hepatic fibrosis

Upload: mohamed-noor

Post on 07-Apr-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    1/56

    Hepatic Fibrosis

    Maissa El Raziky , M.D

    Professor of Endemic Medicine andHepatology Cairo University

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    2/56

    Hepatic fibrosis represents the woundhealing response to liver injury from a widevariety of etiologies.

    Cirrhosis is the most advanced stage offibrosis, connoting more than fibrosisalone, but rather distortion of the liver

    parenchyma associated with septae andnodule formation, altered blood flow andthe potential development of liver failure.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    3/56

    Topics covered

    Process of Fibro-genesis. Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis

    Liver Biopsy .

    Non-invasive tests to assess liver fibrosisSerological tests

    Imaging techniques

    Therapies for Hepatic Fibrosis Current andFuture

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    4/56

    Liver fibrosis is the result of an imbalance

    between production and dissolution of

    extracellular matrix.Stellate cells, portal myofibroblasts, and

    bone marrow derived cells converge in a

    complex interaction with hepatocytes and

    immune cells to provoke scarring in

    response to liver injury.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    5/56

    Remarkable progress happened in the field

    of hepatic fibrosis in a range of areas,

    including the expansion of potentialcellular sources ofextracellular matrix

    (ECM), the intimate crosstalk with immune

    and inflammatory cell subsets, pathways

    regulating fibrosis regression, geneticdeterminants of fibrosis risk.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    6/56

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    7/56

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    8/56

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    9/56

    Hepatosplenic Schistosomiasis

    Gross anatomical features and a complex set of

    vascular changes characterize schistosomal

    hepatopathy as a peculiar form of chronic liver

    disease, clinically known as "hepatosplenicschistosomiasis".

    Damage to the muscular walls of the portal vein

    may be followed by dissociation of smooth

    muscle cells and their transition toward

    myofibroblasts, which appear only as transient

    cells in schistosomal portal fibrosis.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    10/56

    Morphology of HSCs in normal liver) .A (diagram of the hepatic sinusoid

    demonstrating the relative orientation of stellate cells (in blue, indicated with

    arrows) within the sinusoidal architecture .) B (higher resolution drawing of

    stellate cells situated within the subendothelial space

    Hepatic Stellate Cells

    A

    B

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    11/56

    Hepatic Stellate Cells

    Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) have dominatedstudies exploring mechanisms of liver fibrosis

    over the last two decades.

    HSCs are resident vitamin A-storing cells in the

    perisinusoidal space of Disse between thesinusoidal endothelium and hepatocytes.

    Following hepatic injury, HSC become

    activated, proliferate and produce extracellular

    matrix (ECM) .

    Both the characterization of HSCs and their

    behavior in hepatic injury have been well

    characterized,

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    12/56

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    13/56

    PATHOGENESIS OF LIVER FIBROSIS

    Alterations in Microvasculature in

    Cirrhosis

    Alterations in Microvasculature in

    Cirrhosis

    y Activation of stellate cells

    y Collagen deposition in space ofDisse

    y Constriction of sinusoids

    y Defenestration of sinusoids

    y Activation of stellate cells

    y Collagen deposition in space ofDisse

    y Constriction of sinusoids

    y Defenestration of sinusoids

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    14/56

    Stellate cell activation. Stellate cell activation is a key pathogenic

    feature underlying liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Multiple and variedstimuli contribute to the induction and maintenance of activation,including (but not limited to) cytokines, peptides, and the extracellularmatrix itself. Key phenotypic features of activation include theproduction of extracellular matrix, loss of retinoids, proliferation, ofup-regulation of smooth muscle proteins, secretion of peptides andcytokines (which have autocrine effects), and up-regulation ofvarious cytokine and peptide receptors

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    15/56

    Initiating signals of injury

    These fibrogenic stimuli include:

    Reactive oxygen species.

    Hypoxia. Inflammatory and immune responses.

    Apoptosis .

    Steatosis.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    16/56

    Cellular Sources of Fibrogenesis Stellate

    cell activation and Myofibroblasts

    Stellate cell activation refers to the conversion

    of a resting vitamin A-rich cell to one that is

    proliferating, fibrogenic and contractile.

    Other mesenchymal cell populations alsocontribute to extracellular matrix accumulation.

    Stellate cell activation remains the most

    dominant pathway leading to hepatic fibrosis.

    Activation consists of two major phases,Initiation and Perpetuation, followed by

    Resolution of fibrosis if injury subsides

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    17/56

    Pathways of stellate cell activation and resolution. Following liver injury,HSCs undergo activation, which connotes a transition from quiescentvitamin A-rich cells into proliferative, fibrogenic, and contractilemyofibroblasts. The major phenotypic changes after activation includeproliferation, contractility, fibrogenesis, matrix degradation, chemotaxis,retinoid loss, and WBC chemoattraction. Key mediators underlyingthese effects are shown. The fate of activated stellate cells duringresolution of liver injury is uncertain but may include reversion to aquiescent phenotype and/or selective clearance by apoptosis

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    18/56

    Initiation (also called a "pre-inflammatory stage"),refers to early changes in gene expression and

    phenotype that render the cells responsive to

    other cytokines and stimuli.

    Initiation results mostly from paracrine stimulation,including altered surrounding extracellular matrix,

    as well as exposure to lipid peroxide, LPS and

    products of damaged hepatocytes.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    19/56

    Perpetuation results from the effects ofthese stimuli on maintaining the activatedphenotype and generating fibrosis.

    Perpetuation involves autocrine as well asparacrine loops. It is comprised of several

    discrete responses including : proliferation,

    contractility,

    fibrogenesis,

    matrix degradation,

    retinoid loss,

    inflammatory cell infiltration.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    20/56

    Resolution of fibrosis refers to pathways

    that either drive the stellate cell to

    apoptosis, senescence, or contribute to

    reversion of activated stellate cells to a

    more quiescent phenotype.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    21/56

    Immunoregulatory roles of stellate cells

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    22/56

    Diagram of lymphocyte recruitment and trafficking within the liverparenchyma. Hepatic sinusoids have specialized features including afenestrated endothelium, a low-velocity flow rate, and the absence ofendothelial cell selectins. The initial capture of lymphocytes in hepatic

    sinusoids occurs through integrin-mediated interactions with adhesionmolecules. During the triggering phase, lymphocyte G-coupled receptorsrespond to chemokine signals on endothelial cells, leading to aconformational change in lymphocyte-associated integrins. Chemokines aresynthesized by endothelial and hepatic parenchymal cells. Transendothelialmigration (diapedesis) into the surrounding tissue is facilitated by both

    chemokine recognition and intracellular cytoskeletal changes

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    23/56

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    24/56

    Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    25/56

    Currently

    Liver Biopsy is still considered

    the gold standardfor assessing liver histology.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    26/56

    Clinicians depend mainly on liver biopsy toestimate the degree of liver fibrosis.

    Knowing the rate of progression of fibrosis

    represents an important surrogateendpoint for evaluation of the vulnerability

    of patients for complications.

    For assessment of any treatment's impacton natural history.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    27/56

    Finding non-invasive tests to assess liver

    fibrosiswould be very useful in follow-up.

    These tests include:Serological tests.

    Imaging techniques.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    28/56

    Serological tests

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    29/56

    .Over the past decade, there has been renewedenthusiasmto develop noninvasive serummarkers or tests to assess the presence and

    severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease.

    . Although a single marker or test has lackedthe necessary accuracy to predict fibrosis,

    different combinations of these markers

    or tests have shown encouraging results.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    30/56

    Many different parameters have been

    evaluated including:

    Circulating products of collagen synthesis or

    degradation.

    Enzymes involved in collagen biosynthesis,

    extracellular matrix glycoproteins andproteoglycans or matrix-degrading enzymes

    and their inhibitors.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    31/56

    In 2001, FibroTest for the assessment of

    fibrosis; ActiTest for the assessment ofnecroinflammatory activity (FT-AT) were

    introduced.

    These are a panel of biochemical markers :2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin,

    apolipoprotein A1, -glutamyl

    transpeptidase, and total bilirubin

    (FibroTest) plus alanine aminotransferase(ActiTest).

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    32/56

    A total of 16 publications were identified. An

    integrated database was constructed

    using 1,570 individual data, to which

    applied analytical recommendations. The

    control group consisted of 300

    prospectively studied blood donors(Poynard ,et al. Comp Hepatol. 2004; Sep 3: 8. )

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    33/56

    Positivepredictive

    value

    Negativepredictive

    value

    Specificity

    Sensitivity

    Cut off used forMETAVIR stages

    conversion

    AUROC (SE)

    Stage/Prevalence

    MarkerPatientnumber

    Integrateddatabase

    0.480.940.550.920.210.83

    (0.01)

    F2F3F

    4/0.31

    FibroTest1,570WithBlood

    Donors

    0.510.920.620.870.27

    0.540.910.680.840.31

    0.610.850.810.680.48

    0.670.820.870.560.58

    0.760.770.950.380.72

    0.760.760.950.350.74

    0.780.760.960.330.75

    0.490.890.410.920.210.78

    (0.01)F2F3F4/0.38

    FibroTest1,270Withoutblood

    donors

    0.510.860.480.870.27

    0.540.850.550.840.31

    0.610.790.730.680.48

    0.670.750.830.560.58

    0.760.700.950.380.72

    0.760.700.930.350.74

    0.780.690.940.330.75

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    34/56

    The use of the FibroTest and ActiTest can

    be recommended as an alternative to liverbiopsy for the assessment of liver injury in

    patients with chronic hepatitis C.

    In clinical practice, liver biopsy should berecommended only as a second line test,

    i.e., in case of high risk of error of

    biochemical tests.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    35/56

    Several models have been developed whichconsist of the measurement of routine laboratory data:a) a model combining platelets, GT, cholesterol and age

    (Forns model)

    b) a model using an AST to platelet ratio index (APRI).

    The Forns's model predicted mild fibrosis in 71.4% whilethe APRI model did it in 72.7%. The Forns's modelconfirmed advanced fibrosis in 78.6% against 54.2%

    from the APRI one.The predictive capacity of advanced fibrosis or exclusion of

    significant fibrosis reached more than 90% when bothmodels were used together. (Romero Gomez et al,2005)

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    36/56

    A total score of 3 biological parameterscombined PT, platelets and transminases,was significantly more enabled in the severe

    fibrosis than in the mild fibrosis but it was not of

    much importance in 30% of cases. This scoredoes not seem to grant exemption from needle

    liver biopsy, but it can be improved by the

    association of other direct markers of fibrosis.

    (Mohammed et al.,2005)

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    37/56

    Imaging techniques

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    38/56

    Ultrasonography is a relatively inexpensive,portable, safe, readily accepted by mostpatients, and real-time modality, all of whichmake it one of the most widely used imagingmodalities in medicine.

    Ultrasound is accurate for predicting the finaldiagnosis in patients with established cirrhosisand its sequlae (splenomegaly, ascites, focallesions).

    However the diagnostic accuracy of routine USfor early liver cirrhosis is low.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    39/56

    Portal Tracts

    Grading

    Grade I : 3-5 mm

    Grade II :>5-7 mm

    Grade III :> 7 mm

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    40/56

    Portal Tracts

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    41/56

    Gray scale and color Doppler

    epa s c y nde

    epa

    c

    arery

    res

    s

    en

    de

    P=0.03

    ros s rades

    P=0.01

    There is controversy with regard to the reproducibility

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    42/56

    Hepatic vein transit times

    The relative transit time through the splanchnic bed of

    a bolus of microbubbles agent Levovist is

    measured.

    HVTT can assess HCV related liver disease with

    clear differentiation between mild hepatitis and

    cirrhosis. There were significant differencesbetween these two groups and the

    moderate/severe hepatitis group.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    43/56

    Copyright 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

    Illustration of a normal hepatic vein transit time (HVTT) (43 seconds) and a comparative earlyHVTT in a patient with cirrhosis (14 seconds). Note 20 seconds of baseline are collected beforeinjection of the microbubbles. The continuous horizontal line denotes a Doppler intensity 10%

    above baseline and hence HVTTs are taken as the intersection of this line with that of the Dopplerintensity trace.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    44/56

    FibroScan

    Transient elastography (FibroScan) is a new non-invasive rapid bedside and reproducible method,allowing evaluating liver fibrosis bymeasurement of liver stiffness.

    The shear elasticity probe is a device based onone-dimensional (1-D) transient elastography, atechnique that uses both ultrasound (5 MHz)and low-frequency (50 Hz) elastic waves, whosepropagation velocity is directly related toelasticity.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    45/56

    2.5

    cm

    4 cm

    1 cm

    Explored volume

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    46/56

    Liver stiffness in the normal population and factors

    influencing its measurement

    ColomboRoulotCorpechot

    32742971Number of subjects

    Blood donorsMedical check-upHealthy volunteersPopulation

    4.9 1.725.4 1.524.8 (2.5-6.9)Mean stiffness

    (KPa)7.88.6-95th centile

    No effectNo effectNo effectAge

    M = FM > FM > FGender

    IncreasedIncreasedIncreasedHigh BMI

    Increased--Fatty liver

    -Increased-Metabolic

    syndrome

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    47/56

    Diagnostic performance of TE in the

    diagnosis of significant fibrosis

    Yone

    da

    KelleherCorpechotFraquelliZiolCasteraMarcellinOliveri

    6712995200251183170268Patients

    4950605065746969F2 or

    higher(%)

    NAFL

    D

    NAFLDPBC/PSCHCVHCVHCVHBVHBVEtiology

    6.68.77.37.98.87.17.27.5Cut Off(KPa)

    8281847256677093Sensitivity (%)

    8178878491898388Specificity (%)

    0.870.860.920.860.790.830.810.96AUROC

    C l iR ltN bSt d

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    48/56

    ConclusionResultsNumberStudy

    TE is a promising method for the

    detection of cirrhosis. Its use for the

    follow-up and management could be

    of great interest and should be

    further evaluated.

    Stiffness was significantly correlated

    to the fibrosis stage

    Cut- off value of 17.6 kPa, patientswith cirrhosis were detected with

    both PPV and NPV of 90%.

    711Foucher et al. 2005

    FibroScan is a simple and effective

    method for assessing liver fibrosis,

    with similar performance to FibroTest

    and APRI. The combined use of

    FibroScan and FibroTest could avoida biopsy procedure in most patients

    with chronic hepatitis C.

    Cut-off values were 7.1 kPa183Castera et al. 2005

    The Fibroscan is a noninvasive,

    painless, rapid and objective method

    to quantify liver fibrosis.

    Liver elasticity measurements were

    reproducible (standardized

    coefficient of variation: 3%),

    operator-independent and well

    correlated (partial correlation

    coefficient = 0.71, p < < 0.0001) to

    fibrosis grade (METAVIR).

    106Sandrin et al. 2003

    LSM appears as a reliable tool to

    detect significant fibrosis or cirrhosis

    in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

    LSM was well correlated with

    fibrosis stage

    327Ziol et al. 2005

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    49/56

    Fibroscan is a sensitive tool in detection ofsignificant fibrosis F2 as assessed by theMETAVIR score at a cut off level of 6.35 kpa

    and in detection of cirrhosis F4 at a cut offlevel of 10.75 kpa

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    50/56

    MRI

    The use of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)measurements based on diffusion-weighted MRI(DWI) are potentially useful for the evaluation offibrosis staging in the liver.

    The sensitivity of MRI in diagnosing liver cirrhosiswas 87% and the specificity 92%. The mostcharacteristic MRI features were enlargement ofsegment one , narrowing of hepatic veins , signsof portal hypertension , fibrosis , and nodularliver margin .

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    51/56

    Conclusion

    The advantage of the non-invasive tests or

    techniques is that they provide a rapid and

    quantitative estimation of fibrosis.

    With these new methods, it is possible to followthe progression of the disease and its regression

    either spontaneously or under treatment.

    Clinicians have in their hands several painless

    tools to explore liver fibrosis that can be easilyrepeated.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    52/56

    Therapies for Hepatic Fibrosis

    Current and Future

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    53/56

    The ideal therapies will be those that are orally,

    available, well tolerated during chronic usage,

    and do not simply prevent progression of

    fibrosis, but rather regress scar, leading to

    stabilization or improvement in liver function.

    f f

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    54/56

    The broad targets of anti-fibrotic therapy can

    be divided among several categories

    Cure the primary disease to prevent injury. Reduce inflammation or the host response in order to avoid

    stimulating stellate cell activation. (RAAS-UDCA)

    Hepatoprotection to reduce hepatocyte injury, thus

    attenuating downstream signals of activation to stellate cells

    Directly down-regulate stellate cell activation (Antioxidants,including vitamin E)

    Neutralize proliferative, fibrogenic, contractile and/orproinflammatory responses of stellate cells (vitamin A).

    Stimulate apoptosis of stellate cells.

    Increase the degradation of scar matrix

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    55/56

    A variety of approaches have been

    successful in attenuating fibrosis in animal

    models, but these need to be tested in

    human trials.

    Directly targeting accumulated fibrotic

    matrix with protease activity merits further

    development.

  • 8/6/2019 Hepatic Fibrosis

    56/56