how to change the template color theme multiple sclerosis ... · how to add text the template comes...

1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com Cognitive impairment affects 40-70% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) 1. These impairments are seen in multiple domains of cognition including attention, memory, and speed of information processing 2 . In a previous study using resting-state fMRI, we found abnormal connectivity links for most patients with MS in the default mode network as well as other cognitive networks including attention, memory, language, and visual-spatial memory. BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES CONCLUSIONS Analysis of White Matter Tracts of Resting State Cognitive Networks in Multiple Sclerosis METHODS RESULTS Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; 2 Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, MI Rahil Dharia, BS 1,2 ; Esmaeil Davoodi-Bojd, PhD 1 ; Quan Jing, PhD 1 ; Lian Li, PhD 1 ; Mirela Cerghet, MD,PhD 1 To analyze the white matter damage and topological organization of white matter tracts in specific brain regions responsible for cognition in MS patients compared with healthy controls. Funding Provided by Henry Ford Hospital and Foundation of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers REFERENCES VERBAL MEMORY ATTENTION DEFAULT MODE NETWORK MRI measurements of DTI, T1, T2, and T2 FLAIR were acquired by GE clinical 3T system of 32 healthy subjects and 20 MS patients. DTI images were preprocessed in MATLAB to calculate the fractional anisotropy (FA) maps 3,4,5,6 . We investigated five circuits in the brain responsible for cognitive functions: Default Mode Network (DMN) : (1) Medial Prefrontal Cortex (MPFC), (2) Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex (RACC), (3) Posterior Cingulate Cortex (PCC), (4) Precuneus (PC), and (5) Lateral Parietal Cortex (LPC) •Attention: (1) Thalamus (Superior Colliculus and Pulvinar) (THAL), (2) Superior Parietal Lobule (SPL), (3) Middle Frontal Gyrus (MFG), (4) Superior Frontal Gyrus (SFG), (5) Angular Gyrus (AG), and (6) Supramarginal Gyrus (SMG) •Verbal memory: (1) Inferior Temporal Gyrus (ITG), (2) Medial Occipitotemporal Gyrus (MOG), (3) Middle Temporal Gyrus (MTG), (4) Temporal Pole (TP), (5) Angular Gyrus (AG), and (6) Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG) •Memory: (1) Angular Gyrus (AG), (2) Fusiform Gyrus (FG), (3) Superior Parietal Lobule (SPL), (4) Supramarginal Gyrus (SMG), (5) Hippocampal Formation (HF), and (6) Superior Frontal Gyrus (SFG) •Visual-Spatial Working Memory: (1) Cingulate Region (CR), (2) Superior Frontal Gyrus (SFG), (3) Fornix, (4) Superior Parietal Lobule (SPL), and (5) Supramarginal Gyrus (SMG) VISUO-SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY MEMORY Sociodemographic , clinical, and radiological characteristics of subjects used for DTI and fMRI connectivity analysis RRMS CONTROLS Gender Female 15 16 Male 5 22 Race White 14 Black 6 Others 0 Age (median/range) 39.6 (26-54) 34.92 (17-64) Median disease duration (range) 7 (5-20) EDSS (mean/range) 3 (1-8) Cognitive complains 6 Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of subjects Side Anterior Limb of Internal Capsule Frontal Lobe WM Globus Palladus Hippocam pal FormaKon Lateral Occipito- temporal Gyrus Occipital Lobe WM Parietal Lobe WM Tempor al Lobe WM Uncus Corpus Callosum Right 60% 60% 55% 65% 50% 50% 65% 60% 85% 70% LeO 60% 60% 60% 55% 0 30% 60% 60% 55% The percentile of the MS patients (N=20) having significant FA reduction (p<0.05) of 50% VARIABLE MS subjects N=7 Healthy Controls N=18 p-value Mean age at scan years (range) 35.7 (28-54) 36.4 (17-62) Mean (range) disease duraKon, years 4.8 (2-10) Median (range) EDSS score 2.25 (1-7.5) Use of disease-modifying therapies (Y/N) 7/0 Complains of cogniKve deficit 4 Mean (SD) structural MRI metrics Brain Volume (cm 3 ) 1051.00 (154.17 1196.84 (99.84 0.005 Thalamic Volume (cm 3 ) 13.52 (1.01) 16.32 (1.59) 0.0006 White ma]er Volume (cm 3 ) 427.90 (94.26) 500.76 (40.92) 0.008 Grey ma]er Volume 623.10 (67.96) 696.09 (66.21) 0.01 1. MS pa/ent have significant white ma‘er damage and reduc/on in various regions in the brain involved in cogni/ve networks. Brain volume, normalized thalamic volume, white ma‘er volume, and grey ma‘er volume were significantly lower in MS subjects similar with previous reports 7,8 . 2. For MS pa/ents with mul/ple scans over /me, further progression of white ma‘er damage was found. 3. We report that both anatomical and func/onal connec/vity inside default mode network and cogni/ve networks showed significant differences compared with healthy subjects. Similar with previous reports we found dysfunc/on in fMRI connec/vity in DMN 9,10 . 4. Analyses of both func/onal and structural connec/vity of the five cogni/ve networks (DMN, a‘en/on, verbal memory, memory, visuo- spa/al memory) showed a significant decrease in structural connec/vity bilaterally in MS subjects along with a decrease in func/onal connec/vity of the superior marginal gyrus, angular gyrus, fusiform gyrus, temporal pole, hippocampal forma/on, and thalamus. The decrease in func/onal connec/vity most likely relates to white ma‘er damage in MS. Some regions in the studied networks had heightened connec/vity which may represent compensatory connec/ons as postulated in the literature 11 . 1. Amato MP, Ponziani G, Siracusa G, Sorbi S. Cogni/ve dysfunc/on in early-onset mul/ple sclerosis: a reappraisal afer 10 years Archives of Neurology 2001;58 910):1602-6. 2. Huijbregts SC, Kalkres NF, de Sommerville LM, de Crest V, Polman GH. Cogni/ve impairment and decline in different MS subtypes. J Neurol Sci 2006;245 (1-2): 187-94 3. O. Sporns, "The human connectome: a complex network," Ann N Y Acad Sci, vol. 1224, pp. 109-25, Apr 2011. 4. B. Fischl, D. H. Salat, E. Busa, M. Albert, M. Dieterich, C. Haselgrove, et al., "Whole brain segmenta/on: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain," Neuron, vol. 33, pp. 341-55, Jan 31 2002. 5. J. D. Tournier, F. Calamante, and A. Connelly, "MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions," Interna/onal Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 22, pp. 53-66, 2012. 6.S. M. Smith, M. Jenkinson, M. W. Woolrich, C. F. Beckmann, T. E. Behrens, H. Johansen-Berg, et al., "Advances in func/onal and structural MR image analysis and implementa/on as FSL," Neuroimage, vol. 23, pp. S208-S219, 2004 7. Houtchens MK, Benedict RH, Killiany R, Sharma J, Jaisani Z, Singh B, Weinstock-Gu‘man B, Gu‘man CR, Bakshi R. Thalamic atrophy and cogni/on in mul/ple sclerosis. Neurology 2007; 69:1213-23. 8. Schoonheim MM, Hulst HE, Brandt RB, Strik M, Wink AM, Uitdehaag BMJ, Barkhof F, Geurts JJG. Thalamus structure and func/on determine severity of cogni/ve impairment in mul/ple sclerosis. Neurology 2015;84:776-83. 9 Rocca MA, Valsasina P, Absinta M, Riccitelli G, .Rodegher ME, Misci P, Rossi P, Falini A, Comi G, Filippi M. default-mode network dysfunc/on and cogni/ve impairment in progressive MS. Neurology 2010; 74:1252-59 10. Jones DT, Mateen FJ, Lucchinen CF, Jack CR, Welker KM. Default Mode network disrup/on secondary to a lesion in the anterior thalamus/ Arch Neurol 2011; 68: 242-246. 11. Akbar N, Giorgio A, Till C, Sled JG, Doesburg SM, DeStefano N, Banwell B. Altera/ons of func/onal and structural connec/vity in pediatric-onset mul/ple sclerosis. PloS One 2016;11:1-14. Bilateral decreased DTI connec/vity in MS subjects compared to controls. Asymmetric decreased fMRI connec/vity involving lef cingulate and parietal cortex. Higher func/onal connec/vity was observed in bilateral posterior cingulate cortex and lef precuneus. DTI DTI fMRI fMRI Bilateral decreased DTI connec/vity in MS subjects compared to controls. Asymmetric decreased fMRI connec/vity involving bilateral thalamus and lef frontal and parietal lobes. DTI DTI fMRI fMRI Bilateral decreased DTI connec/vity in MS subjects compared to controls. Decreased fMRI connec/vity involving bilateral hippocampus. Bilateral decreased DTI connec/vity in MS subjects compared to controls. Decreased fMRI connec/vity involving bilateral fusiform gyrus, lef angular gyrus, and temporal pole. Bilateral decreased DTI connec/vity in MS subjects compared to controls. Mixed pa‘ern of decreased and increased fMRI connec/vity bilaterally. DTI DTI fMRI fMRI DTI DTI fMRI fMRI fMRI fMRI DTI DTI 0.0011 0.2154 0.2202 0.2202 0.2202 0.0002 0.0003 0.2202 0.2202 0.2202 0.3000 0.0885 0.2395 0.0000 0.2638 0.0000 0.1245 0.0005 0.1056 0.0004 0.2006 0.0017 0.1588 0.1045 0.3000 0.1262 0.1401 0.1326 0.1484 0.1574 0.0410 0.0256 0.3000 0.3000 0.0012 0.2589 0.0384 0.2468 0.3000 0.0034 0.3000 0.0037 0.0002 0.3000 0.1688 0.2973 0.1164 0.1732 0.0382 0.3000 0.0187 0.2455 0.1498 0.0155 0.0255 0.3000 0.0145 0.2067 0.0061 0.0271 0.0042 0.0051 0.0755 0.3000 0.2514 0.0546 0.2710 0.0006 0.0005 0.0844 0.0005 0.3000 0.0001 L ITG L MOG L MTG L TP L AG L IFG R ITG R MOG R MTG R TP R AG R ITG L ITG L MOG L MTG L TP L AG L IFG R ITG R MOG R MTG R TP R AG R IFG P-Value Increased Connectivity in MS Decreased Connectivity in MS 0.0000 0.2202 0.1123 0.1424 0.2202 0.1155 0.1832 0.0000 0.2202 0.1800 0.2202 0.2202 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.2202 0.3000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0003 0.0000 0.2202 0.2202 0.0006 0.0782 0.1208 0.0022 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.2852 0.0411 0.0638 0.0000 0.0007 0.3000 0.2382 0.3000 0.1655 0.0992 0.0000 0.0019 0.0013 0.0197 0.0027 0.1123 0.0003 0.0034 0.0281 0.0037 0.0385 0.0024 0.0027 0.0001 0.0001 0.0050 0.1479 0.3000 0.3000 0.0020 0.0145 0.0001 0.3000 0.3000 0.0022 0.0000 L MPFC L RACC L PCC L PC L LPC R MPFC R RACC R PCC R PC R LPC L MPFC L RACC L PCC L PC L LPC R MPFC R RACC R PCC R PC R LPC P-Value Increased Connectivity in MS Decreased Connectivity in MS 0.1143 0.2803 0.2633 0.1414 0.3000 0.1801 0.1566 0.2202 0.0910 0.3000 0.0063 0.1062 0.2202 0.2202 0.3000 0.0277 0.0005 0.0296 0.3000 0.0328 0.0010 0.0006 0.0000 0.1527 0.0484 0.0002 0.0015 0.0001 0.0040 0.1295 0.0026 0.0000 0.0550 0.0040 0.0001 0.0000 0.0203 0.2443 0.0000 0.0000 0.1581 0.2003 0.0001 0.0012 0.1478 0.0000 0.0000 0.0019 0.3000 0.0002 0.0029 0.0093 0.0021 0.0747 0.0095 0.0145 0.0765 0.0011 0.0001 0.0000 0.1491 0.0000 0.0333 0.1281 0.2399 0.0048 0.0003 0.0018 0.0001 0.0003 L THAL (1) L SPL (2) L MFG (3) L SFG (4) L AG (5) L SMG (6) R THAL (1) R SPL (2) R MFG (3) R SFG (4) R AG (5) R SMG (6) L THAL (1) L SPL (2) L MFG (3) L SFG (4) L AG (5) L SMG (6) R THAL (1) R SPL (2) R MFG (3) R SFG (4) R AG (5) R SMG (6) P-Value Increased Connectivity in MS Decreased Connectivity in MS 0.2014 0.2023 0.0001 0.1062 0.2202 0.0260 0.1062 0.0882 0.0010 0.0001 0.0000 0.0872 0.2202 0.1501 0.0040 0.1117 0.0002 0.0000 0.1857 0.3000 0.0011 0.0003 0.0064 0.0031 0.0000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.1431 0.0059 0.3000 0.1340 0.0000 0.1491 0.0145 0.0410 0.0021 0.0765 0.0143 0.0090 0.0000 0.1841 0.0547 0.0069 0.1673 0.0263 0.2499 0.1044 0.0000 0.0001 0.3000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0166 0.3000 0.0011 0.0393 0.0000 0.2399 0.1411 0.0000 0.0048 0.2091 0.2592 0.0003 0.0861 0.0003 0.0095 0.0048 0.0006 0.0242 0.1760 0.1886 0.0112 0.0066 0.0004 0.0007 0.0000 0.0691 0.1386 0.2795 0.3000 0.3000 0.0006 0.3000 0.3000 0.0011 0.3000 0.0145 0.0000 L AG L FG L SPL L SMG L HF L SFG R AG R FG R SPL R SMG R HF R SFG L AG L FG L SPL L SMG L HF L SFG R AG R FG R SPL R SMG R HF R SFG P-Value Increased Connectivity in MS Decreased Connectivity in MS 0.0000 0.1845 0.1728 0.3000 0.1371 0.0970 0.3000 0.0749 0.2373 0.0221 0.0000 0.1892 0.3000 0.1345 0.2553 0.2003 0.3000 0.3000 0.0006 0.0229 0.0000 0.3000 0.2957 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.0175 0.0006 0.2319 0.0000 0.3000 0.3000 0.1348 0.0132 0.2346 0.2641 0.0022 0.0241 0.1163 0.0000 0.0725 0.1848 0.1778 0.1661 0.0008 0.0022 0.3000 0.3000 0.0142 0.0000 0.2971 0.0180 0.1315 0.0099 0.3000 0.0000 0.0082 0.0538 0.0054 0.0000 0.2983 0.1652 0.0624 0.2859 0.0027 0.0017 0.3000 0.3000 0.1148 0.0000 0.1332 0.3000 0.3000 0.2901 0.1085 0.2391 0.1924 0.1350 0.0391 0.0000 L CR L SFG L SPL L SMG R CR R SFG R SPL R SMG FORNIX L CR L SFG L SPL L SMG R CR R SFG R SPL R SMG FORNIX P-Value Increased Connectivity in MS Decreased Connectivity in MS Side Anterior Limb of Internal Capsule Frontal Lobe WM Globus Palladus Hippocampal Formation Lateral Occipito- temporal Gyrus Occipital Lobe WM Parietal Lobe WM Temporal Lobe WM Uncus Corpus Callosum Time point 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd Right 62.5 62.5 62.5 75 37.5 62.5 62.5 75 50 62.5 50 62.5 75 75 87.5 75 62.5 75 75 75 Left 75 75 75 75 75 62.5 62.5 62.5 0 0 37.5 37.5 62.5 75 62.5 62.5 75 75 The percentile of the MS patients (N=8) having increase in FA reduction at 1 year follow up

Upload: others

Post on 18-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How to change the template color theme Multiple Sclerosis ... · How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) DES I G N G U I DE

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x48” presentation poster. You can use it to create your research poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. To view our template tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK. When you are ready to print your poster, go online to PosterPresentations.com Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001

QU ICK START

Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is more comfortable to you.

Go to VIEW > ZOOM.

Title, Authors, and Affiliations Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this feature and change the size of your text. TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution name(s).

Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments. TIP: See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.

Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.

Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will print well.

ORIGINAL DISTORTED

Cornerhandles

Good

prin

/ngqu

ality

Badprin/n

gqu

ality

QU ICK START ( con t . )

How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also create your own color theme. You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on your poster.

How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can add more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or by adding a text box from the HOME menu.

Text size

Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present. The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference requirements.

How to add Tables To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and columns.

You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.

Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been created.

How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the column options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.

How to remove the info bars

If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide Master.

Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint of “Print-quality” PDF.

Print your poster When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster” button. Choose the poster type the best suits your needs and submit your order. If you submit a PowerPoint document you will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to printing. If your order is placed and paid for before noon, Pacific, Monday through Friday, your order will ship out that same day. Next day, Second day, Third day, and Free Ground services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more information.

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

©2013PosterPresenta/ons.com2117FourthStreet,[email protected]

Cognitive impairment affects 40-70% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS)1. These impairments are seen in multiple domains of cognition including attention, memory, and speed of information processing2. In a previous study using resting-state fMRI, we found abnormal connectivity links for most patients with MS in the default mode network as well as other cognitive networks including attention, memory, language, and visual-spatial memory.

BACKGROUND

OBJECTIVES

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of White Matter Tracts of Resting State Cognitive Networks in Multiple Sclerosis

METHODS

RESULTS

DepartmentofNeurology,HenryFordHospital,Detroit,MI;2WayneStateUniversity,SchoolofMedicine,Detroit,MI

RahilDharia,BS1,2;EsmaeilDavoodi-Bojd,PhD1;QuanJing,PhD1;LianLi,PhD1;MirelaCerghet,MD,PhD1

To analyze the white matter damage and topological organization of white matter tracts in specific brain regions responsible for cognition in MS patients compared with healthy controls.

Funding Provided by Henry Ford Hospital and Foundation of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers

REFERENCES

VERBAL MEMORY

ATTENTION

DEFAULT MODE NETWORK

MRI measurements of DTI, T1, T2, and T2 FLAIR were acquired by GE clinical 3T system of 32 healthy subjects and 20 MS patients. DTI images were preprocessed in MATLAB to calculate the fractional anisotropy (FA) maps3,4,5,6. We investigated five circuits in the brain responsible for cognitive functions: •  Default Mode Network (DMN): (1) Medial Prefrontal Cortex (MPFC), (2) Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex (RACC), (3) Posterior Cingulate Cortex (PCC), (4) Precuneus (PC), and (5) Lateral Parietal Cortex (LPC)

• Attention: (1) Thalamus (Superior Colliculus and Pulvinar) (THAL), (2) Superior Parietal Lobule (SPL), (3) Middle Frontal Gyrus (MFG), (4) Superior Frontal Gyrus (SFG), (5) Angular Gyrus (AG), and (6) Supramarginal Gyrus (SMG) • Verbal memory: (1) Inferior Temporal Gyrus (ITG), (2) Medial Occipitotemporal Gyrus (MOG), (3) Middle Temporal Gyrus (MTG), (4) Temporal Pole (TP), (5) Angular Gyrus (AG), and (6) Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG)

• Memory: (1) Angular Gyrus (AG), (2) Fusiform Gyrus (FG), (3) Superior Parietal Lobule (SPL), (4) Supramarginal Gyrus (SMG), (5) Hippocampal Formation (HF), and (6) Superior Frontal Gyrus (SFG)

• Visual-Spatial Working Memory: (1) Cingulate Region (CR), (2) Superior Frontal Gyrus (SFG), (3) Fornix, (4) Superior Parietal Lobule (SPL), and (5) Supramarginal Gyrus (SMG)

VISUO-SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY

MEMORY

Sociodemographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics of subjects used for DTI and fMRI connectivity analysis

RRMS

CONTROLS Gender Female 15 16 Male 5 22 Race White 14 Black 6 Others 0 Age (median/range) 39.6 (26-54) 34.92 (17-64) Median disease duration (range) 7 (5-20) EDSS (mean/range) 3 (1-8) Cognitive complains 6

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of subjects

Side

AnteriorLimbofInternalCapsule

FrontalLobeWM

GlobusPalladus

Hippocampal

FormaKon

LateralOccipito-temporalGyrus

OccipitalLobeWM

ParietalLobeWM

TemporalLobeWM

UncusCorpusCallosum

Right 60% 60% 55% 65% 50% 50% 65% 60% 85% 70%

LeO 60% 60% 60% 55% 0 30% 60% 60% 55%

The percentile of the MS patients (N=20) having significant FA reduction (p<0.05) of ≥50%

VARIABLEMSsubjects

N=7HealthyControls

N=18 p-value

Meanageatscanyears(range) 35.7(28-54) 36.4(17-62)

Mean(range)diseaseduraKon,years 4.8(2-10)

Median(range)EDSSscore 2.25(1-7.5)

Useofdisease-modifyingtherapies(Y/N) 7/0

ComplainsofcogniKvedeficit 4

Mean(SD)structuralMRImetrics

BrainVolume(cm3) 1051.00(154.17 1196.84(99.84 0.005ThalamicVolume(cm3) 13.52(1.01) 16.32(1.59) 0.0006

Whitema]erVolume(cm3) 427.90(94.26) 500.76(40.92) 0.008Greyma]erVolume 623.10(67.96) 696.09(66.21) 0.01

1.MSpa/enthavesignificantwhitema`erdamageandreduc/oninvariousregionsinthebraininvolvedincogni/venetworks.Brainvolume,normalizedthalamicvolume,whitema`ervolume,andgreyma`ervolumeweresignificantlylowerinMSsubjectssimilarwithpreviousreports7,8.2.ForMSpa/entswithmul/plescansover/me,furtherprogressionofwhitema`erdamagewasfound.3.Wereportthatbothanatomicalandfunc/onalconnec/vityinsidedefaultmodenetworkandcogni/venetworksshowedsignificantdifferencescomparedwithhealthysubjects.Similarwithpreviousreportswefounddysfunc/oninfMRIconnec/vityinDMN9,10.4.Analysesofbothfunc/onalandstructuralconnec/vityofthefivecogni/venetworks(DMN,a`en/on,verbalmemory,memory,visuo-spa/almemory)showedasignificantdecreaseinstructuralconnec/vitybilaterallyinMSsubjectsalongwithadecreaseinfunc/onalconnec/vityofthesuperiormarginalgyrus,angulargyrus,fusiformgyrus,temporalpole,hippocampalforma/on,andthalamus.Thedecreaseinfunc/onalconnec/vitymostlikelyrelatestowhitema`erdamageinMS.Someregionsinthestudiednetworkshadheightenedconnec/vitywhichmayrepresentcompensatoryconnec/onsaspostulatedintheliterature11.

1.AmatoMP,PonzianiG,SiracusaG,SorbiS.Cogni/vedysfunc/oninearly-onsetmul/plesclerosis:areappraisalafer10yearsArchivesofNeurology2001;58910):1602-6.2.HuijbregtsSC,KalkresNF,deSommervilleLM,deCrestV,PolmanGH.Cogni/veimpairmentanddeclineindifferentMSsubtypes.JNeurolSci2006;245(1-2):187-943.O.Sporns,"Thehumanconnectome:acomplexnetwork,"AnnNYAcadSci,vol.1224,pp.109-25,Apr2011.4.B.Fischl,D.H.Salat,E.Busa,M.Albert,M.Dieterich,C.Haselgrove,etal.,"Wholebrainsegmenta/on:automatedlabelingofneuroanatomicalstructuresinthehumanbrain,"Neuron,vol.33,pp.341-55,Jan312002.5.J.D.Tournier,F.Calamante,andA.Connelly,"MRtrix:Diffusiontractographyincrossingfiberregions,"Interna/onalJournalofImagingSystemsandTechnology,vol.22,pp.53-66,2012.6.S.M.Smith,M.Jenkinson,M.W.Woolrich,C.F.Beckmann,T.E.Behrens,H.Johansen-Berg,etal.,"Advancesinfunc/onalandstructuralMRimageanalysisandimplementa/onasFSL,"Neuroimage,vol.23,pp.S208-S219,20047.HoutchensMK,BenedictRH,KillianyR,SharmaJ,JaisaniZ,SinghB,Weinstock-Gu`manB,Gu`manCR,BakshiR.Thalamicatrophyandcogni/oninmul/plesclerosis.Neurology2007;69:1213-23.8.SchoonheimMM,HulstHE,BrandtRB,StrikM,WinkAM,UitdehaagBMJ,BarkhofF,GeurtsJJG.Thalamusstructureandfunc/ondetermineseverityofcogni/veimpairmentinmul/plesclerosis.Neurology2015;84:776-83.9RoccaMA,ValsasinaP,AbsintaM,RiccitelliG,.RodegherME,MisciP,RossiP,FaliniA,ComiG,FilippiM.default-modenetworkdysfunc/onandcogni/veimpairmentinprogressiveMS.Neurology2010;74:1252-5910.JonesDT,MateenFJ,LucchinenCF,JackCR,WelkerKM.DefaultModenetworkdisrup/onsecondarytoalesionintheanteriorthalamus/ArchNeurol2011;68:242-246.11.AkbarN,GiorgioA,TillC,SledJG,DoesburgSM,DeStefanoN,BanwellB.Altera/onsoffunc/onalandstructuralconnec/vityinpediatric-onsetmul/plesclerosis.PloSOne2016;11:1-14.

BilateraldecreasedDTIconnec/vityinMSsubjectscomparedtocontrols.AsymmetricdecreasedfMRIconnec/vityinvolvinglefcingulateandparietalcortex.

Higherfunc/onalconnec/vitywasobservedinbilateralposteriorcingulatecortexandlefprecuneus.

DTI

DTI

fMRI

fMRI

BilateraldecreasedDTIconnec/vityinMSsubjectscomparedtocontrols.AsymmetricdecreasedfMRIconnec/vityinvolvingbilateralthalamusandleffrontalandparietallobes.

DTI

DTI

fMRI

fMRI

BilateraldecreasedDTIconnec/vityinMSsubjectscomparedtocontrols.DecreasedfMRIconnec/vityinvolvingbilateralhippocampus.

BilateraldecreasedDTIconnec/vityinMSsubjectscomparedtocontrols.DecreasedfMRIconnec/vityinvolvingbilateralfusiformgyrus,lefangulargyrus,andtemporalpole.

BilateraldecreasedDTIconnec/vityinMSsubjectscomparedtocontrols.Mixedpa`ernofdecreasedandincreasedfMRIconnec/vitybilaterally.

DTI

DTI

fMRI

fMRI

DTI

DTI fMRI

fMRI

fMRI

fMRI

DTI

DTI

0.0011 0.2154 0.2202 0.2202 0.2202

0.0002 0.0003 0.2202 0.2202 0.2202

0.3000 0.0885 0.2395

0.0000 0.2638 0.0000 0.1245

0.0005 0.1056 0.0004 0.2006 0.0017

0.1588 0.1045 0.3000 0.1262 0.1401 0.1326

0.1484 0.1574 0.0410 0.0256 0.3000 0.3000 0.0012

0.2589 0.0384 0.2468 0.3000 0.0034 0.3000 0.0037 0.0002

0.3000 0.1688 0.2973 0.1164 0.1732 0.0382 0.3000 0.0187 0.2455

0.1498 0.0155 0.0255 0.3000 0.0145 0.2067 0.0061 0.0271 0.0042 0.0051

0.0755 0.3000 0.2514 0.0546 0.2710 0.0006 0.0005 0.0844 0.0005 0.3000 0.0001

L ITG

L MOG

L MTG

L TP

L AG

L IFG

R ITG

R MOG

R MTG

R TP

R AG

R ITG

L ITG

L MOG

L MTG

L TP

L AG

L IFG

R ITG

R MOG

R MTG

R TP

R AG

R IFG

P-Value

Increased Connectivity in MS

Decreased Connectivity in MS

0.0000 0.2202 0.1123 0.1424 0.2202 0.1155

0.1832 0.0000 0.2202 0.1800 0.2202 0.2202

0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.2202 0.3000

0.0001 0.0000 0.0003 0.0000 0.2202 0.2202

0.0006 0.0782 0.1208 0.0022 0.0000

0.0000 0.0002 0.2852 0.0411 0.0638 0.0000

0.0007 0.3000 0.2382 0.3000 0.1655 0.0992 0.0000

0.0019 0.0013 0.0197 0.0027 0.1123 0.0003 0.0034

0.0281 0.0037 0.0385 0.0024 0.0027 0.0001 0.0001 0.0050

0.1479 0.3000 0.3000 0.0020 0.0145 0.0001 0.3000 0.3000 0.0022 0.0000

L MPFC

L RACC

L PCC

L PC

L LPC

R MPFC

R RACC

R PCC

R PC

R LPC

L MPFC

L RACC

L PCC

L PC

L LPC

R MPFC

R RACC

R PCC

R PC

R LPC

P-Value

Increased Connectivity in MS

Decreased Connectivity in MS

0.1143 0.2803 0.2633 0.1414 0.3000 0.1801

0.1566 0.2202 0.0910

0.3000 0.0063 0.1062 0.2202 0.2202 0.3000

0.0277 0.0005 0.0296 0.3000

0.0328 0.0010 0.0006 0.0000 0.1527

0.0484 0.0002 0.0015 0.0001 0.0040 0.1295

0.0026 0.0000 0.0550 0.0040 0.0001 0.0000

0.0203 0.2443 0.0000 0.0000 0.1581 0.2003 0.0001

0.0012 0.1478 0.0000 0.0000 0.0019 0.3000 0.0002 0.0029

0.0093 0.0021 0.0747 0.0095 0.0145 0.0765 0.0011 0.0001 0.0000

0.1491 0.0000 0.0333 0.1281 0.2399 0.0048 0.0003 0.0018 0.0001 0.0003

L THAL

(1)

L SPL (2)

L MFG

(3)

L SFG (4)

L AG (5)

L SMG

(6)

R THAL

(1)

R SPL (2)

R MFG

(3)

R SFG (4)

R AG (5)

R SMG

(6)

L THAL (1)

L SPL (2)

L MFG (3)

L SFG (4) L

AG (5)

L SMG (6)

R THAL

(1)

R SPL (2)

R MFG

(3)

R SFG (4)

R AG (5) R

SMG (6)

P-Value

Increased Connectivity in MS

Decreased Connectivity in MS

0.2014 0.2023

0.0001 0.1062 0.2202 0.0260 0.1062 0.0882

0.0010 0.0001 0.0000 0.0872 0.2202 0.1501

0.0040 0.1117 0.0002 0.0000 0.1857 0.3000

0.0011 0.0003 0.0064 0.0031 0.0000 0.3000 0.3000

0.3000 0.1431 0.0059 0.3000 0.1340 0.0000 0.1491

0.0145 0.0410 0.0021 0.0765 0.0143 0.0090 0.0000

0.1841 0.0547 0.0069 0.1673 0.0263 0.2499 0.1044 0.0000

0.0001 0.3000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0166 0.3000 0.0011 0.0393 0.0000

0.2399 0.1411 0.0000 0.0048 0.2091 0.2592 0.0003 0.0861 0.0003

0.0095 0.0048 0.0006 0.0242 0.1760 0.1886 0.0112 0.0066 0.0004 0.0007 0.0000

0.0691 0.1386 0.2795 0.3000 0.3000 0.0006 0.3000 0.3000 0.0011 0.3000 0.0145 0.0000

L AG

L FG

L SPL

L SMG

L HF

L SFG

R AG

R FG

R SPL

R SMG

R HF

R SFG

L AG

L FG

L SPL

L SMG

L HF

L SFG

R AG

R FG

R SPL

R SMG

R HF

R SFG

P-Value

Increased Connectivity in MS

Decreased Connectivity in MS

0.0000 0.1845 0.1728 0.3000 0.1371 0.0970 0.3000 0.0749 0.2373

0.0221 0.0000 0.1892 0.3000 0.1345 0.2553 0.2003 0.3000 0.3000

0.0006 0.0229 0.0000 0.3000 0.2957 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000

0.0175 0.0006 0.2319 0.0000 0.3000 0.3000 0.1348 0.0132 0.2346

0.2641 0.0022 0.0241 0.1163 0.0000 0.0725 0.1848 0.1778 0.1661

0.0008 0.0022 0.3000 0.3000 0.0142 0.0000 0.2971 0.0180 0.1315

0.0099 0.3000 0.0000 0.0082 0.0538 0.0054 0.0000 0.2983 0.1652

0.0624 0.2859 0.0027 0.0017 0.3000 0.3000 0.1148 0.0000 0.1332

0.3000 0.3000 0.2901 0.1085 0.2391 0.1924 0.1350 0.0391 0.0000

L CR

L SFG

L SPL

L SMG

R CR

R SFG

R SPL

R SMG FORNIX

L CR

L SFG

L SPL

L SMG

R CR

R SFG

R SPL

R SMG

FORNIX

P-Value

Increased Connectivity in MS

Decreased Connectivity in MS

Side

Anterior Limb of Internal Capsule

Frontal Lobe WM

Globus Palladus

Hippocampal Formation

Lateral Occipito-

temporal Gyrus

Occipital Lobe WM

Parietal Lobe WM

Temporal Lobe WM

Uncus Corpus Callosum

Time point 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd

Right 62.5 62.5 62.5 75 37.5 62.5 62.5 75 50 62.5 50 62.5 75 75 87.5 75 62.5 75

75 75Left 75 75 75 75 75 62.5 62.5 62.5 0 0 37.5 37.5 62.5 75 62.5 62.5 75 75

The percentile of the MS patients (N=8) having increase in FA reduction at 1 year follow up