horbury academy pupil premium strategy · to close the gap by providing additional supplementary...
TRANSCRIPT
HORBURY ACADEMY PUPIL PREMIUM STRATEGY
2019-2020
Horbury Academy Vision
Key Priority 1 Leading Success
Leaders at all levels demonstrate a relentless
focus on securing the best possible outcomes for young people across
the academy.
Key Priority 2 Achieving Success
All students (including identified groups) across all key stages secure at least good outcomes in relation to their starting
points
Key Priority 3 Securing Success
Teaching, learning and assessment are all highly
developed across all subjects and lead to
excellent outcomes and progress for all students
across all key stages.
Key Priority 4 Developing Success All colleagues are
supported to develop their practice and
pedagogy through continuous and
collaborative high quality professional
development and partnerships.
Key Priority 5 Standards for Success All students maintain
the highest standards for success across all aspects
of academy life.
Key Priority 6 Supporting Success
All students are supported to live
balanced, healthy lives that are rich with both
academic and extra- curricular opportunities.
Having reviewed the impact of our 2018-19 Pupil Premium spending, the Educational Endowment Foundation Pupil Premium Toolkit (EEF), the
National Foundation of Educational Research (NFER) ‘seven building blocks for success’ and our Horbury Academy vision and six key priorities;
these have been used to underpin our Pupil Premium strategy for 2019-20 and to inform effective use of premium funding.
1. Summary information
School Horbury Academy
Academic Year 2019-20 Total PP budget £254,885 Date of most recent PP Review 06/19
Total number of pupils 1063 Number of pupils eligible for PP
271 Date for next internal review of this strategy 01/20
Year PP overall number PP Male PP Female
7 57 30 27
8 52 26 26
9 55 38 17
10 60 28 32
11 54 30 24
Please note: Data is unvalidated until the publication of ASP.
2. Current Attainment (most recent year 11)
Data source: 4Matrix Data source: 4Matrix
Pupils eligible for PP Horbury Academy 2019
Pupils not eligible for PP National Benchmark 2019
All students PP and non-PP Horbury Academy 2019
Year 11 cohort size 56 201
Key Stage 2 fine level 4.46 4.76
% Attaining 5-9 in English (Best) and Maths
25% 50% 44%
% Attaining 4-9 in English (Best) and Maths
41% 64%
Progress 8 score average -0.71 0.13 -0.43
Progress 8 English -0.89 0.11 -0.6
Progress 8 Maths -0.37 0.12 -0.04
Progress 8 English Baccalaureate Slots -0.82 0.14 -0.5
Progress 8 Open Slots -0.72 0.12 -0.5
Progress 8 Males -0.8 -0.56
Progress 8 Females -0.61 -0.28
Progress 8 score average for Higher Ability pupils
-0.74 0.12
-0.48
Progress 8 average for Middle Ability pupils
-0.71 0.17
-0.38
Progress 8 average for Lower Ability pupils
-0.69 0.04
-0.43
Attainment 8 score average 32.46 49.96 42.34
% Entering the English Baccalaureate 12% 43% 29%
% English Baccalaureate average point score
2.64 3.66
% Attendance (all year groups) 92.1% 94.3%
% Persistently Absence (all year groups) 27.4% 15.1%
% Staying in education or entering employment after Key Stage 4
96.6% 97.6%
3. Barriers to future attainment (for pupils eligible for PP)
Academic barriers
A. Teaching and Learning: Staff understand and use strategies to improve teaching and learning and give appropriate intervention and support to help students learn.
B. Homework/Revision/Organisation: The in-school gap between Pupil Premium and Non-Pupil Premium students indicate they need extra support with homework and revision for examinations.
C. Numeracy: A higher proportion of students in the Pupil Premium group arrive with below average maths skills.
D. Literacy Reading Ages: A higher proportion of students in the Pupil Premium group arrive with below average English skills. The higher attainers underachieve in English compared with their middle and lower counterparts. Some students eligible for the Pupil Premium have reading ages significantly below their chronological reading age
Additional barriers
D. Pastoral: Many students have EBD, social skills difficulties, lack of home support, lack of breakfast, incorrect uniform and require counselling/mentoring and tailored intervention courses e.g. mental health and/or anger management.
E. Alternative Provision: an appropriate and varied curriculum is devised to support all disadvantaged learners to succeed and reduce rates of internal and external exclusion.
F. Attendance: An attendance gap exists between Pupil Premium students and Non Pupil Premium students, (in particular PA students).
G. Enrichment and Aspirations: Many of our Pupil Premium students have had fewer life experiences and have not taken part in the same breadth of events as Non-Pupil Premium students e.g. enrichment activities, school trips, sports teams and student leadership groups.
4. Intended outcomes (specific outcomes and how they will be measured) Success criteria
A. To close the gap by providing additional supplementary literacy support thereby raising the attainment of those students.
Gap between PP and national others decreases at GCSE.
B. To close the gap by providing additional supplementary numeracy support thereby raising the attainment of those students.
Gap between PP and national others decreases at GCSE.
C. Disadvantaged students do not feel ‘disadvantaged’ and are supported to achieve. PP students better equipped to navigate Academy life and beyond.
D. High quality wave one teaching for all students. Effective data driven intervention which supports students learning. Disadvantaged students feel supported, behave well and complete homework and revision.
Gap between PP and national others decreases at GCSE. Data demonstrates rates of exclusions for Disadvantaged students are in line or lower than national others.
E. Disadvantaged students access a variety of alternative provision tailored to their individual needs. Gap between PP and national others decreases at GCSE. Reduced NEET figures. Reduced rates of internal and external exclusion.
F. To improve and secure attendance that is at or above national others for disadvantaged students, thereby significantly reducing Persistent Absence (PA).
PP attendance in line with National others.
G. Disadvantaged students experience a range of extra- curricular activities and have opportunities to participate in school trips and post 16 events.
Opportunities to participate in wider experiences leads to an increase in aspirations as demonstrated by destination data.
5. Strategies to overcome barriers
Academic year 2019-20
i. Quality of teaching for all
Action Intended outcome What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?
How will you ensure it is implemented well?
Staff lead
When will you review implementation?
Disadvantaged First
strategy that is a
proactive approach to
ensure disadvantaged
pupils come first in all
we do
Whole school consistency
around key strategies for
disadvantaged students and
wave 1 and 2 subject specific
strategies embedded across all
subjects and all year groups.
Key strategies are; Quality First
Teaching and Assessment,
Curriculum, Outcomes,
Attendance, Behaviour,
Parents, Pastoral and
Enrichment
To work towards closing the P8 gap between disadvantaged students and non-disadvantaged students.
Pupil Premium strategy is at the heart of
academy life and is led well at all
leadership levels. A clear strategy for
disadvantaged students at all levels.
CORE subjects have a disadvantaged lead.
An increased awareness of the individual
barriers/needs of disadvantaged students
and a plan to meet these needs at
KS3/KS4.
The premium will be used to fund:
• Staff CPD to embed the strategy
• Leadership CPD/AIM meetings
• EE documentation
• Active leadership – proactive, supportive, constant presence around academy.
- Assistant principal leads
Disadvantaged First.
- Disadvantaged leads
appointed in CORE.
- ‘Pupil Premium
Champions’ Staff Group.
- Subject specific wave 1
and 2 strategies outlined in
all subjects.
- SLT/MLT line
management meetings.
- Subject AIM (Accord
Impact Meetings) following
Data Points focused on PP
students.
SC
- Subject AIM
following Data
Points at KS4.
- Monthly through
Accord PP meeting
- Termly through SLT
Quality Assurance –
lesson visits, learning
capture, work
scrutiny.
- 2020 outcomes.
EEF Research
EEF Guide, June 2019 – ‘When it is most effective, the Pupil Premium will sit at the heart of a whole school effort, with all staff understanding the strategy and their role within it.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Aspiration interventions Moderate Moderate
Behaviour interventions Moderate Moderate
Parental engagement
Moderate
Moderate
Disadvantaged First –
Quality First Teaching
and Learning
To work towards closing the P8 gap
between disadvantaged students
and non-disadvantaged students
through teaching staff, leaders and
support staff trained on best
practices when working with
different groups of disadvantaged
learners.
Teachers receive regular bespoke
CPD on high quality Teaching and Learning, assessment and feedback for all learners. This will develop the work of the Sutton Trust and embed the Accord Classroom including collaborative learning.
Continued rigorous and challenging
teaching across the academy to
improve progress and outcomes for
all pupils. Expected closing of PP gap
as PP students benefit the most when
the quality of teaching improves.
The premium will be used to fund:
• Staff CPD to embed the
strategy
• Active leadership – proactive,
supportive, constant presence
around academy
• Part funding staffing with key responsibilities.
- EduDash/ Learning walks.
- Work scrutinies. - SLT/MLT line management
minutes and paired learning
walks.
- Data Point analysis of cohorts for each year. - CPD – staff questionnaires.
- Student voice.
SC - Half termly analysis
of learning walks and
work scrutinies
leading to
personalised CPD
support.
- Termly data points
and outcomes.
- 2020 outcomes.
EEF Research
EEF Guide, June 2019 – ‘Good teaching is the most important lever schools have to improve outcomes for disadvantaged pupils’. ‘Spending on improving teaching might
include professional development, training and support for early career teachers and recruitment and retention. Ensuring an effective teacher is in front of every class,
and that every teacher is supported to keep on improving, is the key ingredient of a successful school and should rightly be the top priority for Pupil
Premium spending.’
EEF evidence on collaborative learning – ‘The impact of collaborative approaches on learning is consistently positive. However, the size of impact varies, so it is important to get the detail right. Effective collaborative learning requires much more than just sitting pupils together and asking them to work in a group; structured approaches with well-designed tasks lead to the greatest learning gains… Approaches which promote talk and interaction between learners result in the best gains.’ EEF evidence on feedback – ‘Feedback studies tend to show very high effects on learning. Feedback is information given to the learner or teacher about the learner’s performance relative to learning goals or outcomes. It should aim towards (and be capable of producing) improvement in students’ learning.’ High impact for low cost.
Intervention Cost Impact
Collaborative learning Low Moderate
Feedback Low High
Mastery learning Low Moderate
Five A Day strategy All disadvantaged pupils are adequately equipped and ready to learn so that there is no gap between equipment for PP and Non-PP to impede on pupil premium students ability to access learning.
Disadvantaged pupils receive more behaviour logs for equipment and uniform. ‘Five A Day’ is aimed at disadvantaged learners to ensure they are adequately supported in lessons. The premium will be used to fund:
• Equipment – ‘Five A Day’
• Uniform
• Revision Guides/resources
- Behaviour logs monitored
for equipment sanctions.
- Link meetings with PYLs.
- Learning mentor and
parental support where
necessary.
- Daily Purple Line checks,
so immediate support
available.
SG - Through daily Purple
Line checks, and PYL
updates through
BROMCOM
-QA of PYL updates and actions at least fortnightly
EEF Research
EEF Guide, June 2019 – ‘Wider strategies relate to the most significant non-academic barriers to success within school.’
Disadvantaged First –
Developing leaders
To work towards closing the P8 gap between disadvantaged students and non-disadvantaged students through bespoke CPD for all leaders. Leadership CPD will focus on gaining consistency with leading on effective impact.
Consistency with leading impact and what
this looks like across all leaders will help
to close the gap.
The premium will be used to fund:
• Leadership weekend conference
• Follow up leadership meetings
• Part funding staffing with key
responsibilities.
- Leadership weekend launch (Sept 2019) - Leadership impact Flow Chart introduced. - SLT/Middle leadership paired learning walks and meetings to review impact. - Follow up leadership meetings.
NW/SC - EduDash learning
walks and work
scrutinies.
- SLT/middle leader
meetings.
- Whole school Data
Point analysis.
- 2020 Outcomes.
EEF Research
EEF Guide, June 2019 – ‘When it is most effective, the Pupil Premium will sit at the heart of a whole school effort, with all staff understanding the strategy and their role within it.’
Total budgeted cost £69,640
ii. Targeted support
Action Intended outcome What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?
How will you ensure it is implemented well?
Staff lead When will you review implementation?
Disadvantaged First –
Accord AIM meetings.
To implement the new AIM meetings to rapidly identify underachievement amongst our disadvantaged students and to enable tailoring of intervention to specific subject areas and barriers to work towards closing the P8 gap between disadvantaged and nondisadvantaged students.
Staff are able to access a wide range of up-to-date PP data to enable them to act proactively with disadvantaged students. The data will help inform the Disadvantaged First strategy within subject areas and will allow a greater understanding of cohorts and barriers in order to enable bespoke intervention to be put in place. AIM meetings focus on years 7-11. The premium will be used to fund:
• Staff CPD
• 4Matrix
- Subject AIM meetings (half termly). - Attainment AIM meetings (3 weekly). - AP/PYL meetings. - 4Matrix data analysis. - SLT/MLT link meetings. - Fortnightly Director meetings with the Principal. - Continuous professional development (CPD) to support.
SB - Termly data point analysis.
- Fortnightly AIM meetings.
- 2020 outcomes.
EEF Research
EEF Guide, June 2019 – ‘Evidence consistently shows the positive impact targeted academic support can have.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Feedback Low High
Literacy support – KS3 Reading Matters intervention PP
students whose reading age falls
below 9.6 to take part in the
volunteers reading programme.
Students are tested regularly and
also re-tested for any dips over
the course of the year.
Supplemented with Catch-up Premium and interlinked with Year 7 Catch Up Strategy.
Reading Matters intervention This
intervention is designed to stimulate
the engagement and progress of key
PP students with reading, with a
specific focus on boys.
The premium will be used to fund:
• Hertfordshire Reading Test
resources
• Reading resources
• Part funding for staff with key responsibilities
- Weekly reading
support with external
volunteers and this year we
are trialling student
volunteers who are trained.
Runs over 8-10 weeks.
- Regular testing and
retesting using the
Hertfordshire Reading Test.
N Waters
-Half termly report with data analysis. - 6 months+ improvement minimum.
KS3 ‘Step Up’ Programme
Students identified work on
literacy and life skills to improve
their confidence throughout KS3.
Supplemented with Catch-up
Premium and interlinked with
Year 7 Catch Up Strategy.
KS3 ‘Step Up’ Programme
KS3 students with literacy, behavioural
and/or confidence barriers identified
and work in a small group on literacy
and life skills with the SENCO.
The premium will be used to fund:
Literacy resources
- Module assessments are planned into the Scheme of Work.
VM - Module assessment scores. - English data for identified cohort.
Targetted group in English –
Years 8 and 9
An additional group created to
support students with literacy
with lead practitioner or head of
Department.
Targetted group in English – Years 8
and 9
A higher proportion of students in the
Pupil Premium group arrive with
below average English skills. Some
students eligible for the Pupil
Premium have reading ages
significantly below their chronological
reading age
The premium will be used to fund:
• Specific literacy resources
linked to planned schemes of
work
• Reading resources
• Part funding for staff with key responsibilities
- Module
assessments are planned
into the Scheme of Work.
- SLT/MLT link meetings
DK - Termly data
point analysis.
- Module assessment scores.
EEF Research
EEF Guide, June 2019 – ‘Evidence consistently shows the positive impact targeted academic support can have.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Behaviour interventions Moderate Moderate
Peer tutoring Low Moderate
Social, emotional learning Moderate Moderate
Individualised instruction Low Moderate
Numeracy support –
KS3
Maths mentoring scheme
PP students identified through KS2 SATs to be below expected progress (below 95) are to receive one-to-one maths support through a cohort of student maths mentors. To be trialled initially with Year 7 and supplemented with Catch-up Premium and interlinked with Year 7 Catch Up Strategy.
Maths mentoring scheme
This intervention is designed to
stimulate the engagement and
progress of key PP students in
Maths, with a specific focus on
boys.
The premium will be used to fund:
Specific numeracy
resources linked to
planned schemes of
work
- Identification of PP cohort using KS2
Maths data.
- Baseline testing to identify areas of
focus.
- Training of Maths mentors.
- 8-10 week programme of
mentoring.
- Exit testing to ascertain impact.
CF - Termly data point
analysis.
- Module assessment scores.
Additional groups in Maths – Y7
PP students identified through KS2 Maths SATs to have achieved a score of 95 and below are to receive additional maths support through the creation of an additional class and supplemented with Catch-up Premium and interlinked with Year 7 Catch Up Strategy.
Additional groups in Maths – Y7
A higher proportion of students
in the Pupil Premium group
arrive with below average maths
skills.
SumDog (KS3) learning platform
and targeted use of Hegarty
Maths
The premium will be used to fund:
• SumDog and Hegarty Maths
• Part funding for staff with
key responsibilities
- Module assessments are planned
into the Scheme of Work.
- SLT/MLT link meetings
CF - Termly data point
analysis.
- Module assessment scores.
EEF Research
EEF Guide, June 2019 – ‘Evidence consistently shows the positive impact targeted academic support can have.’
EEF Research: Intervention Cost Impact
Peer tutoring Low Moderate
Individualised instruction Low Moderate
Feedback Low High
Supporting Success –
Year 11
To work towards closing the P8 gap between disadvantaged students and non-disadvantaged students.
Through Year 11 Subject AIMs, PP students identified as below expected progress in individual subjects will be placed into smaller cohort interventions to support their progress with specific skills/topics. Examples include: - Period 1 and targeted period 7(led by experienced teachers). - Bespoke curriculum time. - Subject masterclasses.
The premium will be used to
fund:
Holiday/weekend sessions.
• Online learning platforms: Hegarty maths, SumDog.
• Parent conference
• Rewards
• Staffing and running of
- Subject AIM meetings used to identify key PP students in need of intervention. - Attendance to P1 and P7 tracked. - Data Point analysis. - Access and progress on learning platforms tracked and analysed for PP students. - SLT presence and learning walks for QA. - Faculty CPD for QA. - SLT/MTL Link meetings.
SB - Half termly Subject
AIMs – data
reviewing.
- Termly data points. - 2020 outcomes. - Edudash learning walks.
AIM meetings
EEF Research
EEF Guide, June 2019 – ‘Evidence consistently shows the positive impact targeted academic support can have.’
EEF evidence on extending the school day – ‘The evidence indicates that, on average, pupils make two additional months' progress per year from extended school time and in particular through the targeted use of before and after school programmes. There is some evidence that disadvantaged pupils benefit more, making closer to three months’ additional progress.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Extended school time Moderate Low
Collaborative learning Low Moderate
Feedback Low High
Individualised instruction Low Moderate
Supporting Success –
Years 7, 8, 9 and 10
To work towards closing the P8
gap between disadvantaged
students and non-disadvantaged
students in a long term approach
to support.
For cohorts completing a
qualification in Year 10, the same
AIM process as for year 11
students will take place.
Through the new assessment methodology, any disadvantaged
student identified as making below expected progress will receive targeted intervention to close gaps in learning. Examples include: - time following hinge assessments to ‘fill in the gaps’ in learning through use of purple pen - Targeted Period 7 - Subject masterclasses The premium will be used to fund:
• Online learning platforms: Hegarty maths, SumDog.
• Staffing and running of AIM
meetings
- Subject AIM meetings used to identify key PP students in need of intervention. - AP/PYL student AIM meetings. - Attendance at interventions tracked. - Data Point analysis. - Access and progress on learning platforms tracked and analysed for PP students. - SLT presence and learning walks for QA. - Faculty CPD for QA. - SLT/MLT Link meetings
SB -Regular review at
SLT link meetings.
-Half termly by
curriculum leaders.
-Year 10 AIM meetings.
EEF Research
EEF Guide, June 2019 – ‘Evidence consistently shows the positive impact targeted academic support can have.’
EEF evidence on extending the school day – ‘The evidence indicates that, on average, pupils make two additional months' progress per year from extended school time and in particular through the targeted use of before and after school programmes. There is some evidence that disadvantaged pupils benefit more, making closer to three months’ additional progress.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Extended school time Moderate Low
Collaborative learning Low Moderate
Feedback Low High
Individualised instruction Low Moderate
Transition support One-to-one support for disadvantaged students through the transition process from primary school to Horbury Academy to ensure that students are prepared for their move to Horbury Academy and parents/carers are engaged with the Academy.
Where students and parents/carers are happy with their transition move, this will lead to greater engagement in education. Ofsted KS3: The Wasted Years? stressed the need for schools to prioritise the pastoral AND academic needs of pupils during transition from primary school. The premium will be used to fund:
• One to one transition meetings
• No Wasted Weeks programme including launch event at Horbury Academy
• Holiday Homework resources
-One to one transition meetings before taster day with student and parents/carers -No Wasted Weeks KS2-KS3 transition programme -Contact home where needed -Structured support re: holiday homework -Extra transition taster visit -Literacy and numeracy support as part of Catch Up Strategy. -EWO to target PA disadvantaged families in year 6 for support
SC -During and after the transition process
EEF Guide, June 2019 – ‘Evidence consistently shows the positive impact targeted academic support can have.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Individualised instruction Low Moderate
Parental engagement Moderate Moderate
Homework Low Moderate
Homework and
revision support
- Homework Club
- Revision support
- Peer tutoring
To work towards closing the P8 gap between disadvantaged students and non-disadvantaged students through offering support for students with homework and revision.
Support in place for disadvantaged students who struggle to organise their homework, complete their homework, access their homework, organise their revision, strategies for revision and/or use revision strategies to retain revision. A range of strategies to be used, including trailing subject peer tutors. The premium will be used to fund:
• Show My Homework package • Staffing with key responsibilities
- Use of AIM meetings and assessment/PPE data to identify students struggling with revision strategies. - Use of and analysis of Show My Homework. - Interventions put in place. - Student voice.
CC - Data point analysis.
EEF evidence on homework – ‘The evidence shows that the impact of homework, on average, is five months' additional progress.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Individualised instruction Low Moderate
Total budgeted cost £18,726
iii. Other approaches
Action Intended outcome What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?
How will you ensure it is implemented well?
Staff lead
When will you review implementation?
Disadvantaged First –
Pastoral support
New ‘HUB’ intervention rooms
To work towards bringing attendance, behaviour and exclusions data of all disadvantaged students at the academy in line with national and higher than 2018-2019.
Many students have EBD, social skills
difficulties, lack of home support, lack
of breakfast, incorrect uniform and
require counselling/mentoring and
tailored intervention courses e.g.
mental health and/or anger
management to ensure the
foundations are in place to allow our
disadvantaged students to improve
their attendance and reduce their
behaviour and exclusion rates.
The premium will be used to fund:
• Mental health practitioner
• Targeted resources for HUB
intervention rooms
• Staffing with key responsibilities
-Appointment of a new
Inclusion Co-ordinator
(Sept 2019) who will lead 1-
2-1 and small group
sessions in the ‘HUB’ and
work with outside agencies
and Academy colleagues.
-SEMH interventions to be
supported through a
structured timetable,
including: BEAM (anger
management), smoking
intervention, social skills, hygiene, and safeguarding e.g. online and restorative practice.
SG -QA of Inclusion updates and actions at least fortnightly. -Termly review of range of strategies.
EEF Research
EEF evidence on behaviour interventions – ‘Evidence suggests that, on average, behaviour interventions can produce moderate improvements in academic
performance along with a decrease in problematic behaviours.’
EEF evidence on small group tuition – ‘Overall, evidence shows that small group tuition is effective and, as a rule of thumb, the smaller the group the better. Tuition in groups of two has a slightly higher impact than in groups of three, but a slightly lower impact than one to one tuition. Some studies suggest that greater feedback from the teacher, more sustained engagement in smaller groups, or work which is more closely matched to learners’ needs explains this impact.’ – Moderate impact.
Intervention Cost Impact
Behaviour interventions Moderate Moderate
Social and emotional learning Moderate Moderate
Small group tuition Moderate Moderate
Disadvantaged First –
Pastoral
New California Drive provision
To work towards bringing attendance, behaviour and exclusions data of all disadvantaged students at the academy in line with national and higher than 2018-2019.
Alternative provision is defined as
something a young person
participates in as part of their regular
timetable, away from the Academy.
We use provisions to prevent
exclusions, prevent NEETs or to
reengage pupils in their education.
Bespoke timetables, interventions and
alternative provision is used where
required. PP funding is used to access
external support and off site provision.
The premium will be used to fund:
• Targeted resources for California Drive provision
• Staffing with key responsibilities, for example mental health practitioner
-Appointment of a new California Drive Coordinator (Jan 2020) who will lead this provision.
SG -QA of Inclusion
updates and actions
at least fortnightly.
-Termly report.
EEF Research
EEF evidence on behaviour interventions – ‘Evidence suggests that, on average, behaviour interventions can produce moderate improvements in academic
performance along with a decrease in problematic behaviours.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Behaviour interventions Moderate Moderate
Social and emotional learning Moderate Moderate
Small group tuition Moderate Moderate
Disadvantaged First –
Pastoral
Year 11 mentoring
Programme
To work towards closing the P8
gap between disadvantaged
students and non-disadvantaged
students.
To work towards bringing
attendance, behaviour and
exclusions data of all
disadvantaged students at the
academy in line with national and
higher than 2018-2019.
Studies have found that a structured
mentoring programme, where mentors
are trained and supported, can have a
positive impact on disadvantaged
pupils. With weekly mentor meetings
and a whole school focus on the fifteen
year 11 mentees that runs up to their
final exams in June 2020 students will
have the structures in place to revise
and resilience and raised aspirations to
succeed in their 2020 exams.
The premium will be used to fund:
• CPD for mentors
• Revision resources for all
mentees
-Mentoring programme
overseen by Senior Leader
leading Disadvantaged
First.
-All mentors trained. -15
key year 11
disadvantaged students
chosen based on data and
barriers.
-Information shared with all
staff and acted on at a
curriculum level.
-Regular review of impact. -Mentoring continues up to final exams.
SC -Review of progress
data at data points. -
Weekly mentor
reports.
-2020 outcomes.
EEF Research
EEF evidence on mentoring – ‘Studies have found positive impacts for pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds, and for non-academic outcomes such as attitudes to school, attendance and behaviour.’ ‘Positive effects tend not to be sustained once the mentoring stops, so care must be taken to ensure that benefits are not lost.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Mentoring Moderate Low
Pupil Premium Plus strategy
Pupil premium plus pupils to
make progress in line with peers.
The attendance, behaviour and exclusions of all pupil premium plus students at the academy remain better than national.
Research from the charity Adoption UK
found that adopted pupils could be up
to 20 times more likely to be excluded.
Ability to meet complex and
individualised needs of Pupil Premium
Plus pupils.
-Vice Principal oversees
PP+ strategy
-Regular reporting of PP+
strategy progress through
SLT meeting
SG -Progress of pupils at data points -Half-termly via internal inclusion and attendance data.
Parent’s Evenings: Increase the attendance of disadvantaged parents/carers at all Parents’ Evenings Years 7-11: - Phones calls home to PP - Appointment support for PP
-Use of MCAS App
The premium will be used to fund:
• MCAS app
• Parents’ Evening resources
-Tracking of appointments. -Attendance figures for parents’ evenings. -Improved figures where there are two evenings over a year.
JJ After each parents evening – attendance figures analysed.
EEF Research
EEF evidence on behaviour interventions – ‘Parental and community involvement programmes are often associated with reported improvements in school ethos or
discipline and so are worth considering as alternatives to direct behaviour interventions.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Behaviour interventions
Moderate Moderate
Social and emotional l earning Moderate Moderate
Small group tuition Moderate Moderate
Disadvantaged First -
Attendance
The attendance, behaviour and exclusions of all pupil premium pupils at the academy remain better than national.
Evidence has shown that improving attendance can remove one of the most significant non-academic barriers to success. The more time a child spends around other children, whether in the classroom or as part of a school team or club, the more chance they have of making friends and feeling included, boosting social skills, confidence and self-esteem and having a direct impact of achievement.
The premium will be used to fund:
• Attendance rewards • Attendance ‘breakfast club’
-Data analysis. -KIT Reports. -EWO records on CPOMs and with LA. -Fast track records. -Penalty notice issued. -Student tracking.
SG -Weekly analysis. -Daily updates
and reports
through
Bromcom.
-QA of PYL updates and actions at least fortnightly.
Individualised instruction Mod Mod
Feedback Mod High
Disadvantaged First -
Enrichment
To improve the knowledge, cultural capital and aspirations of disadvantaged pupils
Many Pupil Premium students have had fewer life experiences and have not taken part in the same breadth of events as Non-Pupil Premium students e.g. enrichment activities, school trips, sports teams and student leadership groups which build the Cultural Capital which is essential for success at school. The premium will be used to fund:
• Horbury Academy ‘Passport of experiences’ which includes contribution of funding towards enrichment activities
• Part staffing enrichment clubs • York St John University
outreach work
-PP participation tracked via BROMCOM -Standard trips letters to guide parents on how to apply for financial support -Student questionnaires -PYL intervention re: enrichment take up rates
JJ -Termly analysis of participation rates and feedback through questionnaires.
EEF Research
EEF evidence on sports participation – ‘The overall impact of sports participation on academic achievement tends to be positive … (about two additional months’
progress).’
Intervention
Cost Impact
Sports participation Moderate Low
Careers Support Disadvantaged pupils of all abilities are prepared for college/job/university interviews. NEET figures decrease on 2018/19.
Year 10 Mock Interview Day and Wakefield College/ Ossett Sixth Form College taster days. Pupils are prepared for interviews through bespoke Period 1 activities, leading up to an interview with feedback by an external interviewer. PP analysis of scores will lead to additional support with the process
-External stakeholder feedback -NEET figures -Destinations data -Careers advisor intervention program for PP students underperforming tracked
DG -Analysis of stakeholder feedback, NEET figures and destination data.
and followed by a re-interview to show improvement.
The premium will be used to fund:
• Part staffing careers advisor
• Year 10 Mock Interview Day
• Wakefield College/ Accord Sixth Form College taster days.
EEF Research
EEF evidence on aspiration interventions – ‘Most young people have high aspirations for themselves. Ensuring that students have the knowledge and skills to progress towards their aspirations is likely to be more effective than intervening to change the aspirations themselves.’
Intervention Cost Impact
Aspiration interventions Moderate Moderate
Feedback Low High
Individualised instruction Low Moderate
Small group tuition Moderate Moderate
Total budgeted cost £226,404
Overall budgeted cost 2019-2020 £314,770