hildren’s trust oard 15 october 2018, 15:00 16:30...2018/10/15 · children's trust...

CHILDREN’S TRUST BOARD 15 October 2018, 15:00 – 16:30

Present:

Cllr Nicola Greene (Chair) Cabinet Member for Education & Children’s Services

Cllr Jane Kelly Cabinet Member Partnerships, Regeneration and Public Health

Jane Portman Managing Director, BBC

Neil Goddard Service Director, Community Learning & Commissioning Services, BBC

Kay Errington Acting Service Director, Children Young People & Families, BBC

Sue Ross Director – Adults and Children, BBC

Michael Masterman Independent Reviewing Officer, BBC

Jan Masterman Service Manager – Permanence Planning, BBC

Katherine Harvey Service Director – Children, Young People & Families, DHC

Karen Wood Joint Commissioning Manager, Community Learning & Commissioning, BBC

Debra Jones Strategic Commissioner, Community Learning & Commissioning

William Barnwell Programme Lead – Primary and Community Care Directorate

Claire Davies Senior Management Information Officer, Community Learning & Commissioning, BBC

Jo Wilson Public Health Dorset

Matt Moyes Business Support, BBC

Apologies Patricia Reid Director of Nursing

Rachel Gravett Children’s Commissioner, BBC

Ian Ison Youth Service Operational Manager, Dorset Police

Chris Naughton Dorset Police

Rebecca Jones Locality Manager, Dorset Healthcare

Yvonne Surman Head of Youth Services, Dorset Police

Anne Salter Strategic Partnerships and Performance Manager, DCC

Sam Crowe Assistant Director of Public Health

Penny Earney Dorset CCG

Emma-Seria-Walker Deputy Director Review, Design and Delivery, CCG

Eugine Yafale Bournemouth Locality Director, DHUFT

ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTION

1 Apologies: as shown above.

2 Minutes of last meeting and matters arising

• Minutes of the last board meeting were approved by all.

3 LGR and Children’s Trust arrangements

• DJ gave a summarised overview of paper.

• BBC and BoP have retained Children’s Trust Partnerships. DCC have implemented a strategic alliance.

• At the next board meeting in February 2019, it may be known who the Director of Children’s Services for BCP will be. Future plans for CTB and LSCB will then require decision.

• It was questioned whether holding discussions in February 2019 was enough lead time for putting things in place ahead of the commencement of the BCP authority in April 2019. Following discussion, the future of Children’s Trust Board meetings would depend on LSCB arrangements. CTB and LSCB agendas are linked.

4 Progress report – Quarterly Performance Management Indicators

• NG gave an overview of the notable points from the indicators:

• 1.3 low birth weight of term babies – 3.32% of all live births at term had a low birth weight, which was statically lower that national average 2.79%.

• 1.5 KS2 – End of KS2 combined reading, writing and mathematics results have risen by 3% and remain above national average. BBC had the best academic outcomes in the Southwest.

• 1.12 KS2 disadvantaged pupils – End of KS2 combined reading, writing and mathematics were positive and BBC are the best in the South West region.

• CT 1.18 Permanent exclusions from school – the figure is high and increasing which is of particular concern. Work is continuing with schools to reduce this, and NG confirmed that accountability rests with the schools. Heads of school meet at panel and BBC also attend, it was too early to say if work already undertaken had had an impact yet.

• 2.6 conception rates per 1,000 women aged 15-17 – the increase would be monitored. KH queried the supporting commentary of this indicator and felt that the current outlook for sexual health services and outreach work was positive. DJ stated this text was provided by the service manager in June. CD to liaise with the service manager to confirm.

• CT 2.11c – Service Manager commentary on rate of LAC would be sought by CD and fed back.

CD CD

5 Ofsted ILACS updates and actions

• KE explained that following the inspection between 16 and 27th July 2018, the overall judgement received from Ofsted was ‘requires improvement’. However positive feedback was received for the most disadvantaged children’s services. Improvement was required for service provisions for lesser disadvantaged children, particularly around timeliness and consistency of response.

• SR commented that the primary focus of the Ofsted inspection was around practice of social care, not partnership arrangements.

• The Post Inspection Improvement Plan will be shared on Biz, it will not be confidential and can be distributed as required. The wider staff within Children’s Social Care have been consulted regarding the plan.

• The Improvement Plan will require cross-referencing with performance reports and this will be done by November for ongoing monitoring.

• The Plan will be monitored by an improvement board that meets fortnightly and is chaired by Cllr Green.

• Cllr Wakefield would like to meet with PIIP board members and KE asked if the Cllr could join the board as a scrutiny member. Cllr Green felt that with LGR upcoming and the associated changes, this may not be suitable at the current time.

• JP commented that the plan was thorough, focussed and good quality. Any scrutiny members would require clarity around the role are they are performing at the board and would not want their existing roles to be compromised.

• Ofsted are not required to sign off on any actions or progress made against their recommendations.

• As a general point, it was highlighted that knowledge sharing with BoP has been very beneficial in terms of sharing best practice and improving weaknesses.

6 Adverse Childhood Experience (Presentation)

• KW delivered the presentation to the Board.

• Following the presentation, KW requested resources to carry out a ‘deep dive’ to obtain more intelligence around identifying which services could have been put in place previously at the time when young persons experienced ACE’s and the services that would be put in place now for a young person. The Board agreed that this would be beneficial.

• A group of headteachers have requested a presentation on the background information of ACE’s to educate their staff. Sarah Sanford would attend to deliver this.

• KW confirmed every agency in Wales now has to report ACE’s, Scotland are following this and England are lagging behind with screening tools/processes. Current screening in England is not reported or evidence-based.

7 Signs of Safety

• MM joined the meeting to brief the Board on progress of the implementation of Signs of Safety practice framework.

• Roll-out of training across Bournemouth and Poole has been progressing since April and a further 2-day training course has been delivered since May. To date, approximately 150 staff have been trained and 300 staff had undertaken the 2-day training sessions offered.

• Every training event held has been oversubscribed with approx. 30 attendees on each session. The next stage of the training process will be to identify practice champions.

• Cllr Green asked if there were any barriers for the roll out. MM stated training was very well attended however confidence of staff using the framework may be an issue following the training.

• Moving forward, developing the in-house capacity to deliver the training to also include 3rd sector partners was something that would be very beneficial.

8 Mosaic implementation update

• NG gave update. Mosaic will go-live next week, w/c 22 October.

• It will support both Adults’ and Children’s services and both will be implemented to go-live at the same time.

• Significant support has been put together for staff. Staff who have completed system training have welcomed the new system and given positive feedback.

• In the first instance, Mosaic will be a replacement for Raise but will offer enhanced features e.g. Signs of Safety (SOS) functionality.

• It was noted that DCC and CBC use the Mosaic system whereas BoP use Care Director. The new authority will use two systems, Mosaic (Bournemouth version) and Care Director.

9 Out of Hours Service update

• JM joined the meeting and summarised the salient points of the paper.

• It was confirmed the new service would be ready to go-live on 5 November.

• Training for staff on the telecare service is commencing this week. This is mainly to get the Children’s element trained-up, as staff that will be call handling were previously based within the Adult service.

FOR INFORMATION / CONSULTATION

10 Children & Young People Plan

• No items of discussion.

Papers All papers from today’s meeting to be made available on the Children Trust Website. Date of next meeting: 4th Feb 2018.

Children's Trust Quarterly Performance Management Indicators

Q P MQuarter 2

2018/2019

Meeting Date: 15th October 2018

Management Information Team

Community Learning & Commissioning

29 October 2018

Presented by: Neil Goddard

Produced by: Samantha Ballantine

Report Produced:

1.1 - Breastfeeding

Nov 2017 - Nov 2018 (TBC)

1.3 - Low Birth Weight

Feb 2018 - Feb 2019

1.4 - Foundation Stage Good Level

of Development

Jul 2018 - Jul 2019

1.5 - Key Stage 2 Attainment

Oct 2018 (Prov)

- Dec 2018 (Revised)

1.6 - GCSEs - Progress 8

Feb 2018 (Val) - Oct 2018 (Prov)

1.8 - Childcare and EY settings

Rated as Good or Above

Jul 2018 - Oct 2018

1.9 - Pupils attending Schools Rated

Good or Above

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

1.10 - NEET & Not Known

Apr 2018 - Jun 2018

1.12 - Disadvantaged

KS2 RWM &

KS4 GCSE 4-9 in Eng&Maths

Feb 2018 - Dec 2018

1.18 - Exclusions

Nov 2017 - Nov 2019

2.6 - Under 18

Conception Rate

Jun 2018 - Mar 2019

2.7 - 1st Time Entrants to Youth

Justice System

Aug 2018 - Nov 2018

2.8 - Offending By LAC

May 2018 - Apr 2019

2.9 - Child Sexual Exploitation

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

2.11a - CIN where case is open

longer than 6 months

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

2.11b - Rate of CPP

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

2.11c - Rate of LAC

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

2.13 - Single Assessments

completed in 45 Working Days

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

3.3 - Emotional well-being of LAC

Mar 2018 - Mar 2019

3.5 - Non-Statutory Homeless

Households

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

3.6 - LAC in Higher Education

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

3.7 - Care Leavers - Suitable

Accommodation

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

3.8 - Care Leavers Education,

Employment and Training

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

3.9 - Domestic Abuse Notifications

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

3.10 - Substance Misuse

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019

3.11 - CAMHS

Jul 2018 - Oct 2018

3.12 - Re-offending by Young

People who have re-offended

Aug 2018 - Nov 2018 (TBC)

3.13 Custodial Sentences of the

10-17 year old pop

Aug 2018 - Nov 2018

RED - 4 - 22%

Amber - 5 - 28%

Green - 9 - 50%

Key

Section 1 Indicators

Section 2 Indicators

Section 3 Indicators Tackling inequalities - improving life chances

Improving prospects - reaching potential

Information collected for monitoring only. No targets set. Not RAG rated

Keeping safe and well - enjoying good physical and mental health, and living healthy lifestyle

Children's Trust Performance Management Indicators


Note: First date indicates when the last data was received, second date indicate when next data expected.

Serious challenge, remedial action required, out of tolerance

Some challenges, mitigating action in place, within tolerance

On Target

Page 2 of 31

Date Version Purpose

20-Sep-17 17-18 Quarter 1 V12 Changes to Summary page on 2.11a following CT Board

04-Oct-17 17-18 Quarter 2 V1 Added new National figure to 3.6

18-Oct-17 17-18 Quarter 2 V2 Reduced data set

02-Nov-17 17-18 Quarter 2 V2 Update commentary and benchmarking 1.7, 2.11a, 2.11b

06-Nov-17 17-18 Quarter 2 V3 Update data & commentary on 3.11

27-Nov-17 17-18 Quarter 2 V4 Updated data 1.9, 2.11c, 2.13, 3.9. 1.9 comments

30-Nov-17 17-18 Quarter 2 V5 Updated 3.9 comments, 3.12, 3.13 Data & Comments

06-Dec-17 17-18 Quarter 2 V6 Updated 1.4, 3.10, 3.12, 1.6. 1.10 & 1.11 combined

12-Dec-17 17-18 Quarter 2 V7Updated 1.4 comments, 1.1, 1.5, 1.10, 3.6, 3.7,3.8 data & comments.

Summary sheet.

12-Dec-17 17-18 Quarter 2 V8 Printed for Children's Trust Board 19/12/2017.

19-Dec-17 17-18 Quarter 2 V9 Updated PM to Jo Wilson on 1.1 & 1.3.

25-Jan-18 17-18 Quarter 2 V10 Updated hyperlinks on Summary

01-Feb-18 17-18 Quarter 3 V1 New SS for Q3 17/18

07-Feb-18 17-18 Quarter 3 V1 Updated 2.11c, 3.8, 3.11

08-Feb-18 17-18 Quarter 3 V1 Updated 2.11a, 2.11b, 2.13, 3.7, 1.10

09-Feb-18 17-18 Quarter 3 V1 Updated 2.9, 3.5b

13-Feb-18 17-18 Quarter 3 V1 Updated 3.9, 3.10, 1.8

14-Feb-18 17-18 Quarter 3 V1 Updated 3.3

20-Feb-18 17-18 Quarter 3 V1 Updated 1.5, 1.6, 1.9, 1.12, 1.3

21-Feb-18 17-18 Quarter 3 V1 Updated 3.11 CAHMS to blue as no rag and target required

06-Mar-18 17-18 Quarter 3 V1

Updated Commentary for 3.6, updated indicators for 2.7, 2.8, 3.12 - no

change to 3.13

24-May-18 17-18 Quarter 4 V1 Updated 1.8, 1.9, 2.8,2.9, 3.9, 3.10

24-May-18 17-18 Quarter 4 V1No updates available from 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.12, 1.18, 2.7, 3.12, 3.13

04-Jun-18 17-18 Quarter 4 V1 Updated 1.10, 2.6, 2.11b, 2.11c, 2.13, 3.6, 3.7

05-Jun-18 17-18 Quarter 4 V1 Updated 3.8, 3.11

06-Jun-18 17-18 Quarter 4 V1 Updated 2.11a

07-Jun-18 17-18 Quarter 4 V1 Updated 2.6 - commentary Geraint Griffiths

11-Jun-18 17-18 Quarter 4 V1 Commentary provided for 2.11a by Mike Felstead

12-Jun-18 17-18 Quarter 4 V1 Updated 2.7, 2.8, 3.12

04-Jul-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1 Updated 3.10, 1.10, 3.5b

05-Jul-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1 Updated 3.9

12-Jul-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1 Updated 1.5, 1.6, 1.9, 1.12 and 1.18

19-Jul-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1

Updated 1.1,1.3 (statistical neighbour, national ranking and quartile

banding.

23-Jul-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1 Updated 1.4,1.8 data - awaiting commentary from Jonathan Payne

24-Jul-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1

Updated 3.13, no updates to 2.7,2.8 and 3.12, 3.11 CAMHS page amended

to show new data and an explanation of the way the data collection has

changed.

26-Jul-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1 Updated 2.9 CSE Risk

14-Aug-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1 Updated indicators 2.11a, 2.11b, 2.11c, 2.13, 3.6, 3.8

14-Aug-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1 No update available to 3.3

14-Aug-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1

Updated 3.11 to show only the Team result and no reference to tier.

Explanation provided and commentary added from Hayley Stacey.

11-Sep-18 18-19 Quarter 1 V1 2.7,3.12 and 3.13 updated, 2.8 does not have an update

05-Oct-18 18-19 Quarter 2 V1 1.5, 1.10, 2.9, 3.10 updated

08-Oct-18 18-19 Quarter 2 V1 2.11a,2.11b, 2.11c, 2.13, 3.6, 3.7, 3.9 updated

08-Oct-18 18-19 Quarter 2 V1 No updates to - 1.1,1.3,1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 1.12, 1.18, 2.6, 3.3, 3.5

10-Oct-18 18-19 Quarter 2 V3 Update to 3.5b and amendment to front tiles

29-Oct-18 18-19 Quarter 2 V4Updated chart & commentary for 2.11c & commentary 2.6, 2.13, 3.7 & 3.8

30-Oct-18 18-19 Quarter 2 V4 2.11a, 2.11b, 3.6 commentary updated

Page 3 of 31

Performance Manager 58.1

Data Manager To Exceed 44.4

Unit of Measure

Good Performance is 7

Frequency A

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

58.1 No sig. change Green



Performance Manager Comments:

Benchmarking Data:

The 2015/16 and 2016/17 data have been obtained via a new interim reporting system and have been published as 'experimental statistics' which

are undergoing evaluation and development. They are not comparable with previous years' data.

2016/17 figures show that 58.1% of infants who were due a check were totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks after birth. This compares

with 44.4% nationally. The difference between the local and national figures is statistically sigificant (i.e. local rates are significantly better).

There are no updates to this indicator - 04/10/2018 - Anne Scott

Change Management Overview: 19 July 2018

RAG 03 February 2016

Data 19 July 2018 (Statistical neighbour, latest national rank and quartile banding updated)

Comments 29 November 2017

2016/17 44.4 42.2

2015/16 43.2 41.0

2014/15 43.8 41.6

Target Intervention

Annual Quartile Banding

Nov-17

Nov-18 TBC

High Latest National Rank



1.1 Breastfeeding prevalence at 6-8 weeks after birth.

This data is : Validated

Jo Wilson Annual Actual 2016/17

Anne Scott Target 2016/17

Percentage

58.155.056.2

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

2016/172015/162014/15

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Breastfeeding prevalence at 6-8 weeks after birth Actual

Target

Intervention

56.2 55.0 58.1

43.8 43.2 44.442.6 44.8 46.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2014/15 2015/16 2016/17

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Breastfeeding prevalence at 6-8 weeks after birth

Bournemouth

National

Statistical Neighbour

Hig

he

r is B

ette

r

Page 4 of 31


Data Manager To not exceed 2.79

Unit of Measure


Frequency D

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

3.32 Improving Red

4.15 Declining Red

2.94 No sig. change Amber


Benchmarking Data:

2016 validated figures show 3.32% of all live births at term had a low birth weight. This compares with 2.79% nationally.

The difference between the local and national percentages in 2016 was not statistically significant. In addition, there was no statistically significant

change in the local percentage between 2015 and 2016.

There are no updates to this indicator - 04/10/2018 - Anne Scott


RAG 11 May 2017

Data 19 July 2018 (Statistical neighbour, latest national rank and quartile banding)

Comments 20 February 2018

2016 2.79 3.07

2015 2.77 3.05

2014 2.86 3.15

Target Intervention


Feb-18

Feb-19

Low Latest National Rank



1.3 Low birth weight of term babies


Jo Wilson Annual Actual 2016

Anne Scott Target 2016

Percentage

3.324.15

2.94

0

1

2

3

4

5

201620152014

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Low birth weight of term babies Actual

Target

Intervention

2.94

4.153.32

2.86 2.77 2.792.56 2.69 2.65

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

2014 2015 2016

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Low birth weight of term babies

Bournemouth

National


Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 5 of 31

Performance Manager 75.9Data Manager 71.0

Unit of Measure


Frequency A

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

75.9 Improving Green


72 Stable Green71.7 Improving Green


Benchmarking Data:

Bournemouth's percentage of pupils achieving a good level of development has risen by approximately 1%. This remains above National and South

West percentage.

Kay Errington

Dawn Simpson

Percentage

High

Annual (Academic Year)

Oct-18

Nov-19

Annual Actual 2017/18

Target 2017/18

Latest National Rank

Quartile Banding

2015/16

2014/15

66



1.4 - Attainment of pupils at foundation stage (based on the % of pupils achieving a good level of development at foundation stage).

2016/17

Target

69


2017/18 71 58.4

Change Management Overview:

21 October 2015

30 October 2018

26 July 2018 - Commentary provided by Jonathan Payne

RAG

Data

Comments

30 October 2018

60

Intervention

59.4

54.0

46.8

75.974.77271.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2017/182016/172015/162014/15

Pe

rce

nta

ge

% of pupils achieving a good level of development at foundation stage Actual

Target

Intervention

71.7 7274.7 75.9

66.369.3 70.7 71.5

68.270.8 71.9 72.3

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

74

76

78

2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18

Pe

rce

nta

ge

% of pupils achieving a good level of development at foundation stage

Bournemouth

National


Hig

he

r is B

ette

r

Page 6 of 31

Performance Manager 66%Data Manager 64%

Unit of Measure


Frequency B

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

66.0% Improving Green

63.0% Improving Green54.0% N/A


Benchmarking Data:

End of KS2 combined reading, writing and mathematics results have risen by 3% in 2018 and remain above national. This 66% represents the

proportion of pupils who achieved a scaled score of 100 or more in the reading and maths tests as well as a teacher assessment of ‘working at the

expected standard’ or above in writing.

For individual subjects, test outcomes have also risen.

Reading 75%, +4% since 2017, remains in line with the national result.

Writing TA 81% +1% since 2017, is 3% higher than the national result.

Grammar, punctuation and spelling (GPS) test results 78% +1% since 2017, remains in line with the national result.

Maths 78% +1% since 2017, is 2% higher than the national result.

Change Management Overview: 05 October 2018RAG 07 July 2016Data 05 October 2018Comments 05 October 2018

2017/18 64.0% N/A

2016/17 62.0% N/A

2015/16 53.0% N/A

National Intervention

Annual (Academic Year) Quartile Banding

Oct-18

Dec-18 (revised)




1.5 - % pupils achieving the expected standard across reading, writing and mathematics at end of Key Stage 2

This data is : Provisional

Neil Goddard Annual Actual 2017/18

Jane Trevett National 2017/18

Percentage

66.0%63.0%54.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

2017/182016/172015/16

Pe

rce

nta

ge

% pupils achieving the expected standard across reading, writing and mathematics at end of KS2

Actual

National

54.0%63.0% 66.0%

53.0%62.0% 64.0%

52.1%61.7% 61.8%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

2015/16 2016/17 2017/18

Pe

rce

nta

ge

% pupils achieving the expected standard across reading, writing and mathematics at end of Key Stage 2

Bournemouth

National


Hig

he

r is

Page 7 of 31

Performance Manager -0.03Data Manager -0.03

Unit of Measure


Frequency B

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

-0.03 Declining Green

-0.01 N/A Green


Benchmarking Data:

Progress 8 results indicate that Bournemouth schools achieved a score of -0.03, 0.02 point below last year’s score. Bournemouth’s Progress 8 score is the same as

the National average and is 0.06 points above its Statistical Neighbours (-0.09). Although, there has been a slight decline in the Progress 8 score, the score is at our

target score and remains above the intervention score.

There are no updates to this indicator - 04/10/2018 - Jane Trevett

Change Management Overview: 20 February 2018


Data 20 February 2018

Comments 20 February 2018 - Commentary provided by Rina Mistry

2016/17 -0.03 -0.5

2015/16 -0.03 -0.5

N/A

Target Intervention

Annual (Academic Year) Quartile Banding

Feb-18

Oct-18 (Provisional)




1.6 - Progress 8 (excluding Special Schools) – Schools progress score across 8 GCSE subjects


Caroline Foster Annual Actual 2016/7

Jane Trevett Target 2016/17

Score

-0.03-0.01

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

2016/172015/16

Sco

re

Progress 8 – Schools progress score across 8 subjects

Actual

Target

Intervention

-0.01 -0.03-0.03 -0.03

-0.09 -0.09

-0.11

-0.09

-0.07

-0.05

-0.03

-0.01

0.01

N/A 2015/16 2016/17

Sco

re

Progress 8 – Schools progress score across 8 subjects

Bournemouth

National (State Funded)


Hig

he

r is B

ette

r

Page 8 of 31


Unit of Measure

Good Performance is N/A

Frequency N/A

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG


92.9 Improving Amber

91.5 Declining Amber91.9 Stable Amber


Benchmarking Data:

Strategies to both sustain providers at Good or Outstanding judgements are in place and help support stable consistency across Early Years settings. Percentage

of Good and Outstanding has risen in the last term as a result of targetted intervention for providers, judged Requires Improvement or Inadequate, that have now

received an Ofsted inspection.

There are no updates to this indicator - 04/10/2018


RAG 23 July 2018

Termly Quartile Banding

Jul-18

Oct-18




As at Summer 2018 93.0 83.7

As At Winter beginning of 2018 93.0 83.7

As At End Summer 2017 93.0 83.7

Target Intervention

As at Spring 2018 93.0 83.7

Data 23 July 2018

Comments 26 July 2018 - Commentary provided by Jonathan Payne

Target

Percentage

Dawn Simpson

Kay Errington Actual - Summer 2018

1.8 % of childcare and early years settings rated good or outstanding by OfSted.


96.992.991.591.9

75

80

85

90

95

100

As at Summer 2018As at Spring 2018As At Winter beginning of 2018As At End Summer 2017

Pe

rce

nta

ge

The percentage of childcare and early years settings rated good or outstanding by OfSted(based on a snapshot at the end of the term)

Actual

Target

Intervention

91.9 91.592.9

96.9

93 93 93 93

88

90

92

94

96

98

As At End Summer 2017 As At Winter beginning of 2018 As at Spring 2018 As at Summer 2018

Pe

rce

nta

ge

The percentage of childcare and early years settings rated good or outstanding by OfSted(based on a snapshot at the end of the term)

Bournemouth

National


Hig

he

r is B

ette

r

Page 9 of 31

Performance Manager 91.0Data Manager N/A

Unit of Measure


Frequency N/A

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

91.0 Decline Green

91.9 Stable Green

93.3 Stable Green93.3 Improving Green93.3 Stable Green


Benchmarking Data:

This data is : Final

Neil Goddard Actual Q2 - 2018/19

Jane Trevett



1.9 - % of pupils attending schools rated as good or outstanding by Ofsted

Target Q2 2018/19

Percentage

Quarterly Quartile Banding

Oct-18


Jan-19

As at 1 Oct 2018 86.0 N/A

As at 24 April 2018 86.4 N/A

As at 9 Oct 2017 87.5 N/A

National Comparator

As at 9 July 2018 86.2 N/A

Data 05 October 2018Comments 05 October 2018

Data shown is from Watchsted. As at 1 October 2018, 91% of Bournemouth pupils are in good or better schools, National is 86%. Lastest figures now

rank Bournemouth 39th overall. Bournemouth LA is the 3rd highest performing Local Authority among its statistical neighbours where the average is

88%.

The proportion of pupils in good or better secondary schools remains at 91.9%, national is 82.2%, ranking Bournemouth 40th overall and 2nd highest

among its statistical neighbours where the average is 84.2%.

The proportion of pupils in good or better primary schools is 90.3% and remains higher than National 88.4%. Bournemouth ranks 69th nationally

which has fallen from 61st last time but is the 4th highest performing Local Authority among its statistical neighbours.

Change Management Overview: 05 October 2018RAG 03 February 2016

As at 8 Feb 2018 86.9 N/A

91.091.993.393.393.3

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

As at 1 Oct 2018As at 9 July 2018As at 24 April 2018As at 8 Feb 2018As at 9 Oct 2017

Pe

rce

nta

ge

% of pupils attending schools rated as good or outstanding by Ofsted Actual

NationalComparator

93.3 93.3 91.9 91.086.9 86.4 86.2 86.085.5 85.0 84.1

88.0

75

80

85

90

95

100

As at 8 Feb 2018 As at 24 April 2018 As at 9 July 2018 As at 1 Oct 2018

Pe

rce

nta

ge

% of pupils attending schools rated as good or outstanding by Ofsted

Bournemouth

National


Hig

he

r is B

ette

r

Page 10 of 31

Performance Manager 11.8Data Manager

Unit of Measure

Good Performance is not available

Frequency not available

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

11.8 Declining

5.7 Declining Amber

5.4 Improving Green9.2 Declining Green

12 June 2017


Benchmarking Data:

Data 04 October 2018

Comments 04 October 2018

Please note: NEETs and Not Knowns are now being combined onto one Indicator in line with other reports.

Comparing Q1 2018/19 combined NEETs and Not knowns data to Q4 2017/18 it can be seen that proportions have remained static at 5.7%. In Q1

2018/19 Bournemouth proportions are 1ppt above England (5.6%) and 3 ppt above Statistical Neighbour (5.4%) averages, however significantly

below the South West average of 6.5%. It is imperative to note that in Quarter 2, courses are coming to an end and it the last term of the academic

year, therefore it is anticipated that the proportions of NEETs and Not Knowns will increase.

I can confirm that the figure for Bournemouth is 11.8%. This is a provisional figure as final figures are not due to be submitted until Oct 31st. Figures

are unavailable for National and SN until November 2018 when the final results will be released. - Rina Mistry

Change Management Overview: 04 October 2018

RAG 04 June 2018

Comparing the 2014/15 NEETs figure with 2013/14, it can be seen that the proportion of NEETs have reduced and are now on target. During 2013/14 the increase in

Q2 Jul - Sep 2018

Q4 Jan - Mar 2018 8.2 9.0

Q3 Oct - Dec 2017 25.2 27.7

Target Intervention

Q1 Apr - Jun 2018 5.4 5.9


Oct-18

Nov-18 (validated)




1.10 - Percentage of 16 - 17 year olds who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) or activity is unknown

This data is : ProvisionalCaroline Foster Quarterly Actual 2018/19

Percentage

Rina Mistry Quarterly Target 2018/19

11.85.75.49.2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Q2 Jul - Sep 2018Q1 Apr - Jun 2018Q4 Jan - Mar 2018Q3 Oct - Dec 2017

Pe

rce

nta

ge

% of 16 - 17 year olds who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) or activity is unknown

Actual

Target

Intervention

9.25.4 5.7

11.817.9

10.35.6

25.2

8.2 5.40.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Q3 Oct - Dec 2017 Q4 Jan - Mar 2018 Q1 Apr - Jun 2018 Q2 Jul - Sep 2018

Pe

rce

nta

ge

% of young people aged 16-18 not in education, employment or training.

Bournemouth

National


Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 11 of 31


Unit of Measure


Frequency B

Last Updated

Next Available Data

Actual National ComparisonDirection of

TravelRAG




Benchmarking Data:

Dec-18




Percentage

Target 2016/17Jane Trevett

Neil Goddard Annual Actual 2016/17

Quartile Banding

2015/16 39.0 N/A

Feb-18

1.12 - % of disadvantaged pupils achieving the ‘expected standard’ or better at the end of KS2 in Reading, Writing and Mathematics.


Annual (Academic Year)

Data

Results for group of disadvantaged pupils are 19% lower than for other pupils although this is 2% higher than results for the equivalent national group, significantly

it is 4% higher than statistical neighbours and Bournemouth are the best in the South West region. The largest subject gap is in the reading test. Schools need to be

encouraged to fully evaluate the impact of their use of the Pupil Premium. They should ensure that all pupils in the disadvantaged group have access to support

that reduces gaps in achievement in writing and maths as well as reading and promotes individual pupil achievement across all 3 aspects of reading, writing and

maths.


Intervention

2016/17 48.0


RAG

N/A

20 February 2018 - commentary provided by Judith O'Hare

20 February 2018

13 February 2017

Comments

50.040.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

2016/172015/16

Pe

rce

nta

ge

% of disadvantaged pupils achieving the ‘expected standard’ or better at the end of KS2 in Reading, Writing and Mathematics. Actual

NationalComparison

40.050.0

39.048.0

37.145.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2015/16 2016/17

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Percentage of disadvantaged pupils achieving the ‘expected standard’ or better at the end of KS2 in Reading, Writing and Mathematics

Bournemouth

National


Page 12 of 31

Performance Manager 0.00Data Manager 0.37Unit of Measure


Frequency N/A

Last Updated

Next Available Data

Primary ActualDirection of Travel

PrimaryRAG

0.00 Improving N/A

0.08 Declining N/A0.03 N/A


Benchmarking Data:



Nov-17

CT 1.18 - Permanent Exclusions from school as a percentage of the school population

This data is : Final

Geraint Griffiths Actual Q2 2017/18 Primary

Jane Trevett Actual Q2 2017/18 Secondary & AT

Percentage



Nov-18

Secondary & All Through

Actual

Direction of Travel

Secondary

Half Terms 1-6 2016/17 0.37 Declining

Half Terms 1-6 2015/16 0.26 Declining

Half Terms 1-6 2014/15 0.22

Whilst the rate of permanent exclusion from primary settings is low, Bournemouth is experiencing a significant rise in the number of permanent

exclusions from secondary settings. Although this is a national trend, the current rate of permanent exclusion and the rate of increase is significantly

higher than the national rate and that of statistical neighbours. The Local Authority is working closely with Academies and alternative education

providers to address the rise in permanent exclusions and reduce the number of pupils being place in alternative provision. - There are no changes to

this indicator - Jane Trevett 04/10/2018

Data Observations by MI Team:

Primary exclusions saw a slight increase in 15/16 but provisional data shows this dropping to zero in 16/17.

Secondary remains much higher and provisional data shows it peaking at 0.37% for 16/17, which is a significant increase on previous years.


Change Management Overview: 22 November 2017

RAG 15 November 2017

Data 20 November 2017

Comments 22 November 2017

0.37

0.260.22

0.000.080.030.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

Half Terms 1-6 2016/17Half Terms 1-6 2015/16Half Terms 1-6 2014/15

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Permanent Exclusions from school as a percentage of the school population(Provisional data)

Secondary & AllThrough Actual

Primary Actual

0.060.02 0.02 0.020.02 0.02 0.03

0.210.19

0.24

0.130.15

0.17

0.11

0.17 0.16

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Permanent Exclusions from school as a percentage of the school population(Validated data) Primary

Bournemouth

Primary National

Primary StatisticalNeighbour

Secondary & ATBournemouth

Secondary & AT National

Secondary & ATStatistical Neighbour

Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 13 of 31


Unit of Measure


Frequency C

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

22.7 Declining Red



Benchmarking Data:

The increase in the rate of teenage conceptions in 2016, equates to an increase from 52 conceptions in 2015 to 55 in 2016. It should be also viewed

in the historic context of a reduction in the rate from 41.0 in 2011. The latest data available (June 2017) indicates that the rate has decreased to an

estimated 19.6. The low numbers involved, means that the rate is prone to fluctuation and slight increase in the 2016 rate is not considered

significant. Early Help and Sexual Health teams are meeting to review existing provision and ensure appropriate services are accessible to those who

require them, so that the downward trend in the conception rate continues.


RAG Baseline Entered


Oct-18

Mar-19




Data 07 June 2018

Comments 18 October 2018 - commentary provided by Geraint Griffiths

2016 18.8 21.6

2015 20.8 23.9

2014 22.8 26.2

Target Intervention

Rate per 1,000 woman aged 15-17

2.6 - Conception rate per 1,000 woman aged 15-17


Geraint Griffiths Actual 2016

Claire Davies Target 2016

22.720.522.3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

201620152014

Rat

e P

er

1,0

00

Conception rate per 1,000 woman aged 15-17 Actual

Target

Intervention

22.3 20.5 22.722.8 20.8 18.8

25.322.0 21.7

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2014 2015 2016

Rat

e P

er

1,0

00

Conception rate per 1,000 woman aged 15-17

Bournemouth

National


Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 14 of 31

Performance Manager 369

Data Manager 367

Unit of Measure


Frequency C

Last Updated A.K.A. Corp Plan AC5h

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

369 Improving Amber

412 Declining Red

390 Declining Green375 Stable Green


Benchmarking Data:

2.7 - The rate of first time entrants into the youth justice system per 100,000 of 10-17 year olds.


David Webb

Sharon Maistre-Welsh

Rate per 100,000 of 10-17 year old population

Actual Q1 2018-19

Target March 2019

Q1 2018-19 367

Q4 2017-18 367

Q2 2017-18

390

390

Q3 2017-18

Target Intervention

Data 12 September 2018

Comments 12 September 2018

Dorset Combined Youth Offending Service is a Pan Dorset Service covering the Bournemouth, Poole and Dorset Local Authority areas. The figures

quoted here are for Bournemouth only, however the National Rank and Quartile banding relate to the Pan Dorset service as a whole.

In real terms, the number of first time entrants has remained fairly stable, with only fairly minor fluctuations, since December 2016. In the 12 months

to March 2018, there were 51 first time entrants in Bournemouth, just two more than there were during the same period 12 months previously.

Change Management Overview: 12 September 2018

RAG 12 September 2018


Aug-18

Nov-18




369

412

390375

340

360

380

400

420

Q1 2018-19Q4 2017-18Q3 2017-18Q2 2017-18

Rat

e P

er

10

0,0

00

The rate of first time entrants into the youth justice system(rolling year 12 months to end of quarter)

Actual

Target

Intervention

375.0 390.0 412.0369.0

311.0 301.0 290.0 273.0301.0 298.0 290.0 274.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

Q2 2017-18 Q3 2017-18 Q4 2017-18 Q1 2018-19

Rat

e P

er

10

0,0

00

The rate of first time entrants into the youth justice system(rolling year April 18 - Mar 19)

Bournemouth

National


Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 15 of 31

Performance Manager 5.2Data Manager

Unit of Measure

Good Performance is -

Frequency -

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

5.2 Declining Green

5.0 Declining Green

4.0 Stable Green4.0 Improving Green


Benchmarking Data:

This indicator only includes children who have been Looked After for 12 months or more, and as such should not be seen as a measure of all LAC

offending.

The percentage of Bournemouth Children Looked After for 12 + months subject to a conviction, Youth Caution or Youth Conditional Caution during

2018 increased by 0.2 to 5.2%. These figures have not yet been published and should be regarded as provisional. National and regional figures will be

available on publication.

The next update to this indicator will not be available until after December 2018 - Sharon Maistre-Welsh 12/09/2018

Change Management Overview: 12 June 2018



May-18

Apr-19




Data 12 June 2018

Comments 12 June 2018

2018 6.2

2016 5.0 6.8

2015 5.0 7.6

Target Intervention

2017 4.0 6.2

Percentage

2.8 - Looked after children subject to a conviction, Youth Caution or Youth Conditional Caution during the year


David Webb Actual 2017

Sharon Maistre-Welsh Target 2017

5.25.04.04.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

2018201720162015

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Looked after children subject to a conviction, Youth Caution or Youth Conditional Caution during the year Actual

Target

Intervention

4.0 4.05.0 5.25.0 5.0

4.0

6.6 6.76.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2015 2016 2017 2018

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Looked after children subject to a conviction, Youth Caution or Youth Conditional Caution during the year

Bournemouth

National


Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 16 of 31


Data Manager N/A

Unit of Measure



Last Updated

Next Available Data

Number Number Direction of Travel

73 9 Stable

78 17 Improving54 7 Declining77 29 Improving76 26 Stable


Direction of Travel

Stable

Quartile Banding

2.9 - Profile of Bournemouth Child Sexual Exploitation risk.

Count of the cohort of children at Quarter End by category of risk.


Latest National Rank

Quarterly

Anjali Diwan Actual Q2 18/19

James Fenby Target Q2 18/19

Number

Oct-18

Jan-19

Low

Q2 - 2018/19

Open cases at quarter end

Q4 - 2017/18 Declining

Q1 - 2018/19

Q4 - 2017/18

Q3 - 2017/18

Q2 - 2017/18

Q2 - 2018/19

New cases per quarter

Q3 - 2017/18 Improving

Q2 - 2017/18 Stable

Q1 - 2018/19



The 69 open cases at quarter end can be separated into a Children's Social Care cohort and an Early Help cohort. The higher risk CSC cohort consists of 51 children,

9 at Significant risk and 42 at Moderate risk. The lower risk EH cohort consists of 18 children at Mild or Minimal risk.

Of the 9 new cases, 1 was Significant risk and 5 were at Moderate risk. The CSE Team focus their attention on children at Significant and Moderate risk through

identifying intervention/resources to support CSE risk reduction.

* Where children have remained at Mild or Minimal risk for over 6 months and no updated risk assessments have been received, they are no longer included on

the cohort. # If an updated risk assessment is subsequently received for these children, they will be added to the cohort as 'repeat' cases.

A breakdown of the cohort risk level is shown in the chart below.

Change Management Overview: 01 October 2018RAG N/A

Stable

Please note:- The orange columns in the above chart show all Open Cases at the end of each quarter including assessments received at Mild or Minimal risk level.

The blue columns show the numbers of risk assessments received during the quarter for new children. The statement that 'Good Performance is Low' assumes good

awareness of CSE and good reporting of CSE concerns from all those working with children and young people.

Overall Cohort changes during Quarter

74 children at previous quarter end

-3 removed after 18th birthday

-12 mild or minimal for over 6 months without an updated risk assessment *

59 remaining on cohort

44 remain with no change to risk level

7 remain with increased risk

8 remain with reduced risk

+9 new cases

+1 repeat cases #

69 in total at end of September



76 77

54

7873

26 297 17 9

0

20

40

60

80

100

Q2 - 2017/18 Q3 - 2017/18 Q4 - 2017/18 Q1 - 2018/19 Q2 - 2018/19

Nu

mb

er

Count of Open Cases at Quarter End and risk forms submitted for New children in the QuarterOpen Cases at QtrEnd

New cases duringQtr

Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

107 3

11 11

40

3532 31

34

17

23

14

25

19

912

511

9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Q2 - 2017/18 Q3 - 2017/18 Q4 - 2017/18 Q1 - 2018/19 Q2 - 2018/19

Nu

mb

er

Category of risk for open cases at end of the quarter

Significant

Moderate

Mild

Minimal


Unit of Measure



Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG


16.9 Declining Amber


12 June 2017


Benchmarking Data: Not Available

Data 08 October 2018Comments 30 October 2018

Performance Analysis Commentary: The number of children in need for 6 months or more decreased by 20 this quarter. 49% (73 children) are

currently allocated to the children's health and disability team (CHAD). 85% of CHAD cases have been open for 6 months or more, whilst the CIN and

CP teams have 19% open for at least 6 months.

Service Manager Commentary: There has been a reduction in the numbers of children subject of CIN plan for 6 months. The rate is now the lowest it

has been since records began in Oct 2015.

Monitoring and scrutiny of CIN Plans approaching or exceeding 6 months is ongoing within supervision and actions taken to transfer to EH services,

escalate to CP threshold or close to universal services accordingly.


RAG 08 October 2018

Q2 2018/19 15.0 16.5

Q1 2018/19 15.0 16.5

Q3 2017/18 26.2 28.8

Target Intervention

Q4 2017/18 26.2 28.8

Quarterly Snapshot

Oct-18

Jan-19

Quartile Banding (validated)

Low



CT 2.11a - Percentage of children in need (CiN exc LAC & CP) of 0-17 population open for longer than 6 months

This data is : ProvisionalActual Q2 2018/19

Percentage

Gareth Harris Target Q2 2018/19

Jan Masterman

Latest National Rank (validated)

13.116.916.316.8

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Q2 2018/19Q1 2018/19Q4 2017/18Q3 2017/18

% o

f 0

-17

po

pu

lati

on

Percentage of children in need of 0-17 population where case is open for longer than 6 months Actual

Target

Intervention

Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 18 of 31


Unit of Measure



Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

33.9 Declining Green

32.5 Improving Green50.3 Declining Green42.2 Declining Green


Benchmarking Data:


Comments Not yet available

Performance Analysis Commentary: The number of initial child protection conferences increased by 9 this quarter and is comparable the position to 2 years ago.

The rolling 12 month rate is currently higher than every benchmark and over double the regional and lowest statistical neighbour average.

Service Manager Commentary: The rolling 12 month rate of ICPC's is significantly higher than benchmark peformance levels. The increase began shortly after the

creation of MASH and peaked in Q4. Factors impacting on this surge are linked to the new multi agency processes in MASH and an increased scrutiny of

cummulative concerns following the OFSTED Pilot Inspection of MASH and Assessment in Aug 2017. The response to the findings of this pilot assessment led to the

rising number of S47 enquiries and subsequently ICPC's. Recognising that there may have been an overstear in our response to OFSTED action was taken to have

senior management and QA oversight of thresholds and the number of enquiries and ICPC's reduced appropriately and accordingly to levels in line with

benchmarking and national trends.


RAG 08 October 2018

Q2 2018/19 56.7 62.4

Q1 2018/19 56.7 62.4

Q3 2017/18 57.7 63.4

Target Intervention

Q4 2017/18 57.7 63.4


Oct-18

Jan-19




CT 2.11b - Number of children On a Child Protection Plan expressed as a rate per 10,000 of 0-17 population.


Actual Q2 2018/19

Rate per 10,000


Jan Masterman

33.932.5

50.342.2

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

Q2 2018/19Q1 2018/19Q4 2017/18Q3 2017/18

Rat

e p

er

10

,00

0 o

f 0-

17

p

op

ula

tio

n

Number of children On a Child Protection Plan expressed as a rate per 10,000 of 0-17 population. Actual

Target

Intervention

42.250.3

32.5 33.943.3 43.3 43.3 43.3

52.7 52.7 52.7 52.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Q3 2017/18 Q4 2017/18 Q1 2018/19 Q2 2018/19Rat

e p

er

10

,00

0 o

f 0

-17

po

pu

lati

on

Number of children On a Child Protection Plan expressed as a rate per 10,000 of 0-17 population.

Bournemouth

National(2017/18)

StatisticalNeighbour(2017/18)

Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 19 of 31


Data Manager Between 60 and 65

Unit of Measure



Last Updated A.K.A COSP12 (O&S) & AC5f (Corporate Plan)

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

70.8 Declining Red

69.2 Declining Amber67.8 Declining Green65.8 Declining Green

12 June 2017


Benchmarking Data:




CT 2.11c - Number of Looked after Children (LAC) expressed as a rate per 10,000 of 0-17 population.


Actual Q2 2018/19


Rate per 10,000

Penny Lodwick


Oct-18

Jan-18

Target Intervention

Q2 2018/19 Between 60 and 65 *see below

Q1 2018/19 Between 60 and 65 *see below

Q3 2017/18 66.0 69.3

Q4 2017/18 66.0 69.3

Performance Analysis Commentary: This was the first quarter since quarter 2 16/17 where the number and rate of children in care went above 70

and into the red. We are currently 1.3 below the statistical neighbour average and 8.8 above the national. In order to meet the target, the number of

looked after children would have to reduce by 22.

Service Manager Commentary: The increase in the rate of LAC appears to be due to a surge of babies/young infants coming into care and a steady

increase of SCSA. Given the number of infants subject to a Placement Order and a group of young people 16+ reaching the age of 18, we are

expecting to see our numbers plateau by the end of the financial year. There are 16 LAC reaching the age of 18 by the end of March 2019.

We do not have robust enough early help in place to prevent children and young people coming into care. This must be strengthened for the plan to

work. We are planning to work jointly with Poole to review thresholds and bring our numbers coming into care in line with the National average. Joint

working in December 2018 and robust early help by March 2019 (Penny Lodwick Oct 18) .

Service Director Commentary: There is an increase in LAC numbers. Residential placements remain steady although too high in terms of current and

projected cost. There are fewer numbers of LAC in Foster placements. This indicates a higher success rate in finding solutions within the child/young

person’s own family (S20) and local community and more effective support for moving young people at risk of homelessness and care leavers into

independent living. LAC visits, Health and dental checks have declined. This is due to vacancies in the team which are being addressed as promptly as

possible within the available resource (Kay Errington Oct 18) .*New intervention levels set as Lower Amber - between 55 and 60 and Upper Amber - between 65 and 70.


RAG

Data


08 October 2018

08 October 2018

70.869.267.8

65.8

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

Q2 2018/19Q1 2018/19Q4 2017/18Q3 2017/18

Rat

e p

er

10

,00

0 o

f 0-

17

p

op

ula

tio

n

Number of Looked after Children (LAC) expressed as a rate per 10,000 of 0-17 population.ActualUpper target Lower target

65.8 67.8 69.2 70.8

62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0

72.1 72.1 72.1 72.1

55

60

65

70

75

Q3 2017/18 Q4 2017/18 Q1 2018/19 Q2 2018/19

Rat

e p

er

10

,00

0 o

f 0-

17

p

op

ula

tio

n

Number of Looked after Children (LAC) expressed as a rate per 10,000 of 0-17 population.

Bournemouth

National

StatisticalNeighbour

Lo

we

r is

Be

tte

r

Page 20 of 31


Unit of Measure


Frequency C

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG


80.3 Improving Amber77.6 Declining Red

79.2 Improving Red

12 June 2017


Benchmarking Data:

High Latest National Rank (validated)

Children's Overview & Scrutiny Indicators

Meeting Date: 15th November 2018

CT 2.13 - Percentage of Single Assessments completed in 45 Working Days


Anjali Diwan Actual Q2 2018/19


Percentage

Quarterly Quartile Banding (validated)

Oct-18

Jan-19

Target Intervention

Q2 2018-19 85.0 76.5

Q1 2018-19 85.0 76.5

Q4 2017-18 90.0 81.0

Q3 2017-18 90.0 81.0

Performance Analysis Commentary: The percentage dropped by 0.1% this quarter, however only 59.9% of assessments were completed within 45 working days in

September and coupled with the next indicator, it is highly likely that the quarter 3 figure will be the lowest in the last 3 years. This is disapointing as the previous 3 months

were above 85%. Our current year to date average is higher than the regional and statistcial neighbour average and is only 2.7% away from the national average. 33% (150

assessments) completed in the quarter were done so between day 41 and 45. The assessment team completed 340 asssessments in the quarter of which 81% were

completed within timescale.

Service Manager Commentary: Performance in Quarter 2 is the same as in Quarter 1 despite more assessments being completed in the period. A significant improvement

would have been seen had the improved performance sustained into September 2018: September saw the lowest level of performance for two years.

This indicator is turbulent and there appears to be no link with the number of assessments completed and the timescales achieved. However, a correlation with the

availability of staffing or capacity in the Assessment Team can be seen, as in July and August the team was fully operational and performance was strong. With low capacity

there is an impact on the robustness of management oversight and the use of 10,25 and 35 day timescales becomes less apparent. As more and more assessments are

already out of timescale this indicator is expected to worsen over the next quarter.

A Review of Transfer Protocols is planned that includes the intention to better define criteria for transfer from MASH to Assessment, this will reduce the number of

assessments transferred and clarify the nature (proportionality) of the assessment timescale. The Transfer Protocol will help to manage the level of churn (work coming in

and going out). Additional staff in the assessment team will help to clear the backlog and additional managerial support will help to ameliorate the current position.


RAG 14 August 2018



80.280.377.679.2

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Q2 2018-19Q1 2018-19Q4 2017-18Q3 2017-18

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Percentage of Single Assessments completed in 45 Working Days Actual

Target

Intervention

Hig

he

r is B

ette

r

90.5

80.683.781.5 83.4 82.9

78.682.7

77.8

70

75

80

85

90

95

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Percentage of Single Assessments completed in 45 Working Days (Validated Annual Data)

Bournemouth

National


Page 21 of 31


Data Manager To remain below 14.0

Unit of Measure


Frequency C

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG





Benchmarking Data:




3.3 - Emotional wellbeing of looked after children.


Actual 2016/17

Gareth Harris Target 2016/17

Average Score

Penny Lodwick


Mar-18

Mar-19

2016/17 14.0 17.0

2015/16 14.0 17.0

2014/15 14.0 17.0

Target Intervention

Data 14 February 2018

Comments 14 February 2018 (Comments provided by Mike Felstead)

Latest validated figures show a continued rise above the national profile. Undertaking an SDQ questionnaire early in a child’s care history, will quickly

highlight the likelihood that the child either has, or could develop, significant mental health problems. This should then assist in

accessing/commissioning appropriate intervention to support the child. Data from SDQ returns help to give an indication on how effective the service

provision provided is in meeting the needs of looked after children. This data suggests that the emotional wellbeing of Bournemouth is similar to the

average across the county. No update to this annual indicator - 8th October 2018 .



14.914.314.2

0

5

10

15

20

2016/172015/162014/15

Ave

rage

Sco

re

Emotional wellbeing of looked after children. Actual

Target

Intervention

14.2 14.3

14.9

13.9 14.0 14.1

14.7 14.615.1

13

13.5

14

14.5

15

15.5

2014/15 2015/16 2016/17

Ave

rage

Sco

re

Emotional wellbeing of looked after children.

Bournemouth

National


Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 22 of 31

Performance Manager 6Data Manager N/A

Unit of Measure


Frequency N/A

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

6 N/A N/A

5 N/A N/A

4 N/A N/A

5 N/A N/A

5 N/A N/A

12 June 2017


Benchmarking Data: No data available

N/A Latest National Rank



3.5 - Non-Statutory homeless households with dependent children or a pregnant woman.


Alison Slimm Actual Q2 2018/19

Alison Slimm

Number


Oct-18

Jan-19

Q2 - 2018/19 N/A N/A

Q4 - 2017/18 N/A N/A

Q2 - 2017/18 N/A N/A

Target Intervention

Q3 - 2017/18 N/A N/A

RAG N/A


Comments 10 October 2018 - Alison Slimm

Q1 - 2018/19 N/A N/A

6 families:

2 families for 2 weeks

1 family a month

1 family 4 months

2 on going (currently 6 weeks)


Data Observations by MI Team:

Alison Slimm has taken on the role of Intentionally Homeless Housing Officer since June 16 with the aim to reduce the number in B&Bs to zero. She is

involved in preventative work to enable this.

65

455

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Q2 - 2018/19Q1 - 2018/19Q4 - 2017/18Q3 - 2017/18Q2 - 2017/18

Nu

mb

er

of

Ho

use

ho

lds

Non-Statutory homeless households with dependent children or a pregnant woman.

Actual

Page 23 of 31


Unit of Measure



Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

6.9 Improving Green

6.0 Improving Amber

4.8 Declining Red

4.9 Improving Red


Benchmarking Data:

High



CT 3.6 - Care leavers aged 19, 20 and 21 in higher education.


Actual Q2 2018/19


Percentage

Penny Lodwick

Latest National Rank (validated)

5.4

Quarterly

Oct-18

Jan-19

Quartile Banding (validated)

Performance Analysis Commentary: For the first quarter since Q4 2016/17 we are above the target and are now higher than most benchmarks.

Service Managers Commentary: It is going to take 12 months to see any real change in this indicator because stability cannot be created overnight, it

will take time and hopefully there may be gradual improvements seen over the next few months.

Q1 2018/19 6.0 5.4

Q4 2017/18 6.0 5.4

Q3 2017/18 6.0 5.4

Target Intervention

Q2 2018/19 6.0


RAG

Data


08 October 2018

08 October 2018

6.96.0

4.8

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Q2 2018/19Q1 2018/19Q4 2017/18

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Care leavers aged 19, 20 and 21 in higher education. Actual

Target

Intervention

4.9 4.86.0

6.96.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Q3 2017/18 Q4 2017/18 Q1 2018/19 Q2 2018/19

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Care leavers aged 19, 20 and 21 in higher education.

Bournemouth

National


Hig

he

r is B

ette

r

Page 24 of 31


Data Manager 90.0

Unit of Measure


Frequency D

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

82.8 Declining Red

83.3 Improving Red




Benchmarking Data:



Oct-18

CT 3.7 - Percentage of care leavers in suitable accommodation


Penny Lodwick Actual Q2 2018/19


Percentage



Jan-19

Target Intervention

Q2 2018/19 90.0 85.0

Q1 2018/19 90.0 85.0

Q4 2017/18 86.0 77.4

Q3 2017/18 86.0 77.4


Performance Analysis Commentary: 15 care leavers have been deemed to be living in unsuitable accommodation this quarter. As an overall

percentage we are currently higher than the statistical neighbour average by 1.8% and 1.2% below the national average..

Service Manager Commentary: Performance has dipped again slightly. Currently we have 5 Care Leavers in custody and 5 with No fixed abode. I think

we have more accurate data and our performance is impacted upon by the cost of local housing as well as some of our care leavers moving some

distance away however the plan needs to be reviewed.


RAG 14 August 2018


82.883.381.979.3

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Q2 2018/19Q1 2018/19Q4 2017/18Q3 2017/18

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Care leavers in suitable accommodation Actual

Target

Intervention

79.3

81.983.3 82.8

84.0 84.0 84.0 84.0

81.0 81.0 81.0 81.0

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

Q3 2017/18 Q4 2017/18 Q1 2018/19 Q2 2018/19

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Care leavers in suitable accommodation

Bournemouth

National


Hig

he

r is B

ette

r

Page 25 of 31


Data Manager 50.0

Unit of Measure


Frequency D

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG


42.9 Improving Red

41.0 Improving Red

40.2 Improving Red


Benchmarking Data:



Oct-18

CT 3.8 - Percentage of Care leavers at 19,20 & 21 in education, employment or training


Penny Lodwick Actual Q2 2018/19


Percentage

High Latest National Rank (validated)

Quarterly Quartile Banding (validated)

Jan-19

Target Intervention

Q2 2018/19 50.0 45.0

Q1 2018/19 50.0 45.0

Q4 2017/18 53.0 47.7

Q3 2017/18 53.0 47.7



Performance Analysis Commentary: For the fourth quarter in succession, the percentage of 19-21 year old care leavers in education, employment or

training (EET) has continue to rise and is now less than 5% away from the target. We are currently below all of the benchmarks. 18% (16 care leavers)

are in some form of full time EET. Of the 50 care leavers not in education employment or training (NEET), disability reasons count of 20% (18 care

leavers) and parenting or pregnancy count for 8% (7 care leavers). If half of the NEET's because of other reasons get into EET then this would boost

our percentage to at least 58%, which would be higher than most of the benchmarks.

Service Manager Commentary: Performance is improving but we still remain lower than all the other benchmarks. Currently out of the total 19-21

NEET we have the following G4 – Health reasons – 20, G6 – parenting – 7, G5 – NEET for no reason - 19.

The plan is working and given the number of Care Leavers NEET due to health or parenting reasons the progress will be gradual.

There will be a discussion with Virtual School Executive Head Review of Multi-disciplinary meetings with TM.


RAG 08 October 2018

45.142.941.040.2

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Q2 2018/19Q1 2018/19Q4 2017/18Q3 2017/18

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Care leavers at 19, 20 & 21 in education, employment or training Actual

Target

Intervention

40.2 41.0 42.9 45.150.0 50.0 50.0 50.048.3 48.3 48.3 48.3

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Q3 2017/18 Q4 2017/18 Q1 2018/19 Q2 2018/19

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Care leavers at 19, 20 & 21 in education, employment or training

Bournemouth

National


Hig

he

r is B

ette

r

Page 26 of 31

Performance Manager 202Data Manager N/A

Unit of Measure


Frequency N/A

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

202 N/A N/A267 N/A N/A248 N/A N/A258 N/A N/A

12 June 2017


Benchmarking Data: No data available

Q2 2018/19

These figures are from Dorset Police, relating to incidents of domestic abuse they are called to, where there are children in the household. This

represents around 46% of all domestic abuse incidents that the Police are called to during this period. This is a significant reduction on previously

reported figures and work is ongoing to understand this.


N/A

N/A N/A

Q1 2018/19 N/A

RAG N/A



Quartile Banding

Q3 2017/18 N/A N/A

Quarterly

Oct-18

Jan-19

Q4 2017/18 N/A N/A

Target Intervention

N/A Latest National Rank



3.9 - Number of domestic abuse notifications involving children.


Kay Errington Actual Q2 2018/19

Andrew Williams Target Q2 2018/19

Number

218 218 202 212248 249 258 248 267

202

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Q1

20

16

/17 Q2

20

16

/17 Q3

20

16

/17 Q4

20

16

/17 Q1

20

17

/18 Q2

20

17

/18 Q3

20

17

/18 Q4

20

17

/18 Q1

20

18

/19 Q2

20

18

/19

Nu

mb

er

of

No

tifi

cati

on

s

Domestic abuse notifications involving children

DorsetPolice

Page 27 of 31


Data Manager N/A

Unit of Measure


Frequency N/A

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

9 N/A N/A

17 N/A N/A

22 N/A N/A

22 N/A N/A

12 June 2017




Oct-18

3.10 - Number of children and young people entering treatment for substance misuse (0-18)

This data is : Provisional for Q2

Chris Snelling Actual Q2 2018/19

Chris Snelling Target Q2 2018/19

Number



Jan-19

Target Intervention

Q2 - 2018/19 N/A N/A

Q1 - 2018/19 N/A N/A

Q4 - 2017/18 N/A N/A

Q3 - 2017/18 N/A N/A



Local data used for Quarter 2, as National data was unavailable. Of the 0 – 18 year old group, the main drug of use recorded for this quarter is

cannabis at 8 of the referrals and alcohol for one case. During this period, referral sources were varied, the main source being childrens mental health

with 3 referrals, crime prevention and education with 2 referrals each, one self referral and one referral from youth services. The youngest to enter

treatment was aged 13, a further two were aged 14 with the remainder in the 16 to 18 age group. This is a significant drop in referrals, possibly due to

external factors as initial enquiries of the service have not shown up any significant change in provision.

It is worth noting that during this period,17 new individuals were in contact with the service, of which the above 9 entered treatment.

Overall, there were 332 individual contact sessions recorded, 263 being structured treatment sessions and 69 advice and information, these being

only slightly lower than the last quarter.


RAG N/A

9

172222

0

5

10

15

20

25

Q2 - 2018/19Q1 - 2018/19Q4 - 2017/18Q3 - 2017/18

Nu

mb

er

Children and young people entering treatment for substance misuse.

Actual

Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 28 of 31

Performance Manager Actual Q1 2018/19 81.5

Data Manager

Unit of Measure

Good Performance is Latest National Rank N/A

Frequency Quartile Banding N/A

Last Updated

Next Available Data

CAMHS Team

81.5

NA

NA

NA




3.11 - Percentage of referrals to treatment time for CAMHS


Quarterly

Jul-18

Oct-18

High

Stuart Lynch

Hayley Stacey

Percentage

Q1 2018/19

Q4 2017/18

Q2 2017/18

Q3 2017/18

Data 14 August 2018

Comments 14 August 2018 - Commentary provided by Hayley Stacey

Change Management Overview: 14 August 2018

RAG N/A

The setup of the teams has changed on the RiO system. Previously the teams were split by tier and locality (i.e. Bournemouth CAMHS Tier 2,

Bournemouth CAMHS Tier 3). The Bournemouth CAMHS team is now set up as a single team, with no tier split. These changes were made to

reflect what is happening within the service, a move away from the tiered approach to working.

Performance Analysis Commentary: During the last quarter we have made some changes to the reporting system to ensure it is reflective of how

the service works. This means we no longer record a ‘tier split’ for Referral to Treatment waiting times. A team level split for all clients on the RTT

pathway has been provided.

Quarter 2 Update not yet available - 08/10/2018

0000

20

40

60

80

100

Q1 2018/19Q4 2017/18Q3 2017/18Q2 2017/18

%

Referrals to Treatment time for CAMHS

CAMHSTeam

Page 29 of 31

Performance Manager Rate 30.7Data Manager Frequency 2.61

Unit of Measure

Good Performance is Rate

Frequency Frequency

Last Updated 16

Next Available Data A

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG



33.8 Improving Green32.4 Improving Green

12 June 2017


Benchmarking Data: YJB Statistical Returns - Published Data for SW Region and National.

Low Target 2018/19



3.12 - The rate and frequency of re-offending by young people who have re-offended


David Webb Actual DCYOS Q1 2018/19

Sharon Maistre-Welsh

Percentage and Number

Quarterly

Aug-18 Latest National Rank

Nov-18 Quartile Banding

Target Intervention

Q1 2018/19 41.7 N/A

Q4 2017/18 41.7 N/A

Q2 2017/18 41.8 N/A

Q3 2017/18 42.3 N/A

The most recently published data relates to young people who started an intervention with the Youth Offending Service between July and September

2016, and their re-offending over the following 12 month period.

The MOJ no longer provide quarterly data at Local Authority level, so the figures presented here will be for the Pan Dorset area and will include the

outcomes for all qualifying Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole young people. The data in each quarter refers to a completely different cohort of young

people to the preceding one, so the data may potentially fluctuate, depending on the individuals in a given cohort.

In the most recent quarter, DCYOS performance is in the top 25% of all YOTs.


RAG 11 September 2018



30.737.3

33.832.4

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

Q1 2018/19Q4 2017/18Q3 2017/18Q2 2017/18

Nu

mb

er

The rate of re-offending by young people who have re-offended(rolling year)

Actual

32.4 33.8 37.330.7

41.8 42.3 41.7 41.734.9 32.7 36.7 34.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

Q2 2017/18 Q3 2017/18 Q4 2017/18 Q1 2018/19

Nu

mb

er

The rate of re-offending by young people who have re-offended(rolling year)

Bournemouth

National


Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 30 of 31

Performance Manager 0.10Data Manager N/A

Unit of Measure

Good Performance is 21 out of 137

Frequency A

Last Updated

Next Available Data

ActualDirection of

TravelRAG

0.10 Declining Green

0.08 Stable Green


12 June 2017


Benchmarking Data: YJB Statistical Returns - Published Data for SW Region and National.




3.13 - The rate of the number of custodial sentences per 1000 of the 10-17 year olds population in the area


David Webb Actual Q1 2018/19

Sharon Maistre-Welsh Target Q1 2018/19

Percentage and Number


Aug-18

Nov-18

Q1 2018-19 (Jul 17 - Jun 18) 0.33 N/A

Q3 2017-18 (Jan 17 - Dec 17) 0.40 N/A

Q2 2017-18 (Oct 16 - Sep 17) 0.41 N/A

Target Intervention

Q4 2017-18 (Apr 17 - Mar 18) 0.37 N/A



This indicator relates to the number of custodial sentences given to young people aged 17 years or younger, presented as a rate per 1,000 young people

in the 10 to 17 local general population. The figures presented are for the Pan Dorset service, and include Bournemouth, Poole and Dorset young people,

with the most recent figures relating to custodial sentences received in the 12 months to 30 June 2018. During this timeframe, there were 6 young

people from the Pan Dorset area who received custodial sentences, 1 of whom was from Bournemouth.

DCYOS continues to maintain its very low custody rate, with performance in the the top 25% of scores for all YOTs.

It would not be appropriate to set a target since the aim is to have the fewest possible custodial sentences.


RAG 31 December 2016

0.100.080.08

0.10

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

Q1 2018-19(Jul 17 - Jun 18)

Q4 2017-18(Apr 17 - Mar 18)

Q3 2017-18(Jan 17 - Dec 17)

Q2 2017-18(Oct 16 - Sep 17)

Nu

mb

er

The rate of the number of custodial sentences per 1000 of the 10-17 year olds population in the area(rolling year Jul17 - Jun18)

Actual

0.10 0.08 0.08 0.10

0.41 0.40 0.37 0.33

0.16 0.19 0.19 0.16

0

0

0

0

0

1

Q2 2017-18… Q3 2017-18… Q4 2017-18… Q1 2018-19…

Nu

mb

er

The rate of the number of custodial sentences per 1000 of the 10-17 year olds population in the area(rolling year Jul17 - Jun18)

DCYOS

National


Lo

we

r is B

ette

r

Page 31 of 31

hildren’s trust oard 15 october 2018, 15:00 16:30...2018/10/15 · children's trust...

Documents