidence presented

in the AAIB report. Hoyle’s insurers

disagreed, however the Rogers family

won an appeal in the High Court in

correct; where willful negligence has

occurred fair and just consequences

must be applied. I offer this is what

the reasonable man or woman would

expect, in that expectation is for all

intents and purposes the basis of

the Western legal system. A recent

Court of Appeals finding in the United

Kingdom (UK) has allowed the release

of an Accident Investigation Report for

consideration as evidence in a court

of law for the purpose of apportioning

blame and potentially remedy.

SO IS THERE A CHANGE IN THE WIND?

On 15 May 2011, a Royal Marines

Captain was a passenger in a Tiger

Moth aircraft on a joy flight. Regrettably

the flight ended in tragedy and the

young Captain lost his life while the

Page 115: HeliOps Issue 102

115

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Relevant to whether as an industry the decision warrants reflection, is discussing whether there is a trend for an increase in the findings of criminalization in aviation incidents and accidents.

Page 116: HeliOps Issue 102

116

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

enquiry under the judiciary laws and

guidance for evidence collection,

thus the AAIB did not fit the bill. The

court of Appeals decision has set an

alternative precedent. Kavanagh and

Waters (2014) highlighted in their

analysis of the potential impacts of the

decision that ‘…participants in future

investigations may be less forthcoming

with relevant evidence if they believe

that such evidence may be used in

civil proceedings. This in turn would

potentially result in the AAIB having

to perform its functions without full

disclosure of relevant information.’2

The ramifications of such analysis

becoming reflective of actual behavioral

easily interpolated; an AAIB report

may be used to apportion blame

and no longer would be singularly

about identifying causal factors and

preventing future incidents.

STATE OBLIGATIONSThe UKs’ AAIB is charged with

the State’s obligations to investigate

air accidents as set out in Annex 13

of the Convention on International

Civil Aviation 1944 (the Chicago

Convention), EC Council Directive

94/56/EC of 21 November 1994, and

more latterly EC Regulation 996/2010

(the EU regulation). The ICAO

Annex 13 represents an international

treaty of all UN member countries,

which establishes the purpose of

investigations and protects those

safety investigations for learning and

system improvements only. Notably, the

2013. Hoyle’s insurers took the matter

to the Court of Appeals, and both the

UK’s Department of Transport and

the International Airline Transport

Association (IATA) backed the insurers

efforts to find against the Rogers family.

Despite these mighty organizations

stacked against them, the Rogers

family prevailed and the AAIB report

was deemed admissible. Lord Justice

Christopher Clark of Court of Appeals

stated in his judgment ‘I agree with the

judge (Justice Leggatt) when he said

that a non-lawyer would be astonished

that the report of the AAIB was not

something to which a court would even

have regard”, further he said, “their use

considerably assists the efficient and

speedy resolution of claims; and the

majority of potential civil claims arising

from civil aviation accidents settle on

the basis of AAIB reports…’. 1

To a non-aviator Lord Justice

Clark’s decision most likely makes

common sense. However it was

indeed a landmark decision in that it

set in motion precedent that has the

potential to erode the very structural

sinews of the trust embedded in our

SMS. While AAIB reports, and similar

aviation accident investigation reports

of other nations, have often played a

part in litigation, that part has typically

been limited to providing direction

or targets of litigation, ultimately

informing the court as a background

body of knowledge vice admissible

evidence. Evidence to support the

court must be collected by expert

1. Stewarts Law, 2014, ‘Rogers v Hoyle: legal victory for claimants in UK aviation claims’, 13 Mar 2014, <http://www.stewartslaw.com/rogers-v-hoyle-legal-victory-for-claimants-in-uk-aviation-claims.aspx

2. Kavanagh G. and Waters M, 2014, ‘Landmark English Court of Appeals Decision Upholds Admissibility of Accident Investigation Reports in Civil Proceedings’, <http://www.hfw.com/downloads/HFW-Landmark-English-Court-of-Appeal-decision-accident-investigation-reports-March-2014.pdf>, accessed 24 Apr 16.

Page 117: HeliOps Issue 102
Page 118: HeliOps Issue 102

118

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

adjoining of safety investigations with

criminal prosecutions is something that

Annex 13 explicitly guards against, and

ICAO member states are in principle

obliged to enact its standards through

their own legal systems. In the case

of Rogers vs Hoyle, the decision by

the Court of Appeals appears to have

challenged this obligation, whether

intentionally or unintentionally.

Important also in the discussion

is the manner in which an accident

investigation is conducted. In the

case of the UK, and not dissimilar

to other Western countries and all

countries who are signatories to the

ICAO convention, it discharges its

statutory obligations by conducting

investigations in such a manner that the

AAIB dictates and sees fit, outwardly

only constrained by budgetary and

logistical limitations. Furthermore, the

AAIB will choose which accidents and

incidents it investigates, how and who

is investigated, what is considered

and what is not. The AAIB is the sole

decision maker in what goes in the

report and what does not. The AAIB will

as a matter of course afford interested

parties to comment on a draft report,

however beyond this process and

internal review, none of the checks and

balances of litigation are employed.

Finally, much of the underlying evidence

collected during the investigation

remains confidential (Regulation 18

of the UK Regulations), resulting in a

difficulty, if not impossibility, of giving

full weighting and analysis to the report

and its findings by a judiciary authority.

Importantly, as a matter of

precedent, the UK decision may have

Page 119: HeliOps Issue 102

different applications in the various

countries around the world. For

example in Canada, Pankratz (2014)

offers that ‘the law concerning the

admissibility of these reports is stricter

in Canada’ and that ‘under the Canadian

Transportation Accident Investigation

and Safety Board Act, an investigator is

not ordinarily considered competent or

compellable to appear as a witness in

any legal proceedings’ and that ‘…their

opinion is not admissible in evidence’.3

Albeit that individual countries will

have nuances on the application of

their own transport safety laws, if they

are signatory to ICAO, then the Rogers

vs Hoyle case is indeed landmark. It

does remain to be seen whether this

precedent will be supported by other

courts around the world, however

one can expect that at the very least,

particularly where there has been loss

of life and a strong will for litigation

exists, then the conversation of the

applicability of this case will be had.

CRIMINALIZATIONRelevant to whether as an industry

the decision warrants reflection, is

discussing whether there is a trend

for an increase in the findings of

criminalization in aviation incidents and

accidents. Dekker (2010) offers that

this is indeed the case. He presents

and argues a steadily increasing

trend of the criminalization of pilots,

mechanics and air traffic controllers in

aviation accidents between 1950 and

2009. Michaelides-Mateou & Mateou

(2010) indicate that of 54 cases over

this period, almost half occurred in

the 2000-2009 period.4 Although the

Combined, an increasing penchant for litigation, the lowering of the barrier of accessibility to the accident investigation reports for consideration by a court, coupled with a low tolerance for accidents and a steadily reducing tolerance for the acceptance of risk, it perhaps does build a case to support a hypothesis that the criminalization of accidents and incidents has increased, and the landmark decision by the UK Court of Appeals to allow the use of accident investigation reports lowers the barriers for an increasing trend.

3. Pankratz D, 2014, ‘UK Accident Investigation Reports Admissible in Legal Proceedings — What about Canada?’, 31 May 2014, <http://aviationlawblog.ahbl.ca/2014/05/31/uk-accident-investigation-reports-admissible-in-legal-proceedings-what-about-canada/>, accessed 24 April 2016

4. Michaelides-Mateou S & Mateou A, 2010, Flying in the Face of Criminalisation, Farnham, UK, Ashgate Publishing Co. The figure of 54 was estimated from a graph presented.

Page 120: HeliOps Issue 102

work presented was not normalized

against a highly significant increase in

flying rate over this period, the trend

is nonetheless compelling. He further

noted this trend or desire for seeking

criminal consideration of people in

major safety incidents mirrors similar

developments in other fields such

as shipping, construction, chemical

processing and health care.5

Alongside this premise of an

increasing trend to seek blame and

accountability for accidents in a legal

sense, there is an apparent tendency

at the social level for accidents, and

the apportioning of blame, to be

interpreted through the lens of a

society that has become overly risk

conscious. This is to say that we have

come to see an accident through the

failure of risk management at some

level, and in turn this implies the failure

of someone to manage risk. As aircraft

and other means of transport become

ever more reliable, the tendency of

the community is to have a fairly low

threshold for the acceptance of risk.

This is not an altogether bad thing,

for one may argue that it is this very

threshold that assists us in continuing

to strive for excellence and perfection

in our machines and in the preparation

of those who maintain and fly them. Put

another way, the success of aviation as

having become a highly reliable form

of transport may well have indeed

sponsored a societal belief that it is

failsafe. Indeed at the higher aviation

system level it is designed as a safe

fail system i.e. designed to have a low

likelihood of failure, but if it does it is

graceful in degradation, recognizable

and controllable by the human.

Combined, an increasing penchant

for litigation, the lowering of the

barrier of accessibility to the accident

investigation reports for consideration

by a court, coupled with a low tolerance

for accidents and a steadily reducing

tolerance for the acceptance of risk, it

perhaps does build a case to support

a hypothesis that the criminalization of

accidents and incidents has increased,

and the landmark decision by the UK

Court of Appeals to allow the use of

accident investigation reports lowers

the barriers for an increasing trend.

It remains to be seen how important

the Rogers vs Hoyle case will be to

our industry. Furthermore it remains

to be seen whether there will be a

legislative response to tighten the

application of the intent of the ICAO

provisions in Chapter 13. It similarly a

questions as to whether the various

aviation investigative bodies around

the world may reconsider their current

investigative process and the provision

of information for investigations

with the objective to maintain the

singular intent of aviation accident

investigating reports to prevent

accidents. As the AAIB states on

their website, their purpose ‘is not to

apportion blame or liability”.6

I strongly believe that the Aviation SMS

is the crown jewel of our industry. It is

why our military can rely on the weapon

system to be there day-in and day-out,

should it be lost it should not be due to

poor safety, rather due to enemy action. It

is the reasons passengers by the millions

travel weekly on airliners around the

world and why Doctors and nurses will

entrust their patients to air lift. Our role

as aviators, engineers and maintainers is

to stay true to the Safety Management

System, be safety practitioners and seek

always a just culture that is in harmony

with our mission.

Best we keep an eye on the legal

beagles while we do all this!! HO

5. Dekker S, ‘Pilots, Controllers and Mechanics on Trial: Cases, Concerns and Countermeasures’, International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, Vol 10, No 1, FAA Academy, Oklahoma City, 2010.

6. AAIB Website, <Our purpose is to improve aviation safety globally by determining the causes of air accidents and serious incidents, and making safety recommendations intended to prevent recurrence. It is not to apportion blame or liability>, accessed 24 April 2016

Page 121: HeliOps Issue 102

121

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

Page 122: HeliOps Issue 102
Page 123: HeliOps Issue 102

123

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

‘JUST CULTURE’ IS JUST

GOOD BUSINESSIn ‘getting it right’ with safety, one of the important aspects of any organization is its culture. An experienced EMS operator, MIKE BIASATTI delves into what a ‘just culture’ means and

how it can be applied to the EMS fraternity.

Page 124: HeliOps Issue 102

124

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGESThe helicopter air ambulance industry in the United States has undergone

many transformative changes over the last several years and its record growth

is challenging the maintenance of proper oversight and management of assets,

attitudes and safety. Safety and Culture are two simple words, but in the context of

the Helicopter Air Ambulance (HAA) industry, you would be hard pressed to find two

other words that receive as much attention among company leadership and crews.

With so many bases spread across so many states and in some instances in foreign

countries (Air Methods staffs a base in Haiti as of the first quarter of 2014), some form

of standardization was needed to develop and refine a safety program that had the

support within each organization from the CEO on down.

OWNING UPIn his book ‘Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents’, James Reason writes

“On the face of it, persuading people to file critical incident and near-miss reports is

not an easy task, particularly when it may entail divulging their own errors. Human

reactions to making mistakes take various forms, but frank confession does not

usually come high on the list.”

Ownership of actions plays an instrumental role in safety. What is needed is an

organization that embraces “just culture”; an environment of accountability in which

people are encouraged to provide essential safety-related information, especially

if the subject of the unsafe event involved the person reporting. No crewmember,

no matter how diligent is above making a mistake and accepting that reality is a

necessary first step in resisting complacency in this very dynamic work environment.

The thought process with ‘just culture’ is to accept that we all can miss something

or make an honest mistake and the number of those events that do not lead to a

Page 125: HeliOps Issue 102
Page 126: HeliOps Issue 102

126

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Now this general presumption does not

in any way make it fact.

Imagine for example, at some

hypothetical shift change the oncoming

pilot is setting up the cockpit for his shift

when a standby flight request comes in.

He’s already in the pilot’s seat arranging

things, so he stays seated and continues

as the medical crew approaches the

aircraft. A brief discussion ensues and

after a few minutes the standby request

becomes a launch request and the

aircraft is started, the APU stowed, the

medical crew climbs in and the aircraft

departs to the referring hospital. Simple,

right? In more than a decade, they’ve

done this a thousand times. This is no

rookie crew either, with an air medical

experience averaging 13 years. Fast

forward 30 minutes and the aircraft

lands at the referring hospital only to

reportable incident or worse a lost time

accident, are considerably higher and

offer a unique opportunity to identify

the elements which lead to particular

negative outcomes. Just Culture doesn’t

protect against behaviour or actions that

are intentional, reckless or made wilfully

against company policy

Generally speaking, once a person

acquires the requisite level of experience

to ply their trade around a medical

helicopter, the general presumption

is that they’ve matured to the point

beyond arrogance and an attitude of

invulnerability. They can recognize

in themselves that on any given day

under some varying circumstance

that person can fall prey to

complacency, inattention, distraction,

fatigue or any of a number of other

hazardous attitudes or circumstances.

Page 127: HeliOps Issue 102

127

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 128: HeliOps Issue 102

128

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

have a maintenance worker approach

the aircraft and advise the crew that

something was hanging from the

helicopter as they approached. This

made contact with some power lines as

the helicopter descended to the helipad.

It turns out that the power cord, the

electrical cord that plugs into the aircraft

to charge the rechargeable medical

equipment had not been removed and

as the helicopter departed the base, the

end attached to the power outlet gave

way leaving the other end still plugged

in to the aircraft.

SO WHAT ARE POSSIBLE OUTCOMES OF THIS OVERSIGHT?

How is it possible that three-

experienced crewmembers, presumably

rested, just arriving for their shift missed

a cord attached to the aircraft? In

this particular helicopter there is no

‘caution light’ warning the pilot of an

open door. So, what is your first instinct

in this incident?

For this example let’s remove the

maintenance worker who brought the

cord to your attention and substitute

one of your crew – say your nurse was

the first one out of the aircraft, saw

the cord and immediately bringing it

to your attention. No one else is aware

of the occurrence, it’s night-time and

the helipad is behind the hospital and

essentially empty.

The next question is, do you think

this could happen to other crews?

After all, there are far less experienced

crews who’ve been flying together far

less time than you and your team. Your

first thought might be to not report

the event, after all, what would the

management do? Or how would it make

you look to the others? Would you

swear one another to secrecy even if this

leaves other crews to peril should

Page 129: HeliOps Issue 102

129

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

they overlook something attached to

their aircraft. Keeping it secret also

denies the organization an opportunity

to potentially fix what may be a very

fixable problem.

Could the outcome have been

far worse? Let’s remove the realm of

possibility for a second that the cord

could have blown off and wrapped

around the tail rotor or fallen at some

point in flight and caused an accident/

injury to persons on the ground.

Perhaps this aircraft was landing on one

of the crowded highways, commute

traffic stopped in both directions, EMS

on scene, the news helicopter circling

overhead, camera crews on the side

service roads during daylight hours and

here you come on short final, wondering

to yourself why everyone, in addition

Page 130: HeliOps Issue 102

130

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

to staring at your approach is pointing

toward the helicopter.

With a ‘Just Culture’ embedded in

the organization, the crew could report

the event without fear of punitive action.

Certainly there are lessons to be learned

and perhaps changes made to help

ensure this type of thing never happens

again. It could also be indicative of a

far larger issue, a symptom so to speak.

With an encouragement to report, even

your mistakes, everyone could benefit.

BUTTERFLY EFFECTReturn to the example where only

you and your crew are aware of what’s

happened. Under the ‘Just Culture’

environment there are protections for

the crew and vast benefits to be gained

for reporting the incident.

For example, in the long term

the aircraft manufacturer could be

petitioned to add a light to the console

indicating that the ground power door

receptacle is not closed. In the interim

or in the event the manufacturer opted

not to make that change, the your

company might decide for a secondary

visual warning to be added (a laminated

sign on the seat warning ‘power cord

attached’ or a brightly covered sock

over the cyclic only to be removed after

the round power cord was removed)

and perhaps a pig-tail cord (a short

electrical cord of 12”) be placed between

the aircraft’s plug input and the much

longer extension cord coming from

the ground power source so that if this

unlikely event were to happen again, the

length of the item extending from the

aircraft would pose far less danger. Or

the response could be any combination

of the above.

With the fear of punitive action

removed, the crew feel safer to ‘fall

on their collective sword’, report what

Page 131: HeliOps Issue 102
Page 132: HeliOps Issue 102

132

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

happened and participate in the process

of engineering out the elements that

allowed their momentary inattention

to escalate to the point of possible

damage or injury. With the attention

brought forth from the report of the

crew, awareness can be raised, changes

made, an accident avoided and safety

promoted.

IT’ ALL ABOUT LEARNINGA ‘Just Culture’ supports and

encourages learning from unsafe acts.

Failures and incidents are considered

by organizations with a good safety

culture as lessons which can be used to

avoid more serious events. It helps to

ensure that all events are reported and

investigated to discover the root causes,

and that timely feedback is given on the

findings and remedial actions, both to

the work groups involved and to others

in the organization or industry who

might experience the same problem.

This horizontal communication is

particularly important.1

Through the collection and

organization of this data, policies and

training can be developed to promote

safety, reduce risk and enhance overall

efficiencies. I have often briefed my

crews with the cautionary advisory to

watch out for the pilot, nurse, medic

or mechanic who boasts, “that would

never happen to me”, when referencing

an aircraft accident or incident. That

person’s arrogance opens them up to a

greater likelihood of being involved in a

serious mishap.

ASSESSING RISKOpen reporting of events, whether

minor or major, permits the organization

to proactively assess risk which is

a necessary and effective means of

improving safety. A vital element in

assessing risk is examining likelihood

and history can be a very valuable

indicator of likelihood. Without the

reporting of those times where we

1. GAIN Working Group E 5

Page 133: HeliOps Issue 102
Page 134: HeliOps Issue 102

134

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

either got close or just screwed up,

that likelihood dimension of risk could

essentially be false.

The applications of implementing

a ‘Just Culture’ are broad and have

many air medical operations. Imagine

two similarly labelled medicines kept

in close proximity of one another, but

with completely different effects on

the patient. Imagine an instance during

a critical transport and in the stress

of the moment the nurse grabs and

draws up the wrong medicine, and as

he prepares to administer what would

be a fatal dose of medicine X, the medic

catches the error before the medicine

is administered and avoids what could

have been a fatal mistake. What’s the

first instinct of the crew?

Without fear of punitive action in

a ‘Just Culture’ the crew can report

the near error, and as a result perhaps

labelling is changed, color coded, bottle

size or shape is made unique to one

versus the other, or perhaps assignment

of those drugs placement is revisited

and changed. Often once a change

like this is implemented others come

forward having had the same or similar

experiences, but for fear of negative

consequences, hadn’t reported it.

A ‘Just Culture’ is one that supports

learning from unintentional unsafe acts

in order to improve the level of safety

awareness, allow data collection and

establish procedures to help engineer

HAA crews can through the improved

recognition of ‘safety events’ that might

otherwise go unreported create a

statistical record,

In his book ‘Just Culture: Balancing

Safety and Accountability’, Sidney

Dekker notes, “The conclusion drawn

from most incidents and accidents

Page 135: HeliOps Issue 102

135

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

in aviation is that everybody and

everything contributes in a small way

and that these small events

and contributions can combine to

create unfortunate and unintended

outcomes”.

Within the context of aviation, patient

care, aircraft maintenance and corporate

leadership safety is the state in which

the possibility of harm to persons or

of property damage is reduced to, and

maintained at or below, an acceptable

level through a continuing process of

hazard identification and safety risk

management2; a Just Culture is an

important part of the making all facets

of air medical operations their safest.

Every shift, every flight, every patient is

an opportunity to embrace, promote and

improve safety. HO

2. http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/644.pdf

Page 136: HeliOps Issue 102

STORY BY MORNE WI ID

PART TWO

Page 137: HeliOps Issue 102

137

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 138: HeliOps Issue 102

138

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

We previously examined the different backgrounds and career paths that

Airline and Helicopter pilots follow to end up in a multi-crew, multi-

engine and highly automated and sophisticated machines. Sometimes the

helicopter operations happen in very challenging and hostile environments, especially

when looking at some of the remote offshore installations serviced by helicopters

around the world in all weather conditions.

This background information provided the reader with a degree of appreciation of

the competency and experience gaps that exist between these 2 set of crews when

looking at IFR knowledge and skills. It was further discussed that helicopter pilots

have a unique culture and positive feedback was received that further validated this

point of view.

Regardless of what we label this culture (Bush, Chopper, Cowboy, etc.) that was

introduced in the last part, it is evident in several incidents and recent accidents can

be attributed to pilots’ misunderstanding of the effective use of automation and the

ability to use effective Threat and Error Management strategies to actively monitor

the flight path. More importantly, how to restore the system when the helicopter has

ended up in an undesired or unsafe flight condition.

The next part to be published will review a S92 incident offshore from St John’s on

23 July 2011 and the AS332L2 accident into Sumburgh Airport on 23 August 2013 to

develop and understanding how various cultural and operational issues (threats) can

impact on the performance of crews and how poorly structured SOPs lead to error(s)

being committed, resulting in an Undesired Helicopter State (UHS). When crews are

faced with the dynamics of an UHS, there is still an opportunity to manage these

errors and restoring the system to normal, making the event(s) inconsequential.

Failure to do so, will ultimately lead to an incident or accident as it will be

illustrated through the case studies.

Due to the extent of this problem in the Offshore Helicopter Industry at the

moment, the last part will look at specific Non-Technical Skills for Helicopter crews

and Tailored Crew Resource and Threat and Error Management Training for crews.

INTRODUCTIONSeveral research studies have been conducted in the past for the Airline Industry

to fully comprehend and understand the interaction between pilots in a multi-

crew environment and the automation they interact with. From these studies there

have been some significant improvements in the Simulator Training Programs and

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to improve the effective use of Automation

and the appropriate selection of Flight Director (FD) Modes.

However, although automation has been present in the Helicopter Industry for a

couple of decades now, there still seem to be a degree of “mode confusion” to which

FD modes should be selected during the different phases of flight (both onshore

and offshore) and the significant automation design differences in the various

helicopter types. This article will focus on reviewing some of these issues and how

they contribute to a helicopter being placed in an Undesired Helicopter State (UHS)

at some stage during the flight.

Page 139: HeliOps Issue 102
Page 140: HeliOps Issue 102

140

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

More importantly, it would be beneficial to look into active control measures to

manage these threats as they occur before they lead to an error that may further

escalate into the so called “error-chain.”

It is also important to review the content and structure of SOPs, especially how

they address the effective and safe use of automation. From personal audits and

flight reviews I have conducted, it is evident that most operators are not specific

enough (sometimes very ambiguous and vague) on what modes to select and

provide the crews with too many available options (i.e. either IAS or VS may be

selected during the descent).

Furthermore, SOPs are written by humans (mostly pilots) and may be

unintentionally designed and worded as such to potentially set people up for failure.

From experience, helicopter pilots will follow SOPs to the letter and there has been

incidents where a poorly defined SOP has significantly contributed to incidents.

USING A FRAMEWORK TO UNDERSTAND THE ONSET OF AN INCIDENT OR ACCIDENT

Before later analysing the dynamics of the S92 incident and AS332L2 accident, it

will be helpful if we can use a model to map out the various aspects and contributing

factors for each of these occurrences. This will provide the required framework

that can be applied to any event that has taken place, both in a proactive (Line

Operational Safety Audits or HFDM) and reactive manner (incident or accident).

Although most offshore helicopter pilots would have completed some form of

Crew Resource Management, Human Factors and/or Threat and Error Management

(TEM) training during their career, let’s review some of the elements of a TEM model

and how helicopter crews react to changes in the system and how a threat can either

Page 141: HeliOps Issue 102

141

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Page 142: HeliOps Issue 102

142

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

be managed successfully and the event becomes inconsequential. However, what

happens if this does not occur and how does a helicopter end up in an Undesired

Helicopter State (UHS)?

THE THREAT AND ERROR MANAGEMENT (TEM) MODELThe Threat and Error Management (TEM) model is a conceptual framework that

assists in understanding, from an operational perspective, the inter-relationship

between safety and human performance in dynamic and challenging operational

contexts, such as flying in adverse offshore weather.

The TEM model focuses simultaneously on the operational context and the

people discharging operational duties in such context. The model is descriptive

and diagnostic of both human and system performance. It is descriptive because it

captures human and system performance in the normal operational context, resulting

in realistic descriptions. It is diagnostic because it allows quantifying complexities of

the operational context in relation to the description of human performance in that

context, and vice-versa.

The TEM model can be used in several ways. As a safety analysis tool, the model

can focus on a single event, as is the case with accident/incident analysis; or it can be

used to understand systemic patterns within a large set of events, as is the case with

operational audits. This will be illustrated by analysing the two case studies ain a later

part that will provide the reader with the practical application of this model.

Originally developed for Airline operations, the TEM Model can nonetheless be

used at different levels and sectors within an organization, and across different

Page 143: HeliOps Issue 102

143

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

organizations within the aviation industry, such as Offshore Helicopter Operations.

It is therefore important, when applying TEM principles, to keep the user’s

perspective in the forefront. Depending on “who” is using TEM (front-line personnel

like the offshore helicopter pilots, intermediate management, senior management;

flight operations, maintenance, air traffic control), slight adjustments to related

definitions may be required. This article focuses on the helicopter crew as “user”, and

the discussion herein presents the perspective of helicopter crews’ use of TEM.

THE COMPONENTS OF THE TEM MODELThere are three basic components in the TEM model (see figure below), from the

perspective of helicopter crews: Threats, Errors and Undesired Helicopter States

(UHS). The model proposes that threats and errors are part of everyday offshore

operations that must be managed by helicopter crews, since both threats and

errors carry the potential to generate undesired helicopter states. Helicopter crews

must also manage UHS, since they carry the potential for unsafe outcomes. UHS

management is an essential component of the TEM model, as important as threat and

error management. UHS management largely represents the last opportunity to avoid

an unsafe outcome and thus maintain safety margins in offshore operations.

THREAT AND ERROR MODEL

The Threat and Error Management (TEM) model is a conceptual framework that assists in understanding, from an operational perspective, the inter-relationship between safety and human performance in dynamic and challenging operational contexts, such as flying in adverse offshore weather.

Page 144: HeliOps Issue 102

144

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

THREATSThreats are defined as “events or errors that occur beyond the influence of the

helicopter crew, increase operational complexity, and which must be managed to

maintain the margins of safety”. During typical offshore operations, helicopter crews

have to manage various contextual complexities. Such complexities would include,

for example, errors committed by People outside of the cockpit, such as Offshore

Radio Operators, Helicopter Landing Officers (HLOs), Flight Dispatchers, Ground

Support or Maintenance workers, dealing with adverse Environmental conditions

(offshore and enroute weather), Equipment malfunctions and in-flight emergencies,

and all the other Operational conditions and hazards of flying offshore . The TEM

model considers these complexities as threats because they all have the potential to

negatively affect offshore operations by reducing margins of safety.

There are 3 categories of threats, namely: anticipated, unanticipated and latent

which all have the potential to negatively affect flight operations by reducing

margins of safety. The objective of threat management is to gain awareness of the

potential threats within the operating environment both prior to and during flight.

Understanding what a threat is, and being aware of these threats enables the flight

crew to both plan and execute the flight in a safe manner by selecting the appropriate

countermeasure and achieving a safe outcome

ANTICIPATEDSome threats can be anticipated, since they are expected or known to the

helicopter crew. For example, helicopter crews can anticipate the consequences

Page 145: HeliOps Issue 102

of turbulence coming through the main structure by briefing their approach

considerations in advance, or prepare to set up for an Offshore NDB/Airborne Radar

Approach (ARA) when ceilings and visibility are at company minimas.

Other anticipated threats may include:

u Thunderstorms/icing/wind shear and other forecast inclement weather;

u Congested airport/heliport;

u Wires/obstacles;

u Complex SIDs/STARs/clearances;

u Cross and/or downwind approaches/landings;

u Outside air temperature/density altitude extremes;

u Mass and balance;

u Forecast/known bird activity.

UNANTICIPATED / UNEXPECTEDLY Some threats may occur unexpectedly, such as an in-flight helicopter system

malfunction that happens suddenly and without warning or severe icing enroute that

was not forecasted during the pre-flight briefing. In this case, helicopter crews must

apply their skills and knowledge acquired through training and operational experience

to manage these threats effectively as they occur, such as:

u In-flight helicopter malfunction;

u Automation – anomalies/over reliance;

u Un-forecast weather/turbulence/icing;

u ATC re-routing/congestion/non-standard phraseology/navigation aid

un serviceability/similar call-signs;

u Ground handling;

u Offshore Obstacles;

u Unmanned aircraft systems;

u TCAS RA/TA;

u Un-forecast bird activity;

u Contaminated/moving helidecks

LATENTLastly, some threats may not be directly obvious to, or observable by, helicopter

crews immersed in the operational context, and may need to be uncovered by safety

analyses.

These are considered latent threats and may include organisational weaknesses

and the psychological state of the pilot such as:

u Organisational culture/changes;

u Incorrect/incomplete documentation;

u Equipment design issues;

u Operational pressures/delays;

u Optical illusions;

Page 146: HeliOps Issue 102

146

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

u Fatigue/rostering;

u Stress;

u Complacency;

u Over or under confidence;

u Lack of recent experience and proficiency

u Failure to address / manage hazards that have been raised through the SMS

Regardless of whether threats are expected, unexpected, or latent, one measure

of the effectiveness of a helicopter crew’s ability to manage threats is whether threats

are detected with the necessary anticipation to enable the helicopter crew to respond

to them through deployment of appropriate countermeasures.

Threat management is a building block to Error and UHS management. Although

the threat-error linkage is not necessarily straightforward, although it may not be

always possible to establish a linear relationship, or one-to-one mapping between

threats, errors and undesired states, archival data demonstrates that mismanaged

threats are normally linked to errors committed by helicopter crews, which in turn are

often linked to undesired helicopter states. Threat management provides the most

proactive option to maintain margins of safety in offshore helicopter operations, by

voiding safety-compromising situations at their roots. As front-line threat managers,

helicopter crews are the last line of defence to keep threats from impacting on the

safety of offshore operations. If threats go unchecked or are not managed when they

occur, then this will most likely lead to error(s) being committed.

ERRORSErrors are defined “actions or inactions by the helicopter crew that lead to

deviations from organizational or helicopter crew intentions or expectations”.

Unmanaged and/or mismanaged errors frequently lead to UHS. Errors in the

operational context thus tend to reduce the margins of safety and increase the

probability of adverse events.

Page 147: HeliOps Issue 102

Errors can be spontaneous (i.e., without direct linkage to specific, obvious threats),

linked to threats, or part of an error chain. Examples of errors would include the

inability to maintain stabilized approach parameters, selecting an incorrect Flight

Director mode, failing to challenge the Pilot Flying when operating outside the SOPs,

or misinterpreting an ATC clearance.

Regardless of the type of error, an error’s effect on safety depends on whether the

helicopter crew detects and responds to the error before it leads to an UHS and to a

potential unsafe outcome. This is why one of the objectives of TEM is to understand

error management (i.e., detection and response), rather than solely focusing on error

causality (i.e., causation and commission).

From the safety perspective, operational errors that are timely detected and

promptly responded to (i.e., properly managed), errors that do not lead to UHS,

do not reduce margins of safety in offshore operations, and thus become

operationally inconsequential. In addition to its safety value, proper error

management represents an example of successful human performance, presenting

both learning and training value.

Capturing how errors are managed is then as important, if not more, than

capturing the prevalence of different types of error. It is of interest to capture if and

when errors are detected and by whom, the response(s) upon detecting errors, and

the outcome of errors. Some errors are quickly detected and resolved, thus becoming

operationally inconsequential, while others go undetected or are mismanaged. A

mismanaged error is defined as an error that is linked to or induces an additional

error (onset of the “error-chain”) or UHS.

Errors (derived from the TEM model) are grouped under three basic categories,

namely: aircraft handling, procedural and communication). In the TEM concept, errors

have to be “observable” and therefore, the TEM model uses the “primary interaction”

as the point of reference for defining the error categories.

AIRCRAFT HANDLING ERRORSTo be classified as an aircraft handling error, the pilot or flight crew must be

interacting with the aircraft (for example through its controls, automation or systems).

u Manual handling, flight controls: vertical, lateral or speed deviations, flight or

power settings;

u Automation: incorrect upper-mode settings and failure to monitor mode, engage/

disengage and arm/disarm;

u Systems, radio, instruments: incorrect anti-icing, incorrect altimeter, incorrect fuel

switches settings or incorrect radio frequency dialled;

u Heliport/airport operations: hovering – too low/too fast, attempting to turn down

wrong taxiway or runway, failure to hold short or missed taxiway or runway.

PROCEDURAL ERRORSTo be classified as a procedural error, the pilot or flight crew must be interacting

with a procedure (for example checklists; SOPs; etc.).

u Documentation: wrong mass and balance, fuel information, ATIS, or clearance

information recorded, misinterpreted items on paperwork; incorrect logbook

entries or incorrect application of MEL procedures.

Page 148: HeliOps Issue 102

148

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

u SOPs: failure to cross-verify automation inputs;

u Checklists: from memory; items missed, checklist performed late or at the wrong

time; wrong challenge and response;

u Callouts: omitted or incorrect callouts;

u Briefings: omitted briefings; items missed;

COMMUNICATIONS ERRORSTo be classified as a communication error, the pilot or flight crew must

be interacting with people (ATC, HLO, Offshore radio operators or other

crewmembers, etc.)

u Crew to external: missed calls, incorrect phraseology; transmitting while another

transmission is in progress; misinterpretations of instructions, incorrect read-back,

wrong clearance, taxiway, pad or runway communicated;

u Pilot to pilot/crew: miscommunication or misinterpretation.

Regardless of the type of error, it is the detection, interpretation and response

that influence the potential effect on safety. The objective of error management is the

timely detection and prompt appropriate response in flight operations in order for the

error to become operationally inconsequential.

A mismanaged error is defined as an error that is linked to or induces an additional

error (error chain) or UAS.

UNDESIRED HELICOPTER STATES (UHS)Undesired helicopter states are defined as ‘helicopter crew-induced helicopter

position or speed deviations, misapplication of flight controls, or incorrect automation

selections, associated with a reduction in margins of safety”. UHS that result from

ineffective threat and/or error management may lead to compromising situations

and reduce margins of safety in offshore operations. Often considered at the cusp of

becoming an incident or accident, undesired helicopter states must be managed by

helicopter crews.

Page 149: HeliOps Issue 102

149

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

Examples of UHS would include engaging go around when the helicopter is not

trimmed after take-off and engaging go around or selecting the incorrect Flight

Director Mode on the approach (i.e. VS – 2 cue only) and reducing power to a level

where the airspeed drops below VMINI (Minimum IFR Speed) that adversely impact

on the stability of the helicopter. Events such as equipment malfunctions or Flight

Dispatcher / Radio Operator errors can also reduce margins of safety in offshore

operations, but these would be considered threats.

UHS can be managed effectively, restoring margins of safety, or flight crew

response(s) can induce an additional error, incident, or accident.

UHS are grouped into three basic categories derived from the TEM model and

outlined below.

AIRCRAFT HANDLINGu Vortex ring state;

u Loss of Tail rotor Effectiveness (LTE);

u Degraded Visual Environment (DVE);

u Aircraft control (attitude);

u Vertical, lateral or speed deviations;

u Unnecessary weather penetration;

u Unauthorised airspace penetration;

u Operation outside aircraft limitations;

u Unstable approach;

u Continued landing after unstable approach;

u Over shooting the landing area or a hard landing.

GROUND NAVIGATION (HELIPORT OPERATIONS)u Proceeding towards wrong taxiway or runway;

u Wrong taxiway, ramp, helipad or hold spot.

INCORRECT AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATIONSu Systems;

u Flight controls;

u Automation;

u Engine;

u Mass and balance.

Regardless of the type of error, it is the detection, interpretation and response that influence the potential effect on safety. The objective of error management is the timely detection and prompt appropriate response in flight operations in order for the error to become operationally inconsequential.

Page 150: HeliOps Issue 102

150

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

The illustration above highlights how threats and errors are part of everyday

offshore operations that must be managed by helicopter crews, since both threats

and errors carry the potential to generate a UHS. Once a UHS has arisen it is equally

important to manage the UHS as it is the last opportunity for flight crews to ensure a

safe outcome in flight operations.

TEM COUNTERMEASURESHelicopter crews must, as part of the normal discharge of their operational duties,

employ countermeasures to keep threats, errors UHS from reducing margins of

safety in offshore operations. Examples of countermeasures would include checklists,

briefings, call-outs and SOPs, as well as personal strategies and tactics. Helicopter

crews dedicate significant amounts of time and energies to the application of

countermeasures to ensure margins of safety during flight operations. Empirical

observations during training and checking suggest that as much as 70% of flight crew

activities may be countermeasures-related activities.

All countermeasures are necessarily helicopter crew actions. However, some

countermeasures to threats, errors and undesired helicopter states that crews employ

build upon “hard” resources provided by the aviation system. These resources are

already in place in the system before helicopter crews report for duty, and are

therefore considered as systemic-based countermeasures. The following would

be examples of “hard” resources that helicopter crews employ as systemic-based

countermeasures:

Planning countermeasures are essential for managing anticipated and unexpected

threats, for example:

u Thorough planning/briefing, concise, not rushed, and meet requirements;

u Plans/aims/decisions communicated and acknowledged;

u Workload assignment roles and responsibilities defined and communicated for

normal and non-normal situations;

ThreatsAnticipatedUnexpected

Latent

ErrorsAircraft Handling

ProceduralCommunication

UHSAircraft Handling

Ground NavigationIncorrect configuration

ACCIDENT OR

INCIDENT

Page 151: HeliOps Issue 102

151

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

u Contingency management with effective strategies to manage threats to safety;

u Threats and their consequences anticipated and all available resources used to

manage threats.

Execution countermeasures are essential for error detection and error response, for

example:

u Crew members actively monitored and cross-checked systems and other crew

members;

u Aircraft position, settings, and crew actions verified;

u Operational tasks prioritised and properly managed to handle primary flight

duties;

u Avoidance of task fixation;

u Avoidance of work overload;

u Automation properly managed to balance situational and workload requirements;

u Automation setup briefed to other crew members;

u Effective recovery techniques from automation anomalies.

Review countermeasures are essential for managing the changing conditions of a

flight, for example:

u Evaluation and modification of plans;

u Crew decisions and actions openly analysed to make sure the existing plan was

the best plan;

u Crew members asked questions to investigate and/or clarify current plans of

action;

u Crew members not afraid to express a lack of knowledge: ‘Nothing taken for

granted’;

u Crew members state critical information or solutions with appropriate persistence;

u Crew members speak up without hesitation.

Page 152: HeliOps Issue 102

152

DELIVERIN

G G

LO

BA

L C

OV E R A G E O F T H

E

HE

LI

CO

PT

ER

IN

DUSTRY•

100I S S U E S

CONCLUSIONThis article provided the reader with the fundamentals of the Threat and Error

Management (TEM) model and how the various components of the Model can

contribute to a potential incident or accident. It highlighted how offshore helicopter

crews are exposed throughout their flight with different types of threats. If these

threats are managed by the crew, the event becomes inconsequential. However, it

the threat(s) are not managed at the time it was introduced, then this will potentially

lead to error(s) being committed by the crews. This was refer to as the error-chain.

The crews still have an opportunity to prevent this chain of errors escalating through

several countermeasures introduced, if effectively managed, then the system is

restored and once again the event becomes inconsequential.

However, if both threats and errors are not managed by the crews in an effectively

and reasonable timeframe, then this will introduce an Undesired Helicopter State. This

is the last phase of the TEM model for the crew to take the appropriate action(s) to

restore the system to normal. Any failure to do so, will ultimately set the helicopter up

for an incident or accident.

This article has laid the foundation for the reader to be able to use this Model to

effectively analyse any incident or accident to determine the contributing factors

that lead to any event. This will then provide the user to change Standard Operating

Procedures (SOPs) and Simulator Training Programs as required to enforce the best

countermeasures and strategies to effectively manage threats and errors as they

occur and to recover from any Undesired Helicopter States. HO

Page 153: HeliOps Issue 102

At AMTC 2016, you’ll find:• 2500 attendeesrepresentingover250internationalemergencymedical

transportprograms.

• Morethan150 education sessionsontopicspertinenttothefollowingdisciplines:

Aviation,Safety,Clinical,Communications,Management/Administration&Marketing,GlobalPerspectives

• Atradeshowfeaturingmorethan150 vendorspresentingawidevarietyofthelatestproductsandservicesavailableforemergencymedicaltransportproviders!

• Unmatchednetworkingeventsandopportunities!

• The AAMS SIM Cup!

Thisannualcriticalcareskillseventutilizesthelatestinhumanpatientsimulation.Upto10teamsgohead-to-headtoshowofftheirrealtime,realsituationskillsonstate-of-the-artpatientsimulators.

Visit www.AAMS.org for all the details and to register.

September 26–28, 2016C H A R L O T T E

AMTC16CA210mmx297mm+Bleed.indd 1 2/10/16 12:50 PM

Page 154: HeliOps Issue 102

INNOVATING THE WAY THE WORLD FLIESThe Bell 505 Jet Ranger X is a new fi ve-seat aircraft designed to deliver safety, effi ciency and reliability

through the use of advanced technology. Featuring the Garmin G1000H™ fl ight deck and large cabin doors

for easy loading of passengers and cargo, the new Bell 505 Jet Ranger X offers multi-mission capabilities

with exceptional performance characteristics.

BELLHELICOPTER.COM

© 2

016

BE

LL H

ELIC

OP

TE

R T

EX

TR

ON

IN

C.

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO

TAP FOR MORE

INFO