hot lanes on i-77

21
HOT Lanes on I-77 A commuter’s perspective Dec 11, 2012

Upload: uta-boyle

Post on 03-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

HOT Lanes on I-77. A commuter’s perspective. Dec 11, 2012. The Problem. Phase 2: Single GP lane in both directions from exit 28 to exit 36: ~$75M. Phase 1: Single GP lane in both directions from I-485 to exit 28: ~$50M. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HOT Lanes on I-77

HOT Lanes on I-77A commuter’s perspective

Dec 11, 2012

Page 2: HOT Lanes on I-77

The Problem

Phase 1: Single GP lane in both directions from I-485 to exit 28:

~$50M

Phase 2: Single GP lane in both directions from exit 28 to exit

36: ~$75M

Source: Meeting with Bill Coxe, Sept 20, 2012; “I-77 HOT Discussion with Cornelius Town Board”, email from Bill Coxe to Andrew Grant, Oct. 10, 2012

Page 3: HOT Lanes on I-77

The Initial Solution

Source: “I-77 Feasibility Study HOV-HOT Lanes Conversion”, Parsons- Brinkerhoff, May 6, 2010

Page 4: HOT Lanes on I-77

Current Funding

Now that $27M + $15M have materialized, what if…

Source: MUMPO 2012- 2018 TIP, Adopted

Page 5: HOT Lanes on I-77

We Used It For GP Lanes?

A $13M Gap Keeps Us From a General Purpose Lane, Phase 1

Page 6: HOT Lanes on I-77

The Initial Proposal – TIP 5405 HOT

Source: “I-77 Feasibility Study HOV-HOT Lanes Conversion”, Parsons- Brinkerhoff, May 6, 2010

But the initial proposal did not have enough toll paying miles in it, so…

Add HOT Lanes

Convert HOV to

HOT Lanes

Page 7: HOT Lanes on I-77

The Current Proposal

Source: “I-77 HOT Lanes Project Overview NCSITE Lunch N’ Learn”, August 21, 2012; “I-77 Widening Update”, MUMPO (Bill Coxe), Sept 19, 2012

Let’s look at the projects in Mecklenburg…

5405 & 3311C

27 Miles of HOT Lanes

Cost: $513M

Page 8: HOT Lanes on I-77

5405

HOV–HOT Lane $7M

2nd HOT Lane $50M

Source: MUMPO 2012- 2018 TIP (Adopted); KRN Analysis

Page 9: HOT Lanes on I-77

3311C

Issue Cost

I-277 Connector $$$$M

Widen Lanes $16.5M

Environmental $$$

Source: I- 3311E; “I-77 Local Officials Meeting”, August 1, 2012

Page 10: HOT Lanes on I-77

The Current Proposal

?

Page 11: HOT Lanes on I-77

The Real Cost of HOT Lanes

HOT Lanes Require $300M+ Investment- 6X GP Lanes

Items in Red- No benefit to LKN

The HOT Lane

Financial Model

Requires Substantial Additional

Investments

Source: ibid, I-77 HOV- HOT Lane Conversion Fact Sheet, Mar 10, 2010

HOT Lanes GP Lanes

Construction 50.0$ 50.0$

HOV-HOT Conversion

13.0$ -$

Additional HOT Lane

50.0$ -$

Widen Lanes in Charlotte

16.5$ -$

I-277 Connector $$$$ -$

Environmental Issues

$$$

HOT Lane Operating Cost

100.0$ -$

P3 Profit 100.0$ -$

Center Dropdown Lanes

$$$ -$

Total: 329.5$ 50.0$

Phase 1: Widening I-77 from Exit 23 to Exit 28

Page 12: HOT Lanes on I-77

HOT Lanes GP Lanes Do Nothing

Construction 50.0$ 50.0$ -$

HOV-HOT Conversion

13.0$ -$ -$

Widen Lanes in Charlotte

16.5$ -$ -$

Additional HOT Lane

50.0$ -$ -$

HOT Lane Operating Cost

100.0$ -$ -$

P3 Profit 100.0$ -$ -$

Center Dropdown Lanes

$$$ -$ -$

Brookshire Interchange

$$$$ -$ -$

Total: 329.5$ 50.0$ -$

Phase 1: Widening I-77 from Exit 23 to Exit 28

About That $50M GP Lane…

$37M Public Funds +

$13M funding gap…

…that end up costing us over $300M!!

Page 13: HOT Lanes on I-77

HOT Lanes and Congestion

HOT lanes rely on congestion

More congestion = more profit

Page 14: HOT Lanes on I-77

HOT Lane Options

HOT Lane Restriction

Highest Throughput

Best for P3

Lower Cost

Lowest Throughput

HOT Lane

Capacity

Low: 2 PPV High: 3 PPV

Low: 1 Lane

High: 2 Lanes

“HOV 2+ require substantial subsidies from the state”

Source: “I-77 Feasibility Study HOV-HOT Lanes Conversion”, Parsons- Brinkerhoff, May 6, 2010

Page 15: HOT Lanes on I-77

HOT Lanes & Congestion

HOT lanes are expected to have “minimal impact to the travel speed in the existing general purpose lanes.”- “Comments on Environmental Documents for TIP

Projects I-3311 C and I-4750 HOT”, MUMPO memo dated October 4, 2012

HOT Lanes Will Ensure Congestion, Not Relieve It

Page 16: HOT Lanes on I-77

HOT Lanes & the Future

Unplanned Revenue Impacting Facility

Compensation Event

Source: “I-77 HOT Lane Project Discussion with Cornelius Town Board”, email from Bill Coxe to Andrew Grant, October 15, 2012

Page 17: HOT Lanes on I-77

HOT Lanes and Our Future Q: “Will there ever be an opportunity to

construct GP lanes along I-77 under the P3 scenario?”

A: “The answer is technically “yes” but it would almost certainly cost the public much more than the cost of construction and… it would be an ongoing cost through the remaining life of the contract.”

Source: “I-77 HOT Lane Project Discussion with Cornelius Town Board”, email from Bill Coxe to Andrew Grant, October 15, 2012

HOT Lanes Put Us in a Contractual Straightjacket

Page 18: HOT Lanes on I-77

HOT Lanes on I-77:HOT Lanes on I-77:

Cost more- much more- than GP lanes Require additional improvements with

no benefits to LKN commuters Ensure congestion instead of relieving it Preclude additional GP lanes Limit our ability to improve other roads Lock us into an agreement with a

private company for 50years

Page 19: HOT Lanes on I-77

I-77: A Commuter’s Perspective

Has never been widened in ~40 years Serves one of the fastest growing regions in

the state Is the only four lane interstate in

Mecklenburg County Is now the most congested four lane in the

state and…

…is set to become the first HOT lane in the county

Page 20: HOT Lanes on I-77

What Should We Do?

Town Commissioners

LNTC

State Elected Officials

Constituents

Page 21: HOT Lanes on I-77

What Can I Do?

Wideni77.org

[email protected]

Wideni77 FB page

Follow! Email! Like! Engage!