HOBBS LAKE PROJB

Report on 2001 Summer ProspedfiBy I. Tchajkov

INTRODUCTION-c*r

I. Tchajkov, M. Se has conducted this work, on behalf and expenses of Mr. Albert Leblanc. The project covered two closely placed, but separated prospects: the Hobbs Lake (HL) Southern and HohJ?S Lake (HL) Northern. They are located in the Hobbs Twp, Nipissing Mining District, 118 km NE of Sudbury, Ontario.

ACCESS AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

To reach the area from Sudbury one must drive 58 km to east along the 17 highway till town of Warren, than 27 km to north along the regional road 539 and than 33 km to north on gravel roads, build mainly by logging companies. Neglected log roads, ATV and snow-machine trials have been used within the boundaries of prospects. Caution should be taken while using these trails after having rain.

About 1/3 of the investigated area is covered by lakes, ponds, creeks, and swaps. Southeastern slopes of the local heights are the steepest and best exposed.

GENERAL SRUCTURAL AND GEOLOGICAL SETTING

The area is structurally very diverse zone where the 3 major provinces of the Canadian Shield (the Superior, the Southern and the Grenville) intersect, immediately to south of the Grenville Front. The northwest trending faults are the best observed and the most pronounced topographically, they believed to be a part of the Lake Timiskaming Structural Zone.

oGeological mapping was far beyond the objectives of the reported work, the most of g observed bedrock are presented by a highly complex mixture of apparently granitic intruded into metamorphic rocks, mainly quartz-biotite schistose. Diorite dikes and flows of various compositions - from felsic through intermediate to basaltic - are often observed along steep cliffs.

For the purpose of this particular work we studied the glacial and alluvial boulders, targeting the diamond-bearing kimberlites. Later study proved that the most of them being conglomerates of the Gowganda Formation. ^^^

o

EXPLORATION OBJECTIVE ^^^ a

The diamond-bearing kimberlite, are the main target of prospecting in the area, followed by gold and platinum-palladium mineralization. As mentioned above, the investigated' area is the part of the Lake Timiskaming Structural Zone which is interpreted (Sage, 1966) as a conduit through which kimberlite intruded.

T-010/01

T-011/01

T-012/01

T-013/01

T-014/01

T-015/01

,T-016701

T-017/01

T-018/01

T-019/01

T-020/01

T-021/01

T-022/01

5175370N; 1756640E Kimberlite or auto-breccia of basalt, strongly weathered with minor disseminated sulfides.

5176820N; 17567400E Conglomerate of Gowganda Formation

5176860N; 17567320E Conglomerate or tuffite, mixture of pyroclastic and sedimentary detritus in the felsic flow. Minor sulfides (chalcopyrite600yo, pyrite4007o) in small aggregation of fine grains.

5178000N; 17567315E Tuff in felsic flow with minor overimposed pyrite, both disseminated and in veinlets.

5176344N; 1756787IE Tuffo-conglomerate in felsic matrix. Initially mistaken for kimberlite.

5176920N; 17568045E minor oxided sulfides.

Intermediate flow, auto-brecciated with

5176876N; 17568036E Basalt breccia (or kimberlite?) with oxided sulfides, mica and numerous feldspar fragments.

5177230N; 17568243E Intermediate porphyritic flow with feldspar porphyroblasts in light-Grey aphanitic matrix.

5178857N; 17568243E Conglomerate of the Gowanda formation, mistaken for kimberlite.

5177447N; 17567766E Basaltic porphyry (kimberlite?) Up to 307o of sulfides, mostly disseminated, but a few aggregates as large as 2x3 cm were observed.

5177548N; 17567557E Lamprophyre (?) or weathered basal with calcite-filled almond-shaped inclusions.

5180330N; 17567343E Felsic flow with massive sulfides layers, probably massive volcanogenic sulfides. The total content of sulfide from 7 to 1407o. Pyrite 75, chalcopyrite 20"7o pyrrhotite 50Xo)

5180158N; 17563086E Felsic to intermediate flow with massive sulfides layers. The total content of sulfide from 7 to 1120xo. Pyrite 75, chalcopyrite 20^o pyrrhotite 507o)

f i ij!'

l

limonite KIM grains0-1 50th TO*

. 14 75th K He * 54 90thWto 0 9-21 96th %fle

9tth %i^e Fault

1:500000

Figure 32: Regional distribution of ilmenite KIM grains. Anomalous sites are labeled with the corresponding number of grains shown in brackets.

45

560000E 560000 600000 tJilUUUUt

Scale: 1:430000

41: Total magnetic Held of the study area (Gupta 1991). Labeled samples represent anomalies of different KIM types.

57

560000E 580000 800000 620000E

l

560000 E 560000 600000Lfloand

MMSiMrank0-5 less than 50th *Kife

**

8 90th^le9 95th Wto

10-11 96th %tle __ Fault

5 OF^E

Scale: 1:500 000

620000 E

S KDomatan

Figure 42: Regional distribution of MMSIM* indicators. Labeled anomalies were determined by level of rank (described in text) which is shown in brackets.

63

HOBBS TWP PROJECT

Project area was in hobbs twp on claims #1246945,1246514 A 1244701

I.Tchajkov was hired as geologist for this project

Project was started in April 2001 and completed in June 2001

I.Tchajkov spent 10 days in the field and 2 days report prep

Albert Leblanc spent 22 days in the field 10 days with I.Tchajkov as helper and 12 days prospecting with Dave Morrisson

Dave Morrisson spent 12 days in the field

During the course of this project many samples were taken,only the most interesting are described by I.Tchajkov.These were taken to Mike Cosec and G.Savage at MNDM and Ken Lappiere at JML Rescources and all agree that none are kimberlitic also that those samples with sulphides were not an indicator of any other minerals being in place.None of the samples were sent for assay.The main purpose of this project was to search for kimberlite.Report by S.E.Allan #6043 indicates that this area has potential.

I.Tchajkov used Albert Leblanc,s V2 ton truck to travel from his residence to profect area.

PROJECT COST

I.Tchajkov........................................................ 33000.00Albert Leblanc... 22 days X 3150.00 .............. 33300.00Dave Morrisson .. 12 days X 3150.00 .............. 31800.00I.Tchajkov ...,. travel from Sudbury, return ..236 klms X 10 days = 2360 X .50 per kim..... 31180.00Albert Leblanc 8c Dave Morrisson .. travel from Hagar return 12 days X 144 ^ 1728 X .50 = 3 864.00

ATV....... 22 days X 335.00................... 3770.00Mise expense .................... 3200.00

total 311114.00

June 17, 2001

To Whom It May Concern:

I,Tchajkov, M. Se has conducted prospecting, on behalf and expenses of Mr. Albert Leblanc. The project covered two closely placed, but separated prospects: the Hobbs Lake (HL) Southern and Hobbs Lake (HL) Northern.

The field works were conducted on intermittent basis from April 25, 2001 till June 8, 2001, total l O days. The office work takes 2 days.

We agreed on S250 per day fee. The total work will cost 12 x S250 * S3,000.

Mr. Leblanc paid me S500 on May, 10, 2001.

Thus, I would like to receive S2,J

Igor Tchajkov

DAYS IN FIELD

I. Tchjackov and Albert Leblanc April 1 3 A 1 427 ft 28

May 11 Se 1225 A 26

June

Albert Leblanc A Dave Morrisson April li Se 1225 k 26

May 18&1925 A 26

June l A 2 14&15

Albert Leblanc *fe Dave Morrisson prospected areas # 1.2.3&4 as shown on enclosed map,,

The property is located in the general area of sample #,s 431.441&443 of S.E. Allans report #6043 page 45,57*63.

ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES

Work Report Summary

Transaction No:

Recording Date:

Approval Date:

Client(s):

W0270.01884

2002-DEC-02

2003-APR-1 1

Status: APPROVED

Work Done from: 2001-APR-13

to: 2001-JUN-15

1 58262 LEBLANC, ALBERT JOSEPH

392746 MORRISON, DAVID LYLE

Survey Type(s):

GEOL

Work Report Details:

Claim*

S 1244701

S 1246495

S 1246514

External Credits:

Reserve:

Perform Perform Approve Applied

33,704 SO SO

83,705 3718 SO

33,705 3717 811,114

311,114 31,435 311,114

SO

SO Reserve of Work

SO Total Remaining

Applied Assign Approve Assign Approve Reserve

SO 33,704 0 SO

30 33,705 718 SO

S1.435 SO 0 SO

51,435 37,409 3718 SO

Report#: W0270.01884

Reserve Approve Due Date

SO 2003-MAR-29

SO 2003-MAR-29

SO 2003-MAR-29

SO

Status of claim is based on information currently on record.

41I16SE2008 2.24651 HOBBS 900

2003-May-01 16:00 Armstrong-d Page 1 of 1

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Date: 2003-APR-29

Ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE 933 RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, 6th FLOOR SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E 6B5

ALBERT JOSEPH LEBLANC GENERAL DELIVERY HAGAR, ONTARIO POM 1X0 CANADA

Tel: (888) 415-9845 Fax:(877)670-1555

Dear Sir or Madam

Submission Number: 2.24651 Transaction Number(s): W0270.01884

Subject: Approval of Assessment Work

We have approved your Assessment Work Submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached Work Report Summary indicates the results of the approval.

At the discretion of the Ministry, the assessment work performed on the mining lands noted in this work report may be subject to inspection and/or investigation at any time.

The 45 days outlined in the Notice dated February 25, 2003 have passed without the deficiencies being addressed. As indicated in the 45 day notice little information has been supplied with this submission. The critical information required for a prospecting submission is a report describing in detail the nature and content of the work and the observations made during performance of the work and a plan at a scale of between 1:100 and 1:5,000 showing traverses and observed features (not by circling 4 areas on a 1:40,000 scale claim map). There has been no credit allowed for prospecting.

The geological prospecting portion provided only minimal information. Several of the sample descriptions arefor samples located off the claims and we typically do not allow assessment credit for sample descriptionsonly. In this instance we have allowed the following credit:Labour - 3950Report - 5200Mileage-3165ATV 470Misc. - 350Total = 31,435

Assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the attached Work Report Summary. The assessment credit is being reduced by 39,679. The TOTAL VALUE of assessment credit that will be allowed, based on the information provided in this submission, is 31,435.

If you have any question regarding this correspondence, please contact bruce.gates@ndm.gov.on.ea or by phone at (705) 670-5856.

BRUCE GATES by email at

Visit our website at http://www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm Page: 1 Correspondence 10:18217

Ministry of Ministere duNorthern Development Developpement du Nordand Mines et des Mines

Yours Sincerely,

Ontario

Ron GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section

Cc: Resident Geologist Assessment File Library

Albert Joseph Leblanc Albert Joseph Leblanc (Claim Holder) (Assessment Office)

David Lyle Morrison (Claim Holder)

Visit our website at http://www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm Page:2 Correspondence 10:18217

Mininn l smH Tnnnro iviining Lanu i enure

IOo o

g a to en

to o o

574000E

—— S180000N

B17BOOON

S1TTOOON

6173000N

8171000N

57SOODE

*ncl Ihra^h Itn kGBl Land T*tat or RvgMn OK M, o' Iho Mi

General information and LimitationsMsp CHimnt NAOBJ

?*aPWr"SK UTM S* rtwalm?

nl kinwv BM ImeNnk Ml wrM Hvii*ling certain pattau. tf Mn.

M an] laid mwttui reiirlcl 6* wchiM hw *ntr} Ivatetn n**i9 tUln* (r

Date l Time of Issue: Wed Apr 30 09:16:23 EOT 2003

TOWNSHIP l AREA PLAN HOBBS G-2 914

ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS l DIVISIONS

Mining Division SudburyLand Titles/Registry Division NIPISSINGMinistry of Natural Resources District NORTH BAY

TOPOGRAPHIC Land TenureFrMtx*. Paotrt

[""j|j 8utta.ui Aw! Mv4ng Ki

r^j Surface IdghB QWy

r^~j Mr.ir.fi W W*t on*

Uasntwlfl Pa*™'

fjHI minnes Anti Mr*i9 W

[•l

nn Unas fcglSD*c*.xfU..If A1 Surtat* Anu Muiios Hi

f A"! BuHHM ni^rit* Only

lil

aW hi OWHK*] 1(49* UtNH! kl[ lt

l"*~-**~ ", UwPftBC-ifllm

L W ——— N. —— —— J

1 mMwr t

LAND TENURE WITHDt^WALS

IMPORTANT NOTICES

LAND TENURE WITHDRAWAL DESCRIPTIONS

Warn Jan l. MW PLEASE NOTE THE IS1.AND ON LAKE TEMASAW AflE WITHDRAWN AND WILL NOT

C Worn fnb M! loot -id hw'*" ttifx.VtfWA.mnlmaoY.enL-vrj-s warn A*' 0, ww

1TJ 1* M 4 a 1*5150(*t.t ISLANDS IN LAKE TEM 17W M i g 1WJISO (AU (EUNOD *W LftUG tCM

M*! 1*31 Si

minnl prowiwliiw. htnMna x

IMPORTANT NOTICES

2.24651 GEOL

MINING LAND TENURE

MAPFltCOBDtlfSOtfKi

K)MO

rr dtarcv- o. G*rMral Information and Lbnltattons IMBV-V r^^hODI tfvvAtH

llMtBi-ilMB

Date f Time of Issue Aug 18 2002

TOWNSHIP/AREA

HOBBS

10:37h Eastern

PLAN.2465 i2914ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS y DIVISIONSMining Division Sudbury Land Tittos'Registry Division NIPISSING Ministry of Natural Resources District NORTH BAY

TOPOGRAPHIC

Lj-.j AinhBtW* *h,ft*

a a

a

LAND TENURE

'la""".~™a r"~

* Oi*r

on

limn H oca**

oB -—B "•"."c*"

i iLAND TENURE WITHDRAWALS

mi HM w ml t y p

IMPORTANT NOTICES

LAND TENURE WITHDRAWAL DESCRIPTIONS

SlU WOT

(MB (w HUB*

W4-MM HMni SK HIM

*i mi turn DnanHW* TIM wu lv ir m*

LE*K*aTlllHI*UU0DHLMEI

IB Hi

tf (MIM

IU a Wll rOHt OUT Mo 1U" l

IMPORTANT NOTICESVm uttl* i* E* mHW FHMMIon^ IMi •HUH mi m\nH* atmonmoi toftmni.

t™_____DMctBim^^-^

kini mM Ihri rt id (wm* irDHi

lHMSt.UvRni'*"iil wb*tl*-!l*Ui(^li-. CcHld

•t nn^rMnujj HKnMn oBuBi knmannann.