how do we measure the benefits of green infrastructure?
DESCRIPTION
How do we comprehensively measure all of the benefits of green infrastructure? How can we not only put these green options on par with traditional gray infrastructure in terms of reliability and safety; but also show other significant benefits such as increased quality of life, improved public health, reduced energy requirements, resiliency to climate change, and enhanced natural environment? This Sidebar Conversation will discuss how a systems approach can be used in order to show the interconnections and interrelationships of our water resources, as well as measure the benefits of green infrastructure. This approach can facilitate new partnerships between utilities, park departments, schools, transportation agencies, redevelopment agencies and private interests. It can also leverage scarce resources (time and money) to implement projects with greater public support.TRANSCRIPT
Measuring the Benefits of Green InfrastructureUsing a Systems Approach
Parkway Infiltration Swale11th St & Hope St – Los Angeles
October 16, 2012
Adel Hagekhalil, P.E., BCEEWing Tam, P.E.
Dan Rodrigo
Purpose of Side Bar&
Introduction to Green Infrastructure Benefits
As urban communities consider green infrastructure as an option to meeting regulatory requirements and environmental goals, it is important to fully measure all of the potential benefits using triple-bottom-line.Urban communities are systems of many systems (water, energy, transportation, environment), which are all interconnected. Using a systems approach, all of the benefits of green infrastructure can be measured more accurately,which will help foster greater partnerships and increase funding opportunities!
Purpose of Side Bar
Institutional MeasuresPublic OutreachPublic Education
Municipal OrdinancesGreen Building OrdinanceLow Impact Development (LID) Ordinance
Local (on-site) ProjectsRain BarrelsBioswales
Regional ProjectsWetland ParksGreen StreetsRegional GW Recharge
Integrated
Water Resources Approach
Institutional
Measures
Local (on-site)
Measures
Regional Measures
Ordinances
Multi-Faceted Approach is Key!
Green Infrastructure Takes Many Forms
Green Infrastructure Has Multiple BenefitsExamples Benefits
Improved water qualityLocal water supplyLocal flood controlEnergy reductionGHG reductionIncreased open spaceIncreased recreationIncreased/improved habitatsDeferment of grey infrastructureGreen jobsPublic education
Bioswales
Cisterns/Rain Barrels
Green Roofs
Constructed Wetlands
Green Streets
Regional GW recharge
Green Infrastructure Has Multiple BenefitsExamples Benefits
Improved water qualityLocal water supplyLocal flood controlEnergy reductionGHG reductionIncreased open spaceIncreased recreationIncreased/improved habitatsDeferment of grey infrastructureGreen jobsPublic education
Bioswales
Cisterns/Rain Barrels
Green Roofs
Constructed Wetlands
Green Streets
Regional GW recharge
Green Infrastructure Has Multiple BenefitsExamples Benefits
Improved water qualityLocal water supplyLocal flood controlEnergy reductionGHG reductionIncreased open spaceIncreased recreationIncreased/improved habitatsDeferment of grey infrastructureGreen jobsPublic education
Bioswales
Cisterns/Rain Barrels
Green Roofs
Constructed Wetlands
Green Streets
Regional GW recharge
Green Infrastructure Has Multiple BenefitsExamples Benefits
Improved water qualityLocal water supplyLocal flood controlEnergy reductionGHG reductionIncreased open spaceIncreased recreationIncreased/improved habitatsDeferment of grey infrastructureGreen jobsPublic education
Bioswales
Cisterns/Rain Barrels
Green Roofs
Constructed Wetlands
Green Streets
Regional GW recharge
Systems Approach to Measuring Green Infrastructure
What is Systems Thinking?Systems thinking is the process of understanding how things influence one another within a whole.
Systems thinking illustrates that events are separated spatially and temporally; and can demonstrate that an improvement in one area of a system can impact another area.
Systems thinking promotes communication and understanding at all levels so that silo approaches to solving problems are avoided.
Systems thinking may be used to study any kind of system — natural, engineered, human, conceptual, or combinations of systems.
Simple System for Water
Demands• Indoor Potable• Indoor Non-potable• Cooling• Irrigation
Discharge
Rain Capture
Treatment
TreatmentPumping Storage
Pumping Storage
Storage
Rooftop Runoff
Municipal WTP
Municipal WWTP
Pumping
Municipal Supply
Greywater
Recycled Water
Rainwater
Losses ConsumptionGroundwater
Rainwater
infiltration
Why Do We Need an Urban Systems Model?Complexity of Urban SustainabilityReduce Energy
Footprint
Reduce Water Footprint
Zero Waste
Carbon Neutral City
Overall: Achieve Urban Sustainability
Gre
enho
use
Gas
es
Fina
ncia
l Ana
lysi
s
Reso
urce
Util
izatio
nAnaly
tical
Laye
rs
CDM Smith’s Urban Systems Model
Water
Energy
Ecosystems
Buildings
Transportation
Solid Waste
Syst
em M
ap
Activities
UrbanSectorsSimulation Model
Urban Form
Infrastructure/Facilities
Green Technology
Model Components and Relationships
Model Components and Relationships
Model Simulates:• Rainfall rates, infiltration and hydrology• Water and wastewater demands, flows through treatment and
distribution and system storage• Stormwater system flows• Transportation demands• Solid waste production• Energy demand and energy sources• Receiving water quality• Impacts to ecosystem habitats
Model Components and Relationships
Model Tracks Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)• Total lifecycle costs of alternatives such as gray and green
infrastructure• TMDLs and other water quality metrics• Water shortages/surpluses• Greenhouse gas emissions• Resiliency to extreme climate events• Groundwater storage• Solid waste production and reuse• Renewable energy production• Heat island effects
Library of Building Types
Buildings Sector: ‘Building Types’ and ‘Building Groupings’
Building Types:Building types are pre-
defined as appropriate to local project. Each will
include parameters relevant to resource calculations and
energy modeling.
Occupancy Area per person
Building usage Gender ratio
Daily patterns
Resources (unit) Energy demand Water demand
Waste generated
Location Information Elevation
N-S, E-W location Orientation
Energy zone
Building Geometry Shape Footprint, roof area(s) Number stories Height
Envelope Construction Material Glazing Insulation
Roof Construction MaterialColor/Reflectivity Insulation
Building Groupings:Building groupings will be specified spatially and then described by their percent composition of local, ‘generic’ building types.
Urban FormTotal AreaLocationElevation
CompositionPercent makeup, each building type
Infrastructure
Water Sector
Legend
Centralized
Decentralized
MunicipalWater Treatment
Plant
MunicipalWater Recycling
Plant
All Sectors Included
• Stormwater
• Energy
• Solid Waste
• Transportation
• Ecosystem
Water Sector Technologies
• Rain Harvesting
• Green Roofs
• Rain Gardens
• Bioswales and Bio-Retention
• Graywater
• Recycled Water
• Conservation
• Desalination
• Groundwater
Features of the Urban Systems Model
Water Sector
GHG
Onsite WaterReuse
Irrigation Reuse
Indoor BuildingReuse (graywater)
Used Water
Rain
Rooftop Rain Capture& Storage
System Supplies - Potable - New Water
Onsite Stormwater Management
GHG Layer
• Detailed GHG Accounting• Custom User-Input and Setup• Flexible Pivot-Chart Output• Linked to GIS Mapping
Other Sectors/Layers• All Sectors Report Emissions• Include Cost of Carbon
Contents of Urban Systems Model
Greenhouse Gas Layer
Vehicles
Process(landfill, incineration)
Power Plant Emissions
Energy Use
Refrigerants
Atmosphere Emissions
C02 Sequestered
Energy Use
Energy Use
Energy Use
Wastewater Emissions
Water
Ecosystems
Energy
Buildings
Transportation
Solid Waste
Qua
lity
of
Life
Energy ProducedRoof Area for Rain Capture
Ene
rgy
Dem
and
Waste Generated
Water Demand, Wastewater Generated
Urb
an H
eat I
slan
dT
empe
ratu
re
Shading
Urban Heat IslandIndex
Quality of Life
Eco Index
Wat
er A
ttenu
atio
n
Air Emissions
Tot
al E
nerg
y U
se
Em
issi
ons
GH
G
Red
uced
Dem
and
Rel
iabi
lity
Grid
Req
uire
men
t
Ren
ewab
le E
nerg
y
Pea
k P
ower
Sha
ved
Water Demand(cooling)
Air EmissionsGHG
Eco Intrusion Index
Fuel Demand
Veh
icle
Mile
s, H
ours
Tra
vele
d
Qua
lity
of L
ife
Pro
xim
ity M
etric
s
Impervious Surface, Runoff
Electric VehicleDemand
Air Emissions
Mat
eria
l Fat
e
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Dem
and
Energy Generated(Waste to Energy)
Energy Demand
Water Demand, Wastewater Generation
Wat
er A
vaila
ble
Rel
iabi
lity
Dem
and
Red
uctio
n
Ons
ite C
aptu
rean
d R
euse
Flo
od M
itiga
tion
Energy Demand(process)
Pol
lutio
n
Bicycle
Auto
Bus
Light Rail
Transport Modes
TransportationDemand
Origin/Destination
Population
Trips
Built Areas
Natural Area
Surface Water Area
Open Area
Infrastructure
Area Summary
Inp
uts
- R
ain
Ser
ies
- E
T S
erie
s-
Dem
and
Fac
tors
Inp
uts
- S
olar
Ser
ies
- W
ind
Ser
ies
- D
eman
d F
acto
rs-
Grid
Typ
e
Inp
uts
- M
odes
- N
etw
ork
Des
crip
tion
- V
ehic
le ty
pes
- T
rips/
dest
inat
ions
Inp
uts
- R
outin
g op
tions
Inp
uts
- B
uild
ing
desi
gn-
Site
layo
ut-
Urb
an d
esig
n-
Pop
ulat
ion
- B
uild
ing
usag
e-
Per
cap
ita d
eman
ds
Inp
uts
- C
limat
e-
Top
ogra
phy
- W
ater
shed
and
b
io c
hara
cter
istic
s
Water Sector
Energy Demand
Demands• Indoor Potable• Indoor Nonpotable• Cooling• Irrigation
Discharge
Rain Capture
Treatment
TreatmentPumping Storage
Pumping Storage
StorageRooftop Runoff
Municipal WTP
Municipal WWTP
Pumping
Municipal Supply
Greywater
Recycled Water
Rainwater
Losses Consumption Electric Power Demands
Solar EvaporativeCooling
Ground SourceHeat Pump
RainwaterCooling Exchange
Surface WaterCooling Exchange
SolarHeat Exchange
SewerHeat Exchange
Waste-to Energy
Building Solar PV
Building Hydro Power
Fuel Cells
Grid Power
Site Wind
Site/City Solar PV
Biogas (WW)
Electricity
OtherSector
Demands
AirCooling
Lighting
WaterHeating Water
PumpsPlug
Loads
Co-G
ener
ation
FuelDemand
WaterSector
Energy Sector
Solid WasteGeneration
Height
AmbientTemperature
BuildingOrientation
Angle ofSunlight
Area
TreeShading
Landfill
Process Process Process
Waste-to-EnergyRecycleCompost
WaterSector
EnergySector
WasteGeneration
Biogas Energy
Greenhouse Gas Layer
Applying the Urban Systems Model
Envision and draw urban plans to ‘feed’ into model
Urban Plan “Maps”
Out
put M
etric
Decision Variable
Alternative C
Alternative A
Alternative B
Target
Output, Analytics, and Decisions
Dynamic, integrated simulation in Urban Systems Model
Model Input Application
GIS Application
Systems Dynamics Simulator
Output Tools
Urban Planners, Facility Designers, and Architects
Staff from Public Agencies / Developers
Community Interests and Individuals
Public Agency / Utility Managers
Iterative Input and Feedback in Design and Planning Process
Output from EPA Total Water Management Study (Using Los Angeles as Case Study)
Performance MeasureBaseline
(Status Quo)Integrated
Alt 1Integrated
Alt 2
Water Demand in 2030 (acre-feet/year) 680 585 635
Maximum Supply Deficit During a Drought (mgd)
70 0 11
Average Use of Imported Water (mgd) 121 29 56
Additional Groundwater Storage in 2030 (million gallons)
0 147 174
Zinc Loading at Downstream End of Los Angeles River (kg/year)
26,569 23,788 22,089
Cumulative CO2 Emissions (million metric tons)
26.1 22.6 24.2
Average Monthly Wastewater Flows into Hyperion Plant (mgd)
375 270 335
Present Value Cost ($ billions) $6.7 $5.7 $6.4
Measurement of Green Infrastructure Leads to Partnerships
and Expanded Funding
25 25
Before AfterConstruction
Community Partnership
Elmer Avenue Green Street
Multiple Sources of Funding:• U.S. Bureau of Reclamation $0.33 M• State Water Resources $0.86 M• City LA Sanitation $0.08 M• City LA Stormwater $0.30 M• Local Water Agencies $0.81 M
(LA Water & Power, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Water Replenishment District of Southern California, City of Santa Monica)
• LA Street Services Doing Construction
Many Project Supporters:• Council for Water Health (NGO)• Tree People (NGO)• Urban Semillas (NGO)• Local Neighborhood Council• Area Residents & Businesses
Leveraging Funding Resources
Elmer Avenue Green Street
27 27
Community Opening
After
During Construction
Garvanza Rainwater Park
Multiple Sources of Funding:• State Water Resources $1.00 M• City LA Sanitation (SEP) $2.55 M• City LA Stormwater $0.10 M• LA Water & Power $0.24 M
Many Project Supporters:• USEPA• Los Angeles Regional Water Quality
Control Board• North East Trees (NGO)• Local Neighborhood Schools• Local Neighborhood Council• Area Residents & Businesses
Leveraging Funding Resources
Garvanza Rainwater Park
29
Before After
Community Opening
South Los Angeles Wetlands Park
Means Multiple Sources of Funding:• U.S. EPA Brownfield$ 0.20 M• State Water Resources $ 6.60 M• Metropolitan Transportation Agency $ 0.97 M• City LA Sanitation (SEP) $ 3.74 M• City LA Clean Water Bond $13.36 M• City LA Park Bond $ 1.50 M
And Many Project Supporters:• USEPA• Los Angeles Regional Water Quality
Control Board • Local Neighborhood Schools• Local Neighborhood Council• Area Residents & Businesses
Leveraging Funding Resources
South Los Angeles Wetlands Park
ConclusionsGreen infrastructure has multiple benefitsIt is part of an integrated water resources solution and urban sustainabilityA systems approach can help measure the benefits more accuratelyThis leads to increased partnerships and expanded funding
For more information, contact:Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation:
Adel Hagekhalil, Assistant [email protected]
Wing Tam, Assistant Division ManagerWatershed [email protected]
CDM Smith:Dan Rodrigo, Vice PresidentWater Resources Practice [email protected]