hiromi iinuma (kek) for new g-2/edm@j-parc collaboration new g-2/edm@j-parc collaboration 1....
TRANSCRIPT
Hiromi Iinuma (KEK) for New g-2/EDM@J-PARC
collaboration
1. Motivation and goal2. Outline of new experiment 3. Summary
NEW APPROACH TO THE MUON g2 AND EDM EXPERIMENT AT J-PARC
2
Motivation for Muon g-2 and EDM
Latest experimental result :PRD73, 072003 (2006)
WeakQCDQEDSM aaaa Standard model
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2009/reviews/rpp2009-rev-g-2-muon-anom-mag-moment.pdf
2.3104963255a 11SM-Exp
Recent theoretical work HLMNT10(preliminary) 3.2 (Tau2010)
2010/9/28
ppm54.0a
a exp
ppm1.0
+ + ++ + + +
Electric Dipole Moment
Scaling from electron EDM EDM~1025 e.cm A recent theoretical work EDM = 1022~ 1024 e.cm ?G. Hiller et al. hep-ph/1008.5091v1 (2010, Aug.)
EDM upper limit:1.8 1019 e.cm (95% C.L.)PRD 80, 052008 (2009)
Go beyond at least order of magnitude!
How to measure a =(g2)/2 and EDM?
B2
2g
m
ecsa
Measure the muon precession frequency in the uniform magnetic field B
2010/9/283
Bam
ea
B
B
a
a
a
a
< 0.1 ppm < 0.1 ppm
“Non-zero EDM case”
Measure two frequency vectors separately!!
BEDMc2
Bam
eEDMa
csa
B
S
Magic momentum + beam cancels focusing electric field term
B=1.45 Tesla 、 diameter 14m 、 45m round12 magnet yoke pieces
4
c
EBEDM
c2
c
Ea
1
1Ba
m
q2Sca
EDM=03.29magic
Great E821 and beyond the horizon
e+
2/a=4.4sec150 (g-2) Cycles in Positron Time Spectrum!
PRD73, 072003 (2006)
Ee+ > 1.8 GeV calorimetry
ppm .syst28.0.stat46.0ppm54.0a
a
ppm21.0 ,ppm17.0B
B
a
a
2010/9/28
• More muons! Statistics uncertainty < 0.1 ppm (0.46ppm)• For the better B/B <0.1ppm ( 0.17ppm);
• Compact storage ring to reduce the field volume• For the better a/a <0.1 ppm ( 0.21ppm);
• Ultra-cold muon beam, even “off-magic” momentum • High granularity detector
• Measure two frequency vectors separately for g2 and EDM measurements
Independent experimental approach provides independent systematic studies for even clearer physics understanding!!
High Intensity Muon Beam in JAPAN!
5
J-PARC
Tokyo
KEK
2010/9/28
Bird’s eye photo in Feb. 2008
J-PARC Facility(KEK/JAEA)
P, 30GeV
-beam
P, 3GeV
Thursday 10:00 Prof. N. Saito
6
Graphite target (20 mm)
3 GeV proton beam ( 333 uA)
Surface muon beam (28 MeV/c, 4x108/s)
Muonium Production (300 K ~ 25 meV 2.3 keV/c)⇒Surface muon
Ultra Cold m+ Source
Muon LINAC (300 MeV/c)
Muon
storage
2010/9/28
Proton beam(3 GeV, 1MW, 25 Hz)
Muon Linac (300 MeV/c)
(28 MeV/c)
New Muon g-2/EDM Experiment at J-PARC with Ultra-Cold Muon Beam
Step1: Ultra-Cold + Source and LINACLaser
(2.3 keV/c)
Graphite target (20 mm)
3 GeV proton beam ( 333 uA)
Surface muon beam (28 MeV/c, 4x108/s)
Muonium Production (300 K ~ 25 meV 2.3 keV/c)⇒Surface muon
Ultra Cold m+ Source
Muon LINAC (300 MeV/c)
Muon
storage
Super Precision Magnetic Field(3T, ~1ppm local precision)
2010/9/28
0.66 m diameter
+ beam
=3 and B=3 [T]
Step2: Injection & storage
Step3: Detect decay e+
New Muon g-2/EDM Experiment at J-PARC with Ultra-Cold Muon Beam
(note: 14 m for E821)7
2010/9/288
Expected precession signal from J-PARC within a Snowmass year beam time !
Ee> 200MeV
Default 50% pol.Study for high pol. Is ongoing.
2010/9/28
Example EDM wiggle, if EDM=210-20 e.cm
example
9
Expected sensitivity for EDM would be better than 210-20 e.cm
BEDM
R&D items are running!
2010/9/2810
Step2: Injection & storage
Step3: Detect decay e+
Step1: Ultra-cold + source and LINAC• Test experiments to search the best
Mu production target are ongoing at TRIUMF and RAL !
• Hi Power Ly- Laser System R&D• LINAC R&D
GEANT4
• Setup spin dependent muon-decay including EDM term in GEANT4
• Positron detector design• Hi-rate Si Tracker• Belle sensor with SiLC
based FEE
• See next few pages
3D-spiral injection
RB
+
F
2010/9/2811
Back to Step2: Injection & storageTechnical difficulties: 3T is too high to cancel fringe field by
inflector, Required kick angle (~60 mrad) is too big.
Concept is simple but real design ?
Storage ring magnet (ver.0 design)
2010/9/2812
Cylindrical return yoke (Iron)
Upper end cap (Iron)
Pole tip (Iron)
Tunnel for + beam
Upper half
Super conductive Main coils
3T super conductive solenoid magnet Uniformity in the beam storage region<0.1ppm Careful design of fringe field for stable beam injection
1.8m
4.6m
Inner radius 1.6m
1ppm level at storage volume is achieved
Apply MRI technology!
Storage ring magnet (ver.0 design)
2010/9/2813
+
1.8m
4.6m + beam orbit diameter 0.66m2.1m round (cyclotron period=7.4 nsec)
1. 3 tesla super conductive solenoid magnet2. Uniformity in the beam storage region<0.1ppm3. Careful design of fringe field for stable beam injection
Upper half
2010/9/2814
Beam acceptance study is ongoing
Start
+
y<0Solenoid axis
y>0
y>0y<0
y
Beam acceptance
Coil
Vertical kicker (ver.0)
2010/9/2815
Helmholtz typeBr(t)=Bpeak sin(t)
Apply radial magnetic field to reduce beam vertical momentum
Prototype kicker is being designed for test.
±10cmSTOP!
SummaryA new muon g2 and EDM experiment at JPARC:Off-magic momentumUltra-cold muon beam + compact g-2 ring Independent experimental approach provides independent
systematic uncertainty Complementary to New g2@FNAL
Saturday 10:00 Prof. B. Lee Robertshttp://gm2.fnal.gov/public_docs/proposals/Proposal_g-2-3.0Feb2009.pdf
Active R&D efforts are ongoing!
My next step: Verification test for injection + kicker system
16 2010/9/28
J-PARC g-2/EDM collaboration 71 members (…still evolving) M. Aoki, P. Bakule, B. Bassalleck, G. Beer, A. Deshpande, S. Eidelman,
D. E. Fields, M. Finger, M. Finger Jr., Y. Fujirawa, S. Hirota, H. Iinuma, M. Ikegami, K. Ishida, M. Iwasaki, T. Kakurai, T. Kamitani, Y. Kamiya, N. Kawamura, S. Komamiya, K. Koseki, Y. Kuno, O. Luchev, G. Marshall, M. Masuzawa, Y. Matsuda, T. Matsuzaki, T. Mibe, K. Midorikawa, S. Mihara, Y.Miyake, J. Murata, W.M. Morse, R. Muto, K. Nagamine, T. Naito, H. Nakayama, M. Naruki, H. Nishiguchi, M. Nio, D. Nomura, H. Noumi, T. Ogawa, T. Ogitsu, K. Ohishi, K. Oide, A. Olin, N. Saito, N.F. Saito, Y. Sakemi, K. Sasaki, O. Sasaki, A. Sato, Y. Semeritzidis, K. Shimomura, B. Shwartz, P. Strasser, R. Sugahara, K. Tanaka, N. Terunuma, D. Tomono, T.Toshito, K. Ueno, V. Vrba, S. Wada, A. Yamamoto, K. Yokoya, K. Yokoyama, Ma. Yoshida, M. H. Yoshida, and K. Yoshimura
18 Institutions Academy of Science, BNL, BINP, UC Riverside, Charles U., KEK, NIRS,
UNM, Osaka U., RCNP, STFC RAL, RIKEN, Rikkyo U., SUNYSB, CRC Tohoku, U. Tokyo, TRIUMF, U. Victoria
6 countries Czech, USA, Russia, Japan, UK, Canada17
Thank you!
2010/9/28
Backups
2010/9/2818
Requirements for Kicker
19
Br(t)=Bpeak sin(t)=/TkickField strength :
Bpeak = 1Gauss ~ 10 GaussTime distribution :
Tkick=150 nsec (c.f. 20 cyclotron periods)Spatial distribution :
33cm±5mm in radial direction, 1% uniformity±10cm in solenoid axis direction to reduce distortion o f beam bunch shape
Minimal effect for positron detector :1. Quench protection2. Space problem3. Eddy currents on cryostat wall
e+ detector(Silicon tracker) 2010/9/28
20 2010/9/28
Kicker circuit and eddy current study
Start DAQ
R=60cm cryostat wall
2010/9/2821
Br0
5%20%
2 deg.
0.8 deg.
Small angle orbit requires “smooth” Br distribution Smooth Br provides easy requirements for beam and kicker
Smaller angle orbit gets bigger integral
field effectNeed to decrease
510-4 Tesla
Injection orbit stability: Shallow vs. deep angle orbit
“good field region” weak magnetic focus ?
2010/9/2822
yR
BnB ,
R
rn1BB
r
B
B
Rn
y0Ry0y
y
y0
1mmr , ppm1.0B
B
y0
y
Focus condition 0<n<1n<1: for radial direction
n>0 :solenoid axis direction
We have n=3E-5
• 3D field measurement is needed…
If we require:
Field inside beam tunnel
2010/9/2823
Inside tunnel
Gauss
Cross section1
Cross section2
Cross section3
Absolute field strength along the tunnel
Cross-section1
Outside
2010/9/2824
10cm
Field vectors
Cross section1 Cross section2 8cm
Cross section3 50cm
We are trying square and circle shapes
Field measurement =NMR frequency measurement
Measure and well better than
0.1ppm
Muonium hyper splitting experiment to improve (ongoing at J-PARC)
2010/9/2825
26
K. Hagiwara et al., PLB 649 (2007) 173-179
10-10
11658471.8 0.0
693.2 5.1
15.4 0.2
11659180.4 5.1
Dominant component~99%(ee ~73%)
Dominant uncertainty
aSM = Q
EDQ
CDW
eak
T.Kinoshita, M.Nio
Recent ee experimental data made big contributions (BaBar, KLOE….)
Theoretical calculation
K.Hagiwara D. Nomura
2010/9/28
2010/9/2827
K. Hagiwara et al., PLB 649 (2007) 173-179
.
s34
hadronseesR
sK
,s
sKsRds
3
ma
2
*0tot
s 2
2
LO,had
th
Nambu-Goldstone boson’s exchange
J. Prades, arXiv:0907.2938v1
10HLbL 106.25.10a
0, ,’
is a known function (PRD69 093003), !
M
BNL, FNAL, and J-PARC
28
BNL-E821 Fermilab J-PARC
Muon momentum 3.09 GeV/c 0.3 GeV/c
gamma 29.3 3
Storage field B=1.45 T 3.0 T
Focusing field Electric quad None
# of detected m+ decays 5.0E9 1.8E11 1.5E12
# of detected m- decays 3.6E9 - -
Precision (stat) 0.46 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.1 ppm
2010/9/28
Muon source
29
Requrements:40000 times more muons, andCooler muon than RAL
670 times higher surface muon per spill at J-PARC 2.4 x 104/spill 1600 x 104/spill (25 spill/sec)
100 times intense laser 1mJ 100mJ
Room temperature target (hot tangsten silica aerogel?)2000K (15keV/c) 300K (2.3keV/c)
4x104 ultra-cold muon/spill with p=2.3keV/c2010/9/28
g-2:Stored Energy / Cold MassK. Sasaki, T. Ogitsu, et al.
Not an extreme, but requires serious efforts Material : NbTi /Copper Cu/Sc ratio : 4 Central Field:3T Peak Field on Cable: 5.4 T Nominal current : 417 A Stored Energy : 23 MJ Inductance : 264.5 H Total mass : 3.7 t
Well withincurrent Technology !
30 2010/9/28
g-2 silicon trackerDetector area
0.12 * number of vanes [m2]2.9 m2 for 24 vanes
Number of sensors384 for 24 vanes
Number of channelsAssume 0.2 mm pitch115k for 24 vanes*
– *288k for multi-segments readoutg-2 silicon tracker
576 mm
580
mm
2010/9/2831
32
Silicon strip module
front back
Support
DSSD sensors
Readout chip
2010/9/2832
Silicon sensor
33
Sensor type : Double-sided SSD Chip size : ~12 cm x 6 cm Thickness: 320 um Readout: AC-couple Depletion voltage : 80 V Detector capacitance : ~100pF* Strip pitch : 200um*
* to be determined by further studies.
From Belle SVD page
p-side n-side
2010/9/28
Spin equation (T-BMT equation + EDM)
Our case: 0EB
34 2010/9/28
yyxx
yz
xz
x
y
ss
s
s
m2
eB
0
s
s
1am
eBs
dt
sd
sm2
eB
dt
dsz