how can we…? connecting inventive social research with ... · (chen et al 2016; julier and...
TRANSCRIPT
-
How can we…? Connecting inventive social research with social and
government innovation
LucyKimbell
AfterwordinNoortjeMarres,MichaelGuggenheimandAlexWilkie(eds).2018.
InventingtheSocial.Manchester:MatteringPress.
Pleasecitefrompublishedversion,notthisone.
Intheirintroductiontheeditorsarguethatinventiveapproachestosocial
researchcombine“thedoing,representingandinterveningintosociallife”
(Marresetal,ppxx).Theyemphasisehowsociallife–andresearch–existsinthe
makingandforegroundwhyinventiveapproachesshouldbeexperimental.The
carryingoutandassessmentofsuchexperimentationindoing,representingand
interveningintosociallifeisalwaysinquestion.Theyargueforthevalueof
(researchers)pursuinglong-termassociationsandchangestosociallife.But
theypointtothelimitationsofprioritisingeasilytraceable,short-term
associationsbetweensocialresearchandsocialactionwhichmightresult,for
example,inDasKapitalnotbeingseenasabletodemonstrateresearchimpactor
policyrelevance.
Thisafterwordexplorestheseideasinrelationtotwocontemporarydomainsof
sociallifeinwhichsuchcreativeexperimentationisevident.Itsuggestshow
inventivesocialresearchasdiscussedinthisvolumemightintersectwith
developmentsinthefieldsofsocialinnovationandgovernmentinnovation.
-
SocialinnovationisoneofthenewsocialsidentifiedbyMarresandGerlitzin
theirchapter,atermgiventoanareaofpracticeandscholarshipthataimsto
addresssocialneedsthroughcreatingstrategies,infrastructures,ventures,
productsorservicesthatinvolvenewconfigurationsofresources(Mulganetal
2006;NichollsandMurdock2011).Acloselyrelatedareaofgovernment
innovationisanemerginginstitutionalpracticewithinnational,regionaland
localgovernmentadministrations,oftenintheformof‘policylabs’(egOECD
2016;Putticketal2014;Williams2015).Insuchsettings,diverseactors
includinggovernments,communityorganisations,fundersandbusinesses
conductexperimentsintocontemporarysociallife,sometimesincollaboration
withacademicresearchers.Inboth,thedevicesandpracticesof‘socialdesign’
areincreasinglyvisibleasaresourcetodrivecreativityandconnectpublic
servantsandotherswithcitizensandotherpublics,oftenwithunclearresults
(Chenetal2016;JulierandKimbell2016).
Myaimhereistomixinsightsfromthisbookwiththecreativepracticestiedup
withhowpublicpolicies,solutionsandservicesarebeingconstituted,
researched,designed,developedandevaluatedastheyco-emergeinrelationto
socialissuesandpolicyagendas.InwhatfollowsIreviewsomeoftheconcerns
ofparticipantsinthisworldofsocialandgovernmentinnovation.Ithenidentify
opportunitiesforinventivesocialresearchtoreconfiguretheseevents,
narrativesandpractices.FinallyIsuggestsomeissuesthatresultfromusingan
inventiveapproachinrelationtosocialinnovationandtogovernment
experimentation.Assomeonewithstakesinthesemattersasacitizen,user,
researcher,educatorandconsultant,mydiscussionisunapologetically
-
interventionistandactivisti.ItakewhatIunderstandtobethepossibilitiesof
inventivesocialresearchandexplorehowitcanreconfiguredevices,practices
andnarrativesassociatedwith‘innovation’tochangehowthingsaredonein
publicpolicycontexts.Myhopeisthattheacademicdiscussioninthisbook,
whichrecognizesthepotentialforengagementbetweensocialresearchand
creativepracticeandexperimentationinsociallifecanintersectproductively
withthepracticesofsocialandgovernmentinnovationthroughwhichpublic
issuesareformedandaddressed.Howeverthismightpresentsomechallenges
becauseoftheemphasisintheseworldsondemonstratingshort-term
achievementsandeasilytraceablepassagesbetweeninsightandevidenceand
actionandoutcome.
Theword‘innovation’hasgainedwidecurrencyinacontextinwhichneo-
liberalismincreasinglypushespublicservants,politiciansandcitizenstocome
upwithnovelsolutionstosociety’sissues.Socialandgovernmentinnovationare
perhapsbettercharacterizedasinvention(Barry2001),whichforegroundsthe
processualandperformativenatureofhownovelsolutionsareconstitutedand
re-made.Inventionmightbeseenasaphaseorstagewithinaninnovation
process,emphasisingthereconfiguringofconstituentelementsintonovel
arrangements,whichcannotbepre-determined(Garudetal2013).Butmore
thanatemporalphase,theconceptofinventionalsopointstothelogicsthrough
whichnewcombinationsofresourcesareassembledandthroughwhichnew
publicsandissuesarebroughtintobeing.
-
Recentdevelopmentssuggestgrowingvisibilityofactivitiesseenas,orhopedto
resultin,innovationinrelationtopublicadministrations,withclosealignmentto
relatedexperimentationhappeninginbusiness.Argumentsfor‘mission-
oriented’innovationintoday’sgovernments(egMazzucato2013)intersectwith
‘agile’softwaredevelopment(egGovernmentDigitalService2016),‘lean’start
up(egRies2011),‘smart’government(egNoveck2015)andnewpartnerships
betweengovernment,businessandsocialenterprise(EggersandMacmillan
2013).Suchdevelopmentshaveco-emergedalongsiderelatedactivitieswithin
thinktanksandcommunityandvoluntarygroupsaswellasbeinginformedby
academicresearchii.Theyarealsoshapedbyneo-liberaldriverswithinsome
governmentstopromoteausterity,drivecommercialisationofpublicservice
provisionandco-producesolutionswithsocialactors,sometimesshiftingthe
responsibilityforaddressingsociety’sissuesawayfromgovernmentstoothers
(Julier2017).Asaresult,todifferingextents,itispossibletofindbigdata
analysis,digitalplatforms,socialmediaengagementandanalysis,randomised
controltrials,participatorydesignandsocialandbehaviouralresearchused
alongsideoneanothertogenerateandexploresuchsolutionstopolicyissues(in
thecaseofgovernmentinnovation)ortoaddressproblemsthatmayresultfrom
policydecisionsandactions,ortheirlack(inthecaseofsocialinnovation).
Commontobothsocialandgovernmentinnovationarepreoccupationswith,and
narrativesabout,experimentation,politics,participationandsystemschange.
Challengesinsocialandgovernmentinnovation
-
Muchsocialandgovernmentinnovationascurrentlyorganisedistiedupwith
‘challenges’.Sometimesachallengeissimplyexpressedintheformofa
summaryofanissueandaquestionstarting‘howcanwe…?’iiiSuchchallenges
arearticulationsofissueswhichmanagersofpublicservices,policymakers,
funders,businessesandentrepreneursaswellasuniversitiesandthirdsector
groupsorganisethemselvesinrelationto,possiblywiththeinvolvementof
academicsandwithacademicresearch.Familiartopicsincludeaddressing
environmentalchange,tacklingobesityorimprovingprospectsforpeoplefacing
unemployment.Theconstructionandarticulationofsuchchallengestakesa
varietyofformsdependingonone’slocationinrelationtoanissue,withvarying
degreesofagency,accountabilityandlegitimacy.Forexamplefunders,
consultancies,universities,thinktanks,communitygroupsandservice
provsidersmayconstructorbeinvitedtorespondtoachallengeviamechanisms
suchasinvitationstotender,callsforproposals,competitions,sandpits,jams,
anddesignbriefs,withassociatedplatforms,resources,networks,fundingand
meansofassessingtowhatextentachallengecanorhasbeenaddressed.
Funders,policyteams,researchersandmanagersseektomobilisediverse
resourcesinaddressinganissueincludingresearchers,professionals,citizens,
activistsor‘users’–oftenwithuncertainmotivations,accountabilitiesor
rewardsanddifferentlevelsofurgency–alongsidedifferentinstitutional
researchcapacities,organisationalroutines,datasetsandmodesofparticipation.
Indeed,suchistheextentofthechallengethatthereisnowacentrestudying
andgivingguidanceonorganisingoneiv.Accordingly,inwhatfollowsIidentify
someofthecurrentchallengeswithinsocialinnovationandgovernment
innovation,informedbymyresearchandpracticeintheUK.Aspresentedbelow,
-
thesechallengesarealsoapproachesortechniquesusedtoaddresspublicissues.
Buttheyarethemselvesorganisationalissueswithwhichpublicleadersand
managersarepreoccupied,inacontextinwhichtheyarerequiredtoproduce
their‘innovations’.
Thechallengeofunderstandingandsettingissues.Oftendescribedas‘wicked’
(RittelandWebber1972)or‘complex’(egSnowdenandBoone2007),today’s
problemsarticulatedinthecontextofsocialinnovationorpolicyinnovationare
dynamic,multi-actorandmulti-sited.Informedbyperspectivesinsystems
theory,futuresandstrategicmanagement,therehasbeenrecognitionforseveral
decadesthat‘transdisciplinaryapproaches’(Bernstein2015)areneededto
addresssuchissues.Issuessuchasloweducationalattainmentforwhite
workingclassboysintheUKcrosstheboundariesofdisciplines,organisational
capabilities,sitesofpracticeandscalesofgovernment,requiringactorstowork
togethertounderstandthesocialworldtheywanttochange.Suchissuesare
seenasdynamicandinfluxandashavinginterdependencies,contingenciesand
feedbackloopsthatmakethemhardtoidentify,describeoranalyse.Issuesco-
emergewithpublics;non-governmentstakeholderscanplayactiverolesin
enrollingothersintoanissue(Marres2005;Hillgrenetal2016).Butdespite
thesemoves,inmanycasespolicyorsocialproblemshaveendured,despitethe
applicationoveryearsofdifferentkindsofexpertise,analysis,investmentsin
organizationalchange,changesinleadership,technology,andotherresourcesas
wellasfluctuationsincollectivevisionsaboutwhichproblemsmatter.Different
assumptionsplayouthereaboutwhatcountsasevidencethatthereisanissue,
whatkindofissueitisandforwhom.Bigdataandbehaviouralresearchare
-
increasinglyevidentasresourcesanddriversoforganisationalattentioninthe
policyecosystem(Dunleavy2016).Suchevidenceisoftentiedtothecapacities
ofcorporationstoassemble,organiseandanalyselargedatasetsproviding
particularkindsofsocialdata.Butalongsidebigdatatooaremicro-social
perspectivesfromethnographyaswellasparticipatoryapproachestoexploring
issuesthroughworkshops,eventsandonlineplatforms.Thegrowingavailability
ofandinterconnectionsbetweendifferentformsofdataarereconfiguringsocial
andgovernmentinnovationlandscapes.
Thechallengeofgeneratingandexploringsolutions.Inacontextinwhichissues
areseenasdynamic,multi-sitedandmulti-actor,thenadvocatesforsocialand
governmentinnovationoftenargueforanexperimentalapproach(egBreckon
2015).Differentkindsofexperimentalityemergeinresponsetodifferentsocial
orpolicyissuesinvolvingdifferentkindsoforganisationalapparatus.Some
approaches,forexample,healthcareimprovement(egRobertandMacdonald
2016),recognisethevalueoflocalactorswithastakeinanissuebeinginvolved
ingeneratingandco-producingsolutions–whichhandilycoincideswitha
smallerroleforgovernmentinaneo-liberalworld(Julier2017).Digital
platformsareoftenimplicatedintheworkofgoverning.Someresponsesto
socialorpublicpolicyissues,suchastheOpenIDEOdigitalplatformvpublish
openchallengessetbyapolicyteam,foundationorcorporatesponsorand
structureandenableprocessesthataimtoengagepeoplenotpreviously
connectedtoanissuetoexploreitandgenerateanditeratepossiblesolutions.
Alongsidethiskindofexperimentation,othertraditionshavebecomemore
visibleinsidegovernmentandpublicpolicy.Inparticularrandomisedcontrol
-
trialsadaptedfromclinicalsciencesarepromotedbysomefunders,researchers
andcivilservantsaswaystotestideasandprovideevidenceforpolicydecisions
about‘whatworks’,oftentiedtobehaviouraltheory(seePuttick2012;Halpern
2015)vi.Asinscienceandtechnologystudies(STS),forcivilservantsandsocial
entrepreneursapersistentpreoccupationisscale,notasananalyticalconstruct
butasanoperationalachievement:howcansolutionsdevelopedandtestedhere,
berolledoutandeffectivethere?
Thechallengeofunderstandingchange.Currentpracticeinsocialand
governmentinnovationtosomeextentrecognisesthatmultipleactorsare
involvedinconstitutinganissueandthenshapingpotentialresponsestodoing
somethingaboutitinordertoachieveintended‘outcomes’,recognisingthat
unintendedconsequenceswillalsoresult.Tounderstandaproblemorto
generateasolution,amanagerinavoluntarysectororganizationoracivil
servantmaybeaskedtoarticulatea‘theoryofchange’.Theoriesofchangein
playoftenforegroundmicro-socialworldsand‘choices’madebyindividuals
ratherthansocialpractices(e.g.Shoveetal2012)orareinformedby,drawon
anddeployformsoftechnologicaldeterminism(e.g.WilkieandMichael2008).
Somedomainssuchashealthcareimprovementallowanunderstandingof
changethatrecognizesmultiplekindsofsocialworldandresearchers’and
managers’participationwithinitalongsidethebeneficiariesofinterventionsor
usersofservices.Butinothercases,innovationtoolkitsviiandcallsforproposals
publishedbycommissionersofservicesspreadtheideathatsuchtheoriesof
changecanbeadequatelydescribedinapageortwo.Somefunders,forexample,
requireapplicantstodescribetheirtheoryofchangeunderpinningaproject(eg
-
Nesta2016).Elsewhere,methodsdrawingonparticipatorydesigninsocialor
policyinnovationworkshopsaskparticipantstomaterialisemodelsofpotential
solutionsandactoutthroughroleplayhowsolutionsmightchangeasituation
(Kimbell2015).Indescribinghowadesiredchangeinasocialworldmight
unfoldasaresultofaproposedintervention,participantsareaskedto
foreground‘barriers’tochangeandhowtheseneedtobeaddressedin
implementingasolution.Thetemporalandspatialorderingofhowchangeis
constituted,experienced,understood,assessedandevaluatedisdownplayed.
Discussionsofwhohasagencytomakechangeandtheconditionsand
possibilitiesaroundthisareoftenleftunexamined.
Thechallengeofparticipation.Fromdifferentperspectives,socialinnovationand
governmentinnovationarebothpremisedoncurrentandfuturerelations
betweenactorsinvolvedinanissue.Suchpracticesforegroundhumanactors
suchas‘users’,‘citizens’orpossibly‘beneficiaries’,oftenalreadyidentifiedas
involvedinanissueandhavingparticular‘needs’or‘capacities’.Insocial
innovationandgovernmentinnovationpractice,emergingactivitiesinclude
generatinginsightsaboutwhatishappeninginasocialworldfromthe
perspectiveofsuchactors;identifyingandmobilisingemergingpractices;
identifyingnon-obviousactorsinanissue;andengagingactorsingeneratingand
possiblyco-producingsolutions.Inthecaseofcaringforolderpeople,for
example,humanactorsmightincludepeopledirectlyexperiencingthesocialor
policychallenge(e.g.olderpeopleandtheirfamilies,friendsorneighbours),
professionals(e.g.socialworkers,healthvisitors,nurses),serviceproviders(e.g.
carersworkingformunicipalitiesorcommercialfirms),businesses(eg
-
entrepreneursorlocalshopsorutilities),researchers(socialorhealthcare
researchers,butalsodataanalysts),andvoluntaryorcommunitygroups(e.g.
thoseworkingwitholderpeopleorcarers).AperspectivefromSTSwouldalso
emphasisethenon-humanactorsthatco-constituteadultsocialcare,suchas
assistivetechnologies,particularkindsofhousingarrangementandlayout,
conceptssuchas‘ageing’and‘caring’andfinancialmodelsforcareservices.For
peopleself-identifyingassocialorgovernmentinnovators,acknowledgingand
engagingawidearrayofactorsmaybedriveninpartbyopennesstoemergence
aswellasdemocraticideals.Nonethelessexistingandfuturelevelsofagencyand
powerrelationsmaybeunder-examined.Forinnovatorsinsidegovernment,
participationhasacomplicatedrelationshiptoformaldemocraticstructuresand
processes,partypoliticsandthemedia.Forexampleinvitingresponsesviaan
onlineconsultationorthroughparticipationinapolicyworkshopcanprivilege
somecontributionsoverothers(egFortier2010).
Opportunitiesforinventiveapproaches
Thesebriefsummariesofsomeofthechallengesfacingthoseinvolvedinsocial
andgovernmentinnovationhavehighlightedsomeconcernsthatresonatewith
inventivesocialresearch.Whilesomereadersmayobjecttomyemphasison
relativelyshort-term,easily-traceableintervention,Iwanttoexplorewhat
inventivesocialresearchhasto‘offer’servicemanagers,deliverypartners,policy
makers,fundersorcommunitiesentangledwiththesechallenges.Howmight
inventivesocialresearchexpressandconnectsocialphenomenainthesettingsI
describe,resultinginchangesinhowthingsaredone,aswellasinnewinsights?
-
Howdoesitchallengedominantnotionsofinnovationingovernmentand
society?Thethingsthatinventivesocialresearchmightofferorprovoke,
however,arenotnecessarilywhattheseactorswant,value,orhavecapacityto
engagewith,atopictowhichIwillreturnlater.
Challengingthechallenge.Asindicatedinthisbook,acorecharacteristicof
inventivesocialresearchishowitproblematisesanissue.Insteadoftakingupa
challengeasinitiallyarticulatedorframed,inventivesocialresearchstartswitha
queryintoadomain.Itdoesnottakeasgiventheconstituentsofanissue.
Throughsuchresearch,asocialorpolicyinnovationchallengeislikelytobe
reconfigured.Thismayallowidentificationofspecificaspectsthatneed
addressing,oracknowledgementofdifferentactorsfromthoseoriginally
thoughttobepartoftheissue,orashiftinlocation,scaleortimeframe.For
exampleinhischapteronmakinginterventionstotheBarcelonaPavilion,Jacque
revealsthematerialpractices,objectsandmaterialsassociatedwithits
maintenanceandmanagement,bytemporarilyrecomposingtheconstituentsof
thepavilion.Forsocialorpolicyinnovators,inventivesocialsciencedraws
attentiontothepossibilitythatthechallengemotivatingtheirworkiscomposed
differentlythantheyoriginallyunderstood,whichcanberevealedthrough
creativeintervention.Theactorsorpublicsinvolvedinconstitutingthechallenge
mightnotbetheonesinitiallyassumedtobepartofit,andtheircapacitiesmight
alsobeotherthanoriginallyunderstood(StilgoeandGuston2017).
Sensitisingparticipantstothe‘socials’beingenacted.Inventivesocialresearch
doesnottakethe‘social’asagivenbutperformsanemergingunderstandingof
-
particularsocialsthroughexperimentalco-articulation–offeringan‘experiential
togetherness’asSavranskyobservesinhischapter.Byintentionallymodifying
settingsorpromptingactorstoexpressthemselvesorperformdifferently,social
phemomenabecomevisibleinnewways.Inventiveresearchrevealsthe
agenciesanddifferentkindsofsocialwhichmayco-existandinteractwithone
another.Beingabletoidentify,bringintoview,oranalysethesewithinaproject
canenablethoseworkinginsocialinnovationorgovernmentinnovationto
developandcontinuallyrevisetheirunderstandingsofthepolicydomainand
howpotentialsolutionsarereconfigured.Thiscanhelpthemthinkthroughthe
waysinwhichtheproblemmightchangeasexperimentationproceeds–and
drawattentiontohowaproject’sactivitiesareimplicatedinarticulating
particularsocials.
Generatinginfrastructures/practicesthatconstituteanissueorpublic.The
versionsofinventivesocialresearchthatcombinedesignandSTSresemble
somecontemporaryactivitieswithinsocialandgovernmentinnovation.
Expertisewhichbridgesresearchandpracticeisnowbeingdevelopedas
capabilitiesinsidegovernmentteamsandsocialinnovationnetworks.For
example,civilservantsintheUKgovernmentareusingcreativeapproachesthat
combinethedoing,representingandinterveninginpolicydevelopment(eg
Kimbell2015).Bycombiningdifferentkindsofresearch,materialisingmodelsof
potentialpoliciesandorganisingparticipatoryworkshops,multiple
understandingsofthepolicyissueandpotentialinterventionsarebroughtinto
view,changingtheissueandtheinstitutionofgovernment,notjustrepresenting
theissue.Forsocialorpolicyinnovators,adoptinganinventiveapproachwould
-
allowthemtobetterunderstandhowpolicyagendas,devices,workprogrammes
andpublicsareconfiguredrelationally.Itwouldallowsuchpractitionersto
recogniseandreflectontheirrolesindoinginfrastructuringworkbyproviding
resources,designingworkprogrammesandproducingdevicessuchasmodels,
frameworks,guidelinesandcriteria(egLeDantecandDisalvo2014;Hilgrenetal
2016).
Enablingattentivenesstoscaling.Scalingandthedistributionofagencyarelong-
standingconcernswithinSTSandareevidentininventiveapproachestosocial
research.ForexampleNold’smacroandmicroprototypesconnecttheissueof
noiseannoyanceatHeathrowandpublicswithinnewconfigurations.Wilkieand
Michael’schaptershowshowthesituatedperformancesofthenetworked
EnergyBabbledisruptedassumptionsoftheresearchfundersabout‘community’
andpolicyframingsabouttheusageofinformationfromsmartmeters.Inventive
socialresearchinsocialinnovationorgovernmentinnovationcontextscan
highlighthowscaleisperformed,ratherthanpre-existing,assumedorgiven.It
hasthepotentialtogeneratenewpossibilitiesenablingintendedoutcomestobe
identified,assessedandrevisedwhilebeingopentorecognizinghownovel
configurationsandconsequencesunfoldinpractice.
Openinguptheworkofresearching.Inventivesocialresearchdrawsontraditions
whichhighlightthedistributionofagencyacrosshumanandnon-humanactors
andthetranslationsinvolvedproducingknowledgeandachievingtechnological
change.MarresandGerlitz’saccountofacollaborativeanalysisofadatasetfrom
Twittershowedhowcategoriessuchas‘frequency’or‘volume’gotinthewayof
-
detectingthesocialityofTwitter,whichledtotheresearchteamrefocusingtheir
attentionondevelopingothermeanstoaccessdynamicinteractionsbetween
Twitteraccounts.IntheirchapterGuggenheimetalcombineobjects,situations
andpressuretodemonstratethe(creative)workthatgoesoninresearchingan
issue.Bringingtheseorientationsintosocialandgovernmentinnovationdraws
attentiontothematerialpractices,eventsandactorsinvolvedindoingand
representingresearchandinterveningintoanissue.Insteadofanalyzingand
reproducing‘whatworks’–acontemporarypreoccupationwithinsocialor
governmentinnovation,thisapproachcanhighlightwhatisrequiredfora
solutionto‘work’andthepracticalaccomplishmentsofdoingresearchinsocial
andgovernmentsettings.
Inshortthereispotentialforinventiveapproachestoengagedirectlywithsocial
innovationandgovernmentsettings.By‘directly’Imeanacademicresearchers
workingexperimentallyincollaborationwithpeople(whomayhaveresearch
training)inlocalorcentralgovernment,communityandvoluntarygroups,think
tanks,serviceproviders,entrepreneurs,activistsorothersinthepolicy
ecosystemwhoareengagedinunderstandingaproblemdomainandintervening
intoit.Someofthechallengessuchindividualsorteamsfaceindoingtheworkof
socialorgovernmentinnovationpresentopportunitiestoenactnovelkindsof
doing,representingandinterveninginsocialworlds.Whilethismaybedriven
by,andresultin,theprioritisationofshort-term,easilytraceableassociations,on
theotherhandthereisalsopotentialforinventiveresearchtointervenetooin
institutionalpractices,devicesandnarrativesthatdrivethisshort-termism.
-
Implications
Inventivesocialresearchcanproblematiseaccountsofpolicyissuesand
potentialsolutionsdevelopedinrelationtothem.Itcanproposemodesofdoing
researchbyopeninguptheoriesofchange,identifyinghowscaleoperates,
acknowledginghumanandnon-humanconstituentsandagency,andexamining
thegovernanceandstylesofparticipationenactedinaproject.Insodoing,new
possibilitieswillemerge.Byengagingexperimentallyinreconfiguringprojects
thataimtoaddresssocialorpublicpolicyissues,researchersmayhelparticulate
anddetectnewsocials;developnewdevices,infrastructuresandmethods;and
produceunderstandingoftheirgenealogies,possibilitiesandlimits.Theymay
alsobeabletosituatethemselvesmorecloselyinrelationtosomeofthe
challengesthatserviceproviders,policymakersandactivistsareinvolvedinby
co-producing‘change’aswellas‘knowledge’(FacerandEnright2016).
Withthepossibilityofcloserengagementbetweeninventivesocialresearchand
socialandgovernmentinnovationcomeanumberofmattersthatneedfurther
consideration.Thefirstisthedifferenttemporalitiesthatcomeintoplayinthe
worldsofacademicresearch,whichmaynotbealignedwiththosewithinsocial
innovationandpolicyexperimentation.Academiahasitsowntemporal
intensitiesthatemerge,forexample,whenapplyingforfunding,doingresearch,
presentingatworkshopsorconferences,andwritingpapersorbooks,aswellas
movingbetweenjobsorinstitutions.Someofthesetakeplaceoverdaysor
weeks;somemaytakeplaceoverseveralyears.Withinsocialinnovationand
governmentinnovation,timescalesareequallyvariedandintense.Invitationsto
-
tendermayhavedeadlinesofweeksormonths,researchundertakentoshape
policymakingmaytakemonths,whileeffortstoresearch,developandredesign
aservicemighttakemonthsoryears.Incontrastaministermightwantapolicy
recommendationtobeproducedinamatterofdays;acampaigntochange
regulationsorthelawmighttakeyears.Aligningtheperspectivesandresources
ofresearchersinrelationtoorganisationalroutinesandresourcesinsidepublic
administrationsandtheorganisationalecosystemsaroundthemisnotatrivial
matterbutasGuggenheimetalargue,theapplicationofpressuremaybe
productive.
Asecondandrelatedissueistheaccountabilitiesheldbydifferentactors
involvedinaninventivecollaboration.Academicsmightholdthemselves
accountabletocolleagues,currentorfuturestudents,theirinstitutions,funders,
professionalbodiesorpartnersfromcivilsociety,businessorthepublicsector.
Managers,volunteers,activistsorcivilservantshaveotheraccountabilities
whichmightincludetocolleagues,professionalbodies,serviceusersor
residents,fundersanddonors,organisationalpartners,codesofpractice,orto
publicbodiessuchasparliament.Bringingintoviewandarticulatingdistinct
accountabilitiesatdifferentlevelsofinstitutionalisationandformality,
recognizingthattheseaccountabilitiesmaycontinuetochange,requires
attentionandreflexivity.
Athirdissueisthejostlingforpowerandnegotiationsbetweendifferentkindsof
expertiserequiredtodoinventivesocialresearch,whichalsoemergesinother
kindsofappliedacademicresearch.IntheirchapterGuggenheimetalpropose
-
thatexperts‘accompany’alaypersonalonganexperimentalpath.Doing
inventivesocialresearchinthecontextofsocialorgovernmentinnovation
requiresawarenessofdifferentkindsandsitesofexpertiseandthe
infrastructures,practicesanddevicesthatenablethis.Indifferentways,the
contributorstothisbookrevealsomeoftheskillsandknowledgerequiredto
undertakeinventivesocio-materialandaestheticexperiments.Asthe
connectionsbetweensocialandgovernmentinnovatorsandcreativepractices
continueintensify,newpatternsofexpertisewillemergewithininventive
research.Moreintersectionsbetweenthekindsofacademicresearchdiscussed
inthisvolumeandthepracticesIhavedescribedwillleadtothedevelopmentof
newtools,bureaucraticrelationshipsandsystemsofvalorisationand
governance.
Eachoftheseissuesshapesthematerialpractices,devices,infrastructuresand
processesofdoinginventiveresearchinthecontextsofsocialandgovernment
innovation.Bybeingattentivetotemporalities,accountabilitiesandexpertiseas
constitutiveofinventiveresearch,suchexperimentalcollaborationswillplayout
differently.
Toconclude,thissketchhassuggestedhowinventivesocialresearchmight
engagewithcurrentpreoccupationsandpracticesinsocialinnovationand
governmentinnovation.Sharedconcernsincludeexperimentation,systems,
participationandthereorderingandreconfiguringofasocialworldandthe
politicsofsodoing.Bydrawingattentiontotheprocessualreconfiguringof
resourcesandrelationsthroughachangeprocess,inventiveresearchersand
-
theircollaboratorsinsocialinnovationandgovernmentsettingsmayadd
nuance,criticalappreciationofandinsighttotheclaimsmadeforandabout
innovation.MyhopeisthatmydescriptionofthechallengesIseeinsocialand
governmentinnovationandbriefoutlineofhowthiscouldunfoldwillsparknew
engagements.Attheveryleast,thisaccountmaypromptinterestamong
researchersinsomeofthesesettingsinmoreinventivedoing,representingand
intervening.
References
Bernstein,J.H.,‘Transdisciplinarity:Areviewofitsorigins,development,and
currentissues’,JournalofResearchPractice,11(1),2015,ArticleR1.Retrieved
fromhttp://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/510/412Accessed2July,
2017).
Breckon,J.,BetterPublicServicesThroughExperimentalGovernment,(London:
AllianceforUsefulEvidence,2015).
Chen,D.-S.,Cheng,L.-L.,Hummels,C.,andKoskinen,I.,‘Socialdesign:An
introduction’,InternationalJournalofDesign,2016,10(1),1-5.
Dunleavy,P.‘”Bigdata”andpolicylearning’,inGerryStokerandMarkEvans,
eds,MethodsthatMatter:SocialScienceandEvidence-BasedPolicymaking,
(Bristol:ThePolicyPress,2016).
-
Eggers,W.andMacmillan,P.,TheSolutionRevolution:HowBusiness,Government,
andSocialEnterprisesAreTeamingUptoSolveSociety'sToughestProblems,
(Boston:HarvardBusinessSchoolPublishing,2013).
Facer,K.andEnright,B.,CreatingLivingKnowledge.TheConnectedCommunities
Programme,CommunityUniversityRelationshipsandtheParticipatoryTurninthe
ProductionofKnowledge,(Bristol:UniversityofBristol/AHRCConnected
Communities,2016).
Fortier,A-M.‘Proximitybydesign?AffectiveCitizenshipandtheManagementof
Unease’,CitizenshipStudies,2010,14(1):17-30.
Garud,R.,Tuertscher,P.andVandeVen,A.‘PerspectivesonInnovation
Processes’,TheAcademyofManagementAnnals,2013,7(1):775-819.
GovernmentDigitalService,‘Agiledelivery’,2016,
[accessed4December
2016].
Halpern,D.,InsidetheNudgeUnit:HowSmallChangesCanMakeaBigDifference,
(London:Penguin,2016).
Hillgren,P.A.,Seravalli,A.andErikson,M.,‘Counter-hegemonicPractices;
DynamicInterplayBetweenAgonism,CommoningandStrategicDesign’,
StrategicDesignResearchJournal,2016,9(2):89-99.
Julier,G.,EconomiesofDesign.(London:Sage,2017).
Julier,G.andKimbell,L.,Co-producingSocialFuturesThroughDesignResearch,
(Brighton:UniversityofBrighton,2016).
Kimbell,L.,ApplyingDesignApproachestoPolicyMaking:DiscoveringPolicyLab,
(Brighton:UniversityofBrighton,2015).
-
LeDantec,C.A.andC.DiSalvo,‘Infrastructuringandtheformationofpublics’,
SocialStudiesofScience,2013,43(2):241–264.
Mazzucato,M.,TheEntrepreneurialState–DebunkingPublicvs.PrivateSector
Myths,(London:AnthemPress,2013).
Mulgan,G.,Tucker,S.Ali,R.andSanders,B.,SocialInnovation:WhatItIs,WhyIt
MattersandHowItCanBeAccelerated.(Oxford:SkollCentreforSocial
Entrepreneurship,2006).
Nesta/TheSocialInnovationPartnership.‘GuidanceforDevelopingaTheoryof
ChangeforYourProgramme’,2016,
[accessed2November2016].
Nicholls,A.andMurdock,A.,eds,SocialInnovation:BlurringBoundariesto
ReconfigureMarkets,(Basingstoke:PalgraveMacMillan,2011).
Noveck,B.,SmartCitizens,SmarterState:ThetechnologiesofExpertiseandthe
FutureofGoverning,(Cambridge:HarvardUniversityPress,2015).
OECD.(2016).ObservatoryofPublicSectorInnovation.
[accessed2
September2016].
Puttick,R.WhyWeNeedtoCreateaNICEforSocialPolicy,(London:Nesta,2012).
Puttick,R.,Baeck,P.andColligan,P.,I-teams.TheTeamsandFundsMaking
InnovationHappeninGovernmentsAroundtheWorld.(London:
Nesta/BloombergPhilanthropies,2014).
Ries,E.TheLeanStartUp.HowRelentlessChangeCreatesRadicallySuccessful
Businesses.(NewYork:CrownBusiness,2011).
-
Rittel,H.W.J.andWebber,M.M.,‘DilemmasinaGeneralTheoryofPlanning’,
PolicySciences,1973,4:155-169.
Robert,G.andA.Macdonald.‘Co-design,OrganisationalCreativityandQuality
ImprovementintheHealthcareSector:“Designerly”or“Design-like”?’inD.
SangiorgiandA.Prendiville,eds,,DesigningforService:KeyIssuesandDirections,
117-129(London:Bloomsbury,2017).
Shove,E.,Pantzar,M.andWatson,M.TheDynamicsofSocialPractice
EverydayLifeandHowitChanges.(London:Sage,2012).
Snowden,D.,andM.Boone,‘ALeader’sFrameworkforDecisionMaking’,
HarvardBusinessReview,(November,2007)
Stilgoe,J.andGuston,D.,‘Responsibleresearchandinnovation’,inFelt,U.,
Fouché,R.,Miller,C.andSmith-Doerr,L.,eds,4thedition,HandbookofScience
andTechnologyStudies,2017,853-880
Williamson,B.‘Thedigitalmethodsandimaginationofinnovationlabs’,,2015,
,[accessed21September2015]
YoungFoundation,History,2017,[accessed11June2017].
iIhavebeeninvolvedindifferentwayswithinthesedevelopmentsforoveradecade:asaneducatorteachingdesignthinkingtoMBAstudentsandsocialentrepreneurs;asformerheadofsocialdesignatTheYoungFoundation;asaresearcherstudyingsocialdesignfortheArtsandHumanitiesResearchCouncil(AHRC);asaresearcherembeddedforayearinPolicyLab,ateamintheCabinetOfficeoftheUKgovernmentviaanAHRCfellowship;asaconsultanthelpinggovernmentbodiesdevelopdesigncapabilities;asauserofpublicservices;andasanactivistwhereIlive.iiThereisalongtraditionofthinktanksintheUKandotherpolicyecosystemswhichcarryoutresearchandundertakeexperimentsinrelationtosocialissuesthataresometimestranslatedintopublicpolicy.AnearlyexamplewastheInstituteofCommunityStudiessetupbyMichaelYoungin1952.Throughhis
-
writing,workontheLabourPartymanifestoin1945,involvementinthecreationofinstitutionssuchastheOpenUniversity,Younghaslongbeenrecognizedanearlysocialinnovatorwhoseexpertisebridgedsocialresearch,publicpolicyandorganistionalaction(YoungFoundation2017).iiiAnexerciseinwhichparticipantsnotedownandthensharechallengesintheform‘howcanwe…?”iscommonintheworkofPolicyLab,ateamintheUKgovernment’sCabinetOffice.Seehttps://www.slideshare.net/Openpolicymaking/policy-lab-slide-share-introduction-final[accessed11June2016].ivTheUK’sinnovationagencyNestasetupaChallengePrizeCentrein2012tostudyandpromote‘challenge-based’innovation,[accessed11June2016].vInternationaldesignconsultancyIDEO’splatformpartnerswithfoundations,corporatesponsorsandgovernmentbodiestosetchallengesforitsuserstorespondto,,[accessed11June2016].viAleadingexamplehereistheUK-basedinternationalBehaviouralInsightsTeamoriginallysetupintheUKgovernment’sCabinetOffice,whichitnowco-ownswiththeUKinnovationcharityNestaandtheseniormanagementteam.SeetheaccountofitschiefexecutiveDavidHalpern(2015).Suchapproachesarenotwithoutcriticism.viiSeeforexampletheDevelopmentImpactandYouToolkitaimedatpeopleworkingindevelopmentcontexts,producedbyUKinnovationagencyNestaandfundedbytheRockefellerFoundation,,[accessed11June2016].