hi gh rad iation to mat erials

HIGH RADIATION TO MATERIALS

Ans Pardonsfor the HiRadMat project team

IEFC Workshop, March 22, 2011

Outline The HiRadMat facility – Why, What, When, Where Status

WANF(*) dismantling Primary beam line installation

Planning: Installation & Commissioning in 2011 Irradiation Area Layout & Operation Summary

EDMS No: 1136640

Thanks to: I. Efthymiopoulos, S. Evrard, M. Meddahi, C. Hessler, C.Theis, N. Conan, Y. Algoet, Ph. Trilhe, C. Magnier, M. Lazzaroni, O. Choisnet, D. Grenier, J.-L. Grenard, N. Charitonidis

part of the EUCARD FP7 program

(*)West Area Neutrino Facility

The HiRadMat Facility

IEFC Workshop Mar. 22, 2011

2 Why, What & When Luminosity increases in particle accelerators materials of near-beam

equipment must be able to withstand the higher beam intensity Need for a facility to test materials in an intense pulsed beam to investigate

damage effects from heat & radiation with increasing intensity. analyze the threshold of destructive effects to find material limitations

HiRadMat = Facility to study the impact of intense pulsed beams on materials Thermal management (heating) & thermal shock (pressure waves) Radiation damage to materials - change of mechanical properties

Beam extracted from SPS (450GeV/c): provides 1011 protons per bunch, 288 bunches per pulse, 30 pulses per user 1015 protons per user, ~2.4MJ/pulse

Beam size 0.1-0.5mm (1σ) at impact. Aim for 2011: 3 users - LHC phase 2 collimator (jaw materials), tungsten powder

(as high-power target for future neutrino beams), beam windows. Interest expressed for > 2011: protection devices, machine components,

material studies, irradiation tests of electronics.

Why

Wha

tW

hen

Ans Pardons

The HiRadMat Facility3 Where

SPS

TI 2

TT60

Beam

End of common partwith TI 2 transfer line

50 m

Beam

TT66 new line

Access to HiRadMat intrinsically linked to LHC (injection)

TI2 LHC

HiRadMat test objects

TT61 (to former West Area)

TNC (former WANF target hall)

IEFC Workshop Mar. 22, 2011Ans Pardons

The HiRadMat Facility


4

T1 - former West Area primary target & shielding & MTR magnets: dismount

TNC - former neutrino target hall with secondary beam elements: replace services, dismount beam elements & complete HRM beam dump

Where & Location of main dismantling activities

BA7

TCC6 B.846TNC

WANF target chamberWith secondary beamline

T9: former neutrino beam target: dismount target & collimators and install HRM beam dump in and behind former T9 shielding castle

T1

TI2

Former beamline targets radiation

T9

HiRadMat User Experimental Area

TJ7

Ans Pardons

HiRadMat User Experimental Area

TJ7

TNC

Status – WANF dismantling5 General dismantling


Hot objects & high remnant radiation dose Remote handling tools

Cameras on renovated crane and in TNC Automatic hook for standard blocks Shielded fork lift Several custom-made hooks & lifting beams

Shielding during intervention & transport

Ans Pardons

Status - WANF dismantling6

Horn and support manually dismounted from TNC and sent to waste storage in ISR(*)

Collimator and support 80% remotely dismounted and sent to waste storage in ISR

Example 1: WANF Horn & collimator removal


(*) Intersecting Storage Rings

Status - WANF dismantling7 Example 2: T9 dismantling (transformation)


T9 target station (installed 1993, 5 years of beam)

T9: transformation to HiRadMat beam dump:1. Remove target, all collimators & monitor2. Replace upstream collimator with new collimator3. Replace other items with TED(*)-type beam dump4. Close shielding and complete HRM beam dump

Ste

el u

pstre

am c

ollim

ator

ν-p

rodu

ctio

n ta

rget

Cop

per d

owns

tream

col

limat

or b

lock

s

Dow

nstre

am m

onito

r

Ans Pardons

(*) Target External Dump

8

Dose rate near target and upstream collimator

Items designed in 1993 for remote removal! Remote removal, transport to ISR in shielded containers

or on shielded trailers

Target & upstream collimator

Status - WANF dismantling

Dose rate (mSv/h) measured at contact with target container and cradles (12.01.11)

3.5 1657.5 15 25Upstream collimator

ν-production target

Downstreamcollimator


9

Dose rate in & near copper collimator blocks

Reminder: forbidden area if dose rate > 100mSv/h The collimator blocks’ geometry brings several challenges

Each block (2.7t) has hot outer surface Axis of 2 blocks is outside range of overhead crane Items not designed for remote handling!!!

4 threaded holes per block 1993: installed manually with forklift, lifting rings and straps

Downstream collimator blocks dismantling: Challenges


60@5cm4301000

20@40cm

Dose rate (mSv/h) measured inside and near the collimator (12.01.11)


10 ALARA Level 3 committee


Following > 100mSv/h dose rate measurement, the case of T9 dismantling was presented to the ALARA L3 committee

Results & consequences: Review took place of detailed dismantling procedure by CERN safety

specialists from outside the project (M. Tavlet & P. Bonnal) Detailed risk analysis established Decision taken to NOT remove the copper blocks out of TNC (yet)

Blocks with handling plates will be placed in custom-build containers in a 40cm thick iron sarcophagus downstream TNC

The evacuation of the blocks from TNC will be carefully planned by EN/MEF & DGS/RP and executed in the “near” future (e.g. shut-down 2013)

Green light from reviewers and hierarchy obtained to start T9 dismantling on 2/2. Dismantling work took ~10 days,

collective dose of ~1.2mSvIEFC Workshop Mar. 22, 2011Ans Pardons

11 Downstream collimator blocks dismantling: Solutions

Status –WANF dismantling

Lifting & shielding plates fixed manually on copper blocks Custom-made lifting beam takes 2 blocks at the time Shielding in place for all manual interventions Extensive tests on mock-up

Optimise tools Define camera positions for handling Training interveners

Minimise risk & dose personnel


12 T9 downstream collimator dismantling in pictures

Status –WANF dismantling

Lifting test before closing roof

Placing block in container

Separating blocks 21

Fixing plates on lower blocks

Moving upper blocks with fixed lifting plates

Blocks in temporary storage location

Sarcophagus withcontainers ready


Status - WANF Dismantling

S. Evrard - IEFC Feb.11,2011

Waste management13

• Radioactive waste is treated in several steps:1. Rough cleaning in WANF (specialized

company ENDEL Nucléaire)2. Removal from WANF TT61 TT43. In TT4: thorough decontamination and

disassembling4. Volume reduction in RP waste

workshop in building 5735. Convenient conditioning for long term

storage6. Long term storage in ISR

Volume reduction x 10

Contaminated objects: Adapted closed containers

Long term storage ISR

WANFTT4

ISR

573

BA7

Disposal path

Status - Primary beamline installation


14 Installation progress of TT66 beamline

Equipment Status Comments

Magnets 25/25 installed

Vacuum system 88% installed 77% leak tested

Electrical feeds 95%

Cooling connections 85%

Power converters 7/13 installed Last one: End of March

Beam instrumentation & Control 15/17 installed BPKG, 1 BTV to install weeks 13/19

Machine interlocks almost ready Link to power converters not yet commissioned

Survey 90% Remaining work during week 13 or short accesses

Summary table status mid March 2011 (upstream line TT60/TI2 is 100% installed)Ans Pardons

Ans Pardons

Planning 2011


15 Installation & commissioning

Shutdown works: dismount air ducts, dismount horn, collimators & T9 target,

install beamline magnets, install general services, ...)

Short accesses (linked to LHC injection

activity): install doors, beam instr., vacuum,

align beam elements, ... • T9 transformed (no

TED)• Beam line installed

& elements connected (incl. beam instrumentation)

• TED dump core and downstream muon dumps installed

• Ventilation operational (challenge!)

• Beam line under beam vacuum

• Exp area in TNC installed & operational (cabling, services, ...)

• Surface preparation lab & control room ready

Ans Pardons

Planning 2011


16 Installation & commissioning• Installation & handling

equipment & procedures ready, tested & approved

• Downstream cool-down area ready

Parameter ValueExperiments in 2011 ~3Maximum intensity per experiment

1×1015 protons<30 full intensity pulses

Waiting time after experiment for de-installation

≥ 2 weeks

Access during experiment (except urgent interventions)

no

Control of experiment and data taking

remote

Maximum intensity per year <<1×1016 protons

Commissioning plans


17

Hardware commissioning on-going: powering tests, etc. Dry runs to check the overall beam equipment functionality

without beam (week 14):Control applications, interlock, magnets/power converters, beam instrumentation.

Commissioning of the facility with beam (weeks 20 and 21): Tests with probe beams:

Aperture checks, beam parameter checks, steering, beam size / focal point position adjustment, position / intensity stability, BI (calibration, etc.), controls, logging, interlocking tests, etc.

Some high intensity shots to check the consistency with the nominal beam intensity.

Ans Pardons

Readiness 2011


18

Dismantling 99% finished Beamline 90% installed, remaining part planned for week 13 Beam dump will be completed in week 19 Ventilation system will be ready for first user. Installation before

week 20 unsure. Discussion on-going to allow limited amount of test pulses/protons without ventilation.

Experimental area test tables designed & tested, production under way, will be ready for first user

Cabling for test tables remains to be done during the next technical stops (weeks 13, 19&25). Installation sequence will be done such that the needs for 2011 will be met before installation first user.

Remaining work

Ans Pardons

Irradiation area layout


19

3 possible focal points for beam 3 positions for test stand Geometry & services available to users on test stand:

Volume ~1.5x0.7x0.7 m³, weight up to 4 tons Cooling circuit, electricity, neutral gas available Signal connectors (e.g. for camera, motorization, beam instrumentation,

vibration measurement, … ) ~25m upstream: Patch panel to test signals/services before beam ~100m downstream: cool-down storage area for test objects

Layout & conceptRadiation Measurement

Beam Loss MonitorsBeam Focal Points:

Ans Pardons

Irradiation area layout


20

Test stand : base table in TNC and mobile table with test object (remote handling) comes from surface

Interface between tables : remote / automatic plug-in connectors (water, power, signal)

Check user system (motors, camera, laser, ...) before beam in TJ7, during beam only from surface control room

Design

Large object, e.g.LHC Collimator

Small object, e.g. material sample

Ans Pardons

Operation


21

Guidelines (up to) 10 users/year, (up to) 1015 protons/user This quota includes several pilot pulses during setup

Pilot pulses can be done in an almost transparent way to present operations

High-intensity pulses will be done in dedicated HiRadMat cycles impact on other SPS physics users

User selection panel will: (panel with experts from: radiation protection, safety, beam, physics goals, engineering, PS&SPS operation as well as external experts) Review the beam requests, establish criteria for acceptance/rejection

(e.g. scientific value, beam feasibility, safety concerns, impact to the facility,…) Establish priority list of experiments with respect to the available beam time Distribute beam time and schedule experiments

Ans Pardons

Operation22 Operating procedure: first ideas

A HiRadMat “brochure” will show what HiRadMat offers in services, signal, alignment, control room, observation equipment, beam type, ...

Approval of user’s proposal by user selection panel Preparation of interface parts (windows, containers, observation equipment,

motorised tables etc.) in collaboration with area engineers & designers Arrival at CERN of users ~2 weeks before beam: mounting test object on

mobile table, alignment and test connectors in surface lab and control room During the week before beam (LHC technical stop): remote installation,

remote test of signals, motorization, observation equipment, etc. Beam start. Observation and data taking from control room on surface. After beam tests: remote moving of mobile test table to cool-down area Later, possibly only during end-of-year shut-down: bringing test object back

to surface (RP lab)


A detailed and official “operating procedure” document will be written & released by the project team in due time

Operation


23 Activation dose rate after 1 user test – Fluka calculation results

After 1 hour: <50000µSv/h(*)avg. at 40cm, detailed results available

After 1 week: <5000µSv/h(*)avg. at 40cm, detailed results available

27070 1000 40002051.40.4 µSv/h15E3 50E3

Assumption: Short SPS cycle, 1.98E12 p/s for 504 s (1e15 protons) The beam hits the carbon jaw of a typical collimator

Activation dose near(*) test object after 1 hour/1 week cool-down

Beam dumpTest object To TJ7

Ans Pardons

Operation


24

Assumption: 1016 protons over 1 year on a 15cm long copper test object, followed by removal of test object

Background dose rate in TNC after 1 day / 1 month

Background dose rate after a full year of operation – test object removed

After 1 day: <100µSv/h

After 1 month: <25µSv/h

205 50 10020.60.20.1 µSv/h

During annual shut-down: possible to intervene near test stands for repair or upgrade

Ans Pardons

Summary


25

Work done in 2010 and early 2011: WANF dismounted Primary beamline installed

Readiness for 2011: Remaining works for week 13 & 19 well defined,

prepared & planned Ready for dry run week 14, commissioning week 20 Ready for scheduled users from week 26 on

Planning for 2011: aim for 3 users w26, w32, w39 “Operating procedure” document under way

95%

Ans Pardons

HiRadMat knocking at the door


26

Thank you for listening – Any questions?

Ans Pardons

Extra: Introduction


27

Protons Heavy ions

Beam parametersBeam extracted from SPS (450GeV/c): provides 1011 protons per bunch, 300 bunches per pulse, 100 pulses per user and beam spot 0.5-2mm² at impact.

Extra: Dismantling - transformation


28 TED Geometry & materials

Extra: Dismantling


29

Design new equipment with remote handling & waste disposal in mind Collaboration with RP during design Write future dismantling procedures now Update technical drawings “as-built”

Largest dismantling dose from cables, cleaning, etc. Use specialised company & invest in tools Install new cables, trays, lights etc. with dismantling in

mind

lessons learnt from dismantling

Extra: Dismantling


30

Lesson learnt: also install services with easy future dismantling in mind! (largest doses are not taken on the most complex/radioactive objects)

origin of dose during dismantling WANF

Add dismantling T9 in Jan. 2011: ~1200 µSv)

31 T1 removal

September 2009 January 2011

February 2011


Example: Dismantling T1 target station & MTR magnets31

Extra: Dismantling

Extra: Irradiation area


32

Repeatability test of alignment & automatic connectors successful design approved

In 2011: Need 1 base table and 3 mobile tables Installation base table planned week 19, mobile tables

under construction, ready for first user

Prototypes & Tests

Signals connector

Base table with alignment plug-ins

Alignment plug-ins Waterconnector

Ans Pardons

Extra: Operation


33 Activation dose rate after 1 user test

Ans Pardons

Extra: Operation


34 Users

Parameter ValueExperiments in 2011 ~3Maximum intensity per experiment

1×1015 protons<30 full intensity pulses

Waiting time after experiment for de-installation

≥ 2 weeks

Access during experiment (except urgent interventions)

no

Control of experiment and data taking

remote

Maximum intensity per year <<1×1016 protons

Warning! Non-contractual test object

images. Pictures may differ from actual

product(a lot).

• First: short cool-down period before dismounting

• Then: taken out to surface or moved to underground downstream cool-down area

Extra: Operation35 Measures because of radiation dose rates

Alignment at surface on pre-aligned base table Remote handling of test stand, crane operator in TJ7 Access to TJ7 before beam, rack for tests of signals,

services, motorisation, observation equipment No access to TNC (exception only with RP approval) Cool-down area for equipment downstream TNC Re-use of mobile tables only if negligible dose rate

TJ7TNC

Bef

ore

beam

Afte

r bea

mE

nd-o

f-yea

r sh

ut-d

own Possible (RP approval) to

intervene in TNC for “upgrade” of user’s services, limited repair works, ...

Ans Pardons

Extra: Operation


36 Future users

Future users already interested in using HiRadMat Collimator phase 2 (prototyping work) LHC beam dump entrance window robustness Studies of protection devices and windows (TE-ABT) Vacuum chamber coatings for electron cloud mitigation R2E teams - irradiation facility – radiation damage BLM developments LARP Rotatable Collimator Robustness Test (SLAC) Radiation tolerance tests (EN-STI) ISOLDE – Target and Ion Source Development

Extra beamline


37

Christoph Hessler

Beam

25 m

Experimental area

TI 2

TT60

TT66

Christoph Hessler38

22.03.2011

Beam Line Status (March 2011)Beam

25 m

Experimental area

TI 2

TT60

TT66

TT60 upstream chicane:

• All magnets installed and aligned.• Vacuum system installed and under

vacuum.• TT60 back in operation.

Christoph Hessler39

22.03.2011


25 m

Experimental area

TI 2

TT60

TT66

TI 2:• TBSE and additional BPMs installed.• Re-installation completed and under vacuum.• TI 2 back in operation.

Christoph Hessler40

22.03.2011


25 m

Experimental area

TI 2

TT60

TT66TT66 in TCC6:

Installation completed in TCC6:• Magnets/BI/vacuum system installed. • Cables pulled and connected.• Vacuum: Leak tested up to

QTLF.660300 at the end of TCC6.

Christoph Hessler41

22.03.2011


25 m

Experimental area

TI 2

TT60

TT66

Christoph Hessler42

22.03.2011


25 m

Experimental area

TI 2

TT60

TT66

TT66 in TJ7/TNC:• All magnets and most BI installed

(only last BTV and BPKG missing).• Alignment work

almost completed.• Installation of

vacuum system on-going.

• To be under vacuum at end of next TS.

hi gh rad iation to mat erials

Documents