history of psychology
TRANSCRIPT
History of Psychology
NATIVISM VS. EMPIRICISM
Nativist view- holds that Nativist view- holds that human beings enter human beings enter the world with an the world with an inborn store of inborn store of knowledge and knowledge and understanding of understanding of realityreality
Rene DescartesRene Descartes
Are human capability inborn or acquired through experience? Are human capability inborn or acquired through experience?
Empiricist View – holds that Empiricist View – holds that knowledge is acquired knowledge is acquired through experience and through experience and interactions with the interactions with the world.world.
John Locke -tabula rasa John Locke -tabula rasa “blank slate”“blank slate”
• Psychology has its roots in philosophy and physiology.
A. Traditionally, psychology is said to have began with man’s earliest speculation regarding human nature.
Since the dawn of recorded thought, man has Since the dawn of recorded thought, man has had a curiosity about his own behavior and its had a curiosity about his own behavior and its relationship to causal events. The earliest relationship to causal events. The earliest attempts were essentially attempts were essentially animisticanimistic – wherein – wherein the Gods or the spirits were attributed the the Gods or the spirits were attributed the power to direct or cause events and activities power to direct or cause events and activities of men.of men.
B. The Greek Influence
Democritus – believed that the human mind is composed of atoms which could circulate freely and which enabled it to penetrate the whole body. According to him atoms from our environment enter through our sense organs enabling us to perceive the world around us.
B. The Greek Influence
Plato – the mind or soul is distinct in its own right and is God-given. It enters the body with its reflected perfection of God and rules the body which it inhabits as knower, thinker and determiner of actions.
The soul is composed of three parts:1. head – exerts reason. It is called rational soul.
2. heart – responsible for our noble impulses. It is called emotional soul.
3. diaphragm or abdomen – seat of our own
passions. It is called irrational soul.
B. The Greek Influence
Aristotle – a student of Plato, distinguished three functions of the soul.
1. vegetative soul – concerned with basic maintenance of life.
2. appetitive soul – concerned with motives and desires.
3. rational soul– the governing function located in the heart.
The brain merely performs minor mechanical processes as a gland.
B. The Greek Influence
Galen – contributed his theory of the dependence of human temperament on physiological factors. Differences in behavior is attributed to the “humors” or vital juices of the body namely blood, phlegm, black bile and yellow bile.
He correspondingly named temperaments:1. sanguine – cheerful (blood)2. phlegmatic – sluggish, slow, unresponsive (phlegm)3. melancholic – sad (black bile)4. choleric – irascible, easily angered, hot-tempered
(yellow bile)
C. Medieval Period
St. Agustine – combined Platonic Psychology with Christian thinking. He introduced and use the method of introspection and manifested his interest in distinguishing several faculties of the soul as Will, Memory, Imagination and others, producing the first definite development of what later was called Faculty Psychology.
St. Thomas Aquinas – combined Aristotelian notions to the theologically imperative idea of immortality.
D. Pre-Modern Period
Rene Descartes – formulated a theory of mind-body interaction.
John Locke – in his “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding” introduced the idea as the unit into which all experiences may be analyzed.
D. Pre-Modern Period
George Berkeley – in his theory of knowledge (solipsistic philosophy) said that ideas become the only reality.
Solipsism - the theory that the only possible true knowledge is of self-existence.
David Hume – like Berkeley, wrestled with the problem between impression and
ideas, between images and direct sensations.
E. Scientific Psychology
18791879 – Wilhelm Wundt founded the first – Wilhelm Wundt founded the first psychological laboratory in Leipzig, psychological laboratory in Leipzig, GermanyGermany
WundtWundt – Father of Scientific Psychology – Father of Scientific Psychology
1888 – Francis Galton develops correlations
1890 – William James published his Principles of Psychology
E. Scientific Psychology
E. Scientific Psychology
1892 - G. Stanley Hall established the American Psychological Association
1900 – Sigmund Freud “The Interpretation of Dreams”`
- Ivan Pavlov begun studying conditioning
1913 – John Watson “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It”
E. Scientific Psychology
1928 – Hans Berger discovers the method of recording EEG.
EEG (electroencephalogram) – recording of electrical brain waves made by placing disc-shaped electrodes on the surface of the skull.
E. Scientific Psychology
1938 – B. F. Skinner “The Behavior of Organisms”
1951 – Carl Rogers “Client-centered Therapy”
E. Scientific Psychology
1954 – Abraham Maslow “Motivation and Personality”
1967 – Neisser “Cognitive Psychology”
1981 – Roger Sperry wins Nobel Prize on his work on the SPLIT BRAIN.
1983 – Centennial celebration of the founding of G. Stanley Hall’s laboratory
Psychology in France
Phillippe Pinel and others began as early as the 19th century the enlightened psychological interpretation of insanity.
Anton Mesmer – developed hypnosis or “animal magnetism”
Seguin – made use of testing in the teaching of mentally retarded children.
Alfred Binet – Father of Intelligence Tests; started the first intelligence
tests
Psychology in England Charles Darwin – published origin of the species in
1859
Sir Francis Galton studied individual differences and evolved his ingenuous technique of measurement.
Karl Pearson and Spearman gave England a
leadership in the development of Statistical methods
Psychology in Germany
E. H. Weber’s work in 1830 on sensation and stimulation was modified by Fechner in 1860 into the Weber-Fechner Law.
Helmholtz developed the theory of color vision in 1852 and audition in 1863.
Classical Conditioning
• learning that results from the association of two stimuli (a neutral stimulus is paired with a stimulus that reflexively elicits that response.
• kind of learning in which a previously neutral stimulus (one that does not originally elicit a response) acquires the power to elicit the response
after the stimulus is repeatedly associated with another stimulus that ordinarily elicit
the response.
Ivan Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning
Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist is well known for his work in classical conditioning or stimulus substitution. Pavlov’s most renowned experiment involved meat, a dog and a bell. Initially, Pavlov was measuring the dog’s salivation in order to study digestion. This is when he stumbled upon classical conditioning.
Pavlov’s Experiment
Before conditioning, ringing the bell (neutral stimulus) caused no response to the dog. Placing food (unconditioned stimulus) in front of the dog initiated salivation (unconditioned response). During conditioning, the bell was rung a few seconds before the dog was presented with food. After conditioning, the ringing of the bell (conditioned stimulus) alone
produced salivation. This is classical conditioning.
Pavlov’s Experiment
Before Conditioning Unconditioned Stimulus
Ex. meat
bell
Neutral stimulus
bell
During the experiment
Bell meat
Unconditioned Response
salivates
no salivation
Unconditioned Stimulus
meat
salivates
After the experimentConditioned Stimulus
bell
Conditioned Response
salivates
B. F. Skinner’s Operant Conditioning
• learning that occurs when an organism learns to associate its behavior with the consequences or results of that behavior.
• kind of learning in which a person tends to
repeat a behavior that has been reinforced or to cease a behavior that has been punished.
Reinforcement – a stimulus experienced following a behavior, which increases the probability that the behavior will be repeated.
Punishment – a stimulus experienced following a behavior, which decreases the
probability that the behavior will be repeated.
Reinforcement can either be positive or negative.• Positive consists of giving a reward, such as food, gold
stars, money, or praise.• Negative reinforcement consists of taking away something
the individual does not like(known as an aversive event).
• Negative reinforcement is sometimes confused with punishment. However they are different.
Positive reinforcement- giving something one likes
- presenting a positive event
Negative reinforcement- taking away something one
does not like
- removing an aversive event
Punishment- giving something one does
not like or presenting an aversive event
- taking away something one likes or removing a positive event
• Whether a consequence is reinforcing or punishing depends on the person. What is reinforcing for one person may be punishing for another.